clin kidney j-2012-fremeaux-bacchi-4-6.pdf

Upload: teodora-joghiu

Post on 14-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Clin Kidney J-2012-Fremeaux-Bacchi-4-6.pdf

    1/3

    Clin Kidney J (2012) 5: 46

    doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfr177

    Editorial Comment

    Treatment of atypical uraemic syndrome in the era of eculizumab

    Veronique Fremeaux-Bacchi

    Department of Immunology, Assistance PubliqueHopitaux de Paris, Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France

    Correspondence and offprint requests to: Veronique Fremeaux-Bacchi; E-mail: [email protected]

    Keywords: acute kidney disease; atypical HUS; complement; eculizumab; mutations

    Atypical haemolyticuraemic syndrome (aHUS) is charac-terized by endothelial damage leading to renal failure.aHUS has a proven genetic background [1]. To date, under-lying genetic factors have been identified in complementcomponents and complement regulators among ~50% ofaHUS patients [2,3]. The disease-associated genes includeC3 and factor B, which form the complement amplificationconvertase C3bBb and the regulators factor H (CFH, a plasmagycoprotein), membrane cofactor protein (CD46, MCP) andfactor I (a plasma serine protease) which concur to control-ling C3 convertase activity (Figure 1). In addition, autoanti-bodies recognizing factor H have been identified as beingassociated with haemolyticuraemic syndrome (HUS) [4].Over the last decade, a clear link has been demonstratedbetween this disorder and a defective regulation of thecomplement system components [5]. Thus, it is generallyaccepted that aHUS is a disease of excessive complementactivation in the kidney glomerular and arteriolar cells.Following yet not well-identified triggering events, endo-

    thelial cells lose their integrity and become a target foran uncontrolled complement attack. The release of C5aand the inactive formin terms of cytolytic effectofthe membrane attack complex (MAC) C5b-9 induces aprocoagulant phenotype. This deleterious triggering ofthe complement and the coagulation cascades leads tothe development of the thrombotic microangiopathy(TMA) that characterizes aHUS [6].

    aHUS is a severe and frequently relapsing disordercom-prising a typical triad of thrombocytopaenia, haemolysisand acute renal failure, in the absence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection, and detectableADAMST13 in the serum. It portends a dismal prognosis.More than 50% of patients with aHUS progress to chronicrenal failure and 10% die from complications of the dis-

    ease. The disease can affect patients of all ages and itsprognosis correlates to a certain extent with the identifiedgenetic defects. Patients with CFH mutations carry theworst prognosis [7]. At the end of the first year followingthe onset of aHUS, 60% of patients with CFH mutations dieor progress to dialysis dependency. In addition, when renaltransplantation is undertaken, loss of the graft occurs inover 50% of renal transplants, due to HUS recurrence [8].Despite the fact that plasma exchanges are the treat-ment of choice in severe thrombotic thrombocytopaenicpurpura [9], their efficacy in aHUS is not guaranteed.Therefore, other therapeutic procedures, in particular com-

    plement-blocking agents, may be of benefit, and consider-ing the severity of this condition are fully justified. As theactivation of C5 plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiologyof aHUS, the newly elaborated complement antagonist ecu-lizumab represents a reasonable hope as a promising treat-ment for the disease [10].

    Eculizumab (Soliris; Alexion) is a humanized monoclonalantibody indicated for the treatment of paroxysmal noc-turnal haemoglobinuria [11]. It binds specifically and withhigh affinity to the complement protein C5, thereby prevent-ing the release of the anaphylatoxin C5a and the assemblyof the terminal complement complex C5b-9. To this day,>50 cases of patients who received eculizumab for aHUShave been published or included in an international multi-centre prospective Phase II trial [8,1224,25]. Eculizumabwas used in patients who had experienced aHUS in theirnative kidney, in order to rescue or prevent post-transplantrecurrence. There are still few reports indicating that theC5 mAb antagonist eculizumab may be an effective form

    of treatment for aHUS. The results of clinical trials havenow confirmed that the drug arrests the TMA process andimproves renal function or stabilizes its decline [26,27]. Kimet al. [28] and Garjou et al. [29], in two articles that appear inthis issue of the Clinical Kidney Journal, describe the out-come of aHUS in two additional cases of patients who re-ceived eculizumab for this syndrome occurring in theirnative kidneys. In both cases, a mutation in complementgenes was identified and intensive plasmaphaereses wereof no avail to abate the HUS. Plasma exchanges were in-efficient to arrest the haematological and renal symptomsin a little girl with CFH mutation who presented with thedisease at the age of 7 months. It comes as no surprisethat plasma exchanges were not beneficial in the patientwith MCP mutation. MCP is classically associated with a

    childhood onset, a spontaneous abortion of the TMA andrecurrent episodes. Interestingly, this observation high-lights the poor outcome of patients with an MCP mutationwho presented with an onset of the disease at adult age.After failure of plasma exchanges, eculizumab induced anincrease in platelet counts and haemolysis was stopped.The patient with MCP mutation who was treated laterthan 3 months after the onset did not recover his kidneyfunction. Conversely, in the paediatric case with CFH muta-tion, eculizumab was started 4 months after the onset. Inthis patient, a slow improvement in the kidney function wasobserved after a period of peritoneal dialysis. Duran et al.

    The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]

  • 7/27/2019 Clin Kidney J-2012-Fremeaux-Bacchi-4-6.pdf

    2/3

    [30], in this issue of the Clinical Kidney Journal, report asignificant recovery of renal function in a patient with aCFH mutation who received eculizumab 3 months afterbeing started on dialysis following recurrence of HUS afterkidney transplantation.

    By blocking the terminal pathway of the complementcascade, eculizumab entails an increased risk ofNeisseriameningitides infection. As recommended, the patients werevaccinated before they were commenced on eculizumab.In these cases, the tolerability was good. It appears that

    eculizumab, the first targeted terminalcomplement inhibitor,is able to provide an effective and generally well-toleratedtreatment for patients suffering from aHUS. Eculizumabshould therefore be considered for treating all patients withchildhood or adult onset of atypical HUS. Unfortunately,renal function recovery cannot be expected when irre-versible histologic injury to the kidney has already beenestablished before the treatment is undertaken. In othercases, this new targeted monoclonal antibody represents areal hope as a promising treatment to rescue the kidneyfunction following the onset of TMA.

    Conflict of interest statement. V.F.B. acts as a scientific advisor forAlexion.

    (See related articles by: Duranet al. Rescue therapy with eculizumabin a transplant recipient withatypical haemolytic-uraemic syndrome.Clin Kidney J 2012; 5: 2830; Garjau et al. Early treatment witheculizumab in atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Clin Kidney J2012; 5: 3133; and Kim et al. Eculizumab in atypical haemolyticuraemic syndrome allows cessation of plasma exchange anddialysis.Clin Kidney J 2012; 5: 3436.)

    References

    1. Loirat C, Fremeaux-Bacchi V. Atypical hemolytic uremic syn-drome.Orphanet J Rare Dis2011; 6: 60

    2. Sellier-Leclerc AL, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Dragon-Durey MAet al.Differential impact of complement mutations on clinical char-acteristics in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. J Am SocNephrol2007; 18: 23922400

    3. Noris M, Caprioli J, Bresin Eet al.Relative role of genetic com-plement abnormalities in sporadic and familial aHUS and theirimpact on clinical phenotype. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5:18441859

    4. Dragon-Durey MA, Sethi SK, Bagga A et al. Clinical featuresof anti-factor H autoantibody-associated hemolytic uremicsyndrome.J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 21: 21802187

    5. Noris M, Remuzzi G. Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome.N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 16761687

    6. de Jorge EG, Macor P, Paixao-Cavalcante Det al.The develop-ment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome depends oncomplement C5.J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 22: 137145

    7. Le Quintrec M, Roumenina L, Noris Met al.Atypical hemolyticuremic syndrome associated with mutations in complementregulator genes.Semin Thromb Hemost2010; 36: 641652

    8. Zuber J, Le Quintrec M, Sberro-Soussan R et al. New insightsinto postrenal transplant hemolytic uremic syndrome.Nat RevNephrol2010; 7: 2335

    9. Hovinga JA, Vesely SK, Terrell DRet al. Survival and relapse inpatients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood2009; 115: 15001511; quiz 1662

    10. Salant DJ. Targeting complement C5 in atypical hemolyticuremic syndrome.J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 22: 79

    11. Rother RP, Rollins SA, Mojcik CF et al. Discovery and developmentof the complement inhibitor eculizumab for the treatment ofparoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25: 12561264

    12. Al-Akash SI, Almond PS, Savell VH Jret al.Eculizumab induceslong-term remission in recurrent post-transplant HUS asso-ciated with C3 gene mutation. Pediatr Nephrol 2011; 26:613619

    13. Chatelet V, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Lobbedez T et al. Safety andlong-term efficacy of eculizumab in a renal transplant patientwith recurrent atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Am JTransplant 2009; 9: 26442645

    Fig. 1. The complement system is a major innate immune defence mechanism. Complement may be activated by the classical, lectin or alternativepathways, all leading to the cleavage of the inactive central component C3 to biologically active C3b. C3b binds covalently to any surface, either foreignor self. When C3b is bound to positively charged surfaces (called alternative pathway activator surfaces as present in microorganisms) C3b interacts with

    factor B (FB) to form the C3 convertase (C3bBb) of the alternative pathway amplification loop and may generate a C5 convertase leading to the releaseof C5a, which is also an anaphylatoxin, and C5b which initiates the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC), by binding C6 and C7. The C5b67inserts into the membrane where it binds C8 and many molecules of C9, forming a pore. It can be cytolytic, forming a transmembrane channel,which causes osmotic lysis of the target cell or sublytic, associated with cell activation. In order to avoid complement hyperactivation, the alternativepathway C3 convertase is tightly regulated.

    Clin Kidney J (2012): Editorial Comment 5

  • 7/27/2019 Clin Kidney J-2012-Fremeaux-Bacchi-4-6.pdf

    3/3

    14. Davin JC, Gracchi V, Bouts A et al. Maintenance of kidneyfunction following treatment with eculizumab and discontin-uation of plasma exchange after a third kidney transplant foratypical hemolytic uremic syndrome associated with a CFHmutation.Am J Kidney Dis 2010; 55: 708711

    15. Gruppo RA, Rother RP. Eculizumab for congenital atypicalhemolytic-uremic syndrome. N EnglJ Med 2009; 360: 544546

    16. Kose O, Zimmerhackl LB, Jungraithmayr T et al.New treatmentoptions for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome with the com-plement inhibitor eculizumab.Semin Thromb Hemost2010; 36:

    66967217. Lapeyraque AL, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Robitaille P. Efficacy of

    eculizumab in a patient with factor-H-associated atypical hemo-lytic uremic syndrome.Pediatr Nephrol2011; 26: 621624

    18. Mache CJ, Acham-Roschitz B, Fremeaux-Bacchi V et al. Com-plement inhibitor eculizumab in atypical hemolytic uremicsyndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4: 13121316

    19. Nester C, Stewart Z, Myers D et al. Pre-emptive eculizumaband plasmapheresis for renal transplant in atypical hemo-lytic uremic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6:14881494

    20. Nurnberger J, Witzke O, Saez AOet al.Eculizumab for atyp-ical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:542544

    21. Prescott HC, Wu HM, Cataland SRet al.Eculizumab therapy inan adult with plasma exchange-refractory atypical hemolytic

    uremic syndrome.Am J Hematol2010; 85: 97697722. Tschumi S, Gugger M, Bucher BS et al. Eculizumab in atypical

    hemolytic uremic syndrome: long-term clinical course andhistological findings.Pediatr Nephrol2011; 26: 20852088

    23. Weitz M, Amon O, Bassler D et al. Prophylactic eculizumabprior to kidney transplantation for atypical hemolytic uremicsyndrome. Pediatr Nephrol2011; 26: 13251329

    24. Zimmerhackl LB, Hofer J, Cortina Get al.Prophylactic eculizu-mab after renal transplantation in atypical hemolytic-uremicsyndrome. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 17461748

    25. Larrea CF,CofanF, OppenheimerF etal. Efficacy of eculizumab inthe treatment of recurrent atypical hemolytic-uremic syndromeafter renal transplantation.Transplantation2010; 89: 903904

    26. Legendre C, Babu S, Furman Ret al. Safety and Efficacy of Ecu-

    lizumab in aHUS Patients Resistant to Plasma Therapy: InterimAnalysis from a Phase 2 Trial.Abstract presented at the 43rdannual meeting of theAmerican Societyof Nephrology, Denver,CO, USA, 1621 November 2010

    27. Muus P, Legendre C, Douglas K et al. Safety and Efficacyof Eculizumab in aHUS Patients on Chronic Plasma Therapy:Interim Analysis of a Phase 2 Trial. Abstract presented at the43rd annual meeting of the American Society of Nephrology,Denver, CO, USA, 1621 November 2010

    28. Kim JJ, Waller SC, Reid CJ. Eculizumab in atypical haemolyticuraemic syndrome allows cessation of plasma exchange anddialysis.Clin Kidney J2012; 5: 3436

    29. Garjau M, Azancot M, Ramos R et al. Early treatment witheculizumab may be beneficial in atypical haemolytic urae-mic syndrome.Clin Kidney J 2012; 5: 3133

    30. Duran CE, Maduell FM, Campistol JM. Rescue therapy with

    eculizumab in a transplant recipient with atypical haemolyticuraemic syndrome.Clin Kidney J 2012; 5: 2830

    Received for publication: 15.12.11; Accepted in revised form: 15.12.11

    6 V. Fremeaux-Bacchi