clinical evaluation tools instructor... · clinical evaluation tools purpose ... clinical rotation...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright held by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC 1
Reprinted with permission
Clinical Evaluation Tools
Purpose
This session provides an overview of a variety of typical
clinical evaluation tools that the new clinical educator
may use for student evaluation. Through discussion and
a small-group activity, participants are exposed to the
major evaluation tools. Depending on when and where
the participants attended nursing school, the concept
map and other tools may be new to them. The hands-on
activity in using a clinical performance rubric helps
build participants’ skills and readies them for their first
clinical rotation with students. This session is the
practical application of the prior session, Clinical
Evaluation: Concepts and Processes (Tab 5).
Time 60 minutes
Outline Objectives
Clinical Evaluation Tools
Tools for Evaluation: Assignments
Observation
Clinical Performance Rubric
Patient Assessment
Nursing Care Plans
Concept Maps
Clinical Evaluation Activity
Student Self-Evaluation
Student-Faculty Relationships
Summary
Materials Needed PowerPoint Slides 6-1 through 6-27
Examples of concept care maps that students have
created
Clinical Evaluation Activity Handouts (Tab 6 of the
participant notebook, pages 10-20
Student Scenario and Clinical Evaluation Rubric
Copyright held by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC 2
Reprinted with permission
Clinical Evaluation Tools
Opening
PPT 6-1
Introduce yourself, your role, and share some
background information on your expertise with clinical
evaluation.
State: The purpose of this session is to review with you
the types of clinical evaluation tools that might be
encountered when evaluating students in clinical
practice. The decision as to which evaluation tools are
to be used is often made by the full-time or permanent
faculty in the clinical course. As adjunct clinical
instructors you are obligated to follow the evaluation
methods established by the course faculty and offer
suggestions for change when needed to the course
faculty. More than likely you will not use all of these
methods in a semester, but having an understanding of
the variety of methods is important.
6-2
Objectives Discuss a variety of clinical evaluation tools.
Discuss the development and use of a clinical performance rubric.
Discuss methods of providing feedback to students.
Compare the traditional nursing care plan with the concept map.
Discuss how to develop positive student-faculty relationships.
Practice using the performance rubric for a selected case study.
Objectives
PPT 6-2
Highlight the objectives for this session. Explain that
after discussing the major evaluation methods and tools,
participants will work in small groups to practice using
a clinical performance rubric.
6-3
Clinical Evaluation Tools
Direct Observation
Preceptor Observation
Anecdotal Notes
Clinical Performance Rubrics
Tools for Evaluation
PPT 6-3
Briefly review with the participants the tools that the
faculty member uses to evaluate students: direct
observation, preceptor or staff observation, anecdotal
notes, and clinical performance rubrics.
Copyright held by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC 3
Reprinted with permission
6-4
Tools for Evaluation: Assignments
Journaling/Reflection Papers
Process Recordings
Portfolios
Patient Assessment Tools
Nursing Care Plans
Concept Maps
Student Self-Evaluation
Tools for Evaluation: Assignments
PPT 6-4
The evaluation methods on this slide may be assigned to
the students to assist faculty members in the evaluation
process. These methods or tools help to evaluate
students’ cognitive, affective, and psychomotor
domains. These methods include: Journals/Reflection
Papers, Process Recordings, Portfolios, Patient
Assessment Forms, Nursing Care Plans, Concept Maps,
Medication Profiles, and Student Self-Evaluations.
6-5
Observation
Observation Guides
• Checklists
• Simulation Lab
Direct Clinical Observation
• Anecdotal Notes
• Clinical Rubrics
• Preceptor Observation
Observation PPT 6-5
Observation is the main method faculty members use in
the student evaluation process. Observation occurs in
the skills lab using observation guides in the form of
checklists during skill demonstrations. There is direct
clinical observation in the clinical setting by the faculty
member, the preceptor, or even the staff member.
After observing students, faculty members often keep
anecdotal notes to remember specific information about
their observations. According to O’Connor (2015),
anecdotal notes should include a description of:
Care the patient received
What the student did or failed to do in providing
care
Any situational or environmental factors that
contributed to the observed situation
In addition to anecdotal notes, faculty may choose to
use a clinical performance rubric to record student
performance, which will be presented next.
6-6
What is a clinical performance
rubric?
Predetermined behaviors/criteria
Delineates safe and satisfactory student performance
Derived from course outcomes
Describes different levels of quality such as:
• Satisfactory
• Needs Improvement
• Unsatisfactory
What is a clinical performance rubric?
PPT 6- 6
The clinical performance rubric is a listing of
predetermined behaviors that faculty members want
students to be able to consistently perform in a safe and
satisfactory manner in order for students to achieve a
passing score. The predetermined behaviors on the
rubric should be derived from the clinical course
learning outcomes. The rubric also delineates a quality
rating to the performance of behaviors such as
satisfactory, needs improvement, and unsatisfactory.
Copyright held by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC 4
Reprinted with permission
6-7
Why develop a clinical rubric?
Provide new students with expected behaviors
Provide students with a concrete view of their performance
Identification of poor levels of performance early
Provide new faculty with examples of behaviors
Why develop a clinical rubric? PPT 6-7
First, the clinical performance rubric provides the brand
new student with a list of behaviors faculty expect them
to perform by the end of the first clinical course. For
the new student, the rubric can help them better
understand the nurses’ role and responsibilities.
Second, a copy of the rubric with faculty comments or
feedback provides the student with a concrete view of
their performance. The completed rubric also can be a
guide for faculty when giving the student verbal
feedback.
Third, the rubric helps faculty identify poor student
performance early in the term so the student then has
time to make improvements.
Fourth, the clinical rubric provides the new faculty
member with examples of behaviors to be evaluated as
well as provides a mechanism for assigning a letter
grade to a clinical course by assigning a numerical value
to each rating.
6-8
Rubric Rating Scale Examples
Clinical Competence Rating Scale
• Independent
• Supervised
• Assisted
• Marginal
• Dependent
• Not Applicable
• Not Observed
Keele University Clinical Criteria
• Outstanding
• Very good
• Good
• Average
• Poor
• Unacceptable
• Not Assessed
Rubric Rating Scales PPT 6-8
These are two examples of rubric rating scales that
could be adapted. The Clinical Competence Rating
Scale was adapted from Dr. Kathleen Bondy by Dr.
Linda J. Scheetz (2000). According to Sheetz, this
rating scale has been tested and has evidence of
reliability and validity, and uses the ratings of
Independent, Supervised, Assisted, Marginal,
Dependent, Not Applicable, and Not Observed. This
rating scale is best used during skills demonstrations
and possibly in a clinical capstone course.
Students who have had experience with the rubric being
offered during this session verbalized appreciation when
the faculty member used the Not Applicable and Not
Observed categories versus the faculty member trying to
judge a student behavior they could not have possibly
observed.
Another example of a rating scale used at Keele
University (Priest, 1998) includes the descriptors:
Outstanding, Very Good, Good, Average, Poor,
Copyright held by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC 5
Reprinted with permission
Unacceptable, and Not Assessed.
When using a clinical performance rubric, use the
clinical rating scale already in use by the institution
where you work.
6-9
Faculty Guidelines
for Clinical Rubric Management
Give student a copy of the rubric
Allow student to review and ask questions
Checkmark the behaviors observed
Write comments in space available
Give student a copy of the rubric with feedback
Review your comments with the student
Faculty Guidelines for Clinical Rubric Management
PPT 6-9
The following guidelines were used when implementing
the clinical rubric as follows:
First each student received a copy of the rubric during
clinical orientation. They were given time to review the
behaviors and the layout of the rubric and were
encouraged to ask questions. Of course, since this was
their first clinical course they really did not know
exactly what to ask initially.
Second, faculty should checkmark each behavior they
observed and how they rated the quality of the student
performance (Satisfactory, Needs Improvement, or
Unsatisfactory). The faculty member then wrote
comments for every Needs Improvement and
Unsatisfactory rating. Positive comments about their
satisfactory performance are always appreciated by the
students.
Third, the faculty member should give the student a
copy of the rubric with the feedback prior to the next
clinical week. Faculty should then review their written
comments with the student ASAP to answer student
questions and to make sure the student is interpreting
faculty comments as the faculty member intended.
6-10
Example of Clinical Outcomes
1. Provide care for clients in a variety of settings based on the relationship of the client, health, and environment.
2. Demonstrate professional nursing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors in the delivery of person-oriented health care.
3. Apply critical thinking skills when caring for clients in a variety of settings.
4. Employ effective communication with clients, health team members, faculty, and peers.
5. Implement therapeutic nursing interventions to meet client needs.
Example of Clinical Outcomes PPT 6-10
Page 3 of Tab 6 in the participant notebook lists the
clinical outcomes from a clinical practice course. The
focus of the first outcome is client, health, and
environment. The second outcome focuses on nursing
and the individual. The focus of the third outcome is
critical thinking. The fourth is communication. The
fifth is therapeutic nursing interventions. The learning
outcomes of a specific course generally reflect the
nursing program outcomes.
Copyright held by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC 6
Reprinted with permission
6-11
Clinical Outcome 1.1a
Identifies disease processes, psychological and
sociocultural factors that affect the client's health
SatisfactoryThe student defines/describes patient’s primary medical diagnosis and/or surgical intervention.
Needs Improvement
The student defines patient’s medical diagnosis or surgical intervention with assistance of faculty.
UnsatisfactoryThe student is unable to identify patient’s primary medical diagnosis or surgical procedure.
Clinical Outcome 1.1a
Identifies disease processes, psychological and
sociocultural factors that affect the client’s health.
Example of a Rubric
PPT 6-11
The chart found on page 3 of the participant notebook
(Tab 6) and on the slide is a sample of how the
descriptors (Satisfactory, Needs Improvement and
Unsatisfactory) are differentiated for a clinical course
outcome 1, sub-objective 1a.
Satisfactory
The student defines/describes
patient’s primary medical
diagnosis and/or surgical
intervention.
Needs
Improvement
The student defines patient
medical diagnosis or surgical
intervention with assistance of
faculty.
Unsatisfactory
The student is unable to identify
patient’s primary medical
diagnosis or surgical procedure.
6-12
Patient Assessment
May accompany the nursing care plan and/or concept map
Graded weekly
One assessment per assigned patient
Configuration may vary
Patient Assessment PPT 6-12
The patient assessment form or tool is one of the most
common evaluative methods used to evaluate student
understanding, accuracy, and comprehensiveness. The
assessment form usually is accompanied by a
medication profile, a nursing care plan, or a concept
care map. The patient assessment form is typically
graded by the clinical faculty member with feedback.
There is a place on the clinical performance rubric to
indicate the quality of the student’s work. Typically one
assessment tool is required for each assigned patient.
Copyright held by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC 7
Reprinted with permission
6-13
Patient Assessment
Patient Demographics
Chief Complaint
History Current/Past Medical and Surgical
Allergies and Current Medications
IV Information
Laboratory, Diagnostic Tests, and Procedures
Physician Orders
Pathophysiology Review
Patient Assessment PPT 6-13
The patient assessment form or tool often contains the
following sections:
Patient Demographics; Chief Complaint; History
Current/Past Medical & Surgical; Allergies and Current
Medications; IV Information; Laboratory, Diagnostic
Tests, and Procedures; Physician Orders, &
Pathophysiology Review. How the patient assessment
tool is configured depends on course faculty preference.
6-14
Nursing Care Plan
Application of nursing process
Preparation for clinical experience
Standardized format
Key points for evaluation
Formative evaluation
Graded
Nursing Care Plan PPT 6-14
The nursing care plan (NCP) is the next most common
evaluative method used to evaluate student
understanding of the nursing process. The purpose of
the nursing care plan is to provide the student with a
plan of care for one patient problem that is to be
followed during the day. It is considered a working
document that, at the end of the clinical week, should
reflect changes to the plan as needed. A draft of the
student’s NCP should be reviewed in the AM of the first
clinical day of the week. This initial draft demonstrates
student preparedness and knowledge. The format for
the NCP is fairly standard and includes the nursing
diagnosis, outcomes, interventions, rationale, and
outcome evaluations. Remember patient outcomes are
behavioral changes that can be demonstrated and
measured and must be achieved within a specified time
frame. The key points of evaluation include the
following:
(a) The NCP is individualized for the patient.
(b) The NCP includes all parts in an organized
manner.
(c) Rationales help to demonstrate knowledge of
theory.
(d) The student should reference the rationale as
required by faculty.
The NCP is typically part of formative evaluation and is
graded by faculty with feedback. The clinical
performance rubric does include the NCP in outcome
#5.
Copyright held by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC 8
Reprinted with permission
6-15
Nursing Care Plans
Advantages
• Standard approach or format
• Thought to show critical thinking
• Helpful in learning to think like a nurse
Disadvantages
• Standardized care plans
• Use of critical thinking skills
• Linear approach
• Real nurses do not write care plans
Nursing Care Plans — Advantages and
Disadvantages
PPT 6-15
The advantages of the NCP are that it is a standardized
approach to demonstrating understanding of the nursing
process. It is a vehicle for demonstrating critical
thinking and reasoning, and it helps the student learn
how to think like a nurse. The disadvantages of the
NCP are that there are standardized care plans available,
which causes students to question the value of
developing others. If standard NCPs are used, does
critical thinking really occur? The traditional linear
NCP has been criticized by those who feel the nursing
process does not reflect nursing practice. And then
there is the attitude that ‘real nurses do not write care
plans,’ therefore why should the students.
6-16
Concept Maps
Diagrammatic strategy
Demonstrates relationships
Organizes data
Used in place of nursing care plans
Formative evaluation
Graded
Concept Maps PPT 6-16
A new and competing method of demonstrating
understanding of the nursing process and student
understanding of the ‘whole patient’ is the concept care
map. The concept map is a diagrammatic teaching
strategy that helps students to demonstrate how the
patient assessment tool is configured depending on
course faculty preference and the relationships between
data. The concept care map shows students’ ability to
organize a large amount of data. It takes the place of a
traditional NCP. It is also a part of students’ formative
evaluative process and is graded with feedback.
6-17
Concept Maps
Advantages
• Synthesis of knowledge
• Less writing
• Shows student understanding
Disadvantages
• Map may be large
• No two will be alike in format
• Attractiveness may influence assessment
Concept Maps — Advantages and Disadvantages
PPT 6-17
The advantages of the concept care map are that it is a
creative process that shows synthesis of information
data and requires less writing. The disadvantages of the
concept map are that it may be large and difficult to
follow, no two maps will be the same, and attractiveness
of the map may influence faculty evaluation of the
students’ abilities.
Copyright held by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC 9
Reprinted with permission
6-18
Concept Maps
Types of Maps
• Pathophysiologic Focus
• Nursing Care Focus
• Combination Pathophysiologic and Nursing Care Focus
Concept Maps — Types
PPT 6-18
Students can use the concept map format to demonstrate
understanding of the patient’s pathophysiologic
processes, the nursing process, or they can use the
format to demonstrate both the nursing process and the
pathophysiology behind the patient outcomes and
nursing interventions. The combined pathophysiologic
and nursing care concept map provides the student with
an opportunity to visualize and integrate theories with
the nursing process (Daley, 1999; Irvine, 1995; Kathol,
Geiger, & Hartig, 1996).
Concept Care Map
Show examples of concept care maps that you have
brought with you. Point out the resources listed in
Tab 11 for participants who want additional information
on concept care maps.
Tips for Concept Mapping
Both theory driven and an evidence-based teaching/learning strategy
Integral part of learning how to think like a nurse
Demonstrate how to construct a concept map
Use concept map to keep notes throughout shift
Assessment tool of student learning
Collaborative learning and critical thinking
6-19
(Torre, Durning, & Daley, 2013)
Tips for Concept Mapping
PPT 6-19
Here are six tips about concept mapping for faculty use
and student learning.
6-20
(Torre, Durning, & Daley, 2013)
Concept Map Example PPT 6-20
This figure can be used to teach students about the logic
of the concept map and how all parts are connected.
Copyright held by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC 10
Reprinted with permission
Concept Map Configurations
6-21 (Noonan, 2011)
Concept Map Configurations PPT 6-21
Concept maps can take on several configurations
depending on the purpose of the map.
6-22
Spinal Cord
Compression
Admission
Info
Assessment
Findings
4/17
#5
Risk for
Powerlessness
#2
Self-care
Deficits
#3
Risk of
Impaired
Skin
Integrity
#1
Impaired
Physical
Mobility
#4
Disturbed
Body
Image
Pathological
Effects
Meds for
Compression
Meds for
Constipation
Pathological
Effects
Sample Student Concept Map Framework
PPT 6-22
This is a basic framework of a concept map prepared by
a student. See the handout.
6-23
Clinical Evaluation Activity
Handouts Needed:
• Student Scenario
• Clinical Performance Rubric
• Patient Assessment Tool
• Nursing Care Plan
• Concept Care Map
Clinical Evaluation Activity — Introduction PPT 6-23
Divide the participants into groups of 2 to 4 persons
depending on room configuration. Use the instructions
on page 7 (Tab 6) of the participant notebook to
introduce the activity to the participants. Go through
the student scenario, and explain to the participants that
they are being asked to review the patient assessment
tool, the nursing care plan, and the concept care map.
Explain they are to use the portion of the clinical
performance rubric to record their evaluation of the
written work and add comments to the rubric for the
student. Give them about 15-20 minutes for the small
group to work and then move to the next slide to debrief
this activity.
Copyright held by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC 11
Reprinted with permission
6-24
Clinical Evaluation Activity
Issues
Concerns
Likes and Dislikes
What if…?
Clinical Evaluation Activity — Debrief
PPT 6-24
After the activity, offer the participants time to ask
questions, bring up any issues, concerns, their likes and
dislikes, and ask if they have any what if scenarios they
would like to explore.
6-25
Student Self-Evaluation
Clinical performance
Strengths
Areas of improvement
Strategies for improved performance
Student Self-Evaluation PPT 6-25
Students are now being asked to evaluate their clinical
performance weekly.
Sometimes faculty members ask the students to evaluate
themselves based on the clinical evaluation tool or the
clinical performance rubric. At other times faculty want
the students to examine what they learned, what their
strengths were, identify where they want to improve,
and how they plan to improve.
Many students have difficulty with this activity. They
often feel unsure what the faculty member wants to see
written. They do not know how to provide rationale or
supportive data when they say that they demonstrated
understanding of the patient’s medical diagnosis and
surgical procedure. Well, how did they do that, what
supportive information can they offer? Encourage your
students to give details, and if you do not get them to,
then send the evaluation back and indicate that you are
unable to evaluate what they have written and that you
need more information/examples. According to
Oermann and Gaberson (2014), students in the first
clinical course may need assistance with identifying
their strengths and areas needing improvement. Faculty
need to assist students in the identification of strategies
to improve their performance. The self-evaluation
process is only for formative evaluation and is not
graded, according to Oermann and Gaberson.
Copyright held by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC 12
Reprinted with permission
6-26
Student-Faculty Relationships
Positive relationships require:
• Confidence
• Respect
• Realistic clinical expectations
• Honest and direct
• Approachable
• Caring behaviors
• Support and encourage
Gaberson & Oermann, 2015
Student-Faculty Relationships
PPT 6-26
According to Gaberson and Oermann (2014), it is the
job of the clinical faculty to foster positive relationships
with their clinical students by displaying confidence in
the students, showing them respect, keeping clinical
expectations realistic (first clinical course behaviors vs.
the final clinical course behaviors), being honest with
them and direct when giving feedback, staying
approachable, displaying caring behaviors, and
remaining supportive and encouraging about potential
for improvement and growth.
With problem students, you should step back and make
sure you are not the problem. If you decide you might
be part of the problem, be honest with the student and
let them know what you will do to make changes and
then guide them to understand their responsibilities in
the change process. Make a commitment to help this
student to become the best nurse they can in the time
you have them. Of course, this may be difficult if you
have very short clinical rotations.
If you are sure the student may have difficulty being
successful no matter what you or the student does,
evaluate them weekly using the rubric, and keep them
informed. And remember to document, document, and
document. Document all student behavior that
demonstrates unsatisfactory performance.
6-27
Summary: What was accomplished?
Introduced a variety of clinical evaluation tools available to faculty.
Discussed the development and use of a clinical performance rubric.
Reviewed guidelines for providing clinical feedback to students.
Compared the traditional nursing care plan with the concept care map.
Discussed how to develop positive student-faculty relationships.
Practiced using the clinical performance rubric based on a case scenario.
Summary PPT 6-27
In conclusion, during this session we:
Introduced a variety of clinical evaluation tools
available to faculty
Discussed the development and use of a clinical
performance rubric
Reviewed guidelines for providing clinical feedback
to students
Compared the traditional nursing care plan with the
concept care map
Discussed how to develop positive student-faculty
relationships
Practiced using the clinical performance rubric based
on a student scenario and paperwork examples
Copyright held by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC 13
Reprinted with permission
The overall goal of this session was to help familiarize
you with the variety of methods of clinical evaluation
and to introduce you to the clinical performance rubric
and the concept care map. New clinical faculty are not
expected to be perfect at clinical evaluation so it is
important you keep in touch with the full-time or
permanent course faculty, ask lots of questions and ask
for their guidance as you begin your journey of clinical
evaluation. Remember, the student’s job is to learn and
the clinical faculty’s job is to be the student’s guide.
Good luck to each of you.
FILE: G-CFA Instructor Tab 6 Clinical Evaluation Tools