clinical genomics sub-team
DESCRIPTION
Clinical Genomics Sub-team. Sub-team is one of three that evolved out of the DIA Pharmacogenomics Standards Workshop. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Clinical Genomics Sub-team
• Sub-team is one of three that evolved out of the DIA Pharmacogenomics Standards Workshop.
• Workshop was product of collaborative effort between DIA, FDA, and several industry organizations (PWG, PhRMA, and BIO) and in follow-up to an earlier workshop (May 2002) that focused implication of PG and issues and application of these technologies in drug development and regulatory decision-making.
• Intent of this workshop was to provide forum for detailed review of the PDA proposal and draft guidance for PG Data Submissions. This guidance is intended to encourage voluntary submissions as well as submission of data in support of a regulatory decision-making.
Clinical Genomics Sub-team
• Broad sponsorship and involvement: HL7, CDISC, I3C, FDA
• Started with the use cases that were included in Backgrounder document from this meeting (put together to guide and stimulate discussion around FDA draft guidance document).
• Created a flow chart that based on a selected use case.
Compound XPhase IIb Efficacy
Study
Compound XPhase III Pivotal
Study
Peripheralblood
samples
Clinicaldata
Peripheral bloodmononuclear
cells before andafter treatment
Pharmogeneticanalyses: candidate
genes targeted basedon known metabolic
pathway
Gene ExpressionProfiling
SNPassociations to
safety andefficacy
paramters
Inclusioncriteria forPhase IIIpivotalstudy
Gene profilewith strongpredictive
accuracy forefficacy
Gene profilewith strongpredictive
accuracy forhypersenstivity
reaction
Submission toFDA
Peripheralblood
samples
Clinicaldata
Peripheral bloodmononuclear
cells before andafter treatment
Gene ExpressionProfiling
Reanalysis of alldata collected to
date
Product approval
Data frompharmagenetic
analysis conductedby other
researchers/companies: DNA
marker setprovisionally linked
with metabolicpathway for
Compound X
Treat Patients
Peripheralblood
samples
Clinicaldata
Pharmogeneticanalyses
EquivocalAssociation
Planning forCompound Y
Results ofreanalysisof genomic
data
Key Issues:
• Standards are important for pharmacogenomics submission data because – a) there is a large amount of data to handle; – b) it is necessary and desirable to compare across trials; and – c) need for consistency in review by various organizations
(biotechs, CROs, FDA).• In order to develop a recognizable standard in a short
timeframe, subteam has agreed we should not develop something totally new but rather adapt existing standards to our needs
• We need to increased our understanding of what the FDA wants to review. – Should we focus on the FDA required submissions or the
voluntary submissions? Is there a difference in scope?
Next steps
• Increase our understanding of what the FDA would like to see.
• Focus on one scenario (the microarray scenario).• Review and leverage work already done by SEND and
CDISC groups. FDA will likely want to integrate data from different sources through their viewing tools.
• Identify other existing standards that can be used.• Provide comments to FDA relevant to Draft Guidance• Harmonize with other relevant models