clinical reasoning apao
DESCRIPTION
Tambien les comparto esta otra sobre Clinical reasoning, parte del programa de Desarrollo de Habilidades Docentes Clinicas.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Clinical Reasoning
Jorge E. Valdez MD,MA.Dean
School of Medicine and Health Sciences
![Page 2: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Competencias
Técnicas Competencias
Intelectuales
Competencias
Analíticas y Creativas
Competencias en
Profesionalismo
1. Aplicación de habilidades clínicas.
2. Manejo de recursos diagnósticos3. Manejo terapéutico.4. Promoción de salud yprevención de la enfermedad.5. Habilidades de comunicación.6. Aplicación dehabilidades para el manejode la información.
7. Aplicación del entendimiento de las
Ciencias Básicas, Clínicas y Sociales para
la práctica clínica.
8. Razonamiento, juicio clínico y
toma de decisiones.
9. Desempeño del Médico dentro del sistema de salud.10. Ética y desarrollo personal.
Estructura Curricular Centrada en Competencias
![Page 3: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Objectives
• By the end of this lecture, students should be able to: – • Understand the need for clinical reasoning – • Define clinical reasoning – • Understand the clinical reasoning process
![Page 4: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Need for clinical reasoning
• People live longer with more chronic and complex problems.
• Health professionals are expected to be more responsible, to work with diverse teams, and to make more independent judgements and decisions.
• There is information overload because of instant access to information through computers.
• Doctors are frequently involved in complex situations, which require an increasing level of responsibility
![Page 5: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Definition:
• The thinking and/or decision-making processes that are used in clinical practiceHiggs and Jones 2000, Edwards et al 2004
Goal = “Wise Action”
![Page 6: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Clinical Reasoning• Refers to a process in which the therapist,
interacting with the patient, structures meaning, goals & health management strategies based on clinical data, client choices, professional judgment & knowledge (Higgs and Jones 2000)
• –Hypothesis oriented, collaborative and reflective• –Knowledge and organization of knowledge are
important
![Page 7: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Process of Clinical Reasoning
Theoretical Models of Reasoning1.Knowledge -Reasoning Integration (Schmidt et al
1990)2.Integrated Patient Centered Model (Higgs and
Jones 1995)3.Hypothetic–Deductive (Elsteinet al 1978)4.Pattern Recognition (Barrows &Feltovich1987)
![Page 8: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Knowledge –Reasoning Integration
• CR is not separate skill from knowledge and clinical skills
• Important for knowledge to be domain-specific• With increasing knowledge and reasoning skills
–knowledge structure changes (towards illness scripts)
(Schmidt et al 1990)
![Page 9: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Developing Expertise
• Knowledge acquisition and clinical reasoning go hand in hand.
• Occurs in stages• Novice →Intermediate
→Experts
![Page 10: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Developing Expertise
Level Knowledge Representation Knowledge structure
Novice Networks Knowledge growth and validation
Interm Networks Encapsulation
Expert Illness Scripts Illness Script formation (instantiated scripts)
BoshuizenH & Schmidt HG (2000)
![Page 11: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Developing ExpertiseLevel Clinical Reasoning Control Required Demand (Cogn.)
Novice Long chains of detailed reasoning
Active monitoring each step
High
Interm Reasoning thru’Encapsulated network
Active monitoring each step
Med
Expert Illness script activation and instantiation
Monitoring at level of script
Low
![Page 12: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Integrated Patient-Centred Model
• Involves 3 core elements –Knowledge –Cognition –Metacognition
• Incorporates mutual decision making process with the patient
• Contextual interaction (situation/ environment)
![Page 13: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Knowledge• Biomedical knowledge• Clinical knowledge• Everyday knowledge• Increase growth of knowledge
needs to be organized to be useful
![Page 14: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Cognition
• Perception of relevant from irrelevant information
• Interpretation of information and hypothesis testing
• Inquiry strategies (hypothesis testing)
• Weighting and synthesis of information
![Page 15: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Metacognition
• Therapist‘s awareness, self-monitoring and reflective processes
• Thinking about your thinking
![Page 16: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Reflection
“To be conscience that you are ignorant is a great step to knowledge”
Benjamin Disraeli (1835-1910)
![Page 17: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Narrative Reasoning
• Understanding the patient’sIllness experiences“stories”Meaning perspectivesContextsBeliefs Cultures
![Page 18: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Using Narrative Reasoning
• Patient wants to return to his job• Shows up for all clinical appointments and does
everything that is asked of him during appointment
• Does not “get around”to doing the exercises at home
• Without exercises, treatment will not be successful• How do we proceed?
![Page 19: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Integrated Patient-Centred Model
The client´s input
Knowledge
Metacognition
Cognition
The clinical problem The enviroment
![Page 20: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Integrated Patient-Centred Model
![Page 21: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning
• Analytic process of reasoning (Eva 2004)• “Backward Reasoning”• Relation between the signs and symptoms and
diagnosis
![Page 22: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning
• Hypothesis generating and testing involves both inductive and deductive reasoning
• –Induction -to generate the hypothesis• –Deductive -to test hypothesis
![Page 23: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning
Pros• Thorough• Organized• Appears to be a skill
that can be taught to novice clinicians
Cons• Slow• Too much data can
leave reasoner without a direction.
![Page 24: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Collaborative reasoning
• Shared decision making between the therapist and the client
• Client’s opinion actively sought and utilized
![Page 25: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Pattern Recognition• Direct automatic retrieval of information from
a well organized knowledge base• Seeing a case that strongly resembles a case
seen in the past
![Page 26: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Pattern Recognition
• Direct automatic retrieval of information from a well organized knowledge base
• Seeing a case that strongly resembles a case seen in the past
![Page 27: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
• Non-analytic process of reasoning• “Forward Reasoning”• Illness Scripts• Intuition• Tends to occur unconsciously
Pattern Recognition
![Page 28: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Pattern Recognition
Pros•Fast•Conclusions can be
reached with imprecise data
Cons•Lacks certainty•Need exposure to
pattern in order to recognize
![Page 29: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Overview of clinical reasoning process
• This process can be represented by an upward and outward spiral, and is a cyclical (iterative) and developing process. Each loop of the spiral involves: – Data input – Data interpretation (or re-
interpretation) – Problem formulation (or re-formulation) – It aims to achieve a progressively
broader and deeper understanding of the clinical problem, and finally to make decisions and to take actions.
![Page 30: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Efficacy of a clinical reasoning process relies on:
• Health care professional’s reasoning proficiency
• client’s participation in clinical decision making
![Page 31: Clinical reasoning apao](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081513/55852254d8b42ae4748b4d43/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The outcomes of the clinical reasoning process can be affected by:
• Internal factors relating to health professionals, e.g. knowledge base, familiarity and experience with this type of case, reasoning skills
• Factors relating to the client, e.g. needs, communication skills, circumstances, choices
• External factors, e.g. institutional expectations, profession-specific frameworks of operation, complexity of the case