closed session auckland transport prioritisation process · board meeting | 25 march 2014 agenda...
TRANSCRIPT
Board Meeting | 25 March 2014 Agenda item no.7vi
Closed Session
Auckland Transport Prioritisation Process Recommendation That the Board:
i. Endorse the Prioritisation Process for transport investment for the next 3 decades as outlined in this paper and associated attachments.
Executive summary A process is currently underway between Auckland Transport (AT), the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) and Auckland Council (AC) to identify a 10, 20 and 30 year set of projects and activities designed to optimise transport benefits for any given capital and operating funding envelope.
Programme optimisation has involved a prioritisation process aimed at achieving the strategic transport outcomes in the Auckland Plan. This process has been undertaken in collaboration with AC and NZTA, and builds on the One System approach outlined in the first ITP.
The prioritisation process is described below and is the basis for the next iteration of the Integrated Transport Programme (ITP).
The first 10 years of the ITP will comprise the prioritised projects and programmes for the LTP and RLTP and will be subsequently assessed on a project-by-project basis under NZTA prioritisation criteria for funding eligibility. Projects will also be subject to further AT feasibility and funding reviews as part of the usual project development process.
Consultation with elected representatives from Council is planned to begin at the end of March 2014 – ahead of the 2015 RLTP and LTP processes.
The purpose of this report is to seek the Board’s endorsement and feedback on the process outlined in Attachments 1, 2 and 3.
Background The prioritisation process currently underway will inform the 30 year ITP and the 10 year LTP and RLTP. It is intended to deliver the transport response to the strategic transport outcomes outlined in the Auckland Plan.
The process has been informed by AT priorities articulated in documents including the Regional Public Transport Plan 2013, updated Rapid Transit Network, updated Rail Development Strategy, and draft Parking Discussion Document as well as programmes such as Network Operating Plans and Corridor Management Plans. Relevant NZTA documents include Transport Solutions for a Thriving New Zealand and Auckland State Highway Future Directions.
Prioritisation Process The prioritisation process undertaken is presented in Attachment 1 and is summarised in the following diagram:
Board Meeting | 25 March 2014 Agenda item no.7vi
Closed Session
Steps undertaken include:
• Development of a Vision Statement, Problem Definition, Benefits Identification
• Identification of performance indicators and measures
• Assessment of project dependencies, readiness to proceed and consenting timeframes/requirements.
• Assessment of the funding envelope for capital and operational requirements
• Rationalisation and development of a consolidated list of programmes and projects across AT and NZTA
• Definition of a ‘Committed Programme’ of projects and activities
• Development of a ‘Core Programme’ of projects and activities based on the estimated 30 year CAPEX financial envelope and informed by a ranking process, deficiency analysis and testing through transport modelling.
As part of developing the prioritisation process, the attached draft Investment Logic Map (Attachment 2) and draft Strategic Framework (Attachment 3) have been developed jointly with Council and NZTA.
The outcome of the prioritisation process will be a programme of investment that represents the best strategic fit and effectiveness to meet the outcomes of the AP.
NZTA prioritisation process and other considerations While the attached process is intended to identify which projects should be included within the draft ITP, a separate NZTA prioritisation process needs to be undertaken to determine
Board Meeting | 25 March 2014 Agenda item no.7vi
Closed Session
whether a particular AT project will be part-funded by NZTA under the GPS. The timing and content of the programme may need to be adjusted following this process to make best use of the available NZTA funds.
Other factors will also impact on the timing and content of the programme – including project dependencies, readiness to proceed and consenting timeframes / requirements.
Discussions are underway with NZTA to ensure that as far as possible, the prioritisation process described in this document and the NZTA prioritisation process result in the same outcomes.
Next steps Endorsement and any feedback from the Board will:
i. Inform the finalisation of the prioritisation processes; and
ii. Support the development of the ‘Core Programme’ of projects and activities.
The contents of the first-cut ‘Core Programme’ and the modelling results from this programme will be presented to the Board in the second quarter of 2014. A draft ITP will be submitted to the Board in the third quarter of 2014.
Attachments Number Description 1 Prioritisation – 13 March 2014 presentation to the Auckland Transport Capital
Review Committee 2 ITP Investment Logic Map 3 ITP Strategic Framework
Board Meeting | 25 March 2014 Agenda item no.7vi
Closed Session
Document ownership Submitted by Mohini Nair
Manager Strategic Transport Planning
Recommended by Peter Clark General Manager Strategy and Planning
Approved for submission
David Warburton Chief Executive
Glossary
Acronym Description Business Unit AT Auckland Transport CBG Consensus Building Group Council Auckland Council CRC Capital Review Committee ITP Integrated Transport Programme NZTA New Zealand Transport Agency RLTP Regional Land Transport Programme
Prio
ritis
atio
n
2
Hol
ding
pen
Prio
ritis
ed li
st
NZT
A 8
lega
cy c
ounc
ils
800
proj
ects
600
proj
ects
200
proj
ects
400
proj
ects
400
proj
ects
ITP
Filte
r 1
Filte
r 2
Filte
r 3
Filte
r 4
Auck
land
Pla
n
Rat
iona
lisat
ion
Com
mitt
ed P
rogr
amm
e
Cor
e P
rogr
amm
e - f
undi
ng,
defic
ienc
y, g
row
th,
mod
ellin
g, in
itial
rank
ing
Prio
ritis
atio
n
Est
ablis
hmen
t and
da
ta c
olle
ctio
n
~100
0 pr
ojec
ts
Cur
rent
AT
proj
ects
3
Est
ablis
hmen
t & D
ata
Col
lect
ion
•Te
mpl
ate
sent
out
to e
ight
func
tiona
l
wor
kstre
ams
for i
nput
/feed
back
–
AT/N
ZTA/
AC
•20
wor
ksho
ps w
ith A
T/N
ZTA/
AC s
ubje
ct
mat
ter e
xper
ts
PUR
POSE
- D
evel
op th
e pr
oces
s to
est
ablis
h th
e ‘O
ne L
ist’
of le
gacy
, NZT
A an
d
Auck
land
Pla
n pr
ojec
ts
•D
ata
colle
ctio
n w
orks
tream
set
up
(AT/
NZT
A)
•C
apex
and
ope
x te
mpl
ates
dev
elop
ed a
nd p
re-p
opul
ated
(pro
ject
nam
e,
desc
riptio
n, p
robl
em s
tate
men
t, co
sts,
pha
sing
, dep
ende
ncie
s, lo
cal b
oard
etc
)
OU
TCO
ME
– Th
e ‘O
ne L
ist’
(800
pro
ject
s)
4
Filte
r 1 -
Rat
iona
lisat
ion
PUR
POSE
– R
emov
e du
plic
ates
and
pro
ject
s pl
anne
d fo
r com
plet
ion
•O
ngoi
ng p
roce
ss o
f upd
atin
g an
d im
prov
ing
proj
ect i
nfor
mat
ion
with
AT/
NZT
A/AC
•U
pdat
e an
d co
rrec
t pro
ject
cos
ts a
nd p
hasi
ng
•AT
long
-term
pla
nnin
g da
taba
se b
eing
dev
elop
ed fo
r pro
ject
info
rmat
ion
goin
g
forw
ard
•Ex
ampl
e of
dup
licat
e –
AT p
lan
chan
ge o
blig
atio
ns d
uplic
atin
g pr
ojec
ts th
at
alre
ady
exis
ted
in th
e lis
t
OU
TCO
ME
– R
atio
nalis
ed li
st o
f 600
pro
ject
s (fr
om 8
00 p
roje
cts)
5
Filte
r 2 –
Com
mitt
ed P
rogr
amm
e
PUR
POSE
– D
evel
op th
e ‘C
omm
itted
Pro
gram
me’
•C
omm
itted
pro
ject
s de
fined
as:
−A
lread
y co
ntra
ctua
lly c
omm
itted
(e.g
. NO
RS
GA
, EM
Us)
−A
lmos
t cer
tain
ly w
ill b
e co
ntra
ctua
lly c
omm
itted
by
30 J
une
2015
(e.g
. Alb
any
Hw
y,
the
Auc
klan
d P
acka
ge)
−P
rogr
amm
es w
here
it is
diff
icul
t/illo
gica
l to
avoi
d th
e ex
pend
iture
(e.g
. saf
ety
impr
ovem
ents
, loc
al b
oard
initi
ativ
es)
−P
roje
cts
with
a d
ocum
ente
d im
pera
tive
to d
eliv
er (e
.g. h
ighe
st p
riorit
y ro
adin
g
proj
ects
from
the
RLT
P, C
RL)
−O
ther
‘mis
sion
crit
ical
’ pro
ject
s (e
.g. m
inim
al le
vel c
ross
ing
rem
oval
pro
gram
me)
−A
dditi
onal
pro
ject
s th
at a
re d
epen
denc
ies
for a
ny o
f the
abo
ve
•W
orks
hop
held
30
Oct
201
3 to
dev
elop
the
com
mitt
ed li
st -
AT/
NZT
A/AC
6
Filte
r 2 –
Com
mitt
ed P
rogr
amm
e
OU
TCO
ME
– C
omm
itted
Pro
gram
me
- 200
pro
ject
s
Exam
ple
proj
ects
in
clud
ed in
Com
mitt
ed
Prog
ram
me:
•
City
Rai
l Lin
k •
SH
1 P
uhoi
to W
arw
orth
R
ON
S
•A
ME
TI (P
anm
ure
to
Pak
uran
ga)
•‘M
ini’
Eas
t-Wes
t Lin
k •
Min
imum
rail
leve
l cr
ossi
ng s
epar
atio
n pr
ogra
mm
e
Exam
ple
proj
ects
in
Hol
ding
Pen
: •
AM
ETI
bus
way
P
akur
anga
to B
otan
y •
AWH
C
•A
irpor
t Rai
l •
SH
1 W
arkw
orth
to
Wel
lsfo
rd R
ON
S
•E
nhan
ced
Eas
t-Wes
t Li
nk
•N
orth
-Wes
tern
bus
way
Dec
ade
1 D
ecad
e 2
Dec
ade
3
Capex
Committed
7
Filte
r 2 –
Com
mitt
ed C
AP
EX
AT +
NZT
A +
Kiw
iRai
l (20
15-2
045)
AC
Fam
ily O
nly
(201
5-20
45)
8
Filte
r 3 -
Tran
spor
t Mod
ellin
g an
d D
efic
ienc
y A
naly
sis
PUR
POSE
– m
odel
ling
and
defic
ienc
y re
view
of t
he C
omm
itted
Pro
gram
me
to
iden
tify
netw
ork
perfo
rman
ce a
nd s
ugge
st w
here
add
ition
al p
roje
cts
from
the
‘hol
ding
pen’
may
impr
ove
resu
lts
•Tr
ansp
ort m
odel
ling
used
as
a to
ol to
test
the
impa
ct o
f pro
gram
mes
aga
inst
key
indi
cato
rs (t
rave
l tim
es, c
onge
stio
n le
vels
, PT
patro
nage
)
•Tr
ansp
ort m
odel
refin
emen
t and
upd
atin
g (e
.g. r
efin
e, u
pdat
e an
d co
rrec
t lan
d
use
to re
flect
Uni
tary
Pla
n, u
pdat
e b
us la
ne a
ssum
ptio
ns)
•In
dica
tors
ben
chm
arke
d in
tern
atio
nally
•R
esul
ts c
ompa
re 2
011
with
202
1 &
2041
•D
efic
ienc
y w
orks
hop
9
Filte
r 3 -
Tran
spor
t Mod
ellin
g E
xam
ple
- bus
lane
s 20
45 –
Cor
e P
rogr
amm
e 20
11
10
Filte
r 3 –
Initi
al R
anki
ng
PUR
POSE
– re
view
pro
ject
s in
the
hold
ing
pen
to u
nder
stan
d w
hich
may
be
the
high
est
prio
rity
for i
nclu
sion
in th
e C
ore
Prog
ram
me
•Pr
ojec
ts ra
nked
Hig
h/M
ediu
m/L
ow a
gain
st th
ree
defin
ed c
riter
ia:
−St
rate
gic
fit a
gain
st IT
P be
nefit
s −
Effe
ctiv
enes
s of
del
iver
ing
trans
port
bene
fits/
outc
omes
−
ITP
Four
-sta
ge In
terv
entio
n H
iera
rchy
•
11 ra
nkin
g w
orks
hops
hel
d in
Nov
/Dec
201
3 w
ith e
ight
func
tiona
l wor
kstre
ams
(AT/
NZT
A)
•R
anki
ng re
sults
als
o us
ed to
che
ck “s
ensi
bilit
y” o
f the
Com
mitt
ed P
rogr
amm
e
11
Filte
r 3 –
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t and
O
ther
Con
side
ratio
ns
PUR
POSE
– re
view
pro
ject
s in
the
hold
ing
pen
to u
nder
stan
d w
hich
may
be
the
high
est
prio
rity
for i
nclu
sion
in th
e C
ore
Prog
ram
me
•A
sset
man
agem
ent m
odel
ling
to d
eter
min
e le
vels
of s
ervi
ce a
nd a
lloca
tion
of o
pex
and
cape
x •
Addi
tiona
l pro
ject
s al
so id
entif
ied
as p
riorit
ies
for C
ore
Prog
ram
me
thro
ugh
revi
ew o
f: −
Exis
ting
stra
tegi
c do
cum
ents
(dra
ft Pa
rkin
g St
rate
gy, R
TN R
evie
w, R
ail D
evel
opm
ent S
trate
gy,
RPT
P)
−H
ousi
ng A
ccor
d pr
ojec
ts
−Se
quen
cing
of g
reen
field
s −
Auck
land
Cou
ncil
geog
raph
ic p
riorit
ies
12
Filte
r 3 –
Cor
e P
rogr
amm
e
OU
TCO
ME
– C
ore
Prog
ram
me
(400
pro
ject
s)
Exam
ple
addi
tiona
l pr
ojec
ts:
•P
ark
and
Rid
e pr
ogra
mm
e •
Enh
ance
d bu
slan
e ne
twor
k •
Rai
l to
the
Airp
ort
•M
t Ros
kill
Rai
l Spu
r •
AWH
C
•A
ME
TI b
usw
ay
•N
orth
ern
Bus
way
im
prov
emen
ts
•N
orth
Wes
tern
Bus
RTN
•
TIG
A pr
ojec
ts in
clud
ed in
se
cond
and
third
dec
ades
•
Reg
iona
l arte
rial a
nd s
tate
hi
ghw
ay im
prov
emen
ts
Exam
ple
proj
ects
in
Hol
ding
Pen
: •
Enh
ance
d W
alki
ng a
nd
Cyc
ling
prog
ram
me
•In
crea
sed
fund
ing
for
plac
emak
ing
and
urba
n de
sign
impr
ovem
ents
•
Full A
vond
ale-
Sou
thdo
wn
rail
line
and
Airp
ort R
ail L
oop
•Li
ght R
ail
•A
dditi
onal
fund
ing
to
rem
ove
all r
ail l
evel
cr
ossi
ngs
Dec
ade
1 D
ecad
e 2
Dec
ade
3
Capex
Core
13
Filte
r 3 –
Cor
e P
rogr
amm
e AC
Fam
ily O
nly
(201
5-20
45)
AT +
NZT
A +
Kiw
iRai
l (20
15-2
045)
14
Filte
r 4 –
Prio
ritis
atio
n
•Tr
ansp
ort m
odel
ling
of fi
rst c
ut C
ore
Pro
gram
me
•C
onve
rt fil
ter 3
out
puts
into
stra
tegi
c fit
and
effe
ctiv
enes
s re
sults
for a
ll pr
ojec
ts.
Stra
tegi
c
fit a
nd e
ffect
iven
ess
asse
ssed
aga
inst
the
follo
win
g:
•C
ost b
enef
it an
alys
is to
be
unde
rtake
n fo
r the
firs
t dec
ade
proj
ects
as
part
of th
e R
LTP
proc
ess
Incr
ease
d ac
cess
to a
w
ider
rang
e of
af
ford
able
tran
spor
t ch
oice
s
Auck
land
's tr
ansp
ort
syst
em m
oves
peo
ple
and
good
s ef
ficie
ntly
Bet
ter u
se o
f tra
nspo
rt
reso
urce
s to
max
imis
e re
turn
on
exis
ting
asse
ts
Auck
land
's tr
ansp
ort
syst
em b
ette
r con
nect
s co
mm
uniti
es a
nd
supp
orts
a h
igh
qual
ity
urba
n fo
rm
Impr
oved
saf
ety
of
Auck
land
's tr
ansp
ort
syst
em
Red
uced
adv
erse
en
viro
nmen
tal e
ffect
s fr
om A
uckl
and'
s tr
ansp
ort s
yste
m
OU
TCO
ME
– re
fresh
ed C
ore
Prog
ram
me
list o
f pro
ject
s –
with
sup
porti
ng m
odel
ling
resu
lts +
stra
tegi
c fit
and
effe
ctiv
enes
s re
sults
15
Filte
r 4 -
Prio
ritis
atio
n E
xam
ple
Proj
ect
Dom
inio
n R
oad
Cor
ridor
Upg
rade
Prim
ary
tran
spor
t res
pons
eB
ette
r use
of t
rans
port
reso
urce
s to
m
axim
ise
retu
rn o
n ex
istin
g as
sets
ITP
inve
stm
ent h
iera
chy
4. In
vest
men
t in
new
infra
stru
ctur
e, s
ervi
ces
and
tech
nolo
gy
Incr
ease
d ac
cess
to a
wid
er ra
nge
of a
fford
able
tran
spor
t ch
oice
s++
Impr
oves
attr
activ
enes
s an
d ca
paci
ty o
f pub
lic tr
ansp
ort.
B
us la
nes
inte
nded
to im
prov
e P
T tra
vel t
imes
and
re
liabi
lity.
Pro
ject
incl
udes
pro
visi
on o
f cyc
le la
nes
on
adja
cent
stre
ets.
Auck
land
's tr
ansp
ort s
yste
m m
oves
peo
ple
and
good
s ef
ficie
ntly
n/a
Bet
ter u
se o
f tra
nspo
rt re
sour
ces
to m
axim
ise
retu
rn o
n ex
istin
g as
sets
++P
roje
ct h
as b
een
desi
gned
to d
eliv
er m
axim
um b
enef
its
with
in a
con
stra
ined
pro
ject
fund
ing
enve
lope
.
Auck
land
’s tr
ansp
ort s
yste
m b
ette
r con
nect
s co
mm
uniti
es a
nd
supp
orts
a h
igh
qual
ity u
rban
form
++P
roje
ct in
volv
es u
pgra
des
to th
ree
villa
ge c
entre
s (M
t R
oski
ll, B
alm
oral
and
Ede
n Va
lley)
alo
ng th
e ro
ute.
P
roje
ct is
inte
nded
to s
uppo
rt pr
ojec
ted
popu
latio
n gr
owth
in th
e Au
ckla
nd is
thm
us.
Impr
oved
saf
ety
of A
uckl
and'
s tr
ansp
ort s
yste
mn/
aC
ycle
lane
s w
ill im
prov
e cy
clis
t saf
ety,
how
ever
cyc
le
lane
impr
ovem
ents
cap
ture
d in
tran
spor
t cho
ices
ca
tego
ry a
bove
.
Red
uced
adv
erse
env
ironm
enta
l effe
cts
from
Auc
klan
d's
tran
spor
t sys
tem
+P
roje
ct in
volv
es in
itiat
ives
to im
prov
e th
e at
tract
iven
ess
/ up
take
of p
ublic
tran
spor
t and
act
ive
mod
es.
Stra
tegi
c Fi
tH
Asse
ssed
Ef
fect
iven
ess
HEf
ficie
ncy
(BC
R)
1.7
16
Stra
tegi
c Fi
t and
E
ffect
iven
ess
Ben
efit
/ Cos
t - +
- +
CR
L
Rou
te
Opt
imis
atio
n
AM
ETI
Dom
inio
n R
oad
Alb
any
Hw
ay
Rai
l to
Airp
ort
Puk
ekoh
e E
lect
rific
atio
n Saf
ety
prog
ram
mes
AWH
C
Sta
te H
wy
impr
ovem
ents
Rai
l Lev
el
Cro
ssin
g re
mov
als
Ark
les
Bay
, U
pper
Har
bour
Fe
rry S
ervi
ces
Sel
wyn
Rai
l S
tatio
n
Rai
l ext
ensi
ons
to K
umeu
and
Tu
akau
Lega
cy ro
adin
g pr
ojec
ts
City
Cen
tre B
us
Impr
ovem
ents
Prio
ritis
atio
n M
atrix
17
Nex
t Ste
ps
•W
eigh
tings
with
in th
e pr
iorit
isat
ion
proc
ess?
•Al
ignm
ent o
f AT
and
NZT
A St
rate
gic
Fit,
Effe
ctiv
enes
s an
d Ef
ficie
ncy
proc
esse
s
•M
arch
AT
Boar
d m
eetin
g
•C
ost B
enef
it as
sess
men
t of p
roje
cts
incl
uded
with
in th
e fir
st 1
0 ye
ars
•M
ay C
RC
mee
ting
– pr
iorit
isat
ion
mat
rix c
ompl
eted
BENEFIT PROBLEM STRATEGIC RESPONSE
Investor: Facilitator:
Accredited Facilitator:
Version no: Initial Workshop: Last modified by:
Template version:
Auckland Transport/NZTA/Auckland Council
Integrated Transport Programme (ITP) DRAFT
INVESTMENT LOGIC MAP
<e.g. 0.1, 1.0 etc> <dd/mm/yyyy> <firstname surname dd/mm/yyyy > 5.0
The cost of transport in Auckland is rising, and
investment needs to be managed in a way that is affordable for users and
providers.
Poor quality and underdeveloped public transport, walking and
cycling networks result in limited transport options
and poor resiliency.
Projected congestion and travel time reliability will impact on the efficiency
of business and time sensitive freight travel.
Projected population and employment growth
needs to be accommodated in a way that supports achieving a
quality urban form.
Better use of transport resources to maximise
return on existing assets
Increased access to a wider range of affordable
transport choices
Auckland’s transport system moves people and goods efficiently
Auckland’s transport system better connects
communities and supports a high quality
urban form
• Apply the ITP Four Stage Intervention Hierarchy
• Complete identified missing links in the network
• Invest in intelligent transport systems to make best use of the network and provide better information to users
• Invest in multimodal improvements to the transport system where they provider wider network benefits
• Invest to deliver the transformational move to an outstanding public transport system noted in the Auckland Plan
• Increase investment in Walking & Cycling initiatives and travel planning
• Improve walking & cycling access to Public Transport
• Provide park-and-ride in suitable locations
• Prioritise investments which target freight and public transport congestion
• Invest in selected projects and TDM initiatives that ease severe congestion
• Provide transport infrastructure and services in a way that supports Auckland’s growth areas, placemaking and a high quality urban form
The widespread use of private vehicles creates adverse environmental
[and health] effects.
• Increase investment in Walking & Cycling initiatives
• Implement Travel Demand Management initiatives
Transport related fatalities and serious
injuries results in high social costs for Aucklanders.
Reduced adverse environmental effects
from Auckland’s transport system
Improved safety of Auckland’s transport
system
• Invest in projects and programmes that improve the safety and personal security of Auckland’s transport system, particularly focussing on initiatives that reduce road crash fatalities and serious injuries
Attachment 2
Key
Modellable measure
Measure to be documented outside models
Measure to be monitored over time
Benefit Desired outcomes Investment KPI Measure
Services that align with future land-use patterns Increase the proportion of Aucklanders living within walking distance of frequent public transport Percentage of households within 500m walk of the RTN and FTN
Increase the proportion of Aucklanders living within walking distance of public transport Percentage of households within 500m walk of a PT stop
Increase the proportion of PT customers who are satisfied with their service Percentage of customers satisfied with their PT service
Increased use of the PT system Total passenger boardings pa
Increase Aucklander's average use of the PT network Annual passenger boardings per capita pa
Increased PT trips generated by Park and Rides PT trips generated by Park and Rides in the AM Peak
Increased PT mode share Increase the proportion of people accessing the CBD by PT Percentage of peak period motorised trips to city centre made by public transport
Reduced public transport travel times Average in vehicle travel time
Increased public transport travel speeds Average bus speed (in vehicle) on the Frequent Network during the AM peak
Reduced delay to PT services due to severe congestion Proportion of PT hours spent in severe congestion (peak and interpeak)
Percentage of rail services that arrive at their final destination within 5 minutes of schedule
Percentage of bus services that commence their journeys within 5 minutes of their
timetabled start
Increased reliability of PT services Percentage of timetabled services that were operated and reached their final destination
Increase the farebox recovery ratio to 50% Farebox recovery ratio (fare revenue divided by total PT costs)
Operating subsidy per passenger KM
Reduced private vehicle dependency Reduced private car VKT per capita (daily) Private car VKT per capita (daily)
Improved affordability of transport Reduced proportion of household expenditure on transportProportion of household expenditure spent on transport - from the Household Economic
Survey
A significant increase in the use of active transport modes Increased active transport mode share Proportion of total trips made by active modes (walking and cycling) in the AM peak
Minimised delay due to severe congestion Proportion of hours spent in severe congestion by private vehicles (peak and interpeak)
Average network vehicle speeds are maintained at acceptable levels in a growing Auckland Average vehicle speed during the AM Peak
Average vehicle speeds on the Strategic Freight Network are maintained at acceptable levels in a
growing AucklandAverage vehicle speed on the Strategic Freight Network (AM Peak and interpeak)
More efficient freight supply chains Reduced delay to freight vehicles due to severe congestionProportion of freight travel in severe congestion on the strategic freight network (peak and
interpeak)
Transport investments support Auckland's economic aspirations Improved agglomeration of economic activity
The Auckland transport network is able to cope with unexpected events
Improve / maintain travel time reliability
Missing links in the state highway, local road and public transport networks are
filled
Wider network benefits are achieved through smaller investments in existing
assets
One System initiatives (including JTOC) are implemented to optimise use of the
road network
Assets that are critical, front-of-house, high risk or have significant public perception / traffic
movement implications must be maintained in a very good, good or moderate conditionAsset condition rating
No assets with moderate risk and public perception implications are allowed to fall into a very poor
stateAsset condition rating
Initiatives are progressed that provide 'right sized solutions'
Transport investments support development in special housing areas
Transport investments support development in priority infill growth areas and
supports the achievement of a quality compact urban form (including locations
with approved Plan Changes)
The proportion of jobs accessible to Aucklander's living in the priority greenfield growth
areas that are within 30mins of their homes by car (AM Peak)
The proportion of jobs accessible to Aucklander's living in the priority greenfield growth
areas that are within 45 and 60 mins of their homes by public transport (AM Peak)
Percentage of people who can get to the CBD in 45 mins by PT
Percentage of people who can get to their nearest Metropolitan Centre in 45 mins: 1) by car
and 2) by PT
Percentage or people who can get to their nearest town centre in 45 mins: 1) by car and 2) by
PT
The proportion of jobs accessible to Aucklander's within 30mins of their homes by car (AM
Peak)
The proportion of jobs accessible to Aucklander's within 45 and 60 mins of their homes by
public transport (AM Peak)
Transport investments align with Auckland Council's geographic priorities
(particularly the Southern Initiative and City Centre)
Reduced financial burden of transport for those most in need
Improved accessibility for young people and Maori (to employment and other activities)
Improved Maori social wellbeing
Transport investments contribute to 'place-making' in centres or otherwise help
to achieve Auckland's aspirations to have a high quality urban form
Fatal and serious injuries per capita on roads per annum (per 100,000 population)
Total annual road crash fatalities and serious injuries
Total annual injury crashes (to be split by road type)
Improved personal security on the Auckland transport system Improved public transport safety and securitySafety and security incidents across public transport per annum, per 100,000 passenger
boardings
Reduced greenhouse gas emissions Reduced greenhouse gas emissions from transport sources Greenhouse gas emissions from transport sources (daily)
Reduced air pollution (PM10, VOC & Nox) from transport sources PM10, VOC & Nox particulate emissions from transport sources (daily)
Average quality of stormwater from the transport network discharged into waterways
Number of stormwater treatment devices per lane KM
Proportion of total trips made by cycling in the AM peak
Proportion of total trips made by walking in the AM peak
Total fuel consumption from the transport fleet
Per capita fuel consumption from the transport fleet
Increased use of renewable transport fuels Increased use of renewable transport fuels
Improved safety of
Auckland's transport
system
Easing of severe urban congestion
Increased health through higher levels of active transport
Increased access to a
wider range of affordable
transport choices
Reduced adverse
environmental effects
from Auckland's
transport system
Services that meet customer needs
Increased passenger numbers
Improved PT value for money
Auckland's transport
system better connects
communities and
supports a high quality
urban form
Better use of transport
resources to maximise
return on existing assets
Transport investments support Auckland Council's social and cultural aspirations
and focuses on those most in need
Improvements to the Auckland transport system are delivered which reduce
serious injuries and fatalities
Increased fuel resilience
Reduced air and water pollutants and harmful emissions
Improved connectivity for the city centre, metropolitan centres and town centres
Improved accessibility to employment Aucklanders have improved accessibility to more jobs
Reduced fatal and serious injuries
Reduced fuel consumption from the Auckland transport fleet
Improved stormwater quality
Increase the total amount of walking and cycling Aucklanders undertake as part of their transport
journeys
Development is supported in priority greenfield growth areas Aucklanders living in the priority greenfield growth areas have access to a number of jobs
More Aucklanders have access to key destinations
Attachment 3
Auckland's transport assets are renewed and maintained optimally
ITP Strategic Framework (draft)
Faster public transport and reduced journey times
Improved network resilience and travel time reliability
Auckland's transport
system moves people
and goods efficiently
Improved reliability of public transport servicesIncreased punctuality of PT services
Benefit
Improved safety of
Auckland's transport
system
Increased access to a
wider range of affordable
transport choices
Reduced adverse
environmental effects
from Auckland's
transport system
Auckland's transport
system better connects
communities and
supports a high quality
urban form
Better use of transport
resources to maximise
return on existing assets
Attachment 3
Auckland's transport
system moves people
and goods efficiently
Example projects / initiatives that may respond to the identified benefits and desired outcomes Pre-existing strategic document
AT Sustainability Policy (AT - currently WIP)
Auckland Plan (AC - published)
TIGA Review
Unitaty Plan (AC - notified)
- invest in projects and ongoing programmes that improve the safety of the Auckland transport system, in particular
focussing on initiatives that reduce road crash fatalities and serious injuries
- EMUs
- Pukekohe Electrification
- CRL and all other rail extensions (noting these use electric rather than fossil fuel sources)
- Tetratrap installation
- Walking and Cycling facilities at PT stations
- build required local road and state highway infrastructure for RUB extension areas (refer outputs from TIGA
workstreams)
- build PT infrastructure to support RUB extension areas (refer TIGA and RTN Review outputs)
- build infrastructure to support special housing areas
- build infrastructure to support identified brownfield growth areas, in particular the CBD (incl Wynyard Quarter),
metropolitan centres and town centres
- implement AT's plan change obligations
- complete the following missing links in the state highway network (SH1-SH18, SH20B upgrade, SH20 Waterview
Connection)
- complete any identified missing links in the PT and local road networks (e.g. electrification to Pukekohe)
- optimally maintain and renew existing infrastructure
- invest in intelligent transport systems to make best use of the network and provide better information to users
- invest in road and regional arterial improvements where they provide network benefits
- Deliver the following freight focussed initiatives:
- East West Link stg 1
- SH16 Grafton Gully / port access improvements
- freight focussed regional arterial improvements (e.g. East Tamaki)
- SH20 improvements
- SH1 - SEART improvements
- Third rail for freight
- Congestion targeting activities:
- regional arterial improvements (e.g. Lake Rd, Ellerslie Panmure Hwy, Lincoln Rd and Te Atatu Rd)
- Whau Crossing and PENLINK
- Additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing
- Various intersections and widenings on SH network
2012 Regional Public Transport Plan (AT - published)
2014 Rapid Transit Network Review (AT - currently WIP)
2013 Rail Development Strategy (AT - currently WIP)
2014 Parking Discussion Document (AT - Board approved)
Walking and Cycling Business Plans (AT)
2012 City Centre Future Access Study (SKM for AT/AC - published)
- complete rollout of new bus network, including construction of new bus-bus and bus-rail interchange facilities
(refer 2013 RPTP)
- complete RTN (refer 2014 draft RTN review)
- construct Park and Rides (refer draft Parking Strategy)
- build CRL and city centre bus improvements (refer City Centre Future Access Study)
- improve PT journey time reliability through bus lanes and RTN rollout
- increased investment in Walking and Cycling programmes
2013 Arterial Network Deficiency Analysis (AT - currently in draft)
AT Freight Strategy (AT - currently WIP)
NZTA Highway Future Directions (NZTA)