co2 separation with molecular gate membrane · 2 separation with molecular gate membrane research...
TRANSCRIPT
CO2 Separation withMolecular Gate Membrane
Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the EarthChemical Research Group
Shingo KAZAMA
April 27, 2004GCEP Energy WorkshopsAt Stanford University
Established in July 1990, as a core research organization with support of METI as well as regional governments and private companies
Objectives; - The Development of Innovative Environment-Related Technologies- The Expansion of CO2 Sinks
Research Institute of Innovative Technologyfor the Earth (RITE) :
- Systems Analysis Research Group (Comprehensive and systematic evaluation of global warming mitigation technologies and proposal of optimal scenarios for the above technologies.)
- Plant Physiology Research Group (Improving the photosynthetic functions of plants targeted for use in dry area)
- Microbiology Research Group (Research related to the utilization of microorganisms to convert biomass into useful substances and to reduce or eliminate environmental pollutants)
- Chemical Research Group (Research for CO2separation /fixation technologies)
- CO2 Sequestration Research Group (Research for geologic and ocean CO2 sequestration)
Research Groups and Research Fields :
URL: http://www.rite.or.jp/ for more information
‚b‚n‚Q
‚b‚n‚QCO2
CO2CO2
TransportSeparation/Capture Injection
Injection
Onshore aquifer
Offshore
�aquifer
Large scale�Emission source
CO2 Aquifer Sequestration :
CO2 CaptureTotal 54 - 60$/t-CO2
40 - 48$/t-CO2
RITE Cost Estimates (In Japan)
IEA Cost Estimates (presented at CSLF)
CO2 CaptureTotal 17 - 45$/t-CO2
15 - 40$/t-CO2
Geological CO2 Sequestration Cost Estimates:
Cost reduction in CO2 capture is a key issue of success incarbon sequestration !
- 90%
70% -80%
CO2 Separation & Capture Technologies:
Absorption
Absorber StrippingColumn
AmineSolution
Reboiler
SteamFlueGas
TreatedGas
Adsorption Membrane
VacuumPumpFlue
Gas
TreatedGas
Adsorbent
FlueGas
TreatedGas
VacuumPump
Chemical AbsorptionAmine Solution,Alkali Carbonate
SolutionPhysical AbsorptionAbsorption-Membrane
Hybrid
Physical AdsorptionPSA, TSA
Chemical Adsorption
Polymeric MembraneInorganic Membrane
(Ceramic, Carbon,Zeolite)
Molecular Gate Type
CO2
CO2
CO2
CO2
Membrane
:R&D in RITE
FeedSide
PermeatedSide
Pressure
High
Low
Solubility
Diffusivity
Permeability
X
Model of Gas Separation by Polymeric Membrane:
PCO2 >> PN2
Membrane
CO2
N2
Polyimide Containing Loop Shaped Moiety
Fluorene Moiety (RITE Cardo Polyimide)
1. Good Gas Permeability
2. Good Solubility
3.Good Thermal Stability
Excellent CO2/N2 SeparationProperty Asymmetric Membrane Preparation High Temperature Usage
Cardo Polyimide:
NC
C
CN
CO O
OO
* *
n
NC
CO
C
O
O
CN
CO
O
n
NC
C
CN
C**
O
O
O
O
n
n
NC
C CC
NC
O
O
O
O
* *CF3
CF3N
C
CO
C
O
O
CN
CO
O
n
* *
CH3 CH3
CH3H3C
* NC
CO
C
O
O
CN
CO
O
n
(H2C)6
NC
CO
C
O
O
CN
CO
O
nCOOCH3
NC
C
CN
CO O
OO
60
NC
C
CN
CO
O
O
O
40
CH2X CH2X
CH2XXH2C
CH2X CH2X
CH2XXH2C
PMDA-typeBTDA-type BPDA-type
6FDA-type 4Me-type Cardo-less
Br-type(PMBP64(4Me)-Br) Ester-type(BT-COOMe)
Chemical Structures of Cardo Polyimides:
80% of X is Br
PCO2 / Barrers
PC
O2
/ PN
2/ -
10
20
30
40
50
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Ester-type(BT-COOMe)
Br-type(PMBP64(4Me)-Br)
PMDA-type
BTDA-type
BPDA-type
6FDA-type
4Me-type
Cardo-less
Cardo PolymersExcept for Polyimide
�
Press Difference�101 kPa, Measured at 25 C1 Barrer = 7.5 x 10-18 m3 m m-2 s-1 Pa-1
CO2 Separation Property:
Conventional Polymers
Inner Coagulant: Water
Polymer Dope
Air Gap
Inner CoagulantPolymer Dope
CoagulationBath (1st)
CoagulationBath (2nd)
RinsingDry & Anneal
Tube-in-orifice Spinneret
Schematic Representation of Spinning Set:
CO2 Separation Property of Hollow Fiber Membrane Made from Br-type Cardo Polyimide(PMBP64(4Me)-Br)
SEM ImageCross Section
100 micro meter
CO2 Permeation 1 x 10-3 cm3(STP) cm-2 s-1 cmHg-1
Rate: (=7.5 x 10-9 m3 m-2 s-1 Pa-1)CO2/N2 Selectivity: 40
Measured at 25 C
Cardo Polyimide Asymmetric Hollow fiber:
Module of Cardo Polyimide Hollow Fiber:
Capacity : 1.6 Nm3/h (Flue Gas)Membrane Area: 8 m2
Hollow Fibers: 25,600 pieces
For Steel Works: CO2=26.5%
For Coal-Fired Power Plant:CO2=14.1%
CO2 Amount Captured: 180t-CO2/hCO2 Concentration: 99.5%
CO2Separation Cost/JPY/t-CO2
RITE Membrane (Cardo)
Amine Solution (KS)
Cost Comparison:
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
Liquefied Separation
17 33 6750$/t-CO2
Liquefied Separation
Liquefied Separation
Liquefied Separation
RITE Membrane (Cardo)
Amine Solution (KS)
Further Cost Reduction in CO2 Capture:
-CO2 recovery from atmospheric pressure gasstream might have a cap on cost reduction.
-Pressurized gas stream might have potentialfor further cost reduction.
- Pressurized gas stream- IGCC Process gas (e.g. FutureGen)- Natural gas
Approaches to Cost Reduction:
0 25 50 75 100Cost Breakdown(percentage)/%
Vacuum Pump Elect.& Blower Power
PlantConstruction
Max. 75% Cut in Cost
Membrane Etc.AtmosphericPressureGas Stream
PressurizedGas Stream(IGCC ProcessGas)
Cost Breakdown of Membrane Separation
CO2/H2Selectivity H2 Rich Flow CO2 Rich Flow
H2: 94%CO2: 6%
H2: 4%CO2: 96%
0.3Polymeric Membrane
H2: 80%CO2: 20%
H2: 55%CO2: 45%
0.1Ceramic Membrane
H2: 90%CO2: 10%
H2: 38%CO2: 72%
Selectivity Required for IGCC Process Gas:
In the case of feed gas composition, CO2:40% and H2:60%
After Membrane Separation
100New Concept
Membrane
Gas Permeation Blockade by Moisture:
Micro PorousMembrane
H2O Gas BGas B
Gas B LargePermeation
Very Small Permeation
Without Moisture With Moisture
H2O Large Permeation
PAMAM Dendrimer (Generation 0):
H2N
NH
N N
HN O
H2N
ONH
O
H2N
HN
O
NH2
- CO2/N2 Selectivity: 19000A. S. Kovvali, H. Chen, and K. K. SirkarJ. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7594-7595
In Situ Module Modification:
SupportingMembrane
Solution ofMembraneMaterials
CommercialUF, RO Module
Solution
ReducedPressure
Pump
ReducedPressure
Conc.Gradient
MembraneMaterial
Selectivity CO2/N2=1 Selectivity CO2/N2=67
600nm
QCO2=1.0x10-3* QCO2=3.9x10-5*
PSFUF Membrane
PAMAM DendrimerComposite Membr.
020000400006000080000
100000
020040060080010001200Binding Energy (eV)
cps
C1s
S2pS2s
O1s
01000020000300004000050000600007000080000
020040060080010001200Binding Energy (eV)
cps N1s
In Situ Module
Modification
*�cm3/(cm2 s cmHg) = 7.5x10-6 m3/(m2 s Pa)
Result of In Situ Module Modification:
On-Going R & D:
-Research and Development of Materials fora CO2 Molecular Gate Function
- Chemical Modification of Dendrimer- Other Different Material
-Improvement of In-Situ Module Modification- Pin-Hole Free Thin Layer- Garter Layer
Japan
USA
RITE
National Energy Technology Laboratory-DOECarbon Sequestration Science Focus Area-Modular CO2 Capture Facility -Field Test of Module
International Collaboration:
-Molecular Gate Materials & Membranes-Module Development -System Analysis
The University of Texas at Austin-Information Exchange in Membrane Fabrication
Cooperative Research
Meiji University (Commission)-Membrane Fabrication
-CO2 molecular gate membrane has a potentialfor reducing CO2 capture cost in combinationwith a pressurized gas stream.
-RITE contributes for developing modules of CO2 molecular gate membranes with International collaboration.
-This research project is funded by METI.
Conclusions & Acknowledgement:
Shingo [email protected]