coal concepts proficiency testing general analysis … · coal concepts proficiency testing general...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1 of 22
`
COAL CONCEPTS PROFICIENCY TESTING
GENERAL ANALYSIS SAMPLE
REPORT – ONE HUNDRED AND TWO
Revision 00
Final report
DATE ISSUED: 30 APRIL 2020
PARTICIPANT
SCHEME COORDINATOR: K MUNSAMY
SIGNATURE
CHECKED BY: R BABOOLAL (SCHEME MANAGER)
Disclaimer: Opinions and interpretations expressed herein are outside the scope of SANAS accreditation *Moisture in the analysis sample is not included in the SANAS schedule of accreditation as robust statistics cannot be applied.
Chlorine, Fluorine, Quick ash, ASTM ash and ASTM Volatiles is not included in the scope of accreditation.
THINKING QUALITY, QUALITY THINKING
REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2006/149731/23 (RMB INDUSTRIAL STATIONERS cc t/a)
81 CERAMIC CURVE, ALTON, RICHARDS BAY 3900 l TEL: +27(0)35 751 2446 l CEL: +27(0)83 6500151 l FAX: 0862605793
E-MAIL: [email protected] l [email protected]
LABORATORY CODE:
Page 2 of 22
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. One hundred and ten samples were sent to participants with 87 timeous result submissions
2. The total number of outliers found were as follows (dry base):
• ISO Ash x 4
• ISO volatile matter x 4
• Calorific value x 1
• Total sulphur x 2
• Phosphorous in coal x 3
• Total Carbon x1
• Nitrogen x 1
• Ash fusion (softening) x 1
• Ash fusion (hemisphere) x 1
3. Chlorine, Fluorine, ASTM Ash, ASTM Volatile Matter, Carbon, Hydrogen and Nitrogen participants were insufficient to
warrant robust statistical calculations. 4. Trending for your laboratory is as follows:
Page 3 of 22
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM
PAGE NUMBER
Letter to participant
4
List of participants
5
Type of sample used
6
Preparation of sample
6
Homogeneity check
6
Stability check
7
ISO Ash data
8
ISO Ash z-score trend
9
Quick Ash data 10
Quick Ash trend 11
ISO Volatile matter data
12
ISO Volatile matter z-score trend
13
Calorific value data
14
Calorific value z-score trend
15
Total sulphur data
16
Total sulphur z-score trend
17
Phosphorous data and Z-Score trend
18
Carbon data / Hydrogen data / Nitrogen data
19
AFT data and z-scores
20
ASTM Ash and ASTM Volatile matter, Chlorine & Fluorine 20
Conclusion
21
Terms & Conditions 22
Page 4 of 22
Dear Participant
RE: PROFICIENCY TESTING RESULTS FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 2020 Thank you for your participation in the Coal Concepts proficiency testing scheme.
Your laboratory code is as per the cover page.
All results are totally confidential. Any results in Bold, Italics and Underlined are outliers. Where applicable, the most
extreme outliers have been eliminated from calculations using the Grubbs estimate for outliers. Robust statistics has
been applied where possible. Analysis results have been reported on air dry and dry base. The dry base results have
been used to calculate the z-scores.
Please take note of the following:
1. Z-scores between -1 and +1 is deemed acceptable
2. Z-scores between -2 and -3 should serve as a warning that the analysis result could get worse
3. Z-scores between +2 and +3 should also serve as a warning that analysis results could get worse.
4. Z- scores lower than -3 and exceeding +3 should warrant an investigation
5. Compare your result to the robust average which will be the assigned value. The measurement of uncertainty (UoM)
of the results is also stated.
6. All calculations can be made available upon request
The Coal Concepts scheme adheres to the requirements of ISO/IEC 17043:2010 – Conformity assessment – General
requirements for proficiency testing.
Statistical analysis has been carried out using ISO/IEC 13528:2015-Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by
interlaboratory comparisons
Please find results attached together with Z-score trends.
Best Regards
R Baboolal
Page 5 of 22
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER
Arcelor Mittal - Vanderbijl Park Arcelor Mittal - Newcastle
Anglo SOC - Goedehoop Colliery South Plant Anglo SOC - Goedehoop Colliery North Plant
Anglo SOC - Kleinkopje Colliery Anglo SOC - Greenside Colliery
Afrisam - Dudfield Alfred H Knight -Richards Bay Laboratory
Afrisam - Ulco AquaSpecto
Botswana Power Corporation - Morupule B Power Station Bureau Veritas Inspectorate Laboratories - Middelburg
Bureau Veritas – Moatize, Vale Bureau Veritas - Nacala
Bureau Veritas Inspectorate Laboratories - Tendele Bureau Veritas Inspectorate Laboratories - Beira
Bureau Veritas Inspectorate Laboratories - Alton Bureau Veritas Testing & Inspection SA - Pretoria
Bureau Veritas Inspectorate Laboratories - Belfast Cotecna South Africa - Nasonti
Cotecna South Africa - Lurco Cotecna South Africa - Phola
Cotecna South Africa – Tselentis Cotecna South Africa - Kangala
Cotecna South Africa - Middelburg Cotecna Ubumbene(Pty)Ltd - Umlabu
- Umlabu Cotecna South Africa - Mimosa Cotecna South Africa - VDD
Cotecna South Africa - Droogvallei Cotecna South Africa - AMR
Delmas Coal Eyethu Coal Mooifontein
Eyethu Coal Wilge Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Matimba Power Station
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd – Kendal Power station Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Duvha Power Station
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd – Lethabo Power Station Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Komati Power Station
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Tutuka Power Station Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Grootvlei Power Station
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - ERID Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Kriel Power Station
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Hendrina Power Station Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd – Majuba Power Station
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Arnot Power Station Exxaro Resources - Grootegeluk Mine
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Matla Power Station Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd – Medupi Power Station
Exxaro Resources - Matla Mine G&W Base & Industrial Minerals
Glencore Wonderkop Glencore -Rustenburg Smelter
Glencore Boshoek Smelter Glencore -Lydenburg Smelter
Glencore Lion Smelter Hwange Colliery – Zimbabwe
HighVeld Laboratories Idwala Lime
Intertek Mozambique Kangra Coal (Pty) Ltd
Jindal Mining SA Pty Ltd – Kiepersol Colliery Mpumamanzi Group CC
Khwezela Colliery - Landau Mafube Colliery Mine PTY (Ltd)
Lafarge Industries SA (Pty) Ltd - Lichtenburg Mitra SK South Africa (PTY) Ltd
Morupule Coal Mine - Botswana Noko Analytical Services CC - Welgemeend
Msobo Coal PTY Ltd Noko Analytical Services CC - Twistdraai
M L Coal PTY Ltd Quality Ensure Eastside Laboratory
Noko Analytical Services CC - Hakahno Ronewa Lab Middelburg
Noko Analytical Services CC - Witbank Ronewa Lab Ubuntu
Richards Bay Minerals Seriti - New Vaal Colliery
RSA Labs Siza Coal Services - Vlakfontein
Seriti - Kriel Colliery Siza Coal Services - Kinross
Siza Coal Services - Wescoal Siza Coal Services - NCC
Siza Coal Services - Botswana Siza Coal Services - Mooiplaats
Siza Coal Services - Middelburg Siza Coal Services - Sasolburg
Siza Coal Services - Carolina Siza Coal Services - NBC
Siza Coal Services - Wildfontein South 32 – Khutala Colliery
Siza Coal Services - Umlalazi Sibonisiwe Coal Laboratory Services CC - West Coal Processing
Sibonisiwe Coal Laboratory Services CC - Vaalbult Sibonisiwe Coal Laboratory Services CC – Mzimkhulu
Sibonisiwe Coal Laboratory Services CC SABS Commercial SOC Ltd Richards bay
Sibonisiwe Coal Laboratory Services CC – Elandsfontein SABS Commercial SOC Ltd Secunda
SABS Commercial SOC Ltd CSIR SABS Commercial SOC Ltd Springlake
SABS Commercial SOC Ltd Uitkomst UIS Analytical Services
SPTE Lab - Middelburg Umzamo Analytical Services - Witbank
Tata Steel – Wales Lab, Europe Umzamo Analytical Services - Sudor
Umzamo Analytical Services - Overlooked Colliery Zululand Anthracite Colliery
Umzamo Analytical Services - Doornrug
Vitrovian Analytical Services DELMAS
Page 6 of 22
1. TYPE OF SAMPLE USED
The coal used in this proficiency testing round was bituminous coal
2. PREPARATION OF SAMPLE
Approximately 1000kg’s of sample with an approximate topsize of 50mm was sourced. This was crushed to -
4mm using a jaw crusher. The -4mm material was reduced to -212um using a cross beat pulveriser. The 212
material was sieved using a 212um screen. Any +212um material was pulverised and sieved until all material
passed through the 212 um sieve.
All the -212um material was then mixed in a mixing drum for 4 hours.
3. HOMOGENEITY CHECK
There were 110 participants in this round, 10 portions of sample were randomly extracted. These were
packaged in their final form i.e. in 200ml sample bottles. The bottles were labelled 1 to 10. The results were as
follows:
SAMPLE NO.
TEST PORTION 1
TEST PORTION 2
sample av (Xt) range (Wt) range sqd
1 26,90 26,91 26,91 0,01 0,0001
2 26,88 26,79 26,84 0,09 0,0081
3 26,82 26,74 26,78 0,08 0,0064
4 26,74 27,03 26,89 0,29 0,0841
5 26,78 26,88 26,83 0,10 0,0100
6 26,76 26,98 26,87 0,22 0,0484
7 26,83 26,84 26,84 0,01 0,0001
8 26,84 26,76 26,80 0,08 0,0064
9 26,90 26,81 26,86 0,09 0,0081
10 26,95 26,92 26,94 0,03 0,0009
GENERAL AVERAGE 26,85 STANDARD DEVIATION 0,047 WITHIN SAMPLE STANDARD DEVIATION 0,093
BETWEEN SAMPLE STANDARD DEVIATION 0,046
The between sample standard deviation must be ≤ 0.3 x ơ
(ơ = std deviation for the proficiency assessment)
Ơ = 2% of the mean was used, which is the repeatability for ISO ash (Ash % > 10%)
Hence 0.3 x 0.537 = 0.161
Since 0.046 < 0.161, the samples are homogenous
Page 7 of 22
4. STABILITY CHECK Samples were retained for sales as reference material. Ten of them were randomly chosen for stability testing.
In order for the proficiency testing samples to be declared stable the general average from the homogeneity
check and that of the stability check the difference in the general average should not differ by more than 0.3 X
precision.
This test has been carried out about a month after the samples were received by the participating laboratories
SAMPLE NO.
TEST PORTION 1
TEST PORTION 2
sample av (Xt) range (Wt) range sqd
1 26,74 26,90 26,82 0,16 0,0256
2 26,99 26,84 26,92 0,15 0,0225
3 26,63 26,96 26,80 0,33 0,1089
4 26,82 26,76 26,79 0,06 0,0036
5 26,88 26,84 26,86 0,04 0,0016
6 26,98 26,89 26,94 0,09 0,0081
7 26,98 26,77 26,88 0,21 0,0441
8 26,92 26,45 26,69 0,47 0,2209
9 26,84 26,93 26,89 0,09 0,0081
10 26,94 26,88 26,91 0,06 0,0036
GENERAL AVERAGE 26,85 STANDARD DEVIATION 0,076 WITHIN SAMPLE STANDARD DEVIATION 0,149
BETWEEN SAMPLE STANDARD DEVIATION 0,074
(Ơ = 0.566 was used)
For this report 0.3 x 0.537 = 0.161
Absolute value of (26.85– 26.85) = 0.0
Since 0.0 < 0.161 the proficiency testing samples were stable
Page 8 of 22
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : ISO ASH (%)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY (%) DRY BASE (%) Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 3,95 27,01 28,12 0,93
6a 3,24 27,04 27,95 -0,15
7a 3,41 27,25 28,21 1,50
9a 3,99 26,75 27,86 -0,66
10a 3,70 26,90 27,93 -0,22
12a 4,20 26,90 28,08 0,68
13a 3,80 26,70 27,75 -1,32
18a 3,63 27,06 28,08 0,68
21a 4,45 26,80 28,05 0,48
23a 3,38 26,93 27,87 -0,60
28a 4,09 26,90 28,05 0,48
30a 4,11 26,69 27,83 -0,84
33a 4,00 26,80 27,92 -0,33
35a 3,76 26,90 27,95 -0,11
36a 3,80 26,90 27,96 -0,04
37a 4,28 26,83 28,03 0,37
38a 4,29 26,42 27,60 -2,25
42a 4,09 27,12 28,28 1,89
49a 3,70 27,16 28,20 1,44
58a 3,51 27,01 27,99 0,14
59a 3,28 27,04 27,96 -0,08
60a 4,16 26,76 27,92 -0,30
66a 3,37 20,04 20,74 -44,57
71a 4,10 26,90 28,05 0,50
74a 3,63 27,00 28,02 0,29
76a 4,00 26,93 28,05 0,51
78a 1,71 26,15 26,60 -8,41
79a 3,91 26,96 28,06 0,54
80a 3,80 26,70 27,75 -1,32
82a 3,80 26,95 28,01 0,3
83a 3,80 27,00 28,07 0,60
91a 4,00 26,50 27,60 -2,25
92a 3,60 26,53 27,52 -2,77
95a 3,39 27,10 28,05 0,50
96a 3,98 27,09 28,21 1,5
97a 4,09 26,84 27,98 0,09
99a 3,70 27,00 28,04 0,42
100a 4,17 26,59 27,75 -1,37
101a 4,12 26,87 28,02 0,3
106a 3,95 26,83 27,93 -0,22
110a 4,02 27,00 28,13 0,99
112a 3,70 26,90 27,93 -0,22
117a 3,65 27,10 28,13 0,97
124a 3,78 26,78 27,83 -0,85
135a 3,65 27,12 28,15 1,10
145a 4,23 26,90 28,09 0,73
151a 3,77 27,08 28,14 1,06
161a 4,10 26,80 27,95 -0,15
162a 4,40 26,75 27,98 0,07
167a 3,60 27,00 28,01 0,24
169a 3,92 27,01 28,11 0,88
170a 4,10 26,80 27,95 -0,15
171a 1,80 26,04 26,52 -8,95
173a 3,96 27,60 28,74 4,74
177a 3,01 26,80 27,63 -2,08
179a 4,00 27,00 28,13 0,96
180a 3,60 26,87 27,87 -0,59
184a 3,40 27,15 28,11 0,84
190a 4,30 26,60 27,80 -1,07
191a 4,50 26,70 27,96 -0,07
192a 4,20 26,50 27,66 -1,90
195a 4,04 26,74 27,87 -0,64
198a 3,50 27,17 28,16 1,15
201a 4,10 26,73 27,87 -0,60
Number of results - 64 64 64 -
OUTLIERS - - 4 4 -
AVERAGE - 3,78 26,89 27,97 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0,18 0,16 -
MEDIAN 26,90 27,99
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 26,89 27,97 -
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0,20 0,17 -
UoM 0,03 0,03
Page 9 of 22
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
Z-SC
OR
E
LABORATORY ID
ISO ASH Z-SCORE TREND
Page 10 of 22
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : QUICK ASH (%)
LAB ID
MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY (%) DRY BASE (%)
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
21a 4,45 26,98 28,24 1,37
22a 3,50 25,98 26,92 -3,75
23a 3,38 27,01 27,95 0,27
35a 3,76 26,90 27,95 0,25
36a 3,80 26,90 27,96 0,30
37a 4,28 26,80 28,00 0,44
39a 4,10 26,33 27,46 -1,68 41a 4,00 26,60 27,71 -0,69 49a 3,70 27,01 28,05 0,63 50a 3,59 27,21 28,22 1,31 59a 3,28 26,90 27,81 -0,29 74a 3,63 26,93 27,94 0,23 77a 4,20 26,70 27,87 -0,06 92a 3,60 26,45 27,44 -1,75 94a 3,97 26,68 27,78 -0,40 101a 4,12 26,95 28,11 0,87 102a 4,00 26,60 27,71 -0,69 130a 3,60 26,90 27,90 0,07 133a 4,33 26,33 27,52 -1,42 140a 4,38 26,90 28,13 0,96 145a 4,23 26,50 27,67 -0,84 153a 3,88 26,70 27,78 -0,42 160a 3,88 26,70 27,78 -0,42 161a 4,10 26,60 27,74 -0,58 162a 4,40 26,75 27,98 0,37 163a 4,50 27,20 28,48 2,32 169a 3,92 26,95 28,05 0,64 176a 4,40 27,20 28,45 2,21 178a 3,05 26,93 27,78 -0,42 179a 4,00 26,80 27,92 0,12 181a 4,10 26,50 27,63 -0,98 182a 3,90 26,90 27,99 0,41 184a 3,40 26,90 27,85 -0,15 185a 4,40 26,73 27,96 0,29 187a 3,68 26,78 27,80 -0,32 188a 4,03 26,93 28,06 0,68 189a 4,69 26,83 28,15 1,03 190a 4,30 26,30 27,48 -1,57 191a 4,50 26,50 27,75 -0,53 192a 4,20 26,10 27,24 -2,50 198a 3,50 26,98 27,96 0,28 199a 3,76 27,00 28,05 0,66 Number of results - 42 42 42 - OUTLIERS - - 0 1 -
AVERAGE - 3,97 26,76 27,89 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0,28 0,26 -
MEDIAN 26,82 27,92
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 26,77 27,89 -
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0,30 0,27 -
UoM 0,06 0,05
Page 11 of 22
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
Z-SC
OR
E
LABORATORY ID
QUICK ASH Z-SCORE TREND
Page 12 of 22 COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : ISO VOLATILE MATTER (%)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 3,95 19,51 20,31 0,04
6a 3,24 19,38 20,03 -0,76
7a 3,41 17,31 17,92 -6,73
9a 3,99 19,75 20,57 0,77
10a 3,70 19,70 20,46 0,45
12a 4,20 18,90 19,73 -1,61
13a 3,80 19,20 19,96 -0,96
18a 3,63 19,17 19,89 -1,15
21a 4,45 19,45 20,36 0,16
22a 3,50 19,67 20,38 0,24
23a 3,38 19,54 20,22 -0,21
28a 4,09 19,80 20,64 0,98
30a 4,11 19,20 20,02 -0,78
33a 4,00 19,05 19,84 -1,29
35a 3,76 19,80 20,57 0,78
36a 3,80 19,20 19,96 -0,96
37a 4,28 19,60 20,48 0,50
38a 4,29 20,09 20,99 1,95
39a 4,10 19,40 20,23 -0,20
41a 4,00 19,90 20,73 1,22
42a 4,09 19,71 20,55 0,71
49a 3,70 19,47 20,22 -0,23
50a 3,59 19,74 20,48 0,50
58a 3,51 19,85 20,57 0,77
59a 3,28 19,74 20,41 0,31
60a 4,16 18,97 19,79 -1,43
66a 3,37 27,07 28,01 21,80
71a 4,10 19,90 20,75 1,28
74a 3,63 19,48 20,21 -0,24
76a 4,00 18,70 19,48 -2,32
77a 4,20 19,50 20,35 0,16
78a 1,71 22,57 22,96 7,53
79a 3,91 19,63 20,43 0,37
80a 3,80 19,30 20,06 -0,67
82a 3,80 19,41 20,18 -0,35
83a 3,80 20,30 21,10 2,27
91a 4,00 20,20 21,04 2,10
92a 3,60 19,44 20,17 -0,38
94a 3,97 21,47 22,35 5,81
95a 3,39 19,38 20,06 -0,67
96a 3,98 19,39 20,19 -0,30
97a 4,09 19,66 20,50 0,56
99a 3,70 19,50 20,25 -0,14
100a 4,17 19,95 20,82 1,47
101a 4,12 19,70 20,55 0,70
102a 4,00 20,10 20,94 1,80
106a 3,95 19,67 20,48 0,51
110a 4,02 19,46 20,28 -0,07
112a 3,70 19,60 20,35 0,15
117a 3,65 19,33 20,06 -0,67
124a 3,78 18,94 19,68 -1,74
130a 3,60 19,50 20,23 -0,2
133a 4,33 19,18 20,04 -0,72
135a 3,65 19,12 19,84 -1,28
140a 4,38 19,53 20,42 0,36
145a 4,23 19,60 20,47 0,47
151a 3,77 19,60 20,37 0,20
161a 4,10 19,90 20,75 1,28
162a 4,40 19,64 20,54 0,69
167a 3,60 19,60 20,33 0,09
169a 3,92 18,70 19,46 -2,36
170a 4,10 19,50 20,33 0,10
173a 3,96 20,19 21,02 2,05
179a 4,00 19,00 19,79 -1,43
180a 3,60 19,90 20,64 0,97
181a 4,10 19,50 20,33 0,10
182a 3,90 19,80 20,60 0,86
184a 3,40 19,60 20,29 -0,03
187a 3,68 19,48 20,22 -0,23
188a 4,03 19,13 19,93 -1,03
189a 4,69 18,93 19,86 -1,24
190a 4,30 19,10 19,96 -0,96
191a 4,50 19,00 19,90 -1,14
192a 4,20 19,10 19,94 -1,02
195a 4,04 19,60 20,43 0,36
198a 3,50 19,60 20,31 0,03
199a 3,76 19,76 20,53 0,66
201a 4,10 19,40 20,23 -0,20
NUMBER OF RESULTS - 78 78 78 -
OUTLIERS - - 4 4 -
AVERAGE - 3,88 19,50 20,30 -
STD DEVIATION - 0,34 0,35 -
MEDIAN 19,51 20,32
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 19,50 20,30 -
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0,38 0,39 -
UoM - - 0,05 0,06
Page 13 of 22
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
7a 169a
76a
124a
12a
179a
60a
33a
135a
189a
18a
191a
188a
192a
190a
13a
36a
30a
6a 133a
95a
117a
80a
92a
82a
96a
74a
49a
187a
23a
130a
39a
201a
99a
110a
184a
198a
1a 167a
170a
181a
112a
77a
21a
151a
22a
59a
140a
195a
79a
10a
145a
50a
37a
106a
97a
199a
162a
101a
42a
9a 58a
35a
182a
180a
28a
41a
71a
161a
100a
102a
38a
173a
91a
83a
94a
78a
66aZ-
SCO
RE
LABORATORY ID
VOLATILE MATTER Z-SCORE TREND
Page 14 of 22 COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : CALORIFIC VALUE (MJ/kg)
LAB ID
MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY (MJ/kg) DRY BASE (MJ/kg)
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 3,95 21,57 22,46 -0,85
6a 3,24 21,76 22,49 -0,75
9a 3,99 21,58 22,48 -0,79
10a 3,70 21,78 22,62 -0,32
12a 4,20 21,71 22,66 -0,17
18a 3,63 21,74 22,56 -0,51
21a 4,45 21,60 22,61 -0,36
23a 3,38 21,85 22,61 -0,33
28a 4,09 22,46 23,42 2,33
30a 4,11 21,83 22,77 0,17
33a 4,00 21,88 22,79 0,26
35a 3,76 21,78 22,63 -0,27
36a 3,80 21,92 22,79 0,24
37a 4,28 21,57 22,53 -0,59
38a 4,29 22,62 23,63 3,05
39a 4,10 21,55 22,47 -0,80
42a 4,09 22,48 23,44 2,40
49a 3,70 21,79 22,63 -0,29
50a 3,59 21,74 22,55 -0,54
58a 3,51 21,73 22,52 -0,64
60a 4,16 21,69 22,63 -0,27
66a 3,37 21,90 22,66 -0,17
71a 4,10 21,63 22,55 -0,53
74a 3,63 21,72 22,54 -0,58
76a 4,00 22,06 22,98 0,88
77a 4,20 21,93 22,89 0,59
79a 3,91 21,95 22,84 0,43
80a 3,80 21,68 22,54 -0,59
82a 3,80 21,84 22,70 -0,05
83a 3,80 21,93 22,80 0,27
91a 4,00 21,62 22,52 -0,64
92a 3,60 21,33 22,13 -1,95
94a 3,97 21,47 22,35 -1,19
95a 3,39 22,16 22,94 0,74
96a 3,98 21,94 22,85 0,45
99a 3,70 21,67 22,50 -0,70
100a 4,17 21,65 22,59 -0,40
101a 4,12 21,51 22,43 -0,93
102a 4,00 22,36 23,29 1,91
106a 3,95 21,68 22,57 -0,47
110a 4,02 21,71 22,62 -0,31
112a 3,70 21,65 22,48 -0,77
117a 3,65 21,83 22,66 -0,19
124a 3,78 21,76 22,61 -0,33
130a 3,60 21,66 22,47 -0,81
133a 4,33 21,49 22,46 -0,84
135a 3,65 21,78 22,61 -0,36
140a 4,38 21,62 22,61 -0,34
145a 4,23 21,85 22,82 0,34
151a 3,77 21,66 22,51 -0,68
153a 3,88 21,61 22,48 -0,77
160a 3,88 22,01 22,90 0,61
161a 4,10 21,72 22,65 -0,22
162a 4,40 22,88 23,93 4,04
163a 4,50 21,92 22,95 0,79
167a 3,60 21,98 22,80 0,29
169a 3,92 21,70 22,59 -0,43
170a 4,10 21,64 22,57 -0,49
171a 1,80 22,31 22,72 0,02
172a 4,27 21,20 22,15 -1,88
176a 4,40 21,98 22,99 0,92
177a 3,01 22,28 22,97 0,85
179a 4,00 21,70 22,60 -0,36
180a 3,60 21,29 22,09 -2,08
181a 4,10 22,48 23,44 2,41
182a 3,90 22,40 23,31 1,97
184a 3,40 21,99 22,76 0,17
187a 3,68 22,59 23,45 2,45
188a 4,03 22,39 23,33 2,04
189a 4,69 21,55 22,61 -0,34
190a 4,30 21,72 22,70 -0,06
191a 4,50 21,58 22,60 -0,39
192a 4,20 21,87 22,83 0,38
195a 4,04 21,75 22,67 -0,16
198a 3,50 22,13 22,93 0,72
199a 3,76 21,76 22,61 -0,34
201a 4,10 21,83 22,76 0,16
NUMBER OF RESULTS - 77 77 77 -
OUTLIERS - - 0 1 -
AVERAGE - 3,90 21,84 22,71 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0,32 0,30 -
MEDIAN 21,76 22,62
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 21,84 22,71 -
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0,34 0,32 -
UoM - - 0,05 0,05 -
Page 15 of 22
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
180a
92a
172a
94a
101a
1a 133a
130a
39a
9a 112a
153a
6a 99a
151a
58a
91a
37a
80a
74a
50a
71a
18a
170a
106a
169a
100a
191a
179a
135a
21a
199a
140a
189a
23a
124a
10a
110a
49a
35a
60a
161a
117a
12a
66a
195a
190a
82a
171a
201a
184a
30a
36a
33a
83a
167a
145a
192a
79a
96a
77a
160a
198a
95a
163a
177a
76a
176a
102a
182a
188a
28a
42a
181a
187a
38a
162aZ-SC
OR
E
LABORATORY ID
CALORIFIC VALUE Z-SCORE TREND
Page 16 of 22
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : TOTAL SULPHUR (%)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 3,95 1,25 1,30 0,20
6a 3,24 1,32 1,36 1,05
7a 3,41 0,33 0,34 -12,93
9a 3,99 1,20 1,25 -0,51
10a 3,70 1,16 1,20 -1,13
12a 4,20 1,24 1,29 0,0
13a 3,80 1,05 1,09 -2,68
18a 3,63 1,23 1,28 -0,15
21a 4,45 1,24 1,30 0,15
23a 3,38 1,21 1,25 -0,48
28a 4,09 1,22 1,27 -0,21
30a 4,11 1,23 1,28 -0,06
36a 3,80 1,19 1,24 -0,69
37a 4,28 1,27 1,33 0,54
38a 4,29 1,41 1,47 2,55
39a 4,10 1,20 1,25 -0,49
42a 4,09 1,37 1,43 1,93
49a 3,70 1,28 1,33 0,58
50a 3,59 1,32 1,37 1,12
60a 4,16 1,27 1,33 0,52
66a 3,37 1,32 1,37 1,08
71a 4,10 1,15 1,20 -1,20
74a 3,63 1,19 1,23 -0,72
76a 4,00 1,29 1,34 0,77
78a 1,71 0,96 0,98 -4,25
79a 3,91 1,25 1,30 0,19
80a 3,80 1,21 1,26 -0,40
83a 3,80 1,24 1,29 0,0
91a 4,00 1,31 1,36 1,06
95a 3,39 1,30 1,35 0,80
97a 4,09 1,20 1,25 -0,49
99a 3,70 1,24 1,29 0,0
101a 4,12 1,28 1,34 0,65
106a 3,95 1,29 1,34 0,76
110a 4,02 1,24 1,29 0,07
112a 3,70 1,18 1,23 -0,85
130a 3,60 1,20 1,24 -0,58
133a 4,33 1,22 1,28 -0,16
135a 3,65 1,28 1,33 0,57
140a 4,38 1,24 1,30 0,13
145a 4,23 1,19 1,24 -0,61
151a 3,77 1,25 1,30 0,16
161a 4,10 1,16 1,21 -1,06
162a 4,40 1,22 1,28 -0,15
167a 3,60 1,44 1,49 2,83
169a 3,92 1,24 1,29 0,0
172a 4,27 1,23 1,28 -0,03
173a 3,96 1,21 1,26 -0,37
177a 3,01 1,19 1,23 -0,82
179a 4,00 1,13 1,18 -1,51
180a 3,60 1,09 1,13 -2,14
181a 4,10 1,26 1,31 0,37
184a 3,40 1,17 1,21 -1,04
188a 4,03 1,14 1,19 -1,36
189a 4,69 1,35 1,42 1,77
190a 4,30 1,19 1,24 -0,60
191a 4,50 1,19 1,25 -0,56
192a 4,20 1,19 1,24 -0,62
198a 3,50 1,34 1,39 1,39
199a 3,76 1,25 1,30 0,16
201a 4,10 1,24 1,29 0,00
NUMBER OF RESULTS 61 61 61 -
OUTLIERS - - 2 2 -
AVERAGE - 3,88 1,24 1,29
MEDIAN - 1,24 1,29
STD DEVIATION - - 0,07 0,07
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 1,24 1,29 -
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0,07 0,08 -
UoM - - 0,01 0,01
Page 17 of 22
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
7a 78a
13a
180a
179a
188a
71a
10a
161a
184a
112a
177a
74a
36a
192a
145a
190a
130a
191a
9a 97a
39a
23a
80a
173a
28a
133a
162a
18a
30a
172a
12a
201a
99a
83a
169a
110a
140a
21a
199a
151a
79a
1a 181a
60a
37a
135a
49a
101a
106a
76a
95a
6a 91a
66a
50a
198a
189a
42a
38a
167aZ-
SCO
RE
LABORATORY ID
TOTAL SULPHUR Z-SCORE TREND
Page 18 of 22
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : PHOSPHOROUS IN COAL (%)
LAB ID
MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 3,95 0,048 0,050 0,25
7a 3,41 0,070 0,072 6,55
12a 4,20 0,047 0,049 0,0
13a 3,80 0,043 0,045 -1,23
18a 3,63 0,021 0,022 -7,65
21a 4,45 0,041 0,043 -1,73
23a 3,38 0,044 0,045 -1,02
38a 4,29 0,083 0,086 10,40
74a 3,63 0,045 0,047 -0,67
78a 1,71 0,049 0,050 0,22
99a 3,70 0,050 0,052 0,80
112a 3,70 0,052 0,054 1,38
114a 3,88 0,053 0,055 1,70
169a 3,92 0,049 0,051 0,54
172a 4,27 0,049 0,051 0,59
173a 3,96 0,044 0,046 -0,92
177a 3,01 0,048 0,049 0,00
Number of results - 17 17 17 -
OUTLIERS - - 3 3 - AVERAGE - 3,70 0,047 0,049 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0,003 0,004 -
MEDIAN - 0,048 0,050
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 0,047 0,049 ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0,004 0,004
UoM - - 0,001 0,001
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
18a 21a 13a 23a 173a 74a 12a 177a 78a 1a 169a 172a 99a 112a 114a 7a 38a
Z-SC
OR
ES
LAB ID
PHOSPHOROUS IN COAL Z-SCORES
Page 19 of 22
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : TOTAL CARBON (%)
LAB ID
MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 3,95 56,18 58,49 0,00
9a** 3,99 57,18 59,56 1,17
12a 4,20 55,70 58,14 -0,38
18a 3,63 56,02 58,13 -0,40
21a** 4,45 56,86 59,51 1,12
66a** 3,37 57,80 59,82 1,45
99a 3,70 55,50 57,63 -0,94
145a 4,23 55,27 57,71 -0,85
173a 3,96 61,23 63,75 5,77
177a** 3,01 55,70 57,43 -1,16
Number of results - 10 10 10 -
OUTLIERS - - 1 1 -
AVERAGE - 3,85 56,25 58,49 -
MEDIAN - - 56,02 58,14 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0,85 0,91 -
REPRODUCIBILITY
UPPER LIMIT - - - 59,49 -
LOWER LIMIT - - - 57,49 -
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : HYDROGEN (%)
LAB ID
MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 3,95 2,98 3,10 0,38
9a 3,99 2,00 2,08 -2,01
12a 4,20 3,03 3,16 0,52
18a 3,63 2,74 2,84 -0,23
21a 4,45 2,84 2,97 0,07
36a** 3,80 2,56 2,66 -0,66
99a** 3,70 3,10 3,22 0,65
177a** 3,01 3,38 3,48 1,27
Number of results 8 8 8
OUTLIERS - - 0 0 -
AVERAGE - 3,84 2,83 2,94 -
MEDIAN - 2,91 3,04 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0,42 0,43 -
REPRODUCIBILITY
UPPER LIMIT - - 3,19 -
LOWER LIMIT - - - 2,69 -
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : NITROGEN(%)
LAB ID
MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 3,95 1,36 1,42 0,64
9a** 3,99 11,24 11,71 81,97
12a** 4,20 1,54 1,61 2,15
18a** 3,63 1,11 1,15 -1,45
99a 3,70 1,37 1,42 0,69
177a 3,01 1,31 1,35 0,12
Number of results 6 6 6 -
OUTLIERS - - 1 1 -
AVERAGE - 3,75 1,34 1,34 -
MEDIAN - 1,36 1,38 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0,15 0,13 - REPRODUCIBILITY UPPER LIMIT - - - 1,49 - LOWER LIMIT - - - 1,19 -
Page 20 of 22
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : ASH FUSION TEMPERATURES (oC)
LAB ID DEFORMATION SOFTENING HEMISPHERE FLOW
1a 1442 1475 1497 1500
9a 1500 1500 1500 1500
10a 1480 1500 1500 1500
18a 1440 1460 1490 1500
21a 1500 1500 1500 1500
23a 1388 1456 1484 1500
28a 1450 1468 1500 1500
38a 1500 1500 1500 1500
49a 1390 1450 1500 1500
60a 1397 1453 1500 1500
80a 1430 1450 1480 1500
95a 1450 1470 1500 1500
99a 1500 1500 1500 1500
151a** 1360 1390 1440 1500
Number of results 14 14 14 14
Outliers 0 1 1 0
AVERAGE 1445 1476 1496 1500
MEDIAN 1446 1470 1500 1500
STDEV 48 21 7 0
REPRODUCIBILITY
UPPER LIMIT 1500 1500 1500 1500
LOWER LIMIT 1365 1416 1436 1420
Z-SCORES
LAB ID DEFORMATION SOFTENING HEMISPHERE FLOW
1a -0,06 -0,03 0,11 0
9a 1,16 1,14 0,54 0
10a 0,74 1,14 0,54 0
18a -0,10 -0,72 -0,90 0
21a 1,16 1,14 0,54 0
23a -1,19 -0,91 -1,76 0
28a 0,11 -0,35 0,54 0
38a 1,16 1,14 0,54 0
49a -1,15 -1,19 0,54 0
60a -1,00 -1,05 0,54 0
80a -0,31 -1,19 -2,33 0
95a 0,11 -0,26 0,54 0
99a 1,16 1,14 0,54 0
151a -1,78 -3,99 -8,09 0
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : CHLORINE (ppm)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
12a 4,20 56 58 -
177a 3,01 53 55 -
Number of results - 2 2 2 -
OUTLIERS - - - - -
AVERAGE - 3,61 55 57 -
STD DEVIATION - - 2 3 -
MEDIAN - - 55 57 -
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : FLUORINE (ppm)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
12a 4,20 130 136 -
177a 3,01 224 231 -
Number of results - 2 2 2 -
OUTLIERS - - - - -
AVERAGE - 3,61 177 183 -
STD DEVIATION - - 66 67 -
MEDIAN - - 177 183 -
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : ASTM ASH (%)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY (%) DRY BASE (%) Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 3,95 27,07 28,18 -
172a 4,27 27,06 28,27 -
Number of results - 2 2 2 -
OUTLIERS - - - - -
AVERAGE - 4,11 27,07 28,23 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0,01 0,06 -
MEDIAN - - 27,07 28,23 -
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -APRIL 2020
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : ASTM VOLS (%)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY (%) DRY BASE (%) Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 3,95 20,22 21,05 -
172a 4,27 19,27 20,13 -
Number of results - 2 2 2 -
OUTLIERS - - - - -
AVERAGE - 4,11 19,75 20,59 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0,67 0,65 -
MEDIAN - - 19,75 20,59 -
Page 21 of 22
CONCLUSION
1. The overall ISO Ash determination trend is evenly distributed. The average, robust average and median are similar. Four outliers were detected.
2. The overall ISO volatile determination trend is evenly distributed. Four outliers were detected. The outliers
seemed to be due to a combination of analytical and calculation errors.
3. Calorific value graph is negatively biased. One outlier was detected.
4. The z-score trend for sulphur had almost equal negative and positive results. The median, robust average
and mean are the same at 1.29% dry base. Two outliers were detected by Grubbs estimate.
5. Three outliers were detected on phosphorous analysis. The median, robust average and mean compared
well with each other indicating that the extreme values did not affect the centralized values.
6. Carbon, Hydrogen and Nitrogen analysis was generally well done, with one outlier on Carbon and Nitrogen
7. AFT: One outlier was detected on the Softening and Hemisphere stages.
8. Assessment criterion for homogeneity check
8.1 Comparison of the between sample standard deviation with the standard deviation for proficiency
testing Standard deviation for ISO ash =0.18 Check value = 0.18 x 0.3 = 0.054
Between sample standard deviation = 0.046 The between standard deviation is less than the check value for the criterion assessment for
homogeneity, therefore the proficiency test samples were homogeneous.
Page 22 of 22
COAL CONCEPTS: Terms and Conditions
Return of results: Laboratories participate in proficiency testing programs on the understanding that they will be sharing their results and information anonymously with other laboratories performing the same analysis. No return of results compromises the spirit of the programs, and reports will not be sent to laboratories unless they return results. Payment in full is required from all laboratories enrolling whether they return results or not. Errors in Participant Proficiency Testing Results: Proficiency testing reports should reflect the level of accuracy that a regular testing client would receive. If a participant finds an error in their proficiency testing results, they may notify us in writing and change their submission PRIOR to the due date for return. Changes after this time will not be accepted. Coal Concepts’ reports results as submitted by participants. On occasion, it seems as though participants have mixed up the samples or not processed the samples according to the instructions. Coal Concepts cannot make assumptions of this nature and change results 'to suit'. We also cannot compromise the integrity of the programs by suggesting to some participants that they should review their results prior to the due date. (This is unfair to other participants) It is the responsibility of the participants to check all aspects of the program, including sample identification, preparation, testing instructions, calculations and reporting of the results prior to results submission. If samples are not in good condition on arrival to the participant laboratory, Coal Concepts must be notified in writing IMMEDIATELY, as often samples can be replaced in good time. Claims about samples received in bad condition will not be accepted after the report has been issued. Late Enrolments and Late Results: Late enrolment requests cannot always be accommodated, as sample manufacture must be scheduled well in advance to the shipping date of the program to allow all necessary quality assurance activities to be carried out. Shipping of PT materials and evaluating test results from PTPs out of cycle with the mainstream programs is considerably time consuming and therefore costly. In order not to disadvantage participants able to comply with time frames, Coal Concepts may charge a late fee in the following circumstances: Requests that Coal concepts staff enters results on behalf of participants Requests to record results after the due date Requests for PTP participation that is out of cycle with the scheduled dates Shipping fees and Customs clearance: Costs incurred for shipping samples and clearance of same through customs are the responsibility of the participating laboratory unless otherwise indicated Non-payment of fees: Coal Concepts retains the right to withhold reports and/or test materials and services when invoices are outstanding. Confidentiality of results: All data and information received by Coal Concepts from its clients are considered confidential unless the client has given express permission to pass on information. Definitions: The dictionary definitions of “collusion” and “falsification” are as follows. · Collusion: A secret agreement or cooperation for a fraudulent or deceitful purpose. · Falsification: Deliberately changing something to be false. In proficiency testing terms, collusion is comparing data (and perhaps changing data) to fit in with a believed “correct” result. This is contrary to the spirit of proficiency testing programs, which are issued with the intention of providing an objective comparison of a laboratory’s performance with others. Coal Concepts tries to minimise the occurrence of collusion by being aware that laboratories should be objective when they report their results, and should therefore not know the intended results at the time they are reporting to us. Answers are not provided to clients until results have been submitted. To prevent collusion and falsification our advice to clients is: DON’T confer with others about PT samples or results. DO accept the fact that everyone makes errors. DON’T average the results or opinions of every person in the laboratory before selecting the answer to be submitted. Instead, use one of the answers AS SUBMITTED to you and take advantage of the Coal Concepts internal QA services and submit all answers generated by the technicians. DO have confidence in your own results. Proficiency Testing (PT) is a compulsory part of laboratory accreditation, but it is also an important tool for giving you confidence in your results. “Enhancing” your PT results with assistance from another participant cannot increase confidence in your laboratory’s performance. Coal concepts’ testing staff are not told what the expected results are, nor what we are expecting. We subject ALL results to analysis, even if they are different. The staff have the right to check that the results we enter on their behalf are correctly transcribed. Clients are always welcome to contact Coal Concepts to seek advice or information about collusion or falsification of data. Policy for Participant Appeal of PT Performance Assessment: If participants disagree with their performance assessment in a proficiency report, they should inform Coal Concepts in writing. The response will include Coal Concepts interpretation of the outcome of the reassessment and an explanation of that outcome. (For example, explanation of a calculation, or the rationale for the outcome of the evaluation.) If a mistake has been made by Coal Concepts, it will be dealt with via Coal Concepts’ non-conformance system. Liability In no event shall a party's liability to the other party for direct damages exceed an amount equal to the value of the amount for the PT Programme, under that specific month End of report