coal concepts proficiency testing general analysis … · letter to participant 4 list of...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1 of 23
`
COAL CONCEPTS PROFICIENCY TESTING
GENERAL ANALYSIS SAMPLE
REPORT – NINETY-EIGHT
Revision 00
Final report
DATE ISSUED: 31 DECEMEBR 2019
PARTICIPANT
SCHEME COORDINATOR: K MUNSAMY
SIGNATURE: _____________________
CHECKED BY: R BABOOLAL (SCHEME MANAGER)
Disclaimer: Opinions and interpretations expressed herein are outside the scope of SANAS accreditation *Moisture in the analysis sample is not included in the SANAS schedule of accreditation as robust statistics cannot be applied.
Chlorine, Fluorine, Quick ash, ASTM ash and ASTM Volatiles is not included in the scope of accreditation.
THINKING QUALITY, QUALITY THINKING
REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2006/149731/23 (RMB INDUSTRIAL STATIONERS cc t/a)
81 CERAMIC CURVE, ALTON, RICHARDS BAY 3900 l TEL: +27(0)35 751 2446 l CEL: +27(0)83 6500151 l FAX: 0862605793
E-MAIL: [email protected] l [email protected]
LABORATORY CODE:
Page 2 of 23
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. One hundred and twenty four samples were sent to participants with 123 timeous result submissions
2. The total number of outliers found were as follows (dry base):
• ISO Ash x 4
• Quick ash x 2
• ISO Volatiles x 7
• Calorific value x 1
• Sulphur x 4
• Phosphorous x 1
• Carbon x 1
• AFT – Hemisphere x 4, Flow x 2
3. Chlorine, Fluorine, ASTM Ash & ASTM Volatile Matter participants were insufficient to warrant robust statistical calculations. The average result was used as the assigned value.
4. Trending for your laboratory is as follows:
Page 3 of 23
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM
PAGE NUMBER
Letter to participant
4
List of participants
5
Type of sample used
6
Preparation of sample
6
Homogeneity check
6
Stability check
7
ISO Ash data
8
ISO Ash z-score trend
9
Quick Ash data 10
Quick Ash trend 11
ISO Volatile matter data
12
ISO Volatile matter z-score trend
13
Calorific value data
14
Calorific value z-score trend
15
Total sulphur data
16
Total sulphur z-score trend
17
Phosphorous data and Z-Score trend
18
Carbon data / Hydrogen data / Nitrogen data
19
AFT data and z-scores
20
ASTM Ash and ASTM Volatile matter, Chlorine & Fluorine 21
Conclusion
22
Terms & Conditions 23
Page 4 of 23
Dear Participant
RE: PROFICIENCY TESTING RESULTS FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 2019 Thank you for your participation in the Coal Concepts proficiency testing scheme.
Your laboratory code is
All results are totally confidential. Any results in Bold, Italics and Underlined are outliers. Where applicable, the most
extreme outliers have been eliminated from calculations using the Grubbs estimate for outliers. Robust statistics has
been applied where possible. Analysis results have been reported on air dry and dry base. The dry base results have
been used to calculate the z-scores.
Please take note of the following:
1. Z-scores between -1 and +1 is deemed acceptable
2. Z-scores between -2 and -3 should serve as a warning that the analysis result could get worse
3. Z-scores between +2 and +3 should also serve as a warning that analysis results could get worse.
4. Z- scores lower than -3 and exceeding +3 should warrant an investigation
5. Compare your result to the robust average which will be the assigned value. The measurement of uncertainty (UoM)
of the results is also stated.
6. All calculations can be made available upon request
The Coal Concepts scheme adheres to the requirements of ISO/IEC 17043:2010 – Conformity assessment – General
requirements for proficiency testing.
Statistical analysis has been carried out using ISO/IEC 13528:2015-Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by
interlaboratory comparisons
Please find results attached together with Z-score trends.
Best Regards
R Baboolal
Page 5 of 23
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER
Arcelor Mittal - Vanderbijl Park Arcelor Mittal - Newcastle
Anglo SOC - Goedehoop Colliery South Plant Anglo SOC - Goedehoop Colliery North Plant
Anglo SOC - Kleinkopje Colliery Anglo SOC - Greenside Colliery
Afrisam - Dudfield Alfred H Knight -Richards Bay Laboratory
Afrisam - Ulco AquaSpecto
Botswana Power Corporation - Morupule B Power Station Bureau Veritas Inspectorate Laboratories - Middelburg
Bureau Veritas – Moatize, Vale Bureau Veritas - Nacala
Bureau Veritas Inspectorate Laboratories - Tendele Bureau Veritas Inspectorate Laboratories - Beira
Bureau Veritas Inspectorate Laboratories - Alton Bureau Veritas Testing & Inspection SA - Pretoria
Cotecna South Africa - AMR Cotecna South Africa - Nasonti
Cotecna South Africa - Lurco Cotecna South Africa - Phola
Cotecna South Africa – Tselentis Cotecna South Africa - Kangala
Cotecna South Africa - Middelburg Cotecna Ubumbene(Pty)Ltd - Umlabu
- Umlabu Cotecna South Africa - Mimosa Cotecna South Africa - VDD
Cotecna South Africa - Droogvallei
Delmas Coal Eyethu Coal Mooifontein
Eyethu Coal Wilge Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Matimba Power Station
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd – Kendal Power station Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Duvha Power Station
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd – Lethabo Power Station Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Komati Power Station
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Tutuka Power Station Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Grootvlei Power Station
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - ERID Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Kriel Power Station
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Hendrina Power Station Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd – Majuba Power Station
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Arnot Power Station Exxaro Resources - Grootegeluk Mine
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd - Matla Power Station Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd – Medupi Power Station
Exxaro Resources - Matla Mine G&W Base & Industrial Minerals
Glencore Wonderkop Glencore -Rustenburg Smelter
Glencore Boshoek Smelter Glencore -Lydenburg Smelter
Glencore Lion Smelter
HighVeld Laboratories Hwange Colliery – Zimbabwe
Intertek Mozambique Idwala Lime
Jindal Mining SA Pty Ltd – Kiepersol Colliery
Khwezela Colliery - Landau Kangra Coal (Pty) Ltd
Lafarge Industries SA (Pty) Ltd - Lichtenburg Mpumamanzi Group CC
Morupule Coal Mine - Botswana Mafube Colliery Mine PTY (Ltd)
Msobo Coal PTY Ltd Mitra SK South Africa (PTY) Ltd
M L Coal PTY Ltd Noko Analytical Services CC - Welgemeend
Noko Analytical Services CC - Hakahno Noko Analytical Services CC - Twistdraai
Noko Analytical Services CC - Witbank Quality Ensure Eastside Laboratory
Richards Bay Minerals Ronewa Lab
RSA Labs
Seriti - Kriel Colliery Seriti - New Vaal Colliery
Siza Coal Services - Wescoal Siza Coal Services - Vlakfontein
Siza Coal Services - Botswana Siza Coal Services - Kinross
Siza Coal Services - Middelburg Siza Coal Services - NCC
Siza Coal Services - Carolina Siza Coal Services - Mooiplaats
Siza Coal Services - Wildfontein Siza Coal Services - Sasolburg
Siza Coal Services - Umlalazi South 32 – Khutala Colliery
Sibonisiwe Coal Laboratory Services CC - Vaalbult Sibonisiwe Coal Laboratory Services CC - West Coal Processing
Sibonisiwe Coal Laboratory Services CC Sibonisiwe Coal Laboratory Services CC – Mzimkhulu
Sibonisiwe Coal Laboratory Services CC – Elandsfontein
SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd – Richards Bay Coal Terminal Laboratory SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd - Leeuwpan Laboratory
SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd - Trichardt Laboratory SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd – Richards Bay Port Laboratory
SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd – GGV Laboratory SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd - Middelburg Laboratory
SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd - Impunzi Laboratory SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd - Wondefontein Laboratory
SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd - Chilwavuhusiku Laboratory SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd – Tweefontein Laboratory
SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd - Londani Laboratory SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd - Zonnebloem Laboratory
SABS Commercial SOC Ltd CSIR SABS Commercial SOC Ltd Richards bay
SABS Commercial SOC Ltd Uitkomst SABS Commercial SOC Ltd Secunda
SPTE Lab - Middelburg SABS Commercial SOC Ltd Springlake
Tata Steel – Wales Lab, Europe UIS Analytical Services
Umzamo Analytical Services - Overlooked Colliery Umzamo Analytical Services - Witbank
Umzamo Analytical Services - Doornrug Umzamo Analytical Services - Sudor
Vitrovian Analytical Services DELMAS Zululand Anthracite Colliery
Page 6 of 23
1. TYPE OF SAMPLE USED
The coal used in this proficiency testing round was bituminous coal
2. PREPARATION OF SAMPLE
Approximately 1000kg’s of sample with an approximate topsize of 50mm was sourced. This was crushed to -
4mm using a jaw crusher. The -4mm material was reduced to -212um using a cross beat pulveriser. The 212
material was sieved using a 212um screen. Any +212um material was pulverised and sieved until all material
passed through the 212 um sieve.
All the -212um material was then mixed in a mixing drum for 4 hours.
3. HOMOGENEITY CHECK
There were 120 participants in this round, 10 portions of sample were randomly extracted. These were
packaged in their final form i.e. in 200ml sample bottles. The bottles were labelled 1 to 20. The results were as
follows:
SAMPLE NO. TEST PORTION 1 TEST
PORTION 2 sample av (Xt) range (Wt) range sqd
1 13.65 13.63 13.64 0.02 0.0004
2 13.75 13.59 13.67 0.16 0.0256
3 13.63 13.64 13.64 0.01 0.0001
4 13.66 13.77 13.72 0.11 0.0121
5 13.7 13.8 13.75 0.10 0.0100
6 13.7 13.67 13.69 0.03 0.0009
7 13.66 13.69 13.68 0.03 0.0009
8 13.73 13.72 13.73 0.01 0.0001
9 13.58 13.72 13.65 0.14 0.0196
10 13.59 13.7 13.65 0.11 0.0121
GENERAL AVERAGE 13.68 STANDARD DEVIATION 0.039 WITHIN SAMPLE STANDARD DEVIATION 0.064
BETWEEN SAMPLE STANDARD DEVIATION 0.022
The between sample standard deviation must be ≤ 0.3 x ơ
(ơ = std deviation for the proficiency assessment)
Ơ = 2% of the mean was used, which is the repeatability for ISO ash (Ash % > 10%)
Hence 0.3 x 0.274 = 0.082
Since 0.022 < 0.082, the samples are homogenous
Page 7 of 23
4. STABILITY CHECK Samples were retained for sales as reference material. Ten of them were randomly chosen for stability testing.
In order for the proficiency testing samples to be declared stable the general average from the homogeneity
check and that of the stability check the difference in the general average should not differ by more than 0.3 X
precision.
This test has been carried out about a month after the samples were received by the participating laboratories
SAMPLE NO. TEST PORTION 1 TEST
PORTION 2 sample av (Xt) range (Wt) range sqd
1 13.61 13.61 13.61 0.00 0.0000
2 13.69 13.65 13.67 0.04 0.0016
3 13.58 13.57 13.58 0.01 0.0001
4 13.71 13.74 13.73 0.03 0.0009
5 13.62 13.64 13.63 0.02 0.0004
6 13.63 13.59 13.61 0.04 0.0016
7 13.59 13.76 13.68 0.17 0.0289
8 13.53 13.68 13.61 0.15 0.0225
9 13.64 13.62 13.63 0.02 0.0004
10 13.71 13.7 13.71 0.01 0.0001
GENERAL AVERAGE 13.64 STANDARD DEVIATION 0.048 WITHIN SAMPLE STANDARD DEVIATION 0.053
BETWEEN SAMPLE STANDARD DEVIATION 0.030
(Ơ = 0.274 was used)
For this report 0.3 x 0.274 = 0.082
Absolute value of (13.64– 13.68) = 0.04
Since 0.04 < 0.194 the proficiency testing samples were stable
Page 8 of 23
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : ISO ASH (%)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY (%) DRY BASE (%) Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 5.16 13.65 14.39 0.75
6a 4.45 13.56 14.19 -1.02
9a 4.30 13.53 14.14 -1.49
10a 4.30 13.60 14.21 -0.85
12a 5.10 13.60 14.33 0.20
13a 4.20 13.60 14.20 -0.98
15a 4.70 13.58 14.25 -0.51
18a 4.23 13.89 14.50 1.72
21a 4.83 13.60 14.29 -0.15
23a 4.18 13.75 14.35 0.37
24a 4.40 13.64 14.27 -0.35
26a 4.00 13.80 14.38 0.59
27a 4.08 13.75 14.33 0.24
28a 3.78 13.90 14.45 1.22
30a 4.51 13.64 14.28 -0.21
32a 4.40 13.70 14.33 0.20
33a 4.60 13.65 14.31 0.00
35a 4.86 13.56 14.25 -0.48
36a 4.20 13.90 14.51 1.77
37a 4.70 13.60 14.27 -0.32
38a 4.33 13.48 14.09 -1.91
42a 4.12 13.69 14.28 -0.26
49a 4.13 13.62 14.21 -0.89
58a 3.82 13.79 14.34 0.26
59a 4.16 13.70 14.29 -0.11
60a 4.29 13.74 14.36 0.42
61a 4.10 13.70 14.29 -0.19
66a 4.20 13.80 14.41 0.86
71a 3.20 13.80 14.26 -0.45
72a 5.27 13.75 14.51 1.82
74a 4.73 13.77 14.45 1.28
76a 3.70 13.63 14.15 -1.35
78a 1.29 13.98 14.16 -1.27
79a 4.66 13.70 14.37 0.54
80a 5.00 13.70 14.42 1.00
82a 4.60 13.82 14.49 1.57
83a 4.60 13.71 14.37 0.56
88a 4.75 13.70 14.38 0.66
91a 3.40 13.70 14.18 -1.10
92a 4.83 13.73 14.43 1.05
95a 4.30 13.75 14.37 0.53
96a 4.87 13.78 14.49 1.56
97a 3.19 13.86 14.32 0.08
99a 4.30 13.80 14.42 0.99
100a 4.58 13.64 14.29 -0.11
101a 4.53 13.72 14.37 0.56
105a 3.60 13.50 14.00 -2.67
106a 4.54 13.70 14.35 0.39
108a 4.29 13.80 14.42 0.97
109a 4.70 13.80 14.48 1.52
110a 4.05 13.81 14.39 0.75
112a 4.20 13.70 14.30 -0.06
117a 4.70 13.75 14.43 1.06
124a 3.62 13.82 14.34 0.28
126a 4.06 13.76 14.34 0.30
131a 3.68 13.84 14.37 0.54
132a 4.36 13.52 14.14 -1.50
135a 4.86 13.71 14.40 0.85
136a 4.02 13.70 14.27 -0.30
137a 4.20 13.70 14.30 -0.06
143a 3.76 13.70 14.24 -0.64
145a 5.12 13.70 14.44 1.16
151a 5.00 13.62 14.34 0.26
161a 4.00 13.60 14.17 -1.24
162a 4.57 13.67 14.32 0.15
166a 4.55 13.78 14.44 1.14
167a 3.90 13.70 14.26 -0.45
168a 3.22 14.30 14.78 4.11
169a 4.14 13.70 14.29 -0.14
170a 4.20 13.80 14.41 0.86
171a 2.58 13.40 13.75 -4.86
173a 18.09 13.60 16.60 20.17
177a 3.17 17.70 18.28 34.89
180a 4.53 13.57 14.21 -0.82
184a 4.10 13.56 14.14 -1.48
190a 4.20 13.50 14.09 -1.9
191a 4.20 13.40 13.99 -2.81
192a 4.20 13.60 14.20 -0.98
193a 4.10 13.60 14.18 -1.11
194a 4.38 13.66 14.29 -0.19
195a 4.45 13.61 14.24 -0.56
196a 3.87 13.65 14.20 -0.95
197a 4.43 13.73 14.37 0.52
200a 3.89 13.79 14.35 0.36
Number of results - 84 84 84 -
OUTLIERS - - 2 4 -
AVERAGE - 4.43 13.69 14.31 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0.11 0.11 -
MEDIAN 13.70 14.32
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 13.69 14.31 -
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0.12 0.12 -
UoM 0.02 0.02
Page 9 of 23
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
Z-SC
OR
E
LABORATORY ID
ISO ASH Z-SCORE TREND
Page 10 of 23
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : QUICK ASH (%)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY (%) DRY BASE (%)
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
8a 3.40 13.70 14.18 -0.09
21a 4.83 13.48 14.16 -0.18
22a 2.82 13.74 14.14 -0.31
23a 4.18 13.85 14.45 1.27
24a 4.40 13.57 14.19 -0.03
35a 4.86 13.40 14.08 -0.58
36a 4.20 13.40 13.99 -1.07
37a 4.70 13.60 14.27 0.35
39a 4.18 13.50 14.09 -0.56
41a 3.50 13.80 14.30 0.50
49a 4.13 13.52 14.10 -0.49
50a 4.22 14.04 14.66 2.30
59a 4.16 13.63 14.22 0.10
73a 4.37 13.60 14.22 0.10
74a 4.73 13.78 14.46 1.32
77a 5.00 13.60 14.32 0.58
84a 5.51 13.62 14.41 1.07
92a 4.83 13.62 14.31 0.55
94a 4.95 13.48 14.18 -0.09
98a 2.50 11.11 11.39 -14.09
100a 4.58 13.55 14.20 0.00
101a 4.53 13.65 14.30 0.49
102a 3.80 13.50 14.03 -0.84
105a 3.60 13.50 14.00 -0.99
126a 4.06 13.45 14.02 -0.91
130a 4.60 13.40 14.05 -0.78
131a 3.68 13.70 14.22 0.11
132a 4.36 13.19 13.79 -2.06
133a 3.20 13.43 13.87 -1.64
136a 4.02 13.65 14.22 0.11
137a 4.20 13.81 14.42 1.08
140a 4.27 13.63 14.24 0.19
143a 3.76 13.73 14.27 0.33
145a 5.12 13.60 14.33 0.67
147a 4.60 13.50 14.15 -0.25
153a 4.34 13.70 14.32 0.61
160a 4.34 13.80 14.43 1.13
161a 4.00 13.50 14.06 -0.69
162a 4.57 13.70 14.36 0.78
163a 4.30 14.00 14.63 2.15
164a 4.34 13.70 14.32 0.61
168a 3.22 14.55 15.03 4.19
169a 4.14 13.80 14.40 0.98
176a 4.10 14.00 14.60 2.00
178a 3.83 13.85 14.40 1.0
181a 4.20 13.40 13.99 -1.07
182a 3.64 13.60 14.11 -0.44
183a 3.90 13.80 14.36 0.80
184a 4.10 13.50 14.08 -0.62
185a 4.57 13.30 13.94 -1.33
187a 3.78 13.53 14.06 -0.70
188a 3.88 13.88 14.44 1.20
189a 4.29 13.43 14.03 -0.85
190a 4.20 13.40 13.99 -1.07
191a 4.20 13.20 13.78 -2.12
192a 4.20 13.50 14.09 -0.55
193a 4.10 13.60 14.18 -0.10
194a 4.39 13.60 14.22 0.12
196a 3.87 13.25 13.78 -2.10
Number of results - 59 59 59 -
OUTLIERS - - 2 2 -
AVERAGE - 4.18 13.60 14.20 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0.19 0.20 -
MEDIAN 13.60 14.20
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 13.60 14.20 -
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0.20 0.22 -
UoM 0.03 0.04
Page 11 of 23
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00Z-
SCO
RE
LABORATORY ID
QUICK ASH Z-SCORE TREND
Page 12 of 23 COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : ISO VOLATILE MATTER (%)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 5.16 25.71 27.11 -0.99
6a 4.45 26.04 27.25 -0.63
8a 3.40 27.20 28.16 1.61
9a 4.30 26.70 27.90 0.97
10a 4.30 26.50 27.69 0.46
12a 5.10 25.40 26.77 -1.84
13a 4.20 26.50 27.66 0.38
15a 4.70 25.86 27.14 -0.92
18a 4.23 26.33 27.49 -0.03
21a 4.83 26.10 27.42 -0.20
22a 2.82 26.38 27.15 -0.90
23a 4.18 26.04 27.18 -0.82
24a 4.40 21.54 22.53 -12.35
26a 4.00 26.62 27.73 0.55
27a 4.08 26.23 27.35 -0.40
28a 3.78 26.10 27.13 -0.95
30a 4.51 26.14 27.37 -0.33
32a 4.40 26.50 27.72 0.53
33a 4.60 26.05 27.31 -0.50
35a 4.86 25.98 27.31 -0.50
36a 4.20 26.40 27.56 0.12
37a 4.70 26.10 27.39 -0.30
38a 4.33 27.30 28.54 2.55
39a 4.18 26.95 28.13 1.53
41a 3.50 26.20 27.15 -0.88
42a 4.12 26.05 27.17 -0.84
49a 4.13 26.03 27.15 -0.88
50a 4.22 27.63 28.85 3.32
58a 3.82 26.64 27.70 0.47
59a 4.16 26.57 27.72 0.54
60a 4.29 26.05 27.22 -0.72
61a 4.10 26.40 27.53 0.05
66a 4.20 25.70 26.83 -1.69
71a 3.20 26.70 27.58 0.19
72a 5.27 26.27 27.73 0.56
73a 4.37 26.94 28.17 1.65
74a 4.73 26.40 27.71 0.50
76a 3.70 26.00 27.00 -1.26
77a 5.00 31.20 32.84 13.23
78a 1.29 26.96 27.31 -0.48
79a 4.66 25.76 27.02 -1.21
80a 5.00 26.10 27.47 -0.08
82a 4.60 26.43 27.70 0.49
83a 4.60 26.60 27.88 0.93
88a 4.75 26.13 27.43 -0.20
91a 3.40 27.00 27.95 1.10
92a 4.83 23.59 24.79 -6.74
94a 4.95 27.10 28.51 2.49
95a 4.30 26.30 27.48 -0.06
96a 4.87 25.99 27.32 -0.46
97a 3.19 26.61 27.49 -0.05
98a 2.50 28.46 29.19 4.17
99a 4.30 26.10 27.27 -0.58
100a 4.58 26.24 27.50 -0.02
101a 4.53 26.30 27.55 0.10
102a 3.80 26.20 27.23 -0.67
105a 3.60 27.00 28.01 1.24
106a 4.54 27.32 28.62 2.76
108a 4.29 26.05 27.22 -0.72
109a 4.70 26.00 27.28 -0.56
110a 4.05 26.30 27.41 -0.24
112a 4.20 26.40 27.56 0.12
117a 4.70 25.75 27.02 -1.21
124a 3.62 25.79 26.76 -1.86
126a 4.06 27.02 28.16 1.63
130a 4.60 26.40 27.67 0.41
131a 3.68 27.04 28.07 1.40
132a 4.36 26.43 27.63 0.32
133a 3.20 28.28 29.21 4.22
135a 4.86 25.53 26.83 -1.69
136a 4.02 26.54 27.65 0.36
137a 4.20 26.65 27.82 0.77
140a 4.27 26.29 27.46 -0.11
143a 3.76 26.47 27.50 -0.01
145a 5.12 26.10 27.51 0.00
147a 4.60 26.13 27.39 -0.29
151a 5.00 25.77 27.13 -0.94
161a 4.00 26.60 27.71 0.50
162a 4.57 26.15 27.40 -0.26
166a 4.55 25.80 27.03 -1.18
167a 3.90 26.60 27.68 0.43
168a 3.22 26.39 27.27 -0.59
169a 4.14 26.30 27.44 -0.18
170a 4.20 26.30 27.45 -0.13
173a 18.09 27.28 33.30 14.38
180a 4.53 26.80 28.07 1.40
181a 4.20 26.30 27.45 -0.13
182a 3.64 26.00 26.98 -1.30
183a 3.90 26.23 27.29 -0.53
184a 4.10 26.50 27.63 0.31
187a 3.78 27.10 28.16 1.63
188a 3.88 27.13 28.22 1.77
189a 4.29 26.44 27.63 0.29
190a 4.20 26.20 27.35 -0.39
191a 4.20 26.40 27.56 0.12
192a 4.20 25.90 27.04 -1.17
193a 4.10 26.30 27.42 -0.20
194a 4.38 26.49 27.70 0.49
195a 4.45 26.57 27.81 0.74
196a 3.87 27.18 28.27 1.90
197a 4.43 25.98 27.18 -0.80
200a 3.89 25.47 26.50 -2.49
NUMBER OF RESULTS - 102 102 102 -
OUTLIERS - - 5 7 -
AVERAGE - 4.34 26.37 27.51 -
STD DEVIATION - 0.44 0.40 -
MEDIAN 26.30 27.47
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 26.37 27.51 -
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0.48 0.44 -
UoM - - 0.06 0.06 -
Page 13 of 23
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
92a
200a
124a
12a
66a
135a
182a
76a
79a
117a
166a
192a
1a 28a
151a
15a
22a
41a
49a
42a
23a
197a
108a
60a
102a
6a 168a
99a
109a
183a
33a
35a
78a
96a
27a
190a
30a
37a
147a
162a
110a
193a
21a
88a
169a
170a
181a
140a
80a
95a
97a
18a
100a
143a
145a
61a
101a
112a
191a
36a
71a
189a
184a
132a
136a
13a
130a
167a
10a
58a
194a
82a
161a
74a
32a
59a
26a
72a
195a
137a
83a
9a 91a
105a
180a
131a
39a
8a 126a
187a
73a
188a
196a
94a
38a
106a
50a
98a
133a
77a
173aZ-SC
OR
E
LABORATORY ID
VOLATILE MATTER Z-SCORE TREND
Page 14 of 23 COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : CALORIFIC VALUE (MJ/kg)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY (MJ/kg) DRY BASE (MJ/kg) Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 5.16 26.32 27.75 0.51
6a 4.45 26.57 27.81 0.79
8a 3.40 26.75 27.69 0.21
9a 4.30 26.47 27.66 0.05
10a 4.30 26.40 27.59 -0.32
12a 5.10 26.32 27.73 0.42
18a 4.23 26.38 27.55 -0.52
21a 4.83 26.25 27.58 -0.34
23a 4.18 26.41 27.56 -0.44
24a 4.40 26.48 27.70 0.23
27a 4.08 26.34 27.46 -0.95
28a 3.78 26.53 27.57 -0.39
30a 4.51 26.48 27.73 0.40
32a 4.40 26.37 27.58 -0.33
33a 4.60 26.32 27.59 -0.30
35a 4.86 26.41 27.76 0.55
36a 4.20 26.37 27.53 -0.62
37a 4.70 26.41 27.71 0.31
38a 4.33 27.83 29.09 7.20
39a 4.18 26.54 27.70 0.24
42a 4.12 26.36 27.49 -0.79
43a 4.34 26.50 27.70 0.26
49a 4.13 26.59 27.74 0.43
50a 4.22 26.28 27.44 -1.06
58a 3.82 26.56 27.61 -0.17
60a 4.29 26.46 27.65 0.0
61a 4.10 26.83 27.98 1.64
66a 4.20 26.34 27.49 -0.78
71a 3.20 26.51 27.39 -1.32
72a 5.27 26.48 27.95 1.52
73a 4.37 26.65 27.87 1.09
74a 4.73 26.57 27.89 1.20
76a 3.70 26.72 27.75 0.48
77a 5.00 26.04 27.41 -1.20
79a 4.66 26.39 27.68 0.15
80a 5.00 25.85 27.21 -2.20
82a 4.60 26.18 27.44 -1.06
83a 4.60 26.44 27.71 0.33
84a 5.51 26.05 27.57 -0.40
88a 4.75 26.41 27.73 0.40
91a 3.40 26.88 27.83 0.88
92a 4.83 26.30 27.63 -0.08
94a 4.95 26.07 27.42 -1.14
95a 4.30 26.94 28.15 2.50
96a 4.87 26.18 27.52 -0.65
97a 3.19 26.73 27.61 -0.20
98a 2.50 26.77 27.46 -0.97
99a 4.30 26.47 27.66 0.05
100a 4.58 26.27 27.53 -0.59
101a 4.53 26.23 27.47 -0.88
102a 3.80 26.25 27.29 -1.81
105a 3.60 26.64 27.63 -0.07
106a 4.54 26.34 27.59 -0.30
108a 4.29 26.40 27.58 -0.33
109a 4.70 26.39 27.69 0.21
110a 4.05 26.44 27.56 -0.47
112a 4.20 26.32 27.47 -0.88
117a 4.70 26.50 27.81 0.79
124a 3.62 26.68 27.68 0.16
126a 4.06 26.51 27.63 -0.09
130a 4.60 26.49 27.77 0.59
131a 3.68 26.57 27.59 -0.32
132a 4.36 27.31 28.55 4.53
133a 3.20 27.56 28.47 4.09
135a 4.86 26.51 27.86 1.04
136a 4.02 26.37 27.47 -0.88
137a 4.20 27.13 28.32 3.35
140a 4.27 26.70 27.89 1.21
143a 3.76 26.55 27.59 -0.31
145a 5.12 26.61 28.05 1.98
147a 4.60 26.30 27.57 -0.41
151a 5.00 26.39 27.78 0.65
153a 4.34 26.38 27.58 -0.36
160a 4.34 26.88 28.10 2.25
161a 4.00 26.53 27.64 -0.07
162a 4.57 25.83 27.07 -2.91
163a 4.30 26.65 27.85 0.99
164a 4.34 26.50 27.70 0.26
167a 3.90 26.68 27.76 0.56
168a 3.22 26.82 27.71 0.31
169a 4.14 26.35 27.49 -0.81
170a 4.20 26.48 27.64 -0.04
171a 2.58 27.10 27.82 0.84
172a 4.71 25.97 27.25 -1.98
176a 4.10 26.63 27.77 0.59
177a 3.17 26.69 27.56 -0.43
180a 4.53 27.53 28.83 5.91
181a 4.20 26.77 27.94 1.47
182a 3.64 26.17 27.16 -2.46
183a 3.90 27.97 29.11 7.28
184a 4.10 26.63 27.77 0.59
187a 3.78 26.46 27.50 -0.77
188a 3.88 27.43 28.54 4.44
189a 4.29 26.70 27.90 1.24
190a 4.20 26.51 27.67 0.11
191a 4.20 26.45 27.61 -0.20
192a 4.20 26.56 27.72 0.37
193a 4.10 26.53 27.66 0.07
194a 4.38 26.69 27.91 1.31
195a 4.45 26.38 27.61 -0.21
196a 3.87 26.47 27.54 -0.57
197a 4.43 26.14 27.35 -1.49
200a 3.89 26.63 27.71 0.29
NUMBER OF RESULTS - 103 103 103 -
OUTLIERS - - 6 6 -
AVERAGE - 4.25 26.47 27.65 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0.23 0.20 -
MEDIAN 26.47 27.64
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 26.47 27.65 -
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0.25 0.21 -
UoM - - 0.03 0.03 -
Page 15 of 23
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
162a
182a
80a
172a
102a
197a
71a
77a
94a
82a
50a
98a
27a
112a
136a
101a
169a
42a
66a
187a
96a
36a
100a
196a
18a
110a
23a
177a
147a
84a
28a
153a
21a
108a
32a
131a
10a
143a
33a
106a
195a
191a
97a
58a
126a
92a
105a
161a
170a
60a
9a 99a
193a
190a
79a
124a
109a
8a 24a
39a
43a
164a
200a
168a
37a
83a
192a
88a
30a
12a
49a
76a
1a 35a
167a
130a
176a
184a
151a
117a
6a 171a
91a
163a
135a
73a
74a
140a
189a
194a
181a
72a
61a
145a
160a
95a
137a
133a
188a
132a
180a
38a
183aZ-SC
OR
E
LABORATORY ID
CALORIFIC VALUE Z-SCORE TREND
Page 16 of 23
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : TOTAL SULPHUR (%)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 5.16 0.43 0.45 -0.49
6a 4.45 0.43 0.45 -0.56
9a 4.30 0.41 0.43 -1.04
10a 4.30 0.43 0.45 -0.58
12a 5.10 0.41 0.43 -0.96
13a 4.20 0.47 0.49 0.34
15a 4.70 0.42 0.44 -0.77
18a 4.23 0.54 0.56 1.96
21a 4.83 0.53 0.56 1.80
23a 4.18 0.47 0.49 0.33
24a 4.40 0.41 0.43 -1.03
26a 4.00 0.47 0.49 0.31
27a 4.08 0.41 0.43 -1.06
28a 3.78 0.54 0.56 1.90
30a 4.51 0.37 0.38 -2.06
32a 4.40 0.44 0.46 -0.33
35a 4.86 0.42 0.44 -0.75
36a 4.20 0.47 0.49 0.34
37a 4.70 0.46 0.48 0.00
38a 4.33 0.48 0.50 0.58
39a 4.18 0.50 0.52 1.03
42a 4.12 0.42 0.44 -0.83
49a 4.13 0.44 0.46 -0.36
50a 4.22 0.44 0.46 -0.35
58a 3.82 0.48 0.50 0.52
60a 4.29 0.41 0.43 -1.04
61a 4.10 0.46 0.48 0.09
66a 4.20 0.47 0.49 0.34
71a 3.20 0.88 0.91 9.59
72a 5.27 0.44 0.46 -0.24
74a 4.73 0.53 0.56 1.79
76a 3.70 0.45 0.47 -0.18
78a 1.29 0.42 0.43 -1.10
79a 4.66 0.35 0.37 -2.39
80a 5.00 0.43 0.45 -0.50
83a 4.60 0.46 0.48 0.00
88a 4.75 0.35 0.37 -2.39
91a 3.40 0.47 0.49 0.25
95a 4.30 0.46 0.48 0.00
97a 3.19 0.41 0.42 -1.15
99a 4.30 0.43 0.45 -0.58
101a 4.53 0.45 0.47 -0.09
106a 4.54 0.50 0.52 1.07
108a 4.29 0.40 0.42 -1.27
109a 4.70 0.40 0.42 -1.23
110a 4.05 0.46 0.48 0.00
112a 4.20 0.45 0.47 -0.12
126a 4.06 0.53 0.55 1.70
130a 4.60 0.49 0.51 0.85
131a 3.68 0.46 0.48 0.00
132a 4.36 0.48 0.50 0.59
133a 3.20 0.79 0.82 7.53
135a 4.86 0.47 0.49 0.41
136a 4.02 0.49 0.51 0.78
137a 4.20 0.50 0.52 1.03
140a 4.27 0.44 0.46 -0.35
143a 3.76 0.45 0.47 -0.17
145a 5.12 0.43 0.45 -0.49
151a 5.00 0.49 0.52 0.89
161a 4.00 0.44 0.46 -0.38
162a 4.57 0.55 0.58 2.23
167a 3.90 0.47 0.49 0.30
168a 3.22 0.52 0.54 1.37
169a 4.14 0.43 0.45 -0.59
172a 4.71 0.56 0.59 2.48
173a 18.09 0.42 0.51 0.83
177a 3.17 1.01 1.04 12.55
180a 4.53 0.49 0.51 0.84
181a 4.20 0.47 0.49 0.34
183a 3.90 0.50 0.52 0.99
184a 4.10 0.46 0.48 0.00
187a 3.78 0.80 0.83 7.87
188a 3.88 0.45 0.47 -0.16
189a 4.29 0.48 0.50 0.58
190a 4.20 0.42 0.44 -0.82
191a 4.20 0.46 0.48 0.00
192a 4.20 0.39 0.41 -1.51
193a 4.10 0.41 0.43 -1.06
194a 4.38 0.46 0.48 0.00
196a 3.87 0.42 0.44 -0.85
200a 3.89 0.46 0.48 0.0
NUMBER OF RESULTS 81 81 81 -
OUTLIERS - - 4 4 -
AVERAGE - 4.39 0.45 0.48
MEDIAN - 0.46 0.48
STD DEVIATION - - 0.04 0.05
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 0.45 0.48 -
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0.05 0.05 -
UoM - - 0.01 0.01
Page 17 of 23
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
79a
88a
30a
192a
108a
109a
97a
78a
27a
193a
60a
9a 24a
12a
196a
42a
190a
15a
35a
169a
10a
99a
6a 80a
145a
1a 161a
49a
50a
140a
32a
72a
76a
143a
188a
112a
101a
37a
83a
95a
110a
131a
184a
191a
194a
200a
61a
91a
167a
26a
23a
13a
36a
66a
181a
135a
58a
189a
38a
132a
136a
173a
180a
130a
151a
183a
39a
137a
106a
168a
126a
74a
21a
28a
18a
162a
172a
133a
187a
71a
177aZ-
SCO
RE
LABORATORY ID
TOTAL SULPHUR Z-SCORE TREND
Page 18 of 23
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
38a 9a 74a 21a 78a 23a 169a 114a 12a 18a 26a 112a 13a 99a 1a 109a 24a 172a 177a 173a
Z-SC
OR
ES
LAB ID
PHOSPHOROUS IN COAL Z-SCORES
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : PHOSPHOROUS IN COAL (%)
LAB ID
MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 5.16 0.140 0.148 0.41
9a 4.30 0.097 0.101 -0.80
12a 5.10 0.127 0.134 0.05
13a 4.20 0.139 0.145 0.34
18a 4.23 0.129 0.135 0.07
21a 4.83 0.098 0.103 -0.75
23a 4.18 0.108 0.113 -0.50
24a 4.40 0.150 0.156 0.63
26a 4.00 0.130 0.135 0.08
38a 4.33 0.083 0.086 -1.18
74a 4.73 0.098 0.103 -0.75
78a 1.29 0.111 0.112 -0.50
99a 4.30 0.140 0.146 0.37
109a 4.70 0.144 0.151 0.50
112a 4.20 0.134 0.140 0.21
114a 4.34 0.118 0.123 -0.22
169a 4.14 0.113 0.118 -0.36
172a 4.71 0.164 0.172 1.04
173a 18.09 1.034 1.262 29.25
177a 3.17 0.179 0.185 1.37
Number of results - 20 20 20 -
OUTLIERS - - 1 1 -
AVERAGE - 4.92 0.126 0.132 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0.037 0.039 -
MEDIAN - 0.129 0.135
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 0.126 0.131
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0.025 0.027
UoM - - 0.007 0.008
Page 19 of 23
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : TOTAL CARBON (%)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 5.16 66.22 69.82 -0.57
9a 4.30 48.63 50.82 -17.42
12a 5.10 66.14 69.69 -0.68
18a** 4.23 66.39 69.32 -1.01
21a** 4.83 69.40 72.92 2.18
42a 4.12 67.88 70.80 0.30
49a 4.13 67.80 70.72 0.23
88a 4.75 67.40 70.76 0.26
99a 4.30 67.10 70.11 -0.31
108a 4.29 66.60 69.59 -0.78
109a 4.70 66.30 69.57 -0.79
145a** 5.12 68.60 72.30 1.63
173a 18.09 70.40 85.95 13.74
177a 3.17 67.70 69.92 -0.48
Number of results - 14 14 14 -
OUTLIERS - - 1 2 -
AVERAGE - 5.45 67.53 70.46 -
MEDIAN - - 67.40 70.02 -
STD DEVIATION - - 1.31 1.13 -
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 67.40 70.33
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 1.46 1.26
UoM - - 0.53 0.46
REPRODUCIBILITY
UPPER LIMIT - - - 71.46 -
LOWER LIMIT - - - 69.46 -
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : HYDROGEN (%)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 5.16 3.72 3.92 -0.02
9a 4.30 3.67 3.83 -0.40
12a 5.10 4.24 4.47 2.35
18a 4.23 3.77 3.94 0.04
21a 4.83 3.64 3.82 -0.4
36a** 4.20 3.39 3.54 -1.69
42a 4.12 3.92 4.09 0.70
88a 4.75 3.54 3.71 -0.93
99a 4.30 3.83 4.00 0.33
108a 4.29 3.83 4.00 0.32
109a 4.70 3.84 4.03 0.4
177a 3.17 3.65 3.77 -0.69
Number of results 12 12 12
OUTLIERS - - 0 0 -
AVERAGE - 4.43 3.75 3.93 -
MEDIAN - 3.75 3.93 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0.21 0.23 -
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 3.74 3.91
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0.17 0.18
UoM - - 0.06 0.06
REPRODUCIBILITY
UPPER LIMIT - - 4.18 -
LOWER LIMIT - - - 3.68 -
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : NITROGEN(%)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 5.16 1.61 1.70 0.04
9a 4.30 1.73 1.81 1.67
12a 5.10 1.54 1.62 -1.07
18a 4.23 1.64 1.71 0.26
42a 4.12 1.67 1.74 0.70
88a 4.75 1.49 1.56 0.0
99a 4.30 1.64 1.71 0.28
108a 4.29 1.63 1.70 0.12
109a 4.70 1.65 1.73 0.00
177a 3.17 1.60 1.65 -0.63
Number of results 10 10 10 -
OUTLIERS - - 0 0 -
AVERAGE - 4.41 1.62 1.69 -
MEDIAN - 1.64 1.71 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0.07 0.07 -
ROBUST AVERAGE - - 1.62 1.70
ROBUST STD DEVIATION - - 0.07 0.07
UoM - - 0.03 0.03
REPRODUCIBILITY
UPPER LIMIT - - - 1.84 -
LOWER LIMIT - - - 1.54 -
Page 20 of 23
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : ASH FUSION TEMPERATURES (oC)
LAB ID DEFORMATION SOFTENING HEMISPHERE FLOW
1a 1500 1500 1500 1500
9a 1440 1450 1460 1480
10a 1500 1500 1500 1500
18a 1500 1500 1500 1500
21a 1445 1465 1475 1500
23a 1433 1473 1490 1498
28a 1398 1429 1475 1500
38a 1450 1460 1470 1480
60a 1500 1500 1500 1500
80a 1420 1440 1500 1500
99a 1500 1500 1500 1500
108a 1500 1500 1500 1500
109a 1500 1500 1500 1500
131a 1500 1500 1500 1500
151a 1400 1450 1500 1500
Number of results 15 15 15 15
Outliers 0 0 4 2
AVERAGE 1466 1478 1491 1497
MEDIAN 1500 1500 1500 1500
STDEV 40 26 14 7
REPRODUCIBILITY
UPPER LIMIT 1500 1500 1500 1500
LOWER LIMIT 1386 1418 1431 1480
Z-SCORES
LAB ID DEFORMATION SOFTENING HEMISPHERE FLOW
1a 0.85 0.84 0.62 0.40
9a -0.64 -1.05 -2.25 -2.46
10a 0.85 0.84 0.62 0.40
18a 0.85 0.84 0.62 0.40
21a -0.51 -0.48 -1.17 0.40
23a -0.81 -0.18 -0.10 0.11
28a -1.68 -1.84 -1.17 0.40
38a -0.39 -0.67 -1.53 -2.46
60a 0.85 0.84 0.62 0.40
80a -1.13 -1.43 0.62 0.40
99a 0.85 0.84 0.62 0.40
108a 0.85 0.84 0.62 0.40
109a 0.85 0.84 0.62 0.40
131a 0.85 0.84 0.62 0.40
151a -1.63 -1.05 0.62 0.40
Page 21 of 23
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : ASTM ASH (%)
LAB ID MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY (%) DRY BASE (%)
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 5.16 13.67 14.41 -0.71
108a 4.29 13.80 14.42 -0.56
109a 4.70 13.80 14.48 1.46
172a 4.71 13.75 14.43 -0.20
Number of results - 4 4 4 -
OUTLIERS - - 0 0 -
AVERAGE - 4.72 13.76 14.44 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0.06 0.03 -
MEDIAN - - 13.78 14.42 -
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : ASTM VOLS (%)
LAB ID
MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY (%) DRY BASE (%)
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
1a 5.16 26.06 27.48 0.02
108a 4.29 27.07 28.28 0.83
109a 4.70 26.70 28.02 0.56
172a 4.71 24.81 26.04 -1.41
Number of results - 4 4 4 -
OUTLIERS - - 0 0 -
AVERAGE - 4.72 26.16 27.45 -
STD DEVIATION - - 0.99 1.00 -
MEDIAN - - 26.38 27.75 -
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : CHLORINE (ppm)
LAB ID
MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
12a 5.10 110 116 5.44
108a 4.29 48 50 0.81
109a 4.70 41 43 0.31
177a 3.17 22 23 -1.12
Number of results - 4 4 4 -
OUTLIERS - - 1 1 -
AVERAGE - 4.32 37 39 -
STD DEVIATION - - 13 14 -
MEDIAN - - 41 43 -
COAL CONCEPTS - PROFICIENCY TESTING -DECEMBER 2019
ANALYTICAL PARAMETER : FLUORINE (ppm)
LAB ID
MOISTURE IN ANALYSIS SAMPLE (%) AIR DRY DRY BASE
Z-SCORE (DRY BASE)
12a 5.10 120 126 -1.06
108a 4.29 212 222 0.35
109a 4.70 156 164 -0.51
177a 3.17 271 280 1.22
Number of results - 4 4 4 -
OUTLIERS - - 0 0 -
AVERAGE - 4.32 190 198 -
STD DEVIATION - - 66 67 -
MEDIAN - - 184 193 -
Page 22 of 23
CONCLUSION
1. The overall ISO Ash determination trend had an almost even z-score trend. The average, robust average and median were similar. Four outliers were detected.
2. The overall ISO volatile determination trend was evenly distributed. Seven outliers were detected. The
outliers seemed to be due to a combination of analytical and calculation errors.
3. Calorific value graph indicated an even z-score trend. Six outliers were detected. These seemed to be due to
analytical errors
4. The z-score trend for sulphur analysis was evenly distributed. The median, robust average and mean were
the same, at 0.48%. Four outliers were detected by Grubbs. The outliers seemed to be swopped samples or
analytical errors.
5. One outlier was detected on phosphorous analysis. The median, robust average and mean compared well with each other indicating that the extreme values did not affect the centralized values.
6. Carbon analysis was poorly carried out. There were two outliers and three results out of reproducibility. Hydrogen and Nitrogen was acceptable with low robust standard deviations of 0.18 and 0.07 respectively
7. AFT: There were no outliers and generally well done
8. Assessment criterion for homogeneity check (From ISO 13528, page 45)
8.1 Comparison of the between sample standard deviation with the standard deviation for proficiency testing Standard deviation for ISO ash =0.11 Check value = 0.11 x 0.3 = 0.033
Between sample standard deviation = 0.022 The between sample standard deviation is less than the check value for the criterion assessment for
homogeneity hence homogeneity has been confirmed
Page 23 of 23
COAL CONCEPTS: Terms and Conditions
Return of results: Laboratories participate in proficiency testing programs on the understanding that they will be sharing their results and information anonymously with other laboratories performing the same analysis. No return of results compromises the spirit of the programs, and reports will not be sent to laboratories unless they return results. Payment in full is required from all laboratories enrolling whether they return results or not. Errors in Participant Proficiency Testing Results: Proficiency testing reports should reflect the level of accuracy that a regular testing client would receive. If a participant finds an error in their proficiency testing results, they may notify us in writing and change their submission PRIOR to the due date for return. Changes after this time will not be accepted. Coal Concepts’ reports results as submitted by participants. On occasion, it seems as though participants have mixed up the samples or not processed the samples according to the instructions. Coal Concepts cannot make assumptions of this nature and change results 'to suit'. We also cannot compromise the integrity of the programs by suggesting to some participants that they should review their results prior to the due date. (This is unfair to other participants) It is the responsibility of the participants to check all aspects of the program, including sample identification, preparation, testing instructions, calculations and reporting of the results prior to results submission. If samples are not in good condition on arrival to the participant laboratory, Coal Concepts must be notified in writing IMMEDIATELY, as often samples can be replaced in good time. Claims about samples received in bad condition will not be accepted after the report has been issued. Late Enrolments and Late Results: Late enrolment requests cannot always be accommodated, as sample manufacture must be scheduled well in advance to the shipping date of the program to allow all necessary quality assurance activities to be carried out. Shipping of PT materials and evaluating test results from PTPs out of cycle with the mainstream programs is considerably time consuming and therefore costly. In order not to disadvantage participants able to comply with time frames, Coal Concepts may charge a late fee in the following circumstances: Requests that Coal concepts staff enters results on behalf of participants Requests to record results after the due date Requests for PTP participation that is out of cycle with the scheduled dates Shipping fees and Customs clearance: Costs incurred for shipping samples and clearance of same through customs are the responsibility of the participating laboratory unless otherwise indicated Non-payment of fees: Coal Concepts retains the right to withhold reports and/or test materials and services when invoices are outstanding. Confidentiality of results: All data and information received by Coal Concepts from its clients are considered confidential unless the client has given express permission to pass on information. Definitions: The dictionary definitions of “collusion” and “falsification” are as follows. · Collusion: A secret agreement or cooperation for a fraudulent or deceitful purpose. · Falsification: Deliberately changing something to be false. In proficiency testing terms, collusion is comparing data (and perhaps changing data) to fit in with a believed “correct” result. This is contrary to the spirit of proficiency testing programs, which are issued with the intention of providing an objective comparison of a laboratory’s performance with others. Coal Concepts tries to minimise the occurrence of collusion by being aware that laboratories should be objective when they report their results, and should therefore not know the intended results at the time they are reporting to us. Answers are not provided to clients until results have been submitted. To prevent collusion and falsification our advice to clients is: DON’T confer with others about PT samples or results. DO accept the fact that everyone makes errors. DON’T average the results or opinions of every person in the laboratory before selecting the answer to be submitted. Instead, use one of the answers AS SUBMITTED to you and take advantage of the Coal Concepts internal QA services and submit all answers generated by the technicians. DO have confidence in your own results. Proficiency Testing (PT) is a compulsory part of laboratory accreditation, but it is also an important tool for giving you confidence in your results. “Enhancing” your PT results with assistance from another participant cannot increase confidence in your laboratory’s performance. Coal concepts’ testing staff are not told what the expected results are, nor what we are expecting. We subject ALL results to analysis, even if they are different. The staff have the right to check that the results we enter on their behalf are correctly transcribed. Clients are always welcome to contact Coal Concepts to seek advice or information about collusion or falsification of data. Policy for Participant Appeal of PT Performance Assessment: If participants disagree with their performance assessment in a proficiency report, they should inform Coal Concepts in writing. The response will include Coal Concepts interpretation of the outcome of the reassessment and an explanation of that outcome. (For example, explanation of a calculation, or the rationale for the outcome of the evaluation.) If a mistake has been made by Coal Concepts, it will be dealt with via Coal Concepts’ non-conformance system. Liability In no event shall a party's liability to the other party for direct damages exceed an amount equal to the value of the amount for the PT Programme, under that specific month End of report