columbey national park - office of environment and heritage
TRANSCRIPT
Plan of Management
Columbey National Park
COLUMBEY NATIONAL PARK
PLAN OF MANAGEMENT
NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service September 2011
This plan of management was adopted by the Minister for the Environment on 22nd September 2011. Acknowledgments
The NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) acknowledges that this park is in the traditional country of the Worimi Aboriginal people. This plan of management is based on a draft plan prepared by the staff of the Hunter Region of the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, part of the Office of Environment and Heritage, Department of Premier and Cabinet. FRONT COVER: Spotted gum and Ironbark. Photo: NPWS
For additional information or any inquiries about this park or this plan of management, contact the NPWS Barrington Tops Area Office, PO Box 236 Gloucester 2422 or by telephone on (02) 6538 5300. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 © Copyright State of NSW and the Office of Environment and Heritage NSW: Use permitted with appropriate acknowledgment. ISBN 978 1 74293 370 2 OEH 2011/0821
September, 2011
Printed on recycled paper
FOREWORD Columbey National Park is located approximately 23 kilometres north-east of Maitland. It covers 868 hectares, the majority of which was reserved on 1st July 2007. Columbey National Park was reserved due to its significant vegetation features, including twelve vegetation communities. Three of these communities are listed as endangered ecological communities. These are the Lower Hunter Spotted Gum – Ironbark Forest, Floodplain Redgum-Box Forest, and Hunter Lowlands Redgum Forest. Recent fauna surveys recorded the vulnerable small marsupial brush-tailed phascogale in the park. The park provides suitable habitat for other threatened animal species which have been recorded nearby and may be present in the park. The New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 requires that a plan of management be prepared for each national park. A draft plan of management for Columbey National Park was placed on public exhibition from 11th June until 27th September 2010. The submissions received were carefully considered before adopting this plan. The plan contains a number of actions to achieve the State Plan priority to “Protect native vegetation, biodiversity, land, rivers and coastal waterways”, including monitoring vegetation recovery by mapping vegetation boundaries, assessment of extent of endangered and other ecological communities, control of weeds and pest animals, and fire management strategies. The plan also contains a number of actions to help achieve “More people using parks”, including providing a parking area and interpretive signage. Four wheel driving, horse riding, mountain bike riding and bushwalking will continue to be permitted within the park.
This plan of management establishes the scheme of operations for Columbey National Park. In accordance with section 73B of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, this plan of management is hereby adopted.
Robyn Parker Minister for the Environment
MAP 1. COLUMBEY NATIONAL PARK
Eagl
eton
Rd
Eastern Trl
Clarence
Town R
d
To Clarence Town
Tumbledown Creek
Ston
y Cr
eek
Wallaroo C
reek
Claren
ce To
wn Rd
Eagle
ton
Rd
Tow
er T
rl
Pipe
line
Trl
Cemetery Rd
Pathfinder Trl
Gully Trl
Horse Trl
Creek Trl
Eastern Trl
Waterline Trl
Wallaroo Creek Trl
Shortcut Trl
Yard Trl
Stonequarry H ill Trl
Connect i on Trl
Oak
enda
le R
d
Pipe
line
Trl
Clarence Town Rd
Columbey NP
Maitland
Newcastle
Pacific Ocean
Clarence Town
Nelson Bay
Uffington State Forest
Map 1 - Columbey National ParkLegend
0 500 1,000250Metres
Datum - AGD 1966, Projection - AMG Zone 56
Columbey NPHorse Riding Trail
Sealed Road - off parkPublic Access Roads
Unsealed Road - off parkManagement TrailPrivate Road
Non Public Access RoadsNPWS Gate
State Forest
Watercourse
Proposed Parking
4WD RoadUnsealed Road - On Park
1
1. LOCATION, GAZETTAL AND REGIONAL CONTEXT Columbey National Park (referred to as ‘the park’ in this plan) is comprised of 868 hectares, the majority of which was reserved on 1st July 2007. The park was reserved due to significant vegetation features including three vegetation communities which are listed as endangered ecological communities. Prior to becoming a national park under the National Park Estate (Lower Hunter Region Reservations) Act 2006 it was part of Uffington State Forest No. 178 (Uffington SF 178). Land reserved as Uffington SF 178 was dedicated in late 1914 (Forestry Commission NSW 1981). A smaller 80 hectare portion (referred to as the Stonequarry Hill portion) located to the west of the main park was added to Columbey National Park in 2008. Stonequarry Hill was a former quarry site that was worked from about the 1860s until the turn of the century. The park derives its name from the nearby geographical feature Columbey Sugarloaf. The park is located approximately 23 kilometres north-east of Maitland. Nearby settlements include Clarence Town, Glen Oak, and Seaham. Maps 1 and 2 show the park location in a regional and state context.
Map 2. State Location Map
As well as the park, the area subject to this plan includes Eagleton Road which is vested in the Minister under Part 11 of the NPW Act, to ensure a continuation of access arrangements to neighbouring private land (refer to Map 1). The southern boundary of the park is located predominately on the northern side of the Clarence Town Road, with a smaller 30 hectare portion located on the southern side of the road. The western boundary of the park runs north to south, to the west of the Newcastle/Chichester Dam water pipeline, whilst the eastern boundary is largely marked by Stoney Creek. The northern boundary is marked by the combination of the Cemetery Road, and Wallaroo Creek.
2
The Stonequarry Hill portion is bounded on all four sides by private property and access is restricted as the main unnamed access track to Stonequarry Hill passes through private property and is gated. Surrounding land uses are predominantly agricultural and rural residential. Forests NSW retains the adjacent Uffington SF 178 for forestry purposes. Nearby parks and reserves are situated primarily to the south east. These include Wallaroo National Park, and Wallaroo State Forest. The remaining part of the original Uffington State Forest borders the park to the north. The park falls within the Worimi Local Aboriginal Land Council’s area of responsibility, and forms part of the Worimi Nation, of the Kattang language group. The park is located within Hunter Central Rivers Catchment Management Authority. The bulk of the park area is situated in the Dungog Local Government Area, with portions of the southern boundary bordering the Port Stephens Local Government Area. The Stonequarry Hill portion is within the Port Stephens Local Government Area.
2. MANAGEMENT CONTEXT 2.1 LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY FRAMEWORK The management of national parks in NSW is in the context of the legislative and policy framework, primarily the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NPW Act) the NPW Regulation 2002, the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (TSC Act), and the policies of the NPWS. Other legislation, international agreements and charters may also apply to management of the area. In particular, the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) may require the assessment and mitigation of the environmental impacts of works proposed in this plan. A plan of management is a statutory document under the NPW Act. Once the Minister has adopted a plan, no operations may be undertaken within the park except in accordance with this plan. This plan will also apply to any future additions to the park. Should management strategies or works be proposed for the park or any additions that are not consistent with this plan, an amendment to this plan or a new plan will be prepared and exhibited for public comment. 2.2 MANAGEMENT PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES National Parks are reserved under the NPW Act to protect and conserve areas containing outstanding or representative ecosystems, natural or cultural features or landscapes or phenomena that provide opportunities for public appreciation and inspiration and sustainable visitor use. Under the NPW Act (section 30E), National Parks are managed to:
• conserve biodiversity, maintain ecosystem functions, protect geological and geomorphological features and natural phenomena and maintain natural landscapes;
• conserve places, objects, features and landscapes of cultural value;
• protect the ecological integrity of one or more ecosystems for present and future generations;
• promote public appreciation and understanding of the park’s natural and cultural values;
3
• provide for sustainable visitor use and enjoyment that is compatible with conservation of natural and cultural values;
• provide for sustainable use (including adaptive reuse) of any buildings or structures or modified natural areas having regard to conservation of natural and cultural values; and
• provide for appropriate research and monitoring. 2.3 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Columbey National Park is considered to be of significance due to its biological values. Three vegetation communities, each of which Bell (2009) has described as an endangered ecological community (EEC) under the TSC Act, occur in the park. These are: 1) Lower Hunter Spotted Gum – Ironbark Forest, 2) Floodplain Redgum-Box Forest, and 3) Hunter Lowlands Redgum Forest. 2.4 SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT DIRECTIONS Management of the park will focus on the protection of the three EECs. Major strategies to achieve this objective are to:
• Implement the Regional Pest Management Strategy and focus on the pest plant control program;
• Provide appropriate day use recreational opportunities which complement visitor facilities in the local community; and
• Implement the Reserve Fire Management Strategy to protect life and property and maintain appropriate burn frequencies within ecological thresholds.
3. VALUES The location, landforms and plant and animal communities of an area have determined how it has been used and valued. Both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people place values on natural areas, including aesthetic, social, spiritual and recreational values. These values may be attached to the landscape as a whole or to individual components, for example to plant and animal species used by Aboriginal people. This plan of management aims to conserve both natural and cultural values. For reasons of clarity and document usefulness, various aspects of natural heritage, cultural heritage, threats and on-going use are dealt with individually, but their inter-relationships are recognised. 3.1 GEOLOGY, LANDSCAPE AND HYDROLOGY The park forms part of the NSW North Coast Bioregion. It spans a gently undulating landscape. The highest feature, Tower Hill is approximately 100 metres above sea level (ASL). The park features numerous drainage lines, all of which generally run to the south-east into the Williams River. The underlying geology of the majority of the park is derived from the Wallaringa Formation, described as pink to brown, thickly bedded, lithic sandstone, conglomerate and granitoids with minor sandstones. This is a Palaeozoic era formation, formed during the Carboniferous period (360-290 million years ago). The subsurface soils are primarily alluvium derived, and feature sand, silt, clays and minor gravels. These can be characterised as poorly fertile, well drained, and highly erosive soils.
4
The majority of the park is located within the Wallaroo Creek catchment, and drains into the lower arm of the Williams River. The smaller western Stonequarry Hill portion drains into the Tumbledown Creek catchment. Acid sulphate soils are identified in the lower branches of the Tumbledown and Wallaroo creeks. These soils are considered to have a low risk of becoming acidic (DLWC 1997). 3.2 NATIVE PLANTS The park features twelve vegetation communities which, for such a small park, represents significant diversity. These communities range from riparian rainforest on deep alluvial soils to drier open forests on hard setting clays (Bell 2009). Within the park, Bell identified 293 native plant species and three EECs which comprise 603 hectares of the total park area of 868 hectares. The three EECs are: Lower Hunter Spotted Gum – Ironbark Forest (475 hectares); Floodplain Redgum-Box Forest (124 hectares); and Hunter Lowlands Redgum Forest (3.68 hectares).
Lower Hunter Spotted Gum – Ironbark Forest is dominated by broad-leaved ironbark (Eucalyptus fibrosa), spotted gum (Corymbia maculata), broad-leaved white mahogany (Eucalyptus umbra) and in places grey box (Eucalyptus moluccana) can also be present. This community occupies the lower undulating slopes at low elevation, with typical understorey species including gorse bitter pea (Daviesia ulicifolia subsp. ulicifolia), native blackthorn (Bursaria spinosa), hairy bush-pea (Pultenaea villosa), wiry panic (Entolasia stricta), threeawn speargrass (Aristida vagans), Macrozamia flexuosa, and Lomandra confertifolia subsp. pallida. The co-dominance of Corymbia maculata and Eucalyptus fibrosa, often with Eucalyptus umbra, distinguish this community from all others (Bell 2009). Floodplain Redgum – Box Forest is restricted to major creeklines and their associated flood-outs. It can be dominated by cabbage gum (Eucalyptus amplifolia), grey ironbark (Eucalyptus siderophloia), forest red gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) or grey box (Eucalyptus moluccana). Examples dominated by each are present within the park. Rough-barked apple (Angophora floribunda) also occurs as a canopy dominant in limited areas. The often mono-specific stands of cabbage gum, grey box, rough-barked apple or grey ironbark characterise this community, and cannot be confused with any other vegetation type (Bell 2009). Hunter Lowlands Redgum Forest occurs at a single location in a previously cleared and grazed landscape, where it is dominated by forest red gum (Eucalyptus tereticornis) over a grassy ground layer of kangaroo grass (Themeda australis), Aristida warburgii, threeawn speargrass (Aristida vagans), and Ptilothrix deusta. Shrubs such as Acacia falcata, green wattle (Acacia irrorata), hairy bush-pea (Pultenaea villosa) and native blackthorn (Bursaria spinosa) are also present (Bell 2009). The remaining nine vegetation communities identified are gully rainforest, riparian rainforest, paperbark soak forest, Seaham mahogany forest, Seaham ironbark forest, Seaham spotted gum – ironbark forest, red ironbark scrub-forest, stringybark – apple forest, and plantation forest. One threatened plant species was previously recorded in the location of the park. Slaty red gum (Eucalyptus glaucina), listed as vulnerable under the TSC Act, had been recorded to the north of the Clarence Town Road. The record dated from the 1890s and was not exact as to the specific location (Lower North East CRA Survey Dataset 1997). Rare or threatened Australian plant (ROTAP) species include a population of the terrestrial orchid Pterostylis chaetophora, and many of the rare cycad Macrozamia flexuosa (Bell 2009). The previously
5
undescribed Clarence Town donkey orchid (Diuris sp aff alba (Clarence Town)) is also likely to occur in the park. 3.3 NATIVE ANIMALS Native mammal fauna observed in the park include the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus), swamp wallaby (Wallabia bicolor), eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus), red-necked wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus), and the eastern bent-wing bat (Miniopterus schreibersii). Amphibian fauna records for the park include Peron’s tree frog (Litoria peronii), broad-palmed frog (L. latopalmata), eastern dwarf tree frog (L. fallax), Lesueur’s frog (L. lesueuri), red-backed toadlet (Pseudophryne coriacea), common eastern froglet (Crinia signifera), and the ornate burrowing frog (Limnodynastes ornatus). Reptile fauna records include Jacky lizard (Amphibolurus muricatus), eastern water skink (Eulamprus quoyii), garden skink (Lampropholis delicata), and the three-toed skink (Saiphos equalis) (Lower North East CRA Survey Dataset 1997). Lace monitors (Varanus varius) have been observed in the park. Dingos (Canis lupis dingo) have also been observed. Of particular interest is the recording of the vulnerable brush-tailed phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa) by NPWS staff during recent fauna surveys (Parkinson & Fawcett, 2010). The park provides ideal habitat for the swift parrot (Lathamus discolor) and the regent honey eater (Zanthomiza phrygia), both of which are listed as endangered under the TSC Act. Other species of interest observed nearby, and which could potentially occur in the park include: the powerful owl (Ninox strenua), barking owl (Ninox connivens), grey-crowned babbler (Pomatostomus temporalis), gang-gang cockatoo (Callocephalon fimbriatum), glossy black cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami), spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus), green and golden bell frog (Litoria aurea), and the eastern free-tail bat (Mormopterus norfolkensis). 3.4 ABORIGINAL HERITAGE Aboriginal communities have an association and connection to the land. The land and water within a landscape are central to Aboriginal spirituality and contribute to Aboriginal identity. Aboriginal communities associate natural resources with the use and enjoyment of foods and medicines, caring for the land, passing on cultural knowledge, kinship systems and strengthening social bonds. Aboriginal heritage and connection to nature are inseparable from each other and need to be managed in an integrated manner across the landscape. The park is situated within the boundaries of the Worimi Local Aboriginal Land Council. The park is within an area that was part of the Worimi Nation, of the Kattang language Group (Brereton and Paulson 1998). Documentation of early local Aboriginal use and occupation of the local area is scant. There are no sites recorded within the park boundary, although formal investigation has yet to be undertaken. It is recognised that whilst there may be a paucity of physical sites, this does not suggest the area was not utilised by, or is not of interest to Aboriginal peoples. 3.5 HISTORIC HERITAGE The past history of the park is closely associated with the founding and development of Clarence Town, located two kilometres to the east. The township was once a thriving centre for shipping and industry in the Hunter region. The township was established as a processing and distribution point for fine cabinet and shipbuilding timbers, such as red cedar and white beech. Coupled with its location on a wide navigable section of the Williams River, it developed into a township by the 1820s. As a major shipping node and head of the river,
6
Clarence Town became an important centre for local industry (ship building, timber distribution, pubs, and factories). All goods destined for towns and districts as far north as Gloucester were transported from the township and carted (initially by bullock, and later horse and wagon) overland from there. The town’s importance gradually declined with the advent of rail transport by the late 1800’s (CTPS 1946). In spite of that decline, timber remained important to the local economy. By the 1930s locally sourced timber was used for the production of Masonite. The demand for timber for the production of Masonite resulted in widespread harvesting of timber. The mining industry also demanded considerable quantities of smaller timber, principally for pit props to the Hunter Valley coal mines (Forestry Commission NSW 1981). This created the current situation whereby the park is characterised by immature regrowth with limited evidence of a more mature structure. The Stonequarry Hill portion features a former quarry site that was one of the earliest industrial sites of the area. It is understood that the quarry was worked from about the 1860s to the early 1900s. Some material may also have been removed during the 1980s by the then Forestry Commission. A form of porphyritic sandstone quarried from the site was referred to as ‘Clarence Town Stone’ and was used in building works throughout the region, including the Clarence Town Police Station (1870), Seaham Church, Fort Scratchley (1885), local hotels (1880s), and for curbing and guttering in Newcastle during the 1880s (Hunter, 2010). Quarried material was extracted by the Forestry Commission up until the 1980s. 3.6 RECREATION, EDUCATION AND ACCESS The park provides an important recreational destination for the residents of Clarence Town, and other nearby urban areas. The park is popular for four wheel driving, horse riding, cycling and bushwalking. There is a history of trail bike riding, dating well back to when it was a State Forest. The labyrinthine network of trails throughout the park associated with its logging history is not sustainable in this small national park. Clarence Town Road is the main access road to the park. The park includes an extensive unsealed road network. The public access road network facilitates recreational opportunities and provides some park neighbours with access to their properties. Eagleton Road is a public access road managed by NPWS that provides access for a number of landowners to properties adjacent to the park’s north-western boundary. The park also includes a network of management trails that are primarily used for fire and other management purposes. Map 1 shows the public access road network, and recreational opportunities available in the park. Driving is permitted along Eagleton Road and Connection Trail (2WD standard) and the 4WD roads. Trail bike riding is permitted along public access roads, and by registered trail bikes only. Horse riding is permitted along the horse riding trails shown on Map 1. Bushwalking and cycling opportunities are permitted on the public access roads and management trails. The park is primarily a day use destination only and no recreational facilities are provided in the park. Recreational facilities will continue to be kept to a minimum with the provision of basic fixtures only (e.g. interpretative signage). Clarence Town is located in close proximity to the park and provides a range of accommodation opportunities. Given the parks proximity to Clarence Town, the day use nature of traditional park visitation and lack of suitable camp sites, camping opportunities will not be provided.
7
4. ISSUES 4.1 PEST SPECIES A preliminary roadside weed assessment was undertaken in 2007. A small number of introduced (exotic or non-endemic) plant species have been recorded as occurring throughout the park. Lantana (Lantana camara), listed as noxious, occurs in patches, mainly along some of the internal tracks and trails. Minor infestations occur on Tower Hill, and the tracks leading to that feature. In an open flat area in the north-eastern part of the park (known as ‘The Paddock’), at least two introduced species occur. A small number of monterey pine (Pinus radiata) were recorded. There was also a small patch of the succulent Aloe vera on the north western edge of the cleared area near Wallaroo Creek. Prickly pear (Oputina stricta) has been recorded in the park. A plantation of black cyprus pine (Callitrus endlicheri) of approximately half a hectare occurs on previously cleared land near Yard Trail. This species does not occur naturally in this area, and is believed to have been planted as a trial plantation. Similarly, a small population of bunya pine (Araucaria bidwillii) has been recorded west of Eagleton Road. Control measures are best focused on controlling the lantana, as there is potential for complete removal from the park given the low density of infestation. Other introduced plant species will be prioritised for control subject to: the likelihood of control success; noxious plant classification; and ease of control. Opportunistic observations of vertebrate pests suggest only a limited number of pest animals exist in the park. Wild dogs (Canis lupis familiaris) have been reported anecdotally by neighbours, and tracks have been observed in the park. Domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus) have also been observed. Proximity to local urban areas suggests other vertebrate pests such as cats (Felis catus) are likely. 4.2 FIRE The primary fire management objectives of the NPWS are to protect life, property and community assets from the adverse impacts of fire whilst managing fire regimes to maintain and protect biodiversity and cultural heritage. Fire is a natural feature of many environments and is essential for the survival of some plant communities. However, inappropriate fire regimes can lead to loss of particular plant and animal species and communities. High frequency fires have been listed as a key threatening process under the TSC Act, and can encourage the establishment and dispersal of introduced weed species. There has been one significant wildfire event recorded in the park. This occurred in December 1979 (Dungog Chronicle, 1979). The fire originated in the Mount Sugarloaf/Glen Oak area to the north-west of the park. The fire threatened Clarence Town and burnt out approximately 5,000 hectares of surrounding land. Backburn operations were conducted in the then Uffington State Forest by Forestry fire crews. There are a number of assets which border, or are close to the park, with the main ones being the Hunter Water pipeline beside Pipeline Trail and the township of Clarence Town with associated facilities.
8
The NPWS uses a zoning system for bushfire management in NPWS reserves. NPWS zones are compatible with the system adopted by the Bushfire Coordinating Committee for use in District Bushfire Management Committee (DBFMC) bushfire risk management plans. Trails shown on Map 1 have been assessed as necessary for fire management purposes. The majority of other tracks and trails not shown on Map 1 need to be assessed for their strategic value, and will either remain dormant (for possible activation for future fire fighting purposes) or will be closed and rehabilitated. A Reserve Fire Management Strategy has been prepared for the park (DECC 2009). The primary fire management objectives for the park are to protect life and property and prevent inappropriate fire regimes that may threaten the EECs, and any Slaty red gums present within the park. Portions of the park north of Clarence Town Road and west of Eagleton Road will be subject to prescriptive burns for the purpose of hazard reduction. Priority will be given to protecting adjacent properties from fire coming from the park. The portion of park south of the Clarence Town Road will not be subject to frequent burning. This portion will be used as a reference site to assess the impacts of reduced fire events on the white box/broad-leaved ironbark community. This portion has limited public access, is surrounded by grazing land, and poses a lesser fire risk than the primary portion. The Stonequarry Hill portion will also be subject to an infrequent burn regime, primarily due to the difficulty of access and the lack of natural or man made features with which to compartmentalise prescription burns. NPWS maintains cooperative arrangements with surrounding landowners and Rural Fire Service (RFS) brigades and is actively involved in the Lower Hunter Bush Fire Management Committee. Cooperative arrangements include approaches to fuel management, support for neighbours’ fire management efforts and information sharing. 4.3 ISOLATION AND FRAGMENTATION The surrounding Lower Hunter area has been extensively cleared, which has resulted in a high loss of biodiversity and fragmentation of habitat in the region. Long term conservation of biodiversity depends upon the protection, enhancement and connection of remaining habitat across the landscape, incorporating vegetation remnants on both public and private lands. Nearby vegetated areas contribute to the habitat values of the park and provide ecological corridors to other vegetated areas. Maintaining the integrity of the remaining habitat within the park and, where possible, linking this to adjacent areas of vegetation to facilitate wildlife corridors is important in ensuring long term viability of the park’s biological values. 4.4 INAPPROPRIATE ACTIVITIES Illegal dumping of household and commercial waste is a significant management issue threatening the values of the park. Material that has been dumped includes car bodies, garden waste, building materials, and general household garbage. Whilst the visual and scenic impacts of dumping are immediately obvious, other undesirable impacts are also associated with this activity. One example is the introduction of plant species from garden waste. It is believed the occurrence of the Aloe vera in the park originated from garden waste. Vehicle dumping is occasionally associated with the deliberate burning out of the vehicle. This creates a significant fire risk particularly in the warmer, drier months. The dumping is focused at park entrances and in the paddock area near Wallaroo Creek. Unrestricted vehicle access onto the various tracks and trails throughout the park has resulted in significant undesirable impacts to the trail network. These impacts include
9
providing ready access for dumping activities, damage to tracks and trails, soil erosion and compaction, and conflicting trail uses amongst visitor groups. Damage to tracks and trails from off road vehicles, such as trail bikes is readily observable at creek crossings and on a number of trails. Soil erosion occurs due to a combination of the thin highly erodable solodic soil type, and the interception of overland flow and subsequent channelling of run off down single wheel ruts, principally from trail bikes. There is evidence of off-road trail bike riding in the park. Off-road trail bike riding can cause loss of vegetation cover, soil compaction, erosion, and damage to park infrastructure.
5. REFERENCES Bell, S. (2009) Vegetation and floristics of Columbey National Park, Lower Hunter Valley, New South Wales. Unpublished report to NPWS. Brereton, S. and Paulson, R. (1998) Aboriginal Sites Investigation Gloucester Tops State Forests Gravel Quarry and NPWS Helipad Site. Report to NPWS by Forster Local Aboriginal Land Council. Byrne, Denis. (1992) Gloucester and Chichester Management Areas Environmental Impact Statement. Supporting Document No.8, An Investigation of the Aboriginal Archaeological Record of the Gloucester and Chichester EIS Areas. State Forests of NSW. Clarence Town Public School (CTPS) (1946) A Short History of Clarence Town. Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW (2009) Hunter Region Columbey National Park Fire Management Strategy (Type 2), DECC, Sydney, NSW. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/firemanagement/final/Columbey.pdf
Department of Land and Water Conservation (DLWC) 1997, Acid Sulphate Soil Maps Mapping Project, co-sponsored by Soil Conservation Service and the Natural Resources Council. Dungog Local Environment Plan 2006. Dungog Chronicle, December 5, 1979. Forestry Commission of NSW (1981) Management Plan for Wallaroo Management Area, Sydney. Hunter, C. (2010), History Off-cutts: Abandoned Quarry Stonequarry Hill Uffington State Forest Columbey National Park. Unpublished Report. Lower North East CRA Survey Dataset, NPWS 1997. NSW Scientific Committee (2005) Lower Hunter Spotted Gum Ironbark Forest in the Sydney Basin Bioregion - Endangered ecological community determination - final. DEC (NSW), Sydney. Parkinson, T. and Fawcett, A. (2010) Flora and Fauna establishment monitoring program. Unpublished internal NPWS report.
10
6. IM
PL
EM
EN
TA
TIO
N
Cu
rren
t S
itu
ati
on
D
esir
ed
Ou
tco
mes
Man
ag
em
en
t R
esp
on
se
P
rio
rity
*
6.1
On
-Park
Eco
log
ical C
on
serv
ati
on
T
he c
onserv
ation a
nd p
rote
ction o
f th
e t
hre
e T
SC
A
ct
liste
d veg
eta
tion com
munitie
s (E
EC
s)
is th
e
prim
ary
manag
em
ent
obje
ctive f
or
the p
ark
. T
he P
riorities A
ction S
tate
ment
and r
ecovery
pla
ns
conta
in
str
ate
gie
s
to
pro
mote
th
e
recovery
of
thre
ate
ned
specie
s,
popula
tions
and
ecolo
gic
al
com
munitie
s.
Soil
ero
sio
n o
ccurs
princip
ally
alo
ng
som
e o
f th
e
tracks and tr
ails
used exte
nsiv
ely
b
y tr
ail
bik
es.
Cro
ssin
g p
oin
ts a
t W
alla
roo C
reek,
and t
he t
rails
ru
nnin
g
dow
n
from
T
ow
er
Hill
are
part
icula
rly
aff
ecte
d.
All
native
pla
nt
and
anim
al
specie
s
and
com
munitie
s
are
conserv
ed.
Str
uctu
ral
div
ers
ity and
habitat
valu
es
are
re
sto
red
in
are
as
subje
ct to
past
logg
ing
. S
oil
ero
sio
n
is
min
imis
ed.
Wate
r q
ualit
y
and
health
of
the
park
’s
str
eam
s is im
pro
ved.
6.1
.1 M
onitor
veg
eta
tion re
covery
by m
appin
g veg
eta
tion
boundaries,
and assess exte
nt
of
endang
ere
d and oth
er
ecolo
gic
al com
munitie
s.
6.1
.2 I
mple
ment
rele
vant
str
ate
gie
s i
n t
he P
riorities A
ction
Sta
tem
ent
and
recovery
pla
ns
for
thre
ate
ned
specie
s,
popula
tions a
nd e
colo
gic
al com
munitie
s.
6.1
.3
Work
w
ith
neig
hbours
, veg
eta
tion
manag
em
ent
com
mitte
es a
nd local C
ouncils
to e
ncoura
ge c
onserv
ation o
f re
mnant
native v
eg
eta
tion in t
he v
icin
ity o
f th
e p
ark
. 6.1
.4 U
ndert
ake ro
ad w
ork
s in
a m
anner
that
min
imis
es
ero
sio
n a
nd w
ate
r pollu
tion,
and c
onstr
uct
rollo
vers
where
pra
ctical.
6.1
.5 C
lose a
ll non e
ssential
tracks a
nd i
nfo
rmal
trails
and
re
habili
tate
as r
eq
uired.
6.1
.6
Undert
ake
and
encoura
ge
researc
h
to
impro
ve
know
ledg
e a
nd m
anagem
ent of
natu
ral herita
ge.
Hig
h
Ong
oin
g
Ong
oin
g
Hig
h
Med
ium
M
ed
ium
11
Cu
rren
t S
itu
ati
on
D
esir
ed
Ou
tco
mes
Man
ag
em
en
t R
esp
on
se
P
rio
rity
*
6.2
C
ult
ura
l an
d H
isto
ric H
eri
tag
e
The
exis
ting
le
vel
of
know
ledg
e
about
the
Aborig
inal
cultura
l valu
es,
sig
nific
ance,
inte
rest, o
r use
of
the
park
is
poor.
M
ore
consultation
and
researc
h is r
eq
uired.
The h
isto
ry o
f th
e S
toneq
uarr
y H
ill p
ort
ion r
eq
uires
investig
ation t
o d
ete
rmin
e t
he level of
sig
nific
ance.
Aborig
inal
pla
ces
and
valu
es
are
id
entified
and p
rote
cte
d.
Aborig
inal
people
are
in
vo
lved
in
manag
em
ent
of
the
Aborig
inal
cultura
l valu
es o
f th
e p
ark
. H
isto
ric
featu
res
are
appro
priate
ly
conserv
ed
and
manag
ed.
Neg
ative
impacts
on
Aborig
inal
and
his
toric
herita
ge
valu
es
are
sta
ble
or
dim
inis
hin
g.
Unders
tandin
g
of
the
cultura
l valu
es
of
the
park
is im
pro
ved.
6.2
.1 C
onsult w
ith a
nd i
nvolv
e t
he W
orim
i Local
Aborig
inal
Land C
ouncil,
Eld
ers
gro
ups a
nd o
ther
rele
vant
Aborig
inal
com
munity
org
anis
ations
in
the
assessm
ent
of
cultura
l sig
nific
ance o
f th
e p
ark
. 6.2
.2 I
ncorp
ora
te t
he v
iew
s o
f th
e W
orim
i Local
Aborig
inal
Land C
ouncil,
Eld
ers
gro
ups a
nd o
ther
rele
vant
Aborig
inal
com
munity o
rganis
ations i
n t
he m
anag
em
ent
of
Aborig
inal
sites,
pla
ces a
nd v
alu
es, in
clu
din
g inte
rpre
tation o
f pla
ces o
r valu
es.
6.2
.3 A
ssess t
he c
ultura
l herita
ge v
alu
es o
f th
e p
ark
and
pre
pare
rele
vant m
anagem
ent str
ate
gie
s.
6.2
.4
Pre
cede
all
new
gro
und
dis
turb
ance
work
by
an
assessm
ent fo
r cultura
l fe
atu
res.
6.2
.5
Encoura
ge
furt
her
researc
h
into
th
e
Aborig
inal
herita
ge valu
es of
the p
ark
in
clo
se consultation w
ith th
e
Worim
i Local
Aborig
inal
Land C
ouncil,
Eld
ers
gro
ups a
nd
oth
er
rele
vant
Aborig
inal com
munity o
rganis
ations.
6.2
.6 E
ncoura
ge r
esearc
h i
nto
the h
isto
rical
sig
nific
ance o
f th
e a
rea.
In p
art
icula
r, m
onitor
the S
toneq
uarr
y H
ill p
ort
ion
and undert
ake arc
haeolo
gic
al
investig
ations of
the q
uarr
y
during
favoura
ble
conditio
ns e
.g.
during
dro
ught
or
follo
win
g
contr
olle
d b
urn
ing.
Med
ium
M
ed
ium
M
ed
ium
M
ed
ium
M
ed
ium
M
ed
ium
12
Cu
rren
t S
itu
ati
on
D
esir
ed
Ou
tco
mes
Man
ag
em
en
t R
esp
on
se
P
rio
rity
*
6.3
V
isit
or
Use a
nd
Serv
ices
Use o
f th
e p
ark
must
be c
are
fully
manag
ed s
ince it
is r
ela
tively
sm
all
and in
clu
des a
sig
nific
ant
are
a o
f re
mnant
veg
eta
tion,
conta
inin
g
endangere
d
ecolo
gic
al
com
munitie
s,
thre
ate
ned p
lant
specie
s,
as w
ell
as o
ther
import
ant
veg
eta
tion.
Access
to
the
park
is
im
port
ant
to
the
local
com
munity a
nd w
ill c
ontinue t
o b
e e
ncoura
ged a
s
a d
ay-u
se d
estination.
Vis
itor
facili
ties
will
be
min
imal
with
essential
infr
astr
uctu
re only
. T
he pro
vis
ion of
basic
vis
itor
park
ing
facili
ties
and
inte
rpre
tive
sig
nag
e
at
a
suitable
and r
eadily
accessib
le l
ocation (
eg.
alo
ng
Eag
leto
n R
oad)
will
be investig
ate
d.
The p
ark
is p
opula
r fo
r fo
ur
wheel
drivin
g,
hors
e
ridin
g, m
ounta
in b
ike r
idin
g,
and b
ushw
alk
ing.
The
com
bin
ation
of
trail
bik
ing,
cyclin
g,
hors
e
ridin
g,
and bushw
alk
ing in
a sm
all
park
has th
e
capacity
to
cre
ate
sig
nific
ant
user
conflic
t.
Tra
il bik
ing
g
enera
lly
is
a
freq
uent
sourc
e
of
conflic
t betw
een
div
ers
e
user
gro
ups.
Issues
such
as
nois
e,
trail
ero
sio
n,
unauth
orised
use
of
unre
gis
tere
d v
ehic
les,
and t
rail
safe
ty issues a
re o
f part
icula
r concern
. T
he la
byrinth
ine netw
ork
of
trails
th
roug
hout
the
park
associa
ted
with
its
his
tory
of
use
is
not
susta
inable
.
The l
ocal
com
munity i
s
aw
are
of
the
sig
nific
ance o
f th
e a
rea
and
of
manag
em
ent
pro
gra
ms.
Vis
itor
use
is
ecolo
gic
ally
susta
inable
. V
isitor
facili
ties
will
be
esta
blis
hed
to
the
min
imum
le
vel
necessary
. A
ll tr
ail
bik
e
ridin
g
outs
ide
public
access
roads c
eases.
All
dum
pin
g
activity
ceases.
6.3
.1 A
llow
public
vehic
le access on public
access ro
ads
show
n o
n M
ap 1
. A
llow
cyclin
g o
n t
he p
ublic
access r
oads
and m
anag
em
ent tr
ails
show
n o
n M
ap 1
. 6.3
.2
Lia
ise
with
the
rele
vant
auth
ority
in
re
lation
to
esta
blis
hin
g a
vehic
le s
peed l
imit f
or
public
access r
oads
show
n o
n M
ap 1
. 6.3
.3 A
llow
hors
e r
idin
g o
n r
oads a
nd m
anag
em
ent
trails
, show
n a
s h
ors
e r
idin
g tra
ils o
n M
ap 1
.
6.3
.4 P
rovid
e a
park
ing a
rea w
ith m
inim
al
vis
itor
facili
ties
(inclu
din
g inte
rpre
tative s
ignag
e)
at
the junction o
f E
ag
leto
n
Road and S
hort
cut
Tra
il (r
efe
r M
ap 1),
or
oth
er
suitable
lo
cation.
6.3
.5 P
rohib
it c
am
pin
g.
6.3
.6 M
onitor
levels
and im
pacts
of
vis
itor
use.
6.3
.7 C
lose a
ll in
form
al access p
oin
ts to v
ehic
les.
6.3
.8
Gate
/sig
npost
manag
em
ent
trails
to
re
str
ict
unauth
orised a
ccess.
6.3
.9 A
llow
re
gis
tere
d tr
ail
bik
e access on public
access
roads s
how
n o
n M
ap 1
. Im
ple
ment
str
ate
gie
s t
o p
revent
trail
bik
e r
idin
g e
lsew
here
.
Med
ium
M
ed
ium
M
ed
ium
H
igh
Ong
oin
g
Hig
h
Hig
h
Hig
h
Hig
h
13
Cu
rren
t S
itu
ati
on
D
esir
ed
Ou
tco
mes
Man
ag
em
en
t R
esp
on
se
P
rio
rity
*
Sto
neq
uarr
y H
ill i
s s
urr
ounded b
y p
rivate
pro
pert
y
wh
ich
limits
access
to
the
public
. T
here
is
one
manag
em
ent tr
ail
in this
section o
f th
e p
ark
. Ille
gal
dum
pin
g
occurs
at
a
num
ber
of
access
poin
ts.
6.4
W
eed
s a
nd
Pest
An
imals
A
pre
limin
ary
weed
asse
ssm
ent
was u
ndert
aken in
2007.
This
pro
vid
ed a
n o
verv
iew
of
weed s
pecie
s
pre
sent
on t
he p
ark
, le
vel
of
density,
and l
ocation
of
infe
sta
tions.
Opport
unis
tic o
bserv
ations i
ndic
ate
that
wild
do
gs
are
pre
sent
how
ever
the num
bers
are
unknow
n.
The p
roxim
ity t
o l
ocal
urb
an a
reas s
ugg
ests
oth
er
intr
oduced v
ert
ebra
te p
ests
such a
s c
ats
are
lik
ely
. A
sm
all
pla
nta
tion
of
native
pin
e
(Calli
tris
endlic
heri)
occurs
within
the p
ark
. Lanta
na B
iodiv
ers
ity M
onitoring
S
ites have been
esta
blis
hed b
y t
he N
PW
S.
The
impact
of
intr
oduced
specie
s
on
native
specie
s
and
neig
hbouring
la
nds
is
min
imis
ed.
The
impact
of
intr
oduced
specie
s
on
the p
ark
as a
whole
is
min
imis
ed.
The
pla
nta
tion
specie
s
are
re
moved
and
the
site
allo
wed
to
rehabili
tate
.
6.4
.1 M
anag
e in
troduced specie
s in
accord
ance w
ith th
e
Reg
ional
Pest
Manag
em
ent
Str
ate
gy.
Priority
will
be g
ive
n
to the c
ontr
ol of
Lanta
na c
am
ara
in the p
ark
. 6.4
.2 M
onitor
noxio
us a
nd s
ignific
ant
environm
enta
l w
eeds.
Tre
at any n
ew
outb
reaks w
here
possib
le.
6.4
.3 U
ndert
ake o
n-g
oin
g c
ontr
ol
pro
gra
ms f
or
Alo
e v
era
, C
alli
tris
endlic
heri,
Pin
us r
adia
ta,
and O
puntia s
tric
ta (
prickly
pear)
.
6.4
.4 P
rote
ct
Lanta
na B
iodiv
ers
ity M
onitoring
Sites f
rom
fire
that m
ay c
onflic
t w
ith r
esearc
h o
bje
ctives.
6.4
.5 Id
entify
lo
cations of
Lanta
na B
iodiv
ers
ity M
on
itoring
sites s
o a
s t
o e
nsure
local contr
ol pro
gra
ms d
o n
ot
inte
rfere
w
ith t
he m
onitoring
of th
ese s
ites.
Hig
h
Hig
h
Low
H
igh
Hig
h
14
6.5
F
ire M
an
ag
em
en
t F
ire i
s a
natu
ral
featu
re o
f m
any e
nvironm
ents
but
inappro
priate
fire
re
gim
es
can
lead
to
loss
of
part
icula
r pla
nt
and
anim
al
com
munitie
s.
Hig
h
freq
uency
fire
s
have
been
liste
d
as
a
key
thre
ate
nin
g p
rocess u
nder
the T
SC
Act.
A R
eserv
e F
ire M
anag
em
ent
Str
ate
gy has been
pre
pare
d f
or
the p
ark
. T
he p
ort
ion o
f th
e p
ark
situate
d o
n t
he s
outh
ern
sid
e o
f th
e C
lare
nce T
ow
n R
oad w
ill b
e u
sed a
s a
fire
m
anag
em
ent
refe
rence site,
and w
ill not
be
subje
ct to
fre
quent
burn
ing.
Eag
leto
n R
oad fo
rms an im
port
ant
and str
ate
gic
fire
m
anag
em
ent
access
trail
into
th
e
pa
rk.
Eag
leto
n
Road
and
Connecting
T
rail
serv
e
as
prim
ary
access
route
s
for
house
and
pro
pert
y pro
tection
to
adja
cent
pro
pert
ies
locate
d
on
the
nort
h-w
este
rn b
oundary
. S
toneq
uarr
y H
ill i
s s
urr
ounded b
y p
rivate
pro
pert
y
and
has
no
pra
ctical
boundary
conta
inm
ent
options.
Life,
pro
pert
y
and
natu
ral
and
cultura
l valu
es
are
pro
tecte
d
from
fire.
Fire
reg
imes
are
appro
priate
fo
r conserv
ation
of
native
pla
nt
and
anim
al
com
munitie
s.
Neg
ative im
pacts
of
fire
on natu
ral
and cultura
l herita
ge
valu
es
are
sta
ble
or
dim
inis
hin
g.
6.5
.1 I
mple
ment
the R
eserv
e F
ire M
anag
em
ent
Str
ate
gy f
or
the p
ark
. 6.5
.2
Part
icip
ate
in
th
e
Lo
wer
Hunte
r B
FM
C.
Ma
inta
in
coopera
tive a
rrang
em
ents
with l
ocal
RF
S b
rig
ades a
nd f
ire
contr
ol
off
icers
, F
ore
sts
N
SW
, H
unte
r W
ate
r C
orp
ora
tion
and s
urr
oundin
g l
andow
ners
in r
eg
ard
to f
uel
manag
em
ent
and f
ire s
uppre
ssio
n.
6.5
.3 S
uppre
ss a
ll unpla
nned f
ires in t
he p
ark
as q
uic
kly
as
possib
le.
6.5
.4 M
anag
e t
he p
ark
to p
rote
ct
bio
div
ers
ity in a
ccord
ance
with th
e id
entified fire
re
gim
es/thre
shold
s in
th
e R
eserv
e
Fire M
anag
em
ent
Str
ate
gy.
6.5
.5 T
he u
se o
f heavy m
achin
ery
off
tra
cks,
chem
icals
, etc
w
ill b
e a
void
ed.
6.5
.6 A
ssess t
he s
trate
gic
valu
e o
f dorm
ant
trails
not
show
n
in M
ap 1
and
activate
those t
rails
with s
trate
gic
valu
e f
or
fire
fig
hting p
urp
oses a
s r
equired.
6.5
.7 U
ndert
ake a
nd/o
r esta
blis
h s
trate
gic
fire m
anag
em
ent
work
s,
such as tr
itte
ring
and fire
bre
aks,
alo
ng
com
mon
boundaries as necessary
to
pro
tect
life,
pro
pert
y and th
e
environm
ent
where
appro
priate
.
Hig
h
Hig
h
Hig
h
Hig
h
Med
ium
M
ed
ium
H
igh
15
6.6
In
frastr
uctu
re a
nd
Main
ten
an
ce
Manag
em
ent
trails
to
be
reta
ined
and
oth
er
manag
em
ent fa
cili
ties a
re m
inim
al.
The
park
boundary
is
fe
nced
to
a
sto
ck-p
roof
sta
ndard
. H
unte
r W
ate
r pip
elin
es a
re l
ocate
d o
n t
he w
este
rn
and n
ort
hern
boundaries o
f th
e p
ark
. T
he l
ocation
of
the
underg
round
pip
elin
e
on
th
e
nort
hern
boundary
req
uires identification.
The p
ark
conta
ins t
wo q
uarr
ies, one in t
he
Sto
neq
uarr
y H
ill p
ort
ion, th
e s
econd n
ear
the
junction o
f T
ow
er
Hill
Tra
il and C
lare
nce T
ow
n
Road. T
he T
ow
er
Hill
Tra
il q
uarr
y c
an p
rovid
e
usefu
l m
ate
rial fo
r ro
ad m
ain
tenance,
whils
t th
e
Sto
neq
uarr
y H
ill q
uarr
y c
ould
supply
rock for
infr
astr
uctu
re w
ork
s.
Manag
em
ent
facili
ties
and
opera
tions
adeq
uate
ly
serv
e
manag
em
ent
needs
and
have
min
imal
impact.
Infr
astr
uctu
re
and
assets
are
ro
utinely
m
ain
tain
ed.
Exis
ting
non-p
ark
in
frastr
uctu
re
is
manag
ed
to
min
imis
e
impacts
on n
atu
ral
and
cultura
l valu
es.
6.6
.1 M
ain
tain
the r
oads a
nd m
anag
em
ent
trails
show
n o
n
Map 1
. 6.6
.2
Gate
/sig
npost
manag
em
ent
trails
to
re
str
ict
unauth
orised a
ccess.
6.6
.3 M
ain
tain
boundary
fences t
o e
xclu
de s
tock f
rom
the
park
. F
encin
g assis
tance m
ay be pro
vid
ed in
accord
ance
with N
PW
S p
olic
y.
6.6
.4
Investig
ate
th
e
tenure
of
all
non-N
PW
S
uses
and
ensure
th
at
licenses
or
easem
ents
are
g
rante
d
as
appro
priate
under
the N
PW
Act.
6.6
.5 I
nvestig
ate
the d
evelo
pm
ent
of
a q
uarr
y m
anag
em
ent
pla
n a
nd,
subje
ct
to a
ppro
priate
appro
vals
, use o
ne o
r both
q
uarr
ies t
o s
upply
mate
rial
for
essential
park
infr
astr
uctu
re
main
tenance,
such a
s r
oad g
ravel.
Med
ium
M
ed
ium
M
ed
ium
M
ed
ium
M
ed
ium
* H
igh
priority
activitie
s a
re those im
pera
tive t
o a
chie
vem
ent
of
the o
bje
ctives a
nd d
esired o
utc
om
es. T
hey m
ust be u
ndert
aken in t
he n
ear
futu
re to a
void
sig
nific
ant dete
riora
tion in n
atu
ral, c
ultura
l or
manag
em
ent re
sourc
es.
Med
ium
priority
activitie
s a
re t
hose that are
necessary
to a
chie
ve t
he o
bje
ctives a
nd d
esired o
utc
om
es b
ut
are
not urg
ent.
Lo
w p
riority
activitie
s a
re d
esirable
to a
chie
ve m
anag
em
ent obje
ctives a
nd d
esired o
utc
om
es b
ut can w
ait u
ntil re
sourc
es b
ecom
e a
vaila
ble
.
On
go
ing
is for
activitie
s that are
undert
aken o
n a
n a
nnual basis
or
sta
tem
ents
of m
anag
em
ent in
tent th
at w
ill d
irect th
e m
anag
em
ent re
sponse
if a
n issue t
hat
arises.