columbi some remarks on bandwidth in europe ton de liefde columbi on behalf of intug

24
Columbi Some Remarks on Bandwidth in Europe Ton de Liefde Columbi on behalf of INTUG

Upload: debra-coleen-benson

Post on 24-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Columbi

Some Remarks onBandwidth in Europe

Ton de Liefde

Columbi on behalf of INTUG

Columbi

INTUGgeneral

• International Telecommunications User Group– based in Brussels– full members: users associations– associated members: companies

• interfaces with EC, ITU, OECD

Columbi

INTUGorganisation

• Global coverage with regional organisations – i.a. INTUG Europe

Columbi

INTUGactivities

• Lobbygroup in Brussels• one of the topics: Leased line

availabilities and pricing• instrument ONP

– tariffs must be cost oriented

• Focus on business community

Columbi

INTUG Cost comparison studies

• comparison of list prices• comparison of prices paid

Columbi

Important because:

• Leased circuits are the asphalt of all telecommunications services including the Internet

Columbi

Just to remind

• In 1998 corporate data traffic will exceed voice(Arthur Anderson)

• By 2002, voice will be less than 1% of telecom traffic (Ebbers - Worldcom)

• Internet bandwidth is growing at 10% per month (Mergen - GTE)

• Required bandwidth will be 35 Tbit/s by 2002 (Newport Conference on Fiberoptics - Oct ‘97)

• 6 US ISPs will deploy ATM networks in 1998 (van der Berg - Project Oxygen)

Columbi

But is it possible in Europe?

• A 300km 2Mbit/s national circuit in Europe costs 4 times more than equivalent capacity in the US

• European 2Mbit/s cross-border tariffs are 17 times higher than within the US

• A 2 Mbit/s local circuit in Europe (not UK) costs 5 times the price in London”!

Columbi

It is just not reasonable

Columbi

Comparison of the cost of a 300km 2Mbit/s circuit in USA and Europe

USPrice=1

ECU 4100/month

ECU 6500/month

Some illustrations

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

USA Domestic EU Domestic (Average)

Columbi

Comparison of the cost of a 300km 2Mbit/s circuit in USA and Europe...after discounts

USPrice=1

ECU 1600/month

ECU 5900/month

Illustrations: USA vs Europe

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

USA Domestic EU Domestic (Average)

Columbi

0

5

10

15

20

25

USA Domestic (AT&T) EU Domestic (Average) EU Cross-Border (Average)

ECU 6500/month

ECU 34900/month

Comparison of the cost of a 300km 2Mbit/s circuit in USA and Europe

USPrice=1

ECU 4100/month

Illustrations: But it is even worse

Columbi

0

5

10

15

20

25

USA Domestic (AT&T) EU Domestic (Average) EU Cross-Border (Average)

ECU 6500/month

ECU 34900/month

Comparison of the cost of a 300km 2Mbit/s circuit in USA and Europe...after discounts

USPrice=1

ECU 1600/month

Illustrations: worse still

Columbi

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000U

SA

(45M

bit

/s)

Neth

'lan

ds

Sw

itz'

lnd

UK

(B

T)

Belg

ium

Luxem

b'g

Germ

an

y

Fra

nce

Local Circuit Cost of 5km 34 Mbit/s - ECU/month...after discounts

Source: National PTOs

1460

2730

7150

6520

5110

39203900

3160

Columbi

02468

1012141618

Ratio of the cost of 34Mbit/s: 2Mbit/s for a 5km local circuit (...after discounts)

Source: National PTOs

16.6

10.4

7.4

4.2

3.72.9

Columbi

A common market?

2 Mbit int. half circuit costs

05.000

10.00015.00020.00025.00030.00035.00040.000

010203040506070

cost

diff '96 '97

Source OPT committee

Columbi

What would one expect?

price level vs price reduction

0

10.000

20.000

30.000

40.000

0 20 40 60 80

price reduction '96- '97

ec

u/ h

alf

cir

cu

it

Columbi

Not this

price level vs price reduction

0

10.000

20.000

30.000

40.000

0 20 40 60 80

price reduction '96- '97

ec

u/ h

alf

cir

cu

it

Source OPT committee

Columbi

conclusion

• Not only a common pricing policy lacks

• There is not even a common direction

Columbi

Three tests

• Tests: – cost based pricing– uniform pricing approaches across Europe– bench-marking with the USA

• Europe fails all three tests!

Columbi

Some hope

• New brand of international operators– WorldCom, COLT, Hermes railtel,

Esprit

• and the old ones in disguise– Concert, Unisource, Global One

Columbi

Limitations

• Limited to main financial (and research) centres

• No need to price agressively as long as incumbants may charge high tariffs

Columbi

Conclusions

• Approach to harmonise by European directives and leaving the primary watchdog function to national authorities has failed or at best works to slow

• Competition alone will not bring prices down neither far enough nor fast enough

• This justifies action on a European level

Columbi

Summary

Without an European regulator, Europe will not be able to catch up with the US

ColumbiTon de LiefdeEngelandlaan 1722711 DW ZoetermeerThe [email protected]