comissioning the numi beam at fermilab with ion chamber arrays d. indurthy, r. keisler, s. kopp, s....

1
Comissioning the NuMI Beam at Fermilab with Ion Chamber Arrays D. Indurthy, R. Keisler, S. Kopp, S. Mendoza, M. Proga, Z. Pavlovich, R. Zwaska Department of Physics, University of Texas – Austin D. Harris, A. Marchionni, J. Morfin Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory M. Bishai, M. Diwan, B. Viren Brookhaven National Lab A. Erwin, H. Ping, C. Velissaris Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin – Madison D. Naples, D. Northacker, J. McDonald Dept. of Physics, University of Pittsburgh 4E7/cm 2 /spill 2E7/cm 2 /spill .5E7/cm 2 /spill Muon Monitors Plateau currents for 288 muon chambers •Each chamber mapped with 1Ci - source ( 241 Am, 30-60keV) •Press. & Temp calibration developed Ion Chamber Calibratio n •1% relative calibration Uncorrected Corrected ±1% Muon Monitors 3 stations at 740,750,770m Dolomite rocks screens lower energy particles, so subsequent alcoves see higher energy muons 9x9 array ceramic IC’s (3mm gap) Measures position & intensity of tertiary muon beam downstream of the absorber Signal connections Aluminum Wire Gasket HV connections Kapton Cables Chambers Tray 241 Am source •Monitors flushed with He gas Hadron Monitor •Measures intensity and position of the remnant hadrons from the primary proton beam •Max flux ~1E9/cm2/spill, ~2E9 Rad/yr 32” •7x7 IC array, 1mm electrode separation •Components Rad Tested up to 12GRad (6 NuMI years) Installed on a dual-rail support structure with remote-handling capability Beam Instrumentation Performance Studies Beam Based Target & Baffle Alignment Beam’s Eye View Graphite protection ‘baffle’ Graphite target Water cooling line target horn baffle Rail system allows variable positioning of the target w.r.t the horns focusing different energies •3 target positions: Low energy (LE), medium energy (ME), high energy (HE) Beam Intensity (E12 ppp) Center Pixel Signal (Arb) Center Pixel Signal (Arb) Mon Chamber HadMon Chamber Target Leak & Recovery •Leak discovered in mid-March •Resumed running in Apr. •Target scans used to diagnose water level in target Water level indicated by beam instrumentation after efforts to drain target in place, confirmed with boroscope Water leak in the cooling line Attenuatio n from water No water Target fully drained Water fills target Beam RMS spread from multiple scattering Vertical beam Position (mm) •In LE position, horns focus LE (4-6GeV) ’s only Vertical Target Scans Beam Monte Carlo of Vertical Target Scans Baffle Baffle Target Baffle Baffle Target Baffle Baffle Target Baffle Baffle Target Baffle Baffle Target Baffle Baffle Target Baffle Baffle Target Baffle Baffle Target Scans to align the target •Beam translated horizontally across the target/baffle •Measure integrated charge in the downstream monitors •Shape of Monitor Signal v. Beam Position on Target curve used to characterize target alignment •Peaks correspond to target apertures •Asymmetry.25mm target misalignment w.r.t. baffle •Target center @ 1.25mm beam-left, 1mm high (vertical scans not shown). Total Charge (Arb) Total Charge (Arb) Total Charge (Arb) Total Charge (Arb) Total Charge (Arb) Total Charge (Arb) Total Charge (Arb) Total Charge (Arb) LE Position LE Position LE Position LE Position HE Position HE Position HE Position HE Position Horn Studies No Water After effort to drain in place Water fills most of target Increased horn current increased numbers of focused pions In the LE position, horn-target positions are tuned to focus mainly lower energy ’s(4- 6GeV) Beam through the apertures produce deficits of muons @ the alcoves Beam on Baffle yields muons focused by horns Beam through the apertures more non-interacted protons @ the HM HE position more peaked Mon profiles All alcoves sensitive to horns with the HE beam 210m Mon Center Pixel Operating at 300V HadMon Center Pixel Operating at 190V No change in charge collection efficiency above 40V ppp On Target ppp On Target ppp On Target ppp On Target ppp On Target ppp On Target ppp On Target ppp On Target Increased intensity slower turnon Increasing Slope intermediate water level 2D projection s provide beam centroid alignment to better than 100rad off the target Hadron Monitor Muon Monitor Vertical Horizont al Horizon tal Vertica l In- Beam Profil es

Upload: jeffry-patrick

Post on 04-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comissioning the NuMI Beam at Fermilab with Ion Chamber Arrays D. Indurthy, R. Keisler, S. Kopp, S. Mendoza, M. Proga, Z. Pavlovich, R. Zwaska Department

Comissioning the NuMI Beam at Fermilab with Ion Chamber ArraysComissioning the NuMI Beam at Fermilab with Ion Chamber ArraysD. Indurthy, R. Keisler, S. Kopp, S. Mendoza, M. Proga, Z. Pavlovich, R. ZwaskaDepartment of Physics, University of Texas – Austin

D. Harris, A. Marchionni, J. MorfinFermi National Accelerator Laboratory

M. Bishai, M. Diwan, B. VirenBrookhaven National Lab

A. Erwin, H. Ping, C. VelissarisDepartment of Physics, University of Wisconsin – Madison

D. Naples, D. Northacker, J. McDonaldDept. of Physics, University of Pittsburgh

4E7/cm2/spill 2E7/cm2/spill .5E7/cm2/spill

Muon Monitors

Plateau currents for 288 muon chambers

•Each chamber mapped with 1Ci -source (241Am, 30-60keV)

•Press. & Temp calibration developed

Ion Chamber Calibration

•1% relative calibration

Uncorrected

Corrected

±1%

Muon Monitors3 stations at 740,750,770m

Dolomite rocks screens lower energy particles, so subsequent alcoves see higher energy muons

9x9 array ceramic IC’s (3mm gap)Measures position & intensity of tertiary muon beam downstream of the absorber

Signal connections

AluminumWire Gasket

HVconnections

Kapton Cables

ChambersTray241Am source

•Monitors flushed with He gas

Hadron Monitor•Measures intensity and position of the remnant hadrons from the primary proton beam•Max flux ~1E9/cm2/spill, ~2E9 Rad/yr

32”

•7x7 IC array, 1mm electrode separation•Components Rad Tested up to 12GRad (6 NuMI years)

Installed on a dual-rail support structure with remote-handling capability

Beam Instrumentation Performance Studies

Beam Based Target & Baffle Alignment

Beam’s Eye View

Graphite protection ‘baffle’

Graphite target

Water cooling line

target

hornbaffle

Rail system allows variable positioning of the target w.r.t the horns focusing different energies

•3 target positions: Low energy (LE), medium energy (ME), high energy (HE)

Beam Intensity (E12 ppp)

Cen

ter

Pix

el S

ign

al (

Arb

)C

ente

r P

ixel

Sig

nal

(A

rb)

Mon Chamber

HadMon Chamber

Target Leak & Recovery•Leak discovered in mid-March

•Resumed running in Apr.

•Target scans used to diagnose water level in target

Water level indicated by beam instrumentation after efforts to drain target in place, confirmed with boroscope

Water leak in the cooling line

Attenuation from water

No water

Target fully drained

Water fills target

Beam RMS spread from multiple scattering

Vertical beam Position (mm)

•In LE position, horns focus LE (4-6GeV) ’s only

Vertical Target Scans

Beam Monte Carlo of Vertical Target Scans

Baffle BaffleTarget

Baffle Baffle

Target

Baffle BaffleTarget

Baffle BaffleTarget

Baffle BaffleTarget

Baffle BaffleTarget

Baffle BaffleTarget

Baffle BaffleTarget

Scans to align the target

•Beam translated horizontally across the target/baffle

•Measure integrated charge in the downstream monitors

•Shape of Monitor Signal v. Beam Position on Target curve used to characterize target alignment

•Peaks correspond to target apertures

•Asymmetry.25mm target misalignment w.r.t. baffle

•Target center @ 1.25mm beam-left, 1mm high (vertical scans not shown).

Tot

al C

harg

e (A

rb)

Tot

al C

harg

e (

Arb

)T

otal

Cha

rge

(A

rb)

Tot

al C

harg

e (

Arb

)

Tot

al C

harg

e (

Arb

)T

otal

Cha

rge

(A

rb)

Tot

al C

harg

e (

Arb

)T

otal

Cha

rge

(A

rb)

LE Position

LE Position

LE Position

LE Position

HE Position

HE Position

HE Position

HE Position

Horn Studies

No Water

After effort to drain in place

Water fills most of target

Increased horn current increased numbers of focused pions

In the LE position, horn-target positions are tuned to focus mainly lower energy ’s(4-6GeV)

Beam through the apertures produce deficits of muons @ the alcoves

Beam on Baffle yields muons focused by horns

Beam through the apertures more non-interacted protons @ the HM

HE position more peaked Mon profiles

All alcoves sensitive to horns with the HE beam

210m

Mon Center Pixel

Operating at 300V

HadMon Center Pixel

Operating at 190V

No change in charge collection efficiency above 40V

ppp On Targetppp On Targetppp On Target

ppp On Target

ppp On Target

ppp On Target

ppp On Target

ppp On Target

Increased intensity slower turnon

Increasing Slope intermediate water level

2D projections provide beam centroid alignment to better than 100rad off the target

Hadron Monitor

Muon Monitor

Vertical

Horizontal

Horizontal

Vertical

In-Beam Profiles