comments on the groundwinds nh 2000 intercomparison campaign

18
Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign James G. Yoe M.K. Rama Varma Raja

Upload: olinda

Post on 13-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign. James G. Yoe M.K. Rama Varma Raja. Core Questions. Are the DWL’s LOSH measurements consistent with the (accepted) wind? Did the optical instruments provide LOSH wind measurements in agreement with one another? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison

Campaign

James G. Yoe

M.K. Rama Varma Raja

Page 2: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Core Questions

• Are the DWL’s LOSH measurements consistent with the (accepted) wind?

• Did the optical instruments provide LOSH wind measurements in agreement with one another?

• Answer: yes – signal permitting

Page 3: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Approach to addressing

• Examination of “best” dataset– Use most extensive set of observations– Stationary atmospheric conditions prevailing

• Departures recognizable

– Data processing/products considered optimal – 09/28/00

Page 4: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Profiles of radiosonde wind speed & direction on 28/29 September 2000.

Page 5: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Initially clear conditions give way to a thick, descending cloud layer near 5 km between 0000 - 0300 UT on 09/29/00. (GLOW total photon counts display similar structure.)

Page 6: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Time-height section of mini-MOPA SNR 09/28/00 - 09/29/00. The cloud layer visible as enhanced SNR at 4-6 km.

Page 7: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Time-Height section of GroundWinds (molecular) 1-min LOSH velocities.

Page 8: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Time-height section of uncertainty reported for 1-min radial velocity for GroundWinds (molecular channel.)

Page 9: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Time-height section of GLOW 1-min LOSH velocities.

Page 10: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Mean Difference= -1.51 m/s

SD of MD = 5.18 m/s

Size= 198

Mean Difference = -1.84 m/sSD of MD = 4.66 m/sSize= 132

Page 11: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Mean Difference =1.0 m/sSD of MD = 4.67 m/sSize= 78

Mean Difference= -2.51 m/sSD = 5.58 m/sSize= 78

Page 12: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Mean Difference =2.41 m/sSD of MD = 2.83 m/sSize= 140

Mean Difference =0.23 m/sSD of MD = 2.24 m/sSize=140

Page 13: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Mean Difference = -2.78 m/sSD of MD =2.04 m/sSize=166

Mean Difference =1.63 m/sSD of MD = 2.70 m/sSize= 169

Mean Diff. =-1.25 m/sSD of MD =3.04 m/sSize=193

Page 14: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Mean=-1.07 m/sSD=2.55 m/sSize=567

Mean=-1.17 m/sSD=2.67 m/sSize=762

Page 15: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Mean Difference =-0.7 m/s

SD of MD =5.57 m/s

Size=361

Mean Difference=-3.76 m/sSD of MD =8.19 m/sSize =114 (120)

Page 16: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

The horizontal separation of radiosondes and Doppler Wind Lidar sampling volumes as functions of height.

Page 17: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Profiles of radiosonde relative humidity & temperature on 09/28/00 and 09/29/00. Note descending, thickening cloud layer

Page 18: Comments on the GroundWinds NH 2000 Intercomparison Campaign

Mean=0.07 m/sSD=5.42 m/sSize=247