committee of adjustment results - escribe meetings

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT

RESULTS

Location: VIRTUAL HEARING Hearing: September 17, 2020 AT 1:00 P.M.

K:\ctyclerk\COMMADJ\GROUP\CD Community Development\02-Decision working folder\Sept 17\Disposition20-09-17-Sep-100.doc; 2020/09/21; 11:42:41 AM Page: 1 of 1

File Name of Applicant Location of Land Ward Decision

| AA = Approved as Amended | ACP= Condition Plan | AC= Approved on Condition | AT = Approved Temporarily | D = Deferred | AIP=Approved in Part

NEW APPLICATIONS (MINOR VARIANCE) A-175/20 SOBHA & RAJENDRA GURUNG 460 KROTONE CRES 11 Approved

A-271/20 MAPLE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORP INC 3111 & 3123 CAWTHRA RD

3 Approved

A-274/20 KEVIN HUETHER 1438 HAIG BLVD 1 Approved (AA, AC)

A-283/20 2744920 ONTARIO INC 2447 ANSON DR 5 Approved (AA, ACP)

A-284/20 AYYAZ KHAN & SAIMA ASLAM 1447 SANTA ROSA CRT 6 Approved

A-286/20 NARGIS & AYAZ LADAK 5121 NESTLING GROV 10 Approved (AA, AC)

A-288/20 MACIEJ & AGNIESZKA CZAPLINSKI 1490 ROGERSWOOD CRT

2 Approved (AA)

A-289/20 MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY 5533 MEADOWCREST AVE

10 Approved (AA)

A-290/20 ARTA MARA 6486 CHAUMONT CRES 9 Deferred

A-291/20 SEAN & VINAYA MATHEWS 5955 LEESIDE CRES 9 Approved (ACP)

A-292/20 2221433 ONTARIO LTD 885 CENTRAL PKY W 6 Approved (AC)

A-293/20 THE INCORPORATED SYNOD OF THE DIOCESE OF TORONTO

1513 DIXIE RD 1 Approved (AC)

A-295/20 ALEXANDRE ROCHA & HELEN FILIPE 1305 CERMEL DR 2 Approved

DEFERRED APPLICATIONS (MINOR VARIANCE) A-4/19 DAVID & LISA CABEL 1341 STAVEBANK RD 1 Approved

File: “A” 175/20 WARD 11

Page 1 of 2

Decision of the Mississauga Committee of Adjustment under

Section 45(1) OR (2) of The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended. Application for the property located at 460 Krotone Crescent.

Date of Hearing on Thursday September 17, 2020 Date Decision Signed by the Committee September 24, 2020

The hearing commenced at approximately 1:00p.m.

No Member declared a pecuniary interest for this application. The subject application was heard at approximately 1:10p.m. APPLICATION DETAILS The applicants request the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow the construction of a window well on the subject property proposing a side yard of 0.21m (approx. 0.69ft) measured to the window well whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum side yard of 0.59m (approx. 1.94ft) measured to the window well in this instance. R. Rai, agent, attended and presented evidence and comment in support of the application. COMMENTS The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:

• City of Mississauga, Planning and Building Department (dated September 14, 2020) • City of Mississauga, Transportation and Works Department (dated September 14, 2020) • Region of Peel (dated September 14, 2020)

CORRESPONDENCE & DISCUSSION No public comments were received as a result of the public circulation of this application. Committee asked questions of the agent who appeared before the Committee. DECISION Committee has taken into consideration all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, and the majority of the members have determined that the application is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development on the subject property, and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan are maintained.

File: “A” 175/20 WARD 11

Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request. MOVED BY: W. Shahrukh CARRIED The Decision of the Committee is: APPLICATION APPROVED: To allow the construction of a window well on the subject property proposing a side yard of 0.21m measured to the window well whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum side yard of 0.59m measured to the window well in this instance. Committee Decision dated at the City of Mississauga on September 24, 2020. “S. PATRIZIO” S. PATRIZIO (CHAIR)

“D. GEORGE” D. GEORGE

“W. SHAHRUKH” W. SHAHRUKH

“D. KENNEDY” D. KENNEDY

“J. PAGE” J. PAGE

“J. KWAST” J. KWAST

“D. COOK” D. COOK

I certify this is copy of the decision of the Committee’s decision given on September 24, 2020

“S. KENNEY” For a signed copy of this document

SEAN KENNEY - SECRETARY-TREASURER

please call 905-615-3200 ext. 2408 or

email [email protected] A copy of Section 45 of the Planning Act, as amended, is attached. This decision is subject to appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal by filing with the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment a written notification, giving reasons for the appeal, accompanied with the prescribed fee on or before October 14, 2020. NOTES: 1. A Development Charge may be payable prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Further approvals from the City of Mississauga may be required i.e. a Building Permit, a Zoning Certificate,

a License, etc.

mailto:[email protected]

File: “A” 271/20 WARD 3

Page 1 of 4


Section 45(1) OR (2) of The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended. Application for the property located at 3111 & 3123 Cawthra Road.



No Member declared a pecuniary interest for this application. The subject application was heard at approximately 1:02p.m. APPLICATION DETAILS The applicant requests the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow the construction of townhouses proposing: 1. A setback measured to Townhouse F of 1.50m (approx. 4.92ft) whereas By-law as amended,

requires a minimum setback measured to townhouse F of 1.80m (approx. 5.91ft) in this instance;

2. A setback measured to Block 4 of 2.50m (approx. 8.20ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum setback measured to Block 4 of 2.60m (approx. 8.53ft) in this instance;

3. A setback measured to the corner of Block 4 of 1.40m (approx. 4.60ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum setback measured to the corner of Block 4 of 1.60m (approx. 5.24ft) in this instance;

4. A setback measured to the retaining wall abutting Block 8 of 1.50m (approx. 4.92ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum setback measured to the retaining wall abutting Block 8 of 2.40m (approx. 7.87ft) in this instance;

5. A setback measured from a front wall of a stacked townhouse to a condominium road of 2.40m (approx.7.87 ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum setback measured from a front wall of a stacked townhouse to a condominium road of 2.50m (approx. 8.20ft) in this instance; and

6. A setback measured from a front wall of a townhouse dwelling to a condominium road of 2.30m (approx. 7.54ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007 as amended, requires a minimum setback measured from a front wall of a townhouse dwelling to a condominium road of 2.50m (approx. 8.20ft) in this instance.

S. Clark, agent, attended and presented evidence and comment in support of the application. COMMENTS The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:

• City of Mississauga, Planning and Building Department (dated September 14, 2020) • Region of Peel (dated September 14, 2020)

File: “A” 271/20 WARD 3

Page 2 of 4


File: “A” 271/20 WARD 3

Page 3 of 4

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request. MOVED BY: J. Page CARRIED The Decision of the Committee is: APPLICATION APPROVED: to allow the construction of townhouses proposing: 1. A setback measured to Townhouse F of 1.50m whereas By-law as amended, requires a

minimum setback measured to townhouse F of 1.80m in this instance; 2. A setback measured to Block 4 of 2.50m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a

minimum setback measured to Block 4 of 2.60m in this instance; 3. A setback measured to the corner of Block 4 of 1.40m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as

amended, requires a minimum setback measured to the corner of Block 4 of 1.60m in this instance;

4. A setback measured to the retaining wall abutting Block 8 of 1.50m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum setback measured to the retaining wall abutting Block 8 of 2.40m in this instance;

5. A setback measured from a front wall of a stacked townhouse to a condominium road of 2.40m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum setback measured from a front wall of a stacked townhouse to a condominium road of 2.50m in this instance; and

6. A setback measured from a front wall of a townhouse dwelling to a condominium road of 2.30m whereas By-law 0225-2007 as amended, requires a minimum setback measured from a front wall of a townhouse dwelling to a condominium road of 2.50m in this instance.

Committee Decision dated at the City of Mississauga on September 24, 2020. “S. PATRIZIO” S. PATRIZIO (CHAIR)











email [email protected] A copy of Section 45 of the Planning Act, as amended, is attached.


File: “A” 271/20 WARD 3

Page 4 of 4

This decision is subject to appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal by filing with the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment a written notification, giving reasons for the appeal, accompanied with the prescribed fee on or before October 14, 2020. NOTES: 1. A Development Charge may be payable prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Further approvals from the City of Mississauga may be required i.e. a Building Permit, a Zoning Certificate,

a License, etc.

File: “A” 274/20 WARD 1

Page 1 of 3


Section 45(1) OR (2) of The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended. Application for the property located at 1438 Haig Boulevard.



No Member declared a pecuniary interest for this application. The subject application was heard at approximately 1:07p.m. APPLICATION DETAILS The applicant requests the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow the construction of an addition and accessory structures on the subject property proposing: 1. A dwelling unit depth of 42.56m (approx. 139.63ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007 as amended,

permits a maximum dwelling unit depth of 20.00m (approx. 65.62ft) in this instance; 2. A below grade garage area of 147.46sq.m (approx. 1587.24sq.ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007 as

amended, permits a maximum below grade garage area of 75.00sq.m (approx. 807.30sq.ft) in this instance;

3. A building height for the second storey addition (rear) of 7.70m (approx. 25.26 ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007 as amended, permits a maximum building height for the second storey addition of 7.50m (approx. 24.61ft) in this instance; and

4. A combined area of accessory structures and buildings of 61.96sq.m (approx. 666.93sq.f) whereas By-law 0225-2007 as amended, permits a maximum combined area of accessory structures and building of 60.00sq.m (approx. 645.83sq.ft) in this instance.

J. Formosa, agent, attended and presented evidence and comment in support of the application. COMMENTS The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:


CORRESPONDENCE & DISCUSSION The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:

• A petition of support signed by 8 area resident. L. Petricca, Planning and Building, spoke to the committee and expressed that Planning Staff would no longer be in objection with the dwelling depth variance being that the applicant is not building a second storey above the addition.

File: “A” 274/20 WARD 1

Page 2 of 3

Committee asked questions of the agent who appeared before the Committee. DECISION The applicant requested that the application be amended and Committee agreed to the request. Committee has taken into consideration, on balance, any and all submissions made before its decision including one petition. They have also considered all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, and the majority of the members have determined that the application is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development on the subject property, and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan are maintained.

File: “A” 274/20 WARD 1

Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request. MOVED BY: D. George CARRIED The Decision of the Committee is: APPLICATION APPROVED AS AMENDED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS: To allow the construction of an addition and accessory structures on the subject property proposing: 1. A dwelling unit depth of 42.56m whereas By-law 0225-2007 as amended, permits a maximum

dwelling unit depth of 20.00m in this instance; 2. An area of 147.46sq.m for the below grade garage; whereas By-law 0225-2007 as amended,

permits a maximum area of 75.00sq.m for a garage in this instance; 3. An area occupied combined for all accessory buildings and structures of 61.96sq.m; whereas

By-law 0225-2007 as amended, permits a maximum area occupied combined for all accessory buildings and structures of 60.00sq.m in this instance.

CONDITION(S): 1. The addition at the rear of the property shall be one storey. Committee Decision dated at the City of Mississauga on September 24, 2020. “S. PATRIZIO” S. PATRIZIO (CHAIR)












a License, etc.


File: “A” 283/20 WARD 5

Page 1 of 2


Section 45(1) OR (2) of The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended. Application for the property located at 2447 Anson Drive.



No Member declared a pecuniary interest for this application. The subject application was heard at approximately 1:11p.m. APPLICATION DETAILS The applicant requests the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow a new tenant on the subject property, proposing: 1. 19 parking spaces; whereas, By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum of 34

parking spaces, in this instance; 2. Accessible parking spaces in the rear; whereas, By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires

accessible parking in the front, in this instance; and, 3. An aisle width of 4.50m (approx. 14.76ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a

minimum aisle width of 7.00m (approx. 22.97ft) in this instance. B. Goldman, agent, attended and presented evidence and comment in support of the application. COMMENTS The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:


CORRESPONDENCE & DISCUSSION No public comments were received as a result of the public circulation of this application. Committee asked questions of the agent who appeared before the Committee. DECISION The applicant requested that the application be amended and Committee agreed to the request. Committee has taken into consideration all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, and the majority of the members have determined that the application is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development on the subject property, and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan are maintained.

File: “A” 283/20 WARD 5

Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request. MOVED BY: J. Page CARRIED The Decision of the Committee is: APPLICATION APPROVED AS AMENDED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS: The Applicant requests the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow a new tenant on the subject property, proposing: 1. 18 parking spaces; whereas, By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum of 34

parking spaces, in this instance; 2. Accessible parking spaces in the rear; whereas, By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires

accessible parking in the front, in this instance; and, 3. An aisle width of 4.50m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum aisle

width of 7.00m in this instance. CONDITION(S): 1. Construction related to this variance shall be in general conformance with the site plan

approved by the Committee. Committee Decision dated at the City of Mississauga on September 24, 2020. “S. PATRIZIO” S. PATRIZIO (CHAIR)












a License, etc.


81 765432

EX

IST

ING

WA

LK

WA

Y

1 STOREY MASONRY BUILDING2447 ANSON DRIVE

(UNIT 1: AREA OF WORK)

1 STOREY MASONRY BUILDING2447 ANSON DRIVE

(UNIT 2)

1

LOADING SPACE1

301' - 4 1/4" (91.85M)

118' - 4

1/2

" (36.0

8M

)

88' - 0

" (26.8

2M

)

44' - 0

" (13.4

1M

)4

4' - 0

" (13.4

1M

)

190' - 4 1/2" (58.03M)35' - 2 3/4" (10.74M) 75' - 9" (23.09M)

15' - 0

" (4.5

7M

)1

5' - 4

1/2

" (4.6

8M

)

EXISTING DRIVEWAY

EXISTING DRIVEWAY

SITE PLAN BASED ON PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED DRAWINGS DRAWN BY COOPER CONSULTANTS LIMITED DATED FEBRUARY 14TH 1989 AND FIELD MEASUREMENTS

NO CHANGES TO COVERAGE AND EXISTING HARD AND SOFT LANDSCAPING FROM PREVIOUS PERMIT.

EXISTING SITE STATISTICS

LOT AREA: 35672.80 SF (3314.11 M2)UNIT 1 GFA: 8400 SF (780.39 M2)UNIT 2 GFA: 8400 SF (780.39 M2)TOTAL GFA: 16800 SF (1560.78 M2)COVERAGE: 47.09% OF LOT AREAEX. PARKING: 18 SPACESSOFTSCAPING: 1710.26 SF (158.88 M2)HARDSCAPING: 17244.54 SF (1602.07 M2)

AN

SO

N D

RIV

E

RENOVATION

LEGEND

SOFT LANDSCAPING

9

AREA OF WORK

PARKING CALCULATIONS

UNIT 1 USE: SCIENCE & TECH.PARKING RATE: 3.2 / 100M2

PARKING REQUIRED: 25 SPACESUNIT 2 USE: WAREHOUSEPARKING RATE: 1.1 / 100M2

PARKING REQUIRED: 9 SPACESTOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 34 SPACESTOTAL PARKING PROPOSED: 18 SPACES

11

' - 5 3

/4" (3

.50M

)

29' - 6 1/4" (9.00M)

LOADING SPACE2

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

11' - 2" (3.40M)

15

' - 4 1

/2" (4

.69M

)

29' - 2" (8.89M)

11' - 2

" (3.4

0M

)

4' - 1

1" (1

.50

M)

6 (A - TYPE A)8

' - 5 1

/2" (2

.58M

)

17' - 0 3/4" (5.20M)

8' - 6

1/4

" (2.6

0M

)

17

' - 0 3

/4" (5

.20M

)

3 4 5

2 (A

-T

YP

E A

)5' - 11" (1.80M)

7

11' - 2

" (3.4

0M

)

DRAWING NO.:

CHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

JOB NO.:

SCALE:

DATE:

Plans prepared by:

BARRY GOLDMAN ARCHITECT321 Carlaw Ave, Suite 203

Toronto Ont.

M4M 2S1

Tel 647-346-9105

[email protected]

GENERAL NOTES:

1. Do not scale drawings.2. Confirm all existing site conditions anddimensions. Report any discrepancies to the Architect immediately. 3. All work is to be carried out according to the current editions of the relevant Building Code and By-Laws.4. All existing surfaces and structures adjacent to the proposed work are to be protected during demolition and construction.5. Contractor is responsible for all required Mechanical and Electrical approvals and permits Mechanical Contractor to confirm vent and rad locations, and heating / cooling coverage for the proposed work, unless otherwise notes. 6. These drawings must not be duplicated in any form, or used for any other project, without the written concent of the Architect.

3/32" = 1'-0"

B.G.

C.N.

1211

Sept. 14th 2020

Permit

2447 Anson Drive (Unit 1), Mississauga

Site Plan

A1

No. Date Description

1 04/13/2020 Issued for Co-ordination

2 04/23/2020 Reissued for Co-ordination

4 05/06/2020 Issued for Permit

5 05/27/2020 Reissued for Zoning

6 06/09/2020 Reissued for Zoning

7 09/14/2020 Reissued for Committee

aledavi

Revised

File: “A” 284/20 WARD 6

Page 1 of 2


Section 45(1) OR (2) of The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended. Application for the property located at 1447 Santa Rosa Court.



No Member declared a pecuniary interest for this application. The subject application was heard at approximately 1:17p.m. APPLICATION DETAILS The applicants request the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow the existing below grade entrance to remain proposing a side yard of 0.91m (approx. 2.99ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum side yard of 1.20m (approx. 3.94ft) in this instance. R. Singh, agent, attended and presented evidence and comment in support of the application. COMMENTS The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:



File: “A” 284/20 WARD 6

Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request. MOVED BY: J. Kwast CARRIED The Decision of the Committee is: APPLICATION APPROVED: To allow the existing below grade entrance to remain proposing a side yard of 0.91m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum side yard of 1.20m in this instance. Committee Decision dated at the City of Mississauga on September 24, 2020. “S. PATRIZIO” S. PATRIZIO (CHAIR)












a License, etc.


File: “A” 286/20 WARD 10

Page 1 of 2


Section 45(1) OR (2) of The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended. Application for the property located at 5121 Nestling Grove.



No Member declared a pecuniary interest for this application. The subject application was heard at approximately 1:20p.m. APPLICATION DETAILS The applicants request the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow 0 parking spaces for a basement apartment; whereas, By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum of 1 parking space for a basement apartment, in this instance. R. Singh, agent, attended and presented evidence and comment in support of the application. COMMENTS The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:



File: “A” 286/20 WARD 10

Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request. MOVED BY: J. Page CARRIED The Decision of the Committee is: APPLICATION APPROVED AS AMENDED: A total of 2 parking spaces for the dwelling and second dwelling unit; whereas, By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a total of 3 parking spaces, in this instance. Committee Decision dated at the City of Mississauga on September 24, 2020. “S. PATRIZIO” S. PATRIZIO (CHAIR)












a License, etc.


File: “A” 288/20 WARD 2

Page 1 of 3


Section 45(1) OR (2) of The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended. Application for the property located at 1490 Rogerswood Court.



No Member declared a pecuniary interest for this application. The subject application was heard at approximately 1:26p.m. APPLICATION DETAILS The applicant requests the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow a gazebo and shed proposing: 1. A lot coverage of 30.87% (467.43sq.m) whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, permits a

maximum lot coverage of 30.00% (454.11sq.m) in this instance; 2. An occupied area of a shed of 24.34sq.m (approx. 261.99sq.ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007, as

amended, permits a maximum occupied area of a shed of 20.00sq.m (approx. 215.28ft) in this instance;

3. A setback measured from a shed to a side lot line of 0.61m (approx. 2.00ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum setback measured from a shed to a side lot line of 1.20m (approx. 3.94ft) in this instance;

4. An occupied area of a gazebo of 32.70sq.m (approx. 351.98ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, permits a maximum occupied area of a gazebo of 20.00sq.m (approx. 215.28ft) in this instance; and

5. A height of a gazebo of 3.20m (approx. 10.50ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, permits a maximum building height of a gazebo of 3.00m (approx. 9.84ft) in this instance.

M. Czaplinski, owner, attended and presented evidence and comment in support of the application. COMMENTS The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:


CORRESPONDENCE & DISCUSSION No public comments were received as a result of the public circulation of this application. Committee asked questions of the agent who appeared before the Committee.

File: “A” 288/20 WARD 2

Page 2 of 3

DECISION The applicant requested that the application be amended and Committee agreed to the request. Committee has taken into consideration all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, and the majority of the members have determined that the application is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development on the subject property, and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan are maintained.

File: “A” 288/20 WARD 2

Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request. MOVED BY: D. Cook CARRIED The Decision of the Committee is: APPLICATION APPROVED AS AMENDED: To allow a gazebo and shed proposing: 1. A lot coverage of 30.87% whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, permits a maximum lot

coverage of 30.00% in this instance; 2. An occupied area of a shed of 24.34sq.m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, permits a

maximum occupied area of a shed of 20.00sq.m in this instance; 3. A setback measured from a shed to a side lot line of 0.61m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as

amended, requires a minimum setback measured from a shed to a side lot line of 1.20m in this instance; and

4. An occupied area of a gazebo of 32.70sq.m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, permits a maximum occupied area of a gazebo of 20.00sq.m in this instance.













a License, etc.


File: “A” 289/20 WARD 10

Page 1 of 2


Section 45(1) OR (2) of The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended. Application for the property located at 5533 Meadowcrest Avenue.



No Member declared a pecuniary interest for this application. The subject application was heard at approximately 1:28p.m. APPLICATION DETAILS The Applicants request the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow 0 parking spaces for a basement apartment; whereas, By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum of 1 parking space for a basement apartment, in this instance. R. Singh, agent, attended and presented evidence and comment in support of the application. COMMENTS The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:



File: “A” 289/20 WARD 10

Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request. MOVED BY: W. Shahrukh CARRIED The Decision of the Committee is: APPLICATION APPROVED AS AMENDED: A total of 2 parking spaces for the dwelling and second dwelling unit; whereas, By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a total of 3 parking spaces, in this instance. Committee Decision dated at the City of Mississauga on September 24, 2020. “S. PATRIZIO” S. PATRIZIO (CHAIR)












a License, etc.


File: “A” 291/20 WARD 9

Page 1 of 2


Section 45(1) OR (2) of The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended. Application for the property located at 5955 Leeside Crescent.



No Member declared a pecuniary interest for this application. The subject application was heard at approximately 1:37p.m. APPLICATION DETAILS The Applicants request the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow the construction of a below grade entrance within the exterior side yard; whereas, By-law 0225-2007, as amended, does not permit a below grade entrance within an exterior side yard, in this instance. P. Markute, agent, attended and presented evidence and comment in support of the application. COMMENTS The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:


CORRESPONDENCE & DISCUSSION No public comments were received as a result of the public circulation of this application. The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:

• A petition of support was received signed by 10 area residents. Committee asked questions of the agent who appeared before the Committee. DECISION Committee has taken into consideration, on balance, any and all submissions made before its decision including one petition. They have also considered all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, and the majority of the members have determined that the application is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development on the subject property, and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan are maintained.

File: “A” 291/20 WARD 9

Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request. MOVED BY: J. Page CARRIED The Decision of the Committee is: APPLICATION APPROVED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS: To allow the construction of a below grade entrance within the exterior side yard; whereas, By-law 0225-2007, as amended, does not permit a below grade entrance within an exterior side yard, in this instance. CONDITION(S): 1. Construction related to this variance shall be in general conformance with the site plan

approved by the Committee. Committee Decision dated at the City of Mississauga on September 24, 2020. “S. PATRIZIO” S. PATRIZIO (CHAIR)












a License, etc.


aledavi

Received

File: “A” 292/20 WARD 6

Page 1 of 3


Section 45(1) OR (2) of The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended. Application for the property located at 885 Central Parkway West.



No Member declared a pecuniary interest for this application. The subject application was heard at approximately 1:39p.m. APPLICATION DETAILS The applicant requests the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow: 1. A motor vehicle sales leasing and/or rental facility - restricted use accessory to the existing

motor vehicle body repair facility and motor vehicle repair facility - restricted uses whereas Bt-law 0225-2007, as amended, does not permit such a use in this instance;

2. A landscape buffer of 0.00m measured from a lot line that is a street line whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum landscape buffer of 4.50m (approx. 14.76ft) in this instance;

3. An aisle width of 5.13m (approx. 16.83ft) to parking spaces on the easr side of the property and an aisle width of 6.00m (approx. 19.68ft) to the spaces on the south-westerly side of the property whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum aisle width of 7.00m (approx. 22.96ft) in this instance; and

4. 24 parking spaces whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum of 30 parking spaces in this instance.

M. Starr, agent, attended and presented evidence and comment in support of the application. COMMENTS The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:



File: “A” 292/20 WARD 6

Page 2 of 3

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request. MOVED BY: D. George CARRIED The Decision of the Committee is: APPLICATION SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS: To approve a minor variance to allow: 1. A motor vehicle sales leasing and/or rental facility - restricted use accessory to the existing

motor vehicle body repair facility and motor vehicle repair facility - restricted uses whereas Bt-law 0225-2007, as amended, does not permit such a use in this instance;

2. A landscape buffer of 0.00m measured from a lot line that is a street line whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum landscape buffer of 4.50m in this instance;

3. An aisle width of 5.13m to parking spaces on the easr side of the property and an aisle width of 6.00m to the spaces on the south-westerly side of the property whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum aisle width of 7.00m in this instance; and

4. 24 parking spaces whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum of 30 parking spaces in this instance.

CONDITION(S): 1. There shall not be more than three (3) vehicles offered for sale from the premises at one time; 2. There shall not be any retail signage permitted on-site for the subject business operation, save

and accept any signage related to the naming of the business as required exclusively for compliance with Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council regulations;

3. A concrete barrier shall be maintained along the perimeter of the property that abuts a public street to the satisfaction of the Transportation and Works Department.












email [email protected]


File: “A” 292/20 WARD 6

Page 3 of 3

A copy of Section 45 of the Planning Act, as amended, is attached. This decision is subject to appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal by filing with the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment a written notification, giving reasons for the appeal, accompanied with the prescribed fee on or before October 14, 2020. NOTES: 1. A Development Charge may be payable prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Further approvals from the City of Mississauga may be required i.e. a Building Permit, a Zoning Certificate,

a License, etc.

File: “A” 293/20 WARD 1

Page 1 of 2


Section 45(1) OR (2) of The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended. Application for the property located at 1513 Dixie Road.



No Member declared a pecuniary interest for this application. The subject application was heard at approximately 1:44p.m. APPLICATION DETAILS The applicant requests the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow the existing cemetary use to remain accessory to the Place of Worship on the subject property, whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, does not permit an accessory cemetary use in this instance. P. Pearson, agent, attended and presented evidence and comment in support of the application. COMMENTS The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:


CORRESPONDENCE & DISCUSSION The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:

• Correspondence was received from three area resident expressing support for the subject application.

One area residents appeared before the Committee and expressed support for the application. Committee asked questions of the agent who appeared before the Committee. DECISION Committee has taken into consideration, on balance, any and all submissions made before its decision including three written submissions, and one oral submission. They have also considered all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, and the majority of the members have determined that the application is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development on the subject property, and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan are maintained.

File: “A” 293/20 WARD 1

Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request. MOVED BY: D. George CARRIED The Decision of the Committee is: APPLICATION APPROVED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS: To allow the existing cemetary use to remain accessory to the Place of Worship on the subject property, whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, does not permit an accessory cemetary use in this instance. CONDITION(S): 1. The subject property shall contain a maximum of 100 burial plots. Committee Decision dated at the City of Mississauga on September 24, 2020. “S. PATRIZIO” S. PATRIZIO (CHAIR)












a License, etc.


File: “A” 295/20 WARD 2

Page 1 of 2


Section 45(1) OR (2) of The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended. Application for the property located at 1305 Cermel Drive.



No Member declared a pecuniary interest for this application. The subject application was heard at approximately 1:53p.m. APPLICATION DETAILS The applicants request the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow the construction of an inground pool on the subject property proposing a rear yard setback abutting a G2 zone of 3.0m (approx. 9.8ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum rear yard setback abutting a G2 zone of 5.0m (approx. 16.4ft) in this instance. A. Beumont, agent, attended and presented evidence and comment in support of the application. COMMENTS The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:

• City of Mississauga, Planning and Building Department (dated September 14, 2020) • City of Mississauga, Transportation and Works Department (dated September 14, 2020) • City of Mississauga, Community Services Department, Park Planning (dated September 14,

2020) • Region of Peel (dated September 14, 2020)


File: “A” 295/20 WARD 2

Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request. MOVED BY: J. Page CARRIED The Decision of the Committee is: APPLICATION APPROVED: To allow the construction of an inground pool on the subject property proposing a rear yard setback abutting a G2 zone of 3.0m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum rear yard setback abutting a G2 zone of 5.0m in this instance. Committee Decision dated at the City of Mississauga on September 24, 2020. “S. PATRIZIO” S. PATRIZIO (CHAIR)












a License, etc.


File: “A” 4/19 WARD 1

Page 1 of 3


Section 45(1) OR (2) of The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended. Application for the property located at 1341 Stavebank Road.



No Member declared a pecuniary interest for this application. The subject application was heard at approximately 1:55p.m. APPLICATION DETAILS The applicants request the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow the construction of an addition on the subject property proposing an interior side yard of 2.70m (approx. 8.86ft) whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum interior side yard of 3.00m (approx. 9.84ft) in this instance. B. Cabel, owner, attended and presented evidence and comment in support of the application. BACKGROUND On January 17, 2019, B. Cabel, owner, attended and requested to defer the application speak to the Heritage Advisory Committee.

The Committee consented to the request and deferred the application to the May 30th, 2019 hearing. The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:

• City of Mississauga, Planning and Building Department (dated December 21, 2018) • City of Mississauga, Transportation and Works Department (dated December January 20,

2018) • Region of Peel (dated December 18, 2018) • Community Services Department, Culture Division (dated December 12, 2018) • 6 letters of objection were received from area residents

COMMENTS The Secretary – Treasurer noted the comments received from:



Page 2 of 3

CORRESPONDENCE & DISCUSSION No public comments were received as a result of the public circulation of this application. L. Petricca, Planning and Building, spoke to Committee and wished to withdraw staff’s recommendation for deferral since Heritage Planning received and accepted a heritage impact study. Committee asked questions of the owner who appeared before the Committee. DECISION Committee has taken into consideration, on balance, any and all submissions made before its decision including 6 written submissions. They have also considered all relevant materials including: information provided by the applicant, plans submitted, and staff and agency comments, and the majority of the members have determined that the application is minor in nature, desirable for the appropriate development on the subject property, and that the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan are maintained.


Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, the Committee resolves to authorize and grant the request. MOVED BY: J. Page CARRIED The Decision of the Committee is: APPLICATION APPROVED: The applicants request the Committee to approve a minor variance to allow the construction of an addition on the subject property proposing an interior side yard of 2.70m whereas By-law 0225-2007, as amended, requires a minimum interior side yard of 3.00m in this instance. Committee Decision dated at the City of Mississauga on September 24, 2020. “S. PATRIZIO” S. PATRIZIO (CHAIR)












a License, etc.


committee of adjustment results - escribe meetings

Documents