committee on “idaho’s management objectives”. topics paul ... waters that steelhead could...
TRANSCRIPT
851 S.W. Sixth Avenue, Suite 1100 Steve Crow 503-222-5161
Portland, Oregon 97204-1348 Executive Director 800-452-5161
www.nwcouncil.org Fax: 503-820-2370
Joan M. Dukes
Chair
Oregon
Rhonda Whiting
Vice-Chair
Montana
Bruce A. Measure
Montana
James A. Yost
Idaho
W. Bill Booth
Idaho
Bill Bradbury
Oregon
Tom Karier
Washington
Phil Rockefeller
Washington
May 31, 2012
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chair Dukes and members of the Council
FROM: Tony Grover, Fish and Wildlife Division Director
Jeff Allen, Idaho Council Staff
SUBJECT: IDFG hatchery /supplementation polices and activities
Paul Kline, Assistant Chief of Fisheries for the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, will brief the
Committee on “Idaho’s policy guidance, implementation and evaluation of the use of hatcheries and
hatchery-produced anadromous fish to address mitigation and management objectives”. Topics Paul
will cover include:
Review of Idaho’s native fish and hatchery supplementation policy guidance
Historical significance of Snake River salmon and steelhead populations
History of hatchery development in Idaho
Review of hatchery production objectives and associated terminology (harvest mitigation,
conservation, supplementation, etc.)
Overview of Idaho salmon and steelhead hatchery programs (locations, species, purpose)
Hatchery reform and IDFG programs
Review of selected program objectives, timelines, and results (ISS – the Idaho
Supplementation Study, other supplementation programs, Redfish Lake sockeye)
Future State direction and objectives
IDFG Policy guidance, program implementation, and evaluations for
hatchery-produced salmon and steelhead
Paul Kline Idaho Department of Fish and Game
Boise, IDJune 12, 2012
Presentation outline• Geographic orientation
• Significance of Snake River salmon and steelhead
• Department policy on natural- and hatchery-origin salmon and steelhead
• IDFG anadromous hatchery programs, objectives and associated terminology
• Selected programs and accomplishments
Oregon
Idaho
Washington
Columbia R.
0 25 50 75 100 km
NLower
Granite
1975
The
Dalles
1957
John
Day
1968
Bonneville
1938
McNary
1953
Lower
Monumental
1969 Little
Goose
1970Ice
Harbor
1961
Clearwater R.
Grand
Ronde R.
Imnaha
R.
Hells
Canyon
Complex
Geographic orientation
Montana
Geographic orientation
Mountain Snake Province,
Clearwater and SalmonSubbasins
Lewiston
Salmon
• Historically, the Snake River produced:• 55% of the summer steelhead• 40% of the spring Chinook salmon• 45% of the summer Chinook salmonin the Columbia River
• Coho and sockeye were also present• coho extinct in the mid 1980s• sockeye almost extinct in the 1990s
Historical significance
Historical significance
Historically, salmonand steelhead inhabitedstreams in SE Oregon,southern Idaho andNevada
Approximately 50% of Snake River salmonand steelhead habitathas been lost as a resultof dam constructionwhere fish passage wasnot provided
Historicalhabitat
blocked
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Dworshak-Lewiston
Swan Falls
Barber Dam
Warm Springs (Malheur)
Black Canyon (Payette)
Owyhee
Agency Valley (Malheur)
Unity (Burnt)
Brownlee
Lewiston
Hells Canyon Dam Complex Settlement agreement of 1980.Earlier agreement to mitigate
USACE Mitigation Dworshak Steelhead
Hatchery 1969
Lower Snake River Compensation Program
(1976 for 4 lower Snake River dams)
Historical significance
1980 Northwest Power ActCouncil, FW Program
BPA funding
Development of hatchery programs• Hatcheries came online to mitigate for
hydroelectric dam const. and operation:• Private: 4 IPC hatcheries (1962 – 1967)• National: Dworshak, Kooskia, Hagerman
NFHs (1966, 1985)• USFWS: 4 State-operated LSRCP
hatcheries (1979 – 1992)• BPA: Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery 2002,Eagle Hatchery modifications (2008) andSpringfield (IDFG) and Crystal Springs (SBT) in the next few years
Hatchery fish management policy • Hatcheries built as partial mitigation for
hydroelectric development
• Hatcheries function primarily to produce fish for harvest
• Artificial production limited or absent in wild production areas. Releases managed to minimize impacts on native fish
Department’s mission:
To preserve, protect, perpetuate and manage Idaho’s wildlife resources to provide for citizens… and to provide continued supplies for hunting, fishing and trapping
Hatchery fish management policy
Grande
Ronde R.
Looking Glass
Lostine
Tucannon
Imnaha
Upper
Grande
Ronde
Catherine
Cr.
DworshakNPTH
Clearwater
Kooskia
Rapid R.
Johnson Cr.
S. Fork
SalmonPahsimeroi
Sawtooth
Oxbow
Salmon R.
Clearwater R.
Imnaha R.
Eagle
SpringfieldMagic Valley
Niagara Springs
Hagerman NFH
USFWS (+ COE)
BPA
IPC
Funding
Lyons Ferry
Tribal and sport fisheries - Snake, Clearwater & Salmon Rivers
Grande
Ronde R.
Salmon R.
Clearwater R.
NPT
Imnaha R.
SBT
SportID
OR
WA
CTUIR
Idaho’s spring/summer Chinook hatchery programs
Hatchery Operator Eyed-eggs smolts
McCall IDFG 600,000 1,100,000
Pahsimeroi IDFG 1,000,000
Rapid River IDFG 3,000,000
Sawtooth IDFG 1,700,000
Totals 600,000 6,800,000
Salmon River Spring/Summer Chinook Releases
Hatchery Operator Eyed-eggs Sub-yearlings smolts
Dworshak NFH USFWS/NPT 1,050,000
Kooskia NFH NPT 50,000 600,000
NPTH NPT 625,000 200,000
Clearwater IDFG 300,000 2,535,000
Totals 975,000 4,385,000
Clearwater River Spring/Summer Chinook Releases
Total sp/su Chinook eggs and juveniles released: 12,760,000
Idaho’s fall Chinook and coho hatchery programs
Hatchery Operator Eyed-eggs Sub-yearlings smolts
Eagle Creek NFH USFWS/NPT 550,000
Dworshak NFH NPT 280,000
Potlatch NPT 30,000
Totals 30,000 830,000
Clearwater River Coho Releases
Hatchery Operator Eyed-eggs Sub-yearlings smolts
Lyons Ferry WDFW/NPT 1,400,000 450,000
NPTH NPT 1,400,000
Dworshak NFH USFWS/NPT 328,000
Oxbow IPC/IDFG 1,000,000
Totals 4,128,000 450,000
Clearwater/Snake River Fall Chinook Chinook Releases
Idaho’s steelhead hatchery programs
Hatchery Operator Eyed-eggs smolts
Hagerman NFH USFWS 1,360,000
Magic Valley IDFG 1,540,000
Niagara Springs IDFG 1,800,000
Pahsimeroi IDFG 500,000
Sawtooth IDFG 500,000
Totals 1,000,000 4,700,000
Salmon River Steelhead Releases
Hatchery Operator Eyed-eggs smolts
Dworshak NFH USFWS/NPT 2,100,000
Clearwater IDFG 843000
Totals 2,943,000
Clearwater River Steelhead Releases
Total steelhead eggs and smolts released: 8,643,000
Idaho’s Hatchery Programs• Putting release numbers in perspective for
sp/su Chinook and summer steelhead:
• Snake River hatcheries produce 34% of all sp/su Chinook produced in Columbia River drainage (31% in Idaho)
• Snake River hatcheries produce 61% of all summer steelhead produced in Columbia River drainage (52% in Idaho)
1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s
Almost all waters that salmon could access were open to fishing.
1950s and prior, season open all year. Harvest is entirely wild origin.
Start to see transition to more hatchery fish in the harvest in 1970s.
Many river sections were being closed to fishing.
South Fork Salmon River closed beginning 1966. Rapid River Hatchery begins contributing to harvest in 1967.
No Chinook seasons, 1979-1984.
Limited seasons for RR fish 1985-1993
No Chinook seasons, 1994-1996
Open seasons since 1997
Harvest management history – Chinook
1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s
All waters that steelhead could access were open to fishing.
Last record of harvest in the Lochsa, Selway, South Fork Salmon River and Middle Fork Salmon River drainages was in 1973.
Seasons and locations restricted 1976-1989
Consistent seasons 1990s and 2000s. Harvest very good in some years
Harvest management history – Steelhead
No harvest in 1975
Oxbow Hatchery begins contributing to harvest in 1966.
Native fish conservation policy • Commission-approved
• “The Department willemphasize maintainingremaining populationsof wild, native stocksof salmon and steelheadwhere they occur in sustainable habitat”
• Maintain genetic integrityand diversity….
Steelhead
Sp/Su Chinook
Clearwater River SteelheadMPG
Sp/Su Chinook not-listed
Steelhead
Salmon River SteelheadMPG
Sp/Su Chinook
Salmon River Sp/SuChinook MPGs
SF Salmon, MF Salmon, Up. Salmon
• Snake River fall ChinookESU
• Blocked upstream of Hells Canyon complex
• Nez Perce began releasingfall Chinook in 2003
• IPC settlement agreementprogram
Snake River fall Chinook ESU
Nez Perce Tribefall Chinook release sites
IDFG fall Chinook releasesite (IPC)
Fall Chinook release locations
• Snake River sockeye ESU
• Wallowa, Payette, and Warm Springs populationsextirpated
• Stanley, Yellowbelly,Alturas, and Pettitpopulations extirpated
Snake River sockeye ESU
Idaho’s Hatchery ProgramsHarvest augmentation refers to the stocking
of anadromous fish where the primary purpose
is to return adults for sport, tribal, and
commercial harvest
• Beginning in the 1980s hatcheries began to be used to address additional objectives:
• The enhancement of natural production through supplementation and
• The conservation of important stocks at risk using captive broodstocking
Idaho’s Hatchery Programs
• Development of new programs influenced by:
• Agency policy/ management (stated conservation objectives)
• Current mitigation program language
• ESA (broodstock management)
• US v Oregon Production Agreement
• Hatchery reform (recommendations)
Idaho’s Hatchery Programs
Supplementation is the use of artificial
propagation in an attempt to maintain or
increase natural production, while maintaining
the long-term fitness of the target population
and keeping the ecological and genetic impacts
on non-target populations within specified
biological limits (RASP 1992).
Idaho’s Hatchery Programs
Conservation hatcheries focus on maintaining genetic resources, using the amplification potential of the hatchery, and restoring natural populations that face demographic, genetic, or ecological risks. The expectation is to maintain equivalent genetic resources of the native stock, and to return fish to the habitat to reproduce naturally. Time in culture should be minimized
Idaho’s Hatchery Programs
Integrated Goal:
1 population,
2 environments
Hatchery Wild Hatchery Wild
Segregated Goal:
2 populations,
2 environments
Integrated Segregated
Idaho’s Hatchery Programs
Theory Behind Guidelines for Integrated
Programs (from model of Ford 2002)
Natural selection pulls an integrated
population in two directions.
Hatchery
Optimum
Natural
Optimum
Hatchery selective
forces
Natural selective
forces
Equilibrium point is determined by balance between
hatchery-to-wild and wild-to-hatchery gene flow rates.
Integrated
population
Idaho’s Hatchery Programs
1990 RASP process
1994 IHOT process
1998 APR process
2000 Return to the River (ISG)
2003 ISAB review of supplementation
2003 ISRP review of Idaho ISS
2003 APRE report
2005 ISRP/ISAB review of sup. RME
2008 ADHOC Supplementation Work
2009 HSRG/HRT
Idaho’s Hatchery Programs
HatcheryReform
Review of selected integrated supplementation and conservation
programs
Idaho Supplementation StudyProject 198909800
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
Baseline data collection
Brood stock development
Juvenile releases from F1 broodstock
Juvenile
Release
Adult return / treatment / F2 broodstock
Control &Treatment
StreamMonitoring
2007
2012-14
Adult return / treatment
2012-14
Idaho Supplementation Study
Stanley
Salmon
Treatment
Reference
Weir & Trap
Trap
Weir
No infrastructure
Weir & Trap
Trap
No infrastructure
Lewiston
Idaho Supplementation Study
Baseline Supplement Evaluate
Experimental phase
0
Me
tric
+
-
Idaho Supplementation Study
• Data analysis and final reporting 2014-2015
• Preliminary results from one stream (Pahsimeroi)indicate:
• supplementation (hatchery) and natural adultsrandomly mating in the wild
• the contribution of parents and relativereproductive success of supplementation andnatural adults to first generation smolts equal
Idaho Supplementation Study (ISS)
Chinook captive rearingProject 200740300
Chinook captive rearing
• Initiated in 1995 when record low numbers ofsp/su Chinook returned to the Snake River
• Using conservation aquaculture techniques to rearChinook full-term to maturation in the hatchery
• Determining contribution of captive-reared adultsto subsequent generations
• Will identify advantages/disadvantages of thisapproach and contrast with concurrently runcaptive broodstock program in E. Oregon.
• This program will sunset in 2015
Sockeye captive broodstockProject 200740200
Sockeye captive broodstock
• Initiated in 1991 after a prolonged period of lowreturns of sockeye to the Snake River
• Using conservation aquaculture techniques to rearsockeye full-term to maturation in the hatchery
• Maintained population genetic diversity andlikely prevented extinction
• Expanding program into “re-colonization” phaseusing smolt releases to increase anad. returns.
Other examples
• New integrated broodstock programs for threesp/su Chinook populations and one steelhead pop.
• Upper Salmon, Pahsimeroi, SF Salmon Chinook• EF Salmon Steelhead
• New efforts to establish localized broodstocksof steelhead in Clearwater and Salmon River basins
• SF Clearwater steelhead• Salmon River B-run steelhead
• Programs address IDFG conservationpriorities and HSRG/HRT recommendations
Next steps?
Next steps
• HGMPs should continueto be used to identifyprogram goals, objectives, approaches to implementation, and M&E plans
• To continue to form the foundation of biological information used by NOAA for ESA decisionmaking and permitting
HGMP
Next steps
• The region’s dedication to implementing hatchery reform recommendations has been exemplary
• Best management practices are being implemented consistently across the region and hatchery goals and objectives are being defined and effectively pursued
HSRG
Next steps
• Developed a strategy to integrate individual hatchery evaluation programs into a regional framework
• With standardized protocols for M&E,continued/expanded VSP monitoring, and continued/expanded RRS studies
AHSWG
Next steps
• The Region is still finalizing goals for SR salmon and steelhead.
• Development of implementation strategies that may require program modifications
Snake River Recovery Plan
slide 50
• Idaho will continue to emphasize the importance of fisheries and the production of fish for harvest
• Ensure that wild fish populations are managed effectively and that remaining habitat is protected or improved
• Continue implementation supplementation and conservation aquaculture programs that address agency priorities
• Stress the importance of defining goals and objectives for hatchery programs and ensuring appropriate monitoring and evaluation programs as well as adaptive management frameworks are in place to effectively manage outcomes
slide 51
• Continue to implement elements of hatchery reform described in HSRG, HRT, and other documents
• Participate in regional discussions to develop guidance for supplementation actions, monitoring, and evaluation (e.g., CRHEET)
• Support the development of tools such as genetic stock identification (GSI) and parentage-based tagging (PBT) to refine our ability to identify hatchery-origin and natural-origin salmon and steelhead – and as tools for evaluating supplementation and RRS studies