committee on culture and education quality assurance … survey... · committee on culture and...

34
Committee on Culture and Education Quality assurance and accreditation of Online and Distance Higher Education”. 24 January 2017 George Ubachs EADTU

Upload: hadang

Post on 05-Sep-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Committee on Culture andEducation

“Quality assurance and accreditationof Online and Distance Higher

Education”.24 January 2017

George UbachsEADTU

SURVEY: QUALITY ASSURANCE ANDACCREDITATION FOR BLENDED ANDONLINE EDUCATION

2

Lead authors: Jeff Haywood, PietHenderikx, Martin Weller, Keith

Williams, Louise Connelly

NATIONAL FRAMEWORKS ANDREGULATIONS

4

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 5

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 6

• National governments should review theirlegislative and regulatory frameworks andpractices for quality assurance andaccreditation in higher education (includingrecognition of prior learning) to ensure thatthey encourage, and do not impede, theprovision of more flexible educational formats,including degrees and other ECTS-bearingcourses that are fully online.

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 7

Recommendation 1

SUPPORTIVE ACTIONS FOREXTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE

8

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 9

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 10

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 11

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 12

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 13

• National QA agencies should develop theirown in-house expertise and establishprocesses that are sufficiently flexible toinclude recognising and supporting newmodes of teaching and learning. They shouldevaluate institutions on their active support ofinnovation (or importantly, the lack of it), andits impact on the quality of teaching andlearning.

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 14

Recommendation 2

• ENQA and other relevant European networksshould support the sharing of good practice bynational QA agencies in the development ofcriteria on the recognition of new modes ofteaching and learning.

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 15

Recommendation 3

• Building on the strong existing base of digitaleducation, European and national metricsshould be established to record the typologiesand extent of online, blended, and openeducation at institutional and national levels.This would enable institutions to comparethemselves with others and to monitor theirown progress.

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 16

Recommendation 4

STUDENT NEEDS AND EXTERNALQUALITY ASSURANCE

17

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 18

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 19

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 20

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 21

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 22

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 23

• ENQA and other relevant European networks shouldsupport measures taken by institutions related to theneeds of non-traditional target groups and part-timestudents and to widening access strategies, includingwell-structured, but flexible education leading to studyprogress and success. This will also include digitalpedagogies in blended and online course design,collaborative learning in small groups, formative andsummative e-assessment. They should assure thatinstitutional strategies and the continuous professionaldevelopment of teaching staff involve innovationthrough digital teaching and learning.

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 24

Recommendation 5

INSTITUTIONAL QUALITYASSURANCE

25

• Institutional leaders should develop innovationstrategies using the potential of new modes ofteaching and learning for he quality enhancementof higher education and eventually for extendingtheir provisions to non-traditional and part-timestudents by flexible modes of delivery. In thesestrategies, the continuous professionaldevelopment of staff should embrace digitaleducation and deal as well with off campusstudents, when they are there.

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 26

Recommendation 6

• Staff should be supported by technical andpedagogical experts. Institutions shouldpromote sharing expertise by staff incommunities of practice or course teams.Institutional evaluation and research shouldbe part of the quality assurance process.Internal quality assurance for digital modes ofteaching and learning should be developed inpartnership with the external qualityassurance agencies.

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 27

Recommendation 7

ACCREDITATION

28

• Distance education should be accredited according thesame rules as face to face programmes. If accreditationis based on quality reviews or if quality reviews arerequested for programmes accredited by law, reviewsshould take in account specific criteria, indicators,guidelines or frameworks.

• If short learning programmes need an accreditation,this should preferably be based on an ex post qualityreview. Institutional quality assurance should beapplicable beforehand, as is also the case for MOOCs.

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 29

Recommendation 8

CRITERIA FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE:E-XCELLENCE

30

EMPOWERING UNIVERSITIES

32

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 33

George Ubachs

[email protected]

24 January 2017 George Ubachs, EADTU 34

Thank you!