community close-up · community close-up consolidated plan needs assessment input session your...

Community Close-Up Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment Input Session

Your Voice Counts!

The Consolidated Plan: A Five-Year Planning Approach

Consolidated Planning Process

Planning & Assessment

Consolidated Plan /Annual Plan

Program(s)Implementation

Evaluation & Reporting

CAPER

Program year ends

Program evaluation

Data gathering

Input sessions

Program year begins

Public hearing

Submission to HUD

HUD approval, fund allocation

2008-2012 Consolidated PlanAnnual HUD Program Allocations

Program 2007-08 2008-09 Change

ADDI $274,384 $105,402 $168,982 (-62%)

CDBG $19,767,200 $19,247,912 $519,288 (-3%)

ESG $1,668,289 $1,673,895 $5,606 (+.3%)

HOME $13,498,170 $12,782,351 $715,819 (-5%)

HOPWA $615,000 $634,000 $19,000 (+3%)

Total $35,823,043 $34,443,560 $1,379,483 (-4%)

http://www.hudclips.org/gif/hudlogoc.gif

Consolidated Plan Input Session Schedule

•March 4, 2008 –

Abingdon

•March 5, 2008 –

Richmond

•March 6, 2008 –

Annandale

•March 7, 2008 –

Hampton

Note:• The State Consolidated Plan online input survey is available to those unable to attend an input session and to those with further input.

• Consolidated Plan Online Input Survey is found at: www.dhcd.virginia.gov

Consolidated Plan Timeline - 2008

MAR MAY

Data Collection (Input sessions, online survey, consultations and existing data sources)(Completed by Apr 1)

Public hearing notification posted online(Mar 17)

Public Hearing(Apr 14)

Board review ofkey decision points(Apr 21 Board Meeting)

APR

Public hearing notification published in newspapers(Apr 3)

Consolidated Plan published for 30-day comment period(Apr 15)

Board approval of Consolidated Plan 2008-2012 and 2008-09 Annual Action Plan(May 19 Board Meeting)

Submission to HUD(May 19)

Augusta

Halifax

Bath

Lee Scott

Bedford

Franklin

Pittsylvania

Wise

Louisa

Fauquier

Albemarle

Wythe

Carroll

Rockingham

Smyth

Giles

Patrick

Floyd

Nelson

Sussex

Henry

Caroline

Russell

Bland

Suffolk

Craig

Fairfax

Loudoun

Page

Tazewell

Botetourt

Surry

Amherst

Hanover

Brunsw

ick

Rockbridge

Campbell

Mecklenburg

Amelia

Charlotte

Grayson

Dinwiddie

Buchanan

Washington

Highland

Buckingham

Essex

Freder

ick

Orange

Alleghany

Pulaski

Southampton

Culpeper

Accom

ack

Shenandoah

Lunenburg

Madison

Chesterfield

Stafford

Nottoway

Spotsylvania

Dickenson

Henrico

Fluvanna

Montgomery

Warren

Isle of W

ight

Clarke

Appomattox

Chesapeake

GoochlandPowhatan

Cumberland

Prince Edward

New Kent

Richmond

Greene

Virginia Beach

Prince George

Lancaster

Charles City

King George

RoanokeYork

Greensville

Prince William

King William

Gloucester

King and Queen

Rappahannock

Westmoreland

Middlesex

James City

Northumberland

NorthamptonMathews

Norfolk

Newport NewsHampton

Danville

LynchburgRichmond City

Portsmouth

Roanoke City

Arlington

Staunton

Petersburg

Bristol

Poquoson

Alexandria

Galax

Harrisonburg

Radford

Waynesboro

Hopewell

Norton

Manassas

Martinsville

Winchester

Emporia

Charlottesville

Fredericksburg

Williamsburg

Franklin City

Fairfax City

Buena VistaCovington

Bedford City

Lexington

Percent of Virginia Households Below Poverty in Year 2000

(From 2000 Census) Jurisdictions with Highest Proportionof Households Living Below Poverty Level, By Percentage

1. Radford2. Harrisonburg3. Lee4. Buchanan5. Norton6. Charlottesville7. Lexington8. Dickenson 9. Montgomery10. Galax

30.57 percent26.48 percent25.36 percent23.88 percent23.29 percent22.74 percent22.49 percent22.41 percent22.14 percent20.42 percent

±

Updated: October 19, 2007

Percent of Households Below Poverty Level, 20000.00% - 7.99%

8.00% - 11.99%

12.00% - 15.99%

16.00% - 19.99%

20.00% - 31.00%

(From 2000 Census) Jurisdictions with Lowest Proportionof Households Living Below Poverty Level, By Percentage

1. Loudoun2. Stafford 3. Fairfax 4. York 5. Prince William 6. Falls Church7. Hanover 8. Chesterfield 9. Poquoson10. Spotsylvania


Source: Census 2000

Augusta

Halifax

Bath

Lee Scott

Bedford

Franklin

Pittsylvania

Wise

Louisa

Fauquier

Albemarle

Wythe

Carroll

Rockingham

Smyth

Giles

Patrick

Floyd

Nelson

Sussex

Henry

Caroline

Russell

Bland

Suffolk

Craig

Fairfax

Loudoun

Page

Tazewell

Botetourt

Surry

Amherst

Hanover

Brunsw

ick

Rockbridge

Campbell

Mecklenburg

Amelia

Charlotte

Grayson

Dinwiddie

Buchanan

Washington

Highland

Buckingham

Essex

Freder

ick

Orange

Alleghany

Pulaski

Southampton

Culpeper

Accom

ack

Shenandoah

Lunenburg

Madison

Chesterfield

Stafford

Nottoway

Spotsylvania

Dickenson

Henrico

Fluvanna

Montgomery

Warren

Isle of W

ight

Clarke

Appomattox

Chesapeake

GoochlandPowhatan

Cumberland

Prince Edward

New Kent

Richmond

Greene

Virginia Beach

Prince George

Lancaster

Charles City

King George

Percentage of Virginia Households Expending 30 Percent or More of Household Income

on Housing Expenses, Year 2000

Percentage of Households Spending 30% of Income or More on Housing13% - 17%

18% - 21%

22% - 24%

25% - 30%

31% - 37%

Selected Jurisdictions and Corresponding Proportion of Households Expending 30 Percent or More of Income on Housing

Norfolk Richmond CityMontgomery Suffolk Virginia Beach Alexandria Albemarle Arlington Prince William

35 Percent34 Percent33 Percent31 Percent31 Percent27 Percent26 Percent26 Percent26 Percent

±


Hampton

James City

Newport News

Gloucester

K. William

King and QueenMiddlesex

Mathews

Northam

pton

Prince William

Northumberland

NorfolkPortsmouth

Westmoreland

ArlingtonAlexandria

York

Richmond

Source: Census 2000

Augusta, 8%

Bedford, 5%

Rockingham, 8%

Albemarle, 6%

Suffolk, 2%

Hanover, 5%

Loudoun, 19%

Chesterfield, 7%

Fairfax, 12%

Frederick, 9%

Spotsylvania, 9%

Montgomery, 5%

Roanoke, 1%

Stafford, 12%

Chesapeake, 8%

Henrico, 7%

Prince William, 16%

Virginia Beach, 6%

Newport News, 9%

Norfolk, 8%Hampton, 4%

Lynchburg, 2%Richmond City, 8%

Portsmouth, 11%

Roanoke City, 4%

Arlington, 6%Alexandria, 8%

Proportion Increases by City/County of Virginia Households Expending 30 Percent or More of Household Income

on Housing Expenses, From 2000 to 2006

(From Available 2006 Census Estimates) Jurisdictions with Highest Increase in Proportion of Households Expending 30 Percent or More of Household Income on Housing

1. Loudoun 2. Prince William 3. Fairfax 4. Stafford 5. Portsmouth 6. Frederick 7. Spotsylvania 8. Newport News 9. Augusta 10. Rockingham

19 percentage point increase16 percentage point increase12 percentage point increase12 percentage point increase11 percentage point increase9 percentage point increase9 percentage point increase9 percentage point increase8 percentage point increase8 percentage point increase

±


Increase in Percentage1% - 2%

3% - 6%

7% - 9%

10% - 12%

13% - 19%

(Estimate Not Available for 2006)

Source: Census 2000, Year 2006 Estimates

Home Prices and Income (2000-2005 Change)

80.60%

55.21%

14.23% 15.55%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

U.S. Change inHome Prices

U.S. Change inHouseholdIncomes

VA Change inHome Prices

VA Change inHousehold

Income

Fair Market Rent in Virginia

2008 Fair Market Rents, 2BR Apt, Virginia Metro AreasSource: Bureau of Labor Statistics

$1,324

$904 $870 $847

$656 $649 $639 $595 $535

$0$200$400$600$800

$1,000$1,200$1,400

DC

-Arli

ngto

n-Al

exan

dria

, DC

-VA

-MD

HM

FA

Virg

inia

Bea

ch-N

orfo

lk-N

ewpo

rtN

ews,

VA-

NC

MSA

Ric

hmon

d H

MFA

Cha

rlotte

sville

, VA

MSA

Roa

noke

, VA

HM

FA

Har

rison

burg

, VA

MSA

Blac

ksbu

rg-C

hris

tians

burg

-R

adfo

rd, V

A H

MFA

Lync

hbur

g, V

A M

SA

King

spor

t-Bris

tol-B

risto

l, TN

-VA

MSA

Housing Wage in Virginia

Household Salary Necessary to Afford 2008 Fair Market Rent for 2BR Apt without Paying Above 30% of Income on Housing, VA Metro Areas

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

$52,960

$36,160 $34,800 $33,880

$26,240 $25,960 $25,560 $23,800$21,400

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

DC

-Arli

ngto

n-A

lexa

ndria

,D

C-V

A-M

DH

MFA

Virg

inia

Bea

ch-N

orfo

lk-

New

port

New

s,V

A-N

C M

SA

Ric

hmon

dH

MFA

Cha

rlotte

svill

e,V

A M

SA

Roa

noke

, VA

HM

FA

Har

rison

burg

,V

A M

SA

Bla

cksb

urg-

Chr

istia

nsbu

rg-

Rad

ford

, VA

HM

FA

Lync

hbur

g, V

AM

SA

Kin

gspo

rt-B

risto

l-Bris

tol,

TN-V

A M

SA

Housing Wage in Virginia

Housing Wage in 2008 - (to Afford 2BR Apt at Fair Market Rent),Virginia Metro Areas


$25.46

$17.38 $16.73 $16.29

$12.62 $12.48 $12.29 $11.44$10.29

$0.00

$5.00

$10.00

$15.00

$20.00

$25.00

$30.00

DC

-Arli

ngto

n-Al

exan

dria

, DC

-VA

-MD

HM

FA

Virg

inia

Bea

ch-

Nor

folk

-N

ewpo

rt N

ews,

VA-N

C M

SA

Ric

hmon

dH

MFA

Cha

rlotte

sville

,VA

MSA

Roa

noke

, VA

HM

FA

Har

rison

burg

,VA

MSA

Blac

ksbu

rg-

Chr

istia

nsbu

rg-

Rad

ford

, VA

HM

FA

Lync

hbur

g, V

AM

SA

King

spor

t-Br

isto

l-Bris

tol,

TN-V

A M

SA

Richmond, VA MSA3.4532%Lynchburg, VA MSA

3.4522%Ro

anoke,

VA MS

A3.4

157%

Charlottesville, VA MSA

2.6127%

Danville,

VA MSA

6.2267%

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MSA3.0343%

Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MSA3.5194%

Harrisonburg, VA MSA2.5322%

Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA MSA3.6731%

Winchester, VA-WV MSA3.2821%

Virginia Unemployment Rates (Dec 2007)by Metropolitan Statistical Area


±

VA Unemployment Rate - Dec '072.5% - 2.6%

2.6% - 3.0%

3.0% - 3.5%

3.5% - 3.7%

3.7% - 6.3%Updated March 14, 2008

Halifax,

454 unitsPittsylvania,

440 units

Rockingham,405 units

Scott,302 units Mecklenburg,

306 units

Fairfax,1122 units

Accomack,404 units

Henrico,384 units

Virginia Beach,433 units

Newport News,381 units

Norfolk,560 units

Richmond City,454 units

Arlington,516 units

Occupied Housing Units in Virginia Lacking Complete Plumbing Facilities in 2000

Ten Virginia Jurisdictions with Highest Numbers of OccupiedHousing Units Lacking Complete Plumbing Facilities (in year 2000)

1. Fairfax 2. Norfolk3. Arlington 4. Halifax 5. Richmond City6. Pittsylvania 7. Virginia Beach8. Rockingham 9. Accomack 10. Henrico

1122 occupied housing units560 occupied housing units516 occupied housing units454 occupied housing units454 occupied housing units440 occupied housing units433 occupied housing units405 occupied housing units404 occupied housing units384 occupied housing units

±


# of Occupied Units Lacking Complete Plumbing Facilities0 - 78

79 - 179

180 - 306

307 - 560

561 - 1,122

Source: Census 2000

Halifax,

454 units, 3.023%Mecklenburg,

306 units, 2.3628% Brunsw

ick,

174 un

its, 2.7

72%

Southampton,

263 units, 4.1886%Scott, 302 units, 3.0832%

Shenandoah,

290 units, 2.0285%

Lunenburg, 100 units, 2.0008%

Buckingham, 161 units, 3.024%

Rockbridge, 188 units, 2.2154%

Caroline, 197 units, 2.4561%

Sussex, 116 units, 2.8114%

Nelson, 194 units, 3.2954%

Charlotte, 179 units, 3.6154%

Highland, 26 units, 2.2989%

Lee, 228 units, 2.3491%

Accomack, 404 units, 2.6407%

Amelia, 85 units, 2.0047%

Floyd, 117 units, 2.0204%

Dickenson, 135 units, 2.0053%

Essex, 96 units, 2.403%

Surry, 53 units, 2.0237%

Madison, 149 units, 3.1441%

Rappahannock, 78 units, 2.7977%

King William, 114 units, 2.3525%

Westmoreland, 198 units, 2.8922%

Richmond, 78 units, 2.6558%

Charles City, 73 units, 2.7341%

Northumberland, 158 units, 2.8885%

Lancaster, 113 units, 2.2582%

Northampton, 245 units, 4.6044%

Mathews, 83 units, 2.1109%

Percent of Occupied Housing Units in Virginia Lacking Complete Plumbing Facilities in 2000

Ten Virginia Jurisdictions with Highest Proportion of OccupiedHousing Units Lacking Complete Plumbing Facilities (in year 2000)

1. Northampton2. Southampton3. Charlotte4. Nelson5. Madison6. Scott7. Buckingham8. Halifax9. Westmoreland10. Northumberland


±


Percent of Occupied Housing Units0.00% - 0.99%

1.00% - 1.99%

2.00% - 5.00%

1. Halifax County2. Accomack County3. Mecklenburg County4. Scott County

453 units, 3.02% of occupied units404 units, 2.64% of occupied units306 units, 2.36% of occupied units302 units, 3.08% of occupied units

Jurisdictions with Proportions Greater Than 2.00 Percent and Total Numbers Over 300 Units

Source: Census 2000

Number of Households with Substandard Conditions in 2000

by Type of Condition

86,456

19,55015,070

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

Over Crowded Conditions Lack Complete IndoorPlumbing

Lack Complete Kitchen

Percent of Virginians Age 60+Source: Virginia Department for the Aging

and Virginia Employment Commission ("Population Projections")

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

2000 2010 Projection 2020 Projection 2030 Projection

Augusta

Halifax

Bath

Lee Scott

Bedford

Franklin

Pittsylvania

Wise

Louisa

Fauquier

Albemarle

Wythe

Carroll

Rockingham

Smyth

Giles

Patrick

Floyd

Nelson

Sussex

Henry

Caroline

Russell

Bland

Suffolk

Craig

Fairfax

Loudoun

Page

Tazewell

Botetourt

Surry

Amherst

Hanover

Brunsw

ick

Rockbridge

Campbell

Mecklenburg

Amelia

Charlotte

Grayson

Dinwiddie

Buchanan

Washington

Highland

Buckingham

Essex

Freder

ick

Orange

Alleghany

Pulaski

Southampton

Culpeper

Accom

ack

Shenandoah

Lunenburg

Madison

Chesterfield

Stafford

Nottoway

Spotsylvania

Dickenson

Henrico

Fluvanna

Montgomery

Warren

Isle of W

ight

Clarke

Appomattox

Chesapeake

GoochlandPowhatan

Cumberland

Prince Edward

New Kent

Richmond

Greene

Virginia Beach

Prince George

Lancaster

Charles City

King George

RoanokeYork

Greensville

Prince William

King William

Gloucester

King and Queen

Rappahannock

Westmoreland

Middlesex

James City

Northumberland

NorthamptonMathews

Norfolk

Newport NewsHampton

Danville

LynchburgRichmond City

Portsmouth

Roanoke City

Arlington

Staunton

Petersburg

Bristol

Poquoson

Alexandria

Galax

Harrisonburg

Radford

Waynesboro

Hopewell

Norton

Manassas

Martinsville

Winchester

Emporia

Charlottesville

Fredericksburg

Williamsburg

Franklin City

Fairfax City

Buena VistaCovington

Bedford City

Lexington

Virginians Ages 60 Plus, Year 2030 Projection

±


Number of Persons Age 60 or Over0 - 24,999

25,000 - 49,000

50,000 - 74,999

75,000 - 99,999

100,000 - 124,000

Source: Virginia Department for the Aging and Virginia Employment Commission ("Population Projections")

1. Chesterfield2. Prince William3. Henrico4. Virginia Beach5. Loudoun6. Newport News7. Stafford8. Hampton9. Richmond City10. Chesapeake

112,229 persons age 60+109,940 persons age 60+86,239 persons age 60+81,085 persons age 60+80,589 persons age 60+65,852 persons age 60+65,715 persons age 60+57,159 persons age 60+55,121 persons age 60+52,573 persons age 60+

Cities/Counties with Highest Projected Population of Persons Age 60+ in 2030

Supplemental Security Income, By Households in Virginia, Year 2000

Jurisdictions with Highest Proportion of Households Receiving Supplemental Security Income in 20001. Buchanan 2. Lee 3. Norton4. Emporia5. Wise 6. Scott 7. Dickenson 8. Russell 9. Petersburg10. Bedford City


±


Percent of Households Receiving SSI0.00% - 2.99%

3.00% - 4.99%

5.00% - 6.99%

7.00% - 8.99%

9.00% - 13.00%

From Census 2000 Data

DHCD’s HOME Investment Results

Increasing and Sustaining the Number of Affordable Decent Homes in the Commonwealth of Virginia

(2006-07)

672

1,114

Goal , 200 Goal , 143Goal , 100

Goal , 443

Actual , 92

Actual , 350

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

Affordable HousingProduction

Homeownership HomeownerRehabilitation

Total

DHCD’s CDBG, ESG, and HOPWA Accomplishments (July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007)

CDBG:Assisted 32 business Assisted 550 persons with obtaining/maintaining jobsCompleted 5 sewer/water projectsCompleted 5 flood/drainage improvementsMade 3 street improvementsCompleted a medical center expansion project*Note these are only a sampling of CDBG accomplishment. Please see the 2006-07 CAPER for a complete list.

ESG:Supported 2,997 ESG-funded beds and supportive services. Provided residential and non-residential services to nearly 33,000 individuals About 10,000 were sheltered in emergency shelter or transitional housing About 40 percent (4,000) of the 10,000 sheltered individuals were children served through the ESG program. During the same time period DHCD administered HOPWA funds that served 249 individuals with HIV/AIDS in Virginia.

HOPWA:DHCD administered HOPWA funds that served 249 individuals with HIV/AIDS in Virginia.

Additional Information

Contact Info• Lyndsi Austin• Email: [email protected]

Consolidated Plan Input Session Schedule•March 4, 2008 –

Abingdon•March 5, 2008 –

Richmond•March 6, 2008 –

Annandale•March 7, 2008 –

Hampton

Online Survey•

This survey will be made available on DHCD’s website at www.dhcd.virginia.gov

community close-up · community close-up consolidated plan needs assessment input session your...

Documents