community health advisory & information network (chain) project needs assessment committee...
TRANSCRIPT
COMMUNITY HEALTH ADVISORY & INFORMATION NETWORK
(CHAIN) PROJECT
Needs Assessment CommitteeAngela Aidala, Maria Caban,
and Maiko YomogidaFebruary 3, 2011
Introduction: Planning Questions
What services do HIV+ persons need?
Where do they go for care?
What are their unmet needs/ service gaps?
What populations are underserved?
What works well, what doesn’t work?
What are the barriers and access issues?
WHERE SHOULD WE PUT OUR MONEY?
CHAIN PROJECT GOALS
To provide a profile of PLWH/A in New York City and the Tri-County Region
To assess the system of HIV care – both health and social services – from the perspective of people living with HIV
To report on unmet needs, service utilization trends, and outcomes to the Planning Council and its Committees
History of CHAIN Initially developed in 1993 as one of the Planning
Council’s evaluation resources
Contract with Columbia University School of Public Health
CHAIN has recruited 4 cohorts of PLWH/A- NYC I (1994-2002, n=968)- NYC II (2002-present, n=1114)- Tri-County I (2001-2007, n=482)
- Tri-County II (2008-present, n=360) A Technical Review Team (TRT) which includes
representatives of the Planning Council, Public Health Solutions, NYCDOHMH and WDOH oversees CHAIN
17 Year Highlights (1994 -2011)
2000+ PLWHA completed ave. 4+ interviews
850-item questionnaire
120 trained interviewers
150+ reports Multiple presentations to Planning Council,
Council Committees, PPG, HAWG, provider and community groups, professional conferences
Steps in the Process
Develop a research strategy
Consult with stakeholders
Develop research infrastructure
Implement strategy
Analyze & report on research findings
Re-evaluate strategy
Consult with stakeholders
Selecting CHAIN ParticipantsA 2-Step Process
Designed to enroll representative samples 1st step: random selection of service sites
from listing of all agencies serving HIV clients-- Medical and Social Service
-- All Boroughs (or Counties)
-- RW Funding vs. non RW
2nd step: agency staff help with random selection of clients-- Random selection from client rosters
-- Sequential enrollment
Recruiting CHAIN ParticipantsUnconnected to Care
NYC CHAIN includes small samples of PLWHA unconnected to care
Unconnected: Aware, no medical care, no case management for 6+months
• Referrals from CHAIN agency recruited participants
• Accompany Outreach Workers
• Open recruitment and screening in street and community settings
• 1994 (n=48) 1998 (n=24) 2002 (n=25)
NYC Persons Livingwith HIV,
as of 6/30/03 11
Ryan White CAREAct Encounters, 3/2001 - 2/2002 22
CHAIN 2002 Cohort
6/2002-6/2004
Female Male Female Male Female Male33
Total N 10,104(35%)
18,995(65%)
10,765(39%)
16,962(61%)
278(40%)
415(60%)
White 8% 30% 9% 8% 6% 10%
Black 58% 36% 53% 53% 62% 47%
Latino 31% 30% 37% 37% 31% 41%
Other 3% 4% 2% 2% <1% (1) 2%1 HIV Epidemiology Program DOHMH2 HIV CARE Services.
Comparison of CHAIN Participants with Surveillance & RW Encounter Data
Cohort composition closely tracks surveillance data/ RW client data
Collecting Information by Speaking with PLWHA
Comprehensive in-person 2hr+ interview Follow-up interviews approx. yearly Interviews in homes or agency settings Community-based interviewing team $35 incentive for every interview + referral
resource Strong community support with 80% - 90%
follow-up interview completion rate
Topics Covered Current health & mental health status Sociodemographic background Family life, housing, work, economic resources Sexual behaviors Outlook on life, stress, stigma Substance use behaviors History of medical and social services Utilization of medical and social services Medication use and adherence Service needs, satisfaction with services, barriers Social networks, social support Quality of life
Analyze & Report
Prepare data for analysis
Work with Council & staff to define topics
Consult with stakeholders
- What emerging issues should be investigated?
- What subgroup comparisons?
Prepare draft of reports and get feedback
Disseminate final reports
Some ways of classifying PLWH/A Gender
- Male / female / transgender Race / Ethnicity
- White / Black / Latino / Other HIV risk exposure group
- MSM / PDU / MSM + PDU / Hetero & Other Clinical indicators
- Viral load undetectable/ detectable Age
- 20-34 yrs old / 35-49 yrs / 50+ yrs Geography
- Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Queens, Staten Island
Types of Analyses
Descriptive (rates, percentages, trends, mapping)
Analytical
-- Are there group differences?
-- Do certain models of care, interventions, or policies make a difference?
Multivariate analyses – considering the effects of many factors taken together
Assessing the System of CareConduct studies to examine: Medical care, health, mental health, QOL outcomes
for PLWHA
Trend data – tracking change over time
Individual factors associated with outcomes
Service utilization associated with outcomes
Systemic factors associated with outcomes
Key resource for needs assessment – can show service system strengths and weaknesses
Outcome Measures
Appropriate medical care ARV and HAART utilization & adherence T-cell changes, viral load suppression Resolution of service need Health and mental health functioning Reduction of sex and drug risk behaviors Mortality
CHAIN Service Needs and Utilization: NYC Summary
NYCDOH took lead in defining revised set of service domains, needs and utilization measures
“Need” includes those currently using service
“Gap” = % without adequate service utilization among those with need for service
Minor differences in need definition between Tri-County and NYC
Compare 2006-2009 with earlier interview period 2001-2006
What is a Service Gap?
The difference between the “need” for service, and the receipt of service
Need may be “subjective,” in that client explicitly wants service (AKA “demand”) --Ex: “In the last 6 months, have you had a problem or
needed assistance with housing?”
Need may be “objective,” in that client’s circumstances suggest a need for a service, even if client doesn’t demand it -- Ex: Client has had at least one episode of homelessness,
being doubled up, or being unstably housed in past 6 mo.
Domain: Ambulatory Health CareService : HIV Primary Care
19
Trends in HIV Primary Care
Need for Service
Adequate Utilization
Always 100%
Domain: Ambulatory Health CareService : ARV Treatment Support
Trends in ARV Treatment Support
Need for Service Adequate Utilization
Domain: Case ManagementService : Social Service C.M.
Who Needs the Service?1. Poor mental health score on standardized measure2. In the last 6 months had an inpatient, emergency room or
mobile unit visit for psychiatric or mental health3. Being homeless or in unstable housing in the last 6 months4. During past year used cocaine, crack or heroin, OR5. During past 6 months heavy or problem drinking
Measure of Adequate UtilizationA case manager did one or more of the following in last 6 months:
-Revising or developing a plan for dealing with needs, -Referrals for social services,
-Help filling out forms for benefits or entitlements
Trends in Social Service C.M.
Need for Service Adequate Utilization
Domain: Case ManagementService : Medical C.M.
Who Needs the Service?1. No HIV primary care in the last 6 months
2. Stopped going or no visit to provider in the last 6 months
3. Missed more than one appointment in the last 6 months
4. No CD4 or VL test in the past 6 months, OR
5. Had any of the above problems at prior interviews AND had a case manager helped in getting or referring for medical services in the last 6 months
Measure of Adequate Utilization During the last 6 months a case manager helped in getting or referring for medical services
Trends in Medical C.M.
Need for Service Adequate Utilization
Domain: Mental HealthService : Professional Mental Health
Services Who Needs the Service? 1. Poor mental health score on standard measure 2. In the last 6 month had an inpatient, emergency room or mobile
unit visit for psychiatric or mental health, or3. In the last 6 months received counseling from a mental health
professional - psychiatrist, psychologist, therapist, or clinical social worker
Measure of Adequate Utilization
In the last 6 months received counseling from a mental health care professional or clinical social worker
Trends in Mental Health Services
Need for Service Adequate Utilization
Service: Alcohol or Drug Treatment
Trends in Alcohol or Drug TreatmentNeed for Service Adequate Utilization
Need Adequate Utilization HOUSING
Permanent Housing
(1) Homeless or unstably housed past six months OR (2) facing eviction or urgent need to move without resources to secure adequate housing past six months OR (3) received housing assistance past six months that resulted in resolution of need for permanent housing or great deal progress toward resolution
Received housing assistance past six months that resulted in resolution of need for permanent housing or great deal of progress toward resolution
FOOD
Food Services
(1) Did not have enough money in the household for food once in a while to very often in the last six months OR (2) went for a while day without anything to eat in the last 30 days OR (3) receiving food stamps OR (4) do not have unlimited access to a kitchen
Received one or more of the following services in the last six months: (1) Meals provided in a group setting, (2) prepared meals delivered to home, (3) received food voucher or food from a food pantry
Food and Housing ServicesNeed for Service Adequate Utilization
2006-2009
The Value of CHAIN
Patterns and proportions we see in the sample can be used as estimates for the broader HIV+ population
Over time data can show changes in needs as well as effects of services and system wide interventions
Provides broad range of evidence about service needs and outcomes from the point of view of persons living with HIV/AIDS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
A Technical Review Team (TRT) provides oversight for the CHAIN Project. In addition to Peter Messeri, PhD, Angela Aidala, PhD, Maria Caban, MA, Melissa White, MSSW, and Maiko Yomogida of Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health, TRT members include Mary Ann Chiasson, DrPH, (Chair), Roberta Scheinmann, MPH, Public Health Solutions, Inc.; Jan Carl Park, MPA, Nina Rothschild, DrPH, Office of AIDS Policy and Community Planning; Mary Irvine, DrPH, Yoran Grant, PhD MPH, Daniel Weglein, MD, and Fabienne Laraque, MD MPH, Office of Evaluation and Quality Assurance; Ellen Wiewel, PhD, HIV Epidemiology and Field Services Program and JoAnn Hilger, Director, Ryan White Services, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; Julie Lehane, PhD, and Tom Petro, Westchester County Department of Health;, and Gregory Cruz.
CHAIN reports are solely the responsibility of the researchers and do not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration, the City of New York, or Public Health Solutions.