compaction geotechnical engineering
DESCRIPTION
Notes on Compaction methods common in geotech engineeringTRANSCRIPT
1
Instructor: Dr. RICARDO ZAURIN
University of Central FloridaCivil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering
4
CompactionCompaction
2
What is compaction?What is compaction?
A simple ground improvementtechnique, where the soil is densifiedthrough external compactive effort.
A simple ground improvementtechnique, where the soil is densifiedthrough external compactive effort.
Soil CompactionSoil Compaction
Increase Unit WeightIncrease StrengthIncrease Bearing Capacity of
FoundationsReduces water seepage, swelling
and contraction.Reduce settlementsIncrease stability of embankments
Increase Unit WeightIncrease StrengthIncrease Bearing Capacity of
FoundationsReduces water seepage, swelling
and contraction.Reduce settlementsIncrease stability of embankments
3
Soil Compaction HOW?Soil Compaction HOW?
By removing trapped AirBy removing trapped Air
7
+ water =
Compactive effort
8
Compaction CurveWhen enough is enough?
Compaction CurveWhen enough is enough?
Water content
Dry
den
sity
( d
)
optimum water content (OMC)
d, max
Soil grains densely packed
- good strength and stiffness
- low permeability
4
9
Zero Air Void CurveZero Air Void Curve
All compaction points should lie to the left of ZAV curve
- corresponds to 100% saturation
Water content
Dry
den
sity
( d
)
Zero air void curve (S=100%)
S<100%S>100% (impossible)
10
Effect of Compactive EffortEffect of Compactive EffortIncreasing compactive effort results in:
E1
E2 (>E1)
Water content
Dry
den
sity
( d
)
E3
(>E2)
Lower optimum water content
Higher maximum dry density
5
12
Line of OptimumLine of Optimum
Water content
Dry
den
sity
( d
)
Compaction curves for different efforts
Line of optimum
Field CompactionField Compaction
Pneumatic rubber tired rollerPneumatic rubber tired roller
Different types of rollers
Vibratory roller Smooth-wheel roller
Sheepsfoot roller
6
14
Field CompactionField Compaction
Compacts effectively only to 200-300 mm; therefore, place the soil in shallow layers (lifts)
Smooth Wheeled Roller
15
Field CompactionField Compaction
for compacting very small areas
Vibrating Plates
effective for granular soils
7
16
Field CompactionField Compaction
Provides kneading action- 6 in layers
Sheepsfoot Roller
Very effective on clays
17
Field CompactionField Compaction
Provides deeper (2-3m) compaction.
Impact Roller
8
18
Principles of Geotechnical Engineering Braja M. Das
19
Principles of Geotechnical Engineering Braja M. Das
9
20
Compaction ControlCompaction Control-a systematic exercise where you check at regular intervals whether the compaction was done to specifications.
e.g., 1 test per 1000 m3 of
compacted soil
• Minimum dry density• Range of water content
Field measurements (of d) obtained using
• sand cone
• nuclear density meter
21
Laboratory Compaction TestLaboratory Compaction Test- to obtain the compaction curve and define the optimum water content and maximum dry density for aspecific compactive effort.
hammerStandard Proctor: Modified Proctor:
• 3 layers
• 25 blows per layer
• 5 layers
• 25 blows per layer
• 2.5 kg hammer
• 300 mm drop
• 4.54 kg hammer
• 450 mm drop
10
CE=Compaction Energy per unit volume(Compaction Effort)
23
11
24
There are correlations between OMC(w), CE, PL, and d for cohesive soils
25
Compaction Control TestCompaction Control Test
compacted ground
d,field = ?wfield = ?
Compaction specifications
Compare!
w
d
12
26
Compaction Control TestCompaction Control Test
1.- Sand Cone Method
2.- Rubber Balloon Method
3.- Nuclear Method
1.- Sand Cone Method
2.- Rubber Balloon Method
3.- Nuclear Method
Sand Cone MethodSand Cone Method
ASTM D-1556 Glass (or plastic) jar with a
metal cone Ottawa sand (known wt. &
vol.) Dig a hole – weigh the soil
and obtain w(%) Fill the hole with sand Determine the new wt. & vol. Eventually, d = (dry wt. of excavated
soil)/vol. of hole
ASTM D-1556 Glass (or plastic) jar with a
metal cone Ottawa sand (known wt. &
vol.) Dig a hole – weigh the soil
and obtain w(%) Fill the hole with sand Determine the new wt. & vol. Eventually, d = (dry wt. of excavated
soil)/vol. of hole
13
Sand Cone MethodSand Cone Method
Determine The combined Weight of Jar, Cone, and Sand (W1)
Determine the Weight of the Dry Soil W3=W2/(1+w)
In the Field, Excavate a Small Hole (Keep the Soil)
Moist Content (w)
Weight of Soil (W2)
Sand Cone MethodSand Cone Method
14
Close the Valve and Place the Jar Inverted. Open the Valve and Allow Sand to fill the Hole. Close the Valve
Determine the weight of the remaining sand +Jar+Cone (W4)
Weight of sand to fill the Hole + Cone (W5)
W5=W1-W4
After Hole has been excavated
Sand Cone MethodSand Cone Method
W5: Weight of sand to fill hole + cone
Wc: Weight of sand to fill the cone (From Lab Calibration
Dry unit weight of Ottawa sand used
Sand Cone MethodSand Cone Method
15
Rubber Balloon MethodRubber Balloon Method
ASTM D-2167
Similar to sand cone
Vol. is measured utilizing a
rubber balloon filled with
water
ASTM D-2167
Similar to sand cone
Vol. is measured utilizing a
rubber balloon filled with
water
Nuclear MethodNuclear Method
Emits gamma rays
Detects how the gamma
rays travel thru soil
Amounts of gamma rays
detected correlate with the
unit weight of soil
Emits gamma rays
Detects how the gamma
rays travel thru soil
Amounts of gamma rays
detected correlate with the
unit weight of soil
16
Specification for Field Compaction
Specification for Field Compaction
35
In most specifications for earthwork, the contractor is instructed to achieve a compacted field unit weight of 90% to 95% (up to 98%) of the maximum dry unit weight determined in the Laboratory
17
Special Compaction TechniquesSpecial Compaction Techniques
Dynamic
Vibroflotation
Blasting
Dynamic
Vibroflotation
Blasting
Dynamic CompactionDynamic Compaction- pounding the ground by a heavy weight
Suitable for granular soils, land fills and karst terrain with sink holes.
Crater created by the impact
Pounder (Tamper)
solution cavities in limestone
(to be backfilled)
18
Dynamic CompactionDynamic Compaction
Pounder (Tamper)Weight (Wh)= 80-360kN (18-80kip)Drop(h) = 7.5-30.5 m (25-100ft)
D=Depth of densification
Dynamic CompactionDynamic Compaction
19
Important Dynamic Compaction Construction Conditions:
Minimum 100-150 ft clearance from any structure. Review site for vibration sensitivity.
Dynamic Compaction Acceptance Testing:
Large-Scale Load Test . Standard Penetration Test (SPT). Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT). Pressuremeter Test (PMT). Dilatometer Test (DMT). Shear-Wave Velocity Profile.
Important Dynamic Compaction Construction Conditions:
Minimum 100-150 ft clearance from any structure. Review site for vibration sensitivity.
Dynamic Compaction Acceptance Testing:
Large-Scale Load Test . Standard Penetration Test (SPT). Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT). Pressuremeter Test (PMT). Dilatometer Test (DMT). Shear-Wave Velocity Profile.
Vibro-CompactionKnown as “VibroFlotation“.Is used to densify clean,
cohesionless soils.The action of the vibrator, usually
accompanied by water jetting. Allowing them to move into a
denser configuration, typically achieving a relative density of 70 to 85 percent.
Known as “VibroFlotation“.Is used to densify clean,
cohesionless soils.The action of the vibrator, usually
accompanied by water jetting. Allowing them to move into a
denser configuration, typically achieving a relative density of 70 to 85 percent.
20
Expected Vibro-Compaction Results:Expected Vibro-Compaction Results:
Relative EffectivenessGround Type
ExcellentSands
Marginal to GoodSilty Sands
PoorSilts
Not applicableClays
VibroflotationVibroflotation
Vibroflot (vibrating unit)Length = 2 – 3 mDiameter = 0.3 – 0.5 mMass = 2 tons
Practiced in several forms:
vibro–compaction
stone columns
vibro-replacement
Suitable for granular soils
(lowered into the ground and vibrated)
21
VibroflotationVibroflotation
VibroflotationVibroflotation
22
VibroflotationVibroflotation
VibroflotationVibroflotation
23
49
Stone ColumnsStone Columns
vibrator makes a hole in the weak ground
hole backfilled ..and compacted Densely compacted stone column
VibroflotationVibroflotation
24
Typical Patterns for Vibroflot ProbesTypical Patterns for Vibroflot Probes
51
Effective Range of Soil for VibroflotationEffective Range of Soil for Vibroflotation
52
Zone 1 - Most Suitable
Zone 2 – Lower limit for effectiveness For finer soils considerable effort has to be used
Zone 3 - Too much gravel. Rate of Probe penetration my be slow and uneconomical.
25
Grain Size Distribution of the Backfill Material for Vibroflotation
Grain Size Distribution of the Backfill Material for Vibroflotation
53
Range of SN Rating as Backfill
0-10 Excellent
10-20 Good
20-30 Fair
30-50 Poor
>50 Unsuitable Brown(1977)
BlastingBlasting
Aftermath of blasting
For densifying granular soils
26
Blasting
Blasting is the process of detonating small charges within loose cohesion less soils for the purpose of densification.
Blasting is the process of detonating small charges within loose cohesion less soils for the purpose of densification.
Expected Soil Behavior with Blasting:
Immediate and long-term surface settlement.
Settlement can be 2-10 percent of treated strata thickness.
Penetration resistance will increase slowly with time for several weeks.
Dense zones may be loosened during blasting.
Expected Soil Behavior with Blasting:
Immediate and long-term surface settlement.
Settlement can be 2-10 percent of treated strata thickness.
Penetration resistance will increase slowly with time for several weeks.
Dense zones may be loosened during blasting.
27
Design Considerations:
Charges should be placed at approximately 1/2-3/4 of desired depth of compaction.
Spacing of detonation holes should be between 5-15 m.
Successive coverage's are separated by hours or days.
Individual charge 1-12 kg, the amount of total explosive is 89-150 g/m^3 of treated soil.
Soil closest to the surface will be poorly compacted and may need compaction by another method or removal.
The compaction resulting from blasting is a function of the initial relative density.
Design Considerations:
Charges should be placed at approximately 1/2-3/4 of desired depth of compaction.
Spacing of detonation holes should be between 5-15 m.
Successive coverage's are separated by hours or days.
Individual charge 1-12 kg, the amount of total explosive is 89-150 g/m^3 of treated soil.
Soil closest to the surface will be poorly compacted and may need compaction by another method or removal.
The compaction resulting from blasting is a function of the initial relative density.
28
59
Earthmoving EquipmentEarthmoving Equipment
Grader for spreading soil
This self-loading scraper is equipped with mixers inside its bucket. It scrapes up mixes it within its bucket, and then spreads it back over the ground surface.
29
61
Earthmoving EquipmentEarthmoving Equipment
Bulldozer
62
Earthmoving EquipmentEarthmoving Equipment
Backhoe
30
63
Earthmoving EquipmentEarthmoving Equipment
Rock Breaker
CompactionCompaction
64
ExamplesExamples
31
Proctor Test ExampleProctor Test ExampleFor the following Standard Proctor Test data
– Plot the compaction curve
– Obtain the Maximum Dry Density and the OMC
Plot the ZAV curve if Gs=2.75
For the following Standard Proctor Test data– Plot the compaction curve
– Obtain the Maximum Dry Density and the OMC
Plot the ZAV curve if Gs=2.75
65
66
Proctor Test ExampleProctor Test Example
We need Moist Content and Dry densityWe need Moist Content and Dry density
(1) (2) (3) (4)(5)
(2)-(3)(6)
(3)-(1)(5)/(6)
32
67
Proctor Test ExampleProctor Test Example
We need Moist Content and Dry densityWe need Moist Content and Dry density
68
Proctor Test Example ZAVProctor Test Example ZAV
Assigned Values
105.00
107.00
109.00
111.00
113.00
115.00
117.00
119.00
121.00
123.00
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00
Gam
ma
Dry
(lb/
ft3)
Moist Content (%)
Compaction Curve
Compaction Curve
ZAV Curve
33
69
Proctor Test ExampleProctor Test Example
Next LectureNext Lecture
Revision for Test 1Revision for Test 1
70