companies act 2013 vs companies act 1956

58
Companies Act 2013 - A comparison with the Companies Act, 1956 Presentation by- Manoj Kumar E: [email protected] M: +919910688433 Corporate Professionals D-28, South Ex., Part-I New Delhi 110049 (India)

Upload: corporate-professionals

Post on 14-Jul-2015

50.615 views

Category:

Investor Relations


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Companies Act 2013- A comparison with the Companies Act, 1956

Presentation by-

Manoj Kumar

E: [email protected]

M: +919910688433

Corporate Professionals

D-28, South Ex., Part-I

New Delhi 110049 (India)

Page 2: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

History

The Companies Act, 1956 is

an act of Parliament that

was enacted in 1956

The Companies Act, 2013 was recently

passed by Rajya Sabha on 8th August

2013 and has received Presidential

assent on 29th August 2013.

Page 3: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

An Overview

Companies Act, 1956 Companies Act, 2013

The Companies Act has a substantial part of the law prescribed

within itself

The Companies Act gives substantial powers to the Government &

hence major prescriptions would be in the form of Rules to be

notified separately

Page 4: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Companies Act 1956

vs.

Companies Act 2013

Page 6: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

THE COMPANIES Act, 2013:

The Companies Act, 1956 was however enacted on 1st April,

1956 in its entirety

The Preliminary Provisions

Page 7: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Introduction of new definitions

in the Act which were not

existing under the Companies

Act 1956

Key

Managerial

Personnel

Associate

Company

Auditing

Standards

CEO & CFO

Independent

DirectorPromoter

Global

Depository

Receipt

Related Party

Small

Company

The Preliminary Provisions

Page 8: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Earlier excluded, Corporation

sole has now been covered in the

definition of body Corporate

The term “Listed Company”

now includes all companies

listed on a Stock Exchange

Subsidiary of a Public Co. shall

be deemed to be a Public Co.

even if it is a Private Co. by its

Articles

The definition of Employee

stock Option now covers

Directors, officers & employees

of Holding & subsidiaries also

The scope of “Officer in default”

has been widened to include

Registrars, Merchant Bankers

related to the issue

Only “Apr-Mar” to be a

Financial Year(exceptions: Foreign

Holding/ Subsidiary subject to

tribunal’s approval)

The Preliminary Provisions

Page 9: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Incorporation and Matters Incidental

Page 10: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Introduction of concept of

One Person Company

No approval required for

conversion of Private

Company to One Person

Company or vice versa

No approval required for

conversion of Private

Company into Public

Company

Changes - Incorporation

Page 11: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

MOA to carry the main objects

only. Bifurcation of the Objects

clause into main, ancillary &

other objects has been done away

with.

Even the Private Companies

have to file the declarations for

Commencement of Business

Subsidiary can hold shares in

Holding Company as trustee,

which is not allowed under the

Companies Act 1956

Changes - Incorporation

Page 12: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Incorporation

Penalizing Provisions

ROC empowered to strike off the name of a

Company incorporated with wrong/incorrect

information

Person deliberately furnishing any

false/incorrect information at the time of

incorporation shall be responsible for fraud

under section 447 & stringent punishment

Any person can challenge the validity of

incorporation before the tribunal in case of such

a Company

Page 13: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Prospectus & Allotment of Securities

Page 14: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Now Company after varying the terms of contract or objects

mentioned in the prospectus cannot use amount raised by it

through Prospectus for buying/ trading/ otherwise dealing

in Equity shares of other Company

Changes - Prospectus & Allotment of Securities

Scope widened to include

all type of securities than

just shares

Specification for raising of

funds by Public Company

through:

1. IPO/FPO

2. Private Placement

3. Rights/ Bonus Shares

Page 15: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFER

CONDITIONS

Offer to section of public

other than QIBs

Not more than 50 number

of people

In compliance of

prescribed terms &

conditions

Made through Private

Placement offer letter and

not Prospectus

Conditions

fulfilled?

YES NO

PUBLIC OFFER

Comply with provisions of Act,

Securities Contract Regulation

Act, 1956 and SEBI Act, 1992

The Act defines the term Private Placement:

Changes - Prospectus & Allotment of Securities

Page 16: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Now Any person affected by misleading

statement, any inclusion/omission of a

matter in the prospectus can file suit/ take

an action :

Person responsible for fraudulently

inducing others to invest money now liable

for stringent punishment for fraud under

section 447 which shall be non-

compoundable

For civil liability for misstatement in

Prospectus

For punishment for fraudulently inducing

persons to invest money

Changes - Prospectus & Allotment of Securities

Page 17: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Power of SEBI to administer provisions related to listed

Company or Company going to be listed widened to include:1. Kind of Share Capital to be issued

2. Nature of Shares/Debentures

3. Voting Right

4. Variation of Shareholders’ Rights

5. Further Issue of Capital

In Companies Act, 1956, only Public Financial Institutions, Public

sector Banks or Scheduled Banks with main object as “financing”

were allowed to issue Shelf Prospectus

Changes - Prospectus & Allotment of Securities

Page 18: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Penalizing Provisions

Persons authorizing the issue of the

prospectus having misleading information

shall also be criminally liable besides

holding the civil liability

Civil liability for misstatement in

prospectus has been extended to experts

also

Changes - Prospectus & Allotment of Securities

Page 20: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

General Changes - Share Capital & Debentures

Various changes in respect to Shares & Securities

Changes with respect to VOTING RIGHTS

Changes with respect to ISSUE OF SHARES

Various changes in respect to Shares & Securities

GENERAL CHANGES

Page 21: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

General Changes - Share Capital & Debentures

Various changes in respect to Shares & SecuritiesCOVERAGE OF

Act seeks to regulate all

type of Securities as

opposed to Equity and

Debentures only

Page 22: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

General Changes - Share Capital & Debentures

NEW VARIATIONS IN

Company can issue shares

with

as to other

things also

Page 23: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Voting Right Changes

Equitable Voting rights for

Equity and Preference share

holders with respect to their paid

up capital

For vote on resolutions

affecting rights of both

categories

Preference shareholders allowed

to vote on every resolution

placed before shareholders’

meeting

If dividend payable to any

class of preference

shareholders in arrear for

more than 2 years

No classification between

cumulative and

non-cumulative preference

shares

For identification of voting

rights

Page 24: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

General Changes - Share Capital & Debentures

Various changes in respect to Shares & SecuritiesVarious changes in respect to Shares & Securities

GENERAL CHANGES

Changes with respect to

VOTING RIGHTS

Changes with respect to

ISSUE OF SHARES

Page 25: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Issue of Shares

Private Companies also to comply

with the provisions of further issue of

shares, which were applicable to

Public Companies only

New provision for allotment of ESOP, rules

will be provided soon

Page 26: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Share Capital & Debentures

No other shares except

to

be issued at discount

No provision has been made for issue of shares on discount with the

approval of Central Government

Page 27: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

General Changes - Share Capital & Debentures

PROHIBITION ON

Prohibition on Bonus Issue if the

Company has defaulted in

payment of:

Interest/ Principal in respect of

Fixed Deposits or Debt

Securities issued by it

Statutory dues of employees

such as contribution to

provident fund, gratuity , Bonus

Page 28: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Share Capital & Debentures

No reduction in Capital allowed if the

Company is in arrears for payments of

deposits, accepted either before or after the

Commencement of Act

Page 30: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Acceptance of Deposits

NBFCs will be governed only by the rules issued by

the Reserve Bank of India

Deposits from persons other than members not

allowed

Shareholders’ approval required for accepting

deposits from members

The concept of Small Depositors done away with

Page 32: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes – Registration of Charges

Whether created within or outside India

1. On property, or

2. On assets, or

3. On any undertaking whether tangible/otherwise

4. Whether situated within/outside India

Under The Companies Act, 1956, specific events are provided when the

charge has to be registered

Page 34: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

The new law brings about changes in respect of

some very important components of a Company

DIRECTORS & KEY

MANAGERIAL

PERSONS

SHAREHOLDERS’

MEEETING

BOARD

MEEETING

Requirement for

appointment

Maximum number

Condition for

Removal

Extended Duties

Quorum

Postal Ballot

Notice

Participation of

Directors

Number & Timing

Changes - Management & Meetings

Page 35: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Management & Meetings

A prescribed class of Companies will be required to have:

Managing Director/ CEO/ Manager

Whole Time Director in the absence of

MD/CEO/Manager

Company Secretary

A mandatory requirement to appoint such persons will ensure proper

Governance of the Company

DIRECTOR’S

Page 36: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

A Company can have maximum 15 Directors at Board instead of

earlier 12 directors

Central Government’s approval for increase in number

of directors has been dispensed with

DIRECTORS

Changes - Management & Meetings

Page 37: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Only prescribed number of members can pass a resolution for removal

of a Director in the following cases

A great relief to Company from frivolous application for removal of directors

by small shareholders holding 1 share only

DIRECTORS

Company with Share

Capital Other Company

Members holding 1/10th of

the voting power

Members holding shares valued

at an aggregate of Rs. 5 lakh or

more

Changes - Management & Meetings

Page 38: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

DUTIES OF A DIRECTOR

To not assign his office (any such assignment will be void)

To act in accordance to the Articles of Association

To act in good faith in order to promote the objects of the Company in the

best interests of its members, shareholders, employees, community and

environment

To exercise duties with due and reasonable care, skill and diligence

To not involve in a situation in which he may have a direct/ indirect interest

that conflicts or may conflict with the interest of the Company

To not achieve or attempt to achieve any undue gain or advantage to

himself or his relatives/ partners or associates

Changes - Management & Meetings

Page 39: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Bring accountability in the

functioning of Director

Ease of finding the case of

negligence by directors

EXPRESS DUTIES OF DIRECTORS

Changes - Management & Meetings

Page 40: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Shareholders Meeting

Changes - Management & Meetings

Page 41: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Management & Meetings

QUORUM shall now be considered as:

QUORUM

(No. of Members

personally Present)

NUMBER OF MEMBERS AS ON

THE DATE OF MEETING

5 ≤ 1000

15 1000 < number ≤ 5000

30 ≥ 5000

Fixing of a higher quorum as compared to the earlier requirement

will ensure greater participation by shareholders

Page 42: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Board Meeting

Changes - Management & Meetings

Page 43: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Management & Meetings

SOME NEW PROVISIONS

Notice of the

Meeting

Minimum 7 days

Notice

To be given to all

directors whether or

not in India

Can be sent through

any means; hand

delivery, post or e-

form

Participation

of Directors

In person, or

By video

conferencing, or

Any other audio-

visual means capable

of recording,

recognizing and

storing the

participation of

director with date &

time

Number & Timing

of Meetings

At least 4 meetings in

a year

Not necessary to be

held in every quarter

Time gap of not

more than 120 days

between 2 meetings

1 2 3

Meeting at shorter notice allowed subject to attendance by at least 1 Independent director

or subsequent ratification of decision by all directors

Page 45: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Audit & Auditors

Listed & other prescribed companies shall not

appoint or reappoint:

An individual auditor for more than 1 term of 5

consecutive years

An auditor firm for more than 2 terms of 5 consecutive

years

A gap of at least 5 years should elapse after

completion of the aforesaid term before the same

auditor can be reappointed

A period of 3 years available as a transition period for compliance after

enactment of this law

Page 46: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Audit & Auditors

Auditor shall not provide the following services

whether directly/ indirectly to Company and its

Holding & subsidiary Companies:

Design & Implementation of Financial

Information systemAccounting & book Keeping Services

Internal Audit Actuarial Services

Investment Banking & Advisory Management Services

Page 48: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Payment of Dividend

No dividend shall be declared or paid by a

Company from its reserves other than free

reserves.

Page 50: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Restructuring & Revival

Sick Company

Fast Track

Merger

Compromise or

Arrangement

Reduction of

Capital

Page 51: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Restructuring & Revival

Reduction of Capital

accounting treatment

proposed by the Company for

such reduction is in conformity

with the accounting standards

if the

Company is in arrears for

payment of deposits

Page 52: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Restructuring & Revival

Compromise or Arrangement

Notice of any meeting in this matter

also to be given to Central

Government, Income Tax Authorities,

Reserve Bank of India, SEBI and

CCI

Calling of meeting of members or

creditors now mandatory (after

consent received by postal ballot) for

approval of compromise by persons

representing at least 3/4th of the

value of members of creditors

Page 53: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Restructuring & Revival

Compromise or Arrangement

Abolition of Treasury Stocks

Any shares arising out of

arrangement or compromise to be

cancelled and extinguished and

not to be held by the Transferee

Company in its own or a Trust’s

name whether on its behalf or on

behalf of a subsidiary/associate

Company

Page 54: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Restructuring & Revival

Fast Track Merger

for merger between 2 small Companies or

a holding and its wholly owned subsidiary and some other class of

Companies

to approve & effect the scheme if

no objections by Official Liquidator and the Registrar to the scheme

Page 55: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Restructuring & Revival

Fast Track Merger

between Indian Companies and Foreign

Companies incorporated in prescribed jurisdictions

and the scheme must provide for

payment to shareholders of the merging Company in any combination of

cash and IDRs

Page 56: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Restructuring & Revival

Sick Company

: Any Company can be declared as a Sick Company and not

necessarily an Industrial Unit

Criteria of 50% Net Worth erosion dispensed with

A Company unable to repay 50% or more of secured debts within 30 days

of notice served by the Creditors can be declared sick on application

moved by:

The Company itself, OR

The Creditors representing 50% or more of secured debts

Page 57: Companies Act 2013 vs Companies Act 1956

Changes - Restructuring & Revival

“ It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor

the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to

change. ”

Charles Darwin

011-40622214/+91- 981027551 [email protected]