comparative aspects of metamorphosis in …...comparative aspects of metamorphosis in f ejervarya...

24
COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor of Science with Honours P979 (Animal Resource Science and Management) 2007 2007

Upload: others

Post on 28-Feb-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND

Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA)

Poi Yong Min

OL 667 Bachelor of Science with Honours P979 (Animal Resource Science and Management) 2007 2007

Page 2: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

ru' t Khidmat Mak'umat Akadel P.KHIOMAT MAKLUMAT AKAOEMIK UN sin MALAYSIA SARAW~

UNIMAI Q.4~l() KOUl Samarahaa

11111111111111111111 11111 1000203614

COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN Fejervarya limnocharis AND

Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA)

PUI YONG MIN

This project is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours

(Animal Resource Science and Management)

Department ofZoology

Faculty Resource Science and Teclmology

UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARA W AK

2007

Page 3: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

DECLARATION

No portion of the work referred to in this dissertation has been submitted in support of an application for another degree ofqualification of this or any other university or institution ofhigher learning.

Pui Yong Min

Animal Resource Science and Management Program Department ofZoology Faculty ofResource Science and Technology Universiti Malaysia Sarawak

Page 4: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

,..

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

First of all, thanks and praise to God for all the blessing. Deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Indraneil Das for his guidance and support in completing this project. Not to be forgotten all the Lecturers for their help. Special thanks to my lovely family for their moral and financial support. Also thanks to all the lab assistants, postgraduate students, my course mates and all those who had helped me. I really appreciated all the help with my heart.

Page 5: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

,... f".ot Khidmal Makfumat Akademll YNIVARSITI MALAYSIA SARAWA¥­

~'OOKOUl~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

ACKNOWLEGEMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS 11

LIST OF TABLES iii

LIST OF FIGURES IV

ABSTRACT

1.0 INTRODUCTION 2

2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW 5

3.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS 8

4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

4.1 Egg clutches 13

4.2 Metamorphosis ofFejervarya limnocharis 14

4.2.1 Description of Fejervarya limnocharis tadpole 15

4.2.2 Metamorphosis stages description of Fejervarya limnocharis 17

4.3 Metamorphosis ofFejervarya cancrivora 22

4.3.1 Description ofFejervarya cancrivora tadpole 23

4.3.2 Metamorphosis stages description of Fejervarya cancrivora 25

4.4 Tail shape and pattern comparison 31

4.5 Oral disc comparison 32

4.6 Species identification 33

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 34

6.0 REFERENCES 35

7.0 APPENDIX 38

11

Page 6: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

....

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

LIST OF TABLES

Comparison ofegg clutches sizes of Fejervarya limnocharis and

Fejervarya cancrivora

Snout-vent length (SVL) and total length (TL) of Fejervarya

limnocharis (Stage 25-42)

Duration of metamorphosis in Fejervarya cancrivora tadpole

(Stage 19-29)

Snout-vent length (SVL) and total length (TL) ofFejervarya

cancrivora tadpoles in 10 different metamorphosis stages (Stage

19-29)

Page

13

21

23

30

III

Page 7: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

I

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

LIST OF FIGURES

Page

Figure Schematic diagram of a generalized anuran larva 11

Figure Gosner (1960) stages table 12

Figure Mean of total length CrL) and Snout-vent length (SVL) 14 change over stages development in Fejervarya limnocharis

Figure Stage 37 of Fejervarya limnocharis 16

Figure Stage 29 ofFejervarya limnocharis 17

Figure Stage 31 of Fejervarya limnocharis 17

Figure Stage 35 ofFejervarya limnocharis 18

Figure Stage 40 ofFejervarya limnocharis 18

Figure Stage 41 ofFejervarya limnocharis 19

Figure Stage 42 of Fejervarya limnocharis 19

Figure Stage 43 of Fejervarya limnocharis 20

Figure Stage 28 ofFejervarya cancrivora 24

Figure Stage 19 ofFejervarya cancrivora 25

Figure Stage 21 of Fejervarya cancrivora 25

Figure Stage 22 ofFejervarya cancrivora 26

Figure Stage 23 ofFejervarya cancrivora 26

Figure Stage 24 of Fejervarya cancrivora 26

Figure Stage 25 ofFejervarya cancrivora 27

Figure Stage 26 ofFejervarya cancrivora 27

Figure Stage 27 ofFejervarya cancrivora 27

Figure Stage 28 of Fejervarya cancrivora 28

Figure Stage 29 of Fejervarya cancrivora 28

Figure Stage 30 ofFejervarya cancrivora 29

Figure Stage 31 ofFejervarya cancrivora 29

Figure Tail shape and pattern comparison 31

Figure Oral disc comparison of the Fejervarya limnocharis and 32

Fejervarya cancrivora

IV

Page 8: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

,....

Comparative aspects of metamorphosis in Fejervarya limnocharis and

Fejervarya cancrivora (Amphibia: Anura)

Pui YongMin

Animal Resource Science and Management Department of Zoology

Faculty of Resource Science and Technology Universiti Malaysia Sarawak

ABSTRACT The metamorphosis of Fejervarya limnocharis and Fejervarya cancrivora larvae was studied in the laboratory. The larvae of both Fejervmya species were grown under several control environments: the water temperature was in the range 22-25°C and one individual per receptacle. This study found that F. limnocharis took 52 days to reach Stage 43 (n = 2). Survivor rate was 33% with heavy mortality in the later stages (Stage 35 and above). SVL reached optimum growth at Stage 40, whereas tail length has reached optimum development and become fully elongated at Stage 41 and started to resorb from Stage 42 onwards. Fejervmya cancrivora larvae took 31 days to reach Stage 29 (n = 3). The longest duration of metamorphosis was observed in Stage 25, which took 11 days before preceding to Stage 26, from which stage, the metamorphosis day length decreased. Late stages of larvae of the two Fejervarya species can be distinguished based on tail shape and pattern, oral disc features and body size.

Keywords: Fejervarya limnocharis, Fejervarya cancrivora, tadpole, metamorphosis, optimum growth

ABSTRAK MetOmOIfosis berudu Fejervarya limnocharis dan Fejervarya cancrivora telah dikaji di makmal. Kedua-dua berudu spesies Fejervarya diperlihara di bawah persekitaran terkawalan; suhu air adalah pada julat 22­25°C dan satu individu per cawan. Kajian ini mendapati F. limnocharis memerlukan 52 hari untuk mencapai Peringkat 43 (n = 2). Kadar kemandirian adalah 33% dan kebanyakan berudu mati pada peringakat akhir pertubuhan (peringkat 35 ke atas). SVL mencapai peringkat pertumbuhan optimum pada Peringkat 40 manakala, pertumbuhan ekor mencapai peringkat pertubuhan dan pemajangan optimum pada peringkat pertubuhan 41 dan ekor mula memendek pada Peringkat 42 ke atas. Berudu F. cancrivora memer/ukan 31 hari IIntuk mencapai Peringkat 29 (n = 3). Jangka masa metamoifosis yang paling lama diperlrolikan pada Peringkat 25, dimana memerlukan 11 hari sebelum ke Peringakat 26 dan masa metomoifosis menurun selepas itu. Kedua-dua spesies dapat dibezakan berdasarkan bentuk dan corak ekOl~ ciri-Ciri mulut dan saiz badan.

Kata kunci: Fejervarya limnocharis, Fejervarya cancrivora, berudu, metamOifosis, pertumbuhan optimum

Page 9: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

,....

1.0 INTRODUCTION

There are six families of anuran in Borneo, namely Bombinatoridae, Megophryidae,

Bufonidae, Microhylidae, Ranidae and Rhacophoridae (Inger and Stuebing, 1997). A total

of 186 species of amphibians have been recorded from Malaysia (Inger and Stuebing,

1997; Das, 2002). At present, 155 species can be found in Borneo, of which 94 are

endemic to Borneo (Inger and Stuebing, 1989).

Inger (1985) reported that 63 species of tadpoles were known from Borneo, representing

between 45-60% of the total anuran fauna in addition to larval forms that could not be

assigned to species, while some have not been recognized or discovered. A more recent

study by Das and Haas (2005) reported that 89 species (56%) ofanuran from Borneo have

known tadpoles.

In general, a typical tadpole can be described as a sac of gut with mouth and eyes at one

end and a muscular tail at the end; limbs does not appear until late in the developmental

process and only the hind limbs are visible externally. The body is short, about 25%-35%

of the total body length. Head-body length in the late stages ranges from 3-36 mm, and

denticle row counts are from 0/0-11/5 (Inger, 1985). The body form in anuran tadpoles

shows great diversity. Each of this modification is specific and enables them to adapt to

their habitat and feeding behaviours (Zug, 1993).

Metamorphosis is known to occur in the major living chordate group except in amniotes.

The term "metamorphosis" refers to any morphological, biochemical, and physiological

nonrecurring changes that occur during the entire larval life span (Just et aI., 1981).

2

Page 10: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

"Pre-metamorphosis" refers to the stages that are independent of the hormone function

for the growth (Fox, 1984); the tenn "pro-metamorphosis" should be applied to stages that

are dependent on thyroid hormone function and the tenn "climax" should be used only to

refer to the event that require tremendous surge of thyroid hormones in the late larval state

that is dependent on a pituitary-hypothalamus axis function. Fox (1984) explained the

term metamorphosis basically only referring to the biochemical changes in the

metamorphosis development of tadpole.

Accord ing to Tayor and Kollros (1946), during pre-metamorphosis, the larva grows but

there is little change in its external morphology; during pro-metamorphosis, the hind legs

grow extensively and at end of this period, the anal canal piece is resorted; in the climax

period, the horny beaks disappear and the mouth part is transfonned progressively.

There are three major type of changes associated in anuran metamorphosis: regression of

particular tissue or body organs that have specific functions only during the larvae form;

remodelling of larvae organs to their adult forms that are suitable for function in the adult;

development of organ or tissue that function in adult but are not required for the larvae

stages (Yun, 1999).

The timing for completion of metamorphosis is variable within and also among species

and this differentiation responds to particular environmental effects (temperature, density

and food source) within their habitat (Zug, 1993).

3

Page 11: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

There is a lack of knowledge on the metamorphosis of Fejervarya limnocharis and

Fejervarya cancrivora tadpoles in Borneo. A study by Roy and Khare (1978) from India

provided the developmental table of F. limnocharis and described the development from

egg to metamorphosis in 32 different stages based on significant morphological changes.

A similar study by Sahu and Khare (1980) described F. limnocharis tadpoles in Shillong

and neighbouring north-eastern hills of India. However, no data are available for south­

east Asia and Borneo, although these frogs are members of a species-complex, and the

Bomean population is believed to be non-conspecific with those from areas further north.

In order to obtain new knowledge on the metamorphosis of Fejervarya limnocharis and

Fejervarya cancrivora, the aim of this study was to observe the developmental stages of

metamorphosis and to study the morphological differences between the larvae of these

two species.

4

Page 12: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW

Fejervarya limnocharis and Fejervarya cancrivora belong to the Order Anura within the

Family of Ranidae. Inger and Voris (2001) placed both these species in the genus

Fejervarya, along with Fejervarya raja.

The species F. limnocharis was originally established as a subgenus under Rana by

Bolkay (1915) and as Limnonectes by Dubois (1992) and Iskandar (1998). F. limnocharis

is a small semi-aquatic frog: males show the range 32-50 mm; female 49-58 mm (Inger

and Stuebing, 1989). Some individuals bear a prominent pale mid-dorsal stripe band on

the back. They have pointed toes and fingers, toes are half webbed and webbing does not

appear on fingers (Daniels, 2005).

Fejervarya limnocharis can be found in disturbed habitats and are thus associated with

human activities (Inger and Stuebing, 1989). A recent study by Omar (2005) found F.

limnochari to be abundant in the UNIMAS Temporary Campus.

The eggs can be collected from shallow rain-filled pools in open areas (Daniel, 2005;

Tingsom, 2005). According to Daniel (2005), the eggs of F. limnocharis are floating

masses that appear as black spots with a clear jelly and the eggs mass may contain as

many as 1,000 eggs. Roy and Khare (1978) reported that F. limnocharis larvae hatched on

the 5th or 6th day and complete metamorphosis on 33 rd to 36th day in the laboratory with

the temperature range 11.3°C at night and 20.5°C by day.

5

Page 13: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

,.

Fejervarya limnocharis tadpoles can be recognized by the presence of an olive body and

tail, with black and brown speck lings, posterior half 0 f tail dark grey to blackish (Daniels,

2005; Leong, 2005). According to Leong (2005) the oral disc of F. limnocharis is with

rounded anterior labium with 7-20 papillae and the first labial tooth row of the anterior

and posterior labia, respectively and always undivided.

Fejervarya cancrivora larvae are dark grey to chocolate brown colour on their back and

flanks. Tail muscle with darker spots extending onto fins and venters are lightly coloured.

Oral disc located ventrally under the body with L TRF is 2(2)/3, P-3 length is 2/3 and P-2

is 3/4. Lower lip and lateral comer of the upper lip is bordering by marginal papillae.

Narrow median gap exist at lower lips and jaw sheaths is serrate (Leong, 2005).

Metamorphoses of the anurans are regulated by their environmental factors; these factors

include temperature, water availability, crowding, light, diet and environmental iodine

level (Dodd and Dodd, 1976). Recent studies by Barnett and Richardson (2002) found

that in Rana pretiosa, metamorphosis was longer in high density treatments compared to

low density in presence of the predators.

Ryan and Winnie (2000) reported that the hydro period experiments on Rana

sphenocepha/a tadpoles had a significant effect on the larvae metamorphosis

development. Yun (2000) found that Rana tadpoles can respond to pond drying by

reducing the length of their metamorphosis timing. Loman (2001) stated that in ponds, the

metamorphosis was later in cold summer than in warm summers and the size at

6

1

Page 14: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

metamorphosis also affected by tadpole density; at high densities, the metamorphoses

were shorter.

Tadpoles are difficult to identify and stage because they go through many different stages

in their life time. Yun (2000) stated that there are many different methods to stage anurans

during metamorphosis, including those described by Tayor and Kollros (1946) and Just et

al. (1981). Each of these methods has different techniques ofstaging.

7

Page 15: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

3.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eggs and tadpoles of the two study species were collected and studied between July 2006

to March 2007 in Universiti Malaysia Sarawak New Campus (01 ° 27' 34.2" N; 110° 27'

25.9" E). The elevation was 9 m while the maximum relative humidity was about 90.6%

and the average temperature about 27.7°C. The habitat was the rain-filled pond and drains

that are present around the construction sites at the new campus areas. Most of the drains

were about 30 em deep and had a diameter of at least 1.5 m. The bottoms of the drain

were covered with thick layer ofmud and drain sites were surrounded by grass.

A total of two egg clutches were collected at drains within the study sites in December

2006 and January 2007. Both egg clutches were floated in the water surface, covered with

jelly-like white transparent mucus. These clutches represented the eggs ofF. limnocharis

and F. cancrivora. The egg clutch ofF. limnocharis consisted of 140 eggs and while that

F. cancrivora consisted of 870 eggs.

Tadpole specimens were caught usmg vanous types of dip nets based on the sites

conditions and water depth. All specimens were placed in small container containing

original water and soil and were taken to laboratory for rearing and staging. Beachy et at.

(1999) stated that the water and soil that were taken from the place of collection is

suitable for tadpole growth, because it may contain micronutrients. Tap water that had

been treated with anti-chlorine was also used as water sources for rearing tadpoles.

8

Page 16: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

In the laboratory, tadpoles were placed in small plastic cups (one individual per

receptacle) with six replicates. The larvae and eggs were grown in controlled condition;

average water temperature was within the range 25-27°C, each receptacle had 8 cm deep

water and other tadpole care parameter were according to Katzman et at. (2003). Each

plastic cups contained a thin layer of field soil with some rocks and were placed next to

each other and situated close to the window to provide the same temperature and natural

light condition. This is to avoid the influence of temperature during the experiment.

During the experiment, the tadpoles were fed with flaked fish food and boiled egg yolk.

Feed was provided daily and any food that had not been eaten in 10 minutes were

removed for maintenance ofwater quality. Once a week 10-25% of total volume of water

was changed (Daniels, 2005).

Drawings and measurements are based on the observation under a stereoscopic and

compound microscope. In order to assess the morphological variability, measurement of

the total length and snout-vent length were taken using digital callipers. Total length (TL)

was measured from the tip of the snout to the end of the tail, while snout-vent length

(SVL) was estimated by measuring the snout tip to body terminus (Figurel). Tadpole

morphology descriptions were based on North American Tadpoles Measurement

(Unknown) and Altig and McDiarmid (1999).

Specimens were staged according to Gosner (1960) tables and observations were carried

almost everyday. The table reveals all the tadpole transformations in 46 different stages

m egg until free swimming larvae) (Figure 2). Tadpole stage will be counted from

9

Page 17: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

Field Stage I to Field stage 6. Field Stage I until 2 as the early stages and Field Stage 3

until 6 as the late stages. Identification of tadpoles was based on Leong (2005) and was

also referred to Prof Indraneil Das of Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) for

confirmation.

Dead and voucher specimens were preserved and stored in 4% buffered formalin solution.

Voucher specimens were deposited in the herpetology collections of the Universiti

Malaysia Sarawak. The tadpoles were anesthetized in 0.1 % of3-amino-benzoic acid ethyl

ester (MS 222) before photographs were taken. Photo of the tadpoles were taken using a

105 nun macro lens mounted on an SLR camera (Nikon F5 or D70).The photos of

tadpoles are taken from the left lateral side and from dorsal and ventral aspects.

Tadpole body length and snout-vent length measurement were analyzed using SPSS

Version 11.5 for mean and standard deviation.

10

Page 18: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

Mt-_~.J-___-l1-a-il-

TailSVL

Ai._c:o~t:-~ _. Ventra

Lateral EyesDorsal Eyes

()I i

Figure 1: Top left and middle; schematic diagram of a generalized anuran larva, illustrating the important morphology parameters: TAL (Tail length), SVL (Snout-vent length). Bottom left; illustrating the eyes position and right; is schematic diagram of a generalized anuran larva oral disc (adapted from Gregoire, 2005).

11

Page 19: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

Fields Stage 2 Fields Stage 4 (36-40) Fields Stage 6( 26-30 )

36 'JloeS3-SFields Stage 1 42 n •Hindlim~ rud Dmlopmem US -30) • , sep3~illed(21-25 ) ...len9ih 0) :Diameter (d)

~6 ,[l}j /< ! • rIIt I ~.,~." . I

G~ Iorelim~s emer~eall toes separilled I27 "I]>I rl '~ !..J Mouth anterior to nostrilI JII

c.rIU Tr:llls,31't1ll,Mouth Opens II[[]21 I II rI Fields Stage 7III I ~ ,.~.". If ~,= I rI~.,,' >I; II( Metill3rsaltu~ercle N".....0 ~billlld fin Circlli!lion .. • I ,;;z I 111 cI ~Ches

39

.". II 8perculllll Development ...)". :.. Field Stage 3 .... ~ - ......., f (31-35)H("~ .O~toe le'l@loplftlll ." J".

I llI . .W aWIi §t"'~.,." S

45 n, hil stu~3Z '" ::)4

._

"" IHdai1ti!lion 4-S"H ~ ~'".. Fields Stege 8'n c · ", 0"It, Indenti!llon 3-4 4 Fields Stage 5

hil resor~ed ~ " ~.g..... ::>. ..,"•• . HdentillioH !·3 46 AX" " .:II Iorelim~s visi~le

Met3mo~phosis cOlllplete

~ Indetr!i!lion H 2 Mouthparts G'~ i!lhrophf

Figure 2: Development stages described for anuran larvae (adapted from Katzman et ai., 2003 and modified based on Gosner, 1960 stages).

12

Page 20: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

4.1 Egg clutches

Jaafar et al. (1999) and Berry (1964) reported that the clutch size for F. limnocharis was

in the range 233-657 and 266-1318 eggs, respectively. However, the present study found

smaller clutch size for F. limnocharis. For F. cancrivora, the result obtained in this study

was comparable with data presented by Mohanty and Dutta (1999) and laafar et al. (1999)

(Table 1).

These differences could be due to several factors: egg clutches may break apart, some

may be washed away during heavy rain and may suffer from natural predation pressure

such as from aquatic insects (Mohanty and Dutta, 1999). laafar et al. (1999) stated that

the discrepancy may also be affected by clinal effects within species and geographical

differences. Hence it is not surprising that there exists a significant difference in clutch

size between or within both species in this study compared to other.

Result from this study also indicates that clutch size in F. cancrivora is significantly

greater than F. limnocharis. Data presented by laafar et al. (1999) also indicate that there

are significant differences in clutch size between these two species.

Table 1: Comparison of egg clutches size of Fejervarya limnocharis and Fejervarya cancrivora.

'ervarya limnocharis

,.jJ1"'an.la cancrivora

Present

140

870

Clutch size

Jaafar et aL

233-657

662-1677

and Dutta

632-1950

13

Page 21: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

4.2 Metamorphosis of Fejervarya limnocharis

The present study found that Fejervarya limnocharis tadpoles took 52 days to reach Stage

43 (n =2) under controlled condition. Survivor rates were low at the later stages; with only

2 of 6 individuals (3 3%) reaching Stage 43 . Most of the samples were found dead in the

later stages (Stage 35 and above). This result is different from the study by Pope (1931)

which took 28 days, Heyer (1973) 23 days and Roy and Khare (1978) 33-36 days. These

variations may be due to differences in experiment parameters, such as temperature, diet

and rearing conditions. Dodd and Dodd (1976) reported that metamorphosis duration is

influenced by various type of environment factor. These factors include temperature,

water available, density, light availability, diet and environmental iodine levels (Wilbur,

1977; Kupferberg, 1997). Alford and Harris (1988) confirmed that food quality can

determine the timing of metamorphosis by diet manipulations.

Figure 3 shows the development pattern of snout-vent length (SVL) and total length (TL)

measurement in 14 different metamorphosis stages of F limnocharis. At Stage 25 to

Stage 41 the tail length (TL - SVL) of F limnocharis was longer than SVL, but not more

than twice of SVL. At Stage 41, tail length was the longest and started to decrease in

Stage 42. The graph (Figure 3) shows that SVL have reach asymptote level at Stage 40

onwards.

These results indicate that F limnocharis SVL reached maximum growth at Stage 40,

whereas tail length was fully elongated at Stage 41 and started to resorb from Stage 41.

14

Page 22: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

., '" .. ,,;(\ n: r M· A . aem E In MALAYSlA SARA

Qtu Kota an;

30

25

20

c =15:I

10

5

25 26 27 28 29 30 31 35 36 37 38 40 41 42

- SVL Mean - lL Mean Metamorphosis Stage

Figure 3: Mean (nun) oftotallength (TL) and Snout-vent length (SVL) at different stages ofdevelopment.

4.2.1 Description of Fejervarya limnocharis tadpole

The larvae ofFejervarya limnocharis at Stage 37 have a total length of21.40 ± 0.75 mm

and snout vent length about 8.82 ± 0,59 mm (mean ± SD)(Table 1). They show an oval

body shape in dorsal view (Figure 4B).The snout is flatly rounded and the mouthpart is

Wlder the body (ventral) revealing that they are benthic (bottom) feeders. The eyes are

relatively large and positioned laterally in dorsal view, which enable them to have outline

lateral and dorsal view. The spiracle opening is oval in shape and situated laterally on the

left side of the body. This type spiracle is recognized as sinistral. The tail musculature is

strong with average maximum height 2.45 mm (n = 2). The end of the tail is blackish

(fi'om the tail tip to half of the tail) (Figure 4A). The vent is recognized as medial vent,

ruch is present in line with the axis of the ventral fm.

15

Page 23: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

The oral disc apparatus (Figure 4C) is positioned ventrally at the lower part of the body.

The oral disc is emarginated indented, the margin of the oral disc that persists when the

disc open. The marginal papillae show a large dorsal gap at the upper part of the labium

and small ventral gap at the lower part of the labium. Larvae upper and lower supportive

jaw cartilages have narrow dark keratinised jaws and serrate in shape. Upper parts of the

oral disc are bordered by the single row of marginal papillae and a lower part is two rows

of marginal papillae. The labial tooth row fonnula (L TRF) is 2(2)-3 . The labial tooth is

present in two rows at the anterior labium (A-I, A-2) and three rows at the posterior

labium (P-l, P-2, P-3).

B

Figure 4: Fejervarya limnocharis larvae at Stage 37. Scale bar = 4.0 mm. Top (A) lateral 'e:w' Middle (8) from dorsal view, and bottom (C) oral disc apparatus, scale bar = 1.0

16

Page 24: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN …...COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF METAMORPHOSIS IN F ejervarya limnocharis AND Fejervarya cancrivora (AMPHIBIA: ANURA) Poi Yong Min OL 667 Bachelor

.1.1 Metamorphosis stages description of Fejervarya limnocharis

C

Figure 5: Stage 29 ofFejervarya limnocharis (Gosner, 1960): Snout-vent length (SVL) =

7.99 ± 1.49 nun; Total length (TL) = 18.94 ± 0.37 mm. Top left (A) lateral view, scale bar = 2.0 nun; Bottom left (8) dorsal view, scale bar = 2.0 mm; and right (C) limb bud elongated and develops. Scale bar = 0.6 mm. Diameter and length of limb bud is about 0.32 nun and 0.54 nun. Length) 1 ~ ofdiameter.

c --.-...:-. ........--­..;~,... ..

"

B

igure 6: Stage 31 ofFejervarya limnocharis (Gosner, 1960): Snout-vent length (SVL) =

7.4 ± 0.52 nun; Total length (TL) = 18.85 ± 0.66 mm. Top left (A) dorsal view; bottom left (8) lateral view, whole body scale bar = 2.0 mm; and right (C) Bar = 1.0 mm. Limb bud length is more that twice diameter of limb bud. After this stage, the limb bud toes will start to develop.

17