comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

35
Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds reared in the Parmigiano Reggiano region Luca Fontanesi Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences University of Bologna Bologna, Italy

Upload: others

Post on 11-May-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Comparative genome

analyses of two local

cattle breeds reared in

the Parmigiano

Reggiano region

Luca FontanesiDepartment of Agricultural and Food SciencesUniversity of BolognaBologna, Italy

Page 2: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Giuseppina SchiavoSamuele BovoAnisa RibaniHamed KazemiValerio Joe UtzeriFrancesca BertoliniStefania Dall’Olio

Page 3: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds
Page 4: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

• About 40 kg of curedcheese obtained from about 520 liters of milk

• No silage and no preservatives

• 2820 farms with a totalof about 265,000 dairycattle

• About 16% of the milkproduced in Italy

• 3.6 M cheese moulds y

• 2.4 billion of euro

Page 5: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

Modenese (Bianca Val Padana)

Page 6: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

Modenese (Bianca Val Padana)

4,051 cattle registered to the herd book2,379 dairy cows in 129 farms

1,035 cattle registered to the herd book451 dairy cows in 46 farms

ANABoRaRe

Statistics 2018

Page 7: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

Modenese (Bianca Val Padana)

Page 8: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

1971 1981 1985 1995 2005 2015 2018

Reggiana cattle registered to the herd book

Years

Nu

mb

er

of

anim

als

1991

Page 9: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

Modenese (Bianca Val Padana)

Page 10: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

Modenese (Bianca Val Padana)

Page 11: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

Modenese (Bianca Val Padana)

Conservation genetics• Small populations• Inbreeding• Pedigree records (poor)• Mating plans• Breed-specific traits• Sustainable productions• Frauds• Cheese-making properties

of the milk• Unknown genetic

defects/deleteriour alleles• …

Page 12: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

FPED (mean)

Years

Page 13: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Genomic analyses

Page 14: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

Modenese (Bianca Val Padana)

Conservation genetics• Small populations• Inbreeding• Pedigree records (poor)• Mating plans• Breed-specific traits• Sustainable productions• Frauds• Cheese-making properties

of the milk• Unknown genetic

defects/deleteriour alleles• …

Page 15: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

Modenese (Bianca Val Padana)

658 cattle genotyped with:• the GeneSeek Genomic Profiler

Bovine 150K (GGP-HD)• several gene markers

110 cattle genotyped with:• the GeneSeek Genomic Profiler

Bovine 150K (GGP-HD)• several gene markers

Page 16: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Runs of Homozigosity (ROH)

• Minimum number of consecutive SNPs: 15Minimum homozygous density: 100Heterozygous allowed: 0Missing SNP allowed: 5Minimum length of the segment: 1000 kb

• Different length classes (1-2, 2-4, 4-8, 8-16, >16 Mbp)

• FROH (the proportion of the autosomal genome covered by ROH)

Page 17: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Runs of Homozigosity (ROH)

Page 18: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

FROH Reggiana

FROH Modenese

Mean = 0.0601 ± 0.0340

Mean = 0.0803 ± 0.0441

Nu

mb

er o

f an

imal

sN

um

ber

of

anim

als

Page 19: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

FPED (mean)

Years

Page 20: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

FPED (mean)

Years

Spearman correlation between FPED and FROH = 0.020

Page 21: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

Modenese (Bianca Val Padana)

Conservation genetics• Small populations• Inbreeding• Pedigree records (poor)• Mating plans• Breed-specific traits• Sustainable productions• Frauds• Cheese-making properties

of the milk• Unknown genetic

defects/deleteriour alleles• …

Page 22: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

Mono-breed Parmigiano Reggiano cheese

Frauds are an urgentproblem for the Reggiana production chain

Page 23: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

MSH

ASIP

MC1R

Melanocita

TYR -- TYRP1 -- TYRP2

Pheomelanin

(yellow/red)

Eumelanin

(black/brown)

Breed-specific traits: Coat colour

Page 24: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

R = Parmigiano-Reggiano from only Reggiana milkU = Parmigiano-Reggiano from unknown cattle

137 bp

118 bp

U R R R U U U U U U

MC1R alleles detectedfrom cheese DNA

Page 25: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Ed

E+

Holstein

Brown

Page 26: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

MC1R allele frequencies of the analysed Reggiana cattle

0.972

0.028

Page 27: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Modenese (Bianca Val Padana)

0.978

0.022

MC1R allele frequencies of the analysed Modenese cattle

Page 28: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Reggiana

Modenese (Bianca Val Padana)

Conservation genetics• Small populations• Inbreeding• Pedigree records (poor)• Mating plans• Breed-specific traits• Sustainable productions• Frauds• Cheese-making properties

of the milk• Unknown genetic

defects/deleteriour alleles• …

Page 29: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Cheese-making properties of the milk:k-casein (CSN3) genotypes

Page 30: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Conclusions (1)Reggiana herd book actions

1. For all animal records:▪ Inclusion of FROH in addition to FPED▪ Inclusion of MC1R genotype▪ Inclusion of CSN3 genotype

2. Carriers of other alleles at the MC1R gene willnot be registered anymore

3. The mono-breed authentication system based on the DNA analysis is driving the Reggiana production chain

Page 31: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Conclusions (2)

4. We are working to implement the use of FROH in mating plans in the Reggiana and Modenese breeds

5. We are working to detect deleterious alleles in the two breeds

6. We are moving from a simple description to the use of genomic variability/information for the sustainable conservation of cattle geneticresources

Page 32: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Thank you!

Acknowledgments

Massimo Bonacini Roberto MantovaniRoberto MottiMarco Prandi

Page 33: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds
Page 34: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

Breeds N. Genotypes (n. of animals)

EDED EDe E+E+ E+e E+E1 E1E1 E1e ee

Italian Holstein* 253 209 44 - - - - - -

Italian Brown 247 - - 75 4 107 31 7 -

Italian Simmental 208 - - 1 10 - - - 197

Reggiana 284 - - - - - - - 284

Modenese 74 - - 68 6 - - - -

Rendena 84 - - 43 2 36 3 - -

Jersey 100 - - 91 9 - - - -

Total 1250

*Spotted black

(Russo et al. 2007)

MC1R genotypes in different cattle breeds

Page 35: Comparative genome analyses of two local cattle breeds

E+ E+

E+ eE1 E1E+E1E1 e

Italian Brown

Genotypes

e e(E+ e)(E+ E+)

Italian Simmental

Genotypes

ED ED

ED e

Italian Holstein*

Genotipi

e e

Reggiana

Genotypes

Yes

E+ E1

Yes

ED

Yes

ED

No: E+ e

Yes

ED

No: e