comparative genomics ii : functional comparisons
DESCRIPTION
Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons. Caterino and Hayes, 2007. Overview. I. Comparing genome sequences Concepts and terminology Methods Whole-genome alignments Quantifying evolutionary conservation ( PhastCons , PhyloP , GERP) Identifying conserved elements - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Comparative Genomics II:Functional comparisons
Caterino and Hayes, 2007
![Page 2: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview
I. Comparing genome sequences• Concepts and terminology• Methods
- Whole-genome alignments- Quantifying evolutionary conservation (PhastCons, PhyloP, GERP)- Identifying conserved elements
• Utility and limitations of conservation• Available datasets at UCSC
II. Comparative analyses of function• Evolutionary dynamics of gene regulation• Case studies• Insights into regulatory variation within and across species
![Page 3: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Functional variation within and among species
Human
Chimp
Rhesus
Mouse
![Page 4: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Modularity of developmental gene expression
forebrain
gene A
Brain TFs
neural tube
gene A
Neural TFs
limb
Limb TFs
gene A
Regulatory changes introduce variance without disrupting protein function
Regulatory variation contributes to human phenotypic variation
overall
![Page 5: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Lettice et al. Hum Mol Genet 12:1725 (2003) Sagai et al. Development 132:797 (2005)
Regulatory mutations affecting pleiotropic genes cause discrete developmental changes
![Page 6: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Neutral Constrained Directional
Patterns of selection on gene expression and regulation
Romero et al., Nat Rev Genet. 13:505 (2012)
![Page 7: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Comparative approaches to identify conserved andvariant regulatory functions
Visel and Pennacchio, Nat Genet 42:557 (2010)
Regulatory conservation
Regulatory rewiring
![Page 8: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Furey and Sethupathy, Science 2013
Genetic drivers of gene regulatory variation
![Page 9: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• H3K4me2• H3K27ac
• H3K4me2• H3K27ac
Comparative analysis of ChIP-seq datasets
Human
Mouse
Compare TF binding, histone modifications,DNase hypersensitivity in equivalent tissues
Requires a statistical framework to reliably quantify changes inChIP-seq signals
![Page 10: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
•Input data are noisy: ChIP-seq, RNA-seq data are signal based, subjectto considerable experimental variation
•Using comparable biological states within and across species(e.g., human liver vs. mouse liver) = variation across tissues?
•How do epigenetic states and gene expression diverge among individuals and across species (Neutral? Constrained?)
•Can we identify variants or substitutions that drive regulatory changes?
Issues in comparative functional genomics
![Page 11: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
•10 human lymphoblastoid cell lines3 major population groups: European, East Asian, Nigerian9 females, 1 male9 analyzed by HapMap and 1000 Genomes
Science 328: 232 (2010)
•Targets:RNA Polymerase IINFkB
![Page 12: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
NFk
BPo
lII
Pair
wis
e di
ffer
ence
in b
indi
ng
Frac
tion
of r
egio
nsbo
und
# individuals
Variation in TF binding is common
![Page 13: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Science 342: 747 (2013)
•10 human lymphoblastoid cell lines1 population group (Nigerian)All analyzed by HapMap and 1000 Genomes
•Targets:RNA Polymerase IIH3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K27me3DNase hypersensitivity
![Page 14: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Measuring allelic imbalance in histone modification profiles
G allele
T allele
Need to map reads reliably to individual alleles
ChIP-seq reads
Allelicimbalance
![Page 15: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Cis-quantitative trait loci
~1200 identified
![Page 16: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Science 328: 1036 (2010)
•Targets:CCAAT/enhancer binding protein a (CEBPA)Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4a (HNF4A)Essential for normal liver development and function
•Tissue:Adult liver from 4 mammal species plus chicken
![Page 17: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Lineage-specific gain and loss of CEBPA binding in liverLineage-specific: 0 bp overlap in multiple species alignment
![Page 18: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Widespread variation in CEBPA binding in mammals
![Page 19: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Widespread variation in CEBPA binding in mammals
![Page 20: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Cell 154: 530 (2013)
![Page 21: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Enhancer-associatedhistone modification
Single TF binding events may not indicate regulatory function
• Many TFs are present at high concentrationsin the nucleus
• TF motifs are abundant in the genome
• Single TF binding events may be incidental
![Page 22: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Combinatorial TF binding events are more conserved
![Page 23: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Many TF binding changes do not have obvious genetic causes
In mammalian liver:
![Page 24: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Many TF binding changes do not have obvious genetic causes
In mouse liver:
![Page 25: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Human
Rhesus
Mouse
Bud stage; digitspecification Digit separation
Cell 154: 185 (2013)
![Page 26: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Identifying human-lineage changes in promoter and enhancer function
• Compare H3K27ac signal at orthologous sites
• ‘Stable marking’: 1.5-fold or less change in H3K27ac among human, rhesus and mouse
• Human gain: require significant, reproducible gain in human versus all 12 datasets in rhesus and mouse
![Page 27: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Mapping active promoters and enhancers in human limb
ENCODE cell lines
H3K27ac
![Page 28: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Gains in promoter and enhancer activity
• Bone morphogenesis• Chondrogenesis• Digit malformations in mouse
![Page 29: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Human-specific H3K27ac marking correlates with changes inenhancer function
![Page 30: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Epigenetic signatures reflect tissue identity and species relationships
H3K27ac signal in human and mouse
Primate
Mouse
H3K27ac in human, rhesus, mouse
![Page 31: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
• Human• Chimpanzee• Bonobo• Gorilla• Orangutan• Macaque• Mouse• Opossum• Platypus• Chicken
• Custom gene models based on Ensembl + RNA-seq• 5,636 1:1 orthologs in amniotes• 13,277 1:1 orthologs in primates• Only constitutive exons
Nature 478: 343 (2011)
![Page 32: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Global patterns of gene expression differences
![Page 33: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Gene expression recapitulates species phylogenies
![Page 34: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Gene expression divergence rates are tissue-specific
liver
testis
brain
![Page 35: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Gene expression divergence increases with evolutionary time
Conservation of core organ functions restricts divergence
![Page 36: Comparative Genomics II : Functional comparisons](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062411/568166ef550346895ddb4a72/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
•Comparative functional genomics identifies regulatory differenceswithin and among species
•TF binding is variable within species and highly variable among species
•Epigenetic comparisons provide more insight into biologicallyrelevant regulatory diversity and divergence
•Gene regulation and expression diverges with increasingphylogenetic distance – they mirror neutral expectation
Summary