comparing a formal proof · 2019-10-22 · comparing a formal proof in why3, coq, isabelle...

33
Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Upload: others

Post on 29-May-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Comparing a Formal Proof

in Why3, Coq, Isabelle

Jean-Jacques Lévy

18-10-2019journée LaMHA + LTP

Page 2: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Motivation

2

.. with Ran Chen, Cyril Cohen, Stephan Merz, Laurent Théry

• to be fully published in articles or journals

• algorithms on graphs = a good testbed (better than )

• nice algorithms should have simple formal proofs

• how to publish formal proofs ?

• formal proofs have to be checked by computer

p2

http://www-sop.inria.fr/marelle/Tarjan/contributions.html

VSTTE 2017, ITP 2019

Page 3: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

A one-pass linear-time algorithm

Tarjan, 1972

Page 4: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Strongly connected components

4

• x and y are strongly connected if there exists a path from x to y and a path from y to x

• depth-first search algorithm tracking bases of scc’s

• vertices are pushed on a stack in order of their visit and popped when the base of a scc is found

• scc is a maximal set of vertices in which each pair is strongly connected

Page 5: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Strongly connected components

5

graphstack

spanning forrest

2 8

3

4

9

1

7

5

6

0

Page 6: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Strongly connected components

6

stack9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

4

4

5

5

5

2

1

1

1

0

spanning forrest

2 8

3

4

9

1

7

5

6

0

a vertex x is a base when

Page 7: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Functional programming

Page 8: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Functional programming

Page 9: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Proof

Page 10: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Program

Page 11: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Program

Page 12: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Invariants

(1) consistent colors

(2) consistent numbering

(3) vertices pairwise distinct in stack

(4) no edge from black to white

(5) in stack any vertex reaches any higher vertex

(6) in stack any vertex reaches a gray lower vertex

(7) the sccs field is the set of black SCCs

Page 13: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Invariants

stack

123489

**

1234567

**

Page 14: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Why3 Proof

Page 15: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Pre/Post-conditions

} LOWLINK

Page 16: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Assertions

Page 17: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Assertionscom

pleteness

Page 18: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Completeness proved in Coq

18

• 3 cases on y’

• y’ in sccs

• y’ is white vertex

• y’ in s3

dfs (successors x)

http://jeanjacqueslevy.net/why3/graph/abs/scct/1-68/scc.html

Page 19: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Assertions

+ 2 Coq proofs (16 loc + 141 loc)

Page 20: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Coq Proof

Page 21: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Functions

21

Record env := Env {black : {set V}; stack : seq V; sccs : {set {set V}};sn : nat; num : {ffun V ➔ nat}}.

Definition dfs1 dfs x e := let: (n1, e1) := dfs [set y in successors x] (add_stack x e) in if n1 < sn e then (n1, add_black x e1) else (infty, add_sccs x e1).

Definition dfs dfs1 dfs’ r e := if [pick x in r] isn't Some x then (infty, e) else let r' := r :\ x in let: (n1, e1) := if num e x != 0 then (num e x, e) else dfs1 x e in

let: (n2, e2) := dfs’ r’ e1 in (minn n1 n2, e2).

Page 22: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Functions

22

Fixpoint tarjan_rec n := if n is n1.+1 then dfs (dfs1 (tarjan_rec n1)) (tarjan_rec n1) else fun r e => (infty, e).

Let N := #|V| * #|V|.+1 + #|V|.

Definition tarjan := sccs (tarjan_rec N setT e0).2.

Page 23: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Proof

23

Definition dfs_correct (dfs : {set V} ➔ env ➔ nat ∗ env) r e :=

pre_dfs r e ➔ let (n, e’) := dfs r e in post_dfs r e e’ n.

Definition dfs1_correct (dfs1 : V ➔ env ➔ nat ∗ env) x e :=

(x ∈ white e) ➔ pre_dfs [set x] e ➔

let (n, e’) := dfs1 x e in post_dfs [set x] e e’ n.

Page 24: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Proof

24

Lemma dfs_is_correct dfs1’ dfs’ (r : {set V}) e : (∀x, x ∈ r ➔ dfs1_correct dfs1’ x e) ➔

(∀x, x ∈ r ➔ ∀e1, white e1 \subset white e ➔

dfs_correct dfs’ (r :\ x) e1) ➔ dfs_correct (dfs dfs1’ dfs’) r e.

Lemma dfs1_is_correct dfs’ (x : V) e : (dfs_correct dfs’ [set y | edge x y] (add_stack x e)) ➔ dfs1_correct (dfs1 dfs’) x e.

Theorem tarjan_rec_terminates n r e : n ≥ #|white e| ∗ #|V|.+1 + #|r| ➔

dfs_correct (tarjan_rec n) r e.

Page 25: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Another Coq proof

• Coq with Ssreflect + Mathematical Components

Page 26: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Another Coq proof

26

stack e<latexit sha1_base64="Fjv1N16zA/up9j6TOEMoVmfri/Y=">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</latexit>

num[x] = 1+ 1<latexit sha1_base64="rDApI6DMzwZ89A7wOljQIf0nf8k=">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</latexit>

white

num[x] = 1<latexit sha1_base64="HDK7ctJY120NtfizFCaM8/M4k/I=">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</latexit>

sccs<latexit sha1_base64="DBw5V/kSjDMNyvUyZG3kj/X8L3M=">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</latexit>

0 num[x] < 1<latexit sha1_base64="9xH2rGh5YNbn/uLdIo6+P4K1KaY=">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</latexit>

Page 27: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Another Coq proof

Page 28: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Isabelle/HOL Proof

Page 29: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Proof

29

function (domintros) dfs1 and dfs where dfs1 x e = (let (n1, e1) = dfs (successors x) (add_stack_incr x e) in if n1 < int (sn e) then (n1, add_black x e1) else (let (l, r) = split_list x (stack e1) in (+∞, (| black = insert x (black e1), gray = gray e, stack = r, sn = sn e1, sccs = insert (set l) (sccs e1), num = set_infty l (num e1) |) )))

and dfs roots e = (if roots = {} then (+∞, e) else (let x = SOME x . x ∈ roots;

res1 = (if num e x ≠ ︎-1 then (num e x, e) else dfs1 x e);

res2 = dfs (roots - {x}) (snd res1) in (min (fst res1) (fst res2), snd res2) ))

Page 30: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Proof

30

theorem dfs1_dfs_termination :

[x ∈ vertices - colored e; colored_num e] ⟹ dfs1_dfs_dom (Inl(x, e)) [r ⊆ vertices; colored_num e] ⟹ dfs1_dfs_dom (Inr(r, e))

theorem dfs_partial_correct:

[dfs1_dfs_dom (Inl(x, e)); dfs1_pre x e] ⟹ dfs1_post x e (dfs1 x e)

[dfs1_dfs_dom (Inr(r, e)); dfs_pre r e] ⟹ dfs_post r e (dfs r e)

definition colored_num where colored_num e ≡

∀v ∈ colored e. v ∈ vertices ∧ num e v ≠ ︎-1

theorem dfs_correct:

dfs1_pre x e ⟹ dfs1_post x e (dfs1 x e)

dfs_pre r e ⟹ dfs_post roots e (dfs r e)

Page 31: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Conclusion

Page 32: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Why3 - Coq - Isabelle

32

… other systems ?

why3 coq isabelle/HOL

expressivity - ++ +readability +++ - +stability - +++ +ease of use - - -automation ++ - +partial correctness +++ - - -code extraction ++ + -trusted base - +++ +++# lines auto 392 0 ? (314ui)# lines manual 157 1535 1690

http://www-sop.inria.fr/marelle/Tarjan/contributions.html

Page 33: Comparing a Formal Proof · 2019-10-22 · Comparing a Formal Proof in Why3, Coq, Isabelle Jean-Jacques Lévy 18-10-2019 journée LaMHA + LTP

Todo list

33

• other algorithms (biconnected, planarity, minimum spanning tree)

• proof of implementation

• teaching