comparing olympus x-ray diffraction to conventional xrd

12
Comparing Olympus X-Ray Diffraction to conventional XRD

Upload: olympus-ims

Post on 16-Jul-2015

392 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparing Olympus X-Ray Diffraction to conventional XRD

ComparingOlympus X-Ray Diffraction

to conventional XRD

Page 2: Comparing Olympus X-Ray Diffraction to conventional XRD

Olympus XRD Analyzers

BTX IIBenchtop XRD

Compact Lab Use

TERRA Portable XRD

Field Use

Page 3: Comparing Olympus X-Ray Diffraction to conventional XRD

How is Olympus XRD different? Small Portable Low unit cost Low power

Conventional XRD Olympus XRD

Low operating cost No moving parts Easy sample prep Fast analysis

Page 4: Comparing Olympus X-Ray Diffraction to conventional XRD

Compact Geometry

• Power of x-ray tube can be reduced without sacrificing the number of available photons compared to large instruments

• Lower power tube eliminates need for external cooling and results in overall lower power consumption

r

Debye-Scherrer XRD geometry:Photons fall off as a function of 1/r2

Page 5: Comparing Olympus X-Ray Diffraction to conventional XRD

Simultaneous Measurement

• Conventional 2KW instruments take a few seconds to collect each 2Θ measurement and scanning entire 2Θ range can take 15 mins to several hours

• CCD detector used by Olympus collects the entire 2Θ range simultaneously so complete diffraction pattern is visible almost immediately

Page 6: Comparing Olympus X-Ray Diffraction to conventional XRD

Simultaneous Measurement

secondary peaks clear

1 min / 4 exposures

3 min / 11 exposures

10 min / 36 exposures

For identifiable peaks, quantification stabilizes

very quickly

secondary peaks visible

primary peaks visible - likely identifiable

Page 7: Comparing Olympus X-Ray Diffraction to conventional XRD

Energy Discrimination Detector• Energy sensitive detector distinguishes between

photons with the same energy as the X-ray tube contributing to the XRD pattern vs counts caused by florescence of the sample

• The Smart Sense filter selectively removes the counts caused by florescence to provide better signal-to-noise pattern

Page 8: Comparing Olympus X-Ray Diffraction to conventional XRD

Transmission Geometry

• Power of x-ray tube can be reduced without sacrificing number of available photons compared to large instruments

• Lower power tube eliminates need for external cooling and results in overall lower power consumption

• Eliminates need for goniometer and calibrations associated with that equipment used in reflective geometry

r

Debye-Scherrer XRD geometry:Photons fall off as a function of 1/r2

Page 9: Comparing Olympus X-Ray Diffraction to conventional XRD

Comparison Diffractograms

Lab based 2KW PXRD

Lab based 2KW PXRD

Olympus Terra/BTXIIOlympus

Terra/BTXII

Drywall Sample with a 5 minute acquisition time.

Page 10: Comparing Olympus X-Ray Diffraction to conventional XRD

Comparison Diffractograms

Lab based 2KW PXRD

Lab based 2KW PXRD

Olympus Terra/BTXIIOlympus

Terra/BTXII

A complex pharmaceutical sample

Page 11: Comparing Olympus X-Ray Diffraction to conventional XRD

For more information, please contact Olympus Applications Support

[email protected]

BTX IIBenchtop XRD

TERRA Portable XRD

Page 12: Comparing Olympus X-Ray Diffraction to conventional XRD

For more information please visit:www.olympus-ims.com