comparing the competitive advantages between mcdonald and kfc, for young consumers in hsinchu area....
TRANSCRIPT
Comparing the competitive advantages between McDonald and KFC, for young consumers in Hsinchu area.
Professor: Dr. Trappey Students: 陳嘉麟 9562503 蔡林龍 9562502 吳晉瑋 952028
Introduction
Literature review In Taiwan, McDonald grew up fast and successfully with flexible
marketing strategies and QSC&V (Guang-Shiash Hu, 2000), Although
McDonald adopted the marketing strategy of cutting prices, the consumers
will not increase their consuming amount. (Wei-Hua Chen, Chia-Chun
Tsai, 2003) Only the improvement of utility and enjoyment will raise
up consuming amount (Yi-Wen Wang & Ming-Tsung Lee,2005).
Define the problem and market research questions.
Comparing the competitive advantages between McDonald and KFC.
The target population is the young consumers (under 30) in
Hsinchu City.
Methodology
Hypotheses
Survey
Statistical Analysis
Research Finding
Conclusions suggestions
Research Framework:
We will use the approach of setting up a questionnaire concerning customers’
preference. and collect results from young consumers in Hsinchu area, to compare
the advantages between Macdonald and KFC when customers choose western fast
food chains. The Hypothesis were shown below
Hypothesis1To compare with KFC ,” Environment” is a competitive advantage of McDonald
Hypothesis2To compare with KFC ,” Food selection” is a competitive advantage of McDonald
Hypothesis3To compare with KFC ,” Price” is a competitive advantage of McDonald
Hypothesis4To compare with KFC ,” Brand image” is a competitive advantage of McDonald
Hypothesis5To compare with KFC ,” Service” is a competitive advantage of McDonald
Hypothesis6To compare with KFC ,” Taste of Food” is a competitive advantage of Macdonald
Data Collection Plan:
What: to compare with the advantages of Macdonald and KFC
in young consumers in Hsin-Chu
Where: Macdonald and FKC in kung-Fu Rd.
Who: Young Consumers (under 30 years old)
When: 23 May
How: Adopting questionnaires
How many: 70 valid questionnaires
Results and Finding
Beliefs of Young Consumers:
When young consumers selected a fast food restaurant, they care about the service and taste of food most.
Hypothesis 1 : To compare with KFC ,” Environment” is a competitive advantage of McDonald
Dat
a
KFCMac.
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
Boxplot of Mac., KFC
Hypothesis: Ha: μM>μKFC
Two-sample T for Mac. vs KFC
N Mean StDev SE MeanMac. 70 33.50 8.05 0.96KFC 70 33.46 6.20 0.74
Difference = mu (Mac.) - mu (KFC)T-Test of difference = 0 (vs >): T-Value = 0.04 P-Value = 0.486 DF = 13
P-value>0.05, Do not Reject H0,
Environment is not a competitive advantage of
McDonald
Dat
a
KFCMac
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
Boxplot of Mac, KFC Two-sample T for Mac vs KFC
N Mean StDev SE MeanMac 70 33.74 7.08 0.85KFC 70 33.74 5.59 0.67
Difference = mu (Mac) - mu (KFC)T-Test of difference = 0 (vs >): T-Value = -0.00 P-Value = 0.500 DF = 138
Hypothesis: Ha: μM>μKFC
P-value>0.05, Do not Reject H0,
Food selection is not a competitive advantage
of McDonald
Hypothesis 2 : To compare with KFC ,” Food selection” is a competitive advantage of McDonald
Two-sample T for Mac vs KFC
N Mean StDev SE MeanMac 70 34.0 11.3 1.4KFC 70 30.87 8.81 1.1
Difference = mu (Mac) - mu (KFC)T-Test of difference = 0 (vs >): T-Value = 1.81 P-Value = 0.037 DF = 130
Dat
a
KFCMac
50
40
30
20
10
Boxplot of Mac, KFC
Hypothesis 3 : To compare with KFC ,” Price” is a competitive advantage of McDonald
Hypothesis: Ha: μM>μKFC
P-value<0.05, Do not Reject H0,
Price is a competitive advantage of McDonald
Dat
a
KFCMac
50
40
30
20
10
Boxplot of Mac, KFC
Hypothesis 4: To compare with KFC ,” Brand image” is a \ competitive advantage of McDonald
Two-sample T for Mac vs KFC
N Mean StDev SE MeanMac 70 34.40 9.76 1.2KFC 70 32.16 8.61 1.0
Difference = mu (Mac) - mu (KFC)T-Test of difference = 0 (vs >): T-Value = 1.44 P-Value = 0.076 DF = 138
Hypothesis: Ha: μM>μKFC
P-value>0.05, Do not Reject H0,
Brand image is not a competitive advantage of
McDonald
Two-sample T for Mac vs KFC
N Mean StDev SE MeanMac 70 38.21 8.82 1.1KFC 70 35.96 8.51 1.0
Difference = mu (Mac) - mu (KFC)T-Test of difference = 0 (vs >): T-Value = 1.54 P-Value = 0.063 DF = 138
Dat
a
KFCMac
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
Boxplot of Mac, KFC
Hypothesis 5: To compare with KFC ,” Service” is a competitive advantage of McDonald
Hypothesis: Ha: μM>μKFC
P-value>0.05, Do not Reject H0,
Service is not a competitive advantage of McDonald
Hypothesis 6: To compare with KFC ,” Taste of Food” is a competitive advantage of Macdonald
Dat
a
KFCMac
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
Boxplot of Mac, KFC Two-sample T for Mac vs KFC
N Mean StDev SE MeanMac 70 37.66 8.01 0.96KFC 70 36.70 7.36 0.88
Difference = mu (Mac) - mu (KFC)T-Test of difference = 0 (vs >): T-Value = 0.74 P-Value = 0.231 DF = 138
Hypothesis: Ha: μM>μKFC
P-value>0.05, Do not Reject H0,
Food is not a competitive advantage of McDonald
Factors Blief
Mean(Belief times
Rating)
STDDV(Belief times
Rating) T-value
P-value
McDonald KFC McDonald KFC
Environment
5.04 33.50 33.46 8.05 6.2 0.04 0.486
Food Selection
5.03 33.74 33.76 7.08 5.59 0 0.5
Price 4.99 34.00 30.87 11.3 8.81 1.81* 0.037*
Brand Image
4.81 34.40 32.16 9.76 8.91 1.44 0.076
Service 5.26 38.21 35.96 8.82 8.51 1.54 0.063
Taste of Food
5.27 37.66 36.79 8.01 7.36 0.74 0.231
Summary Table of Test:
Conclusions &Suggestions
Conclusions:
(1) When young consumers selected a fast food restaurant, they care about the
service and taste of food most. In order to increase the market share of young
consumers, restaurants have to put most effort on the service and taste of food.
(2) Young consumers consider that the McDonald provided a more reasonable
price than KFC. To McDonald, it’s a advantage to KFC and should be maintained.
On the other hand, KFC should make a detail research about the reason why young
consumers have such recognition about the price of two restaurants.
(3) We found that every factor, the all standard deviation of McDonald were greater
than KFC. It possibly means that young consumers give the more diverse rating
on McDonald.
(4) We got the marginal p-value on service and taste of food and that could be
the latent competitive advantages of McDonald.
Suggestions:
This is just an explorative research. Seventy questionnaires maybe not sufficient
to get the precise results. Enlarge the number of the respondents is the first
suggestion in future research. Moreover, most our respondents are senior
high school students, we may lack the opinions of college students and others
who are under 30 years old. Why young consumers think the price of McDonald
are more reasonable, a detail research is needed.
Thanks for your Attention
Professor: Dr. Trappey Students: 陳嘉麟 9562503 蔡林龍 9562502 吳晉瑋 952028