comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics...

21
Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio-economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University Chengyan Yue, University of Minnesota Vicki McCracken, Washington State University Jim Luby, University of Minnesota Jim McFerson, Washington Tree Fruit Research Commission Alicia Rihn, University of Minnesota Dinkar Kuchibhotla, Washington State University

Upload: stella-west

Post on 29-Mar-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio-

economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

Chengyan Yue, University of MinnesotaVicki McCracken, Washington State University

Jim Luby, University of MinnesotaJim McFerson, Washington Tree Fruit Research Commission

Alicia Rihn, University of MinnesotaDinkar Kuchibhotla, Washington State University

Page 2: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

Background: Socio-Economics Team Goals

Superior new cultivars can improve profitability and sustainability of U.S. Rosaceae crop industries

Rosaceae breeders have little empirical basis to assign relative importance to traits in new cultivars

Selection targets for new cultivars Based on breeders’ viewpoints Influenced by industry and market forces, but

not transparently so

RosBREED

Page 3: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

Socio-Economics Team Goal

RosBREED

¨ Determine what each supply chain sector values:¨ breeders¨ producers/processors¨ market intermediaries¨ consumers

¨ Use this information to develop new cultivars that will be more quickly accepted and have enhanced commercial impact

Help accelerate and increase efficiency of cultivar development and adoption by identifying valuable

breeding trait targets

Page 4: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

RosBREEDSocio-Economics Team will

determine trait values

Breeder survey 2010

Producer survey Fall 2011/

Winter 2012

Market Intermediary

survey Spring 2011

Household data analysis 2010;

consumer survey 2012

What trait is my next breeding

target?

We like disease resistant apple

trees!

I like tasty strawberries!

We like firm tart cherries that pit well!

Processors

Page 5: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

RosBREED

• TurningPoint surveys scheduled at 14 winter meetings nationwide (7 conducted and analyzed; 10 total conducted)

• Quantify grower preferences• Analyze respondent demographics• What traits are most important to producers?• What traits are least important to producers?• What factors influence new cultivar adoption?

Tell Us What You Want

Page 6: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

Grower Clicker Survey Locations

RosBREED

What fruit traits are

important to you?

Page 7: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

The next slides summarize survey dataMost important traitsLeast important traits

CropsTart cherrySweet cherryStrawberryFresh appleProcessing peach

Supply chain sectorsBreedersGrowersPackers/Shippers/Processors

Page 8: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

RosBREED

Tart Cherry TraitsProducersBreeders Market

Intermediaries

Exterior appearance

Phytonutrient

Size

Pit shape

Interior color

Fruit uniformity

Other

Fruit color

Soluble solids/sweetness

Machine harvest ability

Disease resistance

Productivity

Fruit firmness

Pit removal

- 10 20 30 40 50

4

4

15

26

26

15

11

8

8

15

31

39

MOST Important Traits

Exterior appearance

Phytonutrient

Size

Pit shape

Interior color

Fruit uniformity

Other

Fruit color

Soluble solids

Machine harvest ability

Disease resistance

Productivity

Fruit firmness

Pit removal

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

10

10

20

20

40

14

11

32

7

4

32

LEAST Important Traits

%%

Page 9: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

RosBREED

PhytonutrientShape

Interior colorTartness

Freedom from pittingFruit skin color

Extended harvest seasonVirus resistance

Resistance to powdery mildewSweetness

Self fertilityStem attractiveness

Exterior appearanceOther fruit quality

Fruit firmnessFruit flavor

Fruit size

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

1112

4

213

4730

3

699

2513

34

MOST Important Traits

PhytonutrientShape

Interior colorTartness

Freedom from pittingFruit skin color

Extended harvest seasonVirus resistance

Resistance to powdery mildewSweetness

Self fertilityStem attractiveness

Exterior appearanceOther fruit quality

Fruit firmnessFruit flavor

Fruit size

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

30172020

333

3

617

2914

5

25

121

LEAST Important Traits

Sweet Cherry TraitsProducersBreeders Market

Intermediaries

%%

Page 10: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

RosBREEDSeed color

Ease of cap removalPhytonutrient

Minimal seedinessInternal color

ShapeOther

Open plant canopyFruit skin color

External appearanceProductivity

Extended harvest seasonShelf life at retail

Fruit sizeRoot rot resistance

Exterior colorFruit firmness

Fruit flavor

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

44

413

94

22

1722

2

102

212

469

8.3

4.24.2

29.212.5

41.7

Strawberry MOST Important TraitsCalifornia Producers

Market IntermediariesBreeders Michigan

Producers

%

Page 11: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

RosBREEDSeed color

Ease of cap removalPhytonutrient

Minimal seedinessInternal color

ShapeOther

Open plant canopyFruit skin color

External appearanceProductivity

Extended harvest seasonShelf life at retail

Fruit sizeRoot rot resistance

Exterior colorFruit firmness

Fruit flavor

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

4132

14555

1321

48

2513

4

13

426

2610

210

22

Strawberry LEAST Important TraitsCalifornia Producers

Michigan Producers

Market Intermediaries

%

Page 12: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

RosBREEDAroma

PhytonutrientShape

TartnessJuiciness

SizeOther fruit quality attributes

Storage lifeDisease resistance

No storage disordersExternal appearance

Sugar/acid balanceSweetness/soluble solids

Shelf life at retailFruit firmnessExterior colorFruit crispness

Fruit flavor

0 20 40 60 80 100

2

2

27

9676

1543

33

5

13

335

2610

23

54

777

7

2341

Apple MOST Important TraitsBreeders Market

IntermediariesMichigan Producers

Washington Producers

%

Page 13: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

RosBREED

AromaPhytonutrient

ShapeTartnessJuiciness

SizeOther

Storage lifeDisease resistance

No storage disordersExternal appearance

Sugar/acid balanceSweetness/soluble solids

Shelf life at retailFruit firmnessExterior colorFruit crispness

Fruit flavor

0 20 40 60 80 100

12

331

161112

3

2

18

1616

1314

211

3535

145

35

3

Apple LEAST Important TraitsWashington Producers

Michigan Producers

Market Intermediaries

%

Page 14: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

RosBREED

Aroma

Tartness

Other

Flesh color

Fruit texture

Disease resistance

Absence of split pits

Uniform harvest maturity

Sweetness

Fruit size

Productivity

Fruit firmness

Fruit flavor

0 20 40 60

5

5

14

19

33

24

14.3

14.3

14.3

14.3

42.9

MOST Important Traits

Aroma

Tartness

Other

Flesh color

Fruit texture

Disease resistance

Absence of split pits

Uniform harvest maturity

Sweetness

Fruit size

Productivity

Fruit firmness

Fruit flavor

0 20 40 60

57

14

14

14

18

18

9

5

4.55

45

LEAST Important Traits

Processing Peach Traits

Breeders California Producers

Market Intermediaries

% %

Page 15: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

Crop Trait

Jewel in the Genome

Most Important Trait for

Breeder Producer

Packer/Shipper/Processor

Tart cherry Firmness No Yes Yes Yes

Fruit color Yes No No No

Internal color Yes No No No

Size Yes No No No

Sweet cherry Fruit size Yes Yes Yes Yes

Self fertility Yes Yes No No

Fruit skin color

Yes Yes No No

Internal color Yes No No No

Summary

Page 16: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

Crop TraitJewel in the Genome

Most Important Trait for

Breeder Producer

Packer/ Shipper/ Processor

Strawberry Fruit flavor Yes Yes Yes Yes

Fresh apple Fruit flavor Yes Yes Yes Yes

External color Yes No No Yes

Storage life Yes No No No

Processed peach

Flavor Yes Yes No Yes

Sweetness Yes Yes No Yes

Texture Yes No No No

Summary (cont.)

Page 17: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

RosBREED will develop Marker-Assisted Breeding capability for traits with high

economic values (our Jewels)

$Marker-assisted

breeding in application

Page 18: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

RosBREED

• Preliminary data has identified opportunities and challenges• Stakeholders agree and disagree on the importance of

certain traits• Consensus on traits

– Fruit size in sweet cherries– Flavor in strawberries and apples

• Lack of consensus on other traits– Exterior color in apple and strawberry– Flavor in processing peach – Self-fertility in sweet cherry

• Some jewels may be rocks!

Conclusions

Page 19: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

RosBREED

Conclusions• Preliminary data• More survey information has been and will be collected Winter meeting TurningPoint surveys Mail-in grower surveys• Much more analysis will be required – from an S-E, genomics and

breeding perspective• Systematic socio-economic approach

Unique approach in crop plants & scientific literatureCrop trait value Factors influencing decisions to adopt new cultivars

• Integral to RosBREED’s goal

Help accelerate and increase efficiency of cultivar adoption by identifying breeding targets of value to supply chain stakeholders.

Page 21: Comparing the importance of fruit traits to different stakeholders: preliminary socio- economics survey results Karina Gallardo, Washington State University

Questions?