comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of...

16
Comparison of Simulation Results Three Level and Five Level H-bridge Inverter and hardware implementation of Single Leg H-Bridge Three Level Inverter Abstract: The conventional two level inverter has many limitations for high voltage and high power application. Multilevel inverter becomes very popular for high voltage and high power application. The multilevel began with the three level converters. The elementary concept of a multilevel converter to achieve higher power to use a series of power semiconductor switches with several lower voltage dc source to perform the power conversion by synthesizing a staircase voltage waveform. However, the output voltage is smoother with a three level converter, in which the output voltage has three possible values. This results in smaller harmonics, but on the other hand it has more components and is more complex to control. In this paper, study of different three level inverter topologies and SPWM technique is explain and SPWM technique has been applied to formulate the switching pattern for three level and five level H-Bridge inverter that minimize the harmonic distortion at the inverter output. This paper deals with comparison of simulation results of three level and five level H-Bridge inverter and implementation of single leg of three level H-Bridge inverter. Keywords: Topologies of Multilevel inverter, Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation, THD. Mamta N. Kokate M-Tech (Student): Dept. of Electrical Engg Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management Nagpur, (India) Prof. Preeti V. Kapoor Assistant Professor, Dept. of Electrical Engg Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management Nagpur, (India) ISSN 2319-9725

Upload: swaroopakunsoth

Post on 27-Dec-2015

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

Comparison of Simulation Results Three Level

and Five Level H-bridge Inverter and hardware

implementation of Single Leg H-Bridge Three

Level Inverter

Abstract: The conventional two level inverter has many limitations for high voltage and

high power application. Multilevel inverter becomes very popular for high voltage and

high power application. The multilevel began with the three level converters. The

elementary concept of a multilevel converter to achieve higher power to use a series of

power semiconductor switches with several lower voltage dc source to perform the power

conversion by synthesizing a staircase voltage waveform. However, the output voltage is

smoother with a three level converter, in which the output voltage has three possible

values. This results in smaller harmonics, but on the other hand it has more components

and is more complex to control. In this paper, study of different three level inverter

topologies and SPWM technique is explain and SPWM technique has been applied to

formulate the switching pattern for three level and five level H-Bridge inverter that

minimize the harmonic distortion at the inverter output. This paper deals with comparison

of simulation results of three level and five level H-Bridge inverter and implementation of

single leg of three level H-Bridge inverter.

Keywords: Topologies of Multilevel inverter, Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation, THD.

Mamta N. Kokate

M-Tech (Student): Dept. of Electrical Engg

Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management

Nagpur, (India)

Prof. Preeti V. Kapoor

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Electrical Engg

Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management

Nagpur, (India)

ISSN 2319-9725

Page 2: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 389

1. Introduction:

The conventional voltage source inverters produce an output voltage at the poles with levels +Vdc/2 or

–Vdc/2 , where Vdc is the DC link voltage are known as two level inverter. To obtain a quality output

voltage or a current waveform with a minimum amount of ripple content, they require high switching

frequency along with various pulse width modulation strategies. In high voltage and high power

application these two level inverters however, have some limitations in operating at high frequency

mainly due to switching losses and constraint of device rating.

Multilevel inverters have been attracting in favor of academic as well as industry in the recent decade

for high-power and medium-voltage energy control. In addition, they can synthesize switched

waveforms with lower levels of harmonic distortion than an equivalently rated two-level converter.

The multilevel concept is used to decrease the harmonic distortion in the output waveform without

decreasing the inverter power output. This paper presents the most important topologies like diode-

clamped inverter (neutral- point clamped), capacitor-clamped (flying capacitor), and cascaded

multilevel with separate dc sources.

Multilevel inverter is based on the fact that sine wave can be approximated to a stepped waveform

having large number of steps. The steps being supplied from different DC levels supported by series

connected batteries or capacitors[1][2]. The unique structure of multi- level inverter allows them to

reach high voltages and therefore lower voltage rating device can be used. As the number of levels

increases, the synthesized output waveform has more steps, producing a very fine stair case wave and

approaching very closely to the desired sine wave. It can be easily understood that as motor steps are

included in the waveform the harmonic distortion of the output wave decrease, approaching zero as the

number of levels approaches infinity. Hence Multi- level inverters offer a better choice at the high

power end because the high volt- ampere ratings are possible with these inverters without the

problems of high dv/dt and the other associated ones [2]

2. Multilevel Inverter Topology:

The basic three types of multilevel topologies used are [3]-[4]:

i. Diode clamped multilevel inverters

ii. Flying capacitors multilevel inverter or capacitor clamped multilevel inverter

iii. Cascaded inverter with separate DC sources.

Page 3: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 390

2.1 Diode Clamped Multilevel Inverters:

The diode clamped multilevel inverter uses capacitors in series to divide up the dc bus voltage into a

set of voltage levels. To produce n levels of the phase voltage, an n level diode clamp inverter needs

(n-1) capacitors on the dc bus.

Vdc

C

C

Vdc

2

Vdc

2

A1

A1

C2

C2

C1

B2

B1

B2

C1

B1A1

A2

A2

D2

D1D1

D2

D1

D2

O VA

VC

VB

Figure 1: Diode Clamped Three Level Inverters

In this paper, diode clamped multilevel inverters topology is used shown in fig 1.

2.2 Flying Capacitor Multilevel Inverter:

It uses ladder structures of dc side capacitors where the voltage on each capacitor differs from that of

the next capacitor. To generate n- level staircase output voltage, (n-1) capacitors in the dc bus are

needed. The size of the voltage increment between two capacitors determines the size of the voltage

levels in the output wave.

Page 4: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 391

Vdc

C

C

Vdc

2

Vdc

2

A1

A1

C2

C2

C1

B2

B1

B2

C1

B1A1

A2

A2

O VA

VC

VB

C1C2 C3

Figure 2: Flying Capacitor Three Level Inverter

2.3 Cascaded Inverters With Separate DC Source:

This inverter is nothing but the series connection of single connection of single phase inverters with

separate dc source. This inverter can be avoiding the extra clamping diodes or voltage balancing

capacitors.

Vdc

VA VB VC

Vdc

A1 A2

A1 A2

B2

B1

C2

C1

Vdc

N

B2

B1

C2

C1

Figure 3: Cascaded Inverters with Separate DC Source

Page 5: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 392

3. Control Technique:

The sinusoidal PWM technique is very popular for industrial converters. Fig4. Shows the general

principle of SPWM, where an isosceles triangle carrier wave of frequency fc is compared with the

fundamental frequency f sinusoidal modulating wave, and the points of intersection determine the

switching points of power devices.[7]-[8]

Figure 4: Control Pulse Generation for Three

Level SPWM

Figure 5: Control Pulse Generation for Five

Level SPWM

Three level pulse width modulated waveforms can be generated by sine carrier PWM. Sine carrier

PWM is generated by comparing the reference control signals with two triangular carrier waves as

shown in fig: 4, similarly pulse generation for five level inverter is generated by comparing the

reference control signals with four triangular carrier wave shown in fig: 5

Vio = Vdc/2, when A1 =A2 =1

Vio = 0, when A1=1 A2 =0 or A1=0 A2 =1

Vio = -Vdc/2, when A1 =A2 =0

Where i = a, b or c

The reference control signals are phase shift 120 degree each other with same amplitude for three

phase system. Two carrier waves are in phase each other with dc voltage offset. Two important

parameters of the design process are amplitude modulation index ma = Vr/Vc,

Page 6: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 393

where Vr is the amplitude of reference control signals, Vc is the peak amplitude of the carrier wave,

and the frequency modulation index mf = fc/fr where fc is the frequency of the carrier wave and fc is

the carrier frequency.

4. Simulation Results:

Simulation of three phase H-bridge inverter using sinusoidal pulse width modulation was carried out

with the help of “MATLAB”. Simulation was carried out to observe the improvement in the line

voltage THD for RL load of three level and five level H-bridge inverter and it also observed that the

output is nearly equal to sine wave.

Table 1: Inverter parameters

DC Bus Voltage 100 V

Carrier frequency 1 kHz

Figure 6: Phase Voltage of 3-Level Inverter

Figure 7: Phase Voltage of 5-Level Inverter

Page 7: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 394

Figure 8: Output Voltage of 3-Level Inverter

Figure 9: Output Voltage for 5-level Inverter

Figure 10: Harmonic spectrum Line Voltage of 3-level inverter for R=10ohm and L=10H

Page 8: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 395

Figure 11: Harmonic spectrum Line Voltage of 5-level inverter for R=10ohm and L=10H

5. Hardware Implementation Of Single Phase Three Level Inverter:

The main steps which are followed while implementation of hardware is explain as below:

i. CONTROL CIRCUIT

ii. DRIVER CIRCUIT

iii. POWER CIRCUIT

6. Design of Control Circuit:

Figure 12: Basic Scheme For Control Circuit

Page 9: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 396

Figure 13: Triangular Wave Generating Circuit

Figure 14: Setup for Triangular wave Generation Circuit

Page 10: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 397

Figure 15

Figure 16: Output of Control Circuit

Page 11: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 398

7. Design Of Deadband And Opto-Isolator Circuit (Driver Circuit):

Deadband circuitry allows accurate control of the deadband time to eliminate cross conduction.

Figure 17: deadband circuit while falling edge

Figure 18: deadband circuit while rising edge

Page 12: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 399

Figure 19: Pin Diagram of Driver IC (TLP 250)

For providing opto-isolation between the power stage and the drive signal stage, the opto-isolator

driver IC TLP 250 is used.

Following reasons justify the advantages of using TLP 250.

i. Input threshold voltage current If = 5mA (max)

ii. Supply Voltage 10V-35V

iii. Output Peak current 2A

iv. Response speed 0.5µs

v. Isolation voltage 2500Vrms

Figure 20: Output of Driver Circuit with Deadband

Page 13: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 400

8. Design Of Power Circuit:

Figure 21: Design of Power Circuit

Figure 22: Final Setup

Page 14: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 401

Figure 23: Output of Single Phase Three Level Inverter

9. Conclusion:

LEVEL Thee Level Five

Level

% THD 42.02 21.63

Table 2: % THD analysis

From this analysis, it has shown that decrease in THD from three level inverter to five level inverter.

In this paper the performance of both inverters was tested using RL load in MATLAB simulation.

The simulation of the inverter namely Three Level and Five level H-bridge Inverter has been carried

out, and compare it’s results and it was shown that the output voltage levels are increased as the level

of inverters are increase, and output voltage approaches near sine wave, to get the higher voltage and

reduced Total Harmonic Distortion.

Page 15: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 402

References:

1. Muhammad H. Rashid, “Power electronic circuits, devices and applications”, 3rd edition

2003, Pearson Education Inc., chapter 9, pp 406-430.

2. J. Rodriguez, J. Lai, and F. Peng, “Multilevel inverters: A survey of topologies, controls and

applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 724–738, Aug. 2002.

3. M. M. Renge and H. M. Suryawanshi, “Five-level diode clamped inverter to eliminate

common mode voltage and reduce dv/dt in medium voltage rating induction motor drives,”

IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 23,no. 4, pp. 1598–1607, Jul. 2008.

4. Kapil Jain, Pradyumn Chaturvedi , “ MATLAB -based Simulation & Analysis of Three -level

SPWM Inverter” International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE) ISSN:

2231-2307, Volume-2, Issue-1, March 2012,pp. 56-59

5. L. M. Tolbert, F. Z. Peng, and T. Habetler, “Multilevel Converters for Large Electric drives,”

IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat.,vol.35,pp. 36-44, Jan./Feb. 1999.

6. T.Prathiba, P.Renuga “A comparative study of Total Harmonic Distortion in Multilevel

inverter topologies in the paper” Journal of Information Engineering and Applications ISSN

2224-5782 (print) ISSN 2225-0506 (online) Volume- 2, No.3, 2012, pp.26-36.

7. Pardasani Hitendra K. Arora Kapildev N. “Simulation of Three Level Inverter Using

Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation Technique by MATLAB” in National Conference on

Recent Trends in Engineering & Technology.

8. B.Shanthi and S.P.Natarajan, “Comparative Study on Carrier Overlapping PWM Strategies

for Five Level Flying Capacitor Inverter”, International Journal of Science and Techniques of

Automatic control & Computer Engineering, IJ-STA,Volume 4,No.1,July 2010.pp 1158-1173

9. [9] Xiaoming Yuan, Ivo Barbi, “ Soft-Switched Three-Level Capacitor Clamping Inverter

with Clamping Voltage Stabilization,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Electronics, vol. 36,

no. 4,July/Aug. 2002, pp. 1165-1173

10. R. Chibani, E.M. Berkouk and M.S. Boucherit, “Input DC Voltages of Three-level Neutral

Point Clamped Voltage Source Inverter Balancing Using a New Kind of Clamping Bridge”,

International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 5, October, 2010

1793-8163.pp 879-886

11. Pradyumn Chaturvedi, Shailendra Jain and Pramod Agrawal, “Modeling, Simulation and

Analysis of Three-Level Neutral Point Clamped Inverter Using Matlab/Simulink/Power

System Blockset”, Eighth International Conference on1223-122727-29 Sept. 2005

Page 16: comparision of simulation results three level and five level inverter and hardware implementation of single phase three level inrter

April, 2013 www.ijirs.com Vol 2 Issue 4

International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies Page 403

12. Santiago Cobreces, , Josep Bordonau, , Joan Salaet, Emilio J. Bueno and Francisco J.

Rodriguez,“ Exact Linearization Nonlinear Neutral-Point Voltage Control for Single-Phase

Three-Level NPC Converters”, IEEE Trans. on power electronics, VOL. 24, NO. 10,

OCTOBER2009

13. Yang Han, Lin Xu, Gang Yao, Li-Dan Zhou, Mansoor, Chen Chen, “Operation Principles

and Control Strategies of Cascaded H-bridge Multilevel Active Power Filter”, ISSN 1392 –

1215 ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 2009. No. 3(91