comparison between vertical and horizontal kaplan machines

1
Comparison between Vertical and Horizontal Kaplan machines Sl.No Vertical Full Kaplan Horizontal Full Kaplan 1 Efficiency is more in rated load Efficiency is less in rated load 2 Power house is compact in size Power house is bigger in size with regard to span compared to vertical 3 Crane span is less Crane span is more 4 Runaway speed is less Runaway speed is more 5 Best suitable for very low head Generally suitable for lower head over and above 5 mtrs 6 Civil Excavation is very less Needs deeper excavation due to S-bend in the Draft tube 7 Civil Cost will be lesser due to less span and size of the power house Civil cost relatively higher due to bigger span and size of the power house 8 Chances of flooding (i.e. gear Box, generator & OPU etc) is very remote as most of the equipments are over and above the turbine on platform(Base frame) Chances of flooding (i.e. gear Box, generator & OPU etc) is high as most of the equipments are located in the same elevation 9 Less vibrations as turbine shaft required is small in length Prone to vibrations if alignment is not proper due to lengthy shaft on turbine 10 Dewatering will be easier for maintenance on runner assembly as the setting is positive Dewatering takes longer time and may have a issue if the upstream & downstream gates are not full leak proof NOTE: In lieu of the above explanations, it would be better to opt for vertical configuration for low heads to have higher efficiency, greater stability and safety of Equipment. Hence Vertical Option Considered

Upload: rajfab

Post on 20-Nov-2015

250 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

comparison

TRANSCRIPT

  • Comparison between Vertical and Horizontal Kaplan machines

    Sl.No Vertical Full Kaplan Horizontal Full Kaplan

    1 Efficiency is more in rated load Efficiency is less in rated load

    2 Power house is compact in size

    Power house is bigger in size with regard to span

    compared to vertical

    3 Crane span is less Crane span is more

    4 Runaway speed is less Runaway speed is more

    5 Best suitable for very low head

    Generally suitable for lower head over and above 5

    mtrs

    6 Civil Excavation is very less

    Needs deeper excavation due to S-bend in the Draft

    tube

    7

    Civil Cost will be lesser due to less span and

    size of the power house

    Civil cost relatively higher due to bigger span and

    size of the power house

    8

    Chances of flooding (i.e. gear Box, generator &

    OPU etc) is very remote as most of the

    equipments are over and above the turbine on

    platform(Base frame)

    Chances of flooding (i.e. gear Box, generator & OPU

    etc) is high as most of the equipments are located in

    the same elevation

    9

    Less vibrations as turbine shaft required is

    small in length

    Prone to vibrations if alignment is not proper due to

    lengthy shaft on turbine

    10

    Dewatering will be easier for maintenance on

    runner assembly as the setting is positive

    Dewatering takes longer time and may have a issue

    if the upstream & downstream gates are not full leak

    proof

    NOTE:

    In lieu of the above explanations, it would be better to opt for vertical configuration for low heads to

    have higher efficiency, greater stability and safety of Equipment.

    Hence Vertical Option Considered