comparison of methods to load a mirror magneto-optical trap
DESCRIPTION
Comparison of Methods to Load a Mirror Magneto-Optical Trap. Capstone Talk PHYS 4300. Date: 14 May 2009 Author: C. Erin Savell Advisors: Dr. Shaffer and Arne Schwettmann Acknowledgement: Jonathan Tallant , Adrienne Wade, Herbert Grotewohl , Ernest Sanchez. Outline. Motivation - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Comparison of Methods to Load a
Mirror Magneto-Optical Trap
Date: 14 May 2009Author: C. Erin SavellAdvisors: Dr. Shaffer and Arne SchwettmannAcknowledgement: Jonathan Tallant, Adrienne Wade, Herbert Grotewohl, Ernest Sanchez
Capstone Talk
PHYS 4300
Outline
•Motivation
•Atom Interferometry
•Magneto Optical Trap (MOT)
•Cooling and trapping transition
•Mirror MOT
•My worko Measuring MOT characteristics
o Measuring MOT loading rates
o Discussion of results
•Questions
http://weblogs.newsday.com/sports/watchdog/blog/satellite-radio.jpg
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/fighter/f22/f22_09.jpg
Motivation
•To streamline MOT formation process; better MOTs allow better atom chip experiments
•Atom chip allows faster, cheaper BEC (Bose-Einstein Condensate) formationo requires less equipment and gets steeper magnetic field
gradients
•Atom interferometry can beat current methods used for inertial navigation by orders of magnitude, but systems need to be compact
Graphic courtesy of H. Grotewohl
What is an Interferometer?
•Interferometer: instrument that separates beam of light into two and recombines them resulting in an interference pattern
•Resulting pattern can be used to measure wavelength, index of refraction, or astronomical distances (Measures Phase shifts -> phase to intensity conversion)
•A high precision method to measure speed of light and acceleration
•Can be used for navigation gyroscope for inertial guidanceo Will replace laser interferometers/gyroscopes
•Atom Interferometry more sensitive than with light = BETTERo Atoms move at finite speed << c
o Longer sampling time
o more time to experience inertial changes
Atom Interferometry: Why
Mirror assembly for laser interferometer
www.answers.com/topic/michelson-interferometer
Ring laser gyroscope
Fiber optic gyroscope
www.aerospaceweb.org/question/weapons/q0187.shtml
Atom Interferometry: How
•Atom well formed in MOT or other similar means
•Radio frequency (RF) current passed through a nearby wireo Causes wavefunctions in trap to
change shape, spliting from “single well” of atoms to “double well”
•Atom wavefunctions recombineo Absorption imaging can detect
resulting interference pattern
Graphic courtesy of H. Grotewohl
Atomic Wave Functions (split-> superposition)
MOT
Graphic courtesy of H. Grotewohl
Laser Orientation in a MOT
(red= laser)
PhotonΔP
Atom
ΔP
ΔP
Animation courtesy of Ernie Sanchez
MOT Animation
Mirror MOT
•Same principle as a basic MOT, but uses a mirror to reflect the laser
•Easier for trapping atoms near a surface
•Provides good source of cold atoms for loading of atom chip microtrapso Atom chips can be used as the mirror
in a mirror MOT
Schmiedmayer Paper, p. 4
Atom chip surface
Mirror MOT on atom chip (red= laser, gray=chip/mirror)
Graphic courtesy of H. Grotewohl
Cooling and Trapping Transitions of Rb-87
http://jilawww.colorado.edu/pubs/thesis/du/
•Cooling laser: red-detuned to compensate for Doppler shift
•Repumping laser: recycles atoms from ground state back into cooling transition
Our Mirror MOT Image courtesy of Arne Schwettmann
MOT
Future cooling block location Mirror
(or atom chip mount)
•Rb-85 atoms in mirror MOT
•Located 4.8mm below mirror surface
•No chip in chamber yet; just mirror
•T=~200μK
•FWHM 1.6mm vertically, 0.6mm horizontally
Mirror MOT Chamber Setup
CCD Camera
Main Chamber
Anti-Helmholtz Coils
Factors Affecting MOT Stability
•Background Pressure: ambient pressure inside chambero Pressure too low -> smaller number of atoms in MOT
o Pressure too high -> increased atom collisions shorten MOT lifetime by knocking atoms out of trap
•Laser Lock:o Necessity to minimize signal noise
o Stable lock = stable MOT
o No lock = no MOT
Rubidium Source
Saes Getters S. p. A Catalog, p. 10
Image courtesy of Arne Schwettmann
•Source controlled by current
•Normally ~5.3A
•Attaches by a mount on a flange that has electrical feed-throughs
•Releases Rb from solid state to a gaseous state
My Work
•Goal: to make higher quality MOT for loading chip trap
•Count number of atoms in MOTo The more atoms the better
•Measure density of atoms in MOTo Denser is better
•Measure loading rate of MOTo Will compare rate and background
pressure of 3 different MOT loading methods
MOT in Shaffer Lab
Image courtesy of Arne Schwettmann
Atom Number and Density in a MOT
•Calibrate photodiode with power meter (measure in volts)
•Measure intensity of light (power, P) emitted from MOT and detuning of laser beams with power meter
•Solve for PTOT
•Deduce the number of atoms by calculation
•Number of atoms and MOT volume used to calculate density
Variable Description
a = lens focal length
d = lens diameter
α = reduction factor of glass
P = measured power
Pa = PTOT =
power per atom (constant)power emitted by MOT
N = number of atoms in MOT
Photodiode Calibration Setup
iris linear polarizer
beam splitter
beam direction
power meter
photo diode
MOT Loading Rate Measurement•Fast loading rate and low background pressure are goals
•Compare rates and background pressure of 3 loading methods:o Continuous: source on nonstop
o Pulsed: source pulsed on/off
o UV-LIAD (Ultra-violet Light Induced Adsorption Desorption): UV lamp used to desorb Rubidium atoms from windows/sides of chamber
Diode lasers from MOT setup
Building a UV LED Array for UV-LIAD
•Built UV-LED array
•Assembled circuit to support LED array
•Tested circuit and assembled it in front of chamber window
UV LED array
circuit
Rubidium Source Continuously “on”
•Utilizes lower current (~3A)
•Slower, more controlled loading rate
UV LIAD Rates
•Rubidium source switched off
•UV LED array switched on for entire loading period
•Rb atoms on chamber walls become excited, adsorb from walls into gas, load MOT
Pulsed Source
Experimental Parameters•The laser lockpoint was maintained at δ =-
10.7±1.6MHz from the trapping transition 85Rb 5 S1/2� F
= 3 5 P3/2� F = 4
•Background pressure of chamber was maintained near 2.0x10-10 Torr
Image courtesy of Arne Schwettmann
F= 2 & 4 F= 3 & 4
F= 4
RESULTS
UV-LIAD, Continuous, and Background MOT Loading Methods•Background rate is slowest
•UV-LIAD improves atom number by factor of 2
•Continuous source best of the three
Background fitted curveUV LIAD fitted curveUV LIAD
Background pressure
ContinuousContinuous *Error in all data points measured is +/- 13%
Pulsed Source MOT Loading Methods
•10A current pulse gives fastest loading rateo 10 times faster than
continuous, fastest overall
•5A current half has fast, twice as long, smaller atom number present in trap
2s pulse fitted curve4s pulse fitted curve4s pulse
2s pulse
*Error in all data points measured is +/- 13%
Questions?