comparison of single and triple quadrupole gc-ms ... · comparison of ingle and riple quadrupole...

4
Comparison of Single and Triple Quadrupole GC-MS Instruments for Full Scan Analysis of Semivolatile Organic Compounds Amit Gujar, 1 Paul Silcock, 2 and Alexander Semyonov 1 1 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Austin, TX, USA; 2 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Runcorn, UK Technical Note 10431 Key Words Full Scan Acquisition, LOD, Semivolatile Organic Compounds, Spectral Quality Introduction Single quadrupole mass spectrometers, such as the Thermo Scientific ISQ Series GC-MS system, are a popular choice among analysts using GC-MS for compound identification and quantitation in relatively simple matrices. However, triple quadrupole mass spectrometers such as the Thermo Scientific TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS and TSQ 8000 Evo GC-MS/MS systems have been gaining popularity due to their high selectivity and lower detection limits, especially in complex matrices. The higher cost of triple quadrupole instruments is one of the main barriers to their adoption by analytical labs, however, the cost differential between single and triple quadrupole mass spectrometers has decreased in recent years such that today, triple quadrupole instruments are a viable alternative to their single quadrupole counterparts. 1 An obvious concern for analysts considering using triple quadrupole GC-MS systems to perform single quadrupole GC-MS workflows is how the full scan performance of the triple quadrupole GC-MS/MS compares to that of the single quadrupole system. In this work, full scan performance of the TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS system is compared to that of the ISQ GC-MS system for full spectrum acquisition of semivolatile organic compounds. Limits of Detection (LOD) and spectral quality (as defined by search-match results of NIST 14 Mass Spectral Library) were chosen as the criteria for comparison. Goal To compare the full scan acquisition performance of the TSQ Duo triple quadrupole instrument with that of the ISQ single quadrupole instrument with respect to limits of detection (LOD) and spectral quality of semivolatile organic compounds Experimental Sample and sample preparation: Use Restek 8270 MegaMix ® as the source of semivolatile organic compounds for analysis. This mixture contains 76 compounds. All but two of these compounds are at 1000 µg/mL concentrations. The other two compounds, 3-methylphenol and 4-methylphenol, are at 500 µg/mL. More details of these compounds can be found at http://www.restek.com/catalog/view/5744. Use dichloromethane (DCM) extract of the soil matrix to dilute the MegaMix ® to 1 µg/mL. Use the DCM extract of soil to take advantage of the matrix-induced chromatographic response enhancement phenomena. 2 Prepare the extract as follows: Place 10 g of clean loam soil (Fluka mfr. no. CLNLOAM6-100g) in a screw-top vial with a PTFE liner on the cap and add 10 mL DCM.

Upload: tranphuc

Post on 18-Feb-2019

255 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparison of Single and Triple Quadrupole GC-MS ... · Comparison of ingle and riple Quadrupole GC-M Instruments for Full can Analysis of emivolatile Organic Compounds Amit Gujar,

Comparison of Single and Triple Quadrupole GC-MS Instruments for Full Scan Analysis of Semivolatile Organic CompoundsAmit Gujar,1 Paul Silcock,2 and Alexander Semyonov1 1Thermo Fisher Scientific, Austin, TX, USA; 2Thermo Fisher Scientific, Runcorn, UK

Techn

ical No

te 104

31

Key WordsFull Scan Acquisition, LOD, Semivolatile Organic Compounds, Spectral Quality

IntroductionSingle quadrupole mass spectrometers, such as the Thermo Scientific™ ISQ™ Series GC-MS system, are a popular choice among analysts using GC-MS for compound identification and quantitation in relatively simple matrices. However, triple quadrupole mass spectrometers such as the Thermo Scientific™ TSQ™ Duo GC-MS/MS and TSQ™ 8000 Evo GC-MS/MS systems have been gaining popularity due to their high selectivity and lower detection limits, especially in complex matrices.

The higher cost of triple quadrupole instruments is one of the main barriers to their adoption by analytical labs, however, the cost differential between single and triple quadrupole mass spectrometers has decreased in recent years such that today, triple quadrupole instruments are a viable alternative to their single quadrupole counterparts.1

An obvious concern for analysts considering using triple quadrupole GC-MS systems to perform single quadrupole GC-MS workflows is how the full scan performance of the triple quadrupole GC-MS/MS compares to that of the single quadrupole system. In this work, full scan performance of the TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS system is compared to that of the ISQ GC-MS system for full spectrum acquisition of semivolatile organic compounds. Limits of Detection (LOD) and spectral quality (as defined by search-match results of NIST 14 Mass Spectral Library) were chosen as the criteria for comparison.

Goal

To compare the full scan acquisition performance of the TSQ Duo triple quadrupole instrument with that of the ISQ single quadrupole instrument with respect to limits of detection (LOD) and spectral quality of semivolatile organic compounds

ExperimentalSample and sample preparation: Use Restek 8270 MegaMix® as the source of semivolatile organic compounds for analysis. This mixture contains 76 compounds. All but two of these compounds are at 1000 µg/mL concentrations. The other two compounds, 3-methylphenol and 4-methylphenol, are at 500 µg/mL. More details of these compounds can be found at http://www.restek.com/catalog/view/5744.

Use dichloromethane (DCM) extract of the soil matrix to dilute the MegaMix® to 1 µg/mL. Use the DCM extract of soil to take advantage of the matrix-induced chromatographic response enhancement phenomena.2

Prepare the extract as follows: Place 10 g of clean loam soil (Fluka mfr. no. CLNLOAM6-100g) in a screw-top vial with a PTFE liner on the cap and add 10 mL DCM.

Page 2: Comparison of Single and Triple Quadrupole GC-MS ... · Comparison of ingle and riple Quadrupole GC-M Instruments for Full can Analysis of emivolatile Organic Compounds Amit Gujar,

2 Shake the vial using a wrist-action shaker (Burrell Scientific Model 75) for 30 minutes. Allow the mixture to settle for 30 minutes, and then remove the DCM extract from the soil using a glass pipette. Add 10 mL DCM to the same soil matrix and repeat the shaking and DCM extract removal process two more times.

Dry the DCM extract over sodium sulfate. Use Thermo Scientific™ eVol™ Sample Dispensing System to dilute MegaMix to 1 µg/mL using the DCM extract prepared above. Store the sample in a refrigerator at 1.5 °C in a National Scientific Target DP® vial (C4000-2W) until it is ready to be injected into the GC-MS.

GC-MS conditions: Use a TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS system and an ISQ GC-MS system, each mated to a Thermo Scientific™ TRACE™ 1310 GC and an AI/AS 1310 autosampler. Table 1 shows the autosampler, GC, and MS parameters used for the experiment.

Table 1. Autosampler, GC, and MS parameters used for the experiment.

Perform 10 sample injections on both the TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS and the ISQ GC-MS using the prepared 1 µg/mL MegaMix mixture. Choose a suitable quantitative ion that is unique to the compound and not included in the coeluting compounds. In most cases, the quantitative ion is the base peak for the compound. Calculate the LOD of the compounds by statistical analysis using the two-tailed student t-distribution at a 99% confidence interval for 10 back-to-back injections. Use the Thermo Scientific™ Dionex™ Chromeleon™ 7.2 SR1 CDS software for qualitative and quantitative data analysis.

AI/AS 1310

Syringe 10 µL, 25 gauge, 50 mm length, cone tip (P/N 36500525)

Injection Volume 1 µL

Plunger Strokes 3

Viscous Sample No

Sampling Depth Bottom

Pre-/Post-Injection Dwell Time 0.0

Pre-Injection Solvent, Cycles Dichloromethane, 2

Sample Rinses 2

Post-Injection Solvent, Cycles Dichloromethane, 3

TRACE 1310 GC

Column TG-5SILMS 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm

Liner Restek Sky® Inlet liner, splitless single taper gooseneck with wool, 4 mm × 6.5 mm × 76.5 mm

SSL Mode Splitless with surge

Inlet Temperature 270 °C

Split Flow 100 mL/min

Splitless Time 0.6 min

Surge Pressure 207 kPa

Surge Duration 0.6 min

Septum Purge Flow Constant flow of 5.0 mL/min

Carrier Flow Constant He flow of 1.2 mL/min

Oven Program 40 °C (1 min), 25 °C/min to 280 °C, 5 °C/min to 320 °C (1 min)

TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS and ISQ GC-MS

Method Type Acquisition – General

MS Transfer Line Temperature 280 °C

Ion Source Temperature 280 °C

Ionization Mode EI, 70 eV

Emission Current 50 µA

Scan Start At 2.4 min

Scan Range 35–550 amu

Scan Time 0.2 s

Chrom. Filter Peak Width 1.0 s

Use Last Tuned Detector Gained? Yes

Tuning Used EI Standard tune for TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS and EI Full tune for ISQ GC-MS (with 219 intensity set to 20 million)

Page 3: Comparison of Single and Triple Quadrupole GC-MS ... · Comparison of ingle and riple Quadrupole GC-M Instruments for Full can Analysis of emivolatile Organic Compounds Amit Gujar,

3

Figure 3. Limits of detection comparison on selected compounds on the TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS and the ISQ GC-MS.

Figure 2. Comparing mass spectra of Benzyl butyl phthalate on the TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS and the ISQ GC-MS.

Figure 1. Comparing chromatograms for injections done on the TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS and the ISQ GC-MS.

Results and DiscussionFigure 1 shows the chromatograms for the full scan analyses run on the TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS and the ISQ GC-MS. The chromatograms look similar both in terms of the order of elution of components and their relative intensities. Figure 2 shows the comparison of mass spectra of Benzyl butyl phthalate on the TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS and the ISQ Series instrument. The fragmentation patterns and the relative intensities of the mass fragments are similar on both the systems.

LOD results: Figure 3 compares the results for the LODs for selected semivolatile organic compounds on the TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS and the ISQ GC-MS systems. The LODs for both are similar with 39 compounds showing lower LODs for the TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS than the ISQ GC-MS. The average % RSDs for the quantitative ion areas of 10 consecutive injections for the TSQ Duo system was 4.2% compared to 3.6% for the ISQ instrument.

2.4 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 19.7

Minutes

–5.0e70.0e0

5.0e8

Inten

sity [

coun

ts]

1 µg/mL Restek 8270 MegaMix® on TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS Duo

Inten

sity [

coun

ts]2.6 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 19.7

Minutes

–1.0e80.0e0

1.0e9

1 µg/mL Restek 8270 MegaMix® on ISQ GC-MS

35 100 200 300 400 500 550Mass [m/z]

−20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Rel.

Inten

sity [

%]

91.1

149.1

206.1

Rel.

Inten

sity [

%]

35 100 200 300 400 500 550Mass [m/z]

−20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

91

149

206

0

50

100

150

200

250

Phen

ol

Bis(

2-ch

loro

ethyl)

ether

1,

3-Di

chlo

robe

nzen

e 1,

4-Di

chlo

robe

nzen

e Be

nzyl

alcoh

ol

1,2-

Dich

loro

benz

ene

2,2'

-oxy

bis(

1-ch

loro

prop

ane)

2-M

ethyl

phen

ol

Hexa

chlo

roeth

ane

Nitro

benz

ene

Isoph

oron

e Bi

s(2-

chlo

roeth

oxy)

meth

ane

1,2,

4-Tr

ichlo

robe

nzen

e Na

phth

alene

4-

Chlo

roan

iline

He

xach

loro

butad

iene

4-Ch

loro

-3-m

ethylp

heno

l 2-

Meth

ylnap

htha

lene

1-M

ethyln

apht

halen

e 2-

Chlo

rona

phth

alene

Di

meth

ylpht

halat

e 2,

6-Di

nitro

tolu

ene

Acen

apht

hylen

e 3-

Nitro

anili

ne

Acen

apht

hene

4-

Nitro

phen

ol

2,4-

Dini

troto

luen

e Di

benz

ofur

an

Dieth

ylpht

halat

e Di

phen

ylam

ine

Azob

enze

ne

4-Br

omop

heny

l phe

nyl e

ther

He

xach

loro

benz

ene

Phen

anth

rene

An

thra

cene

Ca

rbaz

ole

Di-n

-but

ylpht

halat

e Fl

uora

nthe

ne

Pyre

ne

Bis(

2-eth

ylhex

yl)ad

ipate

Be

nz(a

)ant

hrac

ene

Benz

o(b)

fluor

anth

ene

Benz

o(k)

fluor

anth

ene

Benz

o(a)

pyre

ne

Dibe

nz(a

,h)a

nthr

acen

e Be

nzo(

g,h,

i)per

ylene

TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS

ISQ GC-MS

LOD,

pg/

µL

Page 4: Comparison of Single and Triple Quadrupole GC-MS ... · Comparison of ingle and riple Quadrupole GC-M Instruments for Full can Analysis of emivolatile Organic Compounds Amit Gujar,

Tech

nica

l No

te 1

04

31

TN10431-EN 0115S

Spectral quality results: Figure 4 shows the results for the search-match for chromatographically resolved components of the mixture with the NIST 14 mass spectral library. The TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS and the ISQ GC-MS have a match factor greater than 900 for 59 and 64 compounds, respectively. Both the TSQ Duo instrument and the ISQ system show 66 number one hits. These results show that the spectral quality for the TSQ Duo and the ISQ systems are similar, with both having excellent matching factors with the NIST 14 Mass Spectral Library.

ConclusionFull scan comparison of the TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS and the ISQ GC-MS systems for 1 µg/mL Restek 8270 MegaMix shows that LODs for both instruments are similar, with 39 compounds having lower LODs on the TSQ Duo system. Additionally, the % RSD on the areas of the quantitative ions for most of the analytes was less than 5%. The spectral quality of the analytes, as measured by matching with NIST 14 Mass Spectral Library, was excellent, with 66 compounds having number one hits on both the TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS system and the ISQ GC-MS system.

Figure 4. Spectral quality comparison using the NIST 14 library for the TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS and the ISQ GC-MS.

References1. Mass Spectrometry: Limitless Innovation in Analytical

Science; SDi; Los Angeles, CA; October 2013.

2. Hajšlová, J.; Zrostlíková, J. Matrix effects in (ultra)trace analysis of pesticide residue in food and biotic matrices. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 181–197.

AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge helpful discussions with David Steiniger and Jason Cole.

600

650

700

750

800

850

900

950

1000

Phen

ol

Bis(

2-ch

loro

ethyl)

ether

1,

3-Di

chlo

robe

nzen

e 1,

4-Di

chlo

robe

nzen

e Be

nzyl

alcoh

ol

1,2-

Dich

loro

benz

ene

2-M

ethyl

phen

ol

2,2'

-oxy

bis(

1-ch

loro

prop

ane)

He

xach

loro

ethan

e Ni

trobe

nzen

e Iso

phor

one

Bis(

2-ch

loro

ethox

y)m

ethan

e 1,

2,4-

Trich

loro

benz

ene

Naph

thale

ne

4-Ch

loro

anili

ne

Hexa

chlo

robu

tadien

e 4-

Chlo

ro-3

-meth

ylphe

nol

2-M

ethyln

apht

halen

e 1-

Meth

ylnap

htha

lene

2-Ch

loro

naph

thale

ne

Dim

ethylp

htha

late

2,6-

Dini

troto

luen

e Ac

enap

hthy

lene

3-Ni

troan

iline

Ac

enap

hthe

ne

4-Ni

troph

enol

2,

4-Di

nitro

tolu

ene

Dibe

nzof

uran

Di

ethylp

htha

late

Diph

enyla

min

e Az

oben

zene

4-

Brom

ophe

nyl p

heny

l eth

er

Hexa

chlo

robe

nzen

e Ph

enan

thre

ne

Anth

race

ne

Carb

azol

e Di

-n-b

utylp

htha

late

Fluo

rant

hene

Py

rene

Bi

s(2-

ethylh

exyl)

adip

ate

Benz

(a)a

nthr

acen

e Be

nzo(

b)flu

oran

then

e Be

nzo(

k)flu

oran

then

e Be

nzo(

a)py

rene

Di

benz

(a,h

)ant

hrac

ene

Benz

o(g,

h,i)p

eryle

ne

NIST

14

Libr

ary M

atch

TSQ Duo GC-MS/MS

ISQ GC-MS

Africa +43 1 333 50 34 0Australia +61 3 9757 4300Austria +43 810 282 206Belgium +32 53 73 42 41Canada +1 800 530 8447China 800 810 5118 (free call domestic)

400 650 5118

Denmark +45 70 23 62 60Europe-Other +43 1 333 50 34 0Finland +358 9 3291 0200France +33 1 60 92 48 00Germany +49 6103 408 1014India +91 22 6742 9494Italy +39 02 950 591

Japan +81 45 453 9100Korea +82 2 3420 8600Latin America +1 561 688 8700Middle East +43 1 333 50 34 0Netherlands +31 76 579 55 55New Zealand +64 9 980 6700Norway +46 8 556 468 00

Russia/CIS +43 1 333 50 34 0Singapore +65 6289 1190Spain +34 914 845 965Sweden +46 8 556 468 00Switzerland +41 61 716 77 00UK +44 1442 233555USA +1 800 532 4752

www.thermoscientific.com©2015 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. ISO is a trademark of the International Standards Organization. MegaMix and Sky are registered trademarks of Restek Corporation. All other trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries. This information is presented as an example of the capabilities of Thermo Fisher Scientific products. It is not intended to encourage use of these products in any manners that might infringe the intellectual property rights of others. Specifications, terms and pricing are subject to change. Not all products are available in all countries. Please consult your local sales representative for details.

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Austin, TX USA is ISO 9001:2008 Certified.