comparisonofmeasuredrainattenuationinthe12.25ghz...
TRANSCRIPT
Hindawi Publishing CorporationInternational Journal of Antennas and PropagationVolume 2012, Article ID 415398, 5 pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/415398
Research Article
Comparison of Measured Rain Attenuation in the 12.25 GHzBand with Predictions by the ITU-R Model
Dong You Choi,1 Jae Young Pyun,1 Sun Kuh Noh,2 and Sang Woong Lee3
1 Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Chosun University, No. 375 Seosuk-dong, Dong-gu,Gwangju 501-759, Republic of Korea
2 Department of Radio Mobile Communications Engineering, Honam University, No. 330 Eodeungno, Gwangsan-gu,Gwangju 506-714, Republic of Korea
3 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chosun University, No. 375 Seosuk-dong, Dong-gu,Gwangju 501-759, Republic of Korea
Correspondence should be addressed to Sun Kuh Noh, [email protected]
Received 22 February 2011; Revised 19 July 2011; Accepted 20 July 2011
Academic Editor: Mandeep Jit Singh
Copyright © 2012 Dong You Choi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons AttributionLicense, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properlycited.
Quantitative analysis and prediction of radio attenuation is necessary in order to improve the reliability of satellite-earth commu-nication links and for economically efficient design. For this reason, many countries have made efforts to develop their own rainattenuation prediction models that are suited to their rain environment. In this paper, we present the results of measurements ofrain-induced attenuation in vertically polarized signals propagating at 12.25 GHz during certain rain events, which occurred inthe rainy wet season of 2001 and 2007 at Yong-in, Korea. The rain attenuation over the link path was measured experimentally andcompared with the attenuation obtained using the ITU-R model.
1. Introduction
Microwave signals propagating through the atmosphere areattenuated by vapor, fog, oxygen, rain, and several othergases. The most severe attenuation is caused by rain; in addi-tion, at frequencies of 22 GHz or 60 GHz, signal degradationdue to vapor or oxygen increases. At high frequencies, that is,at 10 GHz or more, the attenuation due to rainfall increasesfurther [1, 2].
Many rain attenuation prediction models have been de-veloped to assist in designing effective satellite-earth commu-nication links, for example, the International Telecommuni-cation Union Radio Communication Sector (ITU-R) mod-el. These models were developed using rain attenuation sta-tistics for rainfall environments native to other countries;thus, owing to their regional peculiarities, these models couldnot be used to study the effects of rain attenuation in therainfall environment of Korea. In recent years, some cities inKorea have experienced periods of unusually heavy rainfall,which, according to climatologists, is caused by urban heat
island phenomena. Thus, it will be very interesting to see howwell the recent rain attenuation data measured in Korea com-pares with the values obtained using the ITU-R method.
2. A Brief Background on Existing Rain Rateand Rain Attenuation Models
2.1. ITU-R P.837-5 Rain Rate Model. The basic principle ofthis model [3] involves the use of a database of parameters(Pr6, Mt, and β), This database is available from the websiteof ITU’s 3M Group. Each parameter is matched to a (latitude,longitude) pair. MATLAB scripts associated with the imple-mentation of the model are available from the same website.These scripts simplify the calculation of the cumulative dis-tribution function of rain rate. The user is only required toinput the probability of exceedance value, and the latitudeand longitude of the Earth station under analysis. The meth-od to derive the rain rate exceeded for a given probability ofthe average year, and a given location is as follows [4].
2 International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
Step 1. Extract the variables (Pr6, Mt, and β) for the fourpoints closest in latitude (Lat) and longitude (Lon) to the ge-ographical coordinates of the desired location. The latitudegrid extends from +90◦N to −90◦S in steps of 1.125◦ steps;the longitude grid extends from 0◦ to 360◦ in steps of 1.125◦.
Step 2. From the values of Pr6, Mt, and β at the four gridpoints, obtain the values Pr6(Lat, Lon), Mt(Lat, Lon), andβ(Lat, Lon) at the desired location by performing a bi-linearinterpolation, as described in Recommendation ITU-RP.1144.
Step 3. Convert Mt and β to MC and MS as follows:
MC = βMt,
MS =(1− β
)Mt.
(1)
Step 4. Derive the percentage probability of rain in an aver-age year, P0, from
P0(Lat, Lon)
= Pr6(Lat, Lon)×(
1− e−0.0079(MS(Lat,Lon)/Pr6(Lat,Lon))).
(2)
If Pr6 is equal to zero, the percentage probability of rain inan average year and the rainfall rate exceeded for any percent-age of an average year are equal to zero. In this case, the fol-lowing steps are unnecessary.
Step 5. Derive the rainfall rate, Pp, exceeded for p% of the av-erage year, where p ≤ P0, from
Rp(Lat, Lon) = −B +√B2 − 4AC2A
[mm/h], (3)
where
A = ab,
B = a + cLN(
p
P0(Lat, Lon)
),
C = LN(
p
P0(Lat, Lon)
),
a = 1.09,
b = MC(Lat, Lon) + MS(Lat, Lon)21797P0
,
c = 26.02b.
(4)
2.2. ITU-R P.618-9 Rain Attenuation Model. The ITU-RP.618-9 [5] rain attenuation model uses the rain rate at 0.01%probability level for attenuation estimation. This model hasbeen derived on the basis of the log-normal distribution, andthe point rain intensity and attenuation distribution gener-ally conform to the log-normal distribution. Inhomogeneityin rain in the horizontal and vertical directions is accountedfor in the prediction. This model is applicable across the 4–55 GHz frequency range and the 0.001–5% percentage prob-
ability range. The estimates of the long-term statistics of theslant-path rain attenuation at a given location for frequenciesup to 55 GHz are obtained according to the procedure givenbelow. The following parameters are used in this procedure[4]:
R0.01: point rainfall rate for the location for 0.01% ofan average year [mm/h],
hS: height above mean sea level of the earth station[km],
θ: elevation angle [◦],
ϕ: latitude of the earth station [◦],
f : frequency [GHz],
Re: effective radius of the Earth [8,500 km].
If the local data for the height above mean sea level ofthe earth station is not available, an estimate can be obtainedfrom the maps of topographic altitudes given in Recommen-dation ITU-R P.1511.
Step 1. Determine the rain height, hR, as given in Recom-mendation ITU-R P.839.
Step 2. For θ > 5◦, compute the slant path length, LS, belowthe rain height using
LS = (hR − hS)sin θ
[km]. (5)
Step 3. Calculate the horizontal projection, LG, of the slantpath length using
LG = LS cos θ [km]. (6)
Step 4. Obtain the rainfall rate, R0.01, exceeded for 0.01%of an average year (with an integration time of 1 min). Ifthis long-term statistic cannot be obtained from local datasources, an estimate can be obtained from the maps of rain-fall rate given in Recommendation ITU-R P.837. If R0.01 isequal to zero, the predicted rain attenuation is zero for anytime percentage, and Step 5 need not be carried out.
Step 5. Obtain the specific attenuation, γR, using the fre-quency-dependent coefficients given in RecommendationITU-R P.838 and the rainfall rate, R0.01, determined fromStep 4, using
γR = k(R0.01)α [dB/km]. (7)
Step 6. Calculate the horizontal reduction factor, r0.01, for0.01% of the time
r0.01 = 1
1 + 0.78√LGγR/ f − 0.38(1− e−2LG)
. (8)
Step 7. Calculate the vertical adjustment factor, υ0.01, for0.01% of the time
ξ = tan−1(hR − hSLGr0.01
). (9)
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation 3
If ξ > θ,
LR = LGr0.01
cos θ[km]. (10)
Else,
LR =(hR − hS
sin θ
)[km]. (11)
If |ϕ| < 36◦,
χ = 36◦ − ∣∣ϕ∣∣. (12)
Else,
χ = 0◦. (13)
Therefore,
υ0.01 = 1
1 +√
sin θ[
31(1− e−(θ/(1+χ))
)√LRγR/ f 2 − 0.45
] .
(14)
Step 8. The effective path length is
LE = LRυ0.01 [km]. (15)
Step 9. The predicted attenuation exceeded for 0.01% of anaverage year is obtained using
A0.01 = γRLE [dB]. (16)
Step 10. The estimated attenuation to be exceeded for otherpercentages of an average year, in the range 0.001–5%, is de-termined from the attenuation to be exceeded for 0.01% foran average year.
If p ≥ 1% or |ϕ| ≥ 36◦,
β = 0. (17)
If p ≥ 1% or |ϕ| < 36◦ and θ ≥ 25◦,
β = −0.005(∣∣ϕ
∣∣− 36◦
). (18)
Otherwise,
β = −0.005(∣∣ϕ
∣∣− 36◦
)+ 1.8− 4.25 sin θ,
AP=A0.01
(p
0.01
)−(0.655+0.033 ln(p)−0.045 ln(A0.01)−β(1−p) sin θ)
[dB].
(19)
3. Received Beacon Signal Level and Rain Rate
In this study, we selected Koreasat-3, which uses the Ku-band(14GHz/12GHz) frequency and analyzed the beacon signallevel data according to the rain rate in 2001 [6] and 2007, re-spectively.
To measure the rain rate, we used the rain measurementsystem that was installed when the Yong-in Satellite Con-trol Office was established. The controlling equipment of Ko-reasat-3 was used to measure the beacon signal level. Block
Rain gage Data logger Modem Modem Data storage
Figure 1: Experimental system used for measuring the rain rate.
Trackingsystem
LNA
ACU(antenna control unit)
PTIC(program track interface computer)
(low-noise amplifier)
Figure 2: Experimental system used for measuring the beacon sig-nal level.
diagrams for the two measurement systems are shown inFigures 1 and 2.
As shown in Figure 1, the accumulated rain rate data isfirst collected in a data logger and then saved in a computer.The rain rate data may be saved in either 10-min or 10-sintervals. The rain rate data was collected in intervals of10-s. The 1-min rain rate, R1−min . mm/h, can be computedby the following formula using the instantaneous rain ratemeasured via a rain gauge:
R1−min . = 16
5∑
S=0
R(10S) [mm/h], (20)
where R(10S) is the instantaneous rain rate measured bya rain gauge and sampled at 10-s intervals for a particularminute.
The experimental system shown in Figure 2 saves the re-ceived beacon signal level at 1-min intervals (Table 1).
A cassegrain antenna designed specifically for Koreasat-3was used to receive the beacon signal. In order to compensatefor the changes in the power level caused by perturbation ofthe transmission from the satellite, which is located in a geo-stationary orbit, a steptrack tracking system was used.
The amount of attenuation due to rain over the path wasdetermined by measuring the deviation from the clear weath-er attenuation values at various rain rates recorded using atipping bucket rain gauge, which usually provides a good ap-proximation to the instantaneous rain rates.
4. Comparison of the Predicted andMeasured Rain Attenuation
Figure 3 provides a comparison of the statistical results ofthe rain rate obtained using the ITU-R model and the meas-ured rain rate; the rain rates obtained using the ITU-RP.837-5 model (predicted value) were lower than the rain
4 International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
Table 1: Measurement and experimental specifications.
System location
Latitude (Yong-in) 37.43◦N
Longitude (Koreasat-3) 116◦E
Elevation angle 45.20◦
Azimuth angle 198.1◦
Sea level 0.142 [km]
Climate zone ITU-R model K zone
Down linkPolarization Dual liner
EIRP 34 [dBW]
Frequency 12.25 [GHz]
AntennaType Cassegrain
Diameter7.2 m (2001), 11 m(2007)
Rain gage
Type Tipping bucket
Size Diameter 200 [mm]
Resolution 0.5 [mm]
AccuracyLess than 5%(for rain rate of10 mm/h)
Operative temperature −40◦C to +50◦C
Figure 3: Rain rate (mm/h) exceeded for 0.01% of the average year,obtained using the ITU-R P.837-5.
rates obtained by the Electronic and TelecommunicationsResearch Institute (ETRI) [7, 8] (measured value), exceptwhen the time percentage was 0.001%. The rainfall rateat 0.01% of the time, which is an important parameter topredict rain attenuation, is approximately 59 mm/h, as ob-tained by ETRI, and 50 mm/h, as suggested by the ITU-RP.837-5 model. This difference in the values indicates that therain rates obtained using the ITU-R P.837-5 model do notfully reflect Korea’s local rainfall characteristics. It has beenreported that the climate changes from the temperate to thesubtropical regions [9]. The Korea Meteorological Admin-istration (KMI) analyzed the mean rainfall for the last 10years (1998–2008) and the past 30 years (1971–2000) in 15different regions in Korea and compared the two sets of val-ues. They found a 9.1% increase compared to a normal year[10].
Thus, the ITU-R P.837-5 model gives erroneous rain ratedistributions and rain attenuation values on radio links inKorea.
1
0.1
0.01
1E−30 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Rain attenuation (dB)
Tim
epe
rcen
tage
(%)
20012007ITU-R model
Figure 4: Predicted and measured rain attenuation cumulative dis-tribution.
Figure 4 shows the actual rain attenuation measured forKoreasat-3 in 2001 and 2007 by the Yong-in Satellite ControlOffice. The rain attenuation in 2001 is similar to that in 2007.The rain attenuation values predicted by the ITU-R modelwere found to be lower than the actual values. At low rainfallrates, the difference between the predicted and actual valueswas greater.
The cumulative distribution function obtained from therain rate and the attenuation dataset was compared with thepredicted function obtained from various earth-space pathprediction models, both physical and empirical. The ITU-Rtesting variable was used as the error metric; this variable isdefined in Recommendation ITU-R P.311-11 [11] as
Vi = LN(Ap
Am
)×(Am
10
)2
for Am < 10 [dB],
Vi = LN(Ap
Am
)for other cases,
(21)
where Ap is the attenuation predicted using an ITU-R meth-od and Am is the attenuation estimated from the measureddata (both in decibels).
The model under test was ranked according to the RMSof the error. The RMS is estimated by using the formula givenbelow:
RMS =√
Mean2 + St.Dev2. (22)
The evolution of error is defined as
E = Ap − Am
Am. (23)
The error variables between the experimental and esti-mated cumulative distributions are presented in Table 2.
The error between the ITU-R model prediction and theactual value for 2001 obtained from (23) varies considerably,
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation 5
Table 2: Error, mean, standard deviation, and % RMS for each of the measured with respect to time percentage.
Percentage error between the measured and the existing model for rain attenuationMean Std. % RMS
% Time 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.5
2001 −0.33 −0.35 −0.27 −0.40 −0.53 −0.50 −0.51 −0.41 0.10 43
2007 −0.31 −0.28 −0.16 −0.36 −0.42 −0.45 −0.63 −0.37 0.15 40
the minimum value of 0.27 and the maximum value of 0.53.The error between the ITU-R model prediction and theactual value for 2007 obtained from (23) also varies consider-ably, the minimum values of 0.16 and the maximum valuesof 0.63. Furthermore, the ITU-R model prediction shows alarge difference from the actual value in RMS percentage with43% and 40% in 2001 and 2007, respectively.
From Figure 4 and Table 2, we can observe that there isa large difference between the predicted value and the actualvalue of rain attenuation. This is because the ITU-R Rec. 618-9 model first obtains the rain rate (R0.01) for time percentageof 0.01% and then extends it to the whole time percentage.Although it is necessary to obtain the exact rain rate (R0.01)for a time percentage of 0.01% to predict rain attenuation,the rain rate obtained using the ITU-R model did not reflectKorea’s local rainfall characteristics, as shown in Figure 3.
5. Conclusion
The rain attenuation in the 12.25 GHz band was measuredfor two years—2001 and 2007. The statistical characteristicsof the measured data are presented in this study. The meas-ured rain attenuation in the 12.25 GHz band in Yong-in wascompared with the rain rates predicted by the ITU-R mod-el. The main results and conclusions of this study can besummarized as follows.
(1) The rain rates obtained using the ITU-R P.837-4model were lower than those measured by the Elec-tronic and Telecommunications Research Institute(ETRI) [7, 8], except for a time percentage of 0.001%;moreover, the predicted rain rates did not reflectKorea’s local rainfall characteristics.
(2) The rain attenuation values predicted by the ITU-Rmodel were lower than the actual values, and the dif-ference was greater at lower time percentages.
(3) The ITU-R model prediction was considerably dif-ferent from the actual value in RMS percentage with49% and 47% in 2001 and 2007, respectively.
The current results will serve as good tools for satellitesystem designers in improving communication satellite sys-tems in Korea.
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by research fund from the ChosunUniversity, 2011.
References
[1] T. C. Ramadorai, “Rain attenuation and prediction in theSatellite-Earth Path,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on HFVHF and Microwave Communications, New Delhi, India,February 1987.
[2] R. K. Crane, Electromagnetic Wave Propagation through Rain,John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
[3] ITU-R P.837-5, Characteristics of precipitation for propagationmodeling, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva,Switzerland, 2007.
[4] J. S. Mandeep, “Comparison of rainfall models with Ku-bandbeacon measurement,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 64, no. 2-3, pp.264–271, 2009.
[5] ITU-R P.618-9, Propagation data and prediction methodsrequired for the design of earth-space telecommu-nicationsystems, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva,Switzerland, 2007.
[6] D. Y. Choi, “Measurement of rain attenuation of microwavesat 12.25GHz in Korea,” in the 4th International IFIP-TC6Networking Conference on Networking Technologies, Services,and Protocols; Performance of Computer and CommunicationNetworks; Mobile and Wireless Communications Systems (NET-WORKING ’05), pp. 1353–1356, May 2005.
[7] TTAS.KO-06.0122, Regional Rain-rate Distribution for KoreanTerritory, Telecommunications Technology Association,December 2006.
[8] TTAS.KO-06.0123, Conversion Method of Rain-rate Statisticsfor Various Integration Time Data, Tele-communications Tech-nology Association, December 2006.
[9] K. C. Yoon, S. C. Kim, and W. Shon, “Estimation or rain fadingfor Ka band satellite signal in Seoul area,” in the Korean Societyof Broadcasting Engineers Conference, pp. 165–168, November2008.
[10] S.Y. Sin., “South Korea, with a subtropical climate of change,”Herald, June 2009.
[11] ITU-R P.311-11, Presentation and analysis of data in studiesof tropospheric propagation, International TelecommunicationUnion, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
International Journal of
AerospaceEngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2010
RoboticsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Control Scienceand Engineering
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
International Journal of
RotatingMachinery
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com
Journal ofEngineeringVolume 2014
Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com
VLSI Design
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Shock and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Civil EngineeringAdvances in
Acoustics and VibrationAdvances in
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Journal of
Advances inOptoElectronics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
SensorsJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Modelling & Simulation in EngineeringHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Chemical EngineeringInternational Journal of Antennas and
Propagation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Navigation and Observation
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
DistributedSensor Networks
International Journal of