complex challenges …
DESCRIPTION
Complex challenges …. Laura Ahonen & Tuija Hämäläinen CCIC Kick-off meeting Sofia, 14 March 2012. CCIC – COMPONENT 3. Exchange of experiences dedicated to the identification and analysis of good practices Responsible partner of the component : City of Jyväskylä - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
COMPLEX CHALLENGES …Laura Ahonen & Tuija HämäläinenCCIC Kick-off meetingSofia, 14 March 2012
CCIC – COMPONENT 3
Exchange of experiences dedicated to the identification and analysis of good practices
Responsible partner of the component: City of Jyväskylä
Planned results: Jointly prepare Policy Recommendations and
Regional Innovation Implementation Plan for each region
Our latest INTERREG IVC experience related to CCIC
• CLIQ – Creating Local Innovation through a Quadruple Helix project, project leader
• www.cliqproject.eu• Outputs related to CCIC:
• Innovation policy action plan (project level)• Toolkit of the best practices • CLIQ-o-Meter self-evalution tool for local authorities • Academic research on the Quadruple Helix model of innovation• Baseline study of the partners’ ”state of the art”• 24 case studies on good practices• CLIQ Declaration - commitment to promote innovation locally
CCIC, CP3 Roles• PP6 Jyväskylä, as a Component 3 leader, will manage
the activities according to agreed approach and timetable
• collection of the good practices identified by all partners• prepare good practice database using the methodology developed by
PP14, as well as a template for local/regional implementation plans and best practice transferability guide.
• PP14 ARCFund, with expertise in innovation policy formulation and analysis
- is responsible for developing methodology, preparing and summarizing stakeholder questionnaires, developing an analytical innovation state-of-art report and guidelines for thematic group meetings, elaborating innovation policy recommendations.
Thematic group (TG) leaders
Themes selected for analysis and exchange of experience • 1. Innovative financial instruments (Birmingham)• 2. Public procurement and innovation (Lazio Regione)• 3. Publicly owned enterprises and innovation (Sabadell)• 4. Civil society inclusion in public innovation (Aberdeen)
Horizontal theme: • 5. Local /regional blind-spots – generalize all critical problems born
in the thematic discussions and contribute to the innovation policy recommendations
Overview of the result indicators
N° of good practices identified
6N. Analytical Study Visits report
40
N. Deep Delegation reports
Total N° of participants in all these interregional events
Target
13N° of regional/local policies and instruments addressed in the field tackled by the operation
13Number of implementation plans developed (applicable only from fourth call onward)
IndicatorsN° of interregional events (seminars, workshops, study visits, etc.) organised by the project to exchange experience
360
5
EU Innovation Policy Recommendation Report/100 copies/ 1
15
4
N° of staff members with inceased capacity (knowledge/skills/expertise) resulting from the exchange of experience at interregional events
N° of good practices successfully transferred (if applicable)
60
5N° of regional/local policies and instruments improved in the field tackled by the operation
Identification of good practices
• Methodology developed by PP14: a guide & a template
• Good practices are identified by ALL partners
• Database prepared by PP6 (on project website?)
• Transfer of 1 good practice to your own region: what would benefit you most? Discuss!
In the project application:
Output indicators of the component 2
• Analytical State-of-the-Art Report on local innovation in the public sector
• Good Practice Identification Guide• Best Practice Transferability Guide
What is done in CP2/CP3 - needs to be defined
CP3 interregional visits
Focus on the partners’ experience in 5 themes
Thematic group discussions• Study visits
• Deep Delegation visits• ”Sharing expertise and experience to present in depth the best practice
selected for adoption” • ”Partner will receive up to 3 learning partners”
CP Visit template provided by the leadpartner
CCIC Project Meetings
Kick off - Sofia
SC1
SC2 - Aberdeen MayTGM1- PP BirmSC3-GavleTGM2 - PP WarsawSC4 - WarsawTGM3- PP SabadellSC5 -GenoaTGM4 -PP TartuSC6 - Tartu
Final Conference- Catania+SC7 SepSC8 -Final -on-line Nov
Deep Delegation Nov Mar April / May July
Study Visits Nov Mar May/June July??? Oct
PMG,kickoff, f inal Sofia Aberdeen Gavle Warsaw Genoa Tartu CataniaStudy visits Birmngham Lazio Region Eindhoven Jyvaskyla?? Sabadell
Deep Delegations External Lazio Region Birmngham/ Sabadell Eindhoven
/Javaskyla
2012 2013 2014
Feb
Sept
Feb
Feb
Sept
Regional Innovation Plans
• Regional Innovation Plans for the specific features of innovation ecosystem that partners live in and work for.
• > each partner organises regional workshops
• >” RIPs will contain a clear explanation of the post 2012 intentions of the regional Managing Authorities and their partners in the respect of the CCIC methodologies and good practices imported.”
• > As a result each partner will design a pilot project to adopt another partners’ best practice after the project lifetime
Regional Innovation Plans
Policies addressed and improved?
• ”13 regional/local policies addressed in the field tackled by the operation”• Can be considered as a policy area, which each project partner is
addressing together in the project.
• ”5 regional/local policies and instruments improved”• JTS: clear evidence on impact on policy level is needed.
Overview of the first activities
Activities Jan – June 2012
P14 prepares & all discuss• Preparation of methodology &
state-of-the-art questionaire of innovation performance
• good practice template • Guidelines for TG meetings
May-June: Interviews by all partners tocollect regional data and goodpractices
Outputs Jan – June 2012
• 1 Methodology, 1 state-of-the-art questionaire, 1 good practice template prepared
• 130 interviews: 10/each partner• 50 good practices mapped• 1 methodology and 5 guidelines for
thematic groups• LP: Recruite 6 Correspondents from
outside partnership: • To collect regional data/GP, prepare
reports, participate in CCIC meetings and one of them to organize deep delegation visit ?
Overview of the first activities
Activities July – Dec 2012
July: Interviews to fill in the State-of-the-Art questionaires, GP identification ends
July-Sept: • P14: Analytical State-of-the-Art Report on
Public Sector Innovation• P6: Good Practice database• Country correspondents produce reports on
innovations based on desk research• Discussion on topics above
Sept: Thematic group meeting in Gävle on ”Innovative Financial Instruments”
Partners agree on best practices to be studied
Local meetings with policy decision-makers and stakeholders on State-of-the- Art report
Nov: Study Visit In Birmingham. Study visit report by Birmingham, feedback from the participants
Outputs July – Dec 2012
- 6 reports by correspondents of 6 non-CCIC countries
- 1 Analytical State-of-the-Art Report
- 13 local meetings
- 1 good practice database
- 1 thematic group meeting report on ”Innovative financial instruments” and ”blindspots”
- 13 best practices selected
- 1 Study Visits Program approved
- 1 analytical report on the SV backed up by 7 individual SV reports (???)
Jyväskylä’s ExperiencesGood practices…
• Good practices: INTERREG IVC Programme Managing Authority collects good practices from the Lead Partners with standardized system • Minimize double work
• There are no best practices, but many good ones. • Consider practices which could be beneficial for other partners
• Transfer of good practices is challenging: different needs and priorities, different kind of organisations etc…• Local adjustment is needed• JTS on transfers: ”practices that have actually been transferred within
the project. Only a practice introduced by one partner and that has a concrete and measurable impact on another partner”
Other thoughts …
• The responsibility to get most out of the project depends on each and every partner.
• Jyväskylä is flying the flag of the importance of the local work. • Flexibility for the local work & activities is needed.• However, don’t forget to share your doings with the network.
• Look for the possibilites for co-working with the partners. Project visits should not be the only channel for exchanging experiences and views.
Tip: Help yourself and the LP - keep your external budget lines in mind Project Application p. 54
6
1-13
12
51 400,00
none
14
1-13
none
2
EE in support to:1.TGMs and GPs identification/Eur11000/;2.TMG4 working session /Eur11000/
EE for Innovation policy recommendations development/Eur13000/&BP transferability guide development/Eur5800/
Correspondents for 6 cities/regions from the EU innovation leaders/to collect regional data/GP,prepare reports,participate in CCIC meetings and one of them to organize DD visit. none
none
none
Organization of TGM1 meeting /Eur1500/ and TGM2 meeting /Eur1000//venue,catering,equipment/
1
EE in support to: RIP development /Eur10400/ incl. pilot projects development /Eur41000/
Local meetings with key policy decisionmakers and stakeholders on RIP discussion/venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/
17 000,00
13;9
20 000,00
none
none
none
none
6Organization of 4th Study Visit and 4th Deep Delegation Visit/venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/none
Local meetings with key policy decisionmakers and stakeholders on Analytical State of the Art Report /venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/
Com
ponent 3
1-13
Organization of 3rd Study Visit and 5th Deep Delegation Visit/venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/
22 000,00
18 800,00
30 000,00
52 000,00
7 500,00
15 000,00
3
2 500,00
52 000,00
none 15 000,00
none
none
Organization of 5th Study Visit and 3rd Deep Delegation Visit/venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/7
Org.of 2nd SV and 1st DD Visit /Eur15000/;EE in TGMs and GPs identification support/Eur15000//venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/none
5;8
2 000,00
EEs in:1-enhance innov ideas to businesses Eur24883,07;2-good practices identificationEur13290/
16 000,0011
Organization of TGM3 meeting /Eur1000/ and TGM4 meeting /Eur1000//venue,catering,equipment/10;8
38 173,07
Organization of 1st Study Visit and 2nd Deep Delegation Visit/venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/
none
Organization of 6th Study Visit in non-partners’ organisation/venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/
Your thoughts and ideas?
Let’s kick-off!