complex challenges …

19
COMPLEX CHALLENGES Laura Ahonen & Tuija Hämäläinen CCIC Kick-off meeting Sofia, 14 March 2012

Upload: salali

Post on 21-Jan-2016

48 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Complex challenges …. Laura Ahonen & Tuija Hämäläinen CCIC Kick-off meeting Sofia, 14 March 2012. CCIC – COMPONENT 3. Exchange of experiences dedicated to the identification and analysis of good practices Responsible partner of the component : City of Jyväskylä - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Complex challenges  …

COMPLEX CHALLENGES …Laura Ahonen & Tuija HämäläinenCCIC Kick-off meetingSofia, 14 March 2012

Page 2: Complex challenges  …

CCIC – COMPONENT 3

Exchange of experiences dedicated to the identification and analysis of good practices

Responsible partner of the component: City of Jyväskylä

Planned results: Jointly prepare Policy Recommendations and

Regional Innovation Implementation Plan for each region

Page 3: Complex challenges  …

Our latest INTERREG IVC experience related to CCIC

• CLIQ – Creating Local Innovation through a Quadruple Helix project, project leader

• www.cliqproject.eu• Outputs related to CCIC:

• Innovation policy action plan (project level)• Toolkit of the best practices • CLIQ-o-Meter self-evalution tool for local authorities • Academic research on the Quadruple Helix model of innovation• Baseline study of the partners’ ”state of the art”• 24 case studies on good practices• CLIQ Declaration - commitment to promote innovation locally

Page 4: Complex challenges  …

CCIC, CP3 Roles• PP6 Jyväskylä, as a Component 3 leader, will manage

the activities according to agreed approach and timetable

• collection of the good practices identified by all partners• prepare good practice database using the methodology developed by

PP14, as well as a template for local/regional implementation plans and best practice transferability guide.

• PP14 ARCFund, with expertise in innovation policy formulation and analysis

- is responsible for developing methodology, preparing and summarizing stakeholder questionnaires, developing an analytical innovation state-of-art report and guidelines for thematic group meetings, elaborating innovation policy recommendations.

Page 5: Complex challenges  …

Thematic group (TG) leaders

Themes selected for analysis and exchange of experience • 1. Innovative financial instruments (Birmingham)• 2. Public procurement and innovation (Lazio Regione)• 3. Publicly owned enterprises and innovation (Sabadell)• 4. Civil society inclusion in public innovation (Aberdeen)

Horizontal theme: • 5. Local /regional blind-spots – generalize all critical problems born

in the thematic discussions and contribute to the innovation policy recommendations

Page 6: Complex challenges  …

Overview of the result indicators

N° of good practices identified

6N. Analytical Study Visits report

40

N. Deep Delegation reports

Total N° of participants in all these interregional events

Target

13N° of regional/local policies and instruments addressed in the field tackled by the operation

13Number of implementation plans developed (applicable only from fourth call onward)

IndicatorsN° of interregional events (seminars, workshops, study visits, etc.) organised by the project to exchange experience

360

5

EU Innovation Policy Recommendation Report/100 copies/ 1

15

4

N° of staff members with inceased capacity (knowledge/skills/expertise) resulting from the exchange of experience at interregional events

N° of good practices successfully transferred (if applicable)

60

5N° of regional/local policies and instruments improved in the field tackled by the operation

Page 7: Complex challenges  …

Identification of good practices

• Methodology developed by PP14: a guide & a template

• Good practices are identified by ALL partners

• Database prepared by PP6 (on project website?)

• Transfer of 1 good practice to your own region: what would benefit you most? Discuss!

Page 8: Complex challenges  …

In the project application:

Output indicators of the component 2

• Analytical State-of-the-Art Report on local innovation in the public sector

• Good Practice Identification Guide• Best Practice Transferability Guide

What is done in CP2/CP3 - needs to be defined

Page 9: Complex challenges  …

CP3 interregional visits

Focus on the partners’ experience in 5 themes

Thematic group discussions• Study visits

• Deep Delegation visits• ”Sharing expertise and experience to present in depth the best practice

selected for adoption” • ”Partner will receive up to 3 learning partners”

Page 10: Complex challenges  …

CP Visit template provided by the leadpartner

CCIC Project Meetings

Kick off - Sofia

SC1

SC2 - Aberdeen MayTGM1- PP BirmSC3-GavleTGM2 - PP WarsawSC4 - WarsawTGM3- PP SabadellSC5 -GenoaTGM4 -PP TartuSC6 - Tartu

Final Conference- Catania+SC7 SepSC8 -Final -on-line Nov

Deep Delegation Nov Mar April / May July

Study Visits Nov Mar May/June July??? Oct

PMG,kickoff, f inal Sofia Aberdeen Gavle Warsaw Genoa Tartu CataniaStudy visits Birmngham Lazio Region Eindhoven Jyvaskyla?? Sabadell

Deep Delegations External Lazio Region Birmngham/ Sabadell Eindhoven

/Javaskyla

2012 2013 2014

Feb

Sept

Feb

Feb

Sept

Page 11: Complex challenges  …

Regional Innovation Plans

• Regional Innovation Plans for the specific features of innovation ecosystem that partners live in and work for.

• > each partner organises regional workshops

• >” RIPs will contain a clear explanation of the post 2012 intentions of the regional Managing Authorities and their partners in the respect of the CCIC methodologies and good practices imported.”

• > As a result each partner will design a pilot project to adopt another partners’ best practice after the project lifetime

Page 12: Complex challenges  …

Regional Innovation Plans

Policies addressed and improved?

• ”13 regional/local policies addressed in the field tackled by the operation”• Can be considered as a policy area, which each project partner is

addressing together in the project.

• ”5 regional/local policies and instruments improved”• JTS: clear evidence on impact on policy level is needed.

Page 13: Complex challenges  …

Overview of the first activities

Activities Jan – June 2012

P14 prepares & all discuss• Preparation of methodology &

state-of-the-art questionaire of innovation performance

• good practice template • Guidelines for TG meetings

May-June: Interviews by all partners tocollect regional data and goodpractices

Outputs Jan – June 2012

• 1 Methodology, 1 state-of-the-art questionaire, 1 good practice template prepared

• 130 interviews: 10/each partner• 50 good practices mapped• 1 methodology and 5 guidelines for

thematic groups• LP: Recruite 6 Correspondents from

outside partnership: • To collect regional data/GP, prepare

reports, participate in CCIC meetings and one of them to organize deep delegation visit ?

Page 14: Complex challenges  …

Overview of the first activities

Activities July – Dec 2012

July: Interviews to fill in the State-of-the-Art questionaires, GP identification ends

July-Sept: • P14: Analytical State-of-the-Art Report on

Public Sector Innovation• P6: Good Practice database• Country correspondents produce reports on

innovations based on desk research• Discussion on topics above

Sept: Thematic group meeting in Gävle on ”Innovative Financial Instruments”

Partners agree on best practices to be studied

Local meetings with policy decision-makers and stakeholders on State-of-the- Art report

Nov: Study Visit In Birmingham. Study visit report by Birmingham, feedback from the participants

Outputs July – Dec 2012

- 6 reports by correspondents of 6 non-CCIC countries

- 1 Analytical State-of-the-Art Report

- 13 local meetings

- 1 good practice database

- 1 thematic group meeting report on ”Innovative financial instruments” and ”blindspots”

- 13 best practices selected

- 1 Study Visits Program approved

- 1 analytical report on the SV backed up by 7 individual SV reports (???)

Page 15: Complex challenges  …

Jyväskylä’s ExperiencesGood practices…

• Good practices: INTERREG IVC Programme Managing Authority collects good practices from the Lead Partners with standardized system • Minimize double work

• There are no best practices, but many good ones. • Consider practices which could be beneficial for other partners

• Transfer of good practices is challenging: different needs and priorities, different kind of organisations etc…• Local adjustment is needed• JTS on transfers: ”practices that have actually been transferred within

the project. Only a practice introduced by one partner and that has a concrete and measurable impact on another partner”

Page 16: Complex challenges  …

Other thoughts …

• The responsibility to get most out of the project depends on each and every partner.

• Jyväskylä is flying the flag of the importance of the local work. • Flexibility for the local work & activities is needed.• However, don’t forget to share your doings with the network.

• Look for the possibilites for co-working with the partners. Project visits should not be the only channel for exchanging experiences and views.

Page 17: Complex challenges  …

Tip: Help yourself and the LP - keep your external budget lines in mind Project Application p. 54

6

1-13

12

51 400,00

none

14

1-13

none

2

EE in support to:1.TGMs and GPs identification/Eur11000/;2.TMG4 working session /Eur11000/

EE for Innovation policy recommendations development/Eur13000/&BP transferability guide development/Eur5800/

Correspondents for 6 cities/regions from the EU innovation leaders/to collect regional data/GP,prepare reports,participate in CCIC meetings and one of them to organize DD visit. none

none

none

Organization of TGM1 meeting /Eur1500/ and TGM2 meeting /Eur1000//venue,catering,equipment/

1

EE in support to: RIP development /Eur10400/ incl. pilot projects development /Eur41000/

Local meetings with key policy decisionmakers and stakeholders on RIP discussion/venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/

17 000,00

13;9

20 000,00

none

none

none

none

6Organization of 4th Study Visit and 4th Deep Delegation Visit/venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/none

Local meetings with key policy decisionmakers and stakeholders on Analytical State of the Art Report /venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/

Com

ponent 3

1-13

Organization of 3rd Study Visit and 5th Deep Delegation Visit/venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/

22 000,00

18 800,00

30 000,00

52 000,00

7 500,00

15 000,00

3

2 500,00

52 000,00

none 15 000,00

none

none

Organization of 5th Study Visit and 3rd Deep Delegation Visit/venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/7

Org.of 2nd SV and 1st DD Visit /Eur15000/;EE in TGMs and GPs identification support/Eur15000//venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/none

5;8

2 000,00

EEs in:1-enhance innov ideas to businesses Eur24883,07;2-good practices identificationEur13290/

16 000,0011

Organization of TGM3 meeting /Eur1000/ and TGM4 meeting /Eur1000//venue,catering,equipment/10;8

38 173,07

Organization of 1st Study Visit and 2nd Deep Delegation Visit/venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/

none

Organization of 6th Study Visit in non-partners’ organisation/venue,translation,catering,equipment,etc/

Page 18: Complex challenges  …

Your thoughts and ideas?

Page 19: Complex challenges  …

Let’s kick-off!