complex organic chemistry in interstellar ices
TRANSCRIPT
Complex Organic Chemistry in Interstellar Ices
Susanna L. Widicus WeaverDepartment of Chemistry
Emory University
Detected Interstellar Molecules
2 atoms 3 atoms 4 atoms 5 atoms 6 atoms 7 atoms 8 atoms 9 atoms 10 atoms 11 atoms 12 atoms 13 atomsH2 C3 c-C3H C5 C5H C6H CH3C3N CH3C4H CH3C5N HC9N C6H6 HC11N
AlF C2H l-C3H C4H l-H2C4 CH2CHCN HC(O)OCH3 CH3CH2CN (CH3)2CO CH3C6H C2H5OCH3
AlCl C2O C3N C4Si C2H4 CH3C2H CH3COOH (CH3)2O (CH2OH)2
C2 C2S C3O l-C3H2 CH3CN HC5N C7H CH3CH2OH CH3CH2CHO
CH CH2 C3S c-C3H2 CH3NC CH3CHO H2C6 HC7N
CH+ HCN C2H2 H2CCN CH3OH CH3NH2 CH2OHCHO C8H
CN HCO NH3 CH4 CH3SH c-C2H4O l-HC6H CH3C(O)NH2
CO HCO+ HCCN HC3N HC3NH+ H2CCHOH CH2CHCHO C8H–
CO+ HCS+ HCNH+ HC2NC HC2CHO C6H– CH2CCHCN C3H6
CP HOC+ HNCO HCOOH NH2CHO
SiC H2O HNCS H2CNH C5N
HCl H2S HOCO+ H2C2O l-HC4H
KCl HNC H2CO H2NCN l-HC4N
NH HNO H2CN HNC3 c-H2C3O
NO MgCN H2CS SiH4 H2CCNH
NS MgNC H3O+ H2COH+
NaCl N2H+ c-SiC3 C4H–
OH N2O CH3
PN NaCN
SO OCS
SO+ SO2
SiN c-SiC2
SiO CO2
SiS NH2
CS H3+
HF H2D+, HD2+
SH SiCN
HD AlNC
FeO SiNC
O2 HCP
CF+
SiH
PO
Schematic of a Hot Core
UV
Hot Core
complex organics
T (gas) = 200 - 1000 K
~1016 cm
T (dust) ~90 K ~60 K ~45 K ~20 K
SiO
H2O, CH3OH, NH3
H2S
CH3CN
~5x1017 cm
H2O ice
CO2CON2O2ice
CO2ice
trappedCO
CH3OHice
CSO Orion Spectrum
5365 lines observed
79% of the lines are unassigned!
Blake et al. ApJ, 1986: RMS = 150 mK, integration time ~ 27 nightsOur survey: RMS = 20 mK, time ~ 4 nights
See poster by Radhuber et al. for more information!
THz Observational Astronomy
480 GHz -1.2 THz
1.4 – 1.9 THz
Herschel Observatory
Launched on May 14, 2009!
Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared AstronomyFlight tests began in 2007
Initial science observations begin in 2010500 GHz – 2.1 THz
Atacama Large Millimeter Array First antennas arrived in 2007
Scheduled for completion in 2012
80 GHz – 950 GHz64 antennas
The Murchison Meteorite
• amino acids
• sugars and polyols
• other organics
Organic Material in Meteorites
http://www.hermann-beer-ka.de/nucleosynthesis/abund/Murchison.jpg
Key Questions:
How far can chemistry go in the ISM??
Is a parent body required??
Possible Molecular Formation Schemes
vs.
Grain Surface Reactions
Charnley, S. (2001) Interstellar Organic Chemistry. In: The Proceedings of the Workshop The Bridge Between the Big Bang and Biology, (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Italy).
Gas Phase Reactions
C
O
N
HH
H
HH
C
C
N
HH
HH
OO
H
C
O
N
HH
H
HH
H
aminomethanol glycine protonatedaminomethanol
HCOOH
or H3+
CH3OH2+ +
-H3O+
• Cannot form by ion-molecule reactions Horn et al. 2004, ApJ 611, 605
• Grain surface formation?Structural isomers would have similar abundances!
• Complex molecules observed in regions of grain mantle disruption:
Shocked regions in the GC (Martin-Pintado et al.)
Hot Corinos (Ceccarelli, Caselli, et al.)
The Methyl Formate Problem
Acetic AcidMethyl Formate Glycolaldehyde
52 2 1
C
O
OCH3
H
C
O
OHCH3C
OCOH
H
H H
Bottinelli et al. ApJL 617, 2004
Grain Surface Formation
hν
H2O, CO, CH3OH, NH3 , H2COIce mantle
H2O + hν OH + HH2 + O
CH3OH + hν CH3 + OHCH3O + HCH2OH + H
NH3 + hν NH2 + H
H2CO + hν HCO + H
HCO + CH3O CH3OCHO (methyl formate)
HCO + CH2OH HOCH2CHO (glycolaldehyde)
HCO
CH3O
HCOOCH3
Garrod, Widicus Weaver, & Herbst, ApJ 682, 2008
Two-Stage Hot Core Model
1. Cloud Collapse (isothermal free-fall)
2. Warm-up (second-order power law)
nH = 3x103 cm-3 nH = 1x107 cm-3
106 years
5x104 years
(high mass)
10 K 200 K
time
New Model
Previous Models
Tem
pera
ture
Garrod, Widicus Weaver, & Herbst, ApJ 682, 2008
-12-11-10
-9-8-7-6-5-4-3
glyco
lalde
hyde
aceti
c acid
formic
acid
formald
ehyd
e
ethyle
ne gl
ycol
ethan
ol
methyl
formate
dimeth
yl eth
er
formam
ide
aceta
ldehy
de
methan
ol
methyla
mine
log(
n/n H
)
Sgr B2(N-LMH) (Observed)
Model
Initial Results: Ice Composition
Garrod, Widicus Weaver, & Herbst, ApJ 682, 2008
Lingering Questions
1. Methanol photolysis branching ratios?Quantitative lab measurements.
2. ID of key intermediates to trace chemistry?Laboratory studies to support observational search.
3. Varying physical and chemical parameters for interstellar clouds?Spectral line surveys of many sources.
4. Spectral interference from “interstellar weeds?”Complete laboratory spectral cataloging.
Motivation: Understanding COMs in the ISMGrain surface formation
• Simple molecules form in ice via single-atom addition reactions
• Organic radicals form in ice via photolysis of simple molecules
• Radicals react during warm-up to form larger organics
Gas phase formation• Molecules are released from ices
• Gas-phase molecules are ionized
• Ion-molecule reactions drivegas-phase organic chemistry
hν
H2O, CO, CH3OH, NH3 , H2COIce mantle
C
O
N
HH
H
HH
C
C
N
HH
HH
OO
H
C
O
N
HH
H
HH
H
aminomethanol
glycine
protonatedaminomethanol
HCOOH
or H3+
CH3OH2+ +
-H2O
Transient molecules are the driving forces for both grain-surface and gas-phase chemistry.
Detected Interstellar Molecules
2 atoms 3 atoms 4 atoms 5 atoms 6 atoms 7 atoms 8 atoms 9 atoms 10 atoms 11 atoms 12 atoms 13 atomsH2 C3 c-C3H C5 C5H C6H CH3C3N CH3C4H CH3C5N HC9N C6H6 HC11N
AlF C2H l-C3H C4H l-H2C4 CH2CHCN HC(O)OCH3 CH3CH2CN (CH3)2CO CH3C6H C2H5OCH3
AlCl C2O C3N C4Si C2H4 CH3C2H CH3COOH (CH3)2O (CH2OH)2
C2 C2S C3O l-C3H2 CH3CN HC5N C7H CH3CH2OH CH3CH2CHO
CH CH2 C3S c-C3H2 CH3NC CH3CHO H2C6 HC7N
CH+ HCN C2H2 H2CCN CH3OH CH3NH2 CH2OHCHO C8H
CN HCO NH3 CH4 CH3SH c-C2H4O l-HC6H CH3C(O)NH2
CO HCO+ HCCN HC3N HC3NH+ H2CCHOH CH2CHCHO C8H–
CO+ HCS+ HCNH+ HC2NC HC2CHO C6H– CH2CCHCN C3H6
CP HOC+ HNCO HCOOH NH2CHO
SiC H2O HNCS H2CNH C5N
HCl H2S HOCO+ H2C2O l-HC4H
KCl HNC H2CO H2NCN l-HC4N
NH HNO H2CN HNC3 c-H2C3O
NO MgCN H2CS SiH4 H2CCNH
NS MgNC H3O+ H2COH+
NaCl N2H+ c-SiC3 C4H–
OH N2O CH3
PN NaCN
SO OCS
SO+ SO2
SiN c-SiC2
SiO CO2
SiS NH2
CS H3+
HF H2D+, HD2+
SH SiCN
HD AlNC
FeO SiNC
O2 HCP
CF+
SiH
PO
Radicals and Ions
Production Methods
Discharges
Photolysis
• Small quantities (low efficiency)
• High temperatures = weak signals
• Interference from stable molecules
• Reactivity/instability of products
Matrix Isolation
hν
Supersonic Expansions
THzFTMW CRDS
1 cm 10 µm 1 µm 100 nm1 mm 100 µm
30 GHz1 cm-1
30 THz1000 cm-1
300 THz10,000 cm-1
3000 THz100,000 cm-1
300 GHz10 cm-1
3 THz100 cm-1
10 cm
3 GHz0.1 cm-1
The ‘THz Gap’
1 – 50 GHzFrequencySynthesizer
VDI Multiplier chain50 GHz – 1.2 THz Detector
Gas Flow Cell
To Computer
Sample Input To Vacuum Pump
Laboratory Spectral Cataloging
Methanol
First light April 1, 2009!
Ethyl Cyanide
CRDS High Finesse Cavity
Mode MatchingOptics
SupersonicSource
DetectorRadiationSource
IR mirrors → dielectric coatedLosses due to transmission
THz mirrors → metal coatedLosses due to skin depth
R ~99.99%
cavity ringdownrecorded
FTMW High Finesse Cavity
Detector
Switch
SupersonicSource
RadiationSource
Aperture: r << λ
X
microwave mirrors → apertureLarge λ, small losses
THz mirrors → ?Small λ, large losses with any aperture!
R ≈ 98%
free-induction decay recorded
Proposed THz-CRDS Spectrometer
Wire GridPolarizers
1 – 50 GHzFrequencySynthesizer
VDI multiplier chain50 GHz – 1.2 THz
Mode MatchingOptics
Off-Axis Parabolic Mirror
HEB Detector
To Computer
SupersonicSource
Transmission = 10-4
≤700 GHzR = 99.99%
Progress Toward THz-CRDSBeam profiling completed, mode-matching optimized
Polarizer reflectivity tested up to 300 GHz
R = 99.9 – 99.99%
Cavity Modes at 180 GHz!
Cavity length = 33 cmMode FWHM = 1.7 MHzPolarizer R =0.988Cavity FSR = 445.5 MHz
Need longer cavity, higher R for CRDS!
Next Steps in THz-CRDS Development
• Narrow cavity modes, increase pathlength
• Incorporate translation stage; trigger ringdown events
• Extend system to higher frequencies
• Incorporate cavity into vacuum chamber
• Test fully-integrated system on known molecules
• Begin molecular spectroscopy on ions, reactive organic intermediates
• Extend to broadband spectral acquisition
Grain Surface Formation
hν
H2O, CO, CH3OH, NH3 , H2COIce mantle
H2O + hν OH + HH2 + O
CH3OH + hν CH3 + OHCH3O + HCH2OH + H
NH3 + hν NH2 + H
H2CO + hν HCO + H
HCO + CH3O CH3OCHO (methyl formate)
HCO + CH2OH HOCH2CHO (glycolaldehyde)
Garrod, Widicus Weaver, & Herbst, ApJ 682, 2008
••
••
•• •
Ener
gy (k
cal/m
ol) •
Methanol Dissociation
Chang and Lin 2004, Chem. Phys. Lett., 384, 229
THz Spectroscopy as a Probe
Mass Spec alone cannot distinguish products
THz spectroscopy can!
See poster by Laas et al. for more information!
Astrochemical Modeling• A series of methanol photolysis branching ratios were used, and peak
abundances were compared to Sgr B2(N) abundances
• Ice photolysis branching ratios of CH3:CH2OH:CH3O = 18:1:1 give the best match to Sgr observations
• Longer warm-up timescales give better agreement with observed abundances of more complex organic species.
CO
O
H H
HH
O C
HH
HCH H
O
H
C
O
N
HH
H
HH
OC
HH
H
OH
NHH
CH H
OH
CH H
OH
CH H
OH
.
methoxymethanol
methanediol
aminomethanol
.
+
+
+.
.
.
.
Prebiotic
Molecule Formation
O(1D) Insertion
Reactions
C
H
N
HH
HH
CO
O
H H
HH
O C
HH
HCH H
O
H
COH
HH
H
O C
HH
HCH H
H
C
O
N
HH
H
HH
O(1D)
O(1D)
O(1D)
dimethyl ether methoxymethanol
methanol methanediol
methylamine aminomethanol
hν
Photolysis Fast-Mixing Nozzle
quartz capillary
CH3OH
N2O + Ar
O(1D)
O(1D) + CH3OH → HOCH2OH
HOCH2OH
+ Ar
Interaction region
Kinetics StudiesSee poster by Anderson et al. for more information!
Initial Photlysis Results: N2O
N2O photolysis monitored by rotational line signal depletion
Photolysis Fast-Mixing
Sourcehν
mm/submm
12% reduction in N2O signal observed
Using THz Spectroscopy to Trace Prebiotic Chemistry in Space
What do we plan to measure?• Photolysis branching ratios for complex organics• Spectra of small, reactive organics produced via O(1D) insertion• Spectra of molecular ions with complex internal motion• THz spectral catalogs of “interstellar weeds”
AcknowledgementsThe Widicus Weaver Group:Mary Radhuber, Jake Laas, Brandon Carroll, Brett McGuire, Thomas AndersonJay Kroll, Patrick Lanter
Eric Herbst, OSURobin Garrod, CornellGeoffrey Blake, CaltechThom Orlando, GA TechCSO/Caltech: Matthew Sumner, Frank Rice, Jonas Zmuidzinas, & Tom Phillips
Virginia Diodes, Inc. QMC Instruments, Ltd.