component completion report
TRANSCRIPT
Earthquake and Tsunami Emergency Support Project
Fisheries Component
NAD & Nias
Indonesia
Component Completion Report
August 2009
Submitted by
NETWORK OF AQUACULTURE CENTRES IN ASIA-PACIFIC (NACA)
BANGKOK, THAILAND
C O N T E N T S
Page I. Component Information 1
A. Data (to be completed by EMS) 1 B. Component Objectives 1
1. Description 1 2. Goal 2 3. Component Purpose 2 4. Subcomponents 2
C. Implementation Arrangements 3 D. Outputs/Achievements 6
1. Financial Performance 8 2. Outputs 9
II. Component Rating 16 A. Component Factors 16 B. Ratings 22 C. Impact 22
1. Institutional 22 2. Socio-economic 23 3. Socio-economic Survey 2008 & Financial and Economic Analysis of SC1,
SC2, SC3 & SC4 24 4. Technological 25 5. Environmental 25
III. Issues 27 IV. Lessons Learnt 27
Assessment, design and planning 27 Implementation procedures 28 Finance and financial management 29 Communications 29 Monitoring, supervision and reporting 30 Policy and institutions 30 ETESP-Fisheries Subcomponents 31
SC1 Community Empowerment 31 SC2 Capture Fisheries 32 SC3 Aquaculture 33 SC4 Infrastructure 34 SC5 Coastal Environment 35 SC6 Institutional Support 36
Community livelihood support initiatives 37 Aquaculture - ALSC & AACC 37 Capture Fisheries – CF-LSC 38 Community based bathymetric mapping (“sonar mapping”) 41
V. Recommendations 42 A. General 42 B. Follow-up Actions 42
ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report
ii
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank
ADR Activity Design Report
BER Bid Evaluation Report
BOQ Bill of Quantities
DCN District Concept Note
DIPA Budget allocation document of GOI
DIU District Implementation Unit
DKP Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan (provincial /district fisheries departments)
EMS Extended Mission to Sumatra (ADB)
ETESP Earthquake and Tsunami Emergency Support Project
FD Community facilitator
GoI Government of Indonesia
IEE Initial Environmental Examination
IOC Incremental Operational Costs
KPPN Kantor Pelayanan Perbendaharaan Negara (Local Provincial Treasury)
LMS ETESP Livelihood Microfinance Services Component
MDF Multi Donor Fund
MAK Mata Anggaran Kegiatan (Government Budgeting Guidelines)
MMAF Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries
MOF Ministry of Finance
NAD Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam
NGO nongovernment organization
PIU Project Implementation Unit (District)
PMO Project Management Office (of EMS in Medan & Banda Aceh - ADB)
PMU Project Management Unit (Banda Aceh)
PNM Pemodalan Nasional Madani
PPK Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen (within Satker BRR)
ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report
iii
RAND BRR Recovery Aceh Nias Database (of ongoing and planned rehabilitation projects)
RKAKL Budget plan of GoI
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
(average for period 18 March 2008 – 30 June 2009 www.oanda.com)
Currency Unit - Rp. (Indonesian Rupiah)
Rp1.00 = $0.00011
$1.00 = Rp 10,308
NOTES
In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.
The fiscal year (FY) of the Government and its agencies ends on 31 December.
ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report
iv
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Fisheries Component of ETESP (ETESP-Fisheries) has supported rehabilitation and restoration of the fisheries sector and coastal natural resources in Aceh and Nias. ETESP-Fisheries had six subcomponents: (i) community empowerment; (ii) small-scale capture fisheries; (iii) small-scale aquaculture; (iv) small-scale fish landings and post harvest facilities; (v) coastal resources rehabilitation; and (v) support fisheries services restoration.
It supported the rehabilitation of livelihoods of tsunami and earthquake affected people in eleven districts and towns in Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (NAD) and North Sumatra: Aceh Besar; Aceh Utara; Pidie; Nias; Nias Selatan; Banda Aceh; Bireuen; Lhokseumawe; Aceh Jaya; Aceh Barat; and Simeulue.
In addition to the 6 sub-components which principally dealt with restoration and rehabilitation, the ETESP Fisheries developed innovative capacity building and training sub-projects aimed at improving small-scale producer livelihoods in coastal aquaculture and capture fisheries. These subprojects were development of the Aceh Aquaculture Communication Centre and Aquaculture Livelihoods Service Centres, Capture Fisheries Livelihoods Service Centres, and Community Based Bathymetric Survey (Sonar Mapping).
The overall goal of the ETESP has been to help rebuild the affected regions and support their economic revival to meet the Millennium Development Goals. Its purpose has been to (i) facilitate economic revival in the affected regions by restoring livelihoods; and (ii) alleviate constraints due to the lack of adequate public goods and facilities by restoring essential public services and rebuilding infrastructure.
The ETESP Fisheries Component had an overall allocated budget of US$30 million. The consultants and implementing agencies mobilised in September 2005 and the component closed in June 2009.
BRR designated the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF) as the Implementing Agency (IA) of ETESP-Fisheries. A MMAF Project Management Unit (PMU) was established by MMAF in December 2005 in Banda Aceh, with responsibility for coordination and management of ETESP-Fisheries of the 2005 budget, extended till December 2006 (2006L).
In 2006, BRR was designated as the Implementing Agency (IA) of ETESP-Fisheries for the 2006 budget and remained as IA until the end of the Fisheries component in 2009. During the course of component implementation there were a total of 5 Project Management Units (Satkers), each one corresponding to a GOI annual budget (DIPA).
For 2 years there was wide scale input by a separately contracted Indonesian NGO, Bina Swadaya to facilitate the social empowerment aspect of Fisheries, Agriculture and Irrigation components. In Fisheries their main activities were associated with “socialising” village grants (SC1) and community contracts for tambaks and agroinputs (SC3) The Community Mobilisation Specialists (CMF) and Community Facilitators (CF) were based at village level.
The ETESP Fisheries component exceeded considerably the original targets set out in the objectives of the component logframe. These targets, outputs and achievements of ETESP Fisheries are summarised clearly in the following table:
ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report
v
ON BUDGET – ETESP FISHERIES
Activities under SubComponent Outputs Comments
Subcomponent 1: Community empowerment
1.1 Community contracts o 243 contracts issued/completed under SC1
o 17,862 beneficiaries
o Grants delivered through community contracts – contracts completed ~ 16% of ETESP overall budget
o Producer groups get experience in working with contracts
o Wide range of livelihoods restarted o Hygiene and industry licencing
obtained by producer groups 1.2 Funds disbursed o Rp.45,618,757,481 o Total amount on budget through
DIPA 2006 -2007-2008 1.3 Fishers/farmers trained o 17,862 beneficiaries o Relevant technical training
associated with community contracts
Subcomponent 2: Restoration of capture fisheries
2.1 Boats & fishing gear o 141 boats o 5GT – 87 o 10GT – 18 o 15GT – 22 o 20GT – 14
o >300 small boats
o Larger boats tendered & contracted o Some smaller boats under
community contracts on Nias & Simeulue
o Fishers consulted during design stage
o Participatory monitoring by beneficiary fishers during construction
2.2 o 141 sets of fishing gear o To accompany boats
o 600 fishing lights o Floating & submersible lamps o 1200 beneficiaries o Total cost Rp.656,560,000
2.3 Fishers trained o 1,599 trainees o Training in gear, boat design, GPS, fish finders, radio, etc.
Subcomponent 3: Restoration of aquaculture facilities
No Output Targets and Indicators Progress/achievements
ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT OBJECTIVES
Agricultural and fisheries production in the affected areas restored
o Fishponds on 3,000 ha are restored to pre-tsunami levels by end 2007
o 3,178 ha restored before June 2009 o ETESP Fisheries ponds rehabilitation
directly benefitted 4,793 small scale aquaculture farmers and their families in Aceh and Nias before June 2009
o Other beneficiaries from aquaculture livelihoods activities total >6,235
o Many more will benefit from AACC/ALSC network
o Further beneficiaries from trading and marketing
o 13,000 small scale fishers resume fishing by end 2007
o ETESP Fisheries benefitted an estimated 18,000 small scale fishers and families in Aceh and Nias by June 2009
ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report
vi
3.1 Shrimp/milkfish ponds restored/ operational
o 3,178ha ponds restored o 4,793 beneficiaries o 6 Districts benefitted
o Note the successful use of community contracts ~500 community contracts issued by SC3
3.2 Agroinputs provided o Value Rp24,144,071,420o Sufficient to startup
2,462ha
o Note the successful use of community contracts
o Similar beneficiaries number to 3.1 3.3 Shrimp Hatcheries o 49 hatcheries rebuilt &
operational o 49 primary beneficiaries o >3,500 secondary.
beneficiaries (farmers, traders)
o Assistance offered to 52 hatcheries o Note the successful use of
community contracts – success 49 out of 52 (>94%) investments.
3.4 Cage culture units o Grouper – 47 Units o Grouper nurseries – 27
units o Crabs – 31 units o Tilapia – 4 units o Lobster – 4 units o Total 2,540 beneficiaries
o Alternate aquaculture livelihoods o Note the successful use of
community contracts
3.5 Grouper Hatcheries o BBIP, Fino, Nias o BBIP, Simeulue
o Non-operational pre-tsunami/earthquakes
o Rebuilt, equipped and improved o New local staff appointed by DKP o 16 DKP staff trained by ETESP
Consultants in 2 BBIP o Both hatcheries now active and
spawning grouper 3.6 Seaweed farming o Production units set up
o Nias – 3 units o Nisel – 6 units
o Beneficiaries - 145 o Farmers trained
o Prospective seaweed farmers (men and women) encouraged to form cooperating groups which were trained by NACA and national consultants in farming techniques, processing and marketing. Bulk harvesting and marketing required to overcome relatively low value/volume ratio of product and to achieve quantities which are feasible for buyers to transport with adequate economies of scale from remote locations.”
o “Trials carried out in coordination with COREMAP show that the southern islands of the Nias group (P.Telo, Hibala, etc) have the best water quality conditions for seaweed; trials elsewhere in Nias were less successful”.
o “Seaweed produced was marketed in trial quantities to Jakarta buyers and to COREMAP for replication as seed stock
3.7 Fish farmer training o 5,455 beneficiaries o 9 districts, 2
municipalities
o The tilapia, grouper, seaweed, pond farmer construction have been fully supported with practical on site training.
ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report
vii
o Simeulue grouper farmers have marketed their products.
o Nias and Nias Selatan seaweed farming supported by ADB ETESP Fisheries have revealed positive influence in regions. Some villages/investors/other donors (Coremap) have replicated seaweed farming in Nias Selatan.
o Hatchery operators have financed and started their own fish hatcheries independently after receiving fish hatchery training.
o Farmers’ skills in better management practices improved.
3.8 Manuals, brochures, posters
o 35 publications o ~25,000 beneficiaries
o Coordination between donors and GoI to produce BMP and distribute manuals, posters
o Village by village BMP video film shows
3.9 Publicity o Website o Newspapers – national
and international o Video
o www.acehfisheries.org o BMP for aquaculture video joint
production by ADB/NACA/FAO/IFC/WWF.
Subcomponent 4: Restoration of small-scale fisheries post-harvest facilities
4.1 Fish landings/ jetties o 19 rebuilt o 8,523 beneficiaries
o Major policy shift required on ownership and management from “state/local government asset” to producer group.
o Where possible co-management advice and training given
o ETESP unable to tackle estuarine access and perennial dredging problem
4.2 Fish markets o 4 rebuilt o 4,000 beneficiaries
o Major policy shift required on ownership and management from “state/local government asset” to market user group.
o Where possible co-management advice and training given by consultants
4.3 Packing sheds o 1 rebuilt o 100 beneficiaries
o * ditto *
4.4 Deep wells o 2 rebuilt o 600 beneficiaries
o * ditto *
4.5 Marine fuel depots o 11 rebuilt o 5,500 beneficiaries
o * ditto * o General public also benefit from
local availability of kerosene, petrol, lubricants
4.6 Ice plants o 4 ice plants built o 4 ice plants built: Aceh Utara, Aceh Jaya, Simeulue, Nias and Nias Selatan”
o “Economies of scale apply and early survey showed that ice plants of less than 10 tonnes/day output and sales are unlikely to be self-sustaining”.
o ‘Nias ice plants were originally designed to be mobile/transportable as it was expected that they would
ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report
viii
be moved from their original sites in Gunung Sitoli and Teluk Dalam, to Tehemburua and Lahusa respectively, when ice factories which BRR was planning were built. This did not transpire”.
o “After further intervention by consultants at request of BRR and ADB, the two Nias ice plants were rendered fully functional and handed over to public-private (kerjasama) arrangements by July 2009.
o Major policy shift encouraged on ownership and management from “state/local government asset” to producer group/private sector.
o Where possible co-management advice and training is given by consultants
Subcomponent 5: Coastal ecosystem restoration
5.1 Trees planted o 1,274,952 o Mangroves principally replanted to “green” rehabilitated tambaks
o Casuarina, Coconut trees planted on West Coast to enhance dune/swale coastal environment
5.2 Farmer training o 5,000 beneficiaries o Shrimp farmers and villagers now more aware of better management practices and eco friendly production
5.3 Schools awareness campaigns
o 3 campaigns o 500 beneficiaries
o Childrens’ environmental knowledge improved. Teachers provided with materials for subsequent improvement of curricula
5.4 Posters/brochures/manuals o 10 publications o 5,000 beneficiaries
o Range of environmental posters/brochures/manuals produced
Subcomponent 6: Fisheries support services
6.1 DKP offices rebuilt o Locations: Nias, Nias Selatan, Banda Aceh, Lhokseumawe
o Furniture & equipment provided
o Offices rebuilt after tsunami o Total cost Rp. 1,594,121,900 o Approx. no. GoI staff in offices
(estimate) • 1 district = 50 staff • 4 district= 200 staff
6.2 DKP vehicles provided o 11 Districts – 1 vehicle each
o DKP Districts supplied with vehicles and motorcycles in order to effectively service ETESP fieldwork
6.3 DKP equipment provided o 11 Districts – 4 motorcycles each
o Motorcycles to DKP NAD & Panglima Laot
o DKP Districts provided computers, printers, water test kits, etc. to effectively service ETESP work
o Training given where needed 6.4 DKP experience through
involvement in Satker and DIU
o 11 DKP District affected o Local DKP gains experience in implementing international grant programme
o Local DKP gains knowledge through association with innovative approaches eg. Sonar Mapping, LSC-CF, AACC, ALSC
ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report
ix
o DKP local staff boosted at BBIP Nias/Simeulue and trained
o Innovative producer group services begin to replace non-functional top-down fisheries extension system
o Training/TOR/guidelines provided 6.5 Assets handover to
Ladong MMAF Training Centre
o Furniture, computers, printers, etc
o Received donation of ETESP fisheries assets at end of project
o Actually this style of training centre had very limited capacity and provided little input for the participatory, community focussed ETESP Fisheries component.
OFF BUDGET - ETESP FISHERIES - INNOVATIVE LIVELIHOODS DEVELOPMENT
7.1 Community marine mapping and livelihoods improved
(CBBS – Sonar Mapping)
o Website formed www.panglima.net
o 350 new marine charts delivered
o Fish identification booklet delivered
o PL staff trained in use of sonar equipment, GPS, computers, mapping, radio communications
o 90 GPS/fishfinder units distributed and returning information
o 10 university student projects ongoing
o 175 captains trained in GPS/navigation
o Total beneficiaries 2,835+
o Video “Mapping the Sea, Improving Livelihoods”
o Presidential visit presentation
o Fishers shared knowledge and skills restored and enhanced
o Traditional fishers organization Panglima Laot engages in resource survey, research and management
o Traditional fishers organization Panglima Laot evolving into a business association attractive to investment
o Fishers collect, own, understand and use data about resources and market prices
o Linkages between fishers, PL, DKP, Marine Police, University, AGDC
o Participatory research ongoing o Scientific data as basis for co-
management of natural resources in hands of fishers
o Inputs to CFAN4 exposition o President visit to Aceh 03 Feb 2009 o ADB VIP visits o Video publicised on ADB YouTube
site 7.2 Aquaculture Livelihoods
• Aceh Aquaculture Communications Centre
• Aquaculture Livelihoods Service Centres
o 4 Aquaculture Livelihoods Service Centres set up with producer groups in Bireuen and Aceh Utara.
o 1 Aceh Aquaculture Communications Centre set up at MMAF BBAP to provide technical services to ALSC’s
o Website established
o Basis for participative fish farmer producer associations set up with opportunities for investment and clustering.
o Linkages for continuity with FAO-ARC Aquaculture, also WWF and IFC.
o Promotion of Best Management Practices (BMP)
o Interactive information services established in network
o Technical services provided basis of extension service
o ADB VIP visits 7.3 Fisheries Livelihoods
• Capture Fisheries – Livelihoods Service Centres
o Panglima Laot assisted to form network of 8 Livelihoods Service Centres for fishers
o 2 radio communications centres built
o 24 training courses to 680 future LSC based
o Safety at sea improved o Fishers technical skills improved o Fishers understanding of business
and markets improved o Basis for participative fisher
producer associations set up with opportunities for investment and clustering.
ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report
x
trainers given o PL newsletter circulated
to 8,000 fishers/traders
o Communication and safety at sea improved
7.4 Training/Capacity Building o 24 training courses o 4,284 trainees
o Training for fishfarmers and fishers o NACA off-budget provided
innovative training particularly to enhance the livelihoods of beneficiaries of assets from ETESP
o Institutionalised GoI training difficult to provide community level training
7.5 JFPR-OISCA o Advice provided by NACA to reformulation of project
o Systems and information transferred to JFPR-OISCA project
o Unique and innovative systems transferred to JFPR for continuity and ultimately sustainability
o Contributions to JFPR-IHS databaseo Exit transition planning for
livelihoods sub-projects 7.6 ADB ETESP Fisheries Final
Seminar o Closing seminar at
MMAF Jakarta emphasising innovative livelihoods achievements and continuity strategies
o Seminar attended by Head PMO/EMS ADB, DG NACA, MMAF DG Aquaculture, DG Capture Fisheries, OISCA/JFPR, EDFF, Dir.Fisheries BRR, Head DKP NAD.
7.6 ADB PMO/EMS Database o Information/data set provided to PMO/EMS database
o Information/data provided on development of ETESP Fisheries component
o Guidelines, manuals, reports, photos7.7 ADB PMO/EMS
Publicity
o Positive publicity for ADB ETESP
o Numerous instances of low to high profile positive publicity in media.
o Intervention to protect ADB ETESP against advocacy NGO attack
o 4 websites developed and operatingo 3 websites user
interactive/beneficiary owned 7.8 ADB PMO/EMS
Publicity
o Reports as required o Videos
o Servicing PMO/EMS technical, administrative and financial reporting
o Active websites (4) o Inputs to CFAN4 exposition o President visit to Aceh Feb 2009 o ADB VIP visits
1
I. Component Information
A. Data (to be completed by EMS)
Approved Amount On-budget US$’000
Off-budget US$’000
Initial ADB
Variations(scope + implement-ation not contract)
Package 4
Variation 1
Variation 2 etc
Package 40
Variation 1
Variation 2 etc
Final After Variations (if any) ADB
Other Costs (to the extent known) Other 1 (specify)
(eg, beneficiaries, Government) Other 2 etc
Total
Disbursed to completion date
Disbursed/Committed %
Completion Date Original
Revised 31st July 2009
Financial (actual)
or expected
B. Component Objectives
1. Description
1. The Fisheries Component of ETESP (ETESP-Fisheries) has supported rehabilitation and restoration of the fisheries sector and coastal natural resources in Aceh and Nias. ETESP-Fisheries had six subcomponents: (i) community empowerment; (ii) small-scale capture fisheries; (iii) small-scale aquaculture; (iv) small-scale fish landings and post harvest facilities; (v) coastal resources rehabilitation; and (v) support fisheries services restoration. It supported the rehabilitation of livelihoods of tsunami and earthquake affected people in eleven districts and towns in NAD and Northern Sumatra: Aceh Besar; Aceh Utara; Pidie; Nias; Nias Selatan; Banda Aceh; Bireuen; Lhokseumawe; Aceh Jaya; Aceh Barat; and Simeulue.
2
2. Goal
2. The overall goal of the ETESP has been to help rebuild the affected regions and support their economic revival to meet the Millennium Development Goals. Its purpose has been to (i) facilitate economic revival in the affected regions by restoring livelihoods; and (ii) alleviate constraints due to the lack of adequate public goods and facilities by restoring essential public services and rebuilding infrastructure. ETESP Fisheries was included under the Livelihood Restoration, one of five principal sector groupings within ETESP, which is intended to “Rehabilitate the agriculture and fisheries sectors, the mainstay of a majority of the Acehnese, and revive micro and small enterprises”. No goal is mentioned for fisheries.
3. Component Purpose
3. The purpose of ETESP Fisheries, in line with the overall Goal of ETESP, has been “Fisheries production in the affected areas restored in support of livelihoods recovery”1
4. Subcomponents
4. Five subcomponents were provided in the Grant Agreement and modified during the Inception and planning period to the six sub components listed below (Table 2). Objectives were also amended to be specifically tailored to each sub-component.
Table 2: Summary sub components and objective at outcomes
Subcomponent Name Objectives (outcome level)
1. Community empowerment Coastal communities empowered to develop and manage their resources
2. Restoration of capture fisheries Capture fisheries restored to biologically and economically sustainable levels of effort and landings
3. Restoration of aquaculture facilities Aquaculture facilities and production systems restored on a sustainable basis
4. Restoration of small-scale fisheries post-harvest facilities
Small-scale fisheries landing and post-harvest facilities restored
5. Coastal ecosystem restoration Coastal environment rehabilitated and properly managed for sustainable use
6. Fisheries support services Provincial and district/subdistrict fisheries and extension services re-established/strengthened
1 To help rehabilitate the fisheries sector and reestablish livelihoods, the Presidents Report states that ETESP
will provide technical and financial support and production inputs to (i) 12,000 affected small-scale fishers for repairing and restoring their fishing boats, boat engines, and gear; (ii) 2,000 affected small-scale fish farmers for rehabilitation of 3,000 ha of fishponds in seven major aquaculture districts; and (iii) 80 affected coastal communities for rehabilitation of about 12 fish-landing facilities, as well as for community-based applied research activities.
3
C. Implementation Arrangements
5. Planning. Despite heavy pressure to begin disbursement promptly the component went through a prolonged stakeholder consultation process involving assessment and planning during which time the consultants were fully engaged in preparation of concept notes (11), sub-project appraisal reports (SPAR - 4), sub-project preparation reports (SPPR - 11),associated activity development reports (ADR), design documents for tambaks, boats and infrastructure (34) and guidelines. This planning process was the subject of much debate in ADB PMO/EMS and there was initially a varied approach between ETESP components although appointed Executing Agency, BRR exerted very little influence at this stage. The extended consultation process involved in planning ETESP Fisheries laid an important basis for subsequent implementation in an exceedingly complex operating environment.
6. Concept notes were prepared for each district or municipality involved; SPAR were prepared on the basis of East Coast, West Coast, Islands and General; SPPR were District or Kota based; ADR describe activities to be undertaken by sub-component within each SPPR (district or kota).
7. Project Management Units. BRR designated the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF) as the Implementing Agency of ETESP-Fisheries and a MMAF Project Management Unit (PMU) was established by MMAF in December 2005 in Banda Aceh, with responsibility for coordination and management of ETESP-Fisheries of the 2005 budget, extended till December 2006 (2006L). The MMAF PMU consisted of the field implementing unit (Satker – 22 members) in Aceh and a larger Task Force (Satgas – 85 members) in Jakarta.
8. In 2006, BRR was designated as the Implementing Agency of ETESP-Fisheries for the 2006 budget and remained as IA until the end of the Fisheries component in 2009. There were two concurrent project management units in operation during 2006 and during the course of component implementation there have been a total of 5 Project Management Units (Satkers), each one corresponding to a GOI budget (DIPA) and following BRR/GoI policy to change every year.
9. Following recommendations from NACA based on 2006 experiences, management units (PPK) were subsequently established for 4 sub-components, which were maintained throughout 2007 and 2008 (i) Aquaculture (ETESP Fisheries sub-component 3) and environment (Fisheries sub-component 5); Community empowerment (ETESP sub component 1) and institutions and service recovery (ETESP Fisheries sub component-6); (iii) Capture fisheries (ETESP sub-component 2) and infrastructure (ETESP sub-component 4); and (iv) Project implementation on the islands of Nias and Nias Selatan.
10. District Implementing Units (DIU) were established at district fisheries service offices in 11 districts/kotas under the management of the Satkers’, although there were frequent staff changes and office accommodation and facilities were often inadequate. Each DIU comprised of 3 DKP District technical staff and was figuratively headed by the Head of DKP District as coordinator.
11. There was good coordination with other donors IFC, FAO, AusAid, ACIAR, WWF and other NGOs in an informal network for aquaculture development and NACA networking skills were elemental in developing this. A capture fisheries development forum pioneered by FAO and BRR was less successful and eventually dissolved.
4
12. Social facilitation. For 2 years there was wide scale input by a separately contracted Indonesian NGO Bina Swadaya to facilitate the social empowerment aspect of Fisheries, Agriculture and Irrigation components. In Fisheries their main activities were associated with “socialising” village grants (SC1) and community contracts for tambaks and agroinputs (SC3) The Community Mobilisation Specialists (CMF) and Community Facilitators (CF) were based at village level and worked with moderate success although some difficulties in focus and coordination were experienced. In later stages of the ETESP, Bina Swadaya retired and NACA with PMO/EMS approval directly contracted a progressively smaller number of CMS and CF until 31 March 2009.
13. Budgeting. The RKAKL’s and DIPA’s (annual financial plans relating to ETESP Fisheries agreed annual allocations) were prepared by MMAF (DKP) in 2005 and 2006L, and due to the shift of implementing agency, by BRR ETESP Fisheries Satker in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2008L. “L” signifies a committed but underspent budget extended into the next financial year. This clumsy mechanism resulted in a confusion of overlapping budgets to be accounted for and operation of parallel Satkers. NACA consultants assisted with technical budget planning and this represented an opportunity to see that proposed expenditure related to SPPRs and ADRs.
14. Procurement. On-budget procurement, ie. through GoI finance system, was undertaken in three ways by the Project Management Units (PMU) of MMAF and BRR, respectively; by tendering, by direct purchase and through community contracts. A total of 734 community contracts were issued. Tendering committees were established by the Satker during each budget year, working to KEPPRES 80 and ADB procedures. Generally, the former prevailed. Direct purchase was undertaken by the Satker. Community contracts were provided to community groups for a wide range of restoration and rehabilitation activities. The last two mechanisms were used for both on and off-budget funds. All processes were seriously over-bureaucratised at the interface of 2 systems – GoI and ADB. This excessive bureaucracy was a real hindrance to the implementation of community contracts. There was off-budget procurement of design services, trainers, equipment and smaller items by the NACA consultants following ADB procedures.
15. Significant issues remained unresolved between ADB and MMAF at the end of ETESP regarding excessive IOCs charged by the MMAF Satkers and failure to follow the recommended procedures (see also para.29). There were also non-compliance with ADB and GoI procedures regarding tendering and contracting by Satkers and protracted failure by Satkers to provide the meticulous documentation required by ADB. The ADB ETESP NACA consultants working together with the BRR ETESP PMO tried to facilitate the presentation of the correct documentation with some success though it was a long process with little cooperation from past Satker tender committees who were originally paid from ETESP funds to undertake these responsibilities. These “ineligible contracts” are listed in Appendix 13a-d.
16. Supervision. Supervisors have been appointed by the Satkers for supervision of aquaculture, boat construction and fisheries infrastructure subprojects, however actual timely deployment of suitably qualified supervisory staff has been an ongoing problem throughout ETESP Fisheries implementation. Terms of reference were developed and consultants provided initial training to the supervisors prior to mobilization. It is observed that in a large number of cases, the supervisors did not have the appropriate competence to identify problem issues with the constructions (i.e. following the design specifications) and were
5
absent from sites. ETESP consultants have reported these discrepancies to BRR Satker in the follow up to regular monitoring visits.
17. Monitoring. Monitoring was conducted by both the Satker and the BRR Monitoring and Evaluation unit and supplemented by ETESP Fisheries consultants monitoring through off-budget resources. Fisheries consultants particularly monitored technical, social and environmental impacts. The ADB ETESP NACA consultants working together with the BRR ETESP PMO and the BRR Director of Fisheries also monitored financial disbursement progress and assisted the ADB PMO/EMS to compare this with their data inputs from the KPPN
18. Implementation. Implementation was supported by a comprehensive set of implementation guidelines and training provided by NACA for each of the different sub-components. These guidelines were reviewed with each of the changing Satkers and modified based on experiences. Little government institutional memory was generated throughout the life of the ETESP Fisheries due to the frequent changes. A key function of the consultants therefore was to maintain the institutional memory. Off-budget implementation activities were supported by consultants through sub-contracts to NGO’s, government institutions and Universities, private firms, individual experts and communities.
19. Primarily important amongst NGOs was the Bina Swadaya group which assisted the Fisheries Site Advisers throughout the entire socialisation and community contract process. Their final report states: In relation to livelihood restoration and coastal resource management, between June 2007 and June 2008 facilitation was carried out for preparation of Definitive Plans for the Group Needs (RDKK) – otherwise Community Contracts planning - and the Fund Utilization Plan (RPD). Reporting for implementation of Community Contracts in fisheries component by 1,051 groups were facilitated together with Site Advisors from Fisheries Consultants. Total grant distributed through Community Contracts totalled Rp 78,985,866,919 ($8 million). The number of SHG members involved in community facilitation and training from agriculture, fisheries and irrigation components, totalled 106,698, consisting of 64,742 men and 41,956 women
20. Environmental aspects. Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) documents were completed and are appended to each of the approved SPARs and SPPRs and IEE documents were prepared for each SPPR. All approved REA and IEE documents have been translated into Bahasa Indonesia by the consultant team and widely circulated to concerned stakeholders. There was regular contact with BAPEDALDA (GoI environmental agency) NAD and Sumut in the approval process.
21. Environmental monitoring training was organized during December 2006 for each designated DIU staff, following which the environmental monitoring manual was finalized and support continued to be provided to the BRR Satker and DIU in organization of the environmental monitoring systems, according to the IEE documents.
22. Boat building contracts had inbuilt FAKO (timber licencing/source declaration) requirements to comply with anti-logging edicts issued by the government.
23. School coastal environmental awareness campaigns including tree planting were organized and offer an educational approach which will have benefits in years to come.
6
24. A total of 16 Initial Environmental Evaluation (IEE) documents guided monitoring throughout the project. International and national coastal environmental specialists were part of the NACA consultant team throughout.
25. Consultants (NACA) with international expertise assisted the PMO/EMS to successfully respond to challenges from environmental advocacy groups (NGO). Environmental management procedures adopted in aquaculture followed international recognized norms modified through stakeholder consultation in Aceh to adapt to the local circumstances. All environmental appraisal was conducted with the agreement of the GoI department BAPEDALDA.
26. Social aspects. Initial Poverty and Social Assessment (IPSA) documents were prepared as part of each of the four SPARs. No Community Action Plans (CAP) or Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) were prepared as to date no land acquisition issues or activities were reported. Special attention was given to the land status in preparation of each SPPR and stringent effort is made to ensure that there was documented evidence of ownership before proceeding with any redevelopment. The situation is complex due to the lack of formal land ownership documents for many rural coastal areas, where traditional law provides the basis of most land ownership.
27. A contract checking system was put in place for review by consultants of all contracts for potential land ownership/acquisition issues before approval. This is particularly important for small-scale infrastructure covered under village grants where the locations were not prior identified in the SPPRs. The ADB also appointed a domestic NGO Bina Swadaya from mid-2006 to July 2008 to be responsible for community mobilization and some limited training activities that facilitated preparation of community contracts. Environmental guidelines were also prepared for community facilitators to identify potential environmental issues. With closure of Bina Swadaya contract in mid-2008, NACA took over management of 170 of the field staff, ie. community mobilization specialists and community facilitators, to good effect.
D. Outputs/Achievements
28. ETESP funds totaling around US$30,000,000 were channeled through government and consultant budgets, referred to as “on” and “off” budget respectively. Procurement processes have involved tendering, contracts, direct purchasing and community contracts all applied under an alliance of Grant Agreement and Keppres 80 rules.
29. Overall by April 2009, more than 23,700 fishers, aquaculture farmers, traders, fish sellers, including both men and women, have been assisted to resume livelihoods. In aquaculture, 3,178 ha of fish/shrimp ponds have been rehabilitated involving 4,793 beneficiaries and 51 private shrimp hatcheries have been rebuilt. Two marine fish hatcheries (DKP) in Nias and Simeulue, which were not yet functioning before the tsunami have been restored, new staff trained and are successfully spawning grouper fish. Aquaculture livelihoods grants have enabled 1,458 small scale fish farmers to resume aquaculture with cage farming, crabs, and others. Sixteen (16) packages of aquaculture infrastructure, including 26 pondoks (farmer meeting halls) have been completed by local construction. An innovative Aceh Aquaculture Communication Centre servicing shrimp farmers through internet has been established. Four (4) Aquaculture Livelihoods Service Centres have been established in Bireuen and Aceh Utara and are being run by farmers; the office buildings were restored, equipped and farmers trained in use of computers and internet, initially providing technical services and advice for up to 4,000 fish farmers.
7
Considerable potential for the model to be replicated exists in Aceh or elsewhere in Indonesia. An effective donor/GoI network and forum for aquaculture was established in early stages and has been active throughout the life of ETESP Fisheries (see para 39 and accompanying outputs table) 30. Fisheries livelihood grants have been disbursed through community contracts in 734 fisheries-dependent villages, providing equipment and other inputs to enable 17,862 small-scale fishers to restart their livelihoods. In addition, fifty five fisheries (55) infrastructure sites i.e. fish landings, wharves, markets, ice plants have been rebuilt to approved design, benefiting up to 30,000 fishers, traders, and workers. A total of 152 medium and large boats (in range 5 – 20GT) and fishing gear have been handed over to 1,575 fishers in fisher communities by March 2009. Eight (8) fisheries livelihoods service offices run by Panglima Laut (traditional fishers organization) office restored, equipped and staff trained to service upwards of 8,000 fishers. An innovative fish identification and market data system has been put in place and is being run through the fishers associations. Highly innovative fishing, marine underwater hazard and currents marine charts, involving more than 5 million data points, have been produced to benefit 3,000 fishers. These have been produced by active participation of fishers through three (3) Panglima Laut offices on the west and east coasts of Aceh. With the use of GPS and marine radios distributed by the ETESP Fisheries safety at sea has been much improved for around 12,000 fishers improved with radio communications installed linked to Marine Police who were not previously equipped. Ten (10) Banda Aceh university students are researching their theses in collaboration with the Panglima Laot and the fishers boding well for the future of the engagement of science with management and resource users. Strategic underwater discoveries in sea mounts and fissures have been made. Considerable potential for the model to be replicated elsewhere exists. 31. Services of provincial and district fishery offices have been rehabilitated and strengthened through the provision of training, equipment, vehicles and motorcycles and rehabilitation of offices. Local government staff have gained development and disaster recovery experience by working in association with the ETESP Fisheries component. They have experienced working in a participatory and facilitating rather than command position. Central GoI could also have learned serious management lessons as a consequence of ETESP implementation. 32. The coastal environment has benefitted from 1.2 million trees planted with 75% overall survival rate by ETESP fisheries component. In the process, the environmental approach of ETESP has been justified to advocacy groups and helped set standards for other agencies to follow, particularly in the aquaculture sub-component. 33. ETESP Fisheries throughout has placed great emphasis on the importance of restoring and improving human and social assets. To date a total of 8,768 people have had their knowledge and/or livelihoods skills improved through training and awareness raing activities. 25 % of training courses were funded on-budget and 75% off budget, demonstrating the mobility and flexibility of the consultants to handle training.
8
34. Technical and organizational training has been delivered through 127 training courses/packages and numerous training brochures, manuals and posters distributed by ETESP, several were prepared in collaboration with other donors or agencies. Three ETESP Fisheries related websites (www.acehfisheries.org ; www.tambak.org ; www.panglima.net ) are fully operational with 2 in the hands of local fisher and farmer organizations, and one operating from the inter-governmental Network for Aquaculture in Asia and Pacific. ETESP Fisheries data was progressively transferred to the PMO/EMS database, and both soft and hard copies of all reports, technical documents have been provided. Relevant information was also transferred to OISCA/JFPR management to assist their transitional support and consolidation of the both Aquaculture and Capture Fisheries Livelihoods Centres 35. There was a notable contribution to the success of ADB ETESP at CFAN 4, including 2 video films and a presentation of Sonar Mapping (CBBS) work was made to the President of Indonesia during his visit to Banda Aceh and inauguration of the tsunami museum. 36. To summarize, the ETESP Fisheries component has provided a considerable impact in recovery of tsunami affected coastal communities in Aceh and Nias, has focused much credit on the work of BRR and ADB, and should be regarded as a highly successful component. It has laid a foundation and opened opportunities for future development work in improving coastal livelihoods, poverty reduction and resource management which should logically be the focus for follow up investment.
1. Financial Performance
37. The table below shows overall planned commitments and contracts against actual disbursements up to May 2009 as recorded by the ADB PMO/EMS:
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORTFinancial Performance ‐ Summary 2005 ‐ 2009
Category No. Rahmad
Category No. Amin
Category Title
Contracts & Commitments to May 2009 US$ equiv
Disbursements to May 2009 US$ equiv
44b 8 Community Mobilisation 4,107.0 4,104.9 51b 5 Consulting Services 5,381.5 3,845.6 41b 4 Training 258.9 258.0 43b 7 Trials and Demonstrations 4.4 4.4 42b 6 Studies and Assessments 27.8 27.8 22b 3 Boats and Vehicles 3,454.6 3,430.1 21b 2 Equipment and Materials 4,531.4 4,529.4 10b 1 Civil Works 8,064.3 7,318.9 14b 1a Fishpond Rehabilitation 4,639.3 4,445.9
9
13b 1b Facilities 3,425.0 2,873.0
73b 9 Implementation and Supervision 1,319.2 1,319.9
Total 27,149.0 24,838.9 * Source: ADB PMO/EMS data ‐ May 2009
2. Outputs
38. The Performance Targets/Indicators and achievements for ETESP Fisheries are provided in the following tables: In considering the overall consolidated numbers of benificiaries expressed in the following summary table and elsewhere in the document some tolerance must be given to the degrees of precision. For example, the overall number of smaller fishing boats is quite accurately known and each boat has two crew, so any total number of benficiaries will be to the factor of 2. However, in expressing the number of beneficiaries from a public service such as a fish landing or private business such as a shrimp hatchery the numbers are more notional and less precise eg. 600 – 1,000 members of community or producers. The table also mostly considers primary beneficiaries
ON BUDGET – ETESP FISHERIES
Subcomponent 1: Community empowerment
1.1 Community contracts o 243 contracts issued/completed under SC1
o 17,862 beneficiaries
o Grants delivered through community contracts – contracts completed ~ 16% of ETESP overall budget
o Producer groups get experience in working with contracts
o Wide range of livelihoods restarted o Hygiene and industry licencing obtained
by producer groups
No Output Targets and Indicators Progress/achievements
ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT OBJECTIVES
Agricultural and fisheries production in the affected areas restored
o Fishponds on 3,000 ha are restored to pre‐tsunami levels by end 2007
o 3,178 ha restored before June 2009 o ETESP Fisheries ponds rehabilitation
directly benefitted 4,793 small scale aquaculture farmers and their families in Aceh and Nias before June 2009
o Other beneficiaries from aquaculture livelihoods activities total >6,235
o Many more will benefit from AACC/ALSC network
o Further beneficiaries from trading and marketing
o 13,000 small scale fishers resume fishing by end 2007
o ETESP Fisheries benefitted an estimated 18,000 small scale fishers and families in Aceh and Nias by June 2009
10
1.2 Funds disbursed o Rp.45,618,757,481 o Total amount on budget through DIPA 2006 ‐2007‐2008
1.3 Fishers/farmers trained o 17,862 beneficiaries o Relevant technical training associated with community contracts
Subcomponent 2: Restoration of capture fisheries
2.1 Boats & fishing gear o 141 boatso 5GT – 87 o 10GT – 18 o 15GT – 22 o 20GT – 14
o >300 small boats
o Larger boats tendered & contractedo Some smaller boats under community
contracts on Nias & Simeulue o Fishers consulted during design stage o Participatory monitoring by beneficiary
fishers during construction
2.2 o 141 sets of fishing gear o To accompany boats
o 600 fishing lights o Floating & submersible lampso 1200 beneficiaries o Total cost Rp.656,560,000
2.3 Fishers trained o 1,599 trainees o Training in gear, boat design, GPS, fish finders, radio, etc.
Subcomponent 3: Restoration of aquaculture facilities
3.1 Shrimp/milkfish ponds restored/ operational
o 2,943ha ponds restoredo 3,305 beneficiaries o 6 Districts benefitted
o Note the successful use of community contracts ~500 community contracts issued by SC3
3.2 Agroinputs provided o Value Rp24,144,071,420o Sufficient to startup
2,462ha
o Note the successful use of community contracts
o Similar beneficiaries number to 3.1
3.3 Shrimp Hatcheries o 49 hatcheries rebuilt & operational
o 49 primary beneficiaries o >3,500 secondary.
beneficiaries (farmers, traders)
o Assistance offered to 52 hatcherieso Note the successful use of community
contracts – success 49 out of 52 (>94%) investments.
3.4 Cage culture units o Grouper – 47 Unitso Grouper nurseries – 27
units o Crabs – 31 units o Tilapia – 4 units o Lobster – 4 units o Total 2,540 beneficiaries
o Alternate aquaculture livelihoodso Note the successful use of community
contracts
3.5 Grouper Hatcheries o BBIP, Fino, Niaso BBIP, Simeulue
o Non‐operational pre‐tsunami/earthquakes
o Rebuilt, equipped and improved o New local staff appointed by DKP o 16 DKP staff trained by ETESP
Consultants in 2 BBIP o Both hatcheries now active and
spawning grouper
3.6 Seaweed farming o Production units set up o Prospective seaweed farmers (men and
11
o Nias – 3 unitso Nisel – 6 units
o Beneficiaries ‐ 145 o Farmers trained
women) encouraged to form cooperating groups which were trained by NACA and national consultants in farming techniques, processing and marketing. Bulk harvesting and marketing required to overcome relatively low value/volume ratio of product and to achieve quantities which are feasible for buyers to transport with adequate economies of scale from remote locations.
o Trials carried out in coordination with COREMAP show that the southern islands of the Nias group (P.Telo, Hibala, etc) have the best water quality conditions for seaweed; trials elsewhere in Nias were less successful
o Seaweed produced was marketed in trial quantities to Jakarta buyers and to COREMAP for replication as seed stock
3.7 Fish farmer training o 5,455 beneficiarieso 9 districts, 2 municipalities
o The tilapia, grouper, seaweed, pond farmer construction have been fully supported with practical on site training.
o Simeulue grouper farmers have marketed their products.
o Nias and Nias Selatan seaweed farming supported by ADB ETESP Fisheries have revealed positive influence in regions. Some villages/investors/other donors (Coremap) have replicated seaweed farming in Nias Selatan.
o Hatchery operators have financed and started their own fish hatcheries independently after receiving fish hatchery training.
o Farmers’ skills in better management practices improved.
3.8 Manuals, brochures, posters
o 35 publicationso ~25,000 beneficiaries
o Coordination between donors and GoI to produce BMP and distribute manuals, posters
o Village by village BMP video film shows
3.9 Publicity o Websiteo Newspapers – national and
international o Video
o www.acehfisheries.org o BMP for aquaculture video joint
production by ADB/NACA/FAO/IFC/WWF.
Subcomponent 4: Restoration of small‐scale fisheries post‐harvest facilities
12
4.1 Fish landings/ jetties o 19 rebuilto 8,523 beneficiaries
o Major policy shift required on ownership and management from “state/local government asset” to producer group.
o Where possible co‐management advice and training given
o ETESP unable to tackle estuarine access and perennial dredging problem
4.2 Fish markets o 4 rebuilto 4,000 beneficiaries
o Major policy shift required on ownership and management from “state/local government asset” to market user group.
o Where possible co‐management advice and training given by consultants
4.3 Packing sheds o 1 rebuilto 100 beneficiaries
o * ditto *
4.4 Deep wells o 2 rebuilto 600 beneficiaries
o * ditto *
4.5 Marine fuel depots o 11 rebuilto 5,500 beneficiaries
o * ditto *o General public also benefit from local
availability of kerosene, petrol, lubricants
4.6 Ice plants o 4 ice plants built o 4 ice plants built: Aceh Utara, Aceh Jaya, Simeulue, Nias and Nias Selatan
o Economies of scale apply and early survey showed that ice plants of less than 10 tonnes/day output and sales are unlikely to be self‐sustaining
o Nias ice plants were originally designedto be mobile/transportable as it was expected that they would be moved from their original sites in Gunung Sitoli and Teluk Dalam, to Tehemburua and Lahusa respectively, when ice factories which BRR was planning were built. This did not transpire
o After further intervention by consultants at request of BRR and ADB, the two Nias ice plants were rendered fully functional and handed over to public‐private (kerjasama) arrangements by July 2009
Subcomponent 5: Coastal ecosystem restoration
5.1 Trees planted o 1,274,952 o Mangroves principally replanted to “green” rehabilitated tambaks
o Casuarina, Coconut trees planted on West Coast to enhance dune/swale coastal environment
5.2 Farmer training o 5,000 beneficiaries o Shrimp farmers and villagers now more
13
aware of better management practicesand eco friendly production
5.3 Schools awareness campaigns
o 3 campaignso 500 beneficiaries
o Childrens’ environmental knowledge improved. Teachers provided with materials for subsequent improvement of curricula
5.4 Posters/brochures/manuals o 10 publicationso 5,000 beneficiaries
o Range of environmental posters/brochures/manuals produced
Subcomponent 6: Fisheries support services
6.1 DKP offices rebuilt o Locations: Nias, Nias Selatan, Banda Aceh,Lhokseumawe
o Furniture & equipment provided
o Offices rebuilt after tsunamio Total cost Rp. 1,594,121,900 o Approx. no. GoI staff in offices (estimate)
• 1 district = 50 staff • 4 district= 200 staff
6.2 DKP vehicles provided o 11 Districts – 1 vehicle each o DKP Districts supplied with vehicles and motorcycles in order to effectively service ETESP fieldwork
6.3 DKP equipment provided o 11 Districts – 4 motorcycles each
o Motorcycles to DKP NAD & Panglima Laot
o DKP Districts provided computers, printers, water test kits, etc. to effectively service ETESP work
o Training given where needed
6.4 DKP experience through involvement in Satker and DIU
o 11 DKP District affected o Local DKP gains experience in implementing international grant programme
o Local DKP gains knowledge through association with innovative approaches eg. Sonar Mapping, LSC‐CF, AACC, ALSC
o DKP local staff boosted at BBIP Nias/Simeulue and trained
o Innovative producer group services begin to replace non‐functional top‐down fisheries extension system
o Training/TOR/guidelines provided
6.5 Assets handover to Ladong MMAF Training Centre
o Furniture, computers, printers, etc
o Received donation of ETESP fisheries assets at end of project
o Actually this style of training centre had very limited capacity and provided little input for the participatory, community focussed ETESP Fisheries component.
OFF BUDGET ‐ ETESP FISHERIES ‐ INNOVATIVE LIVELIHOODS DEVELOPMENT
7.1 Community marine mapping and livelihoods improved
o Website formed www.panglima.net
o 350 new marine charts delivered
o Fish identification booklet delivered
o PL staff trained in use of
o Fishers shared knowledge and skills restored and enhanced
o Traditional fishers organization Panglima Laot engages in resource survey, research and management
o Traditional fishers organization Panglima Laot evolving into a business association
14
sonar equipment, GPS, computers, mapping, radio communications
o 90 GPS/fishfinder units distributed and returning information
o 10 university student projects ongoing
o 175 captains trained in GPS/navigation
o Total beneficiaries 2,835+ o Video “Mapping the Sea,
Improving Livelihoods” o Presidential visit
presentation
attractive to investment o Fishers collect, own, understand and use
data about resources and market prices o Linkages between fishers, PL, DKP,
Marine Police, University, AGDC o Participatory research ongoing o Scientific data as basis for co‐
management of natural resources in hands of fishers
o Inputs to CFAN4 exposition o President visit to Aceh 03 Feb 2009 o ADB VIP visits o Video publicised on ADB YouTube site
7.2 Aquaculture Livelihoods
• Aceh Aquaculture Communications Centre
• Aquaculture Livelihoods Service Centres
o 4 Aquaculture Livelihoods Service Centres set up with producer groups in Bireuen and Aceh Utara.
o 1 Aceh Aquaculture Communications Centre set up at MMAF BBAP to provide technical services to ALSC’s
o Website established
o Basis for participative fish farmer producer associations set up with opportunities for investment and clustering.
o Linkages for continuity with FAO‐ARC Aquaculture, also WWF and IFC.
o Promotion of Best Management Practices (BMP)
o Interactive information services established in network
o Technical services provided basis of extension service
7.3 Fisheries Livelihoods
• Capture Fisheries – Livelihoods Service Centres
o Panglima Laot assisted to form network of 8 Livelihoods Service Centres for fishers
o 2 radio communications centres built
o 24 training courses to 680 future LSC based trainers given
o PL newsletter circulated to 8,000 fishers/traders
o Safety at sea improved o Fishers technical skills improved o Fishers understanding of business and
markets improved o Basis for participative fisher producer
associations set up with opportunities for investment and clustering.
o Communication and safety at sea improved
7.4 Training/Capacity Building o 24 training courseso 4,284 trainees
o Training for fishfarmers and fisherso NACA off‐budget provided innovative
training particularly to enhance the livelihoods of beneficiaries of assets from ETESP
o Institutionalised GoI training difficult to provide community level training
7.5 JFPR‐OISCA o Advice provided by NACA to reformulation of project
o Systems and information transferred to JFPR‐OISCA
o Unique and innovative systems transferred to JFPR for continuity and ultimately sustainability
o Contributions to JFPR‐IHS database
15
project
7.6 ADB PMO/EMS Database o Information/data set provided to PMO/EMS database
o Information/data provided on development of ETESP Fisheries component
o Guidelines, manuals, reports, photos
7.7 ADB PMO/EMS
Publicity
o Positive publicity for ADB ETESP
o Numerous instances of low to high profile positive publicity in media.
o Intervention to protect ADB ETESP against advocacy NGO attack
o 4 websites developed and operating o 3 websites user interactive/beneficiary
owned
7.8 ADB PMO/EMS
Publicity
o Reports as requiredo Videos
o Servicing PMO/EMS technical, administrative and financial reporting
o Active websites (4) o Inputs to CFAN4 exposition o President visit to Aceh Feb 2009‐03‐02 o ADB VIP visits o Video on ADB YouTube site
16
II. Component Rating
A. Component Factors
39. The following table rates a number of factors on a scale: HS (highly satisfactory), S (satisfactory), PS (partly satisfactory), U (unsatisfactory) or NA (not applicable)
Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting rating1. Design (quality of framework
or design logic) HS o Original ETESP project design provided adequate scope and
flexibility for the project purpose, ie. contribution to the restoration of livelihoods in Aceh and Nias post tsunami and conflict.
o Design was challenging due to several factors: operating over 11 districts/kotas which included remote islands; other donors and NGOs active at the same time; ensuring effective participation; ensuring environmental conformity; inadequate capacity among local institutions.
o In many cases, beneficiary participation was instrumental in design and took community opportunities and needs into the design process.
o Administrative or procedural design required considerable modification in order to provide compatibility between ADB and GoI systems.
2. In-project planning process. Concept notes, SPPRs, IEEs etc
S o Project planning process was lengthy due to the complexity of the project operating 6 sub-components in 11 districts plus later development of livelihoods approaches towards sustainability.
o Planning was more attuned to a development process, than an emergency situation. However, this was dealt with by stage-wise planning and implementation.
o In project planning process was largely conducted by consultants in consultation with BRR, DKP district and local community beneficiaries.
o It was a lengthy but thorough process; more attuned to development than emergency.
o Process of DCN, SPAR, SPRR, IEE and ADRs allowed for good focus on activities with accompanying justification.
o Some changes in infrastructure and locations required designs and addenda to SPPR/ADR.
3. Adequacy of budget and budget processes
S o Putting the budget through government enabled the government to have an intimate role in component implementation.
o However, the shortcomings of the established system caused annual delays to release of funds for implementation.
o Adjustments to budget were required throughout the project to meet the general inflation in Indonesia, and Aceh in particular.
o Old fashioned audit system focusing on blame and punish rather than assistance to improve procedures
17
Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting rating4. Adequacy of material/human
resources PS o In the post-tsunami situation there was a shortage of skilled
manpower. o This was countered by introduction of experts from elsewhere
in Indonesia, although efforts were made wherever possible to use expertise from Aceh.
o The implementation of the anti-logging and timber laws provided a particular problem to boat building through increasing scarcity of timber.
5. Innovation in design and/or implementation
HS o Community contracts for a wide range of livelihood activities o BMPs in shrimp and fish farming o Satellite imagery used for tambak rebuilding o Innovative community bathymetric survey, mapping and
research o Aceh Aquaculture Communication Centres, Aquaculture and
Capture Fisheries Livelihood Services Centres providing interactive information network for farmers
o Complaints handling system 6. Implementation performance HS o Given extended initial planning, budgetary delays, changes in
management units, implementation, although taking longer than the original target, has not only been achieved but has been exceeded with addition of the innovative activities and training activities above.
o Targets achieved and in some cases greatly exceeded despite delays
7. Tendering/procurement/ disbursement performance
PS o Government tendering committees and procedures overall achieved their purpose of tendering and contracting.
o Huge paperwork overload o Subsequent reporting and documentation had difficulties
meeting ADB procedural standards o Frequent change of PMU and tendering committees led to
delays. o Disbursement slow to start each year and became rapid at
end of budget year. o Apparent performance often marred by over-zealous
consideration of institutional procedures. 8. Land acquisition processes NA o ETESP Fisheries did not enter into any land acquisition
arrangements o All infrastructure and fishpond reconstruction sought clear
evidence of and documented owner and ownership. 9. Contractor performance PS o In many cases, the performance of tendered contractors was
not satisfactory. o Small size of tendered contracts did not attract top contracting
firms with sufficient skills and resources which led to difficulties of contractors giving timely delivery and good quality of work.
o In the case of boats, tendered contractors acted as middlemen to build boats. The relationship between contractor and boatyard was often difficult. In some cases, substandard work by some tendered contractors required the contracts to be cancelled.
o Community contracts on the other hand provided a very
18
Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting ratingviable alternative providing they were well facilitated and monitored.
o Community contracts not only provided the opportunity of creating local employment but involved communities in the planning, implementation and reporting of their own activities thereby securing valuable social development post-conflict, in addition to delivering assets.
10. Performance of preparation/ implementation consultants (i) International
S o Consultants fulfilled the requirements and met necessary
standards. 11. (ii) Local S o Consultants generally fulfilled the requirements and met
necessary standards with only 2 exceptions out of a large team.
o Two consultant Site Advisers in Pidie and Bireuen were dismissed when caught by internal monitoring and complaints system engaged in extracting gratifications from ETESP Fisheries beneficiaries. This was later followed by BPK action against local DKP officials engaged in related illegal activity
12. Recruitment and processing of consultant contract variations
S o Initial lengthy processing of Contract Variations but considerable improvements when PMO/EMS was delegated more responsibility
o In a project of the size of ETESP and with the scope of all the (sub) components, it is understandable that Contract Variations would be numerous and rather lengthy to process.
o PMO/EMS has responded to urgent requests in timely and helpful manner.
13. Performance of Implementing Agency/Satker/EA/National ministry
S o Although there were frequent changes to the Satkers, the overall trend in performance of the Satkers became better over the life of the component.
o During last 2 years, presence of an active BRR Director of Fisheries greatly enhanced the coordination and performance of the Satker.
o In some cases, Satkers struggled to match the aspirations of the component design leading to the impression of underperformance.
o Degree of bureaucracy they both generated and had to contend with increased the difficulties in performance.
o Timely and accurate reporting on contracts has been a great difficulty for the implementing agency.
o Except for the first nine months of the project (2005-2006), the National Ministry has not been greatly involved in the implementation of ETESP Fisheries although some of its staff were seconded in the Satker
o Provincial Fisheries Dept DKP NAD and District DKP NAD and Nias much weakened by decentralization.
14. Component management and support by ADB
HS o ETESP Fisheries greatly benefited as more decision making authority was delegated to the PMO/EMS during the span of the project.
o PMO/EMS has provided vital management and knowledge so necessary at local level.
19
Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting ratingo Financial advances made by NACA to ensure continued
consultant operations caused substantial financial difficulties for the consultant firm (NACA).
15. Beneficiary participation (i) in design
HS o Beneficiary participation in design has been a guiding principle in ETESP Fisheries with beneficiaries involved in all sub-components as befits a livelihood approach.
o 732 community contracts were issued involving participatory design of which the majority produced the expected results and potentially formed the basis for continued livelihood development.
o Beneficiary groups did cope with pressures from elite groups and this sense their achievements are more the remarkable
16. (ii) in implementation HS o Under the pressures that existed in post-conflict and post-tsunami Aceh, community participation was not easy to facilitate and required time and resources to implement, and will continue to need strengthening in future.
o However, achievements of ETESP fisheries can be regarded as historic in this respect.
17. Ownership by beneficiaries/ groups/CBOs
S o Experience with fishers and pond owners has shown a strong tendency for beneficiaries to take ownership of the development process, if encouraged.
o However, there is not yet an effective local government and local institutional support network to encourage such participation and ownership of development activities and processes.
18. Ownership by implementing agency
S o BRR as an EA and IA was a temporary organization thatdissolved in early 2009.
o However, they showed reasonable management and leadership in implementing the component.
o Ownership of assets by the implementing agency was not an objective though there has been some confusion in this respect.
19. Ownership by other government organizations
S o This has been a point of contention as to whether the assets provided by ETESP Fisheries are owned by government (on behalf of state) or communities.
o Where necessary, ETESP Fisheries has tried to encourage and support a co-management arrangement or other working relationships between local government and communities.Local government as a service provider rather than controller is encouraged.
o Partnership with local government organizations has largely been achieved through their involvement in the Satker and DIU. However, there exists a good sense of cooperation between the Provincial fishery service offices in both NAD and SUMUT even if ham strung by imperfect decentralized institutional processes.
o In the very specific cases of the BBIP on Simeulue and Nias, both Provincial governments have shown commitment and taken the necessary steps for the continuity of the resourcing and functioning of these assets.
20
Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting rating20. Involvement by or relationship
with NGOsa HS o Bina Swadaya
o Training sub-contracts/agreements involving Indonesian NGOs
o Panglima Laot o Film making, brochure design by local NGO o Aquaculture coordination group involving international NGOs:
WWF, ARC, OISCA, Oxfam, Terre Des Hommes (TDH) Italy o Discussion on Green Aceh policy affecting fisheries and
coastal environment o Dealing with NGO advocacy groups
21. Ownership by private sector organizations
HS o Private sector organizations – small and medium scale producers and traders of Aceh and Nias –are the driving force of economic development in the provinces.
o ETESP Fisheries has specifically targeted these groups in line with the goal of ETESP
o Involvement of banking sector through ETESP Micro-financeand prospective linkage with ALSC and CF-LSC
22. Linkage to + coordination with other reconstruction programs: (i) Other ETESP components
HS o Overall strong linkages with other livelihood sector components (agriculture and microfinance).
o Information shared with SPEM. o Detailed information provided to ADB PMO/EMS database
23. (ii) Bi/multilateral projects HS o Good links established with various bilateral/multilateral projects and donors involved with fisheries and aquaculture projects in Aceh and Nias (ADB Coremap, Ausaid, FAO, IFC, JFPR, UNDP, WorldFish Center)
24. (iii) NGOs HS o ARC, OISCA, Oxfam, Terre Des Hommes (TDH) Italy, WWF
25. (iv) Government projects HS o Full coordination wherever possible with BRR planning though this had multiple objectives
o Where advised by BRR of GoI funded projects (APBN and APBD) plans were jointly made to undertake ETESP action and investment which would not conflict
o Through DKP Sumut and DKP Nias/Nisel it was possible for ETESP to work together with APBD, APBN and COREMAP funds eg. BBIP, ice plants, seaweed
o Coordination with government funded BBIP on Simeulue and Nias
o AACC together with BBAP Ujung Batee (MMAF) o BBIP Nias with ADB Coremap
26. Compliance with national and local policies
HS o All actions taken in compliance with national and local policyeven if not very helpful to efficient delivery.
27. Degree to which component has contributed to policy development
HS o Investments made by ETESP Fisheries could influence future change in policy (eg. rural development, livelihoods approach, pro-poor, co-management of infrastructure, sonar mapping etc).
o Possible creation of development model through information services (AACC) to aquaculture farmers
28. Approach to social and community development
HS o Social and community development was implicit in the design of ETESP Fisheries, and major attention has been given to
21
Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting ratingthis aspect.
29. Approach to gender and development
S o Community contract process has encouraged women’s participation throughout
o Examples include small-scale tuna processing, dried fish, seaweed, oysters and other activities.
o Women were employed in the Satker and consultant team 30. Approach to environmental
management and monitoring HS o Throughout design, planning and implementation,
environmental management and monitoring has received the highest degree of attention.
o Implementation guidelines, manuals and other documentation gave strong emphasis on environmental management.
o Better management practice manual for shrimp farming recognized as key guidance document for Aceh aquaculture rehabilitation by government, donors and NGO sector.
o Training was provided with strong emphasis on environmental management of aquaculture
o More than 1 million trees have been planted and awareness campaigns mounted in several districts.
o GOI environmental regulations have been complied with o Sonar mapping has contributed to lost and new knowledge of
the marine environment o Assistance to spawn groupers and improve lobster holding
has potential to reduce impacts on coral reefs in Nias,Simeulue and Pulau Aceh
31. Governance (including corruption)
S o ETESP Fisheries has been aware of cases of extortion assumed to be by ex-combatants but this has normally been dealt with by the beneficiary groups themselves.
o Beneficiary groups were held fully accountable for transparent reporting of their expenditure.
32. Complaints and complaint handling/media issues (+/-)
HS o Serious complaints were dealt with on a case-by-case basis under a system agreed with PMO/EMS and BRR both of which operated complaints handling mechanisms.
o As reported at point 11 previously, there was later BPK/audit action against local DKP officials engaged in related illegal activity involving ETESP funds
o A small number of complaints from beneficiaries, other agencies and NGOs have been dealt with satisfactorily.
o ETESP Fisheries kept track of newspaper, radio and TV articles concerning its activities and was able to record positive comment as well as deal with negative criticism.
o ETESP Fisheries consultants were able to assist PMO/EMS deal with international and national environmental advocacy groups.
o The component itself has created four web sites, which disseminate information on an international scale.
o Articles have appeared in national and international press (eg Sonar mapping in Christian Science Monitor) that have highlighted the achievements of ETESP Fisheries.
o Videos of aquaculture and mapping the sea were presented to the press at the CFAN4 conference and the occasion of the President of Indonesia’s visit to Aceh at the request of BRR
22
Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting ratingand ADB.
o The aquaculture BMP video has wide showing to popular audiences totaling several thousand throughout Aceh
33. Monitoring & Evaluation (i) Internal
S o ETESP consultants have played a major role in monitoring of all sub-components during the 3.5 years of implementation. Consultants mobilized a large field team in order to do this.
o Intensive monitoring by consultants covered for deficiencies in supervision
o Monitoring by the MONEV unit of BRR also contributed o Occasional spot visits by PMO/EMS
34. (ii) External S o Queries from auditors and anticorruption bodies (BKP) were dealt with systematically, these tended to be repetitive and non-constructive in nature.
35. Handover S o Handover of assets to implementing agencies, districts and beneficiaries has been fully agreed with BRR
o Normal government procedure requires that infrastructure assets to be handed to DKP. There has been variable response to BRR and consultant attempts to influence this process to further hand over to the private sector or community beneficiary organizations.
o May be delayed by transition from BRR to BKANR.
B. Ratings
40. The ETESP Fisheries Component has been rated against the four evaluation criteria listed in the table below, following information contained in the file <PPER guidelines excerpt.doc> which was circulated and then further modified. The full guidelines which were followed were available at http://www.adb.org/Documents/Guidelines/Evaluation/PPER-PSO/default.asp. Information which supports these ratings is given in the previous table and the survey report in Appendix 9
Criterion Rating Description
Rating Value
Weight (% ) Notes
1. Relevance Highly Relevant 3 20
o Key livelihood sector supported o Highly relevant to coastal population o High levels of poverty
2. Effectiveness Highly Effective
3 30 o Targets achieved or exceeded
3. Efficiency Efficient 2 30 o Capital structures demonstrate positive IRR/RoC.
4. Sustainability Likely 2 20 o Likelihood that human, institutional, financial, and
other resources are sufficient to maintain the outcome over its economic life.
Overall assessment 2.7 o Highly successful
C. Impact
1. Institutional
41. The primary focus of ETESP’s activities has been in rehabilitating assets. However, human capacity strengthening has not been neglected and has focused on the recipients of the
23
assets, including the community and public sector. There are a number of benefits that have transpired:
• Many fishers and farmers are more aware of better management and sustainability issues. ETESP is also providing for institutional strengthening through the Livelihood Service Centres that will retain a capacity to train and act as a centre for information and business/marketing development. Other donors may assist further strengthening of the LCCs post ETESP;
• DKP NAD and DKP Districts NAD and Nias have been the recipients of new offices,
office equipment, vehicles, motorcycles and computers in 11 coastal administrative Districts. These should improve the logistic capacity of Dinas to service the fisheries sector;
• ETESP has placed a heavy focus on community participation. This includes
instruction of DIU personnel, who will in turn return to DKP. It is hoped that lessons learned will help to counter and change the autocratic, top down approach entrenched within Indonesia’s institutionalized decision making processes;
• The training processes have also encouraged the use of field facilitators. This will
leave the Government and private sector with in-house training capacity;
• ETESP has highlighted the need for co-management for the care of fisheries infrastructure assets. It is hoped that the Government organisations will follow the guidelines and partnership MoUs developed and facilitated by ETESP in order to ensure the longer term ownership, management and sustainability of these assets.
2. Socio-economic
42. The intended socio-economic impact of ADB ETESP Fisheries component was to restore fisheries production by mid 2008 so that average household incomes would be at half pre-disaster level2. A survey undertaken by NACA consultants in late 2008 showed that BRR ADB ETESP assistance had restored the livelihoods of 28,421 beneficiaries in the fisheries and aquaculture sector, and 8,258 in infrastructure. The projected value added generated from fisheries and aquaculture activities was estimated at that time to be Rp157 billion (US$ 17.5 million). This could be an underestimation since further activities have been completed in 2009 which would increase these values although no follow up survey has been made to confirm (appendix 9)
43. In the case of the fishery sector, income has risen by 10% with average household income of Rp 3.56 million / month / beneficiary. It has been difficult to quantify the changes to income in the aquaculture sector. Indications are that some communities have seen their income grow by between 40%-70% with recorded annual incomes of Rp 1.71million / month / beneficiary (Appendix 13). However, in other cases, there have been only modest changes in income, or even a failure to achieve realistic returns. Community grants have also had similar positive outcomes with average incomes rising 94% to Rp1.9 million / month / beneficiary. Additional upstream and downstream benefits are generated for input suppliers 2 ADB Report and recommendations of the President, March 2005
24
and traders. A sign of additional household benefit resulting from these activities include support to Provincial food security, some 4,283 tons (sea caught fish and farmed milkfish), now supplied to domestic consumers, an increase in the frequency of household meals, a restoration of children’s education, household improvements and equipment and the purchasing of motorcycles. Most beneficiaries, following the support of ADB ETESP assistance, are now able to contemplate longer term investment plans. The programme has also restored 3,000 ha of tambak generating 800 tons of shrimp for the export market.
44. The viability of most infrastructure assets as evaluated during the sub project preparation stage (Ice plants, SPDNs, BBMs, shrimp hatcheries, BBIP). Summary IRRS and NPVS are shown in Tables 12 and 18 of Appendix 10. In such cases the models predicted viable returns on investments with IRRs between 15% and 126%, with significant prospects for generating value to the Provincial economy. However, a number of problems have materialised which has slowed the hand over process to community and private assets. These include the reluctance by some local Governments to hand over ownership to community organisations. On a sub project level, problems have been encountered with delays in connecting ice plants to the local electricity network (PLN) and difficulty in securing fuel supply licences for SPDNs and BBMs.
45. The Gender action plan3 has been implemented to the extent that 6,558 women have been engaged as a result of fisheries and aquaculture activities. Women’s activities range from direct beneficiaries (3,775) of village grants with wage parity with other male kelompok groups, to support activities (net mending, fish drying, small scale aquaculture and others). In the case of village grants women’s business activities were singled out as priority beneficiaries, and in some cases, women have been the direct beneficiaries of practical and business training, e.g. seaweed, grouper marine cages and fish processing.
3. Socio-economic Survey 2008 & Financial and Economic Analysis of SC1, SC2, SC3 & SC4
46. The detailed results of a rapid socio-economic field study of ETESP Fisheries outcomes undertaken at the end of 2008 of the impacts of the sub-components SC1 Community Empowerment, SC2 Capture Fisheries, SC3 Aquaculture and SC4 Fisheries Infrastructure are presented in Appendix 9.
47. It is difficult to quantitatively assess the impact on poverty of any activity in the fisheries sector unless special assessment and monitoring of poverty and livelihoods are undertaken. The national data as fielded through MapFrame during the ETESP planning stages unfortunately aggregates fisheries data under agriculture making assessment impossible.
48. However, subjective observation suggests that the ETESP has had a significant impact in the coastal fisheries communities where it has worked delivering financial, physical, human and social assets. In some cases natural assets have been enhanced. In the Aceh and offshore islands the capacity to generate considerable wealth through fisheries and aquaculture is very evident but the processes by which this wealth would alleviate
3 Table A8.2: Gender Action Plan, ADB Report and recommendations of the President, March 2005
25
poverty are not yet in place and should be an area of considerable concern to the larger international organizations such as ADB.
4. Technological
49. Best management practices for aquaculture have been introduced and advice is being actively disseminated to coastal fish and shrimp farmers and supported by printed manual and advice from TA in the field as well as from the AACC. Satellite imagery was used as the basis for tambak redesign and recovery by NACA consultants and BRR.
50. An innovative Aceh Aquaculture Communication Centre has been set up and is now functioning as part of services to coastal fish and shrimp farmers. The AACC has interactive internet connections with farmers at 4 Aquaculture Livelihoods Service Centres who can seek advice from specialists at the GoI Ujung Batee Brackish Water Aquaculture Centre (BBAP). This new approach is aimed at replacing the defunct fisheries extension service in the support to reestablish the privately owned aquaculture sector. A farmer owned website has been established which provides news, advice, shrimp market prices, inputs costs, banking advice, etc.
51. Highly innovative Sonar Mapping (Community Based Bathymetric Survey) has engaged the traditional fishers’ leaders Panglima Laot and fishers in collaborative activities using commercially available fish finder/ GPS to compile data, analyze it and produce accurate fisher charts showing depths, currents, navigational obstacles, fishing hazards. It further relates this spatial information to fisher contributed data on fish catch and market prices compiled into a database owned by the PL and fishers themselves thereby laying the foundations for empowerment of the fishers associations to actively participate in fisheries resource management. Two fisher owned websites have been established which provides news, advice, fish market prices, banking advice, etc.
52. The technology has also been effectively used to clear the estuaries of hazardous boat wrecks left after the tsunami. There is now a greatly enhanced collaboration between Panglima Laot, DKP, Harbour Master, TNI and Marine police in this respect. The fishers’ ability to search and rescue has been much enhanced by introduction of radio equipment, training in its use and synchronization with the Marine police system.
53. A video “Mapping the Seas, Improving Livelihoods” was presented at CFAN4, to the President of Indonesia in Banda aceh at BRR request and is now featured by ADB on YouTube website.
5. Environmental
54. The ADB placed great importance on preventing or averting any negative environmental impact from activities undertaken by ETESP and to that end employed an international Environmental Adviser (PMO/EMS) and national specialist. The NACA consultant also employed both international aquaculture and environment, and national coastal environmental specialists.
55. A system of REA and IEE applied particularly to infrastructure rehabilitation has been explained earlier in this report and a list of respective reports is provided in Appendix 11. These reports were approved by the national environmental agency BAPEDALDA.
26
56. Concerns of NGOs have been addressed in respect of impact of shrimp farming and mangrove rehabilitation. Wide scale introduction of best management practices by all donors in a coordinated campaign together with an international NGO (WWF) is working towards eco-friendly aquaculture production and products.
57. The combined actions of ETESP advisers and consultants with agreement of BRR have resulted in the planning and implementation of greening of coastal aquaculture with mangroves and school awareness campaigns resulting in positive publicity for ADB. Cooperation with FAO and IFC through a series of videos, manuals and posters dissemination, and radio shows has reached nearly 25,000 farmers and coastal people.
58. In addition to the promotion of environmentally sustainable aquaculture achieved through training and awareness raising and practical demonstrations of environmentally sustainable aquaculture management in ETESP Fisheries supported villages, ETESP Fisheries has encouraged environmentally sound aquaculture products, which can take advantage of the premium and demand in international markets. This increasing demand and prices can be translated into improved incomes and livelihoods of local producers. This approach was initiated by ETESP and can be sustained through joint actions of the innovative ALSC network in association with OISCA/JFPR, and other partners showing an interest in cooperating with the network.
59. Restoration of two marine fish hatcheries (BBIP) on the islands of Simeulue and Nias have the prospect of reducing the pressure on fish populations of coral reefs by supplying grouper seed for the growing cage farming industry.
60. The restoration of fish landing sites in many places has drawn attention locally to the need for a government/private contracted service for regular dredging of estuary mouths. Sediment loads from rivers and sea rapidly accumulate under the influence of marine currents to form sand bars which obstruct navigation and access. ADB has complexities to address this issue due to stringent environmental requirements surrounding all dredging activities.
61. The imposition of timber supply licencing (FAKO) in Aceh caused considerable impact and difficulty to boat yards to obtain supplies of good quality timber. Local conservative tradition towards wood as the sole boat building material so far strictly limits the application of other materials. This might be overcome if GRP hulls were built complying with traditional design.
62. The Community Based Bathymetric Survey (Sonar Mapping) project has reduced fishing damage to reefs, has located hazards and has identified potential marine special interest areas which could be sustained on a co-management basis. The use of GPS has reduced fuel usage by the fleet. Sea safety has been improved with use of communications and GPS.
63. ETESP has encouraged investment in larger fishing vessels and diversification of fishing effort away from heavily exploited coastal resources. Capture Fisheries Livelihood Service Centres allied to the Sonar Mapping initiative could continue to assist having gained respect and acceptance of fisher group leaders.
27
64. The preference to build small shallow draft boats for reef gleaning (highly profitable lobsters, aquarium fish, sea cucumber, etc) was noted when planning community livelihoods grants in Nias and Simeulue islands. These export market driven, coastal livelihoods strategies need careful co-management in these economically disadvantaged locations.
III. Issues
65. Issues were dealt with throughout life span of the ETESP and discussed elsewhere in this report, particularly under lessons learnt. No special issues are reported here in this section.
IV. Lessons Learnt
66. The ETESP Fisheries has, apart from the primary objective of rehabilitating livelihoods of coastal people, after the earthquake and tsunami, generated a wealth of lessons concerning the rehabilitation and recovery of livelihoods impacted by disasters. Equally, it has been able to recognize the challenges that lie ahead for fisheries and aquaculture development in Aceh and Nias beyond 2009. 67. “Lessons learned” is a widely adapted term in the context of technical assistance and in fact in many cases only covers observations and reinforcement of pre- known ideas and practices. For the consultants, ETESP Fisheries has often been a difficult process as it tried to work its way through the complexity of rules and procedures at the interface of ADB and GoI, and initially in climate of uncertainty and chaos, particularly soon after the disasters. The “lessons learned” from the experience could therefore not be all benign. The lessons are plentiful from ETESP Fisheries but with changes in the IA, PMU, BRR Directors, Satkers, local government, and other related institutions, it is perhaps unfortunate there will have been limited institutional memory retained. Any criticism in this section is not aimed at individuals or organizations only the systems and procedures within which they operate, and which in some cases are perhaps overdue for substantial change, if the sector is to further develop and attain sustainability.
68. Technically, ETESP Fisheries has been extraordinarily successful in achieving more than its original design aims. However, in hind sight one will remember it as a complicated project to implement and ponder that there must be easier and more efficient and effective ways of achieving the same ends. The satisfaction of completion lies entirely in what has been achieved against such odds. This section provides key lessons learned in the implementation of ETESP Fisheries and covers various aspects namely assessment and planning, implementation, finance and financial management, governance, communications, monitoring and evaluation and policy and institutions.
Assessment, design and planning
69. The initial phase of ETESP Fisheries implementation involved detailed assessments of impacts and needs, completion of documentation (such as the Project Concept Notes required by BRR; the SPAR and SPPR required by ADB; and EIA required by ADB and GOI). This process built on initial planning work conducted during preparation of the ETESP Project, but inevitably took time and was perhaps overly complex. This process reduced the emergency aspect but improved developmental prospects of ETESP once the immediate humanitarian crisis associated with the earthquake and tsunami was reduced.
28
70. The time required for implementation was longer than initially planned. Time was extended through annual appointment/re-planning/reorientation exercises with new Project Management Units (Satkers) that reduced the immediate impacts, and in some cases increased frustration among community stakeholders in receiving assistance. Continuity is essential in the implementing agency and management unit throughout the duration of a project, and would have allowed more effective and efficient implementation. Heavy reliance on the consultants due to the frequent changes in project management arrangements and staff required additional effort and resources. Flexibility exhibited by both ADB and consultants during replanning exercises and contract variations contributed significantly to continuity.
71. The extremely large and complex nature of the earthquake and tsunami disaster, combined with an equally large number of donors, NGOs and government agencies operating also necessitated active coordination and dialogue at all levels, and regular review and modification of plans, adding a further layer of complexity to implementation.
72. The detailed design of the fisheries component was largely conducted from a sectoral perspective. This approach posed challenges in working with some communities, where there were multi sectoral not only sectoral needs. In this regard ETESP, being multi-sectoral project, offered obvious advantages in treading this difficult terrain, but in practice implementation of a more multi-sectoral approach at community level proved difficult and was not achieved.
73. Criteria for selecting beneficiaries and their proposed activities continued to be developed, Needless to say many difficulties were encountered, and indeed complex, in determining the beneficiaries and the activities they were to be associated with. Perhaps, it is now evident that whilst giving a lead in determining the selection of the beneficiaries and the proposed activities thereof, are best to be determined by the respective communities
Implementation procedures
74. Implementation procedures built on both ADB and GoI procedures, but deficiencies and draw backs were noted:
• inadequate delegation of procurement powers to consultants and IA and the permitted limits were too low - mainly concerns need to refer any expenditure by consultants >US$500 to PMO/EMS for authorisation - ridiculously low limit
• the eligibility checking that was introduced had minimal impact as the checks were delayed and were not able to contribute to management efficacy
• the delegated authority to decentralization to District level, encouraged and supported by ETESP, could not be effectively implemented due to other limited budgetting and staff capacity at District level, as well as inability to coordinate effectively with DKP Provincial and MMAF due placing of District DKP under Bupati (district government) control, and as such was ineffective
• There were often incompatible bureaucratic processes between ADB and GoI, particularly audit punitive actions, which were counter productive to smooth implementation
• increasing delegation of authority from ADB Manila to EMS during the lifetime of ETESP had noticeable, incremental advantages for implementation
29
Finance and financial management
75. Finance for component implementation flowed through the GOI on-budget procedures, involving an annual DIPA, which frequently required adjustments during the year to adapt to changing circumstances. Implementation through on-budget procedures added to implementation delays, although these were reduced with time and experience. More emphasis was given to off-budget financing for some activities during the latter part of the project, through the consultant contract, which proved quicker and more efficient in providing training, small infrastructure improvements and other items disbursed through community contracts. Careful consideration needs to be given to a mix of on- and off budgets in such emergency projects in future, perhaps with more emphasis on off-budget financing.
76. Community contracting was widely regarded as successful but required extensive documentation for processing according to GOI procedures. This was made further difficult by non-conforming rural communities. Reporting on community contracts was considered excessive, and a better focus on outputs (achievements) would have been preferred to rather than a detailed accounting of items purchased and so forth.
77. Auditing by BRR was often delayed and negative in approach seeking error, fault and blame; but not proactive in giving real time advice on improving procedures and implementation. Multiple audit systems active during ETESP Fisheries, involving both BRR and ADB procedures, which proved cumbersome and a streamlining of procedures early on could have improved effectiveness and efficiency.
78. Budget available to the ETESP Fisheries component was also subject to much discussion and some changes which caused difficulties in planning. Whilst some flexibility in allocation in an emergency project is useful, such reallocations need to be done carefully, to avoid disrupting implementation, and diversion of project management staff from more important tasks.
Communications
79. Communication at all levels was an essential part of implementation of ETESP Fisheries, and received investment in time and resources by BRR, ADB and consultants. Communication tools were used to inform stakeholders of the purpose and activities of ETESP Fisheries, allow complaints, and share experiences. As a large project in the fisheries sector, the component also received its share of positive and negative publicity from local and international press, and time was devoted by BRR, ADB and the consultants in addressing various issues that emerged. In hindsight, more emphasis should have been given towards development of the communications strategy during early implementation, and keeping the public informed of progress pro-actively through local press including radio and television.
80. Communication of technical information through manuals, bulletins, posters, websites and word of mouth was well received by the coastal public and appreciated by the rural producer level despite high adult illiteracy rates; high visual impact content is necessary; the information service should be a key function of any recovery or development project.
30
81. The complaints mechanism developed by ADB and BRR served a useful purpose in addressing complaints but there was some overlap between communication channels at times. Most successful resolution occurred when there was a focus on local resolution of a problem; care needed not to use conflict for publicity or political gain or social research purposes. Sensitive and skilled approaches are necessary, particularly given the history of conflict and natural disaster in Acehnese coastal communities, as investigations conducted also risked reopening or fuelling divisions within society.
Monitoring, supervision and reporting
82. Reporting was conducted at various levels in accordance with ADB and GOI procedures. For community contracts, reporting requirements were excessive, overlapping and shifting; overly focused on accounting for inputs/not sufficiently focused on outputs; exacerbated by multi-level, micro-management. Simpler procedures would have been more effective in facilitating the delivery of community contracts, and would also have enabled gaining a higher degree of communal appreciation and acceptance.
83. Supervising consultants were particularly needed to control the quality of boats and infrastructure delivered by contractors and sub-contractors although it is recognized that this could place very difficult responsibilities on the consultant. The poor quality of supervision consultants, hired on-budget through the DIPA, led to increasing emphasis on monitoring by consultants. In hindsight, a separate supervision consultant should have been employed off-budget (as in the ETESP Housing component), although careful coordination with the implementation consultants would have been necessary.
Policy and institutions
84. ETESP Fisheries began in a policy and institutional, near vacuum which was only partially filled later by the shifting and often late decision making of the second IA, BRR and a recently elected provincial and local government. On the other hand, this is not surprising bearing in mind the enormity of the disaster and the political mileu that existed in Aceh.
85. It is often acknowledged that the general national decentralization policy in Indonesia still appears opaque and limited to an administrative and political exercise, and is yet to be backed by efficient transfer of resources, i.e., the human skills or finance to district level or reorganization of the functions of the former centralized civil service system. Nor do the District level governments appear capable of efficiently using increased resources at present.
86. It is the considered view that the Provincial and District Governments in NAD are still not fully prepared to deal with development planning and transmission of the considerable national source funds potentially available for development in Aceh, more so in an emergency and or in response to a “disaster” situation .
87. The project had to contend with initial low levels of trust between all stakeholders (especially between government and public after prolonged conflict and political instability) and was reflected by the volume of paperwork created to bridge the accountability and governance gap. The consultants were of the view that many donors condoned or even encouraged this state of affairs by proliferation and induction of their own procedures. Bureaucracy is second only to corruption as a prime factor in inefficiency of delivering aid and its remedy is so far largely overlooked.
31
88. Sustainable management of the fisheries and aquaculture sector in future will require considerable institutional and policy development. The management of some assets provided by ADB ETESP Fisheries, as well as other donors, during the emergency phase, requires effective management institutions, which are not widely available. Some progress was made in the latter part of ETESP Fisheries in supporting local farmer and fisher-owned institutions through the livelihood center initiatives, but further development of such institutions in future will be necessary.
ETESP-Fisheries Subcomponents
89. Below we consider the more specific lessons relating to design and implementation of each of the six sub-components of ETESP-Fisheries. In general, the design of the component into six distinct, but linked, sub-components was a useful and a pragmatic approach. However, care was needed in implementation to ensure coordination. The spreading out of sub-components over wide geographical areas of Aceh and Nias increased the impact of ETESP Fisheries, but the question remains of whether a more geographically limited focus including all sub-components in an integrated way would have been more effective in rebuilding livelihoods. Although one could be wise in hindsight, such an approach on the other hand, would have left out communities that needed rehabilitation and support, and would not have been welcomed by the community at large.
SC1 Community Empowerment
90. The community empowerment sub-component was widely recognized as an effective method of delivering substantial assistance through small grants to coastal communities based more precisely on the needs of the communities. More than 17,862 people in coastal villages across Aceh and Nias benefited directly from financial assistance and capacity building for rebuilding of small-scale community infrastructure, household and group assets and other items necessary to rebuild livelihoods. The approach was effective, but there are also some lessons learned on its application:
i. Contracting of communities through small grants proved more successful for achieving rehabilitation of community assets than use of “outside” contractors. External contractors were not well received by many communities, whereas the community contracting process allowed requirements to be based on community needs with much stronger ownership when communities were more directly involved in planning and implementation. The approach however, required significant investment in time and people to provide the support necessary for planning, implementation and reporting of the community grants.
ii. Trained facilitators assisted communities to plan and monitor community grants (hired through an NGO, or NACA consultants), but such facilitators (Bina Swadaya NGO, SA, DIU) needed thorough orientation and training in their functions and understanding of livelihoods approaches before starting. More extensive training, and pre-selection to eliminate embedded “technical” or “top down” approach would have been useful. Other key points are (a) community facilitation must be done by persons respected and trusted by the community; respect and trust take time to earn but trust is a greater guarantee of success than any piece of paper; (b) care must be taken to
32
approach the rehabilitation work as development with the community, not to or for the community; and (c) a stronger emphasis on developing strengths and opportunities, rather than the tendency to focus on needs and issues, which pervades thought and discussion at all levels in Aceh and Nias.
iii. ETESP-Fisheries was formulated as a sectoral project. Inevitably during community consultations this led to sectoral group selection which left dissatisfaction amongst non-beneficiaries in some communities. The community approach and development impact could have been strengthened through a more integrated multi-sectoral approach.
iv. Womens’ groups showed themselves to be effective developers of post-harvest fisheries and small business opportunities. The tsunami also had differential impacts on women and children and therefore, a gender sensitive approach to community facilitation was essential.
v. In a situation such as in Aceh, where a good proportion of varyingly skilled personnel was lost to the community during the disaster, the importance of training in getting back the communities on feet cannot and should not be under estimated. Training, however, has many facets, and in order to be effective and efficient has to be approached in a considered manner, that relates to the different community groups and the other recipients. Equally, training is not an all or none process; it is a continuing process, especially in respect of communities such as jn Aceh and has to be ongoing until communities are sufficiently empowered.
SC2 Capture Fisheries
91. The sub-component for restoration of capture fisheries was oriented towards repair and restoration of boats, fishing gear, some financial assistance with initial operations and training support. The sub-component was successful in providing fishers with assistance to resume fishing, but again several lesson’s were apparent:
i. Design and future ownership issues should be discussed with beneficiaries at the earliest stage to prevent later discontent. Fisher groups in Aceh and Nias were very conservative about local boat design; this aspect was often used as an excuse to open complaints and “compensation” arguments with contractors. The need for a participatory process throughout is evident.
ii. Complex tendering processes used by GoI (bidders were required to provide 19 different documents to support each bid) led to most contracts via larger businesses, mostly non-boat builder contractors who sub-contracted to boatyards. Few, if any, Acehnese or Nias boatyards were able to cope with the bureaucracy of tendering. This approach was inefficient and only increased the cost of the boats and decreased reliability of delivery.
33
SC3 Aquaculture
92. The sub-component was successful in restoring aquaculture and providing new livelihood opportunities through aquaculture in Aceh and Nias, but again several lesson’s were apparent:
i. The design aquaculture sub-component as far as possible implemented a “whole village” approach to aquaculture rehabilitation. This was arguably more equitable and effective in rebuilding the sector than focusing on individual farmers, or smaller geographical units. Even so, selection of beneficiaries and their proposed activities was complex, and procedures continued to be developed. Verification of beneficiary lists was to ensure that benefits are for the intended target beneficiaries. Verification of groups plan, site selection, and environmental checking are also critical to improve success rate. These assessments helped support better implementation and successfully increased group active participation and livelihoods productivities. Approach to design was strongly guided by environmental criteria established early in ETESP Fisheries through consultation among a wide range of development actors and NGOs in Aceh (“Better Management Practices” manual).
ii. The “build back better” principle for aquaculture was constrained for tambaks and canals due to local land ownership issues affecting redesign of layout and routing of canals.
iii. Some social (conflict of interest) and technical (poor re-construction of ponds) problems in the execution of rehabilitation the external contracts during 2006 led to more emphasis on community contracting in subsequent years. Direct contracting of farmer groups through community contracts proved more successful for achieving rehabilitation of ponds (tambaks) and organizing agro inputs than use of contractors. However, investment in technical assistance was necessary in participatory planning and design and implementation to retain quality of construction.
iv. Group Dynamics and Transparency. Social properties of aqua-farmers in Aceh are characterized by few active lead farmers, whilst most remaining farmers are passive and not well educated. The situation occasionally leads to non-transparent project administration and attempts to capture the benefits by a limited number of farmers. To ensure active participation and transparency amongst group members, intensified meetings with village groups before and after fund disbursements in particular were required through active facilitations by field facilitators are useful to encourage community awareness in project administration and implementation.
v. Input Quality. Input quality is the key to successful aquaculture, and poor quality shrimp seed has been a source of risk and disease problems in Aceh for several years. This situation required additional investment in technical assistance to raise awareness of selecting good quality seed, supporting communities to prepare good planning documents, linking communities to quality suppliers, and hands-on training
34
in better management. Contracting systems were developed to procure only quality seed through a special contract between farmers and hatcheries, comprising critical components such as disease testing and fitness of post larvae. Some issues concerning legal, quality wood for water gate also emerged, which required attention on certification from forestry department.
vi. Time Frame. Pond rehabilitation activities required more time than anticipated to achieve full completion due to climatic conditions. Delays in project start up at some areas caused execution to occur during rainy seasons. Implementation plans therefore need to be carefully developed to relate to seasonality of production to prevent delays.
vii. Monitoring. Monitoring of community project implementation should focus on farm/facilities design and layout and BMP implementations, as well as group organization. Technical monitoring is highly required from the beginning of project implementation to ensure farmers follow their agreed plan and technical guidelines.
viii. Technical constraints to brackishwater aquaculture. Since brackishwater farming had significant technical constraints before the tsunami its rehabilitation will take more time, capacity building, research and development than the span of ETESP has offered; hopefully some continued technical assistance will be provided to producers by the AACC/ALSC initiative and the informal aquaculture network between donors and MMAF/DKP.
ix. Critical mass for marketing. Due to low productivity of local aquaculture practices from many individual farmers, coordinated collective production is critical to achieve viable volumes of product for export, and to capture the economic growth opportunities possible through access to better markets for shrimp. This situation, common throughout Indonesia, again emphasizes the importance of better sector organization and institutional development.
SC4 Infrastructure
93. The sub-component was successful in restoring or improving various infrastructure in support of fisheries and aquaculture. This sub-component proved complex to implement and again several lesson’s were apparent:
i. Assessment: There must be careful selection of owners and managers of infrastructure involving assessment of their past business performance before construction starts, especially so in the case of productive assets such as ice plants and hatcheries.
ii. Contracting: BRR and Satker preferred tendering to local contractors but many of these had insufficient skills base or cash flow; indeed many appear not to have basic
35
business skills. Tendering processes select those who can fill forms not those who can construct. Consultant participation and supervision of selection of the tendering process is necessary but is not permitted under GoI regulations – this needs change. Skilled labour was already at a premium in neighbouring Sumatera Utara (Medan) where a building boom was underway and skilled migrant labour felt less threatened. This made it difficult for local contractors to source skilled tradesmen for post-tsunami reconstruction.
iii. Ownership and management of assets –Public-private partnership in running and maintenance of ice plants proved to be a useful model for sustaining infrastructure beyond the duration of the project
SC5 Coastal Environment
94. The sub-component for coastal environment assisted communities to replant coastal vegetation lost during the tsunami, and to help improve the coastal environment. The assistance was initially through tendered contracts, and then through community grants, as in the case of aquaculture a more successful approach. There was a close link to particularly the aquaculture sub-component, with the objective of improving environmental conditions in aquaculture areas, many of which had suffered from years of loss of mangroves. The sub-component successfully supported communities to replant trees, but also provided important lesson’s in the rehabilitation of coastal environments that are relevant for future improvement in coastal environment, and their management:
i. Assessments: Many donors/NGOs rushed to plant mangroves for the greater environmental good, often without forestry skills, but neglected to inform and raise awareness in coastal communities of the need to care for the young trees. Community awareness and after-care support is important and was included in the ETESP Fisheries component activities.
ii. Implementation team: ETESP Fisheries learnt an early lesson that it is necessary to have a forestry expert with specialist knowledge in mangroves to have success in survival of planted mangroves; under skilled guidance a range of species were planted compatible with soil type, tidal range and other local ecological factors.
iii. Creating community ownership and awareness: Another early lesson learned, is that it is necessary that the sense of ownership of mangroves is created amongst the community before planting starts; otherwise the planting is done for the wages only and there is no after care. Awareness raising campaigns can be effective if carried out on a wide scale and there is regular follow up action to maintain the motivation generated.
iv. Biodiversity: Mangrove plantations were created and vegetation restored/replaced
36
but natural multi-species coastal forest was not replaced (it may not have existed in those locations pre-tsunami anyway). Since Sumatera has long been plantation oriented this would not seem amiss to many.
v. Ongoing management: As mangrove planting has created many coastal/estuarine plantations; these should be managed as community plantations with cutting and replanting schemes.
95. Environmental impact of shrimp ponds has been much publicized; in the case of ETESP Fisheries it has been mitigated with an intensive mangrove planting in and around tambaks. It is possible to contribute to marine environmental aims indirectly, e.g, ETESP Fisheries has rebuilt two previously non-functional, marine fish hatcheries (BBIP Nias and Simeulue) and trained staff to produce millions of grouper eggs and fry thereby reducing pressure on the fish populations of surrounding reefs whilst laying the foundations of a profitable industry in those economically disadvantaged islands.
SC6 Institutional Support
96. This sub-component was a “catch all” to assist in various ways with rebuilding of institutions in Aceh and Nias, and in supporting the management of ETESP Fisheries. Many institutional support activities were also provided during the assessments and implementation of Sub-components 1-5, and have been reported above. Implementation of ETESP-Fisheries was constrained by the lack of functional management institutions within government and communities, and the component invested significantly in supporting capacity building throughout the four years of implementation. Further development of the institutions in Aceh and Nias will be essential for future development of the sector. A number of lesson’s emerged from this sub-component, that are highlighted below, and which are important for future implementation of emergency projects, and more generally for future management of the development of the fisheries and aquaculture sector in Aceh and Nias. A special analysis is also provided of the training activities assisted by ETESP-Fisheries through on and off-budget.
97. Recognising the importance of the need for training and capacity building, ETESP-Fisheries increasingly gave attention to investment in training and various capacity building initiatives, through on and off-budget mechanisms. The latter part of ETESP-Fisheries in particular used off-budget mechanisms for funding training, in part to avoid the long contracting procedures etc. The following lessons are provided:
i. Conventional in-class training that usually uses a theoretical approach is not recommended for farmers who generally have a low level of education and literacy. Unfortunately, this method was usually attempted by the Satker in community training particularly when funded and implemented on-budget (DIPA). On site, practical, hands-on training approach has revealed better impacts in improving farmers’ skills and knowledge. However, this approach requires more human and financial resources, as well as time. On-site, hands-on training was more effective than workshops or training at centralized training institutions.
37
ii. Distribution of technical training materials is highly appreciated at producer group level.
iii. There remains a considerable need for adult education and literacy campaigns throughout the province to underpin bringing knowledge to the rural communities.
iv. Community capacity building needs a personal approach from the trainer (trainer or facilitator charisma). The success of this activity is strongly related to the trainer’s/facilitator’s interpersonal skills; they should be passionate and be able to blend with local culture.
v. Community capacity building is a slow long term process; it deals with changing communities’ attitudes. Thus, in designing capacity building for communities, the program it should consider how it would leave behind as many successful people as possible who could demonstrate advantages/improvements from designed activity. Communities will be intent to follow successful people. Thus, community building is recommended at least to focus on a few people/groups that could later expected be able to create the “snow ball” phenomena in their surroundings. A huge number of first participants is therefore not necessarily the main target for achievement in a capacity building program.
vi. Community development should emphasis community participation, encourage the community to be involved in planning, preparing and organizing the activities without any “financial motivation” to participate from the organization, thereby raising the sense of belonging and understand of benefits from the program.
Community livelihood support initiatives
98. Following a review of ETESP livelihoods activities during the first quarter of 2008, which emphasized the importance of community livelihood support services, three new initiatives were incorporated into ETESP-Fisheries, two to support more directly communities in better management of aquaculture and fisheries, and one to replace traditional fishers knowledge lost during the tsunami. These were implemented through a mix of on- and off-budget procedures. The outcomes from these three activities provided important lessons and a future direction for aquaculture and fisheries management in Aceh in particular, but are of wider interest throughout Indonesia. The results were presented to a special meeting hosted by MMAF in Jakarta on 25 June 2009 to discuss their wider significance. The lessons learned are provided below.
Aquaculture - ALSC & AACC
99. Aquaculture Livelihood Service Centres (ALSCs) are fish/shrimp farmer owned, operated and managed centres for participatory organization designed to be catalyst and drivers for aquaculture sector development in Aceh initially by providing technical advice and information to small farmers in the whole cycle from the seed selection, farming to harvesting
38
and marketing. An Aceh Aquaculture Communication Centre (AACC) was established, at the BBAP, Ujung Batee, with the assistance and support of ETESP-fisheries during January to June 2009. The concept of AACC was to provide a supporting service structure for the Aquaculture Livelihood Service Centres (ALSC) and more generally to improve access to farmers in Aceh of technical, disease diagnosis and training services. This initiative was undertaken late in the component, but provided positive and important lessons for future institutional development:
i. ALSCs should be farmer owned producer associations and located in a building owned by the community and not by government.
ii. All the committee members should be from the aqua farmer community and not government organization. This emphasizes farmer ownership, but also avoids problems such as transfer of government staff, and conflicts of interest.
iii. Formation of a legal entity is important for the future of the ALSCs and its further business development in collaboration with stake holders for improving the pond production and profit, as well as and also attaining the targeted goal of shrimp/fish in regular exportable quantities with a good quality product thereby obtaining higher prices which can improve the livelihoods of the aqua farmer community.
iv. Unfortunately, the options for producer associations in Indonesia to form legal entities are still very restricted. The opportunity exists for positive policy and institutional change at central and local level in this respect to assist development of more livelihood oriented institutions and development processes.
v. The careful planning of the establishment of AACC at BBAP is a practical and sustainable approach because principles of AACC are in line with that BBAP mandate, i.e. provision of services to Aceh aquaculture farmers for improving their livelihoods. However, careful considerations and approaches have been necessary to ensure that ALSC will be fully farmer oriented without them being controlled or over influenced by AACC in their decision making.
vi. Whilst it is important for AACC to be proactive and dynamic in providing a variety of services they should however remain one of ALSC’s several options for obtaining services. Government and external agencies are only for advice and information on technological advances and possibly services, if available, but not financial support. If the committee members are from the government departments, restructuring of government organization will also affect the ALSC operations.
Capture Fisheries – CF-LSC
100. Capture fisheries Livelihood Service Centres were established around 8 of the existing Panglima Laot Lhok organizations. Livelihood Service Centres for Capture Fisheries (LSC-CF) invested in building the capacity of the Panglima Laot Lhok organizations in
39
strategic fish-landing locations on each of the East and West coasts of NAD. The activities of the LSC-CF during ETESP Fisheries duration focused on the strengthening of community groups through improving human and social capital to receive assets, but again many important lessons are apparent for future development of fisher oriented institutions in Aceh:
i. Both renewal and replacement (modernization) of a wide range of fisher skills and knowledge has been necessary through intensive technical training programmes at local level. However, centrally directed training institutions in NAD appear poorly oriented to carry out these training functions at present due perhaps to a curriculum based system whilst traditional organizations such as Panglima Laot have fishers’ commitments to undertake. Reform of training and educational services will be necessary.
ii. Multiple challenges were faced from administrative management of BRR RDKK contracts, GoI procurement processing, technical equipment acquisition, delivery, installation and training at eight different site locations. Fisher associations cannot process this complicated bureaucracy on their own. Time was immediately an issue and considerable amount of preparatory work prior to receipt of official approval was critical to the eventual successful execution of contracts and procurement packages.
iii. Accurate identification of detailed equipment specifications by NACA consultants prior to engaging with BRR’s bidding and procurement process was extremely helpful. NACA consultants supplied BRR Satker with detailed pictures, specifications, prices, distributors, etc., which hastened the lengthy procurement process. In many cases, BRR did not have the correct specifications of technical equipment needed to support programmatic goals. Attention to such detail at the front end will save considerable time and confusion once the process has been initiated.
iv. Community contracts to refurbish existing facilities also presented scheduling issues as administrative delays in funding were more the rule than the exception for each of the eight individual site contracts. Facilitating the development of clear work plans and detailed budgets in advance of funding helped move the work along once funds were accessible. The superfluous requirement to secure multiple local authority signatures added significant time delays in completing the contracts. Better socialization with these officials early on in the program would reduce the contract processing time.
v. Strong relationships with each of the Panglima Laot Officials contributed to the programmatic success of establishing active service centers once refurbishment contracts and equipment procurement processes were completed. It was important to recognize from the start that each of the lhok officials are non-salaried positions and that their responsibility to their member fisher groups, along with their need to manage and operate the newly established service center, competed with their need to earn a livable wage to support their family.
40
vi. From the start of the LSC-CF inititiative, Livelihood Service Center Facilitators were supported with a daily wage contract at each site to ensure work detail was followed up and to allow Panglima Laot officials to continue earning a living. These locally developed resources will continue to be essential assets to the Panglima Laot and continued support has been assured by the OISCA/JFPR project during 2009. However, eventually the Panglima Laot or fishers association must find the way to fund the organization themselves. In this respect, wage substitution by donors is a policy risk acting against commitment and self-sustainability.
vii. The original vision of CF-LSC being services run by self-supporting producer associations should not be forgotten and external support especially financial needs to be tapered away so as not to create prolonged dependence. Sustainability is the aim not just continuity.
viii. The Facilitators should remain responsible for the continued maintenance of the LSC IT systems, radio communications and the positive inventory control of all LSC office equipment. The medium and high skill level LSC Facilitators should continue to be developed in a TOT model to serve as a local resource for further training at the Centers. Training activities generated in and around the Centers will further assure the sustainability of the models, systems and processes put in place.
ix. Additional linkages to related small business, supply chain, and expanded markets can and should be developed. There remains the opportunity for each Panglima Laot to develop their own revenue generating activities to support the continued operation of their Center. A minimum salary for the Panglima Laot at the lhok level paid by income of the association would afford them greater time to devote to the leadership and direct management of the many needs throughout their respective estuary.
x. The Livelihoods Service Centres have the basis to become self-funding and self-sufficient in the medium to long term and technical assistance should be geared so as not to increase dependency on donor project assistance or GoI. Appropriate relationships based on an understanding of culture and traditional business practices remain critical. New partnerships forged must be mutually beneficial in an equal “give and take” partnership for the long-term success of the LSCs.
xi. The Panglima Laot is now in a position of strength and need only recognize this and posture themselves accordingly. Requests for data, work detail or facility use from outside organizations should be responded to with counter requests for wage payments or in-kind services that clearly benefit the Panglima Laot, their member fisher groups or their Livelihood Center.
41
Community based bathymetric mapping (“sonar mapping”)
101. After the decimating effects of manmade and natural disaster such as conflict and tsunami, the community based bathymetric mapping initiative supported off-budget by ETESP Fisheries has shown that it is possible to restore lost knowledge, to reintroduce, to modernise and to improve fisher skills as part of the rehabilitation of livelihoods process. The success of this initiative provides also important lessons in terms of approach and for future development of the capture fisheries sector in Aceh:
i. Carefully investigation and understanding of the long-standing social structures and behaviors within the community was an important part of the success. This required identification of those charismatic leaders within the communities. Bureaucratically appointed leaders may not be those with the power to implement programs successfully within the communities.
ii. As an “outsider” continue to add to and refine knowledge about the interactions in the society being observed and advised (it seems like about every month or so, another door would open and one would get a peek at some previously hidden aspect of the society).
iii. The successful facilitator will integrate them self within the community to the point where they are no longer perceived as a visitor (until pretense falls away). A process approach which continues to look for other social leaders, expanding geographically as well as in related industries (fish trading, boat building, etc,) is essential.
iv. The knowledge gained should be used to develop market-driven strategies, design programs where there are clearly understood benefits, or conversely, a clear loss of opportunity (and materials) as a consequence of non-participation. Develop reward and enforcement mechanisms consistent with the social framework.
v. It is possible to assist top down organizations with feudal origins, in this case the Panglima Laot, in their process of change towards becoming democratic organizations which can then provide and manage services for producer (fisher) associations.
vi. An approach to fisheries resource co-management is to first engage fishers and their leaders in technical matters which interest them – this must be done by empathetic and technically skilled facilitators who prove that the co-management is to the benefit not detriment of fishers’ livelihoods.
vii. With commercially available and inexpensive technology it is possible to engage fisher associations in surveys and research which they understand, quickly adopt and can use as the basis for improvement of their organizations and co-management with GoI establishment/authorities.
42
V. Recommendations
A. General
102. Recommendations are mostly covered in the extensive lessons learnt section previously.
103. The innovative livelihoods approaches spawned by ETESP should be followed up and expanded without over-riding the original concepts and approaches of producer association ownership to suit government or external donor agendas or convenience.
104. The experiences with Sonar Mapping/CF-LSC and AACC/ALSC demonstrate that there is enormous potential for ADB to provide a type of “venture capital” allied to a combination of dynamic technical assistance and private sector, unfettered by from the cumbrances of dysfunctional government finance systems.
105. The ground work of ETESP Fisheries showed that there are other interesting avenues for coastal livelihoods development and investment in future.
B. Follow-up Actions
106. At the present time there is on-going consideration of how best to continue the ETESP fisheries livelihoods development activities on their path towards self-sustainability. There is a need for all involved to distinguish between continuity and sustainability and to envisage activities which would reduce donor and government dependence and increase self-reliance. Some may interpret this as more technical assistance, donor support and government run extension; some may see the need to use funds already available in principle to the government in NAD; some may see the need to encourage investment in producer associations, private sector services and marketing linkages; yet others see the need to solve the technical complexities of tackling the regulations and restrictions surrounding international trade in seafood products. There is no doubt that the approaches and systems introduced in the latter part of ETESP Fisheries are just a beginning and not yet self-sustaining, either financially or technically. Technical and financial support is still needed to provide vision, policy direction, ideas injection, skills training and organization.
107. At the present time NACA is considering moving forward in a consortium approach with other Aceh aquaculture network partners such as FAO, IFC, WFC, AusAid, JFPR, etc. to develop the innovative approaches developed by ETESP Fisheries and to alloy these with the approaches of the other organizations, as well as experience in other countries. Within the scope of these international agencies it is to be hoped that the present NAD governor’s keen interest in obtaining international scholarships for talented Acehnese people will be well fostered.
108. The way forward for the acclaimed Sonar Mapping and Capture Fisheries - Livelihoods Service Centres is by no means as clear though the Panglima Laot and Provincial government of Aceh have expressed interest in its continuity and expansion.
43
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT
LIST OF APPENDICES
No. TITLE 1 Component Logframe2 SPCR Summary sheet 3 Targets & KPI 4 Component Implementation Schedule 5 Key dates 6 Summary of Consulting Services 7 Equipment procured 7a ETESP Fisheries On Budget Proposed Assets Distribution (Eng/Ind) 7b ETESP Fisheries On Budget Proposed Assets Distribution (Eng/Ind) 7c ETESP Fisheries NACA off‐budget equipment inventory 7d Handover AACC & equipment procured by NACA 7e Return of equipment & furniture borrowed by NACA from BRR 8 Training 9 ETESP Fisheries Socio‐economic Survey 2008 ‐ Financial and
Economic Analysis of SC1, SC2, SC3 & SC4 10 Photo gallery 11 List of Publications 11b List of Publications by CBBS/Sonar Mapping11c List of Publications by CF‐LSC 12 Summary List of Community Contracts 13 (13a, 13b, 13c and 13d)
Summary of contracts and ineligible contracts
44
APPENDIX 1: DRAFT PROJECT FRAMEWORK
Component Framework in the Inception Report
Design Summary Performance Indicators/Targets
Monitoring Mechanisms
Assumptions
Impact: Contribution to revival of economy in Aceh and North Sumatra tsunami affected regions .
Fisheries production restored to 80% of pre-tsunami levels by 2010 Average fisheries household incomes above pre-disaster level by 2010 Private sector activities comprise main component of local fishery economy in affected areas by mid-2007
Provincial statistics and monitoring system [pre-tsunami baseline established] Project records
Communities and investors respond to opportunities. Unpredictable events do not distract from implementation of the disaster management rehabilitation and reconstruction strategy Government prepared to pass port and facility management to private sector
Outcome: Livelihoods and private economic activity in coastal areas, and essential fisheries public services and infrastructure, restored
Employment opportunities for one person in every household by end 2006
Provincial statistical sources Project performance monitoring system (PPMS)
Adequate and timely availability of funds and coordination of activities among stakeholders Increased confidence for investment in the fisheries sector in near future.
Outputs: 1. Coastal communities empowered to develop and manage their resources
Community groups for fisheries are developed and strengthened in at least 120 coastal villages by end 2007 Participatory planning for restoration and comanagement of natural resources completed by end 2006 Participatory opportunities, capability assessment and alternate livelihood planning completed by end 2006 In at least 120 coastal villages, social and human capital enhanced by end 2007
National statistics service reports Project PPMS
Fishers’ and fish farmers’ intend to return to previous livelihood activities Supply chain exists for equipment and inputs for fishing and fishpond operations
2. Capture fisheries restored to biologically and economically sustainable levels of effort and landings
Capture fisheries restored/ improved in 11 districts Vessels and equipment supplied Fleet management improved
Provincial & National fisheries statistics Direct monitoring
Government and communities prepared to introduce comanagement within supporting policy and technical framework Appropriate boat construction systems approved
45
3. Aquaculture facilities and production systems restored on a sustainable basis
Technical and environmental assessments completed by mid 2006 Rehabilitation of 3,000 ha of fish ponds/mariculture facilities completed by end 2007 Inputs provided and supply chains re-established for aquaculture farmers covering 3,000 ha of aquaculture by end 2007 Community based management systems established for rehabilitated aquaculture areas.
Direct monitoring Direct monitoring and reports from farmer groups Participatory monitoring via NGO
International price and demand for shrimp, seaweed and fish increases or stays stable No major disease outbreaks. No further large scale environmental disaster Entrepreneurial investment favours community based management
4. Small-scale fisheries landing and post-harvest facilities restored
Landing, fuelling, storage, processing and marketing facilities at 18 landing sites restored/improved and other small scale post-harvest facilities completed by end 2007 Port site and processing plant hygiene improved (Government post-harvest quality control systems re-established)
Direct monitoring of delivery and function by PMU Direct monitoring of delivery and function by PMU Reports from Provincial Fisheries Office
Management skills existing or introduced to communities Awareness of public hygiene issues and food safety increased Fee (levy) system to cover costs supported by industry
5. Coastal environment rehabilitated and properly managed for sustainable use
Rehabilitation of 600 hectares of mangroves [perhaps] rehabilitation of 20 ha of coral reef Coral reef and mangrove areas under community management (eg, elimination of blasting) Establishment of the marine and fisheries monitoring, control and surveillance system
Participatory monitoring via NGO Participatory monitoring via NGO Participatory monitoring via NGO and reporting from Fisheries Office
Subject to review by environment specialist and spatial planners Mangroves not adequately covered by other agencies eg. remit of Forestry Dept Community based system can be applied
6. Provincial and district/ subdistrict fisheries and extension services re-established/ strengthened
Damaged infrastructure is restored and lost equipment is replaced in all affected Districts by end 2007 Necessary equipment needs provided by end 2006 400 persons trained in participatory extension methodologies, and technical aspects
Procurement documentation Reports from District Fisheries Offices plus direct monitoring Workshop records and PMU progress reports
Equipment provided is durable under operating conditions Supporting policy and institutional framework supporting fisheries participatory extension is developed
46
Milestones Board Approval I April 2005 Grant effectiveness April 2005 Start of Consultant services September 2005 Project Completion mid-2008
Inputs: Grant for fisheries sector rehabilitation totalling $30.0 million as part of $290.0 for ETESP from the Asian Tsunami Fund Government contribution of taxes equivalent to $3.3 Million
47
SubProject Completion Report Summary
Aceh Barat
Subcomponent
Units SPPR Target Achievement Total Cost
2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil
1. Community Development
Community grants villages 6 12 18 6 12 0 18 3365
2. Fishing Vessels
5GT Boats boats 26 26 26 3440
10 GT Boats 8 8 1862
3. Aquaculture
Fish cage package 2 2 4 4 1076
Brackishwater fish/shrimp pond rehabilitation
ha 0 45.26 45.3 1160
Livelihood activitiesa/ package 20 20 2 1 3 146
4. Fisheries Infrastructure
Fuel station including jetty no 1 1 1 1 626
PPI no 1 1 1 1 738
Port facilities package 2 2 1 1 436
TPI Meurebo no 0 1 1 387
5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 0 25 25 194
6. Service Recovery
Offices refurbished
Total cost 9186
a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab
Other Information
Capacity Building
Training course held 11
Persons trained 372
Equipment provided
Vehicles
Motorbikes
Computers
48
SubProject Completion Report Summary
Aceh Jaya
Subcomponent Units SPPR Target Achievement Total
Cost
2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil
1. Community Development
Community grants villages 10 10 20 12 8 1 21 4196
2. Fishing Vessels
5 GT gillnetter/hook & liners units 24 24 36 36 4715
3. Aquaculture
Brackishwater fish/shrimp pond rehabilitation ha
52 52 0
Livelihood activitiesa/ cages 20 20 5 5 330
Hatchery rehabilitation no 1 1 1 1 150
4. Fisheries Infrastructure
Fuel station no 0 1 1 308
PPI no
3 3 2 2 2798
Fish markets no 0 1 1 299
Transportation for ice distribution in Aceh Jaya no
0 1 1 529
5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 20 20 0
6. Service Recovery
DPPP office refurbishment 1 0
Equipment and furniture for BPP offices 1 1 1 243
Total cost 13088
a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab
Other Information
Capacity Building
Training course held 10
Persons trained 419
Equipment provided
Vehicles
Motorbikes
Computers
49
SubProject Completion Report Summary
Aceh Utara
Units SPPR Target Achievement Total
Cost
Subcomponent 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil
1. Community Development
Community grants villages 10 10 9 11 4 24 4047
2. Fishing Vessels Purse seiners boats 6 6 4 4 8 4491
Fishing lamps lights 200 200 200 200 215
Brackishwater fish/shrimp pond rehabilitation
ha 550 550 452.6 603.1 1056 18168
Livelihood activitiesa/ package 90 90 10 4 3 17 516
Hatchery rehabilitation no 6 6 3 17 20 1649
4. Fisheries Infrastructure Fuel station no 1 1 1 1 372
PPI mini no 0 1 1 928
Revetment Muara Batu 1 stage 1 1 932
Revetment Muara Batu 2 stage 1 1 679
Civil works for iceplant 10t/day no 0 1 1 353
Machine of iceplant 10t/day no 0 1 1 1544
Tambak hut 6 6 256
5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 140 140 56 52.4 50 158 1282
6. Service Recovery
Offices refurbished
Total cost 15099
a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab
Other Information
Capacity Building
Training course held 14
Persons trained 758
Equipment provided
Vehicles
Motorbikes
Computers
50
SubProject Completion Report Summary
Banda Aceh
Subcomponent Units SPPR Target Achievement Total
Cost
2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil
1. Community Development
Community grants villages 11 11 8 2 0 10 1931
2. Fishing Vessels
3. Aquaculture
Brackishwater fish/shrimp pond rehabilitation ha
80 80 0
Livelihood activitiesa/ cages 0 2 2 150
0 0
4. Fisheries Infrastructure 0 0
Construction of Packing Sheds no 9 9 10 10 900
Ulee Lheue deep well no 1 1 198 Tambak pondok no 5 5 212
5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 20 20 0
6. Service Recovery
Province DKP Offices refurbished 1 1 1 1 180
Banda Aceh DKP office 1 1 625
Minor eqiupments for DKP office 1 0
Total cost 4045
a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab
Other Information
Capacity Building
Training course held 37
Persons trained 1093
Equipment provided
Vehicles
Motorbikes
Computers
51
SubProject Completion Report Summary Bireuen
Subcomponent Units SPPR Target Achievement Total
Cost
200
5 200
6 200
7 200
8 Tot
al 200
5 200
6 200
7 2008 Tot
al Rp mil 1. Community Development
Community grants villages 20 10 30 20 11 5 36 6660
2. Fishing Vessels
Purse seiners 20GT boats 3 3 3 3 2394
3. Aquaculture
Brackishwater fish/shrimp pond rehabilitation
ha 400 400 464 464 7704
Livelihood activitiesa/ cages 30 30 44 3 47 280
Hatchery rehabilitation no 8 8 12 12 1799
4. Fisheries Infrastructure
PPI no 2 2 1 1 2 3016
Jetty no 1 1 1 1 665
Tambak hut no 0 5 5 220
Access road PPI Plimbang no 0 1 1 292
5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 80 80 111.3 111 425
6. Service Recovery
Minor equipment for BPP office
packag
e 1 1 0
Minor monitoring equipment
packag
e 1 1 0
Offices refurbished
Total cost 13672
a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab
Other Information
Capacity Building
Training course held 14 Persons trained 903
Equipment provided Vehicles Motorbikes
Computers
52
SubProject Completion Report Summary Lhokseumawe
Subcomponent Units SPPR Target Achievement Total
Cost
2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil 1. Community Development Community grants villages 14 14 9 5 3 17 2842
2. Fishing Vessels
Purse seiners 20 GT boats 3 3 3 3 2441
3. Aquaculture
Brackishwater fish/shrimp pond rehabilitation
ha 50 50 84.53 84.5 1074
Livelihood activitiesa/
packages 0 3 1 4 170
Hatchery rehabilitation no 3 3 3 3 300
4. Fisheries Infrastructure
PPI no 1 1 1 1 900
Operational SPDN 1 1 100
5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 20 20 86 86 116
6. Service Recovery
DKP Offices construction 1 1 1 1 353
Total cost 6751
a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab
Other Information
Capacity Building Training course held 12 Persons trained 1042
Equipment provided
Vehicles Motorbikes
Computers
53
SubProject Completion Report Summary
Simeulue
Subcomponent Units SPPR Target Achievement Total
Cost
2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil
1. Community Development
Community grants villages 10 10 20 8 22 30 5992
2. Fishing Vessels
Vessel construction (2.5-3.5GT) lights 30 30 23 23 2988
3. Aquaculture
Marine cage Units 20 20 7 20 1 28 1700
4. Fisheries Infrastructure
Fuel stores/depots no 3 3 3 3 425
PPI Latak Ayah no 1 1 1 1 1212
PPI Labuhan Bajau 1 1 1 1449
PPI Suka Karya 1 1 1 1 1449
Fish markets no 1 1 1 1 378
Civil work of Ice Plant 10t/day no 0 1 1 480
Machine of Ice Plant 10t/day no 0 1 1 1345
5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 10 10 10 10 62
6. Service Recovery
Support to recovery of BBIP Mariculture Center
1
Total cost 15778
a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab
Other Information
Capacity Building
Training course held 10
Persons trained 157
Equipment provided
Vehicles
Motorbikes
Computers
54
SubProject Completion Report Summary
Nias
Subcomponent Units SPPR Target Achievement Total
Cost
2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil
1. Community Development
Community grants villages 15 15 0 19 0 19 3799
2. Fishing Vessels
Vessel 5-7 GT
boats 12 12
Vesel 5 GT 6 6 735
Vesel 7 GT 3 3 644
3. Aquaculture
Fish Cage unit 4 4 8 2 10 513
Pilot seaweed farming racks rackets 20 20 3 3 229
Seaweed boats boat 8 8 0
4. Fisheries Infrastructure
Fuel store/Depot no 1 1 1 1 243
Mobile ice plant no 1 1 1 1 1713
PPI Tuhemberua inc access road 1 1 2026
5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 0
6. Service Recovery 0
Construction of BBIP Fino phase 1 0 1 1 969
Construction of BBIP Fino phase 2
0 1 1 1142
Rehabilitation of Fishery (DKP) Dinas Office
0 1 1 89
Total cost 11360
a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab
Other Information
Capacity Building
Training course held 11
Persons trained 468
Equipment provided
Vehicles
Motorbikes
Computers
55
SubProject Completion Report Summary Nias Selatan
Units SPPR Target Achievement Total
Cost Subcomponent 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil 1. Community Development Community grants villages 15 35 50 4 20 24 4797 2. Fishing Vessels Purse seiners 7GT boats 6 6 3 3 735 Purse seiners 5GT boats 9 9 9 9 1066 Fishing lights lights 0 0 3. Aquaculture Marine cage units 4 4 8 8 400 Pilot seaweed farming racks racks 4 4 6 6 344 4. Fisheries Infrastructure Fuel station no 0 1 1 243 Jetties no 0 1 1 990 Mobile ice plant no 1 1 1 1 1670 5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 0 0 6. Service Recovery
Rehabilitation of Fisheries (DKP) Dinas Office 0 1 1 347
Total cost 9848
a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab
Other Information
Capacity Building Training course held 11 Persons trained 477
Equipment provided Vehicles Motorbikes
Computers
56
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT
APPENDIX 3: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
ADB‐BRR ETESP FISHERIES 2005‐2009 KPI ‐ TARGETS – ACHIEVEMENTS – SUBMITTED TO CFAN
Key Performance Indicators
Sub compo
nent
Target
Progress and
Achievemen
ts
1 Area of fishponds restored (ha) SC3 3,244 3,304.472 Number of boats (5‐20GT range) and fishing gears delivered and operational SC2 152 1493 Number of fish landings or jetties rebuilt SC4 15 19 4 Number of trees in coastal areas planted SC5 1,000,000 1,274,952 5 Number of Provincial/District Government fisheries offices rehabilitated SC6 5 5 6 Number of community contracts completed SC1 268 966 7 Number of community contract beneficiaries SC1 16,200 17,862 8 Number of beneficiaries from boats and fishing gears grant program SC2 893 1,575 9 Number of beneficiaries from fishpond restoration SC3 4,862 5,041
10 Number of hatcheries rebuilt and functioning SC3 58 4911 Number of primary beneficiaries from hatcheries rebuilt SC3 58 49 12 Number of secondary beneficiaries from hatcheries operation SC3 3,480 3,512 13 Number of beneficiaries from other small scale aquaculture activities SC3 2,376 2,540 14 Number of beneficiaries from rebuilding of fish landings or jetties SC4 5,575 8,523 15 Number of beneficiaries from ice plants rebuilding SC4 4,234 4,324 16 Number of beneficiaries from rebuilding of fish markets and packing sheds SC4 1,000 1,030 17 Total number of training participants from DKP SC6 1,214 902 18 Number of boat captains trained in GPS and navigation tool use SC2 63 175 19 Number of beneficiaries from community bathymetric mapping program SC2 2,835 2,835 20 Number of capture fisheries related livelihoods service centers established SC2 8 8 21 Number of beneficiaries from 8 capture fisheries related livehoods service centers SC3 1,600 1,600 22 Number of audience of Panglima Laot newsletter services SC2 8,000 8,000 23 Number of aquaculture related livelihoods service centers established SC3 6 424 Number of beneficiaries of 1 aquaculture communications and 4 livelihoods service centers SC3 6,000 4,00025 Number of GPS or echo sounders distributed and installed on boats SC2 63 90 26 Number of fish markets and packing shed rebuilt SC4 5 5 27 Number of training courses conducted SC6 72 52 29 Number of training services provided at livelihoods service centers SC6 70 24 30 Number of ice plants rebuilt SC4 10 531 Number of awareness campaigns on coastal environment conservation SC5 3 3 32 Number of asset co‐management meetings held SC6 9 1033 Number of coastal and marine areas charts and maps distributed SC2 150 350 34 Number of radio communication centers and networks established SC3 2 2 35 Number of aquaculture related information center established SC3 1 1 36 Number of innovative beneficiary websites functioning SC2/3 4 437 Number of publications – technical reports, guidelines, manuals, posters, videos All SC
57
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT
APPENDIX 5: LIST OF KEY DATES
Activities Key dates Inception Report Submitted 19 October 2005 Consultant Package 4 Contract signed 23 August 2005 Contract Variation 1 13 November 2005 Contract Variation 2 17 April 2006 Contract Variation 3 25 April 2006 Contract Variation 4 05 May 2006 Contract Variation 5 17 May 2006 Contract Variation 6 13 March 2007 Contract Variation 7 27 September 2007 Contract Variation 8 14 March 2008 Contract Variation 9 04 September 2008 Contract Variation 10 11 May 2009 Consultant Package 40 Contract signed 18 March 2008 Contract Variation 1 26 November 2008 Contract Variation 2 13 January 2009 Contract Variation 3 22 April 2009 Contract Variation 4 25 June 2009 ETESP Fisheries closure 30 June 2009
58
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT APPENDIX 6 SUMMARY OF CONSULTING SERVICES BY NACA
Package 4 Person‐months
International
Team Leader/Project Management Specialist TL/PMS 24.50
Fisheries Economist FE 13.00
Aquaculture Environment Specialist AES 17.00
Total 54.50
Domestic
Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Banda Aceh/Aceh Besar) SA/PMS 18.8900Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Banda Aceh/Aceh Besar) SA/PMS 16.0000Site Adviser/Project Mangement Specialist (Banda Aceh/Aceh Besar) SA/PMS 23.2067Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Simeulue) SA/PMS 20.5000Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Aceh Utara and Lhokseumawe) SA/PMS 27.0000Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Aceh Barat) SA/PMS 23.5667Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Aceh Jaya) SA/PMS 21.0000Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Bireuen) SA/PMS 26.0000Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Pidie) SA/PMS 25.6200Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Nias) SA/PMS 26.5000Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Nias Selatan) SA/PMS 26.0000Site Adviser/Project Mangement Specialist (Lhokseumawe) SA/PMS 9.3000
Fisheries Infrastructure Specialist FIS 24.0000Coastal Capture Fisheries Specialist CCFS 13.0000Social Development Specialist SDS 27.8167Fisheries Project Implementation Specialist FPIS 16.5667Aquaculture Specialist AS 9.0000Government Procurement and Budgeting Specialist GPBS 10.5000Coastal Environment Specialist CES 7.6500
Communications and Information Specialist CIS 10.8667
Fisheries Infrastructure Specialist (Nias) FIS 8.5000
Community Training Specialist CTS 5.7600Total 397.2435
59
Package 40 Person‐months
International Team Leader/Project Management Specialist TL/PMS 7.50Fisheries Economist FE 3.00Aquaculture Environment Specialist AES 3.00Total 13.50Domestic Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Banda Aceh/Aceh Besar) SA/PMS 8.1600Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Simeulue) SA/PMS 9.1000Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Aceh Utara and Lhokseumawe) SA/PMS 7.9000Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Aceh Barat) SA/PMS 8.8667Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Aceh Jaya) SA/PMS 9.2333Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Bireuen) SA/PMS 7.4000Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Pidie) SA/PMS 11.5000Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Nias) SA/PMS 8.9000Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Nias Selatan) SA/PMS 8.6900Fisheries Infrastructure Specialist FIS 7.0000Coastal Capture Fisheries Specialist CCFS 7.0000Social Development Specialist SDS 9.9033Fisheries Project Implementation Specialist FPIS 10.8000Aquaculture Specialist AS 11.7000Government Procurement and Budgeting Specialist GPBS 10.5000Coastal Environment Specialist CES 8.2000Communications and Information Specialist CIS 7.5000Community Training Specialist CTS 12.3000Total 164.6533
60
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT
APPENDIX 7. SOURCES & LISTS OF EQUIPMENT PROCURED
• NACA – OFF BUDGET FOR CONSULTANT USE
• NACA - ON LOAN FOR CONSULTANT USE FROM SATKER/BRR
• MMAF – ON BUDGET FOR SATKER/SATGAS USE
• BRR – ON BUDGET FOR SATKER USE
• PMO/EMS – MOSS EQUIPMENT FOR CONSULTANT USE
1
DAFTAR INVENTARIS BARANG MILIK SATKER DKP-RI DAN USULAN PERUNTUKANNYA
IDENTITAS ASET OPERSIONAL KONDISI Present user
Present allocation Suggested transfer Note
Item MEREK/brand TYPE/MODEL
VOL
SAT
NO. IDENTI
TAS B R
R RB NAME Position
A. KENDARAAN OPERASIONAL
1. Mobil Isuzu Panther Minibus 2 Unit BL 268 AI √
Muhammad Iqbal
ex. Kasatker/Staf BRR
utk operasional s.d. 31Maret 09 Dinas KP NAD
BL 267 AI √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD pinjam pakai sementara Dinas KP NAD
Isuzu D-Max 4x4 Double Cabin 3 Unit
BL 8009 AG √ M. Daud
ex. PPK/Staf BRR
utk operasional s.d. 31Maret 09
BBIP Busung, Simeulue
BL 8010 AG √ Thamren
ex. PPK/Staf BRR
utk operasional s.d. 31Maret 09 BBIP Fino, Nias
BL 8011 AG √ M. Tajuddin
ex. PPK/Staf BRR
utk operasional s.d. 31Maret 09 Dinas KP NAD
2. Sepeda Motor Suzuki FD 125 XSD 27 Unit BL 2260 AR √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
BL 2267 AR √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara BBIP Fino, Nias
BL 2271 AR √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD
pinjam pakai sementara
BBIP Busung, Simeulue
BL 2275 AR √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD
pinjam pakai sementara Dinas KP NAD
BL 2274 AR √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD
pinjam pakai sementara Dinas KP NAD
BL 2284 AR √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
BL 2428 AR √
Satgas DKP, Jakarta
pinjam pakai sementara DKP
BL 2273 AR √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
BL 2265 AR √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
BL 2264 AR √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
BL 2269 AR √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
BL 2262 AR √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
BL 2263 AR √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
BL 2273 AR √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
BL 2276 AR √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
BL 2261 AR √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
2
BL 2266 AR √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
BL 2277 AR √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
BL 2278 AR √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
BL 2263 AR √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
BL 2268 AR √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
BL 2280 AR √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
BL 2285 AR √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
BL 2269 AR √
DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
BL 2270 AR √
DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
BL 2281 AR √
DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
BL 2282 AR √
DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
B. PERALATAN KOMPUTER DAN ELEKTRONIK
1. Note book Toshiba Satellite 2 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
1 Unit √ Thamren Staf BRR utk operasional s.d. Maret 2008
DKP Aceh Utara
1 Unit √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD pinjam pakai sementara Dinas KP NAD
Untuk Dihapuskan
1 Unit √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD pinjam pakai sementara Dinas KP NAD
Toshiba PORTEGE R10 1 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
Satellite R10-P2301 2 Unit √
Satgas DKP, Jakarta operasional Satgas DKP
2. Komputer PC Acer Power F2 4 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
2 Unit √ Satgas DKP, Jakarta operasional Satgas DKP
1 Unit √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
1 Unit √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
1 Unit √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
1 Unit √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
1 Unit √ DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
3. UPS Superpower VT 600 3 Unit
√ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
4. Stabilizer Minamoto 2 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
Sako 3 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
3
5. Printer Warna Canon iP 4000 1 Unit √
Untuk Dihapuskan
6. Printer BW HP LASERJET 1160 4 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
2 Unit
Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
1 Unit √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
1 Unit √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
1 Unit √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
1 Unit √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
1 Unit √
DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
7. Scanner CANON LIDE 500 F 2 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
1 Unit √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD
pinjam pakai sementara Dinas KP NAD
1 Unit √
Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
1 Unit √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
1 Unit √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
1 Unit √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
1 Unit √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
1 Unit √
DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
8. Kamera Digital CANON A95 3 Unit
√ Untuk Dihapuskan
A610 1 Unit √
Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
1 Unit √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
1 Unit √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
1 Unit √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
1 Unit √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
1 Unit √
DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
9. Handycam Sony 2 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
BBIP Busung, Simeulue
DCR-DVD653E 1 Unit √
Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
10. Fax PANASONIC KX-FP342 1 Unit
√ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD pinjam pakai sementara Dinas KP NAD
2 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
KX-FP 342CX 1 Unit √
Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
4
1 Unit √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
1 Unit √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
1 Unit √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
1 Unit √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
1 Unit √
DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
11. LCD Proyektor ACER PD116 1 Unit
√ Richard Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD
sedang di-servis
1 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
PD 116P 1 Unit √
Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
1 Unit √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD
pinjam pakai sementara Dinas KP NAD
12. TV Panasonic 1 Unit √
Richard Coutts Konsultan temporary used
BBIP Busung, Simeulue
TC-21 FJ22J 1 Unit √
Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
13. AC Split CHANGHONG KF-35 GW/C3 2 Unit
√ Richard Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD
Panasonic 2 Unit √
Richard Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD
2 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
1 Unit √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD
pinjam pakai sementara Dinas KP NAD
14. Calculator Casio DM-1600 TV-w 1 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
15. Calculator Struk Canon MP1411-DL 2 Unit
√ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
16. Mesin Tik Olympia Carina 4 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
17. Mesin Hitung Uang Promaxi 400 HS 1 Unit
√ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
18. Paper Shrader Promaxi S-22L 1 Unit
√ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
19. Sensor Uang Italy Optical
Italy Optical Product 1 Unit
√ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
20. Brankas Chubbsafes
Cobra Exwcutive B Three 1 Unit
√ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD pinjam pakai sementara Dinas KP NAD
C. MEUBELAIR
1. Lemari
Lemari Besi dan Kaca Brother B 304 1 Unit √
Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
Mustang M502 2 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
Lemari Kayu dan Kaca Topix BC 510 1 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM
pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
5
Style LSG02 3 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
2 Unit √ Richard Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD
Style LSG02 1 Unit DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
Style LSG02 1 Unit DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
Style LSG02 1 Unit DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
Style LSG02 1 Unit DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
Style LSG02 1 Unit DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
2. Filing Cabinet Brother B 104 2 Unit √ Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
Mustang M301 8 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
Mustang M301 1 Unit √ Richard Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD
1 Unit DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
1 Unit DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
1 Unit DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
1 Unit DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
1 Unit DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
3. Meja
Meja Biro Olimpic MTB-1805 2 Unit √ Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
6 Unit √ Untuk Dihapuskan
Meja 1/2 Biro Olimpic MTS-1805 20 Unit √ Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
16 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
4 Unit DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
4 Unit DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
4 Unit DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
4 Unit DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
4 Unit DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
Meeting table Topix CT 500 1 Unit √ Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
1 Unit √ Richard Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD
1 Unit DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
1 Unit DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
1 Unit DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
6
1 Unit DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
1 Unit DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
Meja Telp Sucitra LH 1202 2 Unit √ Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
Style LSG 01 6 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
Meja Printer Uchiwa 1 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
Photocopy desk Victor 1 Unit √
Richard Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD
4. Chair
Kursi Kerja Biro Oshinto 953 TW 2 Unit √
Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
Big Star MC 076 HD 6 Unit √ Richard Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD
Working chair Isebel 320 T Rakuda 15 Unit √ Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
Big Star SC-508 17 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
8 Unit √ Richard Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD
4 Unit DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
4 Unit DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
4 Unit DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
4 Unit DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias 4 Unit DKP Nias
Selatan operasional DIU DKP Nias
Selatan
Kursi Rapat Isebel 186 T 15 Unit √ Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
Uchiwa PA-708NK 21 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
9 Unit √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD pinjam pakai sementara Dinas KP NAD
15 Unit DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
15 Unit DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
15 Unit DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
15 Unit DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
15 Unit DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
Sofa tamu+meja Dinasty Montana 1 Unit √
Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
Modis Tamara 1 set √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
5. White Board Sakura 60x90 cm 2 unit √ Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
1 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
7
3 Unit √ Richard Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD
240x125 cm 1 Unit √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar
1 Unit √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie
1 Unit √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara
1 Unit √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias
1 Unit √ DKP Nias Selatan operasional DIU
DKP Nias Selatan
6. Rak
Rak TV Gold 803 1 Unit √ Satgas DKP, Jakarta DKP
Viano MAF 525 1 Unit √ Richard Coutts Konsultan temporary used
BBIP Busung, Simeulue
Rak Sepatu Grafer SR 911 1 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM pinjam pakai sementara SUPM Ladong
1
NOTULENSI RAPAT PEMBAHASAN ASET ETESP DKP RUANG RAPAT PMO ETESP BRR
SELASA, 3 FEBRUARI 2009
1. Laptop for BBIP Busung and BBIP Fino will be provided by NACA each 2 units 2. PC for BBIP Busung and BBIP Fino will be provided byNACA each 2 units 3. Printer for BBIP Busung and BBIP Fino will be provided by NACA each 1 unit 4. DKP will prepare a letter explained that the entire ETESP assets under DKP and still be used (address to PMO ETESP BRR) 5. PMO will delivers a letter to MMAF at Jakarta to further process the transfer and/or write-off the assets as detail attached of which copied to: - Konsultan (NACA) - EMS - Deputi Bidang Ekonomi dan Usaha BRR
Team Leader Consultan ETESP ADB Perikanan Ka. Satgas Serah Terima Aset Team Leader PMO ETESP BRR
Signed Signed Signed
Richard Coutts Yusya Abubakar Addie Permono
1
NOTULENSI RAPAT PEMBAHASAN ASET ETESP DKP RUANG RAPAT PMO ETESP BRR
SELASA, 3 FEBRUARI 2009
1. Laptop untuk BBIP Busung dan BBIP Fino akan diberikan oleh Konsultan ETESP ADB Perikanan (NACA) masing-masing 2 unit 2. PC untuk BBIP Busung dan BBIP Fino akan diberikan oleh Konsultan ETESP ADB Perikanan (NACA) masing-masing 2 unit 3. Printer untuk BBIP Busung dan BBIP Fino akan diberikan oleh Konsultan ETESP ADB Perikanan (NACA) masing-masing 1 unit 4. DKP membuat surat yang menerangkan bahwa seluruh aset ETESP berada di DKP dan masih digunakan (ditujukan kepada PMO ETESP BRR) 5. PMO akan menyampaikan Surat ke DKP di Jakarta untuk memproses lebih lanjut tentang pelimpahan dan/atau penghapusan aset dengan rincian sebagaimana terlampir yang ditembuskan kepada : - Konsultan (NACA) - EMS - Deputi Bidang Ekonomi dan Usaha BRR
Team Leader Consultan ETESP ADB PerikananKa. Satgas Serah Terima Aset
Team Leader PMO ETESP BRR
Richard Coutts Yusya Abubakar Addie Permono
1
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT
APPENDIX 7c
Inventory of Electronic Equipment Procured Off‐Budget by ETESP NACA Consultants with Proposed Hand Over
at May 2009
No Item Type/Brand Total Item
Note: present condition/location Transfer to Number Unit
1 Laptop ION (PT Metrodata) / Pentium M 16 units Working and in
Good Condition
a. 2 units to BBIP Busong b. 2 units to BBIP Fino c. 3 units to LSC‐CF d. 5 units to JFPR e. 4 units to CBBS
2 Laptop Dell 1 Unit Irna AACC
3 Laptop Toshiba 1 Unit Working CBBS
4 Laptop Zyrex 1 Unit Chacha CBBS
5 Printer Epson CX 1500 8 Units 4 working
4 damage a. 4 units CBBS b. 4 units AACC
6 Printer Epson CX 3500 2 Units Working a. BBIP Busong b. BBIP Fino
7 Printer HP 2605 Colour Laser Jet 1 unit Working (80%) ALSC
8 Printer HP 2655 BW 1 unit Working CBBS
9 Printer + Photo Copier Panasonic 1820 E 1 unit Working DKP NAD?
2
10 Scanner Canon Lide 25 1 Unit Working CBBS
11 PC HP AMD PC W5070I 1 unit Working LSC‐CF
12 PC HP AMD α 1238I 2 units Working a. 1 unit BBIP Busong b. 1 unit BBIP Fino
13 GPS Garmin eTrex 8 units From WFP (loan; no documentation)
a. 4 units CBBS b. 4 units AACC
14 Camera Microtek Take IT S3 7 units other camera
damaged or lost
a. 1 unit BBIP Busong b. 1 unit BBIP Fino c. 2 units AACC d. 3 units ALSC
15 External HD small capacity 60 GB 3 units 2 working
1 damage CBBS
16 External HD large capacity 500 GB 1 unit Working NACA
17 Router 3com / Internet hub 2 units Working 1. AACC
2. LSC‐CF/CBBS
18 External DVD Burner LG 1 unit Damaged suggestion: write‐off
19 Power Stabilizer SAKO SVC ‐ 2000 VA 3 units Working a. 1 unit BBIP Busong b. 1 unit BBIP Fino c. 1 unit AACC
20 UPS Mitsui 10 units 6 Working
4 broken
a. 1 unit LSC‐CF b. 1 unit BBIP Busong c. 1 unit BBIP Fino
3
21 Water dispenser Uchida 1 unit working AACC
22 Filing cabinet Lion 1 units Good AACC
23 Fan 1 unit Working AACC
24 Satelite Phone Sony Ericsson 1 unit Yet being used Given by ADB; Return or Transfer to ?
25 Paper Shredder Pro Tech 1 unit Working AACC
4
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT APPENDIX 7d HANDOVER OF AACC & EQUIPMENT PROCURED OFF BUDGET BY NACA
5
6
7
8
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT APPENDIX 7e. RETURN OF FURNITURE & OFFICE EQUIPMENT BORROWED BY NACA CONSULTANTS FROM BRR SATKER
The consultants procured computers and office equipment, including filing cabinets, using off-budget ETESP funds. However, all furniture was on loan from BRR Satker and had been procured by them using ETESP funds on-budget. The consultants rented cars and motorcycles throughout (2005-2009) and did not procure any vehicles.
Explanatory email:
----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Coutts To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] ; 'Sena De Silva' ; 'CV Mohan' ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 4:16 PM Subject: Re: ADB ETESP FISHERIES - CONSOLIDATION/FINALISATION - MOVE OFFICE Pieter Smidt Head, PMO/EMS ADB NAD & Nias Pieter, I would like to inform you that with effect from 1 April 2009, ADB ETESP NACA Fisheries consultants have moved out of the large Blower office in Banda Aceh. Furniture and office equipment purchased by Satker with on-budget ETESP funds and previously on loan from BRR to ETESP NACA consultants has been returned. The scanned handwritten handover documents are attached for PMO/EMS and NACA records. We are still chasing the ex-Satker Pak Iqbal to obtain a more formal hand back document. The core management team of ETESP Fisheries is now located at a temporary office in White House, part of the Green Paradise Hotel complex in the Ajeun Jeumpet area of town. Richard Coutts ADB ETESP Fisheries Team Leader
9
10
11
Appendix 8 ADB ETESP FISHERIES – FINAL SUMMARY OF ALL TRAINING ON & OFF BUDGET NACA FISHERIES CONSULTANTS & BRR FISHERIES SATKER SEPTEMBER 2005 – MARCH 2009
YEAR/TRAINING THEME Location DurationNo.days
No. Trainees
CostRp.
Other outputs* Comment
YEAR 2006
DIPA 2006 and 2006L
Crab fattening Banda Aceh 17‐18/11‐06 40 35,839,000
Training reports Training is aimed to improve technical knowledge in crab fattening and assist the village group to prepare their plan for a small scale crab fattening project.
Environmental monitoring Banda Aceh 14‐
15/12/06 17 127,815,000
Training reports Training of DIU in environmental monitoring of sub‐projects according to GOI/ADB guidelines
BMPT meeting Banda Aceh 12/9/2006 105 99,806,000
Training reports Workshop (meeting) of BMPT members (active and non active members) for information/idea gathering to re‐establish/strengthen the BMPT institution.
Seaweed farming Pulo Aceh, Aceh Besar
14‐15/12/06 20 66,655,000
Training reports Training for seaweed farmers improving skills in seaweed culture; supporting implementation seaweed farming project in Pulo Aceh, Aceh Besar.
Cage culture for Aceh Barat district Meulaboh
13‐14/12/06 23
151,519,000
Training reports Technical and management training for farmers in Aceh Barat involved in ADB ETESP tilapia cage culture project implementation.
Marine cage for Simeulue district Simeulue
17‐18/12/06 27
Training fish farmers in Simeulue involved in ADB ETESP marine cage culture projects..
12
Brackish aquaculture for Banda Aceh and Aceh Besar Aceh Besar
14‐15/12/06 25
35,839,000
Training reports Training of tambak brackish water aquaculture farmers in better management practice following ADB ETESP pond rehabilitation projects in selected districts.
Brackish aquaculture for Aceh Utara, Lhoseumawe and Bireun Lhokseumawe
17‐18/12/06 21
Training of tambak farmers in better management practice in brackish aquaculture, strengthening ADB ETESP pond rehabilitation projects in selected districts
Fishing gear building, operating and maintenance Aceh Besar
7‐8/12/2006 44
410,692,000 Training of fishers from 11 ETESP districts improving technical skills in fishing gear building, operating and maintenance
Basic safety training Aceh Besar 9‐
10/12/2006 44
Training of fishers from 11 project districts improving technical skills in basic safety at sea.
Boat building, operating and maintenance Aceh Besar
13‐14/12/2006 44
Training of fishers from 11 project districts improving technical skills in fishing boat building, operating and maintenance
Panglima Laot Banda Aceh 5‐
7/12/2006 174 219,254,000 Training of Panglima Laot from NAD.
Crab culture for Aceh Besar and Aceh Utara Aceh Besar 6 /12/2006 20
75,000,000
Training reports Technical and management skill training for farmers in Aceh Besar and Aceh Utara who are beneficiaries of ADB ETESP crab culture project.
Brackish‐water aquaculture for Aceh Besar Aceh Besar 12/13/2006 20
Training of tambak farmers in better management practice in brackishwater aquaculture, supporting beneficiaries of ADB ETESP pond rehabilitation projects in Aceh Besar.
13
Milk fish nursery Aceh Besar 22/12/ 2006 7
Training in milkfish nursery operations to improve farmer’s technical skill.
Grouper for Aceh Besar Aceh Besar 12/23/2006 3 Training grouper nursery management to improve farmers’ technical skill.
Hatchery for Aceh Besar, Pidie and Aceh Utara Aceh Besar 12/23/2006 8
Training hatchery management to improve technical skills
Crab culture for Pidie Pidie 1/20/2007 16
Technical and management skills training of farmers in Pidie who are beneficiaries of ADB ETESP crab culture project.
Brackish aquaculture for Pidie Pidie 12/14/2006 72
Training of tambak farmers in better management practice in brackishwater aquaculture, for beneficiaries of ADB ETESP pond rehabilitation projects in Pidie.
Brackish aquaculture for Aceh Utara Aceh Utara 12/17/2006 51
Training of tambak farmers in the better management practice in brackishwater aquaculture for beneficiaries of ADB ETESP pond rehabilitation projects in Aceh Utara
2007 DIPA 2007 and 2007L
DIU training workshop Banda Aceh 12‐13
March 2007 44
14
Fish processing
Acah Utara, Pidie and Bireuen
30 Nov – 22 Dec 2007 25 116,770,500
Training reports and documentations
Training on improving processed fish quality and business management supported by ADB ETESP Fisheries. Conducted swakelola by SATKER BRR ADB Perikanan 2007
NACA PACKAGE 4
Training for ETESP supported aquaculture villages
Aceh Besar and Aceh Utara
8‐Feb‐07 69 11,592,000 Training reports
Implemented by Ujung Batee aquaculture centre (Sugeng Raharjo)
Training for ETESP supported aquaculture villages in Pidie and Lhokseumawe
Pidie and Lhokseumawe
6‐Apr‐07 January 2008
150 24,455,000.
Training reports
Implemented by Ujung Batee aquaculture centre (Sugeng Raharjo)
Small business training for potential ice plant operators on Nias and Nias Selatan
Nias and Nias Selatan
n/a 15
Cancelled
Training and certification of home based fish processing business (women/men)
Banda Aceh 4‐Jul‐07 24 17,181,000
Training reports, presentations, the groups registered to the industry department and one group have successfully improved their market.
Completed as direct payment by NACA
Schools Mangrove Awareness Campaign in Lhokseumawe
Lhokseumawe 14‐Aug‐07 200 55,800,000 Training reports, presentations and documentations
Completed, Unsyiah (Bp. Muhammad)
15
SONAR MAPPING
GPS Sounder training Lampulo, Banda Aceh 1 day 39 100,000
GPS navigation training for fishers of Lampulo, Banda Aceh (work together with AGDC)
GPS Sounder training Lampulo, Banda Aceh 1 day 54 100,000
GPS navigation training for fishers of Lampulo, Banda Aceh (work together with AGDC)
GPS Sounder training Lampulo, Banda Aceh 1 day 24 200,000 Training at Sea
Conference Kuala Lumpur 1 day ? 2,000,000 MapAsia Conference 07
Needs Assessment Lhoong 1 day 48 500,000
Meeting with Panglima Laots and captains from surrounding area to discuss needs assessment, future development
Needs Assessment Sigli 1 day 4 500,000
Meeting with Panglima Laot and TNI from Sigli area to discuss needs assessment, future development
Needs Assessment Pulau Aceh 1 day 14 400,000
Meeting with Panglima Laot and Teupins, DKP from surrounding area to discuss needs assessment, future development
Needs Assessment Pulau Wei 1 day 26 500,000
Meeting with Panglima Laot, Kota, Panglima Laot, Teupins from on Pulau Wei to discuss needs assessment, future development
Needs Assessment Banda Aceh 1 day 50,000 Indonesian Society for remote sensing, International Workshop
Needs Assessment Calang 2 days 3 2,000,000
Meeting with Panglima Laots from surrounding area to discuss needs assessment, future development
2008 DIPA 2008 and 2008L Workshop Management and hand over assets of ADB ETESP Fisheries Banda Aceh
21‐July 2008 100 39,892,000
Training reports and photo documentations Conducted by BANDOU ACHA
16
Simeulu fish processor Simeulue processor
16‐17 April 2008 20 49,900,000
Training reports and photo documentations
Assisting fish processors in Simeulue villages who have been supported by ADB ETESP‐Fisheries village grant scheme to improve the quality of their product. Conducted by BANDOU ACHA
Lhokseumawe Fish processor Lhokseumawe
15‐16 Augustus 2008 25 49,850,000
Assisting fish processors in Lhokseumawe villages mainly women improve the quality of processed fish. Conducted by CV. INFOTECH BUILDING
BBM management training Gunung Sitoli, Nias
5‐7 November 2008 6 60,000,000
Training reports, presentations and photo documentations.
Training on BBM operation and management for Nias ADB ETESP Fisheries supported BBM managers and employees.
Nias post harvest training Gunung Sitoli, Nias
7‐8 November 2008 20 50,000,000
Training reports, presentations and photo documentations.
Training emphasizes on seaweed processed products for seaweed farmers/house wives in Nias. It is intended to cover small quantity of seaweed production in Nias as the alternative market.
Nias Farmers/Fishers training Nias
10‐12 November 2008 7 80,000,000
Training reports, presentations and photo documentations.
Training on improving efficiency of PPI, TPI and Fish market operation ensuring sustainability of its operation and uses in long run.
Tilapia culture training Aceh Barat
28‐30 November 2008 20 25,000,000
Training reports, presentations and photo documentations.
Technical training on tilapia culture methods for ADB ETESP Fisheries supported project in Aceh Barat. Improving farmer's skills on technical tilapia farming and business management.
NACA PACKAGE 4
Seaweed training in Nias and Nisa Selatan
Nias and Nias Selatan
Period 10‐Feb‐ to April
2008 459 114,950,000
Training reports, presentations, list of attendances and photos
Completed; Kalimajari (NGO from Bali) and 3 separated contracts for VSTs
17
On hands brackish water farming assistance in Lhokseumawe
Lahokseumawe
Period 25 Feb to May
2008
6 groups (50)
15,777,000
Training reports list of attendances and photos
Conducted as technical assistant for farmers by Ujung Bate staff
NACA PACKAGE 40
Seaweed farm production/marketing phase II
Nias and
Nias Selatan April‐August 147 256,290,000
Training reports, presentations ,list of attendances and photos
Conducted by NGO Kalimajari.
Due to seaweed growth problem during, training implementation is rescheduled and adopted according to the seaweed growth
Simeulue grouper nursery Simeulue 24‐25 April 2008
10 17,300,000
Training reports and photos
Completed and directly implemented by NACA.
Grouper hatchery (BBIP), nursery and farmers
Nias, Nias Selatan and Simuelue
May‐December 2008
243 746,750,000
Training reports, presentations, documentations, hand book of grouper farming in cage and Standard Operation Procedure for Busong BBIP
Directly implemented by NACA
Date of contract: 1 May 2008
Training is being continued, trainers contract have been extended to respond to technical support requirements from marine cage grouper farming and Fino and Bsuong BBIP..
Brackish water pond (shrimp & milkfish) – BMP and quality production capacity implementation assistance
Aceh Jaya, Aceh Besar, Pidie, Bireuen, Lhokseumawe and Aceh Utara
July‐December 2008
2800 546,000,000
Training reports, list of attendances and photos
Training ongoing. Hands on training is being conducted by District Aquaculture specialist distributed in Aceh Besar, Bireuen and Aceh Utara together with TPDs.
18
School mangrove awareness campaigns
Bireuen 29‐30 November 2008
150 79,800,000
Training reports, presentations list of attendances and photos
Aceh Jaya, Aceh Besar, Pidie, Bireuen, Lhokseumawe and Aceh Utara
School mangrove awareness campaigns
Pidie 7‐8 June 2008
150
.800.000
70,536,600
Training reports, presentations, list of attendances and photos
Implemented by local NGO SAKA.
Crab fattening training Aceh Utara, Aceh Besar, Pidie, Biuren
October‐December
250 120,280,000
Training reports, presentations, documentations and hand book of crab fattening techniques
technical training will continue to December; good season with good price for crab fattening
BBIP staff training Gondol June‐ July 2008
4
93,600,000
Training reports, presentations list of attendances and photos
Implemented by: BBRPBL Gondol
Date of contract: 2 June 2008
Date of completion: 23 July 2008
Village extension training Aceh Utara, 26‐29 May 32 9.
Training reports, presentations, list
Implemented by BBIP Ujung Bate
19
Aceh Besar, Pidie, Biuren
2008 250
64,589,000
of attendances and photos.
Date of contract: 8 May 2008
Date of completion: 9 June 2008
Green Conference Exhibition
Banda Aceh 2‐3 July 2008
6,420,000 Photos documentations
Directly implemented by NACA.
BBIP staff to Gondol phase II
Gondol
16 June‐15 July 20084
3 84,600,000
Training reports, presentations and photo documentations
Implemented by: BBRPBL Gondol
Date of contract: 17 September 2008
Date of completion: 23 November 2008
Business management training
Nias, Nias Selatan, Simuelue, Pidie, Bireun, Aceh Utara, Lhokseumawe, Aceh Besar
September‐December 2008
500 88,300,000
Training reports, presentations and photos Implemented by: NACA by hiring a individual
trainer
Date of contract: 17 September 2008
Date of completion: December 2008.
Nias and Nias Selatan farmers trip to Medan
Nias and Nias Selatan
November 2008
8 27,500,000 Cancelled due to no replacement of died grouper fingerlings by supplier.
Livelihood Service Centres for Capture Fisheries
Initial IT Computer: Word, Spreadsheets & Internet
Centralized:
Unsyiah‐Darusallam
Computer Lab
6 Days 32 46,580,000 Pre & Post Test, Report, Attendance
list, & Photos
Pre tests scores @ 45% correct answers;
Post tests scores @ 73% correct answers given to multiple choice questions
20
Banda Aceh
Initial Database Use Lampulo Training Center
1 Day 32 4,640,000 Attendance list & Photos
Needed skills and understanding to support fish price collection activities
BRR Community Contract Execution & Reporting
Lampulo Training Center
1 Day 40 12,784,700 Attendance lists & Photo
Training provide by both Project Staff and BRR Staff in attendance
Radio Communications Lampulo
Training Center
1 Day 28 4,000,000 Photos Part of Panglima Laot Induction Ceremony –afternoon training
SONAR MAPPING
Needs Assessment Lhokgna 1 day 7 400,000
Meeting with Panglima Laots from surrounding area to discuss needs assessment, future development
Needs Assessment Meulaboh ‐ Aceh Barat 2 days 17 2,500,000
Meeting with Panglima Laots from Meulaboh area to discuss needs assessment, future development
Needs Assessment Lampulo, Banda Aceh 1 day 53 300,000
Meeting with beneficiaries of GPS sounder and Panglima Laot Pusong (Lhokseumawe), Panglima Laot Calang, Panglima Laot Sabang, and Panglima Laot Pulo Aceh
Meeting with Government/Military officials Pulau Wei 2 days 6 1,000,000 Presentation and meeting with TNI
GPS Training Lampulo, Banda Aceh 1 day 38 Rp0
GPS navigation training for fishers of Lampulo, Banda Aceh (work together with BPPP)
GPS Sounder installation training Lhokseumawe 1 day 5 200,000 GPS Sounder installation training GPS Sounder installation training
Calang, Aceh Jaya 1 day 5 5,600,000 GPS Sounder installation training
21
Needs Assessment Lampulo, Banda Aceh 1 day 40 300,000
Meeting with Panglima Laot Lhok Krueng Aceh (Banda Aceh), Panglima Laot Sigli, Panglima Laot Meureudu, Panglima Laot Bireuen, Panglima Laot Lhokseumawe, Panglima Laot Calang, and Panglima Laot Lhoong Saney regarding Livelihoods Service Centers
Meeting with Government/Military officials
Lampulo, Banda Aceh 1 day 35 0
Fish Handling and Hygiene and Sanitation training for fishers of Lampulo (work together with DKP)
GPS Sounder training Calang, Aceh Jaya 5 days 5,600,000 GPS Sounder training
GPS Sounder training Lampulo, Banda Aceh 1 day 27 100,000
GPS Sounder training for the fishers of Lampulo, Banda Aceh
Conference Banda Aceh 1 day
Team Leader presented Rp0 Aceh Green Conference
Partnership Lampulo, Banda Aceh 1 day 47 250,000
Meeting with Panglima Laot Lhok Krueng Aceh (Banda Aceh), Panglima Laot Sigli, Panglima Laot Meureudu, Panglima Laot Bireuen, Panglima Laot Lhokseumawe, Panglima Laot Calang, and Panglima Laot Lhoong Saney, Panglima Laot Pulo Aceh, and Panglima Laot Sabang regarding Community Based Bathymetric Survey and illegal fishing
Conference Banda Aceh 1 day presen
ted,
2 stud
ents
had
posters
500,000 Aceh International Workshop on Disaster Recovery
2009 NACA PCKAGE 40 Shrimp and Fish Hatchery Training
Aceh Besar, Aceh Jaya, Pidie, Bireuen, Aceh Utara
23 February – 14 March 2009 ( 20 days)
18 171,561,500 Training reports, presentations list of attendances and photos.
The training conducted in cooperation with BBAP Ujung. The training is intended to introduce technologies in fish hatchery as the alternative of shrimp hatcheries.
Tilapia Farming, Packaging Aceh Barat and 2 February – 534 223,107,500 Training reports The training is conducted directly by NACA
22
and Marketing Training Aceh Jaya 16 March 2009
including materials and documentations, leaflet tilapia farming in cage, Leaflet tilapia farming technique in pond, Leaflet live transport technique, Leaflet tilapia nursery technique.
ADB ETESP Fisheries with technical supports from BBAT Suka Bumi. The training is intended to provide practical training in tilapia farming, marketing and live packaging.
23
Training at Lampung Marine Fish Culture Centre (BBPBL) for Manager of Marine Fish Hatchery (BBIP) Busong, Simeulue
Lampung 21 February – 4 March 2009
1 25,575,000
Training reports including presentations and training documentations.
The training is held in BBRPBL Lampung. The training provides first‐hand, practical knowledge and help develop skills in marine fish hatchery management BBIP.
Training on Responsible Lobster Collection, Fattening and Marketing
Aceh Besar and Aceh Jaya
9 February –28 March 2009
55 111,375,000 Training reports including presentations and training documentations. Environmentally and safe lobster diving poster; Leaflet of lobster collecting technique, Leaflet of lobster fattening technique, Leaflet of lobster holding technique
The training is conducted directly by NACA ADB ETESP Fisheries with technical supports from Lombok Mariculture Development Center. Training improves lobster collectors awareness and skills for responsible lobster collection and safe diving as well as live transport technique. The training introduce newly technologies in seed lobster collection using trapping devices and lobster peurulus grow out.
Assistance on co‐management of ADB ETESP Fisheries supported infrastructures
Aceh Besar, Pidie, Bireuen, Aceh Utara, Lhokseumawe, Aceh Barat, Aceh Jaya, Simeulue, Nias and Nias Selatan
1 January –31 March 2009
101 70,000,000 Training reports Capacity building supports for ADB ETESP fisheries supported infrastructure managers on Entrepreneurship, Production management and marketing Business Plan and assets management and maintenance
24
Brackish water pond (shrimp & milkfish) – BMP and quality production capacity implementation assistance
Pidie and Aceh Besar
1 January –31 March 2009
Training reports and photos
Livelihood Service Centres for Capture Fisheries
IT Computers: Word follow up
Lampulo Livelihood
Service Centre
1 Day 3 No costs Report & Photos Follow up training for the 3 Panglima Laot Officials in attendance
Follow Up Radio Communications on SSB &
VHF
Lampulo
Training Center
1 Day 33
267,500
Report, Attendance lists & Photos
Follow up training for Aceh Besar: Lampulo and Lhoong in attendance
Follow Up Radio Communications and IT Computers (combined)
On‐Site: Sigli Livelihood
Service Centre
1 Day 19
1,100,000
Report, Attendance lists & Photos
Follow up training for Sigli – Pidie in attendance
Navigation & Mapping On‐Site
LSC Peudada ‐ Bireuen
1 Day 35
2,015,000
Report & Photos LSC fisher groups, Marine Police, DKP & TNI staff in attendance
25
IT Computer & Radio Follow up (combined)
On‐Site
LSC
Mereudu – Pidie‐Jaya
1 Day 17
1,727,500
Report, Attendance list and Photos
LSC fisher groups and Marine Police in attendance
Navigation & Mapping On‐Site
LSC Mereudu – Pidie‐Jaya
1 Day 15
2,620,000
none All LSC Fisher group members in attendance
IT Computer & Radio Follow up (combined)
On‐Site
LSC Peudada ‐ Bireuen
1 Day 22
1,167,500
Report, Attendance list & Photos
LSC Fisher groups & Marine Police in attendance
IT Computer & Radio Follow up (combined)
On‐Site
LSC
Saney – Lhoong
1 Day 5
737,500
Report, Attendance list & Photos
All Panglima Laot Officials & LSC Facilitator in attendance
IT Computer & Radio Follow up (combined)
On‐Site
LSC
Calang – Aceh Jaya
1 Day 2
1,952,500
Report, Attendance list & Photos
Panglima Laot and LSC Facilitator in attendance
Navigation & Mapping On‐Site
LSC
Meulaboh –
1 Day 35
4,506,000
Report, Attendance list & Photos
LSC fisher groups, Marine Police, DKP & TNI staff in attendance
26
Aceh Barat
Radio Communications Follow up
On‐Site
LSC
Meulaboh – Aceh Barat
1 Day 18
2,727,500
Report, Attendance list & Photos
All Lhok Panglima Laot Officials in attendance
Navigation & Mapping On‐Site
LSC
Calang – Aceh Jaya
1 Day 11
4,185,000
Report, Attendance list & Photos
LSC Fisher group members in attendance
IT Computer & Radio Follow up (combined)
On‐Site: Sigli LSC
1 Day 22
3,202,000
Report, Attendance list & Photos
LSC fisher groups, Marine Police, DKP & TNI staff in attendance
Navigation & Mapping combined with Radio Comm.
Lampulo
Training Center
1 Day 19 2,042,000 Report, Attendance list & Photos
LSC Fisher groups from Pulo Aceh in attendance
Navigation & Mapping On‐Site:
Lhokseumawe
1 Day 60 2,950,000 Report, Attendance list & Photos
LSC fisher groups, Marine Police, DKP & TNI staff in attendance
Database Use Centralized
Lampulo LSC
1 Day 7 6,008,000 Report, Attendance list & Photos
LSC Facilitators from seven LSC sites in attendance
Navigation & Mapping Lampulo
Training Center
1 Day 22 3,850,000 Report, Attendance list & Photos
Lampulo LSC Fisher groups, LSC Facilitators, & Marine Police in attendance
27
Navigation & Mapping combined with Radio Comm.
On‐Site: Kota Sabang
1 Day 20 4,500,000 Report, Attendance list & Photos
10 Sabang Panglima Laot Officials, plus 5 Marine Police, plus 5 DKP staff in attendance
SONAR MAPING CBBS
GPS Sounder training Peudada, Bireuen 2 days 35 900,000
GPS Sounder training for fishers of Peudada, Panglima Laot Lhoks of Bireuen, and DKP
GPS Sounder training Meureudu 1 day 19 900,000
GPS Sounder training for the fishers of Meureudu, Panglima Laot Lhoks of Meureudu, and DKP
GPS Sounder training Meulaboh ‐ Aceh Barat 2 days 35 900,000
GPS Sounder training for fishers of Meulaboh, Panglima Laot Lhoks of Aceh Barat, and Navy
GPS Sounder training Calang, Aceh Jaya 1 day 11 500,000 GPS Sounder training for the fishers of Calang
GPS Sounder training Lhokseumawe 1 day 8 500,000 GPS Sounder and navigation training
GPS Sounder training Sigli 1 day 22 700,000
GPS Sounder training for fishers of Sigli, Panglima Laot Lhoks of Sigli, Marine Police and DKP
GPS Sounder training Lampulo, Banda Aceh 1 day 16 100,000
GPS Sounder training for the fishers of Lampulo, Panglima Laot Lhoks of Pulo Aceh, Panglima Laot Lhoks of Aceh Besar, and Police of Pulo Aceh
GPS Sounder training Lampulo, Banda Aceh 1 day 11 100,000
GPS Sounder training for the fishers of Lampulo, Banda Aceh
GPS Sounder installation training Lhokseumawe 10 days 60 1,800,000
GPS Sounder training for the fishers of Lhokseumawe, shipyard workers
GPS Sounder training Lampulo, Banda Aceh 1 day 19 100,000 GPS Sounder training
Partnership Lampulo, Banda Aceh 1 day 75 100,000
Meeting with Fishers of Lampulo and Marine polices ‐illegal fishing and development of future partnerships
Opportunities Assessment Banda Aceh 1 day 5 100,000
Meeting with Panglima Laots from surrounding area to discuss opportunities assessment, future development
28
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT
APPENDIX 9 ETESP Fisheries Socio-Economic Survey 2008
Financial and Economic Analysis of Sub Components SC1, SC2, SC3, and SC4
Late 2008 ETESP NACA Fisheries consultants undertook a rapid stakeholder/beneficiary survey in 2008 and was able to make a summary assessment of the socio economic impact of BRR ADB ETESP for sub components SC 1 Community Empowerment, SC 2 Capture Fisheries, SC3 Aquaculture and SC 4 Fisheries Infrastructure.
SC1, SC2 and SC4 each had 241, 36 and 54 activities respectively at the time of the survey.
The principal indicators set for each of these activities were the number of beneficiaries. Table 1 below identifies the beneficiaries achieved each sub component. These include direct as well as upstream/downstream beneficiaries. For each sub component, the number has been 17,862 (Sc 1), 1,414 (SC1), 3,664 (SC 3) and 8,258 (Sc 4). The number of female beneficiaries was estimated at 6,400.
On the basis of the US $32 million spent in the support program, the projected annual value added (plus profits) generated from each subcomponent is also shown in Table 1. This is equivalent to US $6 million per annum.
Total production generated from aquaculture and capture fisheries sub sector activities was estimated to be 11,000 tons.
Table 1: Summary economic indicators by component
Sub component Total beneficiaries (Col 2)
Value added (Rp million) Tonnes
Community empowerment 17,862 35,188
Small-scale capture fisheries
1,414 4,503 1,000
Small-scale aquaculture 3,664 15,451 10,000
Small-scale fish landings and post harvest facilities
8,258
Sub component 1: Fisheries livelihoods village grants
Summary of project outputs by economic activity
Two hundred and forty one (241) communities received village livelihoods grant assistance via community contracts for the restoration of livelihoods planned with their participation. The beneficiaries largely included groups requiring support in the following areas: boat rehabilitation, small-scale construction, provision of fishing gear and support inputs, fish processing and fish trading. The numbers of beneficiaries per kelompok are summarized in Table 2.
29
Table 2: Summary of BRR ADB ETESP fisheries related village livelihoods grant activities.
Average village group
size
Number of groups
Total beneficiaries Small-scale fishing (%)
Processing (%) Fish trading (%)
Other
< 30 28 534 68% 9% 9% 14%
30-60 87 3,680 56% 19% 18% 7%
60-100 84 5,551 49% 36% 12% 3%
100-150 30 3,045 52% 31% 12% 5%
150+ 12 2,290 52% 26% 13% 9%
Total 241 15,100 55% 25% 13% 7%
Source: ADB ETESP data base
The number of direct women beneficiaries in this sub component was 3,775. The number could be increased by up to 2,400 (FTE) with women workers supporting husbands in small-scale fishing, either for fish drying, or cleaning fishing nets.
Case studies
Economic and livelihood benefits
From case studies of 11 fisheries related SC 1 village livelihoods grants (Table 3), the average income per beneficiary per month was recorded at Rp 1.97 million. This represented an increase in pre tsunami earnings of 43%. Of the sample, there was only 1 case of a reduction in income reported.
Table 3: Case study of BRR ADB ETESP fisheries village grant economic indicators
Group Contract number Location
No.
Be
nefic
iarie
s Activity
Gro
up
inco
me
/ m
onth
pre
ts
unam
i
Gro
up
inco
me
/ m
onth
pos
t ts
unam
i
Av
inco
me/
bene
ficia
ry
% change
1 SPK.0300/BRR - 464652/K/XII/2006
Samatiga, Aceh Barat 78
small-scale fishing, trading & boat docking
Rp 480 m Rp 380 m Rp 4.9
m -20%
2
SPK.4.2670/BRR - ETESP.ADB/X/2007
Panta Raja, Pidie 57 Light boat (for
purse seining) 42.8 71.3 1.25 +67%
3
SPK.4.2686/BRR - ETESP.ADB/X/2007
Sampan tiga, Pidie 19 Krupu
processing 19 25.6 1.6 +60%
4
SPK.4.2607/BRR - ETESP.ADB/X/2007
Muara Tiga, Pidie 22
Small boat fishing (hand line)
2.4 5.6 2.8 133%
30
5
SPK.0330-38/BRR - 464652/K/XII/2006
Blang Mangat, Lhokseumawe
35 Fish trader 4.5 6.0 0.2 33%
6
SPK.4.2491/BRR - ETESP.ADB/IX/2007
Peukan Bada, Aceh Besar
69 Fishing/processing/trading
5.5 6.2 0.1 11%
7 SPK.4.2687/BRR-ETESP.ADB/X/2007
Desa Paya Baro, shrimp nets
36 Shrimp nets 32 80 2.2 150%
8 SPK.4.2424/BRR-ETESP.ADB/X/2007
Muara Batu, Aceh Utara 165
Fishers/fish drying /traders
209 389 2.4 86%
9 SPK.3.193.1/BP-BRR-890331/VII/2008
Jeunieb, Bireun 47
Small-scale fishing/fish drying/trading
62.6 98.1 2.1 57%
10
SPK.S3.038.4/BRR-ETESP.ADB.P/III/2008
Setia Bakti, Aceh Jaya 48
Floating raft/small-scale fishing/processing/trading
24 67.2 1.4 180%
11 SPK.4.2420/BRR-ETESP.ADB/VIII/2007
Meuraxa, Banda Aceh 44
Tuna powder processing 2.4 9.2 2.1 282%
12 SPK.5.3177/BRR-ETESP.ADB/IX/2007
Teluk Belukar, Nais 28
Small-scale fishing, ice freezers
14.0 28.0 1.0 100%
13
SPK.5.3181/BRR-ETESP.ADB/IX/2007
Fowa, Nias 21 Small-scale fishing 11.6 46.2 2.2 300%
14 SPK.5.3132/BRR-ETESP.ADB/IX/2007
Wau, Nias Selatan 24 Small-scale
fishing 43.2 151.2 0.5 233%
Sample totals 693 953 1,363.6 1.97 43%
Source: ADB ETESP site visits, December 2008
31
Some specific benefits recorded were as follows:
Rehabilitated or new smaller boats had been provided with replacement gear and in some cases small inboard engines. The boats (Groups 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, and 14) were able to restore their living, but with the new equipment, some were able to travel longer distances to sea. In these cases, all fishing groups (kelompoks) started re-investing in new gear, and were making of plans for replacement boats. In one case, in one case (Group 1), only some of the boats had been successful, causing the kelompok to fall apart, but within
this group 50% of the fishers were still successful. In all these cases, small-scale fishermen were partially dependent on their families to process fish and clean nets. In others, rehabilitated smaller boats in Nias and Nias Selatan (Groups12,13,14), had moved from subsistence coastal fishing to commercial hand lining for higher value species. Villagers, both men and women, in Teluk Belukar, Nias had used some of the community grant to buy chest freezers to supply the fishermen. This allowed the fishers to preserve high quality small tuna and groupers for sale in the main urban markets.
Picture of fishermen with net (Kelompok Bagi Beusaban) ‘We now share fishing costs and sell collectively to the Toke, which gives us stronger selling power’
Rehabilitated sampan (small boat) in Fowa village,
The small inboard engine (5.5 hp) now allows us to travel up to 6 miles offshore when before we fished only in the bay. (Teluk Belukar, Nias)
32
Fish processing has provided an economic activity for women (Groups 3 and 11). Community grants were able to draw in unemployed women from the village, train them and extend their processing to local sales to shops. One group (11) has secured export certificates for abon ikan to Malaysia, and has participated in a local business exhibition.
Fish trading has helped restore the traders’ livelihoods with baskets, fibre storage boxes, boots, knives and working capital (Groups 5, 8 and 10). The fish traders were able to use the working capital to establish themselves, reducing working capital debt liabilities, and found that the new facilities (fibre storage boxes) improved the quality of their fish, with some significant benefits in price. The other notable benefit was that the kelompok had agreed a selling network, thereby reducing competition, and would regularly hold joint meetings on prices and quality. Some traders had moved from bicycle to motorbike.
Other activities (Group 2) included small light boats that had been rehabilitated. These boats work at night with the purse seines catching small pelagic fish (ikan teri). They attract the fish and share one third of the catch with the boat. The group had seen a big increase in their earnings, the corresponding increasing dependency of the local fleet on light fishing, as their own catches had fallen.
Picture Fauzi Hasballah’s kelompok light boat ‘With the extra money that we are now making, we are rehabilitating older light boats, and expanding the kelompok’.
Lady processor salting fish, Samalanga Picture of lady processor (Ibu Nursadi) ‘The traders come to us, when before we were selling on the road side’ and ‘more women want to join our group’.
33
A summary of livelihood benefits recorded from the groups included:
• Increasing income; • More regular income; • Sending children to school; • Sustaining family expenditure to levels comparable with the rise in the cost of living; • Improved family diet (now 3 meals per day as opposed to the customary 2) ; • Decorating the house; • Resettlement in coastal community • Strengthening social linkages within the village; • Buying motor bikes • Investing in the kelompok assets.
Socialization
The kelompok structure had been retained in 12 out of the 14 cases examined. In 2 of these cases, the kelompoks had established a village cooperative, and another 5 villages were seeking to do the same.
The one problem case involved the selection of owners for three, two man boats from a group of 60. The issue was resolved by dividing the group into three sub kelompoks and a buyer chosen from within the group. The boats were bought at 50% of the original community grant and the monies distributed amongst the 19 family members.
34
Component performance
It is noted that the case studies represent a snap shot of working examples of kelompoks. In ETESP Site Advisers categorised the level of success in each district.
Table 4: Assessment by SA of BRR ADB ETESP village livelihoods grant performance.
Excellent (%)
Successful (%)
Partly successful (%)
Unsuccessful
(%) Total
Aceh Besar/Banda Aceh 24% 48% 20% 8% 100%
Pidie 12% 12% 12% 65% 100%
Bireuen 3% 3% 0% 94% 100%
Aceh Utara/Lhokseumawe 20% 80% 0% 0% 100%
Aceh Jaya 0% 71% 29% 0% 100%
Aceh Barat 15% 32% 26% 26% 100%
Simuelue 0% 21% 79% 0% 100%
Nias 16% 37% 37% 11% 100%
Nias Selatan 0% 25% 55% 20% 100%
Weighted average 10% 38% 26% 26% 100%
Source: ETESP Fisheries Site Advisors
Table 5: Summary of strengths, weaknesses and opportunities of BRR ADB ETESP village grants
Strengths Weaknesses
• Strong leadership skills from the kelompok group; • A willingness to coordinate amongst the villagers • Transparency in distribution of villager benefits • Adequate distribution of funds within the
kelompok, smaller kelompoks having a greater chance of success
• Good facilitation by ETESP staff, DIU and DKP • The provision of business training • The expansion of activities
Poor community facilitation
Poor community leadership
Divisions within the communities
Kelompoks too large
Failure to provide business support training
Opportunities Threats
• More flexibility on the size of grant depending on the number of beneficiaries (Rp 200million was too restrictive in some cases);;
• Real hands on facilitation using personnel with appropriate business development skills;
• Greater attention to ensuring that the kelompok leaders to have the required management skills
• As above, further mutual support and expansion of and within the kelompok
Village rivalries and jealousies (“the haves and have nots”).
35
Conclusions:
The planned project outcome for this component is: ‘Coastal communities empowered to develop and manage their resources’;
The following conclusions are made:
• 241 fisheries related kelompoks were empowered to develop and manage their resources;
• In 48 percent of cases the groups (Excellent and satisfactory), the kelompoks achieved the objective of restoring their livelihoods;
• In almost all number of cases, the kelompoks increased incomes, thereby reducing poverty;
• The size of village grant was in some cases too restrictive causing divisions within communities, and reducing the ability for some groups to optimize their performance; (but as a cash grant, the amount per person was actually quite high);
• The opportunities for enhanced kelompok performance were dependent on strong leadership, willingness for the villagers to accept the socialization process, and good guidance.
Table 6: BRR ADB ETESP Village Grant sub-component evaluation
High Successful Partly successful Unsuccessful Weighting
Relevance 3 20%
Effectiveness 2 30%
Efficiency 2 30%
Sustainability 2 20%
Overall rating 1.9 Successful
36
Sub component 2: Fishing boats
Summary of project outputs by economic activity
One hundred and forty one (141) fishing boats in the size range 5 – 20GT were delivered by BRR ADB ETESP to beneficiaries, along with support equipment (fishing nets, GPS, fish finders, lights and fish boxes), and first period operating costs. The value added generated as a result of ETESP fishing boat support sub component is an estimated Rp 4.5 billion (Table 7). The number of beneficiaries are 1,414, including 1,142 direct fisher beneficiaries, 24 upstream beneficiaries (boat builders), and 248 downstream workers, including 225 women workers, and 23 Toke Bangku (middlemen/boat agents). This excludes 347 boat builders and 30 net makers4 active during the construction period.
From a sample size of 59 boats, the projected annual (2008/2009) catch from these boats for would be 624 tons on the West coast and 300 tons on the East coast.
Table 7: Summary economic costs and benefits for BRR ADB ETESP fishing boats
Size group (GT)
Number Average cost
(Rp million)
NPV (Rp million) (12% discount
rate)
IRR (%)
Projected fleet annual value added (Rp million)
5-7 GT 88 135.6 9.973 14% 2425.56
10 GT 18 179.5 34.89 32% 644.94
15 GT 21 365.6 25.99 10% 806.4
20 GT 14 794.2 31.6 7% 627.2
Total 141 - - - 4,503.8
GT – gross tons Of the 141 boats completed, all were delivered within the period 2006 to 2008. Some problems were encountered with a small number of sub standard boats delivered by contractors which sub-contracted boat builders. In most cases, these issues were resolved following intervention from BBR Satker and ADB ETESP consultants.
Table 8: Summary beneficiaries for BRR ADB ETESP fishing boat construction
Fisher beneficiaries
Upstream5 Downstream6 Total
5-7 GT 349 14 108 471 10 GT 88 4 19 111 15 GT 425 3 87 515 20 GT 280 3 34 317 Total 1,142 24 248 1,414
4 The contractors also paid the fisher beneficiaries and other village members to prepare the nets prior to
operation. 5 Boat builders calculated in FTE to reflect rebuilding in 7 years. 6 Includes 225 direct women dependents
37
Case studies
Of the 25 boat projects, ETESP undertook an assessment of 10 kelompok groups operating. The evaluation examined five subject areas: economic (Table 9) outputs, validation of employment indicators (Table 7), livelihood benefits, sustainability, socialization processes and views on construction (Design, monitoring and delivery).
Economic and livelihood benefits
The results from the analysis reveal that beneficiary incomes have increased from pre tsunami levels by an average 9.9%, with fisher beneficiary average incomes of Rp 3.56 million/month.
Table 9: Case study of boat economic outputs
Group Contract number Location
No.
Be
nefic
iarie
s
Activity
Gro
up in
com
e /
mon
th p
re
tsun
ami
Gro
up in
com
e /
mon
th p
ost
tsun
ami
Av
inco
me/
bene
fici
ary % change
5-7 Gross Tons
1 SPK.S2.3792/BRR-ETESP.ADB/XII/2007
Arongan Lambalek & Meurebo,Aceh Jaya
8 Drifting gill net 16 28 3.5 75%
2 SPK.S.2.1190/BRR-ETESP.ADB/VI/2007
Samatiga, Aceh Barat 40 Drifting gill net 40 96 2.4 140%
3 SPK.S.2.1197/BRR-ETESP.ADB/VI/2007
Panga, Aceh Jaya 24 Drifting gill net 27 36 1.5 33%
4 SPK.S.2.1194/BRR-ETESP.ADB/VI/2007
Krueng Sabee, Aceh Jaya
24 Drifting gill net 9 26 1.1 192%
5 SPK.S.2.1195/BRR-ETESP.ADB/VI/2007
Teunom, Aceh Jaya
24 Drifting gill net 36 50.4 2.1 40%
6 PL.83.12/ETESP-DKP/IX/2006
Tuhemberua, Nias 15 Drifting gill net 8.25 16.5 1.0 100%
7 SPK.S.5.2572/BRR-ETESP.ADB/VIII/2007
Teluk Dalam and Lahusa, Nias Selatan
9 Drifting gill net 36.0 54.0 6.0 60%
8 SPK.S.5.2971/BRR-ETESP.ADB/VIII/2007
Teluk Dalam, Nias Selatan
9 Drifting gill net 13.5 22.5 2.5 51%
Average (5-7GT) 2.15 77%
10 Gross tons
9 SPK.S.2.1191/BRR-ETESP.ADB/VI/2007
Johan Pahlawan, Aceh Barat
40 Drifting gill net 111 164 4.1 47%
38
Group Contract number Location
No.
Be
nefic
iarie
s
Activity
Gro
up in
com
e /
mon
th p
re
tsun
ami
Gro
up in
com
e /
mon
th p
ost
tsun
ami
Av
inco
me/
bene
fici
ary % change
15 Gross tons 47%
10 SPK.S.2.2946/BRR-ETESP.ADB/X/2007
Muara Batu, Aceh Besar 80 Purse seine 140 112 1.4 -20%
20 Gross tons -20%
11 SPK.S.2.1186/BRR-ETESP.ADB/VI/2007
Kreung Raya/Lambado Lhoh, Aeh Besar
80 Purse seine 320 440 5.5 38%
12 SPK.S.2.1189/BRR-ETESP.ADB/VI/2007 Aceh Utara 80 Purse seine 120 90 1.1 -25%
13 SPK.S.2.1189/BRR-ETESP.ADB/VI/2007 Bireun 60 Purse seine 720 620 11.0 -8%
Average 387 397 5.9 +1%
Source: ADB ETESP site visits, December 2008. Note: Simeulue vessels were handed over in December2008/ January 2009. It was therefore not possible to include them in the survey
The results reflect significant benefits from increased catches for West Aceh and Island fishers, which the respondents dedicated to larger sized boats, increasing the range of smaller boats previously used; the application of technology (GPS and fish finders), allowing for night fishing; improvements in fish quality as a result of use of fish boxes; and application of different gears (drifting gill nets). The fishers reported that the extended range of the boats and the gears used resulted in a marked difference in fish caught. Boats were now targeting higher value Spanish mackerel, yellow fin tuna, groupers and snappers. The boats were reported to be more stable than their predecessors. All West Aceh, Nias and Nias Selatan boats reported profits, and most were considering longer term builds in newer, and in some cases, larger boats. All fishers had also bought additional gears (lines) to cater for seasonal changes in fisheries.
The East Aceh fishers, who were beneficiaries of larger 20 GT purse seiners made the following observations: In all but one boat, catches had consistently fallen by around 30%; at the same time, some fish prices had increased by around 20-60%. Overall, the increase in average incomes from pre tsunami levels was 1%. However, this marginal increase in earnings reflects the fact that two kelompoks ran into debt. All East coast kelompoks were seeking to redress the lower catch rate by investing in Fish Aggregation Devices (FADs).
In the intervening periods, some fishers had worked on other boats (in non-Tsunami affected Langsa and Iddie), smaller local boats or were unemployed.
39
Some specific cases are highlighted below:
Pak Jafar of Kelompok Setia Bakti, Aceh Jaya (5 GT boat) (Group 4), comprising 7 boats with 21 fishers, increased earnings by 192% from preceding activity. All had fished before the Tsunami but on smaller 2 man boats. They remarked that the kelompok functions well together: “We are now one big happy family’. We go to sea together for safety and share information like we never did before”. The boat is much safer than anything we had before. Fishing inshore is difficult because of obstructions, but we can now fish for longer and throughout the night. The Fish finder and GPS have helped us work in areas that we would never have worked before and we are catching valuable fish. They propose that with the profits made, the kelompok will build a new boat each year with the intention that each crewman becomes a ‘Pawang’ (Skipper). “Our boats are the envy of the village”.
Pak Jafar ID, Sektia Bakti, Aceh Jaya: We are now one big happy family’. We go to sea together for safety and share information like we never did before
Kelompok Sama Tiga, Aceh Barat (5 GT boat) (Group 2), comprising 8 boats with 40 fishers, increased earnings by 140% from preceding activities. We can travel further and sell at distant markets (Lampolu). The kelompok functions well, but most importantly we are able to educate our families
Pak Nawawi, Johan Pahlawan (5 GT boat) (Group 6), Aceh Barat. Our catches are better with the new gill nets. We catch more high value fish which brings each of us earnings of Rp 1.5 million per trip (in 7 days). With this money, I have bought my wife a sewing machine, and myself a motor bike. We are now thinking of the years ahead, and safe Rp 200 000 / trip for a ne boat
40
Pak Amaruddin Ismael, Muara Batu, Aceh Utara (15 GT boat). Our catches have fallen by 30% from when we were fishing before the Tsunami, but we are grateful to ADB because we have moved from no work to now providing for our families. Times were very difficult after the Tsunami, and we had to rely on friends for support. Some of us were forced to work in Iddie so that we could keep our children at school, but can now return home to be with our families. We are now borrowing FADs from the Toke which will allow us to increase catches.
Pak Beji seki Nech. Desa Hilitobara, Nias Selatan. ADB supplied drifting gill nets, when we had traditionally used bottom long lines all year. This allowed us to diversify our catching in the ‘East season’. Our catch in this period changed to more tunas and flying fish, but our overall income for the period increased. We are now saving Rp 1million / month for a new boat.
Pak Idris Ismael, Panta Raja, Pidie. Our catches have fallen because of a change in sea conditions. The weather seems to be rougher than previous years. Each boat operates as its own kelompok but we share information with the other boats, and fisher together. Nevertheless, we are grateful to ADB, some of us were unemployed.
The evaluation also identified 3 out of 14 20GT purse seine boats that had fallen into serious debt. These were from Suenadon and Lampaga7 (Aceh Utara). The delays were a combination of poor quality boats supplied by the contractor, a series of 3 poor fishing trips and rising debts. The three sub kelompoks decided to fix the problems on the boat. All had run up debts of Rp 100 million to the Toke. One of these boats was under the Pawang’s control but fishing from Lhoksemawe, another was fishing with the same sub-kelompok, but operating from Iddie, and the other had been surrendered to the Toke. Of the remaining 11 boats, 1 was operating successfully from Peudada, another was following the tuna shoals around North Aceh, but was reporting successful catches and good earnings, One boat was laid up in Jangka awaiting repairs, but there was a dispute between the kelompok beneficiaries and other members of the village. Eight other boats had been handed over (Lhoksemawe, Kreung Raya and Lambada Lhok) to the kelompok but were awaiting the operating expenses before starting fishing. The Pawang of these boats reported that they were happy with the ADB package, but there were some deficiencies in finishing which had been reported to BRR Satker. 7 Contract SPK.S.2.1188/BRR-ETESP.ADB/VI/2007
Catch of Hilitobara boa, Nias
41
A summary of livelihood benefits recorded from the groups included:
• Increasing income for fishers and other beneficiaries; • Fishers able to return to the village from distant fishing ports; • Generating income for spouses (through further fish processing and drying) • Sending children to school; • Improved family diet; • Strengthening social linkages within the village; • Donating to the mosque or church • Buying household items that can support alternative livelihoods • Buying motor bikes • Investing in the kelompok assets.
Socialisation
When asked about the socialization process in forming the kelompok, fishers, and their Panglima Lhok explained that meetings had taken place within the village, to decide on kelompok members. In all cases, the villagers selected disadvantaged fishers, and unemployed village members, and there were no identified cases of jealousies or rivalries. In one subsequent and isolated case, Jeunib, Jangka, the villagers had sought to seek ownership of the boat as opposed to the kelompok. The boat is presently laid up awaiting a resolution to the problem.
The positive lesson learned is that fishers appeared to have retained the kelompok structure as an entity to business operations. Most groups created a sub-kelompok linked to each boat. One group (Setia Bakti) had retained a joint kelompok of 7 boats.
Sustainability
West coast and Island fishing boats were achieving high catches. The increase in catch is attributed by the fishers to the ADB package allowing them to fish more efficiently. The BRR
Two of the 20 east coast purse seiners Small 5GT boats ready to set sail for
42
ADB ETSP has resulted in a transition from heavily exploited inshore waters to near shore. This may have increased the pressure of certain near shore stocks such as snapper, groupers, mackerels and tuna. Pre- and post-Tsunami DKP boat statistics are very unreliable and it is difficult to gauge the sizes of the fleets pre and post tsunami. However, it is known that much of the initial reconstruction efforts in West Aceh were focused on construction of smaller boats. The expectation is that if anything, effort may have increased significantly in inshore waters and BRR ADDB ETESP assistance provided an opportunity to diversify to under exploited grounds.
In contrast, East Aceh has seen a reduction in fish catches. This may be as a result of many factors. However, observations from the evaluation, indicates that other donors were also active in the area. This may have led to an increase in capacity in some of the East Aceh landing sites. In Pante Raja, Pidie, 4 donors (including ADB) were active, and the size of the fleet increased from pre tsunami 40 boats to 52. A worrying sign from a conservation perspective is the focus on fish aggregating devices (FAD) to target tunas. IOTC has expressed concern over the use of FADs.
Boat Design, construction and delivery processes
The case studies provide a good indication of performance in the boat design, construction and handover process. The view of respondents was also clarified with the experiences of the Site Advisors and boat monitors. The table below represents a summary of collective views, identifying where appropriate, the specific issues raised by the respondents.
Table 10: Assessment of BRR ADB ETESP boat design, construction and delivery
Design Construction Handover/Delivery Comments
Aceh Besar Excellent Successful (1) Partly successful (2)
(1) Some faults in finishing (Weak decking, caulking and wood quality);
(2) Awaiting operating costs
Pidie Successful (3) Successful Successful (1) Boat specifications built
with smaller capacity from other in the village
Bireun Successful (3) Successful (4) Successful (1) Problem with one boat delivered in Jangka
Aceh Utara/Lhokseumawe Successful
Partly Successful (5) (6)
Partly Successful (5)
(1) Problems experienced with three out of boats 9. Visits restricted to two only, and boats were not distinguishable by beneficiary until very late in the process
(2) Replacement of keels in Muara Batu
Aceh Jaya Excellent Successful (7) Successful (7) (8)
(1) Problems encountered with specific contractors and boat yards in Calang and Teunom
(2) Awaiting operating costs
Aceh Barat Excellent Excellent Excellent No faults detected by beneficiaries
Nias Excellent Excellent Excellent No faults detected by beneficiaries
Nias Selatan Excellent Excellent Excellent
Problems were experienced with vessels originally built in Calang. The interviews covered vessels built in P Tello. No faults detected by beneficiaries
Rating Successful Successful (2) Successful (2)
43
(2.6)
Source: ADB ETESP site visits, December 2008. Note Average scores greater than 1.6 and less than 2.9 are classified as ‘Successful’.
Problem issues identified by respondents related to contractor delivery of poorly finished boats. BRR ADB ETESP subsequently insisted on successful sea trials prior to the handover. However, for the most part most beneficiaries in each District felt that the process had been successful. The difficulty in the above definition is that generally successful performances were tarnished by a few specific cases.
Component performance
Table 11: summary of strengths weaknesses and opportunities of BRR ADB ETESP boat construction
Strengths Weaknesses
• Boat construction processes regarded as ‘as excellent, in terms of design, mostly successful in terms of construction and design;
• Strong economic performance by fishing boats, especially in the 5-7 GT group, leading to certainty of longer term sustainability;
• Significant economic and livelihood benefits; • Socialisation / kelompok processes appears to
have been highly successful; • Few boats experienced changes in ownership /
kelompok membership since commencing operations.
• Poor quality control applied by some contractors; • Some concerns about fully exploited stocks in
some areas • Weaknesses in donor/NGO/DKP boat construction
coordination by coordinating authority; • Need for stronger dialogue and site demarcation
between donors and NGOs; • Operating grants were not successful in reducing
the linkages between intermediaries and beneficiaries. However, this relationship is a traditional and generally non exploitative process in Aceh
• A small number of fishes fell into debt and relied on the toke as opposed to other credit schemes to support them
Opportunities Threats
• BRR Satker/DKP strategic assessment of boat needs pre tsunami
• Improved boat monitoring by beneficiaries and monitors;
• Rigorous controls and strict penalties applied to contractor non performance;
• DKP focus on gradual reduction in boat numbers, and evaluation of alternative livelihoods such as aquaculture.
• Design of credit schemes to reduce dependency on middlemen
• As and when boats default they become vulnerable to take over;
• Stock depletion with increases in efficiency of fishing boats post delivery (e.g. use of FADs).
Conclusions:
The project outcomes for this component is ‘Capture fisheries restored to biologically and economically sustainable levels of effort and landings’;
The following conclusions are made:
44
• 141 fishing boats and 1,414 beneficiaries have benefitted from this subcomponent; • fisheries kelompoks have been empowered to develop and manage their own resources; • The boats are economically viable, and in most cases have contributed to a significant
reduction in poverty levels and a strengthening in family livelihoods; • The sub component is sustainable with beneficiaries considering gradual re-investment
strategies. This also suggests that the boat packages, with accompanying inputs, were successful;
• The impact on the resources is unknown suggesting that DKP together with Panglima Laot needs to evaluate precautionary fisheries management strategies
• The boat construction processes was successful, with limited problems experienced with contractor performance
• Stronger donor coordination and consultation was needed during the period of beneficiary identification
• The socialisation processes worked well
Table 12: BRR ADB ETESP fishing vessel construction sub component evaluation
High Successful Partly successful Unsuccessful Weighting
Relevance 3 20%
Effectiveness 2 30%
Efficiency 2 30%
Sustainability 3 20%
Overall rating 2.4 Successful
Sub component 3: Aquaculture
Summary of project outputs by economic activity
By the end of 2008, five thousand farmers and other community stakeholders had received assistance from ADB grants. Sixty four per cent of community grants were to tambak farmers, based in the Northern and Eastern districts of Bireuen, Aceh Utara and Pidie. Other beneficiaries included 48 shrimp hatcheries, located in the North eastern districts, 344 small scale Crab/Lobster/Milkfish fattening groups spread throughout Aceh, and other smaller scale community farmer groups on the West coast, comprising 42 tilapia community groups and 68 islands community groups (58 grouper and 10 seaweed groups). In the case of shrimp farms and hatcheries, ADB support was given to the restoration and improved practices, whilst other groups benefitted in part from restoration but more in the establishment of new alternative livelihoods.
The value added generated as a result of ETESP aquaculture support sub component is an estimated Rp 15.5 billion (Table 13). The number of beneficiaries (Table 13) are 5,619, including 522 upstream and downstream beneficiaries (input suppliers and middlemen). Women workers do not feature significantly in aquaculture activities, with the exception of seaweed, where they make up more than half of the total labour force.
The sample of beneficiaries per are summarized in Table 14.
45
Table 13: Summary economic costs and benefits for BRR ADB ETESP aquaculture
Size group Number of units (1 unit = 1 farm)
No farmer of beneficiaries
Average cost ha / unit
(Rp million)
NPV (Rp million) (12% discount rate)
IRR (%)
Projected sector annual value added (Rp million)
Tons produced
Farms /cages
Shrimp/milkfish tambak (3 cycles)
3,159 3,159
22.78
9.7 44% 3,806
Shrimp 450 t
Milkfish: 9,685 t
Grouper (2 cycles) 58 317 33.7
285 378% 432
70
Grouper nursery 1 5 52.05 6.5 164% 5.5
Tilapia 42 534 35.3 389.4 334% 722 396
Crab/Lobster/Milkfish fattening and nurseries
344 886 4.7 5.6 87% 123
Seaweed (8 cycles) 10 129 3.61 4.023 91% 100 29.7 (dried weight)
Total 3,614 5,030 152 700 3,921
Hatcheries
Number of units
No farmer of beneficiaries
Average cost / unit
(Rp million)
NPV (Rp million) (12% discount rate)
IRR (%)
Projected annual hatchery annual value added (Rp million)
Shrimp hatcheries 48 48 166.4
40.8 16% 1,071.0
Grouper hatcheries 2 19 100.09 5,445 40% 4,015.0
8 Includes agro-input 9 Supported National ABN budget of Rp 3,950 million (BBIP Busung) and Rp 1,250 million (BBIP, Fino)
46
Total 50 67 266.4 585.3 5,086.0
Grand total 3,664 5,097 418 1,285 0 15,451
47
Table 14: Summary beneficiaries for BRR ADB ETESP aquaculture
Farmer and farm workers
Upstream Input suppliers
Downstream (Toke) Number of women engaged
Total
Farms
Shrimp / milkfish tambak
3,159 112 157 3,428
Grouper 317 23 40 340
Grouper nursery 5 Farmers already listed
5
Tilapia 534 18 552
Crab/Lobster 886 25 911
Seaweed 129 4 100 133
Total 5,030 122 207 140
Hatchery
Shrimp 48 48 Tambak farmers and toke already
listed
96
Grouper 19 5 24
Total 67 53 120
Table 15: Case study of BRR ADB ETESP aquaculture economic indicators
Group Location No. Beneficiaries
Activity kgs/per cycle
Group income / cycle pre tsunami
Group income / cycle post tsunami
Av income/beneficiary
% change
Shrimp
milkfish
1 Bireun 322 Shrimp tambak
93 1,039
Rp 231m Rp 391m Rp 1.2 m
-69%
2 Aceh Utara 587 22 220
Na Rp (25 m) Rp (44 m)
na
48
Group Location No. Beneficiaries
Activity kgs/per cycle
Group income / cycle pre tsunami (Rp m)
Group (gross) income / cycle post tsunami (Rp M)
Av income/beneficiary
% change
Jasa Maju
Desa Cot Kumbang, Kecamatan Arongan, Kabupaten Aceh Barat
20 Tilpia 3.540 0
30,7 1,5 NA
Bersatu Balefadorotuho, Kec. Lahewa, Nias
6 Grouper 700 0 52.5 2,5
Saban Rasa
Pasi Lhok, Kecamatan Kembang Tanjong, Kabupaten Pidie
3 Sea bass 1,100 16,5 0.9
Duta Bahari
Balefadorotuho Nias 20 10 0 0.25 0.0125
Ikan Todak
Bawolawinda Nias Selatan 11 300 0 7.5 0.68
Group Location No. Beneficiaries
Activity PL/per cycle (million)
Group income / cycle pre tsunami
Group income / cycle post tsunami
Av income/beneficiary
% change
Bukhari Windu
Alue Mangki, Kecamatan Gandapura, Kabupaten Bireuen
4 Shrimp hatchery
5.0 6.0 61,2 9.18 +53%
Case studies
Of the 3,159 tambaks ETESP had assisted in rehabilitation, ETESP undertook an assessment of 18 tambak groups (1,000 individual tambaks) in Aceh Utara and Bireuen, 1 hatchery in Bireuen, 1 grouper, 1 tilapia, 1 sea bass and 2 seaweed kelompoks. The evaluation examined five subject areas: economic outputs, validation of employment indicators, livelihood benefits, sustainability, socialization processes and views on construction (Design, monitoring and delivery).
Economics and livelihood benefits
Shrimp tambaks
The benefit following ADB ETESP assistance to shrimp tambaks was not only the restoration of the tambaks but also, improvement in productivity over the pre-tsunami production levels. Using BMP advice, farmers cited increasing yields of shrimp per cycle from pre tsunami
49
levels of 80 kg/ha to up to 300 kg/ha. The general trend has been an increase in shrimp volume produced by 40%. More notable successes were found in milkfish production, which had increased from 300kg/ha to around 1,400/ha. Farmers cited increased stocking densities, improved feeding regimes and quality testing of PL as the key reasons for improvement in production volumes. Farmers acknowledge that their incomes have increased with a transition from 2 to 3 cycles per annum but shrimp prices are lower now than they were before the tsunami.
As a result of the support and record what they say e.g Pak Suliman,kelompok udang bagus ‘we are now producing 150 kgs per cycle, my income is better and I can now afford to buy without borrowing from the toke bangku’
BMPs were cited has having improved farmer knowledge of the production processes. Farmers commented that they were regularly testing pH and salinity as well as monitoring for signs of disease. Farmers were restocking after 3 months, when they had previously waited 5 to 6 months. However, farmers still relied on the seed from toke bangku, as opposed to specific hatcheries, including those built by ADB ETESP. They cited concerns over water compatibility between the farm and hatchery as a reason for relying on their traditional toke linkages.
Other economic benefits cited were:
• Farmers had increased their levels of activity and were renting tambaks from others; • Removed reliance on capital purchases from the toke; • Improved transparency in prices offered because
A summary of livelihood benefits recorded from the shrimp farmer groups included:
• Partial increases in income had allowed farmers to send their children to at least one higher level; • Farmers felt that their status in the villages had improved, along with their ability to provide shrimp/milkfish for their neighbours and friends.
Aquaculture Livelihood support activities (Tilapia, grouper and others)
Both grouper and tilapia are seen as having generated a good source of additional income for community groups, but in some cases (tilapia), the outputs failed to reach their real production potential, producing around 30% to 50%. Nevertheless anecdotal evidence suggests that some tilapia groups are doing better than others citing particular success stories for tilapia in Setia Bakti and Panga. The lack of income for the group would appear to have resulted in the group sizes falling to half their original level.
Grouper would appear to have been a more successful venture than tilapia with community groups receiving up to Rp 2.5 million per member per cycle. This activity has generated higher incomes per beneficiary than most other activities.
Seaweed
There were contrasting experiences in seaweed cultivation. Table 3 showing the range of success experienced between the villages. Bawolawinda, Pulau Telo (Nias Selatan)
50
provides a good working example where farmers realised around Rp 7.5 million from the one cycle. This money was put into the community cash fund for re-investment. In contrast, Balefadorotuho failed to realise any appreciable earnings. On the whole, it can be said that the experiences of Nias Selatan were satisfactory, whilst those in Nias were poor, largely as a result of conflicts and poor organisation within the villages, compounded by an ‘ice-ice’ and moss attack. Early successful activities were in the sale of seed to other sites (BRR ADB ETESP and ADB COREMAP). Seed prices reached very high levels of Rp 25,000/kg.
There were 129 beneficiaries from seaweed activities. Women account for more than half the workforce and play a significant role within the production and marketing structure. The women were actively involved in construction, culture/planting (especially in tightening the seeds), and periodically cleaning the seaweeds. The women will also become involved in the post-harvest handling and up to marketing as and when the production systems are fully implemented.
Hatcheries
Hatchery producers would appear to be producing approximately 5 million PL per cycle, which represents a 40% increase over and above pre tsunami activities. More importantly, owner, and other beneficiary income, has increased as result of improved production, better prices and a reduction on operating costs (as a result of the introduction of a single brooder system). BRR ADB ETESP has also provided training in disease checking procedures, and sustainability is supported with ongoing biosecurity technical assistance provided by Ujung Bate.
Socialization
Shrimp tambaks
When asked about the socialization process in forming the kelompok, the feedback was mixed. Some farmers expressed satisfaction that group structures had improved relationships between farmers, and had allowed for collective purchasing from suppliers. However, in other cases it was stressed that the formation of the groups had been in haste in order to facilitate access to BRR ADB ETESP support. This had led to disquiet among group members with the selection of specific leaders who were deemed insufficiently trustworthy. The Dea of Jangka Alue U had changed their group management, after tambak reconstruction and received improved performance from the new group leadership, which facilitated agro-input distribution.
Aquaculture Livelihood support activities (Tilapia, grouper and others)
The socialisation experience was mixed across other livelihood aquaculture activities. The grouper groups would appear to have worked well as a community, but are said to require more advice to facilitate longer term sustainability. The tilapia groups did not appear to work well with activities undertaken by a few individuals as opposed to the group as a whole. The other livelihood support activities (fattening) would appear to have mixed experiences.
Seaweed
With one exception, village groups worked well. Farmers often worked together to resolve problems. In Teluk Limo, the group was able to work together to construct a longline unit to
51
replace the failed bottom planting method. However, conflict within groups occurred due to weak community facilitation and lack of information. In Balogia Village there were two managers within the group because of lack of trust but this issue was resolved through group dynamics and a change in management structure.
Sustainability
Shrimp tambaks
Farmers had placed a strong focus on restocking with an increased number of cycles per annum, showing commitment to increasing production. The extremely good returns from milkfish had probably improved their financial security, as opposed to shrimp, which has suffered from poor international product prices. Farmers also indicated a lower reliance on middlemen to support capital purchases, but this may also be because most farmers’ primary capital inputs were supported by BRR ADB ETESP Fisheries agro input grants. These assets would still appear to be functioning well.
Aquaculture Livelihood support activities
Most systems would appear to be sustainable, but the slow initiation of training for tilapia farmers has resulted in an inability to realise full production potential in this sector. Areas cited as important for training are disease control, crop husbandry (Feeding and environmental control), net repairs and construction and marketing. Training in disease management is also cited as an important issue for the grouper sector.
Seaweed
Based on collective decision-making, seven of the ten villages target villages have given their commitment to continue the implementation: Balefadorotuho, Seriwau Daratan, Bawo Analita Saeru, Teluk Lomo, Bawolawinda, Balogia and Hiligeho Sugawa. The three Nias villages appear likely to discontinue their activities. Of the committed villages, the farmers retain a strong commitment to provide seeds to other target villages, even supplying free seed where the village (Balogia) encountered problems. The internal dynamics has seen seeds exchanged between all the participating villages.
The producers have also established links with a private Jakarta based producer (PT Gumindo Perkasa Industri) who appear committed to strengthening the trading linkages with the ETESP and ADB COREMAP sites.
Hatcheries
Sustainability seems assured with improved profitability and sustainability is supported by ongoing biosecurity technical assistance provided by Ujung Bate.
Design, construction and delivery processes
Shrimp tambaks
The socialisation and technical training support processes on tambak reconstruction empowered the farmers ability to monitor the work during tambak reconstruction. However, in a large number of cases, farmers expressed distrust of their group leadership preferring to
52
have received direct financial benefit from BRR ADB ETESP. Farmers also expressed satisfaction with the performance of the contractors.
It was acknowledged that programme staff were on hand to support the design and implementation of the rehabilitation activities, but farmers felt that there was confusion between DIU, SA and other support staff over implementation rules. In this respect it was stressed that there was an inadequate hierarchy for decision-making.
Aquaculture Livelihood Support Activities
The livelihood groups were responsible for the construction of their own facilities. This appears to have been competed to the satisfaction of the SA and technical experts.
Seaweed
Design issues seem to appear to have departed from the original recommendations of line systems, with the trainers advocating bottom systems. The seed budget was allegedly insufficient, compounded by the need to obtain more seeds to cater for the restoration process following ‘ice ice’ disease thought to originate from contact with freshwater.
Hatcheries
Hatchery construction followed a pre agreed design, and DIU supervised and ADB ETESP closely monitored implementation.
Table 15: Assessment of BRR ADB ETESP fish farm design, construction and delivery
Case study Design Construction Handover/Delivery
Comments
Calok
Good Successful Successful The design unclear boundary of village
Jangka Alue U
Successful Partly successful Successful
There are about 2 farmers are not satisfied, less supervise/monitoring from ADB/BRR directly to the field.
Other non shrimp activities Successful Successful Successful
Work was undertaken by the groups concerned
Seaweed
Parttly successful Successful Successful
Seaweed trainers advocated a change to bottom systems which proved unsuccessful
Shrimp hatcheries Successful Successful Successful
Completed according to design specifications
Component performance
Table 16: summary of strengths weaknesses and opportunities of BRR ADB ETESP boat construction
Strengths Weaknesses
Farmer beneficiaries were identified without The socialization processes were not seen to work well (Shrimp, tilapia), with considerable mistrust of the leadership
53
problems.
Design studies (shrimp) (Map, BoQ, and Technical Drawing) were of good quality.
BMPs were designed and implemented and worked well (shrimp)
The level of continuous support (SA, DIU) were perceived as good
Some socialization processes led to increased bargaining power for farmers
Seaweed socialization appears to have worked well in 9 of the 10 seaweed villages and for grouper culture
Women were actively engaged in nursery, line construction and seeding adding to the success of the seaweed operations
and haste in the creation of group structures.
The support structures to facilitate good group organisation were inadequate.
The field staff (DIU, SA, Bina Swadaya) were unclear on the rules for implementation, and support staff roles were unclear
Its was felt that ADB activities were too widespread and more resources could have been put into fewer sites
Training has been lacking for some groups (fattening and tilapia) with the result that production systems have not reached their full potential.
Disease problems encountered in seaweed cultivation
Some members of the group were lazy and became passive members causing some internal conflicts.
Opportunities Threats
Much greater attention and time paid to the socialization process
Better management control, required during implementation
No training or inadequate training may affect the sustainability of some activities (tilapia)
Conclusions:
The following conclusions are made:
• The farmers reacted well to the training processes and the BMPs for shrimp, and seaweed. Framers therefore appear highly likely to implement improved practices with the resulting benefits for domestic food security (milkfish) and with good export potential for shrimp and possibly seaweed;
• However, training has been lacking for some groups (tilapia) creating significant problems for longer term sustainability;
• More attention should have been paid to the socialization structure which proved problematic due to inadequate organization and supervision, with the processes rushed in order to facilitate fast access to rehabilitation funding;
• Farmers appeared capable of supervising tambak reconstruction, but the quality and confusion of higher level supervisory support was seen as problematic. Farmers commented that greater should have been paid to the establishment of a management hierarchy with defined rules for implementation.
• As and when farmers (grouper, tilapia and seaweed) implemented their own constructions, these appear to have been adequately completely.
54
Table 17: BRR ADB ETESP aquaculture sub component evaluation
High Successful Partly successful Unsuccessful Weighting
Relevance 3 20%
Effectiveness 2 30%
Efficiency 2 30%
Sustainability 3 20%
Overall rating 2.5 Successful
Sub component 4: Infrastructure
Summary of project outputs by economic activity
By the end of 2008, forty four (44) assets were delivered by BRR ADB ETESP to beneficiaries (Table 18), with a projected number of beneficiaries per asset. Table 19 takes a more detailed look at the distinction between target beneficiaries and actual beneficiaries based on evaluation assessment. The estimate total number of beneficiaries recorded for this sub component is 8,258.
Table 18: Summary economic costs and benefits for BRR ADB ETESP infrastructure investments
Size group (GT) Number Average cost (Rp million)
NPV (Rp million) IRR (%) Target beneficiaries
Landing site/Jetty 18 1,098.9 4,208 Fish market 3 553 518 Ice plant 4 937.4 15.0 15% 1,311 SPDN 9 365.3 49.0 32%
2,173 BBM 3 290.8 117.0 126% Cool dry room 1 133.4 1,418 Refrigerated ice lorry 1 525.0 308 Revetment 2 1,654.2 2,608
Total 44 - - -
55
Table 19: Summary beneficiaries for BRR ADB ETESP infrastructure (SC 4) construction
Activity Target beneficiaries
Actual beneficiaries
No of local
fishermen
Visiting vessels (FTE)10
Fish traders
Processing Workers Total
Johan Palawan
Wall 1,024 500 150 200 20 870
Ujung Drien TPI 408 630 15 5 650
Arongan L TPI 108 69 15 4 88
Teunom TPI 416 319 - 7 326
Panga TPI 200 237 2 239
Kreun Sabee SPDN/Fish market/ refrigerated ice lorry
120 318 20 3 10 351
Leupung TPI 744 206 15 53 274
Lambada Lhok
SPDN/Fish market 241 160 7 167
Pante Raja Cool dry room 1,418 780 30 75 885
Mereudu SPDN 2,160 300 50 30 380
Jangka Small pier 780 98 5 103
Samalanga TPI 1,192 300 10 18 328
Pusong SPDN not stated 250 30 35 10 325
Plimbang TPI 220 200 6 206
Rancong TPI 200 200 7 207
Muara Batu Ice plant/SPDN 1,304 400 30 10 16 456
Seunudoon TPI 1,316 60 7 67
Kota Batu Ice plant 404 75 12 3 5 95
Latak Ayah TPI/BBM 404 62 24 3 7 96
10 FTE = person days
56
Suka Karya TPI/BBM 744 120 48 12 20 200
Labuhan Bajau
TPI/BBM 520 83 10 4 7 104
Gunung Sitoli Ice plant not stated 55 20 9 81 165
Lahusa BBM 250 250 75 10 335
Tuhemberua BBM 170 170 30 15 215
Teluk Dalam Ice plant not stated 500 100 10 66 676
P Tello Jetty 450 360 55 15 30 450
Total TPI/Wall/Jetty 3444 317 298 159 4,208
Total SPDN/BBM 1,713 287 112 61 2,173
Fish market 478 20 3 17 518
Total Ice plant 1,030 162 32 87 1,311
Total Other 780 0 30 75 885
Overall total All11 8,258
Source: ADB ETESP site visits, December 2008
The infrastructure activities also support other BRR ADB ETESP activities, e.g. landing sites, and the provision of fuel for fishing vessels, ice for fishers and fish traders, and inland markets for assisted traders (muge)
BRR ADB ETESP landing site construction has benefitted 4,208 fishers and support workers (traders and processors). This excludes 360 site workers responsible for construction in the period 2006-2008. The expected economic benefits resulting from this activity are as follows:
• Improved access to fishing boats for discharging fish; • covered markets for the protection of fish from sunlight; • market premises for fish trading; • Improved product quality and price; • hall facilities to support net mending; • hall facilities to support meetings; • integration with other infrastructure activities
BRR ADB ETSEP SPDN/BBM has benefitted 2,173 fishers. This excludes 240 site workers responsible for construction in the period 2006-2008.The economic benefits from this activity include:
• the provision of fuel at lower cost; • Increase in the quality of fuel available; • Ease of access to fuel;
11 Not sum of above totals to avoid double counting
57
• the profit from activities to the kelompok/cooperative responsible for running the fuel stations.
BRR ADB ETSEP ice plants have benefitted 1,311 fishers. This excludes 20 site workers responsible for construction in the period 2006-2008. The economic benefits from this activity include:
• the provision of ice at lower cost; • ease of access to ice; • the profit from activities to the kelompok/cooperative responsible for running the fuel
stations
The Province’s ice had traditionally been supplied by private entrepreneurs distributing from the main locations, Banda Aceh, Sigli, Bireun, Lhokseumawe and Meulaboh. In many cases there is a gap in the cold chain, or significant loss of ice during transport. In some cases, fishers will opt not to use ice resulting in fish deterioration.
BRR ADB ETSEP fish markets have benefitted 518 traders and fishermen. This excludes 40 site workers responsible for construction in the period 2006-2008. The expected economic benefits resulting from this activity are as follows:
• Improved access to consumers to fish; • Improved product quality, and price • covered markets for the protection of fish from sunlight; • market premises for fish trading; • integration with other infrastructure activities in the village (e.g. ice plants)
Case studies
Economic and livelihood benefits
Landing sites: At the time of the evaluation (End of November), only one landing site, Ujung Drien (Aceh Barat), had been handed over. More sites had been completed but were awaiting ‘hand over’ from BRR Satker. The community had started activities at one other site, Samalanga (Bireun), but some facilities were still locked and awaiting the keys from DKP. Some observations from these two sites were noted: Apart from domestic activity, the landing sites were being used by both domestic fishermen and other non community fishers, from outside the region. Ujung Drien was being used by fishers from Calang; Samalanga by fishers from Lhokseumawe.
Fishers used the landing sites for net repairs. There was no evidence of fishers using the facilities to discharge fish. The reason for this is that in both cases, there was no management structure in place,
nor management MoU between the community and DKP. ETESP NACA consultants have subsequently followed up on this issue at many sites
Fishermen using the ADB ETESP meeting hall in Samalanga
58
SPDN and BBMs: None of the SPDNs had been completed by the end of 2008. One site, Muara Batu, was almost complete and a cooperative manager appointed. However, it was awaiting a license from Pertamina (the franchise fuel supplier from the national fuel monopoly).Two other sites Lambado Lhok and Pusong were nearing completion, but license issues were also believed to be problematic. The fishers however, were happy with these facilities identifying with the above economic advantages.
We estimate that cooperative members will save 20% of fuel costs. We were always relying on motor bikes bringing fuel. This meant that we would have to pay higher rates and pay the transport charge. Amaruddin Ismael, Pawang for one of ETESP’s fishing boats
The BBM is a new site, when before came from Gunung Sitoli, 50 miles away. We expect to sell 2.5 tons per day to 50 boats in the surrounding villages and make a 20% profit on sales .But most important is the quality of fuel. Before supplies from Sitoli were contaminated with kerosene, this damaged the engines. Now we know that everyone will want our fuel because it will be clean; Pak Yaarojai, nominated manager, BBM, Tuhemberua
Of the four ADB ETESP ice plants, one is nearing operation. The ice plant at Muara Batu will support a fleet of 30 vessels in the village, and is complimentary to other infrastructure activities (BRR ADB ETESP SPDN and DKP TPI) and fishing vessel construction and community grants (muge traders) in the area. The plant has been tested to operate at a capacity of 5 tonnes a day. A manager had been appointed by the Community, and operators and technicians were about to receive training from ETESP. However, the beneficiaries were awaiting hand over from BRR Satker. Beneficiaries, Mohammed (muge Kelompok Perikanan Gampong Mns Baro) commented ‘the ice will allow our fish to remain fresh for longer, with this we get a
Photo: Ice plant, Muara Batu benefitting BRR ADB ETESP assisted fishers and Muge.
Photo: Muara Batu SPDN
Pangkalan BBM (Fuel depot) in Botolakha village in Tuhemberua, Nias.
59
higher price, and can travel to more distant markets’.
60
The Calang Fish market is the only market that has been formerly handed over. It is now run by the local API traders association.
The Calang fish market is now operational with 12 work stations. The traders previously worked in an old market, destroyed by the Tsunami. The new Pasar Ikan is modern and much better than what we had before with muddy floors and poor working tables. Before we stayed open for four hours, now we start at 6 am and stay until 3 pm.
Our fish is better, and housewives prefer buying fish here than in the old market. Pak Muslim API Chairman. He continued. Each vendor pays a maintenance fee of Rp 200,000 / month, and with this we can clean the market. Competition for the tables was fierce, and in fact the market was too small.
Pre selection Design and management
ETESP evaluated the state of use pre tsunami (Table 20), the level of community supports with a view to identifying critical issues to be resolved by Satker. The tests the presumption that BRR ADB ETESP’s outcome is Small-scale fisheries landing and post harvest facilities restored.
The following observations are made:
• Most sites were active before the Tsunami. ADB ETESP has improved the facilities for local fishers and traders;
• Community support for these facilities is high, with one exception. Plimbang; • Utilisation of some sites is contained by access issues. The estuaries require
dredging in 5 of the 18 landing site location (Arongan, Panga, Samalanga, Plimbang, Seunuddon);
• In some cases there is community resistance to handover until access issues are resolved (Panga, Plimbang, Seunuddon);
• BBMs represent a new facility (Nias and Nias Selatan). The provision of on site fuel is likely to make a price savings of around 20%, and to improve the quality of fuel available to the vessels.
Photo: Fish Market (Pasar Ikan), Calang
Traders at Calang fish market.
61
Table 20: Site activity, completion, support and observations from selected sample of infrastructure sites
Pre tsunami activity
Complimented by other infrastructure support facilities
State of completion
Community support and observations
Landing site
Ujung Drien Boats would moor on the bank.
ADB Fishing kelompok/community grants 100%
Strong support as a birthing and net mending station. but no active trading. Boats sell fish in neighbouring Johan Palawan
Arongan L Small landing jetty, no covered market
None 100% Support, but small fisher grouping (88). Estuary access is problematic, but just navigable.
Teunom Boats would moor on the bank
ADB Fishing kelompok/community grants
40% Strong support with active trading.
Panga Previously landed on the beach
Community grants 85%
Support, but boats forced to use Sama tiga as estuary is silted and only navigable in Spring tides. Access to the TPI required dredging.
Leupung Previously TPI, destroyed in the Tsunami
FAO processing equipment 100% Strong support with active trading, but requiring warf which will be completed by DKP
Samalanga Boats would moor on the bank
ADB community grants 100%
Strong support with some local trading. Already used by visiting boats from Lhokseumawe. Some difficulties with estuary access
Plimbang Boats would moor on the bank
ADB community grants 100%
The villagers gave the land and supported the initiative at the beginning. Now they are reluctant to accept the handover because of severe problems with estuary access.
Rancong Boats would moor on the bank
ADB community grants 100% Strong support with active trading.
Seunuddon Boats would moor on the bank
ADB Fishing kelompok/community grants 100%
Support pre Tsunami, but low levels of economic activity. Severe problems with estuary access.
SPDN
Lambado Lhok Yes DKP TPI, ADB ETESP Pasar / JICA Pasar Ikan, ADB Fishing kelompok/community grants.
Strong support. Awaiting Pertamina licence.
Pusong Yes DKP TPI and Pasar, ADB LSC, Private Ice supply, ADB Fishing kelompok/community grants.
Strong support. Awaiting Pertamina licence
Muara Batu Yes DKP TPI, ADB Ice plant, ADB Fishing kelompok/community grants.
Strong support. Awaiting Pertamina licence
BBM
62
Lahusa No ADB Fishing kelompok/community grants 100%
Strong support because alternate supplies incur transport costs and are contaminated with kersosen.
Tuhemberua
No ADB Fishing kelompok/community
grants 100% Strong support because alternate supplies incur transport costs and are contaminated with kersosen.
Ice plant
Muara Batu Yes DKP TPI, ADB SPDN, ADB Fishing kelompok/fishing and trading community grants.
100% Strong support. Awaiting Training
Fish market
Krueng Sabee
Previously in another location, but poor condition
ADB refrigerated transport lorry DKP TPI, IRC Ice plant. 100% Strong support. Well utilised, and
request for extension.
Source: ADB ETESP site visits, December 2008
ETESP also sought to confirm the state of hand over and transition to Community management (Table 21). This assessment follows BRR ADB ETESP’s preparation of guidelines for the handover process, and subsequent meetings between BRR Satker, the consultants and DKP. It is noteworthy that since the activities, some of the Local Government organizations had expressed reluctance to handover over asset ownership to the communities.
The following observations were made:
• There are only two cases to date of project hand over, Krueng Sabee, Calang, and Ujung Drien, Aceh Barat;
• The is only one case where an MoU has been agreed between DKP and the beneficiaries (the cooperatives);
• There are five cases where Managers have been selected by the Community, but with no sign of a hand over. One of the managers (Muara Batu SPDN was preselected by DKP);
• Training has only been received in Nias and Nias Selatan (BBM). Ice plant training was about to commence for Muara Batu, and is arranged for ice plants in Nias Selatan and Nias.
Table 21 Summary management activities: Handover, MoU and training received
Management Handover
MoU in place
Manager appointed
Training received Comments
Landing site
Ujung Drien Yes No No No No discussions with DKP to date
Arongan L No No No No No discussions with DKP to date
Teunom No No No No No discussions with DKP to date
63
Panga No No No No
No discussions with DKP to date. Problems with contractors in not completing the site.
Leupung No No No No No discussions with DKP to date
Samalanga No No Yes No Manager seeks training
Plimbang No No No No Some discussions with DKP but community effused to manage
Rancong No No No No
No discussions with DKP to date. Problems with contractors in not completing the site.
Seunuddon No No No No
Some discussions with DKP but community refused to manage the facility.
SPDN
Lambado Lhok No No Yes No
Pertamina resistant to licence approval
Pusong No No Yes, but not clear No Pertamina resistant to licence
approval
Muara Batu
No No Yes No
Pertamina resistant to licence approval
BBM
Lahusa No No Yes Yes Village cooperative identified, Awaiting discussions with DKP
Tuhemberua
No No Yes Yes
Village cooperative identified, Awaiting discussions with DKP
Ice plant
Muara Batu No No Yes
Training scheduled
No discussions with DKP to date
Teluk Dalam No No Yes Training scheduled
Awaiting ice plant to be made operational
Gunong Sitoli No No Yes Training scheduled
Awaiting ice plant to be made operational
Fish market
Krueng Sabee
Yes Yes Yes
Request quality control training
DKP MoU incorporating ADB guidelines.
Source: ADB ETESP site visits, December 2008
64
Component performance
Table 22: Summary of strengths weaknesses and opportunities of BRR ADB ETESP fisheries infrastructure rehabilitation
Strengths Weaknesses
• Small-scale fisheries landing and post harvest facilities restored
• community support for the assets provided
• No strategic assessment at district capacity and needs (as opposed to localised assessments);
• improved community participation in the design of assets;
• TPI access (problems with siltation of estuaries) • poor quality control applied by some contractors; • poor monitoring of some construction activities • DKP Handover processes slow to materialise; • stronger focus on community ownership/participation by
DKP • Without following the BRR ADB ETESP MoU on asset
management, no clear understanding on who does what in terms of asset maintenance and longer term reconstruction
Opportunities Threats
• DKP/Multi donor strategic assessment of needs (landing sites/markets, ice and fuel demand)
• Hand over process to follow BRR ADB ETESP guidelines empowering the community, but retaining long term commitment to infrastructure maintenance in the future
• Improved quality control standards to be implemented to TPI, markets and ice manufacturers
• DKP / Ministry of works to commit to estuary dredging in sites affected
• Demarcation of site activities between donors
• Local Government using assets as a mechanism to collect income (retribusi) which disappear into non fisheries local budgets;
65
Conclusions
Small-scale fisheries landing and post-harvest facilities restored (SC 4);
Table 23: BRR ADB ETESP Village grant sub component evaluation
High Successful Partly successful Unsuccessful Weighting
Relevance 3 20%
Effectiveness 2 30%
Efficiency 2 30%
Sustainability 2 20%
Overall rating 2.2 Successful
66
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT
APPENDIX 10a – PHOTO GALLERY
Sub Component 1 ( Village Grant )
Fisher group assisted gears - Baet Aceh Besar – 06 Feb 2007
Woman group dried fish - Baet, Aceh Besar – 26 June 2008
67
Sub Component 2
5 Gt boat - Kula Bubon in Aceh Barat – 10 Jul 2008
ADB's Boats berthing in Port of Lampulo in Banda Aceh 4 Aug 2008
68
Sub Component 3
Hatchery in Bantayan in Aceh Utara 18 Jan 2008
Tilapia KJA in Lhok Kruet in Aceh Jaya, 05 Apr 2008
69
Sub Component 4
Cool Dry Fish Store Panteraja A.Pidie, 15 Feb 2008
PPI Plimbang Bireuen, 15 Feb 2008
70
Sub Component 5
A farmer planting manrove in Aceh Utar, 02 Nov 2007
Planted mangrove in Baet of Aceh Besar, 05 Aug 2007
71
Training
Onsite training approach has proven results during ADB ETESP fisheries seaweed project in Nias and Nias Selatan, 2008
Rotifer culture (juvenile fish food), practical fish hatchery training for operators in Ujong Batee, February – March 2009
72
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT
APPENDIX 10b – PHOTO GALLERY
Capture Fisheries-Livelihoods Service Centre
Socialization for PL Lhokseumawe - combining the LSC-CF & CBBS 28 Apr 2009
73
Socialization for 8 PL District Lhok 04 Jul 2008
RDKK Training for 8 PL by consultant & Satker BRR Perikanan 24 Aug 2008
Panglima Laot & facilitator sign RDKK contract with Satker & consultant Oct 2008
74
Radio communication training for fishers Aceh Besar & bna 23 Jan 2008
IT central training Unsyiah for Aid district Panglima Laot 19-23 Sep 2008
75
CF-LSC Sigli Rehabilitation November 2008
GPS Training for Lampulo Fishermen & Facilitator February 2009
76
Post harvest Tuna processing training Meureudu 14 May 2009
MicroFinance - BPD dialog 17 Mar 2009
77
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT
APPENDIX 10c – PHOTO GALLERY
Aquaculture Livelihood Service Centres (ALSC )
Activity in ALSC Samalanga, Bireuen – Farmers conversing by Skype over internet
with technical Team at AACC BBAP Ujong Batee
A shrimp farmer’s smile shows his successful introduction to
internet communication technology at the ETESP ALSC
78
ALSC farmers practicing the newly introduced internet technology to access the ALSC website (www.tambakaceh.org)
79
Aceh Aquaculture Service Centre (AACC)
One of the AACC services is to facilitate technical services for farmers
Hands-on training for improving farmer skills in fish hatchery techniques
80
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT
APPENDIX 11. LIST OF PUBLICATIONS No Category Title
1 District Concept Notes
District Concepts Notes-Aceh Barat-2006 2 District Concepts Notes-Aceh Besar-2006 3 District Concepts Notes-Aceh Jaya-2006 4 District Concepts Notes-Aceh Utara-2006 5 District Concepts Notes-Bireuen-2006 6 District Concepts Notes-Banda Aceh-2006 7 District Concepts Notes-Lhokeseumawe-2006 8 District Concepts Notes-Nias-2006 9 District Concepts Notes-Nias Selatan-2006
10 District Concepts Notes-Pidie-2006 11 District Concepts Notes-Simeulue-2006 12 Sub-Project Appraisal
Report (SPAR)- Sub-Project Appraisal Report (SPAR) - General-2006
13 Sub-Project Appraisal Report (SPAR) - Islands-2006 14 Sub-Project Appraisal Report (SPAR) - NAD East Coast-2006 15 Sub-Project Appraisal Report (SPAR) - NAD West Coast-2006 16 Sub-Project
Preparation Report (SPPR)
Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Aceh Barat-2006 17 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Aceh Besar-2006L 18 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Aceh Besar-2006 19 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Aceh Jaya-2006 20 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Aceh Utara-2006L 21 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Aceh Utara-2006 22 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Bireuen-2006 23 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Banda Aceh-2006L 24 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Banda Aceh-2006 25 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Lhokeseumawe-2006 26 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Nias-2006L 27 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Nias -2006 28 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Nias Selatan-2006L 29 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Nias Selatan-2006 30 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Pidie-2006L 31 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Pidie-2006 32 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Simeulue-2006 33 Initial Environmental
Examination (IEE) Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Aceh Barat-2006
34 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Aceh Besar-2006L 35 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Aceh Besar-2006 36 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Aceh Jaya-2006 37 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Aceh Utara-2006L 38 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Aceh Utara-2006 39 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Bireuen-2006 40 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Banda Aceh-2006L 41 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Banda Aceh-2006 42 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Lhokeseumawe-2006 43 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Nias-2006L 44 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Nias -2006 45 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Nias Selatan-2006L 46 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Nias Selatan-2006 47 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Pidie-2006L 48 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Pidie-2006 49 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Simeulue-2006 50 Monitoring Reports Inception Report-Nov 2005 51 1st Quarterly Report-Dec2005 52 2nd Quarterly Report-Mar2006 53 3rd Quarterly Report-Jun2006 54 4th Quarterly Report-Sep2006 55 5th Quarterly Report-Dec2006 56 6th Quarterly Report-Mar2007 57 Quarterly Environmental Report-Mar2007 58 7th Quarterly Report-Jun2007 59 8th Quarterly & Final Report-Dec2007 60 Inception Report (Package40)-Apr2008 61 Quarterly Report (Package 40)-Jul2008
81
62 Status Report-Jul2008 63 Design studies Design drawing for boats 64 Design study for the rehabilitation of small-scale shrimp hatcheries 65 Design study for the rehabilitation of aquaculture ponds and canals-Bireuen district 66 Design study for the rehabilitation of aquaculture ponds and canals-Aceh Besar district 67 Design study for the rehabilitation of aquaculture ponds and canals-Kota Lhokseumawe 68 Design study for the rehabilitation of small-scale fish landings (PPI/TPI) in Simeulue 69 Design study for the rehabilitation of small-scale fish landings (PPI/TPI) in Aceh Barat 70 Design study for the rehabilitation of small-scale fish landings (PPI/TPI) in Bireuen
71 Design study for Green belt design and mapping in Neuhuen Village, Mesjid Raya, Aceh Besar
72 Design study for the rehabilitation of aquaculture ponds and canals- Aceh Utara district and Kota Banda Aceh
73 Design study for the rehabilitation of small scale fish landings (PPI/TPI) in Nias and Nias Selatan
74 Design study for the rehabilitation of small-scale fish landings (PPI/TPI) in Aceh Jaya and Aceh Besar
75 Design study for the rehabilitation of small-scale fish landings (PPI/TPI) in Aceh Utara and Lhokseumawe
76 Sonar Mapping Phase 1: Design and monitoring study for fisheries community 77 Design Study for the rehabilitation of aquaculture ponds and canals Aceh Utara
78 Design Study for the Rehabilitation of Aquaculture ponds & canals-Samudera sub- district, Aceh Utara
79 Design Studies for the rehabilatation of small-scale fish landings (miniPPI) in Kembang Tanjung, Pidie and Fishers' administration office in Panteraja, Pidie, Nias Selatan Sitoli
80 Design Study for the rehabilitation of aquaculture ponds and canals-Aceh Barat 81 Deep well survey and design in Ulee Lheue
82 Design study for rehabilitation on civil works design drawings, specification and supporting documents for the construction of fisheries in Lhokseumawe
83 Design Study for small-scale livelihood cluster on west coast (capture fisheries) 84 Design Study for small-scale livelihood cluster on east coast (Tambaks, Bireuen) 85 BBIP Rehabilitation and services recovery 86 Boat design (2006 budgets) 87 Shrimp hatchery design (1st & 2nd contract) 88 BPP office design, Aceh Jaya. BBIP drawings 89 DIPA 2007 budget design services 90 Fisheries infrastructure quantity surveyor, preparation of BOQ for Nias 91 Fisheries Infrastructure Draughtsman 92 Architect Consulting Services for Banda Aceh Provincial DKP building design- 93 Civil works draughtsman - CAD operator BBIP 94 Mapping services for aquaculture villages 95 Design for Kota DKP Banda Aceh office 96 Civil engineering design and drawing. Monitoring services 97 Survey for Seaweed Aquaculture Development
98 Training Report and Materials
Report & materials for Crab fattening training in Banda Aceh; Aceh Utara; Aceh Besar; Pidie; Bireuen
99 Report & materials for Seaweed farming in Pulo Aceh, Aceh Besar; Nias and Nias Selatan 100 Report & materials for Tilapia culture for Aceh Barat district
101 Report & materials for Marine cage training in Simeulue; Aceh Besar, Nias and Nias Selatan
102 Report & materials for Better Management Proctices for Brackish aquaculture in Aceh Besar;Aceh Utara, Lhoseumawe, Bireun, Pidie
103 Report & materials for Fish processing in Banda Aceh;Simeulue; Lhokseumawe; Pidie; Bireuen, Aceh Utara
104 Report & materials for Mangrove Campaign in Lhokseumawe; Pidie; Bireun
105 Report & materials for Mangrove and Coastal Vegetation Rehabilitation Training in Aceh Utara; Lhokseumawe; Pidie, Bireuen and Aceh Barat
106 Report & materials for Simeulu Grouper nursery training 107 Report & materials for Extension staff training in Aceh Utara, Aceh Besar, Pidie, Bireuen 108 Report & materials for BBIP training in Nias, Nias Selatan, Simeulue 109 Report & materials for BBIP staffs training to Gondol 110 Report & materials for BBM management training in Nias 111 Report & materials for Nias post harvest training in Nias 112 Report & materials for Nias Farmers/Fishers training in Nias 113 Guidelines Guidelines for Subcomponent 1 ( 114 Guidelines for Subcomponent 2 115 Guidelines for Subcomponent 3 116 Guidelines for Subcomponent 5
82
117 Guidelines for Subcomponent 6 118 Guidelines for Subcomponent 7 119 Extension materials Poster: Mangrove Conservation Poster Version I 120 Poster: Mangrove Conservation Poster Version II 121 Poster: Pesticide Poster 122 Poster: Tambak BMP & Calendar 123 Poster: ETESP Fisheries Calendar 2008 124 Poster: Pond Book 125 Video: Shrimp BMP DVD 126 Fact sheet 1: Community Bathymetric Survey 127 Fact sheet 2: Managing Information 128 Fact sheet 3: River Clean Up 129 Fact sheet 4: Mapping biodiversity 130 Manual: Tambak BMP Booklet in English/ Bahasa Indonesia 131 Brochure: Grouper farming handbook 132 Brochure: Crab fattening handbook 133 Brochure: Lobster collecting technique 134 Brochure: Lobster fattening technique 135 Brochure: Lobster holding technique handbook 136 Brochure: Tilapia farming technique in cage 137 Brochure: Tilapia farming technique in pond 138 Brochure: Tilapia nursery technique 139 Brochure: Tilapia live packaging technique 140 Brochure: AACC introduction and operation
ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT APPENDIX 11b Publications Produced by Community Based Bathymetric Survey (Sonar Mapping Sub‐Project)
Already Produced and Distributed by May 2009
No Item Amoun
t Location
1 Bathymetric Map version 1 500 Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh
2 Fish Identification Handbook 200 Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh
3 Manual of Garmin 178 C Sounder translated into Bahasa
188 Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh
4 Manual of Garmin 400i translated into Bahasa
50 Lhoksumawe
5 IUU Log 235 Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh
6 Video : Mapping The Sea Improving Livelihood
135 Banda Aceh, WOC 2009 ‐ Menado
7 Handout of Fish Finder and Navigation Training
27 Banda Aceh
8 Fact sheet #1 Community‐based Bathymetric Survey
200 WOC 2009 ‐ Menado
9 Fact sheet #2 Panglima Laot Managing Information
100 WOC 2009 ‐ Menado
83
10 Factsheet #3 River cleanup project 1 Banda Aceh
11 Fact sheet #4 Panglima Laot Mapping Biodiversity
100 WOC 2009 ‐ Menado
12 Factsheet #5 Building a radio communications network 1 Banda Aceh
13 Senior Thesis : Inventory of Pelagic Fish Species in Fish Landing of Lampulo
8 Safrizal Putra, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh
14 Senior Thesis : Study of Fish Haul Using Fishfinder With Purse Seine in Northern Aceh
8 Anjar Sunandar, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh
15 Senior Thesis : The effect of GPS and Fishfinder Toward Catch and Income of Fishermen in Lampulo Village
8 Nur Meilina, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh
16
Senior Thesis : Indenfication of Fishing Ground Based on GPS/Sounder Data That Was Recorded By Artisanal Purse Seine Vessel Fishing in Northern Aceh
8 Nazaruddin, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh
17 Senior Thesis : Bathymetric and Sea Surface Temperature Mapping Based on Measurement By Fishfinder in Northern Aceh
8 Dwi Person, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh
18 Research Internship : Technical Usage of Fishfinder By Fishermen in Lampulo Village
8 Fazlullah, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh
19 Research Internship : Bathymetric Data Collection By Panglima Laot Lhok Krueng Aceh, Lampulo, Banda Aceh
8 Putradiansyah, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh
20 Community Based Bathymetric Survey Poster I
1
International Workshop : Learning From The Recovery and Reconstruction of Aceh and Other Tsunamy‐Stricken Regions , December 2008, Banda Aceh
21 Community Based Bathymetric Survey Poster II
1
International Workshop : Learning From The Recovery and Reconstruction of Aceh and Other Tsunamy‐Stricken Regions , December 2008, Banda Aceh
22 MapAsia International Conference 1 2007, Kuala Lumpur 23 Aceh Green Conference 1 October 2008 24 Indonesian Geotechnology Conference 1 July 30, 2008
The Abstract Submit to The Join Board of Geospatial Information Societies (JBGIS)
1 March 30, 2009
25 Indonesian Geotechnology Conference 1 August 29, 2007
26 Customs and Traditional Law of Panglima Laot According to Panglima Laot Annual Meeting Year 1992 Translated into English
1 Banda Aceh
To be Produced before end June 2009 No
Item Amoun
t Location
1 Shrimp and Lobster Poster 300 Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe,
84
Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh
2 Shark Poster 300
Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh
3 Commercial fish Poster 300
Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh
4 Coral fish poster 300
Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh
5 Commercial Size Classification of Tiger Prawn 400
Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh, Samalanga, Jangka, Gandapura, Samudera
6 Commercial Size Classification of White Shrimp 400
Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh, Samalanga, Jangka, Gandapura, Samudera
7 Minimum Size Reproduction Poster 400
Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh,
8 Bathymetric Map version 2 500
Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh,
9 Current Map 500
Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh,
10 Unjam Map 500
Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh,
11 Bathymetric Map of Banda Aceh, Pulo Aceh, and Sabang
300 Banda Aceh, Sabang, and Pulo Aceh
12 Bathymetric Map of Calang 100 Calang 13 Bathymetric Map of Lhoong 100 Lhoong 14 Bathymetric Map of Lhoksumawe 200 Lhoksumawe
85
APPENDIX 11c SUMMARY OF ALL PUBLICATIONS BY CAPTURE FISHERIES LIVELIHOODS SERVICE CENTRES TO 30 JUNE 2009
Date of Publication Publication Location Distribution Cost Outputs
August 2008 RDKK Guidelines
8 Panglima Laot, Satker BRR, ADB ETESP, NACA
Rp. 600.000,‐ RDKK Community Contract Guidelines
September 2008 IT Module – 60 sets 8 Panglima Laot & PL official, 8 Centres
Rp. 698.000,‐ IT Module: Word, Spreadsheet, Internet & Database
November 2008 Information for CF centre – 7 posters
7 centres : Lampulo, Saney/Lhoong, Calang, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada & Pusong/Lhokseumawe
Rp. 350.000,‐
Poster A3
December 2008 Map of 8 Centres
3 maps
Project Office at Lampulo, Training Room at Lampulo and CF Lampulo
Rp. 270.000,‐ Banner – map of 8 CF‐LSC
December 2008 Radio Communication – 15 Sets
8 Centres & 2 Panglima Laot Sabang & Pulo Aceh
Rp. 271.000,‐ Manual book about VHF & long range SSB
December 2008 Newsletter 1st edition – 2000 exp
8 centres & 2 location : Lampulo, Saney/Lhoong, Calang, Meulaboh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Pusong/Lhokseumawe
Pulo Aceh & Sabang
Rp.2.180.000,‐
(Rp. 2.000.000,‐ for printing and cost of mailing 9 location)
Newsletter 1st edition
January 2009 GPS guidelines – 100 sets
8 Centres & 2 Panglima Laot Sabang & Pulo Aceh
Rp. 200.000,‐ Hardcopies of GPS guidelines
March 2009 Newsletter 2nd edition – 2000 exp
8 centres & 2 location : Lampulo, Saney/Lhoong, Calang, Meulaboh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Pusong/Lhokseumawe
Pulo Aceh & Sabang
Rp.2.180.000,‐
(Rp. 2.000.000,‐ for printing and cost of mailing 9 location)
Newsletter 2nd
edition
March 2009 Data Base Guidelines
10 sets
7 LSC‐CF Facilitators
Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Pusong/Lhokseumawe, Lampulo, Saney/Lhoong & Sigli
Rp. 150.000,‐ Training and distribute
86
March 2009 LSC‐CF infor included with RDKK 8 centres
50 sets
BPD Dialogue at Nangro Hotel with participant NAD BPD Branch
Rp. 1.050.000,‐ BPD Dialogue presentation
May 2009 Post Harvest Tuna Processing – 100 sets
8 Centres Rp. 500.000,‐ Training and distribute of modul
June 2009 Newsletter 3rd edition – 2000 exp
8 centres & 2 location : Lampulo, Saney/Lhoong, Calang, Meulaboh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Pusong/Lhokseumawe
Pulo Aceh & Sabang
Rp. 3.680.000,‐
(Rp. 2.000.000 for pinting, 500.000 for designer cost and 180.000 for distributing cost)
In production; printing end of May 2009
Will be distributied in June 2009
87
Annex 12
88
PCSS
No
PCSS
No
Rp Forex US$
Equiv Rp Forex US$
Equiv Rp Forex Rp Forex 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2
74,995,000 9,217 8,136.60 74,995,000 9,309 8,056.18 75.0 9,217 75.0 9,309 74,996,500 9,345 8,025.31 75.0 9,345 74,976,630 9,234 8,119.63 74,976,630 9,281 8,078.51 75.0 9,234 75.0 9,281 74,963,880 9,225 8,126.17 75.0 9,225 199,925,610 9,055 22,079.03 199.9 9,055 74,719,845 9,217 8,106.74 74,719,845 9,309 8,026.62 74.7 9,217 74.7 9,309 29,995,000 9,217 3,254.31 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 91,530,465 9,351 9,788.31 91,530,465 9,303 9,838.81 91.5 9,351 91.5 9,303 105,121,200 9,351 11,241.71 105,121,200 9,281 11,326.49 105.1 9,351 105.1 9,281 37,499,790 9,091 4,124.94 37.5 9,091 199,548,720 9,421 21,181.27 199.5 9,421 G00425 199,763,000 9,030 22,122.15 199.8 9,030 G00425 199,878,180 9,030 22,134.90 199.9 9,030 29,995,000 9,234 3,248.32 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,234 30.0 9,309 49,616,500 9,387 5,285.66 49.6 9,387 199,893,888 9,421 21,217.91 199.9 9,421 29,995,000 9,217 3,254.31 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309
89
74,953,680 9,217 8,132.11 74,953,680 9,309 8,051.74 75.0 9,217 75.0 9,309 74,957,760 9,225 8,125.50 74,957,760 9,281 8,076.47 75.0 9,225 75.0 9,281 74,978,925 9,309 8,054.46 75.0 9,309 29,990,000 9,217 3,253.77 29,990,000 9,309 3,221.61 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 74,972,805 9,372 7,999.66 74,972,805 9,345 8,022.77 75.0 9,372 75.0 9,345 29,998,000 9,217 3,254.64 29,998,000 9,309 3,222.47 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 29,995,000 9,217 3,254.31 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 74,983,500 9,345 8,023.92 75.0 9,345 29,995,000 9,217 3,254.31 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 74,989,000 9,345 8,024.51 75.0 9,345
74,971,250 8,975 8,353.34 74,971,250 8,974 8,354.27 75.0 8,975 75.0 8,974 74,971,250 9,338 8,029.05 74,971,250 8,974 8,354.27 75.0 9,338 75.0 8,974
74,978,500 9,303 8,059.60 75.0 9,303 74,995,500 9,345 8,025.20 75.0 9,345
88,000,000 9,338 9,424.36 88.0 9,338 253,000,000 9,338 27,095.05 253.0 9,338 193,600,000 9,338 20,733.60 193.6 9,338 15,000,000 8,975 1,671.31 15.0 8,975
49,990,200 9,303 5,373.56 50.0 9,303 73,394,000 9,091 8,073.26 73,394,000 9,309 7,884.20 73.4 9,091 73.4 9,309 123,035,500 9,091 13,533.77 123,035,500 9,309 13,216.83 123.0 9,091 123.0 9,309 123,606,500 9,408 13,138.45 123,606,500 9,303 13,286.74 123.6 9,408 123.6 9,303
90
134,639,000 9,091 14,810.14 134,639,000 9,309 14,463.32 134.6 9,091 134.6 9,309 4,999,979 9,314 536.82 5.0 9,314
220,000,000 9,338 23,559.65 220.0 9,338 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338 108,271,215 9,328 11,607.12 108,271,215 9,302 11,639.56 108.3 9,328 108.3 9,302 99,722,000 9,408 10,599.70 99,722,000 9,281 10,744.75 99.7 9,408 99.7 9,281 149,991,000 9,314 16,103.82 150.0 9,314 269,000,000 9,225 29,159.89 269.0 9,225
91
G00425 38,395,350 9,020 4,256.69 38,395,350 9,028 4,252.92 38.4 9,020 38.4 9,028
137,500,000 9,338 14,725.57 137.5 9,338 90,750,000 9,338 9,718.88 90.8 9,338 264,000,000 9,338 28,273.09 264.0 9,338
111,430,500 9,408 11,844.23 111,430,500 9,302 11,979.20 111.4 9,408 111.4 9,302
18,000,000 9,338 1,927.71 18.0 9,338 4,999,800 9,309 537.09 5.0 9,309 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 4,995,900 9,281 538.29 5.0 9,281 117,893,000 9,408 12,531.14 117,893,000 9,281 12,702.62 117.9 9,408 117.9 9,281 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 199,997,520 9,341 21,410.72 200.0 9,341 68,047,500 9,408 7,232.94 68,047,500 9,309 7,309.86 68.0 9,408 68.0 9,309 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 G00425 38,395,350 9,020 4,256.69 38,395,350 9,028 4,252.92 38.4 9,020 38.4 9,028 199,996,500 9,236 21,654.02 200.0 9,236 199,787,400 9,357 21,351.65 199.8 9,357 199,517,100 9,055 22,033.91 199.5 9,055 128,993,000 9,091 14,189.09 128,993,000 9,309 13,856.81 129.0 9,091 129.0 9,309 18,380,400 9,281 1,980.43 18.4 9,281 95,157,075 9,351 10,176.14 95,157,075 9,303 10,228.64 95.2 9,351 95.2 9,303 107,792,325 9,351 11,527.36 107,792,325 9,303 11,586.83 107.8 9,351 107.8 9,303 120,372,049 9,351 12,872.64 120,372,049 9,302 12,940.45 120.4 9,351 120.4 9,302
92
116,007,819 9,351 12,405.93 116,007,820 9,282 12,498.15 116.0 9,351 116.0 9,282 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 4,998,000 9,309 536.90 5.0 9,309 199,930,200 9,363 21,353.22 199.9 9,363
200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 129,546,000 9,091 14,249.92 129,546,000 9,309 13,916.21 129.5 9,091 129.5 9,309 122,095,000 9,091 13,430.32 122,095,000 9,309 13,115.80 122.1 9,091 122.1 9,309 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338
275,000,000 9,028 30,460.79 275.0 9,028 114,109,440 9,351 12,202.91 114.1 9,351 114.1 9,302 108,851,850 9,351 11,640.66 108,851,850 9,302 11,701.98 108.9 9,351 108.9 9,302 106,785,585 9,351 11,419.70 106,785,585 9,303 11,478.62 106.8 9,351 106.8 9,303 59,998,950 9,225 6,503.95 60.0 9,225 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 4,999,600 9,282 538.63 5.0 9,282 4,999,800 9,314 536.80 5.0 9,314 132,762,000 9,091 14,603.67 132,762,000 9,309 14,261.68 132.8 9,091 132.8 9,309 4,999,000 9,282 538.57 5.0 9,282 38,193,500 9,110 4,192.48 38,193,500 9,314 4,100.65 38.2 9,110 38.2 9,314 97,062,500 9,356 10,374.36 97.1 9,356 4,995,900 9,282 538.24 5.0 9,282
216,700,000 9,338 23,207.50 216.7 9,338 115,500,000 9,338 12,369.48 115.5 9,338 264,000,000 9,338 28,273.09 264.0 9,338
93
90,000,000 9,010 9,988.90 90.0 9,010 6,428,500 9,338 688.46 6.4 9,338
48,000,000 9,338 5,140.56 48.0 9,338 15,000,000 9,338 1,606.43 15.0 9,338
4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269
200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 G00425 199,984,260 9,034 22,136.85 200.0 9,034
199,899,600 9,028 22,142.18 199.9 9,028 136,600,000 9,028 15,130.70 136.6 9,028 199,010,000 9,028 22,043.64 199.0 9,028 199,950,000 9,028 22,147.76 200.0 9,028 199,400,000 9,028 22,086.84 199.4 9,028 197,740,000 9,028 21,902.97 197.7 9,028 196,668,240 9,028 21,784.25 196.7 9,028 199,510,000 9,338 21,366.53 199.5 9,338 199,500,000 9,028 22,097.92 199.5 9,028 172,817,580 8,980 19,244.72 172.8 8,980 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 188,305,260 9,028 20,857.92 188.3 9,028
G00425 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 G00425 198,996,900 9,034 22,027.55 199.0 9,034 G00425 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034
199,248,636 9,028 22,070.07 199.2 9,028G00425 189,632,280 9,034 20,990.95 189.6 9,034
196,207,200 9,028 21,733.19 196.2 9,028 G00425 199,340,000 9,029 22,077.75 199.3 9,029 G00425 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034
94
G00425 194,106,000 9,034 21,486.16 194.1 9,034 198,951,000 9,028 22,037.11 199.0 9,028
G00425 199,155,000 9,034 22,045.05 199.2 9,034 197,472,000 9,028 21,873.28 197.5 9,028
G00425 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 190,946,550 9,028 21,150.48 190.9 9,028
87,900,000 9,091 9,668.90 87,900,000 9,309 9,442.48 87.9 9,091 87.9 9,309 G00425 45,000,000 9,050 4,972.38 45.0 9,050 199,999,560 9,363 21,360.63 200.0 9,363 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 199,991,400 9,357 21,373.45 200.0 9,357 199,998,540 9,363 21,360.52 200.0 9,363 199,999,560 9,345 21,401.77 200.0 9,345 199,995,800 9,110 21,953.44 200.0 9,110 199,108,080 9,236 21,557.83 199.1 9,236 199,567,080 9,225 21,633.29 199.6 9,225 199,941,900 9,071 22,041.88 199.9 9,071 199,999,560 9,303 21,498.39 200.0 9,303 199,879,200 9,071 22,034.97 199.9 9,071 199,825,140 9,090 21,982.96 199.8 9,090 199,995,480 9,357 21,373.89 200.0 9,357 199,998,030 9,064 22,065.10 200.0 9,064 199,958,760 9,281 21,544.96 200.0 9,281 200,000,000 9,026 22,158.21 200.0 9,026 199,999,968 9,402 21,272.07 200.0 9,402
95
199,934,280 9,236 21,647.28 199.9 9,236 199,999,999 9,345 21,401.82 200.0 9,345 199,986,300 9,110 21,952.39 200.0 9,110 199,999,560 9,345 21,401.77 200.0 9,345 200,000,000 9,026 22,158.21 200.0 9,026 199,909,800 9,026 22,148.22 199.9 9,026 199,936,354 9,110 21,946.91 199.9 9,110 199,826,160 9,021 22,151.22 199.8 9,021 199,567,080 9,225 21,633.29 199.6 9,225 199,567,080 9,225 21,633.29 199.6 9,225 199,999,152 9,064 22,065.22 200.0 9,064 199,567,080 9,225 21,633.29 199.6 9,225 199,759,860 9,311 21,454.18 199.8 9,311 199,998,948 9,110 21,953.78 200.0 9,110 200,000,000 9,026 22,158.21 200.0 9,026 199,979,160 9,357 21,372.14 200.0 9,357 199,991,400 9,225 21,679.28 200.0 9,225 199,999,560 9,110 21,953.85 200.0 9,110 199,780,260 9,408 21,235.15 199.8 9,408 199,709,220 9,225 21,648.70 199.7 9,225 199,999,050 9,064 22,065.21 200.0 9,064 199,999,560 9,110 21,953.85 200.0 9,110 199,111,283 9,110 21,856.34 199.1 9,110
96
199,588,500 9,026 22,112.62 199.6 9,026 199,996,500 9,110 21,953.51 200.0 9,110 200,000,000 9,026 22,158.21 200.0 9,026 199,995,480 9,110 21,953.40 200.0 9,110 199,999,560 9,345 21,401.77 200.0 9,345 199,999,968 9,110 21,953.89 200.0 9,110 199,905,909 9,110 21,943.57 199.9 9,110 199,984,260 9,064 22,063.58 200.0 9,064
195,800,000 9,338 20,969.21 195.8 9,338 56,202,000 9,387 5,987.22 56.2 9,387 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 199,903,680 9,225 21,669.78 199.9 9,225 199,941,879 9,225 21,673.92 199.9 9,225 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338
15,000,000 9,338 1,606.43 15.0 9,338 4,998,700 9,269 539.29 5.0 9,269
36,000,000 9,338 3,855.42 36.0 9,338 30,825,420 9,314 3,309.58 30.8 9,314 199,991,910 9,341 21,410.12 200.0 9,341
16,500,000 9,338 1,767.07 16.5 9,338 230,995,500 9,028 25,586.56 231.0 9,028 220,000,000 9,028 24,368.63 220.0 9,028 134,338,000 8,975 14,968.02 134,338,000 9,338 14,386.93 134.3 8,975 134.3 9,338 242,000,000 9,338 25,917.00 242.0 9,338 136,050,000 8,975 15,158.77 136.1 8,975 137,500,000 9,338 14,725.57 137.5 9,338
G00425 18,235,000 9,030 2,019.38 18,235,000 9,010 2,023.86 18.2 9,030 18.2 9,010
97
G00425 18,484,500 9,030 2,047.01 18,484,500 9,010 2,051.55 18.5 9,030 18.5 9,010 99,939,000 9,355 10,682.95 99.9 9,355
136,781,500 9,338 14,648.62 136,781,500 9,338 14,648.62 136.8 9,338 136.8 9,338 217,250,000 9,338 23,266.40 217.3 9,338 115,500,000 9,338 12,369.48 115.5 9,338 140,250,000 9,338 15,020.08 140.3 9,338
G00425 42,816,500 9,030 4,741.58 42,816,500 9,010 4,752.11 42.8 9,030 42.8 9,010 115,177,500 8,975 12,833.15 115.2 8,975
G00425 47,871,000 9,030 5,301.33 47,871,000 9,010 5,313.10 47.9 9,030 47.9 9,010 167,750,000 9,338 17,965.19 167.8 9,338 184,250,000 9,338 19,732.26 184.3 9,338
199,990,380 9,298 21,508.97 200.0 9,298 135,718,500 9,338 14,534.00 135.7 9,338 143,000,000 9,338 15,314.59 143.0 9,338 222,750,000 9,338 23,855.42 222.8 9,338
131,037,500 9,356 14,005.72 131.0 9,356 105,032,000 8,975 11,702.73 105,032,000 9,338 11,248.41 105.0 8,975 105.0 9,338
G00425 18,000,000 9,030 1,993.36 18,000,000 9,010 1,997.78 18.0 9,030 18.0 9,010G00425 13,596,500 9,030 1,505.70 13,596,500 9,010 1,509.05 13.6 9,030 13.6 9,010 78,164,000 9,387 8,326.83 78.2 9,387
101,750,000 8,975 11,337.05 101.8 8,975
G00425 45,160,500 9,030 5,001.16 45,160,500 9,028 5,002.27 45.2 9,030 45.2 9,028 184,250,000 9,338 19,732.26 184.3 9,338 135,858,500 9,338 14,549.77 135.9 9,338 272,250,000 9,338 29,155.07 272.3 9,338
117,907,500 9,356 12,602.34 117.9 9,356 195,797,000 9,338 20,968.89 195.8 9,338
G00425 18,500,000 9,030 2,048.73 18,500,000 9,010 2,053.27 18.5 9,030 18.5 9,010 114,950,000 9,338 12,310.58 115.0 9,338
98
G00425 13,596,500 9,030 1,505.70 13,596,500 9,010 1,509.05 13.6 9,030 13.6 9,010 82,000,000 9,338 8,781.79 82.0 9,338 131,700,000 9,338 14,104.42 131.7 9,338
G00425 48,050,000 9,030 5,321.15 48,070,000 9,028 5,324.55 48.1 9,030 48.1 9,028 167,750,000 9,338 17,965.19 167.8 9,338
128,623,000 9,091 14,148.39 128,623,000 9,309 13,817.06 128.6 9,091 128.6 9,309 56,202,000 9,387 5,987.22 56.2 9,387 56,202,000 9,387 5,987.22 56.2 9,387 66,361,200 9,281 7,150.22 66.4 9,281 199,991,400 9,357 21,373.45 200.0 9,357 269,000,000 9,225 29,159.89 269.0 9,225 132,932,000 9,091 14,622.37 132,932,000 9,309 14,279.94 132.9 9,091 132.9 9,309 49,980,000 9,389 5,323.25 50.0 9,389
6,428,500 9,338 688.46 6.4 9,338
120,064,000 9,338 12,858.26 120.1 9,338 209,000,000 9,338 22,381.67 209.0 9,338
121,015,500 9,356 12,934.53 121.0 9,356 106,864,000 9,338 11,444.61 106.9 9,338
G00425 17,500,000 9,030 1,937.98 17,500,000 9,010 1,942.29 17.5 9,030 17.5 9,010 108,350,000 9,338 11,603.75 108.4 9,338
G00425 16,506,000 9,030 1,827.91 16,506,000 9,010 1,831.96 16.5 9,030 16.5 9,010 95,671,000 9,387 10,191.86 95.7 9,387
133,363,000 8,975 14,859.39 133.4 8,975 170,500,000 9,338 18,259.71 170.5 9,338
155,092,500 9,408 16,485.17 75,092,500 9,281 8,090.99 155.1 9,408 75.1 9,281 31,445,070 9,314 3,376.11 31.4 9,314
99
269,000,000 9,225 29,159.89 269.0 9,225 G00425 200,000,000 9,020 22,172.95 200.0 9,020
15,000,000 9,338 1,606.43 15.0 9,338 6,428,500 9,338 688.46 6.4 9,338
14,869,050 9,314 1,596.42 14.9 9,314 112,302,000 9,282 12,098.90 112.3 9,282 34,920,500 9,110 3,833.21 34,920,500 9,314 3,749.25 34.9 9,110 34.9 9,314 80,347,400 9,309 8,631.15 80.3 9,309
93,778,000 9,338 10,043.16 93,778,000 9,038 10,375.97 93.8 9,338 93.8 9,038
200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 4,998,000 9,314 536.61 5.0 9,314 199,991,400 9,341 21,410.06 200.0 9,341 126,971,000 9,091 13,966.67 126,971,000 9,309 13,639.60 127.0 9,091 127.0 9,309 269,000,000 9,225 29,159.89 269.0 9,225 9,996,000 9,314 1,073.22 10.0 9,314 74,930,574 9,225 8,122.56 74.9 9,225 4,998,000 9,309 536.90 5.0 9,309 60,000,000 9,303 6,449.53 60.0 9,303
30,000,000 9,338 3,212.68 30.0 9,338 49,980,000 9,049 5,523.26 50.0 9,049 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 129,221,500 9,091 14,214.22 129,221,500 9,309 13,881.35 129.2 9,091 129.2 9,309 G00425 20,164,125 9,020 2,235.49 20,164,125 9,028 2,233.51 20.2 9,020 20.2 9,028
100
199,998,540 9,298 21,509.85 200.0 9,298 49,995,300 9,338 5,353.96 50.0 9,338 49,995,300 9,338 5,353.96 50.0 9,338 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 60,000,000 9,314 6,441.92 60.0 9,314 60,000,000 9,303 6,449.53 60.0 9,303 60,000,000 9,303 6,449.53 60.0 9,303 60,000,000 9,303 6,449.53 60.0 9,303 60,000,000 9,303 6,449.53 60.0 9,303 60,000,000 9,303 6,449.53 60.0 9,303 G00425 200,000,000 9,020 22,172.95 200.0 9,020 74,970,000 9,049 8,284.89 75.0 9,049 74,970,000 9,049 8,284.89 75.0 9,049
137,371,000 9,028 15,216.11 137,371,000 8,763 15,676.25 137.4 9,028 137.4 8,763 123,165,500 9,091 13,548.07 123,165,500 9,309 13,230.80 123.2 9,091 123.2 9,309 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 131,153,000 9,091 14,426.69 131,153,000 9,309 14,088.84 131.2 9,091 131.2 9,309
137,328,500 9,028 15,211.40 137,328,500 8,763 15,671.40 137.3 9,028 137.3 8,763
101
60,000,000 9,338 6,425.70 60.0 9,338 49,980,000 9,389 5,323.25 50.0 9,389 22,891,350 9,110 2,512.77 22,891,350 9,314 2,457.74 22.9 9,110 22.9 9,314
99,070,000 9,338 10,609.91 99,070,000 9,038 10,961.50 99.1 9,338 99.1 9,038 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 31,833,690 9,314 3,417.83 31.8 9,314
12,000,000 9,338 1,285.14 12.0 9,338 129,978,000 9,091 14,297.44 129,978,000 9,309 13,962.62 130.0 9,091 130.0 9,309
200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 220,000,000 9,028 24,368.63 220.0 9,028
134,435,500 9,408 14,289.49 134,435,500 9,302 14,452.32 134.4 9,408 134.4 9,302 132,787,500 9,091 14,606.48 132,787,500 9,309 14,264.42 132.8 9,091 132.8 9,309 90,021,375 9,328 9,650.66 90,021,375 9,281 9,699.53 90.0 9,328 90.0 9,281 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 132,800,000 9,091 14,607.85 132,800,000 9,309 14,265.76 132.8 9,091 132.8 9,309 G00425 8,585,850 9,030 950.81 8,585,850 8,980 956.11 8.6 9,030 8.6 8,980
12,857,000 9,338 1,376.92 12.9 9,338 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028
102
118,427,500 9,091 13,026.89 118,427,500 9,309 12,721.83 118.4 9,091 118.4 9,309
30,000,000 9,338 3,212.85 30.0 9,338 34,157,760 9,314 3,667.36 34.2 9,314
200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 15,000,000 9,338 1,606.43 15.0 9,338 6,428,500 9,338 688.46 6.4 9,338 6,428,500 9,338 688.46 6.4 9,338
4,990,300 9,269 538.39 5.0 9,269 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 4,995,900 9,282 538.24 5.0 9,282
220,000,000 9,034 24,352.45 220.0 9,034 220,000,000 9,338 23,560.91 220.0 9,338
18,380,400 9,314 1,973.42 18.4 9,314 91,973,000 9,371 9,814.64 92.0 9,371 68,070,500 9,372 7,263.18 68.1 9,372 G00425 200,000,000 9,064 22,065.31 200.0 9,064
200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 G00425 30,939,150 9,064 3,413.41 30,939,150 9,010 3,433.87 30.9 9,064 30.9 9,010G00428 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034
165,166,260 9,338 17,688.49 165.2 9,338 104,432,700 8,980 11,629.48 104.4 8,980 197,951,460 8,975 22,055.87 198.0 8,975 155,762,160 8,975 17,355.12 155.8 8,975
199,818,000 9,026 22,138.05 199.8 9,026
103
199,999,560 9,026 22,158.16 200.0 9,026 199,787,400 9,026 22,134.66 199.8 9,026
200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 60,000,000 9,387 6,391.82 60.0 9,387 G00425 200,000,000 9,029 22,150.85 200.0 9,029 199,999,560 9,357 21,374.33 200.0 9,357 199,941,420 9,055 22,080.78 199.9 9,055 199,843,500 9,026 22,140.87 199.8 9,026 G00425 199,053,000 9,064 21,960.83 199.1 9,064 G00425 200,000,000 9,029 22,150.85 200.0 9,029
200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028
199,955,360 9,021 22,165.54 200.0 9,021 199,999,764 9,064 22,065.29 200.0 9,064 G00428 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034
188,171,028 8,980 20,954.46 188.2 8,980 G00425 192,982,040 9,064 21,291.05 193.0 9,064
200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 39,988,590 9,225 4,334.81 40.0 9,225 G00425 200,000,000 9,064 22,065.31 200.0 9,064 G00425 199,930,200 9,074 22,033.30 199.9 9,074 G00425 200,000,000 9,050 22,099.45 200.0 9,050 G00425 200,000,000 9,050 22,099.45 200.0 9,050 199,925,100 9,027 22,147.46 199.9 9,027 199,999,152 9,363 21,360.58 200.0 9,363 129,787,095 9,328 13,913.71 129,787,095 9,303 13,951.10 129.8 9,328 129.8 9,303
133,100,000 9,338 14,254.35 133.1 9,338
104
180,762,360 9,408 19,213.69 180.8 9,408 4,996,900 9,269 539.10 5.0 9,269 199,910,514 9,408 21,248.99 199.9 9,408 199,991,400 9,055 22,086.29 200.0 9,055 199,991,400 9,161 21,830.74 200.0 9,161 G00428 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 199,986,300 9,421 21,227.71 200.0 9,421 199,995,225 9,408 21,258.00 200.0 9,408 4,999,000 9,282 538.57 5.0 9,282
200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028
G00428 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 122,214,000 9,091 13,443.41 122,214,000 9,309 13,128.59 122.2 9,091 122.2 9,309 74,930,574 9,225 8,122.56 74.9 9,225 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 117,591,720 9,328 12,606.32 117,591,720 9,281 12,670.16 117.6 9,328 117.6 9,281 133,839,000 9,091 14,722.14 133,839,000 9,309 14,377.38 133.8 9,091 133.8 9,309
105
29,814,600 9,314 3,201.05 29.8 9,314G00425 200,000,000 9,020 22,172.95 200.0 9,020 122,417,748 9,328 13,123.69 122,417,748 9,281 13,190.15 122.4 9,328 122.4 9,281 59,772,000 9,387 6,367.53 59.8 9,387
24,000,000 9,338 2,570.14 24.0 9,338 101,351,200 9,269 10,934.43 101.4 9,269
69,184,000 9,338 7,409.26 69,184,000 9,038 7,654.79 69.2 9,338 69.2 9,038 113,000,000 9,387 12,037.92 113.0 9,387 30,867,240 9,314 3,314.07 30.9 9,314 34,966,110 9,314 3,754.15 35.0 9,314 199,982,858 9,363 21,358.84 200.0 9,363 112,522,728 9,328 12,062.90 112,522,728 9,281 12,123.99 112.5 9,328 112.5 9,281 56,202,000 9,387 5,987.22 56.2 9,387 G00425 35,476,500 9,030 3,928.74 35,476,500 9,010 3,937.46 35.5 9,030 35.5 9,010
220,000,000 9,028 24,368.63 220.0 9,028 220,000,000 9,028 24,368.63 220.0 9,028
127,859,500 9,091 14,064.40 127,859,500 9,309 13,735.04 127.9 9,091 127.9 9,309 98,157,000 9,408 10,433.35 98,157,000 9,309 10,544.31 98.2 9,408 98.2 9,309 127,278,500 9,091 14,000.49 127,278,500 9,309 13,672.63 127.3 9,091 127.3 9,309 199,925,610 9,341 21,403.02 199.9 9,341
220,000,000 9,028 24,368.63 220.0 9,028 30,000,000 9,338 3,212.85 30.0 9,338 36,000,000 9,338 3,855.42 36.0 9,338
112,594,500 9,408 11,967.95 112,594,500 9,281 12,131.72 112.6 9,408 112.6 9,281 91,678,875 9,351 9,804.18 91,678,875 9,302 9,855.82 91.7 9,351 91.7 9,302
106
124,955,725 9,328 13,395.77 124,955,725 9,281 13,463.61 125.0 9,328 125.0 9,281
15,000,000 9,338 1,606.43 15.0 9,338 15,000,000 9,338 1,606.43 15.0 9,338
199,999,560 9,298 21,509.95 200.0 9,298 91,344,820 9,351 9,768.45 91,344,820 9,302 9,819.91 91.3 9,351 91.3 9,302 62,839,650 9,351 6,720.10 62,839,650 9,303 6,754.77 62.8 9,351 62.8 9,303 134,727,000 9,356 14,400.06 134.7 9,356 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338 131,584,590 9,351 14,071.71 131,584,590 9,303 14,144.32 131.6 9,351 131.6 9,303 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 131,133,500 9,314 14,079.18 131.1 9,314 4,995,900 9,282 538.24 5.0 9,282 4,996,400 9,269 539.04 5.0 9,269 132,953,500 9,356 14,210.51 133.0 9,356
200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 129,605,025 9,351 13,860.02 129,605,025 9,303 13,931.53 129.6 9,351 129.6 9,303 132,812,500 9,356 14,195.44 132.8 9,356 25,071,000 9,371 2,675.38 25.1 9,371 134,533,000 9,356 14,379.33 134.5 9,356 131,219,500 9,356 14,025.17 131.2 9,356 127,689,720 9,351 13,655.19 127,689,720 9,302 13,727.13 127.7 9,351 127.7 9,302 130,092,500 9,356 13,904.71 130.1 9,356
107
112,272,675 9,351 12,006.49 112,272,675 9,303 12,068.44 112.3 9,351 112.3 9,303 134,868,500 9,356 14,415.19 134.9 9,356 133,952,500 9,356 14,317.28 134.0 9,356 109,433,250 9,351 11,702.84 109.4 9,351 G00425 200,000,000 9,050 22,099.45 200.0 9,050 G00425 200,000,000 9,050 22,099.45 200.0 9,050 199,992,828 9,110 21,953.11 200.0 9,110 4,998,000 9,314 536.61 5.0 9,314 G00428 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 4,999,020 9,314 536.72 5.0 9,314
22,500,000 9,028 2,492.25 22.5 9,028 91,055,500 9,338 9,751.59 91,055,500 9,038 10,074.74 91.1 9,338 91.1 9,038 91,950,000 9,338 9,847.39 91,950,000 9,038 10,173.71 92.0 9,338 92.0 9,038 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028
63,357,450 9,408 6,734.42 63.4 9,408 G00425 200,000,000 9,050 22,099.45 200.0 9,050
200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 110,000,000 9,028 12,184.32 110.0 9,028
G00425 200,000,000 9,050 22,099.45 200.0 9,050 109,176,500 9,408 11,604.64 109,176,500 9,281 11,763.44 109.2 9,408 109.2 9,281 96,894,000 9,408 10,299.11 96,894,000 9,281 10,440.04 96.9 9,408 96.9 9,281 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 96,640,500 9,356 10,329.25 96.6 9,356
200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 199,998,540 9,341 21,410.83 200.0 9,341 199,999,050 9,408 21,258.40 200.0 9,408
108
4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 56,000,000 9,387 5,965.70 56.0 9,387 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338 31,651,110 9,314 3,398.23 31.7 9,314 G00425 199,995,500 9,020 22,172.45 200.0 9,020
30,000,000 9,338 3,212.85 30.0 9,338 133,840,500 9,091 14,722.31 133,840,500 9,309 14,377.54 133.8 9,091 133.8 9,309 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 84,306,825 9,351 9,015.81 84,306,825 9,303 9,062.33 84.3 9,351 84.3 9,303 129,851,100 9,091 14,283.48 129.9 9,091 49,990,200 9,314 5,367.21 50.0 9,314 119,484,585 9,328 12,809.24 119,484,585 9,281 12,874.11 119.5 9,328 119.5 9,281 199,995,480 9,021 22,169.99 200.0 9,021 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 199,910,820 9,225 21,670.55 199.9 9,225 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 59,772,000 9,387 6,367.53 59.8 9,387 9,996,000 9,356 1,068.41 10.0 9,356
92,381,500 8,980 10,287.47 92,381,500 9,038 10,221.45 92.4 8,980 92.4 9,038
189,200,000 9,338 20,262.38 189.2 9,338 187,000,000 9,028 20,713.34 187.0 9,028
134,722,000 9,356 14,399.53 134.7 9,356
136,238,000 9,338 14,590.41 136.2 9,338 184,250,000 9,338 19,731.21 184.3 9,338
109
126,789,500 9,356 13,551.68 126.8 9,356 G00425 17,250,000 9,030 1,910.30 17,250,000 9,010 1,914.54 17.3 9,030 17.3 9,010
105,600,000 9,338 11,309.24 105.6 9,338 98,299,000 8,975 10,952.53 98.3 8,975 176,000,000 9,338 18,848.73 176.0 9,338 214,500,000 8,975 23,899.72 214.5 8,975 113,564,000 9,338 12,162.14 113.6 9,338 96,675,000 8,975 10,771.59 96.7 8,975 135,272,000 9,338 14,486.96 135.3 9,338 123,595,000 9,338 13,236.41 123.6 9,338
199,972,020 9,225 21,677.18 200.0 9,225 G00425 29,404,560 9,020 3,259.93 29,404,560 9,028 3,257.04 29.4 9,020 29.4 9,028
137,295,500 9,028 15,207.74 137,295,500 8,763 15,667.64 137.3 9,028 137.3 8,763 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 49,999,992 9,338 5,354.46 50.0 9,338 198,863,280 9,298 21,387.75 198.9 9,298 199,974,060 9,298 21,507.21 200.0 9,298 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062
60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062
60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975 60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975 60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975
60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062
60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975
110
60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062
60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975 199,981,200 9,311 21,477.95 200.0 9,311 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338
200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 199,999,968 9,298 21,510.00 200.0 9,298 199,999,560 9,371 21,342.39 200.0 9,371 199,980,100 9,371 21,340.32 200.0 9,371 199,805,760 9,039 22,104.85 199.8 9,039 199,997,265 9,298 21,509.71 200.0 9,298 199,999,560 9,039 22,126.29 200.0 9,039 199,999,050 9,039 22,126.24 200.0 9,039 199,999,560 9,225 21,680.17 200.0 9,225 199,995,480 9,371 21,341.96 200.0 9,371
200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 199,999,560 9,039 22,126.29 200.0 9,039 199,981,200 9,311 21,477.95 200.0 9,311 199,999,560 9,371 21,342.39 200.0 9,371 199,999,050 9,371 21,342.34 200.0 9,371 199,916,940 9,039 22,117.15 199.9 9,039 199,998,540 9,298 21,509.85 200.0 9,298 199,995,990 9,039 22,125.90 200.0 9,039 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 199,999,560 9,039 22,126.29 200.0 9,039 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338 199,999,560 9,225 21,680.17 200.0 9,225
111
199,999,560 9,039 22,126.29 200.0 9,039 199,990,380 9,298 21,508.97 200.0 9,298
60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975 99,809,500 9,408 10,609.00 99,809,500 9,309 10,721.83 99.8 9,408 99.8 9,309 106,712,000 9,408 11,342.69 106,712,000 9,309 11,463.32 106.7 9,408 106.7 9,309 110,706,000 9,408 11,767.22 110,706,000 9,309 11,892.36 110.7 9,408 110.7 9,309 74,999,325 9,154 8,193.07 75.0 9,154 G00425 219,254,000 9,064 24,189.54 219.3 9,064 G00425 96,755,000 9,064 10,674.65 96.8 9,064
151,519,000 9,066 16,712.88 151.5 9,066 66,655,000 8,980 7,422.61 66.7 8,980 127,815,000 8,980 14,233.30 127.8 8,980 127,815,000 8,980 14,233.30 127.8 8,980
4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 74,978,500 9,309 8,054.41 75.0 9,309 74,980,000 9,345 8,023.54 75.0 9,345 74,999,580 9,372 8,002.52 74,999,580 9,281 8,080.98 75.0 9,372 75.0 9,281 74,984,280 9,217 8,135.43 74,984,280 9,281 8,079.33 75.0 9,217 75.0 9,281 74,995,500 9,225 8,129.59 74,995,500 9,309 8,056.24 75.0 9,225 75.0 9,309 74,972,000 9,345 8,022.69 75.0 9,345 29,995,000 9,217 3,254.31 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 74,978,500 9,309 8,054.41 75.0 9,309
74,973,125 8,975 8,353.55 75.0 8,975 74,942,460 9,356 8,010.10 74.9 9,356 29,995,000 9,217 3,254.31 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 74,932,700 9,225 8,122.79 74,995,500 9,309 8,056.24 74.9 9,225 75.0 9,309 37,499,790 9,154 4,096.55 37,499,790 9,309 4,028.34 37.5 9,154 37.5 9,309 199,991,400 9,357 21,373.45 200.0 9,357 29,982,500 9,217 3,252.96 29,982,500 9,309 3,220.81 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309
112
74,995,245 9,217 8,136.62 74,995,245 9,302 8,062.27 75.0 9,217 75.0 9,302 74,999,580 9,372 8,002.52 74,999,580 9,303 8,061.87 75.0 9,372 75.0 9,303 74,998,500 9,345 8,025.52 75.0 9,345
74,971,250 8,975 8,353.34 74,971,250 8,974 8,354.27 75.0 8,975 75.0 8,974 74,998,560 9,225 8,129.93 74,998,560 9,282 8,080.00 75.0 9,225 75.0 9,282 50,000,000 9,387 5,326.52 50.0 9,387 74,997,500 9,345 8,025.41 75.0 9,345
200,000,000 8,980 22,271.71 200.0 8,980 199,104,000 8,980 22,171.94 199.1 8,980 200,000,000 8,980 22,271.71 200.0 8,980 200,000,000 8,980 22,271.71 200.0 8,980 17,025,903 9,034 1,884.65 17,025,903 9,107 1,869.54 17.0 9,034 17.0 9,107 410,692,000 9,066 45,300.24 410.7 9,066
G00425 99,806,000 9,064 11,011.25 99.8 9,064
49,784,500 9,387 5,303.56 49.8 9,387
113