comprehensive planelibrary.pacounties.org/documents/allegheny_county/71; elizabeth...

TWIN RIVERS C.OUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DECEMBER 2003

SERVING THE COMMUNITIES

ELIZABETH BOROUGH, ELIZABETH TOWNSHIP, FORWARD TOWNSHIP, GLASSPORT BOROUGH, LIBERTY BOROUGH,

LINCOLN BOROUGH, MADISON BOROUGH, McKEESPORT CITY, PORT VUE BOROUGH, SOUTH VERSAILLES TOWNSHIP,

VERSAILLES BOROUGH, WEST MIFFLIN BOROUGH, WEST NEWTON BOROUGH, AND WHITE OAK BOROUGH

Assisted by

Graney, Grossman, Colosimo and Associates, Inc. and

Senate Engineering Company

TWIN RIVERS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN December 2003

SERVING THE COMMUNITIES

.’ j

.? . i

! . .

ELIZABETH BOROUGH, ELIZABETH TOWNSHIP, FORWARD TOWNSHIP, GLASSPORT BOROUGH, LIBERTY BOROUGH, LINCOLN BOROUGH,

MADISON BOROUGH, McKEESPORT CITY, PORT W E BOROUGH, SOUTH VERSAILLES TOWNSHIP, VERSAILLES BOROUGH,

WEST MIFFLIN BOROUGH, WEST NEWTON, BOROUGH AND WHITE OAK BOROUGH

Assisted by

Graney, Grossman, Colosimo and Associates, Inc. and

Senate Engineering Company

i

. ! ' i

-- , I . : : j

' -1 - . /

I

.. 1

Twin Rivers Council of Governments 2003

BOARD OF DIRECTORS John A. D'Angelo, President, Borough of Glassport

Thomas W. Headley, Vice President, Forward Township David L. Stockett, Secretary, South Versailles Township

Stewart E. Owens, Treasurer, Liberty Borough

Randy Shelton, Elizabeth Borough Regis Bazylak, Elizabeth Township William K. Kiger, Lincoln Borough Terrence Stec, Madison Borough

Frank Cortazzo, Port Vue Borough

Anita Gricar, Versailles Borough Edward Manfiedi, West Mifflin Borough

Daniel Palfey, West Newton Borough David Pasternak, White Oak Borough

REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Thomas W. Headley, Chairman, Forward Township

David L. Stockett, Vice Chairman, South Versailles Township Stewart E. Owens, Secretary, Liberty Borough

Randy Shelton, Elizabeth Borough Regis Bazylak, Elizabeth Township

John A. D'Angelo, Borough of Glassport Thomas Urbanski, Borough of Glassport

Dennis G. Derr, Liberty Borough Catherine Burchell, Lincoln Borough Ronald A. Rosche, Lincoln Borough

Terrence Stec, Madison Borough Thomas Miller, Madison Borough Laura Jenkins, City of McKeesport

Frank Cortazzo, Port Vue Borough William Betzner, Port Vue Borough

Merle Campbell, South Versailles Township Anita Gricar, Versailles Borough

Edward Manfiedi, West Mifflin Borough Howard Bednar, West Mifflin Borough Daniel Palfey, West Newton Borough George Sam, West Newton Borough David Pasternak, White Oak Borough Bruce Jamison, White Oak Borough

STAFF Rosemary Bradley, Executive Director

Carla Barron, Community Development Coordinator Diane Hawkins, Finance ManagedSecretary John Palyo, RecreatiodProgram Coordinator

The preparation of this report was financed in part through planning assistance grants from:

Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development Land Use and Planning Technical Assistance Program

Allegheny County Department of Economic Development Community Development Block Grant Program

Local Governments Academy

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Page

Preface Page 1

.. i i

i . i

. i

Community Development Objectives Transportation Land Use Urban Places Rural Areas Water and Sewer Housing The Economy

Other Plan Elements Statement of Compatibility Implementation Strategy Plan Interrelationships Energy Conservation

The Twin Rivers' Geographic Information System

Housing Plan Future Housing Needs The Need for Programs to Preserve the Housing Stock The Twin Rivers Assets Program Special Housing Needs Ongoing Needs

Economic Development Plan Economic Development

Land Use Plan Land Use Standards Subdivision Regulations Subdivision Design Standards The Future Land Use Plan Other Land Use Tools The Multi-Municipal Agreement

Transportation Plan Special Traffic Studies Mass Transit Signage Additional Recommended Highway Improvements

Page 3 Page 3 Page 4 Page 6 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 9 Page 9 Page 9

Page 10

Page 11

Page 15 Page 15 Page 17 Page 19 Page 21 Page 21

Page 23 Page 23

Page 29 Page 30 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 43 Page 44

Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 48

. I

Air Rail :I

I

Page 52 Page 52

Sanitary Sewage Page 53 Recommended Improvements Page 54

-i - 1

Public Water Supply

Community Facilities Plan Public Safety Parks and Recreation

Regional Recreational Park System Short-Term Recreational Needs Regional Training Complex Municipal Buildings

Recommended Improvements

Historic Resources Plan The National Register The Historic District Act Zoning and Codes Subsidizing Preservation

A Plan for the Protection of Natural Resources

Concurrent Plans Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan - Hazard Mitigation Alternative Mitigation Actions by Hazard Twin Rivers Council of Governments Comprehensive Plan - Hazard

Mitigation Plan

Tables

Table CF-1, Twin Rivers Council of Governments - Summary, Regional Sanitary SewedSewage Treatment Plant Improvements Estimate

Maos

4

Page 66 Page 66 Page 66 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 71 Page 71

Page 72 Page 72 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74

Page 75

Page 76 Page 77 Page 78

Page 80

Page 61

TRCOG Future Land Use Map TRCOG Transportation Plan Map TRCOG Water Service Areas Map

Follows Page 44 Follows Page 52 Follows Page 65

!

' I

. . ‘i

I

TWIN RIVERS

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

PREFACE

here is a popular saying that suggests that in today’s highly competitive T environment, business leaders must “think outside the box.” In reality, this is merely the most recent iteration on a long-standing principle. Change is constant, and communities as well as people must continually adapt to new circumstances. Certainly, this is excellent advice for the 14 municipalities of the Twin Rivers Council of Governments (TRCOG). To follow traditional planning tenets, to continue with business as usual, is hardly a viable option. Just a cursory examination of the findings of the Background Report supports that conclusion. Business as usual means a continued loss of both population and of viability. So, this Plan must offer some new ideas. Ideas that will capitalize on the assets at hand and better use existing resources. Ideas that will articulate the TRCOG’s needs, projects, and policies to local residents, area leaders, the Commonwealth, and, if need be, to Federal officials. And, there is much reason to believe that the policies, needs, and projects articulated by th.~s Plan will receive attention. Both the Commonwealth and Allegheny County have indicated that the TRCOG effort is viewed as a model for other communities to follow.

With h s philosophy in mind, the TRCOG Comprehensive Plan will borrow from new planning movements such as Smart Growth,

Sustainable Development, and Growing Greener. But, more than that, it will not hesitate to involve other agencies-public, semi-public, or private-in realizing its goals. Yet, it will also include traditional planning elements. Hopehlly, such a mixture of traditional approaches with innovative concepts will create the energy needed to realize Plan goals.

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan Page 1

i i

I I Finally, the Plan realizes that no single entity can re-energize an area on its own.

requiring the full participation of its constituent municipalities, the Allegheny and Westmoreland Counties, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the Federal government. Yet, beyond these many governmental agencies, the efforts of nonprofit agencies, individuals, and the private sector are needed for success. Recent hstory has demonstrated success is inclusive.

I The Twin Rivers Council of Governments is one element of an important network

2 1

, . .i

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Pfan Page 2

i

I

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES

he Twin Rivers is surely a diverse area. It presents a variety of physical developments, land forms, economies, and needs. Thus, the Community T Development Objectives must be flexible enough to meet the needs of the

Twin Rivers COG’S unique 14 municipalities. These Community Development Objectives are the result of numerous work sessions, Public Officials’ Workshop (spring of 2001.), and a Citizens Survey conducted in 2002.

Before specific objectives are discussed, it is well to first highlight some initial priorities and policies. Plan policies should always:

Benefit the Twin Rivers COG in a real way. This question should also be applied to all projects.

m Preserve, protect, or enhance the physical environment; specifically, production, farmlands, steep slopes, and riverfront areas deserve special attention.

Promote and improve the economic well being of the Area.

= Enhance the TRCOG quality of life.

Make every effort to promote economic equity to all TRCOG communities.

Capitalize on existing resources, governmental and private.

Transportation: Perhaps the overwhelming transportation concern for the Twin Rivers is that of Regional access. No major, four-lane, limited-access roads now exist which affords a direct link between the Twin Rwers COG Region and the Interstate Highway System. This transportation deficiency is seen as one causal effect of regional


economic difficulties. The Mon-Fayette Expressway and Southern Belt are presented as a possible solution to this shortcoming.

Highlights of the transportation goals:

m

rn

a

a

8

m

8

8

m

Create good access to the Interstate system for the Region.

Examine the TRCOG roads as a true network and lobby for traffic studies on links having capacity or geometric shortcomings.

Improve access to Port Vue and Liberty fi-om all directions.

Critically examine signage both fiom a safety aspect as well as for directions and area “branding.”

Relieve traffic congestion - Lincoln Way and Route 48.

Relieve traffic congestion in the McKeesport and Glassport area.

Lmprove Bunola River Road (Forward Township).

Improve bus schedules for workers, shoppers, and the elderly- McKeesport, Port Vue, and Glassport.

Construct a flyover ramp over rail lines for better access to the National Tube complex (McKeesport).

Improve intersection Route 48 and Lovedale Road (Elizabeth Township).

Construct linking road from Market Street to Walnut Street (McKeesport).

Traffic and safety improvements to all major routes in the Region.

Land Use: The Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan has a variety of land use considerations:

9 Several municipalities are urban in nature, with older settlement patterns.


There are several others that were developed after 1950 and have a more modem developmental context, but are also heavily developed.

Large land areas along the ridge tops between the rivers and in the south are primarily suburban or rural in nature.

In the southern areas of the TRCOG, especially in Lincoln Borough, Elizabeth Township, and Forward Township, productive farmland exists, which could be considered for additional Agricultural Security Areas.

Steep slopes and river edges deserve special attention relative to development standards.

The 12 Allegheny County municipalities can participate in a multi- municipal plan.

The two Westmoreland communities are isolated from each other and &om the 12 Allegheny County municipalities and will need separate land use plans.

All areas deserve quality development.

The following land use policies will be followed:

Urban Places:

Promote lnfill.

. Allow mixed land use areas with design guidelines.

. Develop urban design guidelines.

. Provide for alternative uses for threatened or deteriorating commercial areas.

. Make the permitting and approval process fair, predictable, and cost- .

effective to developers.


Ask for private-sector input into the multi-municipal zoning and land use ordinances.

Allow for a range of housing densities.

Develop traffic-calrmng standards for residentiavpedestrian areas.

Preserve quality historic structures by promoting compatible use alternatives.

Establish Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) and Historic Overlay options for urban places.

Consider tax benefits for new developments in selected urban places (LERTA).

Establish realistic older urban areas.

parking standards and shared parking options in

Rural Areas:

8 Clearly delineate rural resource areas fioni designated growth areas. . Identi@ fannland areas and develop appropriate guidelines to preserve farming operations.

8 Provide for Growing Greener-type options in zoning regulations and through conservation subdivisions.

. Coordinate land use, sewer, water, and transportation policies.

. . Promote selective acquisition by the Allegheny Land Trust.

Water and Sewer: The entire Area has water and sewer concerns. Sewer problems are critical for all municipalities, but especially for the 12 municipalities in Allegheny County. This is especially true as the EPA Phase I1 mandates relative to stormwater is now a priority. Beyond the specific needs is the ongoing problem of maintenance and routine improvements to aging systems. Individual issues include:


Port Vue Borough - {Jpgrade both sanitary and storm drainage problems.

South Versailles Township - Extend sewer lines-to allow for new development.

Fonvard and .Elizabeth Townships - Extend sanitary sewers to accommodate new development.

West Newton Borough - Eliminate sanitary system overflows.

Glassport Borough - Reduce storm drainage, and mine drainage into the municipal sanitary sewer system.

Lincoln Borough - Provide sanitary sewer service for additional development.

White Oak Borough - Alleviate stormwater problems on Lincoln way.

To a large extent, water service to the entire Area is in the hands of two utilities: the Westmoreland County Water Authority and the Pennsylvania-American Water Company. These facilities appear to have adequate capacity for any short- or long- term extensions, which may be needed. However, it must be noted that since 911 1 , water utilities only provide limited information. Consequently, only general recommendations can be offered in this category.

Housing: Housing goals in the TRCOG Area vary considerably between the communities. In the older municipalities such as McKeesport, Glassport, Elizabeth Borough, Versailles, and Port Vue, there are areas of deteriorated and sometimes dilapidated housing that require ongoing attention. In other areas, the accommodation of new homes is a concern. Specific objectives include:

. Continue anti-blight programs such as the Fresh Paint and Sidewalk Programs, which provide for the improvement of neighborhoods.

Provide for the beneficial reuse or conversion of older homes in a manner that benefits the community and attracts private investment (see Land Use).


:j

. . i

Promote new housing stock in urban and rural areas, which meets Area market needs while avoiding suburban sprawl. Guidelines to development should stress quality design and include housing for a variety of income levels.

. Develop a program to track vacant properties and abandoned structures to promote proper and productive reuse:

0 Establish a TRCOG GIS system.

0 Develop a multi-municipal property reuse strategy.

Establish a Regional marketing alliance with the real estate/ developers in the area to determine strategies for marketability and value.

Develop a TRCOG housing development corporation to create affordable, middle-market housing to attract new residents to the Area.

0 Work with Allegheny County and local municipalities to develop property acquisition strategies.

0 Review zoning and code provisions (see Land Use) to remove investment barriers with the TRCOG.

Turn to new public housing programs only as a last resort.

:.< . .. , I

3 i !

. . I

The Economy: If the TRCOG Area is to keep its population, attract new residents, and remain viable, it must develop a more robust economy. To most of the residents of the Area, this is translated into one word: jobs. And, jobs that pay well, not minimal wage employment. That means retaining current employers, fostering spin offs, and attracting new employers. Currently, there are five strategies used in most economic development programs in Pennsylvania. These include:

. Marketing

Tax abatement

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Pian Page 8 I .

. Property offers (both brownfield and greenfield)

... ... I.. , i

. Attractive financing programs (Le. below-market, junior lien loan programs)

. Training

Specific needs identified locally are:

. Full participation of the TRCOG Area in State and Regional economic development opportunities.

. Create good paying jobs. . Improve retail activity, especially in the older downtowns. . Reclaim and reuse brownfeld sites, especially in McKeesport and Glassport.

. Actively monitor the performance of economic development agencies in the TRCOG Area.

OTHER PLAN ELEMENTS

Statement of Compatibility: The development patterns proposed in this Plan are an extension of existing land uses. Consequently, no conflicts with the existing or proposed development patterns of contiguous municipalities is anticipated.

Implementation Strategy: The implementation strategies for Plan activities (immediate, ongoing, short tern, long tern) are covered in each Plan element.

Plan Interrelationships: This Plan is devised so that all Plan elements support the TRCOG Statement of Community and Development Objectives. As can be seen, these Plan elements are devised with two overall goals: return the older areas of the TRCOG to viability and to preserve the quality of life of the more rural areas. All activities are also meant to enhance the economic vitality of the TRCOG.

Twin' Rivers Comprehensive Plan Page 9 . - I

!

Energy Conservation: The Twin hvers Council of Governments is deeply committed to the policy of energy conservation. This Plan intends to promote energy conservation through three primary Plan elements: Land Use, Housing, and Transportation.

In land use, a strategy of mfill is promoted to re-use land in existing urban areas. This alleviates the need to extend utility lines and the construction activities required for such extensions. Not only is this fiscally prudent, but it will also prove energy-efficient, as the energy needed for the construction of water, sewer, and utility lines would not be needed.

Phase I1 of the Twin Rivers Plan deals with land use controls. These controls will encourage developers to site buildings to promote energy conservation via both solar orientation and the buffering from prevailing wind.

A more .apparent energy savings is with housing. Here, the TRCOG intends to become directly involved in housing development, via the Twin Rivers Housing Development Corporation. Consequently, the COG can, and will, specify energy- conscious specifications for insulation and HVAC installations.

The final element is also the most important, transportation. The traffic volume- generated in, and passing through, the Study Area is unbelievably large. Many roads have AADTs in excess of 15,000 vehcles a day. These vehicles travel on roads with low levels of traffic efficiency. Studies to facilitate better traffic movement, thereby promoting fuel efficiency, are part of this Plan. The Plan also supports the extension of bike trails along the “Mon” River to promote non- motorized transportation. Finally, the preservation of, and expansion of, transit services is a priority. This Plan element is very energy-sensitive.

This Plan is committed to sound energy planning.


THE TWIN RIVERS’ GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM

o accomplish the proposed Regional Comprehensive Plan, a Regional GIS (geographical information systems) system is not only advised, but is a T needed tool to achieve the goals that are set forth. GIS is no longer an

arcane and expensive computer application with more application to academia than government. These systems have become both affordable and user-friendly. For example, a single-user license copy of ArcView 8.3 now costs approximately $1,200, and a machme to run this software can be purchased in the $1,000 to $1,400 range, including a monitor. Printers and other peripherals would increase the cost, depending upon the options chosen, but these systems are now affordable.

Of course, the hardware and software is only one element of a GIS system. At least one trained person will be required. Over the past few years, nearly all of the colleges and universities within the area have courses in this field. In addition, the software company ESRI, and even the Penn State Extension Service, offers a variety of training courses. The TRCOG already has both ARC View software and some staff training.

However, the biggest lesson of GIS systems is their ongoing maintenance. Many municipalities have created a good basic GIS system, but have not had the finds or personnel to continually update, upgrade, and continue system maintenance. Ths is where the COG can be of assistance. The system must go beyond the initial GIS “gee-whiz” stage. To go beyond a few facile applications which are visually attractive but are not necessarily an effective management tool.

Obviously, this proposed addition to the already wide number of services that the TRCOG offers comes with two assumptions. The first is that either the Counties, the State, both, or a local foundation will assist in the initial funding of the effort, especially during the first year as the system is implemented, personnel receive additional training, and then the system configured for use. The second assumption is that once this system is in operation, it will either pay for itself or receive some type of continuing assistance.

!

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan Page I 1 I

The obvious question is why should this happen? Certainly, the local use of GIS is not new, nor innovative of and by itself. In fact, many municipalities have such a system-some in the TRCOG Area. The answer is twofold. First, it the concept that this one system can actually serve the 14 municipalities and will be so configured that it will be a truly two-way system. Though the primary files and data would be stored at the TRCOG offices, it will be "online" for the constituent municipalities to easily use.

The system should have the following capabilities:

.

. It must be parcel-based.

. It must geo&aphically cover the entire TRCOG Area.

The underlying database should use the property tax index number so that any fbture usage can use that unique number to relate additional information.

Each municipality must be able to easily use it.

. It must be open-ended so that new uses can be easily added.

Onginally, the system is envisioned to be one initially centered in land use and zoning. These are obvious and rather simple applications of such software. A second application also suggests itself, at least for some of the municipalities within the Region, that is the issuing of building permits. As the State-mandated building code is llkely to be in effect by 2004, this application would be timely as well as needed.

However, a host of other data keeping and management options suggest themselves to such a system.

. Road type, construction, condition, and history. A GIS system is ideally suited to identi6 stretches of road by pavement type (blacktop, concrete, gravel, etc.), right-of-way width, cartway width, condition, and date last paved. The advantage of the GIS approach is once the donnation on the road itself is entered, that characteristic can be inserted in a related database over a period of months or even years. PennDOT already uses such an approach. For local officials, it would provide a tool where a quick view of a computer screen could help to


71 i

1

.. i

! I

determine paving priorities, maintenance needs, and be of great assistance during budget time.

. Snow routes and priority plowing.

Another obvious addition is water and sewer infrastructure dormation. This could be as simple as a representational entry of the approximate location of such lines, to the importation of engineering drawings already available in a CAD format. . Community facilities and parks are another typical inventory usage. The size, facilities, and features of a park can be entered. This can be a management tool only, or a program devoted to a simple mouse click to display a map for TRCOG residentshisitors to view local recreation options. Easy links to county parks, the state park systems, and other facilities could be easily entered.

. Police and accident statistics are becoming more and more a typical GIS feature.

. A vacant-abandoned-property database (see Housing).

However, until such a system is up and running, these very practical uses cannot be applied. The advantage of a Regional system is that the local operators need only be trained for image access, and mformation retrieval. One shared, Mly trained operator can handle the more complex operations, such as the addition of GIS layers, the creation and relationships of the databases, system maintenance, program creation, and technical concerns.

The establishment of a Regional GIS system presents an opportunity for the TRCOG to present a powehl management tool to its constituent municipalities.

There has been much discussion of such systems over the past several years, and a variety of government entities have used them. A decade ago, GIS systems were expensive to develop due to the cost of software, hardware, and data assembly. Many of these objections have been overcome. And, as a result, some localities do have such operation. However, they tend to be isolated and primarily are found in affluent communities. This is a chance for a Regional organization to offer a very usable system to its constituents of all economic needs and of all sizes. Th~s initiative comes at an opportune time for Allegheny County, as it is now re-


?

I I i energizing its GIS program. Real partnership opportunities exist. Once in place,

i COGS in Allegheny County. tested, and running, the TRCOG program can be used as a model for the other

1

I


HOUSING PLAN

I

uture Housing Needs: The future population of any community is the basis for its hture housing needs. And, this is true for the Twin Rivers F Study Area. According to the Census, there were 38,637 occupied dwelling

units in the year 2000. The total dwelling inventory was 41,710. Vacancies amounted to 3,073 units, or 7.4% of the housing stock. Of the vacancies, only a small number were seasonal. For the purpose of future housing needs projection, a more conservative vacancy rate of 5% will be used (about that of Allegheny

I

-1

/

1 I

County).

c :z

A second aspect to consider is the number of persons in some type of group quarters. Between 1990 and 2000, the group quarter population increased in the Study Area by nearly 500 persons (35%) to 1,876 persons. For the purpose of the housing needs projection, th~s number is expected to increase to about 2,000 persons, and then remain constant. This assumption is predicated on the fact that most of the “de-institutionalization” from various State hospitals has been essentially complete. It is assumed that hture growth in the institutional segment will be primarily in nursing homes.

The final aspect of the housing needs projection is that of household size. In 1990, the average household size in the Study Area was 2.44 persons; by 2000, this had dropped 3.2%, to 2.36 persons per household. Such a reduction in household size is typical in Western Pennsylvania though, nationally, this trend varies greatly. In areas experiencing heavy in-migration, household sizes are growing. However, this is not the case in Western Pennsylvania. Consequently, a continued modest decrease in household size is projected.

Finally is the issue of losses to the housing stock. Between 1990 and 2000, some 1,480 dwelling units were lost (Census data) in the Twin Rivers Area. Most of this decrease was the result of demolitions, notably in the McKeesport area. As the housing stock in the entire Area is old (much built before 1940), ongoing losses can be expected. However, an annual average of nearly 150 units appears excessive. This factor was decreased to 80 units per year, or about 0.2% annually of the housing stock.

!

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan 1

!

Page IS

1 I !

In summary, hture housing needs are forecast using the following factors (all i figures rounded):

i 1 . Expected household population i

. Persons per household . Dwelling unit attrition 9

-1 A nominal vacancy rate of 5 percent i

Expected household population: i i 1 gj 2010 88,700* - 2000 (group quarters) 86,700

2020 89,300* - 2000 (group quarters) 87,300

*These numbers were taken by averaging SPC and GGCA population projections (see Background Report).

-1 i

I Net dwelling unit needs:

2010 86,700 + 2.24* = 38,700 2020 87,300 + 2.17' = 40,200

*Average persons per dwelling unit

Units lost to attrition 1

2000 to 2010 800 2010 to 2020 800

1. Housing units required in 2010 - 40,700. Housing units expected to be available - 40,900.

I

2. Housing units required in 2020 - 42,300. Units expected to be available - 40,100. Net need - 2,200 units.

Consequently, if there is no significant deviation fiom current population trends, the total housing market demand fiom 2000 to 2010 is expected to be flat. Ths is

housing attrition. From 2010 to 2020, a modest population increase is forecast. That increase, coupled with a continuing reduction in household size and the

I I based upon a decrease in population that will offset smaller household sizes and j

1 !

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan ' I

Page 16

I

..*, r :!

ongoing loss of units by attrition should create a IO-year need of 2,200 dwelling units.

All of t . h ~ assumes all current trends will remain in place. Though these projections are quite theoretical in nature, they do provide a baseline figure for the Twin Rivers housing market.

However, if no actions are taken, a more ldcely scenario can be expected that:

8 Older urban places such as the City of McKeesport as well as Glassport and Elizabeth Boroughs will experience higher than 5% vacancy rates.

8 The more rural areas, especially Forward and Elizabeth Townships, will experience housing growth via new subdivisions, especially as sanitary sewer service becomes available.

8 The remaining areas will experience some increases and decreases which will likely balance out.

The Need for Programs to Preserve the Housing Stock: With the loss of housing units between 1990 and 2000 (essentially in older urban areas) and over 12,000 dwelling units in the Study Area 60 or more years old, there is an obvious need for continuing efforts to maintain the housing stock.

8 Demolition: It appears that this approach is contrary to housing stock preservation. However, in the short term, demolition is needed. Dilapidated structures present a severe blighting duences on neighborhoods. Abandoned units can discourage investment in nearby homes, can present safety hazards, and sometimes attract undesirables.

8 Rehabilitation: For many years, the Federal Community Development Block Grant funds and HOMES grants have been used for housing rehabilitation needs programs. Often, these programs have focused on total housing rehabilitation and have become increasingly expensive. Over the past five years, the average cost of rehabilitation, per unit, in Western Pennsylvania has risen fiom under $15,000 to $20,000 plus. Then, approximately two years ago, certain additional Federal regulations relative to lead-based paint were

1


I

introduced. This has further increased “rehab” cost by $10,000 to $15,000 per unit. Consequently, the average cost of a total single-unit rehabilitation can easily fall into the $25,000 to $35,000 range. And, this often does not address the exterior appearance. Because of such cost, this traditional approach does not make sense in the TRCOG Area, as an expenditure of $1,000,000 might well only result in the rehabilitation of 30 to 35 housing units. Recopzing that McKeesport has its own program and the fact Madison and West Newton are in Westmoreland County, it still leaves nearly 29,000 units in the net TRCOG housing service area. Annually, the “rehab” of 35 units equals only 0. 1%-not great enough to make a real impact.

Conversely, the Fresh Paint and Sidewalk Programs, now used by the TRCOG, have much more modest costs and result in an exterior, visual benefit to the community. For the upcoming program year, the cost limits will be $2,500 for the Fresh Paint Program and $1,500 for the Sidewalk Program; a possible total expenditure, per unit, of $4,000. Using the theoretical $1,000,000 in program funds, combined, these programs could address 250 or more units annually. This is seven to eight times the result of the full rehab program. That level could approach 1% of the total housing stock and over a multi- year period make a sipficant impact.

The foregoing measures the effectiveness of the Fresh Paint, Sidewalk Programs in theory. They are, in fact, viable programs.

The TRCOG is able to service 32 homes in their current program year, with over 40 on a waiting list. The need for thls program is ongoing, and should be expanded. If funding were increased to $500,000 per year, there is little doubt its impact could be seen quite quickly. If the net number of problem units 5% of the total housing

- stock (excludmg McKeesport), a need of 1,500 units is seen. At 125 units per year, nearly 8% of all units in need could be addressed annually. Over a 10-year period, a good portion of the deteriorated housing stock could at least receive a facelift. Of course, admimstrative funds would be needed and not all units could be helped. Yet, h s does represent a very real option to have a positive visual impact on the TRCOG Area. And, with some cooperation, there is no reason Madison and West Newton could not benefit from this program.

” i

I


Up to h s point, the Plan has concentrated upon traditional, almost status quo, policies and programs. However, if the TRCOG is to pursue a program of population stabilization and stimulate real growth, more aggressive actions are needed.

The Twin Rivers Assets Program: This program is designed to view all vacant properties, abandoned homes, and tax-titled properties as possible community assets. It requires the use of the TRCOG GIS system. Essentially, it will focus on the older communities. All municipalities would be invited to participate.

Phase I: Using parcel-based maps, identify vacant, tax title, and abandoned properties. Th~s program can work in both Allegheny and Westmoreland County; however, due to differences in the treatment of tax title and sheriff sale property, Allegheny County presents a special challenge. Many Twin Rivers communities related the difficulty they experience in attempts to acquire abandoned properties. This is primarily caused by Allegheny County procedureshaws and the attitude of other taxing boles, primarily school districts. These are &%cult problems that must be resolved if this program is to succeed. But, the reward would be dramatic.

Though the acquisition of tax-titled properties offers one option, it need not be the only one. In some communities, cleared vacant properties already exist. The Patterson property in Glassport is one such area, which Glassport officials relate could accommodate up to 126 new housing units.

Phase 2: Ask local developers and real estate agents to participate in a workshop on housing.

rn

rn

rn

rn

This group

Seek to identify:

Strong market areas

Weak market areas

Unmet needs

Persons willing to serve on a TRCOG housing task force

should review the results of the property identification in Phase 1 to determine the most promising development sites that are available.


Phase 3: Search out developers who have successfully used government programs focused on moderate to middle-income home rentershuyers. Those of the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency (PHFA) are one such option. Often such sources have greater income flexibility than those that based on Federal standards. For example, the PHFA Single-Family Program allows mortgages up to $189,000 for a new home in Allegheny County, and families of three or more can earn up to $65,000 annually. Conversely, the “D “LMI” limit for a family of three in Allegheny County is $38,950, only some 40% the PHFA standard. Furthermore, while there are various HUD-based housing initiatives, and the private market focused on those with hgher incomes, few are at the middle ground-a good starting point for housing in the Twin Rvers Area. Marketing to true middle-income residents would translate into high returns for local taxing bodies.

Phase 4: Analyze the prior two steps to determine housing opportunities for the TRCOG Area. This should include single-family and townhouse developments, not just multi-family complexes.

Phase 5: Set up neighborhood meetings to discuss tentative housing initiatives during the preliminary stages. Address concerns-involve the neighborhood. Respect historic assets-try to keep projects affordable to moderate-middle-income persons.

Identify possible projects and project areas.

Phase 6: Partnering: Review possible private-sector partners. Consider an RFP process. Form a formal alliance with developers’ to initiate and finalize projects.

Phase 7: Examine the problems of land assemblage, tax lien problems, eminent domain, etc. Work with legislators to devise processes or change laws to convert unused real estate parcels to assets.

Phase 8: Contact the Allegheny County Redevelopment Authority, if needed, for land assemblage and disposition needs.

To facilitate such housing development, the creation of the Twin Rivers Housing Development Corporation is needed. Such a corporation should help to facilitate projects, especially if some type of public assistance is required.

This process is primarily intended to “kick start” new housing construction in the older urban areas of the TRCOG. It is assumed the private marketplace, unaided,


-7 : 1 .il

I

will continue to build developments in the suburban and rural areas. However, if those areas see a benefit to more middle-income units, there is no reason to exclude them.

Special Housing Needs: As the Area population ages, more comprehensive housing options are needed. These usually involve a combination of independent living, assisted living, and nursing home care on a single campus. Such facilities are visually attractive, good neighbors, and allow current or former area residents to “age in place.” The majority of such facilities are developed and operated by church or nonprofit agencies. This is due to the fact such agencies often have a financial and administrative resource to build and adminrster such projects. In upcoming years, such housing should be attractive in the Study Area.

In addition, some TRCOG municipalities have expressed interest in various forms of housing for older residents, primary market-based. Rather than a “continuum of care” project, there is interest in patio homes or apartments for those aged 55 or older. How can these facilities be encouraged? First, collect demographic data to identifjl a local market.

Then, invite possible sponsors in the TRCOG Area to a seminar on such facilities. Ask existing Regional facilities to provide speakers, tips, and background on the construction and successful operation of these developments. Look for developers, architects, or builders who specialize in such projects. Together, this combination should generate a critical mass of interest.

If real interest is generated, work with potential sponsors to prepare a “bankable” feasibility/market study. If warranted, assist projects to hition.

Ongoing Needs: Other needed ongoing housing activities:

8 Code Enforcement - Continue and expand th.~s effort.

Adopt property maintenance codes.

8

8

Continue and promote First-Time Homebuyers’ Program.

Examine modular homes as an alternative to stick-built units.

I


i .!

i

I

. Upgrade standards for mobile home parks (land rental communities) to make them more visually compatible with traditional housing (see Land Use).

i

. .

i I

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Pian Page 22 I

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN

conomic Development: Traditionally, thls topic is not part of a comprehensive plan. However, it is of such importance it is critical to include it in the Twin Rivers COG Plan. To retain population and to attract

new residents in contemporary society, there are two primary qualities: good job opportunities and quality of life.

Economic development has become an increasingly popular activity of state, regional, and local organizations. This popularity has fostered a plethora of economic agencies, programs, and projects across Pennsylvania and in the Pittsburgh region. A quick review of the Pittsburgh Regional Alliance or the Southwest Pennsylvania Commission web site reveals the name, number, and variety of economic development agencies.

An examination of the Background Report demonstrates why these issues are important. Table 28 shows there are only three municipalities in the Twin Rivers Area whose median household income exceeds the State level. However, there are six municipalities whose median incomes are less than 80% of the State median. And, a few that are very low. At $23,715, McKeesport is a good example of this disparity.

Consequently, the issue is twofold. What to do, and how to do it?

Beyond the statistical issues of income previously presented, there is a more critical question: What economic sectors currently are generating employment in the TRCOG Area? Accordmg to the 2000 Census, the greatest percentage of jobs are in Retail Trade, followed by Heath Services and Manufacturing. Combined, these three account for about one half of all jobs. A review of current major employers c o b s that finding that these three sectors are important. Some leading TRCOG employers, by category, include:

Manufacturina/lndustrial:

Consolidated Coal Vista Metals Chem-Ply SeimanslWestinghouse


I

! i

1

Elizabeth Carbide Westinghouse

I !

i usx I Fisher Body

I

Qi

Retail Trade:

Century I11 Mall Giant Eagle Foodland Olympia Shop and Save Scozio’s Shop and Save

Senrice:

McKeesport Hospital The School Districts are all major employers

The general truisms of economic development are:

= Most jobs are created by existing, local, finns by expansion, spin-offs, or subcontracting.

. Generally, manufacturing jobs pay the best, service jobs are usually next, while retail jobs pay modestly.

I

Following that reasoning, the initial focus should be on the retention and creation

Regional focus on hgh-tech and biotech; however, the needed university and medical resources common in the City of Pittsburgh are not found locally.

Various studies have identifilkd industrial clusters in the Southwestern PennsylvanialPittsburgWMon Valley area. These include:

! of traditional manufacturing employment. This maybe somewhat contrary to the 4 +-

i

I ! i

I = Information technology

. .

I

. Biomedicahiotechnology

Manufacturing


. Advanced manufacturing*

8 Advanced materials (including plastics)

9 Hospitality

8 Finance

*Finns with significant R&D resources.

Though different studies may focus on different segments of the economy, both the Regional Economic Revitalization Index (1999) and the draft Economic Overview (Mt. Auburn Association) seem to be in general agreement on the applicable clusters.

In Pennsylvania, economic programs geared toward industry normally have three primary components: land and buildings, low interest loans (usually for property, machmery, or equipment), and training. A fourth component is tax abatement, either through LERTA efforts or the State’s KOZ, KOEZ, or KOIZ programs

The Commonwealth Business Calling Program complements these program resources. That effort is part of Team Pennsylvania’s activities and involves calling on industries to determine their current status, future needs, and identify problems. In the Twin Rivers Area, the Southwest Planning Commission (SPC) is in charge of the Call Program.

One of the problems of the TRCOG Area is they are not now fully a part of the economic development infrastructure. There are various options available. Many communities have created their own economic development organization. In Pennsylvania, this normally entails the creation of an industrial development corporation (IDC). Such corporations are quasi-public institutions that can buy, develop, sell, and lease land for business purposes. However, this is a highly competitive field. To operate a successful economic development corporation takes money, personnel, and a multi-year commitment. At this point, this strategy does not suggest the creation of another “IDC.” But, it does see the need for a TRCOG staff person to be solely focused on traditional areas of economic development. Currently, all staff resources are assigned to existing programs and a


new person will be needed. Funding for a two-to-three-year period should be requested fiom Allegheny County, local foundations, or the State (DCED). Why? Because the numerous economic agencies and programs now are only impacting the Twin Rivers Area in an episodic and peripheral manner. A good example was the recent KO12 tax abatement program. A formal presentation to the TRCOG was never made to determine if there were possible sites in the Region, and, though an area in Glassport was selected, it was not done as part of a TRCOG strategy. Simply stated, Twin kvers must become a player in the economic development field to promote local employment and benefit local businesses. This is the first step in Year 1.

The initial duties of an economic staff person would highlight manufacturing/ industrial assistance:

Creating key liaisons with SPC, the Allegheny County of Economic Development, RIDC, DCED, SPEDD, and other key agencies. This will be through calls, contacts, and meetings.

Aslung to assist SPC locally in the Call Program for the TRCOG Area.

IdentifLing individual company needs and act as an advocate for these h s .

Identifjlng possible greenfield industrial parks or brownfield projects in the TRCOG Area. There already exist in the TRCOG Area some sites that might be considered. The “Patterson” property in Glassport may be such a candidate. A second area is land to the north of the Allegheny County m o r t . Part of that area is now being used as a gravel pit. A light industrial park, especially one related to the air facility, would be ideal here. Finally, an area in Forward at the Village of Axelton has a potential. It would be near the cwrent municipal building. In this instance, an urban redevelopment approach is needed.

The creation of a Twin Rivers IDC should be a last consideration.

These steps would be in program years two and three.

Not all economic developments need be industrial. The most promising source of new service jobs is UMPC-McKeesport, a 216-bed hospital, whose service area extends beyond the TRCOG. The facility hosts a Womansplace and is part of the

Page 26 Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan

: I

!

PACE network for elderly patients. It also has residency programs for family practice and internal medicine. These facilities can encourage the location of support services near the hospital. Private doctor offices, X-ray labs, magnetic imaging, and rehab centers are often satellite private operations. And, the health service area can create good paying jobs.

The retail sector is primary market-hven and no special assistance is suggested for the major strip malls, Century 111, or big-box outlets. Conversely, the downtowns in many of the older villages and boroughs are languishing. The typical programs to assist such places include facade treatments, expanded parking, joint marketing, and business recruitment. Assistance is available via Pennsylvania’s Main Street Program. In the TRCOG, there is the potential of creating a multi-municipal program. West Newton cwently has such an effort [Downtown West Newton Incorporated (DWNI)] and would be a good resource to consult with potential participants. However, the success of Main Street efforts has been quite varied. Before formally considering h s step, an objective study is needed to:

Identifj needs

Determine possible actions

Determine the feasibility

rn Determine market areas

DCED has a Main Street planning grant program that can assist in such an endeavor. The economic development specialist should:

Contact municipalities to determine real interest.

= Convene a meeting explaining the planning program as well as the resulting five-year Main Street Program. A DCED representative as well as leaders from the DWNI and other existing Main Street communities should be invited to share experiences and ideas.

Those municipalities interested can then join together, and under the TRCOG umbrella, apply for the downtown-planning grant-the needed first step in this process. If successfbl, an implementation grant can be secured and a shared Main Street Manager retained.


There are two municipalities that could immediately benefit fi-om the Main Street Program, Elizabeth and Glassport Boroughs. Both have traditional downtowns with little parking. Neither has a specific downtown plan, which could target activities to improve customer parking and fkther lack an overall design theme.

If there is one area that represents a potential unrealized benefit, that is tourism, especially in the West Newton area. Though the You&ogheny River trail is clearly marked, it is isolated from the Borough by the “Yough” River and a lack of signs/connections. Though no one strategy can be a key to a successfid strategy, the connection of the “Yo~gh” to downtown West Newton would be an important link to capture restaurant and retail spending. A few concepts:

Signage from the trail to the Borough’s downtown.

m Opening vistas from the trail to the east side of the river.

. Bridge improvements for access.

The “Downtown” effort should begin in Year 1 and move to the action phase in year two.

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan

.- . , - ~ _ _ _ . ..

Page 28

LAND USE PLAN

I .

.. L

L and use planning in Pennsylvania has experienced some exciting advances since the turn of the century. In 2000, the Pennsylvania General Assembly 'passed Acts 67 and 68, making dramatic changes to the Pennsylvania

Municipalities Planning Code (PaMPC). These amendments contain key provisions that allow planning efforts to be more effective and facilitate multi- municipal planning. They:

= Promote multi-municipal planning and tie these efforts to zoning in a unique manner.

. Formally require State agencies to consider local, regional, and county plans.

. Create stronger relationships between local and county planning efforts.

These changes are certainly beneficial to the TRCOG. In prior years, the only method to effectively implement joint land use planning was through joint zoning. Unfortunately, joint zoning was a singularly unpopular and unused planning tool. For an area such as the Twin Rivers, such an approach had M e r complications, due to the great variety of local conditions and needs. It is obvious the concerns of Elizabeth and Forward Townships are quite different from those of McKeesport or West Mifflin. Yet, the multi-municipal plan offers benefits to most Twin Rivers municipalities.

The only communities that cannot fully benefit from this new option are Madison and West Newton in Westmoreland County. As these municipalities are not contiguous to the other COG communities, they cannot utilize fiom the land use sharing provisions of a multi-municipal plan (see Section 107 of the PaMPC).

The basic policies for the Twin Rivers Land Use Plan are as follows:

= Preserve important farmland areas, natural assets, and scenic resources.

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan 1 .i

. . .

Page 29

Promote infill in urban places-use the ‘Traditional Neighborhood Development as one tool for this task.

Allow for a range of housing types and densities.

Promote fair, predictable, and cost-effective permitting practices.

Introduce traffic calming options.

Protect steep slope areas.

Use “Smart Growth” and “Growing Greener” options as needed.

Coordinate land use policies with other plan elements.

The land use program should start immediately.

Land Use Standards: In order to create a true multi-municipal plan, a commonality of standards is needed. These will be developed as Phase I1 of the TRCOG Comprehensive Plan and will be fashioned to provide TRCOG zoning and subdivision and land development ordinances (SALDO) (with appropriate options) so the 12 contiguous Allegheny County communities can take advantage of land use sharing options now open to them. For the two Westmoreland municipalities, Phase I1 will offer ordinance-specific recommendations. The following outline represents the basic standards for this Plan:

1. Preserve Natural Assets, Important Farmland, and Key Scenic Assets: These concerns will primarily focus in the more rural areas of the Twin Rivers and along key reaches of the Monongahela and You&ogheny Rivers.

a. Growincl Greener:.

The most obvious zoning approach to conserve both natural and scenic assets is to consider the Growing Greener approach. This technique should be included as an option under the zoning ordinance and reflected as conservation subdivisions in a SALDO.


Growing Greener is presented as an option to the developer, but as a permitted use. In this fashion, the developer realizes that special hearings before the governing body or the zoning hearing board, and the delays that such hearings may well engender are not required.

However, the Growing Greener concepts entail new thought processes for both the municipality and the developer. Under “Growing Greener,” a development is first analyzed to determine its net density. That is the number of lots the development would yield exclusive of non-buildable land. The traditional zoning density for that district is then applied to determine the net yield of the land.

Then the developer is presented with various density bonuses tied to development options. These range from estate lots to enhanced conservation development. By opting for conservation development, the developer is given density

Growing Greener c:, .............. .;,,.;; ....... ;;,,, :., .. .I . .:

, . , , , . ..*.._.....,...,. I . . . . ........... .I.. . ............. .....................

>.:,,._. . . . . . . . . . .I... .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......................... ........ ~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .__ ..... _ . ........ ......,. . . . . . . . . I: 1 . . . I . , . . ,.,. .., - .... ~ ..... ...... I . . .~. .............................. :. ..... I ........ .,* , . . L ..

bonuses where his yield, in terms of home sites, is increased. Depending upon the option taken, the number of homes allowed can double. The “payback” to the community is the conservation of scenic views, open space, or environmentally important land and ultimately higher tax valuations for developed areas. The hallmark of this concept is for the municipality (planning commission and governing body) to physically visit the proposed development site and to protect its important characteristics as the key to design.

The Growing Greener approach cannot easily be discussed in a few paragraphs. To best understand it, the DCNR “Growing Greener” handbook should be consulted. (See also the Conservation Subdivision in “Subdivision Standards. ’3

b. Low-Density Zoninrr-Conservation Districts: This represents a more standard option for rural protection of low-density lots, usually one to two acres per use. This would be similar to the current Rural Residential, Agriculture, or Conservation Districts already in use locally.


C. Protectina Scenic Assets: For those municipalities that are especially concerned with preserving rural scenic areas and vistas, there are additional land use controls, which may be considered:

i . a

.!

Signage Control: Signs can be controlled relative to size and location as long as these controls are reasonable.

Designation of key “viewsheds.”

Protection of RiDarian Areas: Riparian areas are lands found along rivers and streams. Their protection is not a common practice in Western Pennsylvania land use, but is followed in other areas. Regulations can involve some very detailed standards or be as simple as banning development within a specified &stance fiom stream banks. Such regulations can be included in zoning ordinances and are suggested where quality streams are found. The purpose of the stream buffer is to trap sediment and pollution in runoff before the runoff reaches the stream.

d.

e. Steep Slopes: In nearly every area of the TRCOG, except perhaps Madison, steep slopes can be found. In some instances, these areas can be built upon with care; in other instances, development should be avoided. Generally, construction on slopes of 16% or greater is questionable and for areas of more than 25%, it should be discouraged. (See Acquisition of Sensitive Land in this section.)

f. Special Protection for Aaricultural Lands: Although the Census Bureau may regard Allegheny County as a Metropolitan Area, portions are still engaged in active agricultural productions. The previously discussed “Growing Greener” options can be used to retain agricultural land, but that is not a prime purpose of that option. There are two other alternatives that can effectively protect fannland: true Agricultural Protection Zoning ( A P Z ) and the Agricultural Security Arefirchase of Agricultural Conservation Easement (PACE) programs.

True Agricultural Protection Zoning uses a fixed area-based allowance or a slidmg scale area-based allowance. These approaches are followed in Lancaster and York Counties. They limit the number

%in Rivers Comprehensive Plan Page 32

2.

of new dwelling units in selected farm areas, based upon the size of individual farms. Generally, this is expressed at a set acreage (one new dwelling unit per 25 acres), or parcel size (example, three dwelling units per 15-30 acres). However, the APZ appears unwarranted in the TRCOG.

The second approach, the Agricultural SecurityPACE program, involves the acquisition of development rights from agricultural operations. That option provides a permanent reservation of agricultural use without detailed local regulations. Furthermore, it compensates the landowner to forego development. Th~s program already is functioning in the Area, particularly in Forward Township. In fact, a Forward Township official is on the Allegheny County Agricultural Security Board. This is important, as PACE, though a State program, hct ions through the County. (See other recommendations in this section.)

Promote Urban Infill: Though all municipalities of the Twin Rivers Council of Governments have lost population over the past decades, the more urban areas have experienced the greatest losses. One new planning tool that can be used to promote cost-effective urban infill while still stressing quality development is Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) (see PaMPC, Article VILA). In fact, both the implementation of multi-municipal plans [Section 701 -A(a)(7)] and urban infill [Section 705- A(3)] are stated purposes of thrs new zoning option. Some of the key characteristics of the TND are:

a. The governing body can designate a site-specific TND, either as an Overlay or an Outright Zone.

b. The Overlay Zone does not need to be considered as a'conditional use.

C. Specific power to apply the TND to either urban infill areas to the outgrowth of existing development, including development.

d. Clear authority to mfonnally review the sketch setting.


contiguous municipal

plan in a non-binding

Page 33

3.

4.

e. Written and graphic design guidelines may be prepared and adopted by ordinance.

f. The design of structures may be included in standards and conditions.

9. Allows for some variation from subdivision standards.

To be effective for the TR Area, this approach must be reasonable, allow for a mix of uses, and require quality design. In order to accommodate developers, the processing of TNDs should be as predictable as possible.

One needed element will be a formally adopted design manual. The American Planning Association report, Design Review (1 995), presents a good overview of such manuals. Design considerations include:

. Pedestrian circulations . Compatibility with existing development Design to promote street character . Parking area design . Building design include outline, forms, bulk, faqade, and orientation . Signage . Amenities (i.e. landscaping, access, etc.)

The danger in this approach is the design onerous so as to discourage its use. This

possible public areas, general

and review process could be so must be guarded against, as the

TND intent is to promote good urban infill, not to demonstrate elitist design concepts.

Promote a Variety of Housing Types and Densities: The current zoning ordinances of the TRCOG community already allow for a wide mix of housing densities, from single-family units on one-acre lots to dense, high rise, multi-family developments. Consequently, no change in existing zoning density practices are needed.

Introduce Traffic Calming Concepts: Although efficient, regional transportation access is a cornerstone of this Plan, uncontrolled automobile usage can be a detriment to residential neighborhoods (new or old) as well as


pedestrian-related commercial areas. Some design concepts to provide for a friendlier environment include:

a. For new residential development, purposely "undef7 designed new road systems. Curving, narrow, roadways with sharp comers can discourage speeding cars and through traffic. Randall Arendt in his watershed book, Rural By Design (Planners Press 1994), devotes the entirety of Chapter 11 on street design for rural subdivisions making precisely this point.

I

.ii -_

b. Consider traffic calmtng measures for shopping areas designed for pedestrian traffic. Traffic calming is a catch phrase that describes a number of possible design options used to slow, or control, traffic. These options include:

> . I

:'[

Speedhumps 0 Medial barrier

Textured pavement Neckdowns (see illustration) Chokers (see illustration)

and numerous other options. More details can be found at the Tr&cCalming.org web site or a book on such techniques published by the Institute of Traffic Engineers (Washington, D.C.). Sometimes, this can be instituted in a downtown street redevelopment plan. Also, design standards can be introduced in traditional neighborhood development ordinances or in subdivision and land development ordinances.

CHOKERS NECKDOWNS

j i 5. Use Patterns: For the sake of a common concept of zoning use districts,

i the following outline is provided:

\

;

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan I

i I

Page 35

. I : I

a. Residential Sinale-Family, Suburban Residential: These two districts are similar in use patterns, though distinct in density. They are both intended to function primarily as a place for single-family homes and complementary uses with few other uses permitted.

Uses

Single-Family Dwellings Schools* Churches * Public Parks and Playgrounds* Home Offices** Family Day Care

*Note, these uses should be buffered fiom nearby residential uses.

**This use is in-home offices with little to no client visits and no real need for signage, similar to the “no impact, home-based business” (see Act 43 of 2002).

b. ResidentiaVUrban: These districts are primarily designed for boroughs, cities, and villages.

Uses

Single-Family Dwellings Public Parks and Playgrounds Churches* Family Day Care Home OfficeMome Occupations* Schools* Conversion Apartments * Duplexes*

*With conditions to minimize potential negative effects of these uses.

c. Villaae/Residential. Limited Business: Similar to the previous district, these are aimed at built-up urban places, large or small,


!

especially those areas on or near major transportation corridors. In this district, some non-retail commercial uses are permitted. It is truly a mixed-use urban area. By not allowing retail or restaurants’ nighttime activity, conflicts with residential uses can minimized.

Uses

Single-Family Dwellings Two-Family Dwellings Three- and Four-Family Dwellings Day Care of all lunds Churches and Schools Small Offices for insurance, lawyers, accountants, etc. Services, such as barber and beauty shops, limited medical/ dental clinics, and other activities such as funeral homes Personal Care Boarding Homes Bed and Breakfast

d. Medium- and Hiah-Densitv Residential: The districts are presented together because the only distinction is the densityhtensity of use. In the Medium-Density District, many types of residential uses are allowed, along with complementary non-residential uses. For the High-Density Residential, all types of high-density residential development are appropriate.

Uses

Single-Family Dwellings Duplexes Three- and Four-Family Dwellings Multi-Family, including “High-Rise” Apartments” Parks and Playgrounds Schools Home Office/Home Occupation All Kmds of Day Care Churches

*In R-3, high-density residential districts only


e. Commercial Districts: For the purpose of this Plan, the following guidelines are set forth for three separate Commercial Districts. However, they need not all be present in a single ordinance to be judged consistent. Rather, the inclusion of such districts will be a function of the type of municipality. Some may include all basic types (i.e., larger and more urban places), while other, more rural, areas perhaps host only a single zone. These are General Commercial, Downtown Commercial, and Highway Commercial.

General Commercial: This district includes both a General Commercial District as well as Neighborhood Commercial ’areas. For smaller boroughs, it could even include a “downtown” of limited size. The main function of such districts is to provide for a variety of retail and service uses:

Uses

Retail Sales Convenience Stores Banks and Financial Services Eating and Drrnking Establishments Personal and Professional Services Medical and Dental Services Automotive Services

Commercial Highway: This district would include all of the General Commercial uses, plus the following:

Uses

Drive-Mhrough Facilities for Banks, Fast Food, Restaurants, and Related Retail Building Supply Yards Home and Garden Centers Shopping Centers Car Washes S elf4 t orage Faci 1 it ies Motels Malls and Strip Plazas Professional Offices

I i 1

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan ! i

-I

Page 38

Downtown Commercial: This district is intended to function in dense urban centers. Lot sizes are usually minimal, front yards are often not required, and parking is normally provided by public facilities.

Uses

Retail of All Kinds Personal and Professional Services Medical and Dental Services Offices Restaurants Hotels Drive-ln/Through Facilities” Convenience Stores*

*With conditions

f. Industrial Districts: For the purpose of consistency with the provisions of this Plan, no specific use schedule will be delineated. In general, industrial, manufacturing, transportation, commercial offices, and wholesaling operations would be included. Industrial and office parks would be considered as controlled elements of such districts. “Light” and “heavy” industry also can be considered as variations on this theme. In these zones, the County would regard retail, food and drink places, and residential uses as non-compatible.

Subdivision Regulations: Unllke zoning, subdivision regulations tend to be more homogeneous in Pennsylvania. Most municipalities in the Twin Rivers Area have such ordinances. The typical subdivision ordinance includes the following provisions:

8 AdmhstratiodEnforcement 8 Definitions 8 Plan Standards 8 ImprovementsBonding 8 Block and Lots 8 Mobile Home Park Standards 8 Land Development Standards


. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. .- . . - . .

Subdivision Design Standards:

Roads: Local roads should have a %)-foot right-of-way. Urban roads should be curbed; while rural roads should use berms and swales. Cartways fiom 20 (ruralhuburban) to 36 feet (urban) would be acceptable, consistent with storm drainage concerns. Detailed design criteria includes sight distance, curves, intersections, spacing, etc.

I I

Typical Cross Section Residential Street

Sewage and Water: Standards for on-lot and sewage collection and treatment systems should be consistent with requirements of Allegheny County and/or the Department of Environmental Protection standards.

Storm Drainaae: These standards should be consistent with any Stomwater Management Plan. See also Appendix 4 of the Allegheny County Ordinance.

Mobile Home Parks: It is time for the TRCOG Area to refashion the traditional mobile home park standards (Le. park on a five-acre parcel with 5,000 square feet per lot) to recognize the contemporary market. In today's real estate market, these manufactured homes play many roles. For some, they represent affordable, entry-level homes. For others, they are the summer residence of the Florida "snow birds." The price of these units also vary dramatically; in short, mobile homes are no longer the small, cramped, cheap housing of the post-World War I1 "trailer court." Contemporary units are large, well appointed, and have more traditional rooflines. As such, standards for mobile home communities must be updated. There are three areas to revise:

- Overall park size

- Overall lot size


-:j I

-. .. . .. ' -, . . :j

I d

zi

y -.

. .

- Design criteria to ensure a high-quality envkonment. This would include paved interior streets, rooflines, landscaping, and appropriate lighting.

Land DeveloDment Standards: These should vary between urban and rural needs. The purpose of land development standards is to examine development on a single parcel. Most communities can use this approach to examine large commercial and industrial developments, although multi- family residential can be included. These regulations typically look at the building footprint, parking, internal circulation, traffic impact, road access, lighting, and landscaping.

The Future Land Use Plan: The TRCOG Future Land Use Plan is presented on the following page. It divides the 14 municipalities into eight land use areas as follows:

Agricultural: These are places where farming is an ongoing activity. Some f m s are already in the Agricultural Security Area program, a clear indication of the importance attached to such uses. Agricultural Security Areas are designed to foster farming and limit other uses.

Commercial: envisioned:

There are three primary types of commercial land use

. Large commercial centers. These uses include such facilities as Century 111, Target, and the Olympia Shopping Center.

. Traditional downtown and neighborhood center retail.

rn Office and service businesses.

Industrial: This category includes light and heavy industry as well as warehousing and truck terminals. Certain riverfkont areas are designated as industrial.

Parks and Open Spaces: recreation, and permanently by non-agricultural reserved areas.

Reserved for parks, permanent outdoor

Residential - Medium to High Density: This category includes urban single-family uses on smaller lots to multi-family developments.

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Pian Page 41 . ..

i

i I . ,

I

i

Residential - Subdivision/Low Density: This category is designed for single-family development on larger lots.

Special River Areas: Essentially undeveloped riverfiont areas on the Monongahela and You&ogheny, which can be preserved for low-density residential, conservation, recreation areas, and targeted river uses such as mamas.

Low-Density: These are areas that have either physical limitations or are in areas where development is not practical.

Based upon the P W C the following, land designation shall be interpreted as follows:

Rural Resource Areas: Agriculture and Low Density

Designated Growth Area, Future Growth Area: Commercial, Industrial, Residential, and Medium- to High-Density

Other Land Uses: All other land uses are as stated.

The Future Land Use Plan follows the following philosophy:

9 Generally, the most intense development is located in the northern part of the Study Area. West Mifflin, McKeesport, Whrte Oak, Port Vue, and Liberty are the focal point of urban residential development (medium to high density) and the primary industrial and commercial locations. The only exception is Elizabeth Borough.

Because of their physical separation from other communities, West Mifflin and Madison are treated individually.

Generally, south of the “Boston Bridge,” recommendations are for lower-density uses, except around areas of more existing developments.

Agricultural areas are identified for Elizabeth and Forward Townships.


8 Riverside areas are identified with an eye to preserve these unique locations fiom inappropriate development.

Other Land Use Tools: Not all tools that promote sound land use and good community development practices can be conveniently inserted in a zoning ordinance or subdivision and land development ordinance. These concepts are presented in this Plan element:

I

8 Farmland Preservation: The preservation of viable fanns is a policy that has both individual and community benefits. There are three areas where such a program is especially appropriate (Forward and Elizabeth Townships and Lincoln Borough); in fact, it is quite active in Forward. By the end of 2003, some five farms in Forward Township with nearly 1,000 acres will be enrolled in the PACE program. Generally, the first step is to create Agricultural Security Areas-a step initiated by farm owners and then formalized by the local, county, then state governments. Agricultural Security Areas, however, offer limited protection. The PACE program, possible only in Agricultural Security Areas, can truly preserve fann areas by purchasing development right. In the previously mentioned municipalities, the pressure of suburbanization could easily destroy the rural environment unless the Agricultural Security and PACE programs are utilized, and used soon. The Extension Service and Conservation District can be used to promote this option.

Acauisition of Sensitive Land: The Allegheny Land Trust (ALT) has already acquired some land in the TRCOG Region (Dead Man’s Hollow, slope areas in White Oak, 200 acres of steep river slopes in Forward Township, etc.), and it represents a potential resource to acquire other steep slope areas to preserve them. There are various areas adjoining the Twin Rivers, which should be in public control to avoid inappropriate development. Certain stretches along the river- Bunola Road are a perfect example. This option will require a TRCOG committee to be formed, develop a list of candidate sites, and discuss this option with the ALT.

m Tree Preservation and Plantinq: This often is more of an issue in urban places than in rural communities. Boroughs or cities interested in tree preservation can appoint a Shade Tree Commission. Typically, this ordinance also contains rudimentary controls on tree removal,

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Pian Page 43

TRANSPORTATION PLAN

ravel through and in the Twin Rivers Area is difficult. Perhaps, ths statement is somewhat stark, but it is a key concept for th~s part of the Comprehensive Plan. Although thrs section contains specific .,-. *.rl...+.l .."k..* - , < , * 6

0 \., , - > . . ... I I. .

T recommendations for local roads, and policies to :y;z;:;;g;;y;;;;,y improve internal transportation needs, the r 0 1 overarching strategy must be to improve access to and through the Area.

The primary solution to this problem is the ModFayette Expressway. This project has been handed to the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and is scheduled for construction as a toll road. Essentially, the current plans call for construction fiom the current terminus of the road at Route 51, near Clariton, through West Mifflin, Dravosburg, and Duquesne, crossing the "Mon," and then passing through East Pittsburgh, Turtle Creek, and Wilkensburg, to its connection to 1-376 in Monroeville. A branch of the Expressway would also follow the Mon to the Parkway East in Pittsburgh. Consequently, this road provides good access for the area to Pittsburgh, Monroeville, the Parkway, and points south. Thts road project has two important function for the TR Area. First, it provides the most populated areas with a good access point to the Interstate system-a link now laclung. Second, it provides an excellent through road to vehicles that are "passing through" the area. It must be noted an alternative has been proposed. (See The Citizens Plan of the Citizen for Pennsylvania's Future.) However, the Twin Rivers COG is in full support of the ModFayette Expressway approach and should be its consistent top priority until constructed.

Improved connections to the west for an 1-79 link are part of the Turnpike's Southern Beltway projects.

I Though these projects should be top priority for the TRCOG Plan, not all elements of the Citizens Plan should be rejected, as it may provide improved local traffic flow. Ths Plan, while not fulfilling the goals of the Expressway, does propose some improvements that would enhance travel and accessibility within the Region.


Further study of the “urban boulevard” concept for some hghways proposed is advisable.

The transportation planning process is now governed by the provision of “TEA2 1 ,” the Transportation Equity Act of the 21‘‘ Century. That process involves a Long- Range Transportation Plan and the “TII?” (Transportation Improvement Plan). PennDOT has integrated the TEA21 process with its 12-Year Plan.

The TIP (Five-Year Action Plan) represents the current action plan by PennDOT. Listed projects which impact the Twin Rivers are as follows:

1. Mon Valley Expressway, Turnpike Commission - first priority for the TRCOG

2. Lincoln Way Widening - 2003 to 2006*, Pre-engineering and Final Design - $850,000

.3. McKeesportDuquesne Bridge Access - 2003 to 2006*, Design Right-of- Way Acquisition, Construction - $2,008,273

4. ACPA Mountain Blke Safety Education Program Allegheny Trail Alliance Line-Item - There are three trail projects listed; two in McKeesport and one in Port Vue. Total Cost $881,401

5 . Streets Run Road Bridge

6.

7.

Tnunball Runway Underpass - 2003” (nearly complete), $1,800,000

McClintock Road at Route 48 - 2003*, Final Design, $100,000

*Year of project initiation.

The projects are shown on the plate, Transportation Features, which follows.

Special Traffic Studies: In addition to the programmed projects listed above, there are special transportation study needs that must be addressed in the TRCOG Area. These should be pursued over a five-year period. These include:

1. Traffic Study - Route 885 and Lebanon Church Road: These two roads are among the busiest in the Study Area and deserve attention to


2.

3.

4.

5.

alleviate travel congestion and promote sound development practices. If possible, even private roads in key developments (Century I11 Mall, Wal- Mart) should be included in such planning.

Route 51 from Elizabeth to the Alleahenv. Westmoreland County Border: This study should have two elements. First, the improvement of the interchange at Elizabeth Borough must be considered. The second phase is to determine the land use/development impact the Mon Valley Expressway will have on land adjacent to Route 5 1.

Route 48 - A CaDacitv and Study of Road Geometry from the Boston Bridcre to Route 51: This study should contain recommendations for alleviating current hilVcurve/intersection problems on this highway.

The Port Vue, Libertv. Lincoln Borouahs Hiahway and Access Study: Recommendations to better link these communities and provide better access from Port Vue to nearby major transportation facilities.

Route 148 (Walnut Street) and Route 48: Right-of-way, capacity, and intersection studies fiom Lysle Boulevard to the Boston Bridge.

There are other transportation concerns beyond follow.

roads and highway, and these

Mass Transit

The Port Authority of Allegheny County is studying the extension and improvement of services to the Region. Unfortunately, thls comes at a time when mass transit funding has experienced extensive cuts, cuts that will lrkely lead to less, not more, in transit service. The support of this transit study by all of the municipalities will enhance the opportunity to receive the improved services. This support should include communications with the State representatives supporting the funding of the Plan. The recent transit funding cutbacks make such General Assembly support vital. During public meetings in the planning process, persons in the McKeesport area, particularly, expressed special concerns for retaining and improving transit service. The elderly and many worlung in Pittsburgh rely upon PAT for their transportation needs.


i

1

The Area generally lacks signs for directing traffic to the community centers, community facilities, and other sites. For instance, when traveling south from Glassport to Elizabeth, there is not one sign directing dnvers to Port Vue Borough

Directional signs to the municipal buildings are of special importance, but signs for recreation facilities, fire halls, and tourist sites are also needed.

I

1 (northbound, one sign was found partially covered by vegetation).

i

A signage plan should be developed to provide standardization of signs and a system that can be implemented as funds become available. The marketing people view signage as “branding.” And, certamly, some visual images do evoke names. The McDonald’s arch is the most famous “brand.” If the Twin Rivers Area is look for an identifl, it, too, needs a logo to fit into local signage.

- 1 -1 - 1

Additional Recommended Hiclhwav lmwovements

.‘ The following specific transportation improvements are recommended. Some are highway projects; others require local action. The implementation of some road

-. projects may require that they be placed on the Transportation Improvement Plan. a** Consequently, though an important priority, this list may take up to ten years to

complete.

I City of McKeesport:

-9 “I

::

-:I

Overall: General relief of traffic congestion.

- i I S.R. 148 - Hartman Street to Lincoln Wav: This area is a major gateway to the 2 2

J City of McKeesport. S.R. 148 is three lanes above this section and four lanes -si below. The buildings abut the sidewalks and are in need of refurbishment. The

roadway should be widened, turn lanes provided, or other improvements made to enhance the Area (see also Traffic Studies).

S.R. 148 - Walnut Street: There has been significant work to improve the corridor, including sidewalks, a park, a bike trail, and building demolition. This effort should be continued, but priority should be given to the maintenance of the previous improvements. Weeds have grown up along the sidewalks at the vacant lots and the fences are deteriorated. Debris and broken walls present an unsightly appearance to the area. In the ark, the weeds have grown up among the landscape plantings, especially at the 15 Street Bridge. Also, there has been a proposal to

- 1 - z

I

2


trade Walnut Street for Market Street as a lmking road to the 15h Street Bridge (see also Traffic Studies).

Lvsle Boulevard - Youg hioahenv River to Mansfield Bridae: Intersection improvements, along with the refhrbishment of the building facades would greatly enhance this entrance to the City.

White Oak Borough:

Brvn Mawr Road Rehabilitation: The Borough has identified this project to the County as a needed improvement for future consideration under the CDBG grant program. A storm drain project is included with the road improvement.

McClintock Bridae Widening: The proposed bridge widening is necessary to eliminate a hazardous condition due to the narrowing of the roadway at the bridge (see TIP listing).

Forward Township:

Bunola River Road: This roadway should be widened and realigned in some areas from the Monongahela Bridge to Elizabeth Borough. Trucks carrying hazardous materials use the road. Due to the physical constraints along this road any project will have to be phased. Some improvements might be accomplished through annual maintenance funds.

BikeNValkina Trail - Route 136 and River Road: Construction of a trail or bike route in conjunction with the proposed widening of River Road and continuing along S.R. 136 would enhance the recreational uses of the area. Bicycles are often seen along this roadway. There are already several parks and boat launches along this road.

Elizabeth Borough:

Route 51 Interchanae: This interchange has substandard acceleratioddeceleration lanes and hazardous curves. In addition the entrances from Elizabeth are poorly signed (see also Traffic Studies).

Parkina and Traffic Conaestion: Traffic through the Borough is slowed due to the narrow streets and parking that is permitted on both sides of the street. If parking could be removed from one side, it would improve traffic flow and the


appearance of the business district. Yet, that alternative must be balanced with the need of downtown businesses. One alternative would be to provide a bypass route, if feasible. That would remove a great deal of the truck traffic from the commercial area.

River Road Entrance: The River Road entrance to the Borough is congested and unattractive. Directional signing is inadequate and the turn is restrictive.

Elizabeth Township:

State Route 48: A study of the intersections and dangerous curves on this route that slow traffic flow. his is the only central traffic route in thls part ofthe region and is heavily used by trucks (see also Traffic Studies).

Weiales Hill Road Reconstruction: A three-phase project is proposed to reconstruct this important school bus route. The roadway and shoulders are deteriorated and hazardous to bus traffic.

Route 48 and Lovedale Road Intersection: Improve the Route 48 and Lovedale Road intersection.

Glassport Borough:

Entrance at Mansfield Bridae: This entrance to the Borough is actually located in McKeesport. Traffic enters the Borough from the Mansfield Bridge or from McKeesport Boulevard, passing under the bridge. The roadway under the bridge passes a scrap yard, which is “screened” by a fence. The bridge needs to be painted and the area is unattractive. The entrance does not convey the nature of the community. The cooperation of the City and County would be necessary to provide better screening, plantings, and signs.

Entrance from River Road: The roadway should be reconstructed and repaved. Other enhancements such as signage and plantings would improve the entrance.

Extend Bike Trail: The Steel Valley trail ends near the Borough’s boundary. The trail should be extended along the river to Elizabeth and beyond through Forward Townshp. Ths would require the cooperation of the trails organization, the communities, and PennDOT.

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan Page 50 .!

1

Harrison Road Reconstruction: This proposed reconstruction is necessq to the deterioration of the road structure. The project would greatly enhance residential neighborhood.

Euclid Avenue Reconstruction: This proposed reconstruction is necessary to the deterioration of the road structure. The project would greatly enhance residential neighborhood.

Port Vue Borough:

due this

due this

Entrances at McKeesDort Boulevard: There are two intersections at McKeesport Boulevard that provide entrances to the Borough. These are located in McKeesport. The alignments of the intersections and the turning radii should be improved. A sign indicating the direction to the Borough should be installed.

Entrance from 15'h Street Bridae: Traveling fiom the 15* Street Bridge, the roadway narrows and there is a severe right turn to the Borough. Accessibility during adverse weather would be a concern to prospective residents. The improvement of the road alignment and intersection would enhance this entrance (see also Traffic Studies), as would signage.

Li be* Way Reconstruction: Would enhance accessibility to a residential area and accessibility to the South Allegheny School fiom Glassport and Liberty Boroughs.

Parkina at MuniciDal Building: The commercial development, recreational facilities, and school around the municipal building generate a significant amount of traffic. The development of additional parking would enhance the area and could be used as a scenic overlook.

Liberty Borough:

Entrance from Street Bridae: Currently, traffic is directed to a narrow street that is in poor condition and is lined with deteriorated housing. This street is in Port Vue Borough and intersects Glenn Avenue near the Lincoln Borough boundary. Traffic should be directed to turn left onto the ramp at the north end of the bridge, to hver Road and then to a right turn onto Glenn Avenue. Glenn Avenue should be improved with new curbs and pavement. This project should be combined with a stream channelization project, which is needed along Glenn


Avenue to reduce flooding (see also Traffic Studies). Once more, signage is a must.

South Versailles Township:

Second Street Reconstruction: This is a proposed reconstruction of the residential street along railroad tracks. The project should include drainage and paving improvements.

Tourman Street Reconstruction: This project would provide for the installation of roadway underdrain and repaving of the roadway.

West Newton Borough:

Second Street: Extend the curb, sidewalk, and roadway improvements along this street, throughout the residential area.

Simaae: Provide additional signs to the Borough offices and other community facilities.

Route 136 Bridae over the Youahioaheny River at West Newton: Improve pedestrian and bdce crossing; provide signage to the business area for trail users.

Madison Borough:

Herminie Madison Road: Improve width, shoulders, geometry; repave

The continued operation of the Allegheny County w o r t is important to the TRCOG Area. Where possible, this facility should be tied to area economic development activities (see prior reference in the Economic Development Plan).

- Rail

M e r years of decline, rail traffic in the United States has stabilized and, in some instances, rebounded. Typically, rail service is important for heavy manufacturing. As a policy, the TRCOG will support a vital railroad service in the Region. However, it will insist on adequate rail crossings in all communities for public safety.


.' I

i

SANITARY SEWAGE

. !

ne of the greatest problems facing the municipalities in the Area is the 0 regulation of stormwater flows under the EPA Phase I1 mandates, both itom separate systems and the combined sewers in McKeesport, Glassport, and Elizabeth. These systems also have combined system overflows. The scope of the problem is not yet fully detennined, and the DEP and EPA will regulate the schedule for improvements. Therefore, final recommendations related to the problem cannot be made at this time.

Yet, an understanding of that problem is necessary in both short- and long-term sewer plans. They have been capsulated by John Schombert of the Three Rivers Wet Weather Demonstration Program and are included here:

1. Combined Sewer Overflow Policy: All sewage treatment plants that serve combined sewer systems are required to develop long-term wet-weather control plans in order to manage combined sewer overflows. All of these systems should already have "DES permits that require them to implement a series of best management practices called 9 Minimum Controls. These have already been in effect for more than five years, but municipalities have varying degrees of implementation. The next round of NPDES permits, and probably administrative orders from DEP will require the continued development and implementation of the 9 MCs but will require the development of substantial system lnformation including system mapping, hydraulic characterization, system optimization (using the large combined pipe system as storage in small rains as an example). These are all prerequisites to the requirement for the development of system long-tern wet weather control plans. These are generally 10-to-15-year plans for reducing CSOs fiom 40 to 50 events per year, down to about four or five. All but significant storms will be required to be treated, either through plant expansion, storage, or satellite treatment at the CSO. Historically, these plans can cost upwards of one to three thousand dollars per household over the next 10 to 15 years.

2. CMOM (Caoacitv, Manaqernent Ooeration, and Maintenance Rule): Also known as the SSO rule for separate sanitary systems. This rule has been pending Erom the end of the Clinton administration. It is probably coming out in the next year. For the first time, communities that own and operate sanitaq sewer systems will be required to develop sanitary overflow


spill plans, operation and maintenance plans, and financial capability plans (based on GASB 34 asset management accounting rules). This also requires NPDES permits for sanitary systems for the first time. Sewer systems in each watershed will have the option of individual permits or a joint watershed single permit. This also will rewire that all systems have updated inter-municipal agreements. Under this rule, all SSOs are illegal and communities must self-report. The only defense allowed in rule is for catastrophic events such as hurricanes, etc. This means sigmficant operational improvements and rehabilitation. The financial impact of this is unknown, but it substantially changes how communities have operated their systems ffom the past practices.

3. Of less financial impact is a recent requirement from DEP that all sewage collections systems, with pump stations, that are owned separately fi-om the sewage treatment plant must provide certified operators. DEP is offering a grandfather cycle to existing public works staff between now and February (2003). This grandfather license is for that system only, and the operator must continue to get annual continuing education credits. The financial impact here is minimal, but it shows the future emphasis on system operation and maintenance.

The sewer problems of the TRCOG municipalities in both Counties must be viewed as long-term issues, impacting all residents-currently, or in the next decade. An alliance of systems is critical to deal with such issues, especially with DEPEPA.

Recommended Improvements:

Sanitary sewer systems to collect and dispose of liquid waste are a primary need of local governments. This Plan addresses construction of sanitary collection lines as well as sewage treatment plant improvements. Public infrastructure improvements are crucial to increase economic growth in the Region. Communities share a regional interdependency through the collection and sharing of sewage treatment plant facilities. Inter-municipal sewage agreements exist between Elizabeth Township and Lincoln Borough; Elizabeth Borough and ElizabethEoward Townships; and McKeesport and Liberty/Lincoln/Port Vue, Whlte OaWVersailles Boroughs.

The project areas are plagued with malbctioning septic systems or have on lot size limitations for an acceptable system. These malhctioning systems discharge


sewage into ground water, wells used as a water source, streams, and rivers. Uncontrolled stormwater runoff has increasingly become an economic burden and serious threat to the health and well being of residents. Surface and ground water in sanitary collection systems add to the cost of sewage treatment at the plants. During significant periods of rainfall, some of the flow is discharged, untreated, into rivers and streams.

In Allegheny County, the TRCOG acts as a conduit between County, State, and Federal sources, and local municipalities, as a consequence, have identified many short-term needs, to be completed in the next five years. Scopes of work will consist of the following and the cost of construction of each is included on Table CF- 1

Sewage Plant PiDina ImDrovements, Elizabeth Borouclh: This project proposes to add inter-unit piping at the sewage treatment plant so that the plant can handle large flows, which occur during wet weather. The project will reduce the impact of a problem that occurs in prolonged wet weather. The work will consist of installation of approximately 50 feet of 16 inches hameter ductile iron piping above the settling tanks, 70 feet of 12 inches outlet pipes fiom the discharge side of the final settling tanks and connecting them to the existing lines between the settling tanks and chlorine contact tanks, 350 feet of 16 inches diameter ductile iron pipe fiom downstream effluent flume to last manhole on existing outfall to the Monongahela River. This project will comply with one of the requirements of EPA’s regulations on combined sewer overflows that require plant owners to maximize the flow through the plant rather than allow untreated discharge through overflows.

Washinaton Boulevard Sanitarv Sewer Extension, Liberty Borouclh: The project will service four existing homes currently without sanitary sewers. The project will consist of the installation of approximately 1,123 lineal feet of sanitary pipe, five manholes, wye connections, appurtenant items of construction and restoration. Currently, these four existing homes are in violation of the Clean Streams Act as their malfunctioning septic systems are discharging raw sewage to roadway ditches. Thls sewer extension would tie these homes into the existing collection and treatment system and open new areas for development.

Patterson Hill Area Sewers, Lincoln Borouah: Consists of extending sewers to 42 households. The project consists of installation of approximately 4,000 lineal feet of 8” sanitary sewer, 26 manholes, 600 LF of lateral pipe, 16 grinder pumps, 500 lineal feet of 1.5” PVC pipe, 700 lineal feet of 3” PVC pipe, wye connections,

Twin Rivers Comprehensive PIan Page 55

! ‘ i

I

7-1 . . .I

i

.,.- :. . -. . 7,: .:, ~. . .. . - .I

-:I

i

and other ancillary items such as select backfill, pavement and other restoration, and reimbursement of tap-in fees. The new sewer lines will connect to an existing sewer on Mable Drive, which flows to Elizabeth Township; sewage is then pumped to Elizabeth Borough’s sewage treatment plant. The Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD), who determined that the existing on-lot sewage disposal systems show malfunctions and are considered a danger to public health, surveyed this area. The ACHD, therefore, ordered the Borough to submit a plan to eliminate malfunctions. This project will comply with that order.

Juniata Avenue Sanitaw Sewer Extension, GlassDort Borough: T ~ I S project will service five existing homes currently without sanitary sewers and will consist of the installation of 1,500 lineal feet of 8’’ sanitary sewer, eight manholes, wye connections, lateral pipe, road and other restoration, and reimbursement of tap-in fees. These five homes are currently served by on-lot septic systems of which many are 30 to 40 years old and in need of repair and possibly malfunctioning.

Naomi Avenue Sanitaw Sewer Extension, GlassDort Borouah: This project will service five existing homes currently without sanitary sewers. The project will consist of the installation of approximately 1,500 lineal feet of 8” sanitary sewer, 14 manholes, wye connections, lateral pipe, road and other restoration and reimbursement of tap-in fees. These five homes are currently served by on-lot septic systems of which many are 30 to 40 years old and in need of repair and are possibly malfunctioning.

Sewaae Treatment Plant UV Disinfection System, GlassPort Borouah: The project will consist of the installation of a UV disinfection system complete including all appurtenant items and electrical work. The UV disinfection system is a non-chemical method of-disinfection and will replace the chlorine disinfection system currently being used at the sewage treatment plant. It is anticipated that this will reduce operating cost and be more environmentally friendly.

i

Mohawk Drive Sanitaw Sewer Rehab/Relinina. Elizabeth Township: The project consists of the relining of approximately 2,800 feet of 8,’ sanitary sewers within the Mohawk Drive area. Construction will also include connections to 40 existing laterals, three manholes, cleaning and televising to prepare for lining, appurtenant items of construction and restoration. The project will eliminate possible health hazards posed by deteriorating distribution system.

Belsar/Hiah Street Sanitaw Sewers, Elizabeth Township: This project consists of the installation of approximately 2,925 lineal feet of 8” sanitary sewer,


.. -1

i .i

___, . - .,I

. : I ;’ j

20 manholes, lateral services, erosion control, restoration to service 22 residential structures, and tap-in fees. The project will eliminate a severe health hazard in the project area associated with malfimctioning septic systems with open discharges to lawn surfaces and road gutters.

Lower Railroad Street Sanitarv Sewer Extension, South Versailles Township: The project will extend sanitary sewer service to six residences. The project consists of installation of approximately 36,OO lineal feet of force main sewer, six grinder pumps, tap-in fees, and other items of construction. The project will connect the homes on the Youghlogheny River side of the railroad tracks to the sanitary sewer treatment plant. These homes are among the last homes in the lower section of the Township that do not have sanitan, sewers.

Libertv Wav SeDaration of Combined Sewers Phase 3, Port Vue Borouclh: The proposed project consists of the separation of combined sanitary/stonnwater sewer into separate stand along systems. The project will involve the installation of new storm sewer and some collection mlets to remove storm water from existing sewer. The project will consist of construction of approximately 2,020 lineal feet of 15” stom sewer piping, 10 stormwater collection mlets, 330 lineal feet of 8” PVC sanitary sewer piping, five manholes access and alignment structures, rerouting of existing stonn lines, abandonment of existing sewer facilities, all required connections, all restoration activities, and appurtenant items of construction.

Gallatin Sewacle Treatment Plant and Collection Svstem. Forward Townshio: This project will construct a 40,000 GPD wastewater treatment plant complete to service approximately 104 existing homes currently without sanitary sewers. Also included is construction of prefabricated control building complete, back-up generator, 11,655 lineal feet of 8’’ PVC gravity sewer, 339 lineal feet of 6” PVC gravity sewer, 104 service y e s , two submersible pump station and valve vaults, 3,018 LF 4” PVC force main, 310 LF bored 16” steel casing pipe, test cores, 60 manholes with flames and covers, cleanouts, air/vac relief manhole, 61 inflow protectors, six culvert/stream crossings, 8,000 CY stone backfill 1 1 1 trench, asphalt pavement replacement, shoulder restoration, dnveway restoration, vacuum testing of manholes, 12,304 lineal feet of closed circuit TV sewer inspection, air testing gravity sewers, pressure test force main sewers, seeding, erosion and sedimentation controls, and all required restoration. The Gallatin-Sunnyside area along the Monongahela River in Forward Township has long been a problem area with malfunctioning on-lot sewage disposal systems and direct sewage discharges resulting in point source sewage pollution of the river. There are no existing


wastewater treatment plants close enough to allow for conveyance of sewage from this area. The PADEP, AHD, and the SPC are aware of this situation and have been involved in the planning process to bring a resolution to this problem.

McKeesDort Interceotor: Ths is a significant project with an estimated cost of $6.7 million. Generally, this project entails the deactivations of the Buena Vista sewer treatment plant (Elizabeth Township) and transporting waste via new interceptors along the Youhogheny hver Trail using the Buena Vista and Boston pump stations. The waste would be transported to the proposed MACM pump station for treatment at the McKeesport plant. Though designed for Elizabeth Township, this system could also serve Forward Township, Lincoln, Liberty, and Port Vue Boroughs.

Lovedale Sewer Construction, Elizabeth Township: This project proposes to divert flows fiom the existing Lovedale pump station fiom the Buena Vista watershed to the Elizabeth Borough watershed and then to Wylie pump station and eventually to Elizabeth Borough for treatment. The project will consist of construction of approximately 12,000 feet of lo” diameter sewer, 48 manholes, 30 new service connections, 450 feet of 6” service laterals, and pump station upgrade of pumps for additional flows. Associated items of construction include traffic control, soil erosion and sedimentation control, road crossings, where needed, and restoration of all disturbed areas including pavement replacement. The project will reduce flows at the Buena Vista plant by about 70,000 GPD and thus provide capacity for growth in that watershed. The Elizabeth Borough plant has adequate capacity to handle the additional flow. The project will also help to provide sewer service to the Mill Hill Road area of Elizabeth Township and allow for future service to the adjoining community of Lincoln Borough, as well as eliminate health hazards fiom malfbctioning systems along Lovedale Hollow.

Dravosburq Acquisition Feasibilitv Studv. West Mifflin Borouah: The Borough Council of Dravosburg Borough and the Board of Directors of West Mifflin Sanitary Sewer Municipal Authority (WMSSMA) have had preliminary discussions concerning the future of the treatment plant and sewer system owned and operated by the Borough of Dravosburg. The Dravosburg sewer system consists of about five miles of sanitary sewer (combined and separate) and a 0.48 MGD wastewater treatment facility along the Monongahela River. The Borough of Dravosburg has 2,015 residents (2000) who currently bear the expense of operating and maintaining the sanitary sewer infkastructure and treatment plant. There are 658 sewer customers of the Dravosburg sewer system. The WMSSMA is an operating authority with about 8,500 customers serving West Mifhn


Borough (2000 population 22,464) and some adjacent municipalities. The purpose of this study is to determine if it is feasible to have WMSSMA accept and treat

i some, or all, of Dravosburg's effluent. This could lead to the eventual I abandonment of Dravosburg plant.

i

1 I Bettis Road Sanitaw Sewer, West Mifflin Borouqh: This project is designed to

eliminate deteriorated on-lot septic systems and eliminate a deteriorated sewage pump station. The project will provide sanitary sewer service to 21 residential properties that are presently being served by on-lot septic systems. The project is located in both West Mifflin Borough and Dravosburg Borough. The project will also remove approximately 286 customers or about 43% of the existing customer base (the entire northern portion of the Borough of Dravosburg) from the Dravosburg STP and it will flow by gravity and be treated at the Thompson Run

1

i 1 -4

-* *I I STP of the WMSSMA.

i - , 4

3 = I

.> :.: ' ! I

. -8

I

... .. . I

New Enqland Sewage Treatment Plant US Disinfection Svstem. West Mifflin Borouah: The New England WTP uses chlorine gas to disinfect the wastewater prior to its entering the receiving system. Although over the near 50 years of operation of the New England WTP using chlorine gas, there has never been an incident that caused a release. There have been improvements in treatment technology so that changing the technology this risk can be totally eliminated.

Thompson Run Road Sewage Treatment Plant UV Disinfection Svstem, West Mifflin Borouah: The Thompson Run WTP uses chlorine gas to disinfect the wastewater prior to its entering the receiving system. Although over the near 50 years of operation of the Thompson Run WTP using chlorine gas, there has never been an incident that caused a release. There have been improvements in treatment technology so that by changing this technology, the risk can be totally eliminated.

Clairton Road Sewer Phase 2. West Mifflin Borough: The project is designed to provide sanitary serve to 12 residential properties that are presently being served by on-lot septic systems. This project is the second phase of a three-phase project to provide sanitary sewer service to the Clairton Road area.

Homeville Road Trunk Sanitaw Sewer Rehabilitation, West Mifflin Borough: The project is designed to rehabilitate 3,100 lineal feet of 15-inch sanitary sewer by the use of a cured in-place liner. The project begins at the Homeville PS (near the Munhall Borough border) and proceeds up to the valley to the vicinity of the Homeville No. 3 Fire Station just above the intersection with Duquesne Road. In


- 1 i I

-.-I .--3

' I

addition to the lining, about 300 feet of sewer will be rehabilitated by using conventional excavation techniques.

Mifflin Manor Sanitarv Sewer. West Mifflin Borourrh: The project is designed to provide sanitary sewer service to 90 residential trailers and two properties. A pump station that pumps the sanitary flows over the watershed boundary and into the Streets Run sewer shed is serving the trailers. The two residential properties are presently being served by on-lot septic systems.

St. Arrnes Lane Sanitarv Sewer, West Mifflin Borourrh: The project is designed to provide sanitary sewer service to six residential properties that are presently being served by on-lot septic systems.

Willock Road Sanitarv Sewer, West Mifflin Borouah: The project is designed to eliminate deteriorated on-lot septic systems. Ths project will provide sanitary sewer service to 11 residential properties that are presently being served by on-lot septic systems. Presently, all 11 systems are not in compliance with Allegheny County Heath Department regulations.


Table CF-1 Twin Rivers Council of Governments - Summary

There has been extensive work done on the preceding list of sanitary sewer needs for Allegheny County. Pmnarily, these are projects that have, or may be included, in annual requests of funding to Allegheny County. These additional needs involve some large undertakings. The following projects include Westmoreland County municipalities as well as additional needs of Allegheny County areas:


Madison Borough: Madison Borough is a small municipality that has public water but no sanitary sewer service. In 2000, the community had a “537” Sewage Facilities Plan prepared. This document recommended the Borough construct a pump station and collection system. Effluent would be transported to the nearby Dmagh system for treatment. The cost of this project was estimated at four to five million dollars. Madison is not “under orders” and considers this to be a long-term project.

West Newton Borough: The Borough related they are not under any type of DEP mandates. Those portions of the West Newton, east of the Yougluogheny, are a combined system, while, west of the river, the system is separated. Borough officials report they have a long-term program to cure inflow and infiltration problems.

Other needs for Allegheny County communities are as follows:

Forward Township:

Route 51 Corridor: Provide sanitary sewer service to Golden Age, Rustic Acres, 51 estates developments, and to the developments around the S.R. 51 and S.R. 48 intersection.

Elizabeth Manor: Rehabilitate or replace the existing sanitary sewers, including the separation of storm and sanitary sewage. This is a major project.

Other areas in Forward Township requiring attention are Axelton, Bunola, Pangburn, and the Sunset ViewPleasant View region.

Lincoln Borough:

Sanitarv Sewers: Construct sanitary sewers on Harrison Road, Liberty Way, Lovedale Road, Pierce Road, Fuerher Drive, and West Smithfield. These areas are currently unsewered and are experiencing a significant number of malhctioning on-lot systems.

West Mifflin Borough:

Delwar Road Sanitarv Sewer: Provides sewer service to one residence and six commercial developments on Delwar Road. Th~s extension would allow for expansion of this commercial area.


Special Drainage Project: For some time, the Borough of West Newton has been concerned about the Sch 11 Run flooding. Scholl Run is located east of the Youghiogheny River and traverses the southeast quadrant of the Borough. In 2000, DEP completed a Flood Protection Study. The Study Area begins near Route 136, passes near the West Newton Elementary School and community swimming pool, and then outfalls to the river. Two alternatives are presented by the study, with "C" being the DEP recommendation. Cost estimates (Year 2000) vary from $720,000 (Alternate C) to $1,200,000 (Alternate A).

Regardless of the option used, this is a critical project for West Newton.

7

1 I

1 i

!

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan 4 Page 63

1 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY

he public water supply systems, operated by the Pennsylvania-American Water Company and the Westmoreland County Water Authority have T adequate supplies for existing and proposed development. The extension of

the water systems is dependent upon utility policy. Normally, the developer is responsible for contacting the water authority and assuming the cost of installation and testing. The utilities have specific written policies for service expansions and costs vary with the pipe size of the meter connections and such additional appurtenances as fire hydrants.

Obviously, extensions will depend upon the cost effectiveness. Where a municipality desires to have the water systems extended, it is necessary to work with the water company to accomplish thls goal. If the proposal involves economic development, especially manufacturing, grants may be available.

One of the greatest needs for water service extension is in Forward Townshp and Elizabeth Townships. These are short-term five-year needs. The Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County serves the townships. Much of the community is not served by public water, and the water quality of the wells and springs is poor. Though not as pervasive, Lincoln also needs additional water service to approximately 14 homes.

However, caution should be exercised in areas that are designated for agricultural or environmental preservation. Providing public water or sanitary sewers creates pressure for development and can adversely impact preservation plans.

Most municipalities within the Study Area reported no problems with either flow or capacity for their public water service. However, there were complaints relative to water quality. Versailles Borough, especially, stated that the water supply by the Westmoreland County Water Authority is of poor quality, and they have made a formal complaint on same. '

,

Due to the national tragedy of 911 1 , water companies are hesitant to release service area data. Consequently, an existing and proposed water service area map is not available.

I It is the intent of this Plan to be consistent with the State Water Plan. Article 111, Section 301(b) of the PaMPC also requires the following statement:

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan !

Page 64

. .

(1) Lawfil activities such as extraction of minerals impact water supply sources and such activities are governed by statues regulating mineral extraction that speci& replacement and restoration of water supplies affected by such activities.

(2) Commercial agriculture production impact water supply sources.

I

_ I Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan Page 65 1

._. i

i i COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLAN -1

I

- 1 !

here is good health service, fire and emergency services, police protection, T library system, and parks in the Study Area. However, they face many of the problems seen in most of Pennsylvania.

Public Safety: The increasing cost of police protection strains the budgets of the communities. The reduction in the number of new volunteer firemen is impacting the ability of the departments to respond. The ability to raise fimds for maintaining and purchasing equipment and materials has been impacted.

Public safety services have long represented a major expense to local municipalities. In addition, many volunteer fire services have experienced a decline in membership. Neither of these problems is now at a crisis stage; in fact, some are not yet seen as a problem. Yet, if the TRCOG Area is similar to other parts of Pennsylvania, there will be increasing pressure to seek more cost and personnel-effective solutions.

At th~s point, the following actions are recommended. First, formally poll all TRCOG municipalities to determine the interest in a regional police service. If sufficient, positive responses are received, request a DCED grant to study the feasibility of such action. This action should start between years two and three of the Plan.

Subsequent steps will be determined by the survey results. If there is no immediate interest, repeat the poll in five years.

Second, poll communities relative to volunteer fire services and their current status. If some departments are having operational difficulties, then initiate a consolidation study(ies), as appropriate. This should occur in year two and three of the Plan.

I Parks and Recreation \

Recommended Improvements: The following are recommendations for improving community facilities in each of the municipalities. Some of these improvements have already been undertaken. All are regarded as short term, zero to five years.

1 I


Reqional Recreational Park System

The Twin Rivers COG Regional Area consists of 14 municipalities with an approximate inventory of 82 recreational related facilities along with eight municipalities that border the Yougluogheny Rwer Trail. Located in the Plan is a comprehensive inventory listing of each site by municipality. Facilities may consist of a variety of types with some being swimming pools to ball field complexes, to regional parks, to small localized playgrounds or tot-lots.

Each facility is being faced with similar problems of the times-well maintained, but older, equipment. Many buildings and facilities are also not compliant with updated safety and accessibility standards and requirements.

These circumstances, a lack of facilities and changing standards, clearly call for a detailed TRCOG regional park plan. This study should contain at least two elements:

8 Current recreational inventory, vis-a-vis current and projected population need, with special attention to the requirements of older citizens.

8 Current recreational facilities, vis-a-vis contemporary safety and accessibility standards.

* ;I 1

i I

This TRCOG Plan also proposes that a regional park system be established. This makes a great deal of sense from the planning financial basis. The overall maintenance of the facilities and the efficient use of the parks could be coordinated by a regional coordmator. And, the parks could be eligible for Regional Asset District Funds (Allegheny County).

Recreation benefits the community as well as the individual. A quality leisure service in a community greatly enhances the quality of life. A quality park and recreation service reflects upon the assets of a community. The decline and deterioration of these facilities reflect negatively on the quality of life of the Area.

1 -2 3

1 :,

, The Region strongly feels that the County and State need to address new ways to cooperate with municipalities to be able to offer recreation locally to attract residents and businesses and strengthen its economy. A surge of funds needs to be programmed to the Region over the next five to seven years, until the recreational facilities are brought up to grade and maintained until the economy is stabilized.

i


Twin Rivers Council of Governments could be the vehicle under an inter- municipal agreement or contract to manage the system and upgrade, maintain, renovate, and expand facilities to reach the goal of continued support in the delivery of recreation to the communities.

Short-Term Recreational Needs

Listed below are some detailed projects that communities have expressed interest in pursuing within the near future, or were identified by fieldwork:

Elizabeth Borough:

Wylie Park - Installation of new fencing around the ball field, playground, basketball court, and tennis courts - $40,000.

Elizabeth Towns h itx

Buena Vista Parmoat Launch - Installation of a boat launch with necessary parking and turn-around space - $25,000.

Howell Property - Development of a Master Site Plan to determine the future development of this approximate 90-acre area of wooden land - $20,000.

Round N11 County Park - Contains 1,100 acres and is not intensely used. It is recommended the County work cooperatively with Elizabeth Township to explore the potential of joint use facilities for field sports, especially soccer.

Forward Town sh i D:

Gallatin Sunnyside Rverfront Park - Development of a paved walking trail to encompass the entire park, which includes adapting the trail to allow more accessibility to areas within the park - $30,000. Installation of new play equipment with necessary safety surfacing, drainage, and accessibility - $50,000.

GlassDort Borouqh:

Thud Street Park - Development of a sitting park, which includes a gazebo, benches with necessary accessibility, shrubbery, and landscaping - $25,000.

Glassport Rwerfi-ont Park - Enhancing the area to include accessibility, picnic tables, grills, and trash receptacles - $10,000.


Swimming Pool - Installation of a new 450"-rotation slide with a seven-foot platform and a three-foot toddler slide. $1 0,000

Ninth Street Park - Demolition of current concession stand and construction of a new complete concession stand with necessary appurtenances - $72,000.

Libertv Borouah:

Liberty Park - Installation of new fencing with all appurtenances around the basketball and hockey courts - $10,000.

Manor Park - Installation of a pavilibn With necessary accessibility and all appurtenances - $15,000.

Manor Circle Sitting Park - Development of a sitting park that includes a gazebo, benches with necessary accessibility, shrubbery, and landscaping - $25,000.

Memory Lane Park- Installation of a pavilion with necessary accessibility and all appurtenances - $15,000.

Lincoln Borouclh:

Bell Bridge Park - Installation of a pavilion with necessary picnic tables and accessibility - $ 20,000; and the installation of new play equipment with necessary .safety surfacing, drainage, and accessibility - $35,000

Calhoun Road Pavilion and Park - Improve the facilities, including benches and playground equipment.

Port Vue Borou~h:

PVAA Recreation Complex - Installation of new play equipment with necessary safety surfacing, drainage, and accessibility - $50,000.

R o d e Avenue Park - Study and assess the needs and develop cost estimate to construct a large-scale recreation complex, which would include a multi-purpose recreation center, skate park area, open space, concession area, and comfort station.


1 Develop Scenic Overlook - A scenic overlook should be developed behind the municipal building including benches and hlstoric markers. This project should be part of the overall development of the community park.

Tot-Lots - Neighborhood tot-lots should be developed in the northeast and southeast comers of the Borough.

I

I i

Versailles BorouQh:

High Street Park - Resurfacing of the basketballhockey court. $10,000

.. .... '2 ..I

Versailles Riverfront Park (Open Space) - Completing phase two evaluation of hazardous materials located on site to proceed with remedial clean up of the area - $100,000. Once an area has been cleaned, pursue development f k d s as recommended by the Master Site Plan.

West Mifflin Borouah:

Bettis (West Mifflin) Community Park - Development of new picnic groves with construction of several pavilions, whch include electric service and all necessary appurtenances - $250,000.

Mon View Playground - Installation of new play equipment with necessary safety surfacing, and accessibility - $10,000.

. ji

Soccer Complex Lafarge (Future consideration) - Study and assess the needs and develop a cost estimate to construct a soccer field complex complete with game and practice fields, concession area, comfort station, and maintenance garage.

Recreation Complex and Community Center (Future consideration) - Study and assess the needs and develop cost estimate to construct a large-scale recreation complex which would include an outdoor swimming pool, playground, a multi- purpose community recreation center, deck hockey court, basketball courts,

I

$J

-, A

j

I -.A . (

I volleyball courts, concession area, comfort station, and maintenance garage. f

West Newton Borouah:

G o e h g Park - Remove unsafe playground equipment and replace with a new multi-play structure with necessary safety surfacing, drainage, and accessibility. $20,000.

I

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan i

Page 70

I

White Oak Borouah:

I

Heritage Hill Park - Study and assess the needs and develop a cost estimate to construct a skate park area within the park.

White Oak also desires to construct a true multi-featured community center. However, the specific needs have not yet been established, so costing is not possible. Unfortunately, due to the physical separation with West Mifflin, a joint facility study with that proposal is not feasible. For White Oak, there is a need for a preliminary assessment study. Specifically, such a study would look at needs, locations, and establish very preliminary costs.

Reqional Trainina ComDlex

Currently, the TRCOG regional training complex located in Elizabeth Township is used for a variety of public safety purposes. Training includes police, fire, EMS, and municipal personnel. Much of its use focuses on police weapons and driving training. However, additional use is possible.

t

The COG has received a proposal from the Elizabeth Township firefighters to assist in the development of fire training facilities at the regional training center. This facility could be used by all of the communities in the COG for the required yearly training.

Mu n ici pa I Bui Id i nqs

A need for new municipal buildings has been expressed for Lincoln Borough, Glassport Borough, and Forward Township.

,


HISTORIC RESOURCES PLAN

here are a variety of tools that can be used to afford individual properties or T districts historic protection. However, the degree and type of protection, if any is indeed desired, as well as timing, it is a matter of local policy. Generally, communities can take one or more of the following options:

The National Register: Encourage the formal listing of properties or districts on the National Register. This approach provides limited protection for the property fiom activities that are Federally funded. Either the property must be preserved or precise records and documentation prepared prior to demolition. In Pennsylvania, nominations to the National Register are made to the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission (PHMC), which operate under authority fiom the U.S. Department of the Interior.

There can be economic benefits to this listing. Owners of income-producing property who conduct restoration activities that meet the Secretary of the Interior's (U.S.) Standards for Historic Preservation could receive a significant 20% tax credit. For business owners, the tax credit, if pursued carefully, can result in significant profitability, as this is a credit, not a deduction. The difficulty tends to be in working with a design and construction team that understands the needed standards and completing the necessary paper work.

The Historic District Act: For communities that really value their historic resources, land use regulations can provide protection. One option is the creation of a historic district under the provision of the Pennsylvania Historic District Act of 1961. Not to be confbsed with a National Register Historic District, the State law is significantly more comprehensive. It is implemented through a municipal ordinance, which, in turn, must be certified by the PHMC. Upon passage of the ordinance, the local government is empowered to create a Historic Architectural Review Board (HARB). The composition of the HARB is defined by the law and must include an architect, code officer, and realtor. Subsequent to passing the ordinance and creating the HARB, all new construction, exterior renovations, and demolitions in the Historic District must be reviewed and approved, upon which they may be granted a certificate of appropriateness. The HARB approach is used in a number of Pennsylvania communities, including Franklin in Venango County and Hannony in Butler County. Its principal shortcoming has been a perception by property owners that the actions of the HARB can be arbitrary or unrealistic. The


i

di -1.

Lb\

i

lti t n ’

: t I

main advantage is that unlike a zoning hearing board or planning commission, the HARE3 contains experts in hstoric preservation.

Zoning and Codes: Communities have been empowered to create zoning districts for the purposes of “regulating, restricting, or prohibiting uses or structures at along or near places having unique historical, architectural, or patriotic interest or value” since 1968. However, with the passage of Act 67/68 in 2000, zoning now “shall provide for protection of natural and historic features and resour~es.~’ Yet, the Planning Code is silent on how this mandate might be accomplished.

Though the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code specifically grants this power, it has not been as commonly used in Pennsylvania, as has the Historic District Act. When used, the typical approach has been to create an Overlay Zoning District, which has historic preservation standards. Typically, the Overlay District can only be designated after documentation of the Area’s historic resources, much llke the filing for inclusion on the National Register. Where development is proposed in the Overlay District, a local historical commission or design committee can be created to act as an advisor. Tlus type of ordinance was adopted by the City of Erie.

There is also a hybrid approach. On occasion, a municipality will develop a hstoric district under Act 1961, then import the area and its review process (the HARB) into its zoning ordinance.

Another means of historic preservation is through the use of adaptive re-use codes. Adaptive re-use codes promote preservation by giving additional use options to owners of historic structures. For example, a historic building in an R-1 District might have the right to use the structure for a professional office, a use perhaps not allowed for new construction in that district. The approach specifically can deal with “white elephant buildings”-former mansions, churches, and schools, whch may not be market-usable under normal nonconforming use standards. The approach can also tie into the tax credit program by opening up more opportunities for income producing property to be rehabilitated. The first adaptive re-use code in Western Pennsylvania was adopted by the City of Meadville.

Yet, another new power is the article added to the Planning Code entitled Traditional Neighborhood Development, or a TND. TNDs are another means to encourage innovation in local planning elements of zoning and subdivision regulations can be combined. A significant difference between TND and other


A PLAN FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES

he Land Use Plan and its “Growing Greener” options will do much to preserve the rural environment of the undeveloped sections of the TRCOG T Area. And, it is important to keep that quality of life. However, additional

actions are important. Actions should include:

Acid Mine Drainaae: Many areas of the Twin Rivers COG have acid mine drainage. These should be plotted, listed, and prioritized by severity. Then a program of treatment initiated. This will require the cooperation of the County and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.

Tire Dump: A tire dump problem near Route 51 in Forward Township needs resolution. The issuance of a beneficial use permit resolving this issue is a must.

Hazardous Chemicals: Various manufacturing activities in the Area involve hazardous chemicals. These present problems for possible security issues as well as for accidents. Such sites need to be identified and transportation facilities to these areas evaluated for safety (example, Bunola- River Road).


i

CONCURRENT PLANS

oncurrent with the development of the Twin fivers Council of Governments C Comprehensive Plan was the preparation of a Hazard Mitigation Plan and a Security Assessment. The Hazard Mitigation Plan is attached as a part of this document.

Twin Rivers Comprehensive Plan ! Page 76

. _

TWIN RIVERS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN COMPONENT

azard mitigation planning can support and can be supported by comprehensive planning. Both planning processes can have similar goals H and objectives; for example, decreasing property damage fiom flooding is

a hazard mitigation goal but can also support the goal in the comprehensive plan of maintaining existing housing stock. Both plans can have policies or recommendations that reinforce each other and help the community to focus resources, such as high risk areas like floodplains identified in the hazard mitigation plan can be set aside in the comprehensive plan for open space or other suitable uses, a consideration to be found noteworthy.

= The risk assessment process has not affected any goals or recommendations of the comprehensive plan.

Before any future development or change in land use is approved, the hazard mitigation plan will be consulted and any constraints noted in the risk assessment will be accounted for.

. Hazard mitigation is one of the goals of the comprehensive plan.

= Some activities have already been in place that helps in mitigating losses fi-om hazard in some communities. Stomwater management and enforcement of building code are two prime examples.

The communities have considered alternative mitigation actions by hazard for use. The top twelve TRCOG hazard mitigation projects are a result of the community participation in the planning process of Allegheny County and are provided as part of this Comprehensive Plan for consideration for fbture fimding by Federal and State agencies as well as a reference guide for priorities.


8 8 8

Alternative Mitigation Actions by Hazard

1 Prevention

I b 1 u) c 0 .- +I

U J m

Alternative Mitigation 0 - [

.- JyE B g g

E

Actions u) 9)

m 0 3 1

C

t""" Earthquakes

. q+ . I 1 9 . I . I . I . . - q+- . . . . I . Tsunamis

I I

I Tornadoes I I . I ' I I. I. I I . I . I.

Property Protection Public Education and lwarenesa

u)

e!

2 z +I

r u)

0 c 0 m > 9)

.- c

iij

e! 7 u) 0 0 u) TI

- .- Alternative

Mitigation Actions 9)

m u) a, m

- c

- $

I Floods . . I Earthquakes . . 8 . . . .

m . . I Landslides . . . I Wildfires 1 . m

I

I ._ I


Alternative Mitigation Actions

Natural Resource Protection

t""'- Earthquakes

D

D I Wildfires m

lency S( rvices I Structural Projects

Alternative Mitigation Actions

Floods

Earthquakes

D

D . D

D

Tsunamis D

Tornadoes D

Coastal Storms

1 . I I I I I Landslides Wildfires

D

D 1 . 1 . I I I I


! . I

! i

I I I

Twin Rivers Council of Governments Comprehensive Plan Hazard Mitigation Plan

Top Twelve Projects Listinq for the Twin Rivers COG Reaional Area -1 4

- 1

I Flooding of the Youghiogheny River from the Boston Area to the

i Smithdale Area: Approximately 540 properties get flooded. Flood 4 control measures/dredging of river.

Based on results of the September 24, 2003 Community Participation Meeting:

1.

i

Elizabeth Townshirx - PROBLEM: FLOODING I

I

Mtigation Alternative: Prevent future development in prime areas; enforce uniform construction code on shoreline setback regulations. Provide engineering study of existing structures. Consider acquisitioddemolition and/or dredgmg of the river. Consider U. S. Army Corps of Engineers considerations.

2. Versailles Borouah: - PROBLEM: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

8

:< ir

1 Mine/Hazardous Material - Business District and Residential District. There is Methane gas migration throughout a portion of the business

I district. ,:

I MtiPation Alternative: Extensive venting is needed with a community-wide assessment survey and possible dnlling to relieve

2 gas pressure and draw to one location and convert and use as an 2 energy source. Hazard threat recognition with a plan of action of

emergency services. -- 2 . I

I

3. West Mifflin Borouah: - PROBLEM: LANDMUDSLIDES I

8 Glenny Lane ExtensiodWebster Avenue; Elwell RoadJoyce Drive.

I

I l

There are mudslides behmd residential properties - approximately 15 homes. .~

Wtipation Alternative: Need to re-work and re-compact material along with properly heeled in fill benching and subsurface drainage

i


1 , I

Page 80

i

! I

piping to reduce hazard in bothxeas listed. An alternative plan, if above recommendations are not feasible, would be the acquisition of 15 homes/demolished.

4. Port Vue Borough: - PROBLEM: LANDSLIDE

i

. Arlington Avenue - Residential area - Loss of utilities

CSX railroad facility below Arlington Avenue, which is a 200-foot slope; 10-foot section of street has failed in recent years. Monitoring is being done; weight limit posted. Failure continues into the cartway; loss of sanitary sewer, water, electric, and gas services. There is the potential for structural damage to nearby homes on Arlington Avenue (18 homes).

Mitigation Alternative: Acquisition of properties; soil survey of area- possible construction of a barrier wall.

5. Glassport Borouah: - PROBLEM: FLOODING

= Glassport sewage plant and areas along the Monongahela River

Critical Facility: In the near future, lock being removed at Elizabeth; businesses affected along river. Economic impact-residential properties can be impacted on Allegheny Avenue and Monongahela Avenue.

Mtigation Alternative: Construction of a barrier along plant; acquisition of residential structures; code enforcement strictly enforced for new construction. Consider US. Army Corps of Engineers considerations.

6. Elizabeth Borough - PROBLEM: FLOODING

= Fallen Timber Run Area - Located off of Glassport Elizabeth Road

Three businesses, one church, and approximately 10 residential buildings


i i

I i

, :

! . \

. ,

7.

Mitigation Alternative: Acquisition, and relocation of businesses and residential properties. Utilize strict code enforcement on building in flood prone areas for hture development.

White Oak Borouah - PROBLEM: LANDSLIDE, MrNE SUBSIDENCE AND WILDFIRE . OaksDearborn Area: Landslide area (Retirement village below)

Top of lull in slide area - Has small slide issues currently-bottom of hill Oaks Retirement Village - 100 residents. No access to emergency equipment behind the building.

Mitipation Alternative: Stabilization of the hillside; engineering study and possible construction of a barrier around the back of the building.

8. South Versailles TownshiD - PROBLEM: FLOODING

. Sewage Treatment Plant flooding of You&ogheny River

Sewage treatment plant can get flooded - lead to loss of sewer service as well as dispersal of untreated sewage into the river. Has flooded within the past ten years.

Mitigation Alternative: Flood control measures/dredging of river and construction of a barrier around the structure. Consider U.S. Army Corps of Engineers considerations.

9. Liberty Borouah - PROBLEM: FLOODING

9 River Road - Commercial area along the Youghlogheny hver

Industrial property is vulnerable to flooding, landslide and hazardous material - Economic impact - loss of jobs.

Mitigation Alternative: Flood control measures/dredging of river and code enforcement regulations for future development. Possible barrier could be constructed in prime areas. Consider U.S. Army Corps of Enpeers considerations.


i

. I

10. Foward Township - PROBLEM: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

. Univar, Inc. - Chemply Drive, Bunola -(Chemical Company) - utilizes State Route 136

Truck accidents - chemical spills or toxic gas release risks. Imperative that Elizabeth

Mtigation Alternative: Elkhorn Road (Bunola River Road) is widened to prevent accidents and State be mandated to enforce winter maintenance as a priority. Possible relocation of the chemical company.

11. Citv of McKeesport - PROBLEM: FLOODING

9 Flooding of Water Treatment Plant and Sewage Treatment Plant by the Monongahela and Youghrogheny Rivers. Critical facilities - both priority - flood control measures need to be taken.

Mitigation Alternative: Construction of barriers around structures or relocation. Consider U.S. Army Corps of Engineers considerations.

12. Lincoln Borouah - PROBLEM: ENVIORNMENTAL PROBLEM: HEALTH HAZARD

9 Raw Sewage Run-off on State & Local Roads (failure of on-lot Septic Systems)

Run off is health hazard and may cause accidents - road freezes in winter.

Mtigation Alternative: Construction of sanitary sewers and enforcement of regulations governing septic system upgrades.


TRCOO MuncprdBmndary

-I-- Railroad

lTRCOG TRANSPORTATION PLAN MAP Rwisiom I L

comprehensive planelibrary.pacounties.org/documents/allegheny_county/71; elizabeth...

Documents