computation vs biology - university of georgiacsbl.bmb.uga.edu/~xyn/computational...
TRANSCRIPT
Ying Xu, Ph.D. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and
Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia
Computation vs Biologythe past, now and future
What Computation Has Done for Biology
Genome sequencing technologies have and continue to profoundly change biology and related sciences
Enormous amount of information could be derived through genome analyses and even through visualizing genomes
“Shot-gun” sequencing has made it possible to have genomes sequenced in such efficient manner
The un-sung hero for making “shot-gun” sequencing useful is the computational techniques for genome assembly
similar can be said about the roles played by computational techniques in generation of other omic data
• omic: genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, …
What Computation Has Done for Biology
Computational techniques have enabled omic data generation and utilization!
Numerous bioinformatics tools have been developed to derive functional/structural/interactional information from omic data
What Computation Has Done for Biology
Gene finding, function prediction
Structure prediction, modeling
Molecular Interaction prediction
Biological network prediction, modeling
Cell-level modeling, simulation
Mechanical stress to cell signaling modeling
Modeling of ecosystems
A key role these computational techniques have played is to rapidly narrow down searches for needle in haystacks
What Computation Has Done for Biology
Computational analysis of Plasmodium falciparummetabolism
computational simulations have helped to identify 216 “chokepoints” in this pathway modelamong all 24 previously suggested drug targets, 21 target at the “chokepointsamong the three popular drugs for malaria, they all targeted at the “chokepoints”
Plasmodium causes human malaria
Modeling and simulation have inspired rapid generation of testable hypotheses
a good example is the discovery of disordered proteins
What Computation Has Done for Biology
Computational techniques have substantially sped up the process and expanded the scope of biological research
The sequence-comparison program BLAST has been cited ~70,000 times in the published literature!
it is rare nowadays to have a biology paper not citing any bioinformatics software tools!
The software MolProbity has transformed the field of X-ray and NMR-based structural solution of bio-molecules since its inception in 2003
the average quality of all the solved protein structures in the PDB database has improved at a constant rate on an annual basis due to its application
What Computation Has Done for Biology
Computation vs Biology: NowBased on omic data of cancer vs normal tissues, people can start to predict cancer diagnostic markers in blood/urine
identification of differentially expressed genes/proteins in cancer vsnormal tissuescomputational prediction of proteins that can secret into blood and/or excrete into urineexperimental validation of the predicted biomarkers in blood/urine
21 urine samples of gastric cancer patients vs 21 samples of healthy people
Endothelial lipase (LIPG)
Computation vs Biology: NowBased on our understanding about DNA replication & DNA repair, one could possibly derive evolutionary history from normal to cancer genome
Hence possibly identify key early mutations in cancer genome
Philadelphia and CML
Gleevec
Tighter integrations of biology and computation allow to tackle substantially more challenging biological problems
Computation vs Biology: NowIntegration of sophisticated modeling capabilities and high-performance computing allows to study complex biological systems and behavior
understanding complex relationship between human microbiome and human health; interactions between microbes and plants
Computation vs Biology: NowLarge amounts of biological data allow elucidation of fundamental rules and principles of biological systems
we discovered genomic locations of genes in prokaryotes follow simple rules: gene locations minimize an energy function
This realization enables a new type of genome analysis capability, making previously challenging problems solvable
prokaryotic genomic contig assembly
Computation vs Biology: Now
Challengesneed to train a new generation of biologists with quantitative skills and capable of utilizing large quantities of biological data
require changes in biological curricula at the level of high-school, college and graduate school
need to let the educational leaders understand and recognize this change and the new needs
Future of Computational BiologyComputational biology could lead the way in elucidation of complex biological systems like cancer formation and progression or biosynthesis of plant cell walls
plant cell wall
cancer pathways
Future of Computational Biology
Modeling of human diseases as systems biology problems by taking into consideration of multiple factors
Personalized medicine will be well developed taking into consideration of genomic data and real time omic data, which will involve sophisticated modeling and decision making
Future of Computational BiologyOmic data will be omnipresent in our daily lives, thanks to the next generations of omic techniques
individual genomesreal-time omic data collected at annual physicals like blood chemistry reports now…
A new professional, omic data analysts, will emerge in a big way like IT professionals today, needed everywhere!
hospitals, biotech companies, insurance industry, genome (omic data)-based counseling of various types……
Future of Computational BiologyElucidation of specific rules and principles about individual biological systems will merge and evolve into “Theories of Biology”, which will fundamentally change the empirical nature of biological sciences today
Biology will become a science like physics as Temple Smith predicted 10 years ago; and biological experiments will be guided by theories rather than through trial-and-error
Take-Home MessageComputational biology, coupled with high-throughput omicdata generation, is revolutionizing biology and associated sciences
New flood of biological data about ourselves (e.g., individual genomes) are coming in a big way
We clearly need to prepare our future students and the society adequately
AcknowledgementMy colleagues at CSBL @ UGA
Dr. Juan CuiDr. Xizeng MaoDr. Yanbin Yin
Funding agenciesNSF, DOE, NIH, Georgia Research Alliance
A special issue on “Computational Challenges from Modern Biology” in JCST (2010)
14 articles by leading researchers like Michael Waterman, David Sankoff, Satoru Miyano, ….