computer modeling of structure to earthquake load
TRANSCRIPT
Computer Modeling ofStructure to Earthquake Load
ByJohn Li ([email protected])Solutions Research Centre
Solutions Research Centre
How Do Earthquake Affect Buildings
EarthquakeSeismic wavesSite/soil effectsSoil-structureinteractionStructuralresponse
Solutions Research Centre
Ground Motion Parameters
For engineering purposes, threecharacteristics of earthquake motion are ofprimary significance:
AmplitudeFrequency contentDuration of the motion
Solutions Research Centre
Newton Equation of Motion
Building codes provide guidelines for:F(t)Computation method to solve equationSolution interpretation and design
[ ]{ } [ ]{ } [ ]{ }xMxCxKtFMatF
&&& ++==
)()(
Solutions Research Centre
Earthquake Analysis Procedure
Modal/Ritz Vectors Analysis
Equivalent Lateral Load
Static Pushover
Response Spectrum
Linear Time History
Nonlinear Time History
Solutions Research Centre
Energy Conservation
Energy is the fundamental in dynamic analysis.For earthquake resistant design, try tominimize the mechanical energy.Use to evaluate the accuracy of the solution.
StrainEnergy+Kinetic
Energy=MechanicalEnergy
DampedEnergy+Strain
Energy+KineticEnergy=Work
Done
Solutions Research Centre
P-Delta Parameters
Non-iterative –Based on MassIterative – Basedon LoadCombination
Solutions Research Centre
Modal Vs Ritz Vectors
Solutions Research Centre
Equivalent Lateral Force Method
)1(
1
nekn
jjj
iii F
HW
HWF δ−=
∑=
Solutions Research Centre
Response Spectrum Analysis
Solutions Research Centre
Time History Record24538-S2486-94020.06 SANTA MONICA - CITY HALL GROUNDS AT 90 DEG3000 POINTS OF ACCEL DATA EQUALLY SPACED AT .020 SEC. (UNITS: CM/SEC/SEC) 2.321 1.647 .854 -.188 -1.492 -.155 1.559 1.468 1.468 .234 -1.725 -.507 .331 .014 1.031 1.911 1.272 -1.191 -.432 .994 1.705 1.341 -1.266 -1.638 -.495 3.286 4.705 -.057 -2.141 .031 2.391 3.937 3.209 -1.892 -4.787 -.361 4.965 2.778 -.768 -1.933 -3.859 -1.514 .460 -.759 -3.399 -1.470 5.361 .499 -3.190 -2.014 -6.361 -.327 5.597 -.284 -6.629 -1.982 3.192 -3.786 -5.605 -3.604 -3.588 1.536 1.673 .285 -2.091 -4.786 .461 1.878 6.096 6.154 -.362 -.090 8.028 15.086 9.537 2.588 -3.574 -1.133 2.995 -5.163 -12.471 -9.782 -4.950 -5.719 -9.039 -8.594 -7.362 -5.799 .590 6.948 5.881 1.054 5.206 7.877 .808 -8.184 -11.273 -6.557 -4.386 -5.915 -8.621 -6.395 4.616 11.018 7.740 4.030 7.361 13.319 14.179 13.029 12.126 7.768 1.784 -4.704 -10.645 -15.894 -16.559 -9.928 -4.541 3.332 10.073 5.642 1.994 5.629 6.987 3.263 -6.605 -14.153 -9.129 .915 .638 -7.667 -9.769 -11.986 -8.324 -4.435 -7.603 -8.013 -5.754 3.932 17.271 17.645 5.381 2.855 5.636 6.088 3.796 2.630 6.783 8.365 5.489 2.831
Solutions Research Centre
Time History Function
Solutions Research Centre
Time History Analysis
Solutions Research Centre
Time History Trace
Solutions Research Centre
Time History Video
Solutions Research Centre
Nonlinear Time History Analysis
Full nonlinear behavior may be considered in a time-history analysis using direct integration. P-delta effects,large-displacements, and material nonlinearity areavailable. Arbitrary loading may be applied. Applicationsinclude seismic loading, dynamic pushover, andinstability analysis. Most commonly used implicitintegration schemes are available, as well as high-speedexplicit integration for wave propagation, blast, andcollapse problems. Nonlinear direct-integration time-history analysis cases can be chained together with othernonlinear time-history or static cases (including stagedconstruction), to address a wide range of applications.
Solutions Research Centre
Nonlinear NLLink Element
LinearDamperGapHookPlasitc1Isolator1Isolator2
Solutions Research Centre
Nonlinear Time History
Solutions Research Centre
Energy Plots
Solutions Research Centre
Pushover Curve
M3 Major MomentP AxialPMM Axial & Bi-Axial MomentsS Shear
Solutions Research Centre
Pushover Hinge Types
M3 Major MomentP AxialPMM Axial & Bi-Axial MomentsS Shear
Solutions Research Centre
Pushover Analysis Case
Solutions Research Centre
Hinge Formation
Solutions Research Centre
Pushover Curve
Solutions Research Centre
The Reality!!
Dynamic Testing and Modelling of Existing Buildings in Hong Kong by DrRay Su, Prof Adrian Chandler, Prof Peter Lee, Dr Alex To & Mr J H Li.
1.5401.7892.1232.3362.835Torsion
TRB Building
0.8601.1481.4011.3021.588Y Trans
BSB Building
0.5780.6610.7271.2871.622Y Trans
TTT Building
321
TestResult
ModificationsBareFrame
Vibration Period (second)Vibration
Mode
Solutions Research Centre
Power Spectral Density Analysis
Power-spectral-density analysis is available to determinethe probabilistic response of a structure due to cyclic(harmonic, sinusoidal) loading over a range offrequencies. This is useful for fatigue studies, randomresponse due to earthquakes, and other applications.Multiple loads may be applied at different phase angles,and may be correlated or uncorrelated. The structuremay be damped or undamped. Frequency-dependentstiffness and damping (complex impedance) propertiesmay be included for modeling foundations and far-fieldeffects, including radiation damping. Power-spectral-density curves may be plotted for any response quantity,and the integrated expected value is automaticallycomputed.