Conclusions and Recommendations

MISP• MISP materials – ‘culturally modified’ -

disseminate IEC materials• Disaster Risk Reduction is important to donors• Agencies need to increase evidence base –

preparedness value• Mapping of 3 Ws – who, what, where – gaps,

accountable; • What is an emergency? less than 12 months• Pilot and scale up??• IAWG w/s

Training Partnership• Not official working group- 5-6 yrs group

Training Partnership initiative• Quick outreach clinical trainings on topics –

standard precautions, MVA etc – short course, piloted

• Now stalled with funding ended• ‘Normal’ training in-service, refresher,

mentoring,– in crisis is not a priority• TOR and Chair – CB focus; 6 mths monthly

Voluntary contraception

• Advocate for VC for populations in crisis• Add FP as 6th pillar of MISP? – there in FM• International Best Practice – shared and used• Review of kits for VC supplies – WHO?

MNH (email group)• EMoNC Guidelines – review and revise?• Newborn birthday issue – include specific• Key studies to present at next IAWG• Task shifting – review WHO Guidelines; Lisa• Newborn care in emergencies group –

Guidance/kit – complete over summer• Perinatal audits inc with Maternal death audits• Fistula issues – case studies in key countries –

present next IAWG• PAC – Misoprostol use?• WHO Country Risk Assessment - ?SRH integrated

HIV and AIDS• Sliding out of SRH agenda – HIV is pillar of

MISP• More crisis affected people on ARVs (e.g

CAR on ARVs 14,00, now 12,000)• Link with IATT and SPRINT on common

objectives• Increase advocacy and support at onset of

emergency• Include PLWHA in preparedness and advocacy

Adolescent

• 3 youth who responded to Washi included• Expand membership of group to adolescents• Integrate adolescent concerns into MDG

agenda – document good practices• Link better with MISP and VC WG• Advocate to be more Adol inclusive• Materials disseminated tools to field• Inform adolescents on actions, so they can

take it on more and feed into process

ESEAOR WG• UNFPA, IFRC, IPPF-SPRINT (6 countries), FPOP• Regional coordination mechanisms? WHO regional

coordination • Regional research coordination• Regional MISP training • Challenges about regional boundaries – diversity in

Asia and Pacific• Health system capacity very different - country• Turnover of trained staff• SRH org have focal point for Emergency• Best Practices Indonesia UNFPA 2005-2012

Research • What data do we need to collect? Confusing• What indicators do we need to collect? More

research – how valid?• Where aggregated? • Identify existing databases – country, org• Data flow• Bimonthly conference call to discuss progress

Interesting areas to think about more

• What can we do about Syria? –working group • Issue of integrating SRH with other sectors is

important, but needs to be addressed clearly and limited (e.g from HIV-SRH integration)

• Opportunities for Humanitarian Research – DfID/Wellcome - ?collaborative proposal

• Coordination amongst agencies – eg adolescents, VC – need to include clearly in MISP as stand-alone?

• Funding source for short trainings? Need and case built?

• Links to ISDR and other global groups• IFRC needs to buy into IAWG – regional? esp

for DRR• IAWG better link in – same members

Conclusions

• We are all IAWG• IAWG evolves and responds to members• Common goal of improving lives of people in

crisis and emergencies with focus on women and children

• This can only be done when we coordinate How can we work better together before, during after crises?