conformal dynamics from lhc to cosmologypyweb.swan.ac.uk/~pybl/largentalks/sannino.pdfprogress in...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Francesco Sannino
Swansea 2009
C P 3 - O r i g i n s
Particle Physics & Origins of Mass
Conformal Dynamics from LHC to Cosmology
-
Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking
Unparticle Physics
.....
-
Natural Asymmetric Dark Matter*
Electroweak Baryogenesis
* Decaying, Composite, ...
-
We can probe the dynamics of our extensions
-
Technicolor
-
Dynamical EW Breaking
-
Dynamical EW Breaking
L(H)→ −14F aµνF aµν + i Q̄γ
µDµQ + · · ·
-
Dynamical EW Breaking
Dots are partially fixed by Anomalies as well as other principles
L(H)→ −14F aµνF aµν + i Q̄γ
µDµQ + · · ·
-
Dynamical EW Breaking
Dots are partially fixed by Anomalies as well as other principles
L(H)→ −14F aµνF aµν + i Q̄γ
µDµQ + · · ·
· · · → L(New SM Fermions)
-
Technicolor
New Strong Interactions at ~ 250 GeV [Weinberg, Susskind]
-
Technicolor
New Strong Interactions at ~ 250 GeV [Weinberg, Susskind]
Natural to use QCD-like dynamics.
-
Technicolor
New Strong Interactions at ~ 250 GeV [Weinberg, Susskind]
Natural to use QCD-like dynamics.
-
Technicolor
New Strong Interactions at ~ 250 GeV [Weinberg, Susskind]
Natural to use QCD-like dynamics.
-
Large & Positive S from QCD-like Technicolor
1 TeV
SU(3) + 1 Fund. Doublet
S
T
Kennedy-Lynn, Peskin-Takeuchi, Altarelli-Barbieri, Bertolini- Sirlin, Marciano-Rosner
Weinberg, Susskind
-
Walking versus Running
-
Near Conformal Properties
-
Near Conformal Properties
-
Near Conformal Properties
-
Near Conformal Properties
Appelquist, Bowick, Chivukula, Cohen, Eichten, Georgi, Hill, Holdom, Karabali, Lane, Mahanta, Miransky, Shrock, Simmons, Terning, Wijewardhana, Yamawaki
-
S in Walking Technicolor
-
S in Walking Technicolor
Appelquist, F.S.SWTC < STC
-
S in Walking Technicolor
We will take as an estimate:
Appelquist, F.S.SWTC < STC
-
S in Walking Technicolor
We will take as an estimate:
Appelquist, F.S.SWTC < STC
SWTC ≈ Snaive =16π
Nf2
d(R)
-
Rule:
Find Walking Theories with EW embedding minimizing S
-
Viable Models
(Ultra) Minimal Walking Technicolor (MWT)
Higher Dimensional Representations
Beyond Minimal Walking Technicolor
Partially EW Gauged Technicolor
Split Technicolor
Additional Fermions in SM
Custodial TC
-
Dark Matter
ΩDMΩB
∼ 5
-
Technicolor is a natural example(TIMP)
-
Technibarion is similar to the nucleon
Technicolor is a natural example(TIMP)
-
Technibarion is similar to the nucleon
TB number like the B number
Technicolor is a natural example(TIMP)
-
Technibarion is similar to the nucleon
TB number like the B number
At most EW-type cross sections
Technicolor is a natural example(TIMP)
-
Technibarion is similar to the nucleon
TB number like the B number
At most EW-type cross sections
EW scale and interactions built in
Technicolor is a natural example(TIMP)
-
Technibarion is similar to the nucleon
TB number like the B number
At most EW-type cross sections
EW scale and interactions built in
Technicolor is a natural example(TIMP)
Nussinov, 86Barr - Chivukula - Farhi 90Sarkar 96Gudnason - Kouvaris - F.S. 06
-
Technibarion is similar to the nucleon
TB number like the B number
At most EW-type cross sections
EW scale and interactions built in
Technicolor is a natural example(TIMP)
Nussinov, 86Barr - Chivukula - Farhi 90Sarkar 96Gudnason - Kouvaris - F.S. 06
Ultra Minimal Technicolor is the first physical realization Ryttov - F.S. 08
PAMELA/ATIC Decaying Dark Matter + Unification, Nardi, F.S., Strumia, 08.
-
Plus sign minus signCDMS II Ge CombinedXENON10 2007 Projected superCDMS
Foadi, Frandsen, F.S. 08
(GeV)
10 50 100 500 1000 5000 1! 10410"45
10"44
10"43
10"42
10"41MΦ
Σnucleon!cm"
2 "
σnucleon =µ2
4π
[Z
A
8π α dBΛ2
+dM fmNM2HMφ
]2
µ = MφmN/(Mφ + mN )
MH = 300 GeV
dB = ±1Λ =3 TeV
dM = 1
Earth Based Constraints
-
Asymmetric DM Relic Density
mTBmp
≈ 1 TeV1 GeV
= 103
-
Asymmetric DM Relic Density
mTBmp
≈ 1 TeV1 GeV
= 103
TB
B∝ exp
[−mTB(T
∗)T ∗
]∼ 10−3
-
Asymmetric DM Relic Density
mTBmp
≈ 1 TeV1 GeV
= 103
TB
B∝ exp
[−mTB(T
∗)T ∗
]∼ 10−3 T ∗ ∼ 200 GeV
-
Asymmetric DM Relic Density
mTBmp
≈ 1 TeV1 GeV
= 103
TB
B∝ exp
[−mTB(T
∗)T ∗
]∼ 10−3 T ∗ ∼ 200 GeV
ΩTBΩB
=TB
B
mTBmp
∼ O(1)
-
Strong Dynamics
-
Gauge Theory Knobs
-
Gauge Theory Knobs
Gauge Group, i.e. SU, SO, SP
-
Gauge Theory Knobs
Gauge Group, i.e. SU, SO, SP
Matter Representation
-
Gauge Theory Knobs
Gauge Group, i.e. SU, SO, SP
Matter Representation
# of Flavors per Representation
-
Gauge Theory Knobs
Gauge Group, i.e. SU, SO, SP
Matter Representation
# of Flavors per Representation
Temperature
-
Gauge Theory Knobs
Gauge Group, i.e. SU, SO, SP
Matter Representation
# of Flavors per Representation
Matter Density (i.e. Chemical Potential)
Temperature
-
Progress in Strong Dynamics
-
Progress in Strong Dynamics
Analytically observed a universal picture
-
Progress in Strong Dynamics
F.S. and Tuominen 04Dietrich, F.S. 06
Ryttov, F.S. 07 Phase Diagrams for any representation
SU(N), SO(N) and Sp(2N)
F.S. 09
Analytically observed a universal picture
-
Progress in Strong Dynamics
F.S. and Tuominen 04Dietrich, F.S. 06
Ryttov, F.S. 07 Phase Diagrams for any representation
SU(N), SO(N) and Sp(2N)
F.S. 09
Analytically observed a universal picture
Chiral Gauge Theories
Georgi Glashow & Bars YankielowiczAppelquist, Duan, F.S. 99
-
Analytic methods
-
Analytic methods
Truncated Schwinger - Dyson (SD)(Higher Dim. Rep.)
F.S. and TuominenDietrich, F.S.
-
Analytic methods
SD for the Fund. Rep.
Appelquist, Chivukula, Cohen, Georgi, Holdom, KarabaliMahanta, Miransky, Terning, Wijewardhana, Yamawaki.
Truncated Schwinger - Dyson (SD)(Higher Dim. Rep.)
F.S. and TuominenDietrich, F.S.
-
Analytic methods
Conjectured all-orders beta function Ryttov, F.S.
SD for the Fund. Rep.
Appelquist, Chivukula, Cohen, Georgi, Holdom, KarabaliMahanta, Miransky, Terning, Wijewardhana, Yamawaki.
Truncated Schwinger - Dyson (SD)(Higher Dim. Rep.)
F.S. and TuominenDietrich, F.S.
-
Thermal Degree of Freedom Appelquist, Cohen, Schmaltz
-
Novel ‘t Hooft anomaly matching result.
Identified a potential QCD DualF.S. posted on the arXiv yesterday
Thermal Degree of Freedom Appelquist, Cohen, Schmaltz
-
Method Fund-Rep Higher Rep. Multiple Rep. γ Susy‘t Hooft AMC
BF + + + + + +
SD + + - + - -
Thermal + - - - + -
Applicability
-
Method Fund-Rep Higher Rep. Multiple Rep. γ Susy‘t Hooft AMC
BF + + + + + +
SD + + - + - -
Thermal + - - - + -
Note:
SU(2) Fund.Thermal prediction is not close to SD F.S. 09
Applicability
-
Progress in Strong Dynamics II:
-
Progress in Strong Dynamics II:
Lattice
-
Progress in Strong Dynamics II:
Lattice
Any Rep.
-
Progress in Strong Dynamics II:
Lattice
Any Rep. Fund. Rep
-
Progress in Strong Dynamics II:
Catterall, F.S. 07Catterall, Giedt, F.S., Schneible 08Del Debbio, Frandsen, Panagopoulos, F.S. 08Del Debbio, Patella, Pica. 08Hietanen, Rantaharju, Rummukainen, Tuominen 08DeGrand, Shamir, Svetitsky, 08Del Debbio, Patella, Pica, 08
Lattice
Any Rep. Fund. Rep
-
Progress in Strong Dynamics II:
Catterall, F.S. 07Catterall, Giedt, F.S., Schneible 08Del Debbio, Frandsen, Panagopoulos, F.S. 08Del Debbio, Patella, Pica. 08Hietanen, Rantaharju, Rummukainen, Tuominen 08DeGrand, Shamir, Svetitsky, 08Del Debbio, Patella, Pica, 08
Lattice
Appelquist, Fleming, Neil 07 Deuzman, Lombardo, Pallante 08Fodor, Holland, Kuti, Nogradi, Schroeder, 08
Any Rep. Fund. Rep
-
Universal Picture
-
Fund
2A
2S Adj
Ladder
SU(N) Phase Diagram
Ryttov and F.S. 07All Orders Beta Function
-
Fund
2A
2S Adj
Ladder
γ = 1
SU(N) Phase Diagram
Ryttov and F.S. 07All Orders Beta Function
-
Fund
2A
2S Adj
Ladder
γ = 1 γ = 2
SU(N) Phase Diagram
Ryttov and F.S. 07All Orders Beta Function
-
Fund
2A
2S Adj
LadderIwasaki et al.
γ = 1 γ = 2
SU(N) Phase Diagram
Ryttov and F.S. 07All Orders Beta Function
-
Fund
2A
2S Adj
LadderIwasaki et al.
Appelquist, Fleming, NeilDeuzeman, Lombardo, Pallante
γ = 1 γ = 2
SU(N) Phase Diagram
Ryttov and F.S. 07All Orders Beta Function
-
Fund
2A
2S Adj
LadderIwasaki et al.
Appelquist, Fleming, NeilDeuzeman, Lombardo, Pallante
γ = 1 γ = 2
SU(N) Phase Diagram
Ryttov and F.S. 07All Orders Beta Function
-
Fund
2A
2S Adj
Ladder
Catterall, SanninoDel Debbio, Patella,PicaCatterall, Giedt, Sannino, Schneible
Iwasaki et al.
Appelquist, Fleming, NeilDeuzeman, Lombardo, Pallante
γ = 1 γ = 2
SU(N) Phase Diagram
Ryttov and F.S. 07All Orders Beta Function
-
Fund
2A
2S Adj
Ladder
Catterall, SanninoDel Debbio, Patella,PicaCatterall, Giedt, Sannino, Schneible
Iwasaki et al.
Appelquist, Fleming, NeilDeuzeman, Lombardo, Pallante
×
×
γ = 1 γ = 2
SU(N) Phase Diagram
Ryttov and F.S. 07All Orders Beta Function
-
Fund
2A
2S Adj
Ladder
Catterall, SanninoDel Debbio, Patella,PicaCatterall, Giedt, Sannino, Schneible
Iwasaki et al.
Appelquist, Fleming, NeilDeuzeman, Lombardo, Pallante
×
×
γ = 1 γ = 2
Shamir, Svetitsky, DeGrand
SU(N) Phase Diagram
Ryttov and F.S. 07All Orders Beta Function
-
5 6 7 8 9 100
5
10
15
20
N
Nf
A.F.B.F. & γ= 2 SD
SO(N)
SO(N) Phase Diagram
F.S. 09All Orders Beta Function
-
Sp(2N) Phase Diagram
F.S. 09All Orders Beta Function2 3 4 5 60
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
N
N Wf
A.F. B.F. & γ= 2 SD
SP(2N)
-
Sensible Models of DEWSB
-
Minimal Walking Technicolor
-
SU(3)
SU(2)
U(1)
F.S. + Tuominen 04Dietrich, F.S., Tuominen 05
-
SU(3)
SU(2)
U(1)
U
D
Gt-up
t-down
t-glue SU(2)
NExtraNeutrino
EExtra Electron
U and D: Adj of SU(2)
F.S. + Tuominen 04Dietrich, F.S., Tuominen 05
-
MWT Features
-
The most economical WT theory
MWT Features
-
The most economical WT theory
Compatible with precision measurements
MWT Features
-
The most economical WT theory
Compatible with precision measurements
Possible DM candidates and nice Unification
MWT Features
-
The most economical WT theory
Compatible with precision measurements
Possible DM candidates and nice Unification
Can support 1st order Electroweak Phase Transition
MWT Features
-
The most economical WT theory
Compatible with precision measurements
Possible DM candidates and nice Unification
Can support 1st order Electroweak Phase Transition
Can support exotic electric charges
MWT Features
-
The most economical WT theory
Compatible with precision measurements
Possible DM candidates and nice Unification
Can support 1st order Electroweak Phase Transition
Can support exotic electric charges
Lattice studies have begun
MWT Features
-
MWT effective lagrangian
L(Composites) + L(Mixing with SM) + L(New Leptons) + L(SM−Higgs)
R. Foadi, M. T. Frandsen, Ryttov, F.S. 07
Appelquist, F.S. 99
-
MWT effective lagrangian
L(Composites) + L(Mixing with SM) + L(New Leptons) + L(SM−Higgs)
R. Foadi, M. T. Frandsen, Ryttov, F.S. 07
Appelquist, F.S. 99
-
Drell-Yan production of heavy vectors
Vector Boson Fusion production of heavy vectors
Light Composite Higgs can be studied via HW and HZ production
MWT effective lagrangian
L(Composites) + L(Mixing with SM) + L(New Leptons) + L(SM−Higgs)
LHC - Signals
A. Belyaev, R. Foadi, M. T. Frandsen, M. O. Jarvinen, A. Pukhov, F.S. 08
R. Foadi, M. T. Frandsen, Ryttov, F.S. 07
Appelquist, F.S. 99
-
Ultra Minimal Walking Technicolor
-
SU(3)
SU(2)
U(1)
Ryttov and F.S. 08
-
SU(3)
SU(2)
U(1)
U
D
Gt-up
t-down
t-glue SU(2)
λ2λ1t-lambda
U and D: Fund of SU(2)
t-lambdas: Adj of SU(2) Singlet of SM
Weyl FermionsRyttov and F.S. 08
-
UMT Features
-
The most economical “2 rep” WT theory
UMT Features
-
The most economical “2 rep” WT theory
Smallest naive S-parameter & # of fermions
UMT Features
-
The most economical “2 rep” WT theory
Smallest naive S-parameter & # of fermions
Asymmetric DM candidate visible at the LHC
UMT Features
-
The most economical “2 rep” WT theory
Smallest naive S-parameter & # of fermions
Asymmetric DM candidate visible at the LHC
Extra Electroweak PT (very exciting)
UMT Features
-
The most economical “2 rep” WT theory
Smallest naive S-parameter & # of fermions
Asymmetric DM candidate visible at the LHC
Extra Electroweak PT (very exciting)
Rich unexplored Collider Phenomenology
UMT Features
-
Summary
-
• DEWSB is very much alive
Summary
-
• DEWSB is very much alive
• DEWSB Cosmology is exciting
Summary
-
• DEWSB is very much alive
• DEWSB Cosmology is exciting
• 4D Non-SUSY CFT
Summary
-
Besides
-
Besides
S = S(W )TC + SNS
-
Besides
S = S(W )TC + SNS
-
Besides
S = S(W )TC + SNS
Offset the first term
-
Besides
S = S(W )TC + SNS
Offset the first term
SLeptons =16π
[1− 2Y ln
(M1M2
)2+
1 + 8Y20
(mZM1
)2+
1− 8Y20
(mZM2
)2+ O
(m4ZM4i
)]