congenital diaphragmatic hernia antenatal diagnosis diagnosis van mieghem… · 06/10/2013 1 tim...

21
06/10/2013 1 Tim Van Mieghem Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Antenatal Diagnosis Overview introduction diagnosing CDH tips and tricks outcome prediction ultrasound MRI functional tests

Upload: truongbao

Post on 02-Sep-2018

235 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

06/10/2013

1

Tim Van Mieghem

Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Antenatal Diagnosis

Overview

• introduction

• diagnosing CDH – tips and tricks

• outcome prediction

ultrasound

MRI

functional tests

06/10/2013

2

incidence 1/2000-4000

85% left sided

13% right sided

2% bilateral

25% anatomical anomalies

20% chromosomal anomalies

Epidemiology

Survival isolated CDH

61 %

n=146

78 %

n=167

72 %

n=105 79 %

n=117

71 %

n=1222

70%

n=63

70 %

n=86

06/10/2013

3

Prenatal statistics

19%

4%

30%

47%

TOP

IUFD

NND

live at discharge

Gallot et al, UOG 2007; Central France Birth Registry 1986-2003

Overview

• introduction

• diagnosing CDH – tips and tricks

• outcome prediction

ultrasound

MRI

functional tests

06/10/2013

4

Prenatal Diagnosis

Diaphragm

hypoechogenic line between lungs – viscera

13 wk 21 wk

Prenatal Diagnosis

prenatal diagnosis = 60-80%

06/10/2013

5

Paradoxical breathing

06/10/2013

6

Liver herniation

Right sided CDH

Conturso UOG 2012

‘Horizontal stomach’

13 wks 24 wks

06/10/2013

7

Bilateral CDH

Hiasa et al. Clin Imaging 2012

Overview

• introduction

• diagnosing CDH – tips and tricks

• outcome prediction

ultrasound

MRI

functional tests

06/10/2013

8

In ISOLATED CDH

Pathology

pulmonary

hypoplasia

pulmonary

hypertension

06/10/2013

9

Outcome prediction: LHR

Learning curve

N=77

Cruz-Martinez, UOG 2010

LHR @ 22-29 weeks

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

<0.7 0.8-0.9 1.0-1.1 1.2-1.3 1.4-1.5 >1.6

Lung to Head Ratio (mm)

Surv

ival

rat

e (

%)

Outcome prediction: LHR

Jani et al 2006

06/10/2013

10

Prediction: O/E LHR

OBSERVED Fetal Lung Area

(fetus at risk for lung hypoplasia)

area measured

0.5

EXPECTED Fetal Lung Area

(matched normal fetus)

matched fetus

based on

gestational age

area predicted

2.0

O/E = 25%

Liver herniation Antenatal CDH registry 2006

Survival: 75% → 53%

Prediction: liver

06/10/2013

11

< 15 15-25 26-35 36-45

O/E LHR (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Surv

ival

rat

e (

%)

46 and higher

extreme

liver in abdomen (“down”) liver in thorax (“up”)

severe moderate mild

Clinical algorithm

Deprest J et al, Sem Fetal Neonat Med, 2008 - n= 329.

Isolated CDH expectantly managed (n=100)

Jani et al UOG 2008

≤ 25 26-45 >45

Patch rate (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

O/E LHR (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Conventional ventilation

day

s

≤ 25 26-45 >45

O/E LHR (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Enteral feeding

day

s

<25 26-45 >45

O/E LHR (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

NICU**

day

s

<25 26-45 >45

O/E LHR (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

≤ 25 26-45 >45

O/E LHR (%)

Oxygen O2 at 28d (%)

100

Morbidity

06/10/2013

12

Problems with 2D-US

Single plane

Single lung

3D volume

Both lungs

Solutions

06/10/2013

13

3D ultrasound

Ruano JUM 2013

3D volume

Both lungs

Solutions

06/10/2013

14

≤ 25 26-35 36-45 > 45

Observed to expected total FLV (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Surv

ival

rat

e (%

)

≤ 25 26-35 36-45 > 45

Observed to expected total FLV (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Surv

ival

rat

e (%

)

Liver down

Liver up: Survival 50% - volume linear relation to survival Liver down: Survival 75% - volume is not predictive of outcome

Cannie et al UOG 2008

20% survival rate

~ 33%

MRI volumetry

Liver up

Lee et al. J Ped Surg 2011

Morbidity prediction MRI

06/10/2013

15

Liver-thorax ratio

Cannie et al, UOG2008 – Lazar J Pediatr Surg 2012

0 10 20 30 40 50

LiTR (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

o/e

TF

LV

(%

)

Cannie et al. Radiology 2008 Rypens et al. Radiology 2001

MRI - nomograms

06/10/2013

16

Isolated CDH born alive >30 wks, paired observations (n=76)

False positive rate (%)

Sen

siti

vity

(%

)

100 75 50 25 0

100

75

50

25

0

2D-US

MRI

Cannie et al UOG 2008

2D-US vs. MRI

Kehl et al. JUM 2013

3D-US vs. MRI

Survival Need ECMO

06/10/2013

17

Overview

• introduction

• diagnosing CDH – tips and tricks

• outcome prediction

ultrasound

MRI

functional tests

Current problems

pulmonary hypoplasia

pulmonary

hypertension

pulmonary hypoplasia

06/10/2013

18

Functional tests

Pulmonary artery Doppler

Hyperoxygenation test

3D lung vascularity

Fractional moving blood volumes

Pulmonary artery Doppler

Cruz-Martinez UOG 2013

06/10/2013

19

UOG 2011

PAH

No PAH

DEATH PAH

06/10/2013

20

Fractional moving blood volume

Cruz-Martinez FD&T 2010

Conclusions

• CDH is diagnosed in (only) 60-80%

• outcome prediction isolated cases:

ultrasound (O/E LHR – liver)

MRI (lung volume – LiTR)

• functional tests experimental

06/10/2013

21

Thank you !

[email protected]