congenital scoliosis

59
Congenital Scoliosis Richard C Rooney, MD, FACS [email protected]

Upload: richard-c-rooney-md-facs

Post on 05-Apr-2017

97 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Congenital scoliosis

Congenital Scoliosis

Richard C Rooney, MD, [email protected]

Page 2: Congenital scoliosis

ClassificationDefects of Segmentaion

Defects of FormationComplex Spine Deformities

• Proposed by Moe et al– Early concept

• Van Schrick• Mac Ewen

• Accepted by SRS and AAOS• Simplistic

– Ignores current understanding of embryogenesis– Does not explain all deformities

Page 3: Congenital scoliosis

Tsou et al, Clinical Ortho and Related Research, No. 152, 1980

Page 4: Congenital scoliosis
Page 5: Congenital scoliosis
Page 6: Congenital scoliosis

Embryonic Period Anomalies1st 56 Days

• Germinal layer adhesion• Notochord substance sequestration• Asynchronous hemimetameric pair

development• Hemimetamer hypoplasia and aplasia• Ventral and lateral process coalition

Page 7: Congenital scoliosis
Page 8: Congenital scoliosis

Tsou et al, Clinical Ortho and Related Research, No. 152, 1980

Page 9: Congenital scoliosis

Tsou et al, Clinical Ortho and Related Research, No. 152, 1980

Hedequist and Emans, Congenital Scoliosis, Journal of AAOS, 2004

Page 10: Congenital scoliosis

Tsou et al, Clinical Ortho and Related Research, No. 152, 1980

Page 11: Congenital scoliosis

Fetal Period Anomalies57th day to Birth

• Vertebral joint failure of segmentation• Centrum hypoplasia and aplasia

Page 12: Congenital scoliosis

Tsou et al, Clinical Ortho and Related Research, No. 152, 1980

Page 13: Congenital scoliosis

Tsou et al, Clinical Ortho and Related Research, No. 152, 1980

Page 14: Congenital scoliosis

Tsou et al, Clinical Ortho and Related Research, No. 152, 1980

Page 15: Congenital scoliosis

Tsou et al, Clinical Ortho and Related Research, No. 152, 1980

Page 16: Congenital scoliosis

Tsou et al, Clinical Ortho and Related Research, No. 152, 1980

Page 17: Congenital scoliosis

Tsou et al, Clinical Ortho and Related Research, No. 152, 1980

Page 18: Congenital scoliosis

Tsou et al, Clinical Ortho and Related Research, No. 152, 1980

Page 19: Congenital scoliosis

Lonstein, Congenital Spine Deformities, Ortho Clinics of NA, Vol 30, No.3, 1999

Page 20: Congenital scoliosis

Genetics• Wynne-Davies 1975

– 337 pts with congenital anomalies– Most were sporadic with no risk to subsequent siblings of

offspring– Multiple anomalies carried a 5~10% risk to sibs

• Winter 1983– 1200 pts– 1% with a known relative with a problem

• Most twin studies show one with a defect and one without• McMaster et al JBJS, 1999,

– Positive family hx with multiple levels of bilateral failure of segmentation, fused ribs, missing segments

– Spondylothoracic dysplasia or Jarcho-Levin syndrome

Page 21: Congenital scoliosis

Associated Anomlies• Renal 30% - Renal imaging is most important

image in pre-schoolers• Cardiac 15% - Evaluate murmurs, they are never

due to the scoliosis• Dysraphism 20+%

– Beware of skin anomalies– Leg length discrepancy– Neurological asymmetry

• Skeletal anomalies

Hedequist and Emans, Congenital Scoliosis, Journal of AAOS, Vol 12, No. 4, 2004

Page 22: Congenital scoliosis
Page 23: Congenital scoliosis
Page 24: Congenital scoliosis

Nomenclature• Segmented – has disc space• Incarcerated – adjacent level accommodates

hemi

Hedequist and Emans, Congenital Scoliosis, Journal of AAOS, Vol 12, No. 4, 2004

Page 25: Congenital scoliosis
Page 26: Congenital scoliosis

Midline Ectodermal Anomalies Correlate with Neural Anomalies

• Skin tag• Dimples• Pigmentation• Hair patch

Hedequist and Emans, Congenital Scoliosis, Journal of AAOS, Vol 12, No. 4, 2004

Page 27: Congenital scoliosis

Midline skin anomalies may mean neural anomalies

Page 28: Congenital scoliosis
Page 29: Congenital scoliosis

Hedequist and Emans, Congenital Scoliosis, Journal of AAOS, Vol 12, No. 4, 2004

Page 30: Congenital scoliosis

Evaluation of Entire Spinal Canal• Search for anomalies

– Chiari malformation– Syringomyelia– Diatematomyelis– Filum terminale– Lipoma– Tumor

• Indication– Pre-op– Neurologic deficit or asymmetry– Lower limb asymmetry– Every pt with a congenital defect?

Hedequist and Emans, Congenital Scoliosis, Journal of AAOS, Vol 12, No. 4, 2004

Page 31: Congenital scoliosis

Diastematomyelia

Page 32: Congenital scoliosis

Diastematomyelia Radiographic Signs

• Widened interpedicular distance• Narrowed disc• Midline calcification

Page 33: Congenital scoliosis

Winter Sign Asymmetrical forward bend is consistent with

a tethered cord

Page 34: Congenital scoliosis

Tethered Cord Not Just a Problem for Children• Adults can present with tethered cord symptoms

– Increasing pain or neurologic loss of function– Lower limb asymmetry or spasticity

• Do not be satisfied with images of only lumbar spine

Page 35: Congenital scoliosis

Lonstein, Congenital Spine Deformities, Ortho Clinics of NA, Vol 30, No.3, 1999

Page 36: Congenital scoliosis

Hedequist and Emans, Congenital Scoliosis, Journal of AAOS, Vol 12, No. 4, 2004

Page 37: Congenital scoliosis

Progression of Congenital Scoliosis

• Highly variable• “Most progress” (10~20% nonprogressive)

– Unilateral bar with contralateral hemi – worst– Unilateral unsegmented bar– Double hemivertebra– Single hemivertebra– Wedge vertebra– Block vertebra – best prognosis

McMaster and Ohtsuka,JBJS, vol 64, 1982

Page 38: Congenital scoliosis

Location

• Thoracic curves with poorest prognosis• Hemivertebra at lumbosacral and

cervicothoracic junction cause decompensation

Lonstein, Congenital Spine Deformities, Ortho Clinics of NA, Vol 30, No.3, 1999

Page 39: Congenital scoliosis

Non-operative Treatment• Observation

– Not for high risk– Hemivertebra and mixed deformity

• Bracing – limited role– Contraindicated for short stiff curves– ? Help for flexible curves

Page 40: Congenital scoliosis

Lonstein, Congenital Spine Deformities, Ortho Clinics of NA, Vol 30, No.3, 1999

Treated with Observation

Page 41: Congenital scoliosis

Hedequist and Emans, Congenital Scoliosis, Journal of AAOS, Vol 12, No. 4, 2004

Page 42: Congenital scoliosis

Surgical Rx

• Fusion-in-situ– Simple– Ineffective

• Anterior epiphysiodesis & posterior hemiarthrodesis– Progressive deformity– Growing patient

• Combined anterior posterior fusion• Hemivertebra excision

Page 43: Congenital scoliosis

Lonstein, Congenital Spine Deformities, Ortho Clinics of NA, Vol 30, No.3, 1999

Convex Growth Arrest at 2+8

Page 44: Congenital scoliosis

Hedequist and Emans, Congenital Scoliosis, Journal of AAOS, Vol 12, No. 4, 2004

Page 45: Congenital scoliosis

Lonstein, Congenital Spine Deformities, Ortho Clinics of NA, Vol 30, No.3, 1999

Ant excision of hemivert and post instrumentation and fusion

Page 46: Congenital scoliosis
Page 47: Congenital scoliosis
Page 48: Congenital scoliosis
Page 49: Congenital scoliosis
Page 50: Congenital scoliosis

Congenital Scoliosis with Myelodysplasia

Page 51: Congenital scoliosis
Page 52: Congenital scoliosis

Rx with ant discectomies post instr with pedicle screws at bifid vertebra and Galveston fixation

Page 53: Congenital scoliosis

Kyphosis• Kyphosis with centrum aplasia

– Sharp angular– Risk of paraplegia– Rx with circum-fusion +/- corpectomy

• Kyphosis with anterior bar– Less neuro risk id not operated– Surgical options customized

Page 54: Congenital scoliosis
Page 55: Congenital scoliosis
Page 56: Congenital scoliosis

Lordosis • Anterior fusion – small curve• Anterior / posterior procedure – large

curves

Page 57: Congenital scoliosis

Lonstein, Congenital Spine Deformities, Ortho Clinics of NA, Vol 30, No.3, 1999

Progressive lordosis treated with ant discectomies, post fusion, and post-op cast

Page 58: Congenital scoliosis

Lonstein, Congenital Spine Deformities, Ortho Clinics of NA, Vol 30, No.3, 1999

Page 59: Congenital scoliosis

Conclusion

• Embryogenesis can be analyzed• Progression is unpredictable with exceptions

– Bar with contralateral hemivertebra– Kyphosis due to centrum aplasia

• Treatment – Remove deforming growth elements– Fusion-in-situ is no better than placebo