connecting simulations with observations of the galactic center black hole

35
Connecting Simulations with Observations of the Galactic Center Black Hole Jason Dexter University of Washington With Eric Agol, Chris Fragile and Jon McKinney

Upload: chester-dunlap

Post on 30-Dec-2015

38 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Connecting Simulations with Observations of the Galactic Center Black Hole. Jason Dexter University of Washington. With Eric Agol, Chris Fragile and Jon McKinney. Exciting Observations of Accreting Black Holes. X-ray binaries State transitions QPOs Iron lines AGN QPO(?) Microlensing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Connecting Simulations with Observations of the

Galactic Center Black Hole

Jason DexterUniversity of Washington

With Eric Agol, Chris Fragile and Jon McKinney

Page 2: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Exciting Observations of Accreting Black Holes

• X-ray binaries– State transitions– QPOs– Iron lines

• AGN– QPO(?)– Microlensing– Multiwavelength

surveysUIUC CTA Seminar 2L / LEdd

MCG-6-30-15 Miniutti et al 2007

Fender et al (2004)Middleton et al (2010)

Page 3: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Galactic Center

UIUC CTA Seminar 3

Page 4: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Sagittarius A*

UIUC CTA Seminar 4

Jet or nonthermal electrons far from BH

Thermal electrons at BH

Simultaneous IR/x-ray flares close to BH?

no d

ata

avai

labl

e

no d

ata

avai

labl

eCharles Gammie

Page 5: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Sub-mm Sgr A*

• Precision black hole astrophysics• Need accurate emission models

5UIUC CTA Seminar

Doeleman et al (2008)

Gaussian FWHM ~4 Rs!

Page 6: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Black Hole Shadow

• Signature of event horizon• Sensitive to details of accretion flow

Bardeen (1973); Dexter & Agol (2009) Falcke, Melia & Agol (2000)

6UIUC CTA Seminar

Page 7: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Sgr A* Models• Quiescent:

– ADAF/RIAF or jet: steady state, no MRI, non-rel

• Toy flare models:-Hotspots-Expanding blobs-Density perturbations

But we have a more physical theory!

UIUC CTA Seminar 7

Page 8: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Global GRMHD

• Advantages:– Fully relativistic, 2D & 3D– Generate MRI, turbulence,

accretion

• Limitations:– Thermodynamics– Radiation– Spatial extent– Morphology

UIUC CTA Seminar 8

Gammie et al (2004)

Page 9: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

GRMHD Models of Sgr A*

• Sub-mm Sgr A* is an excellent application of GRMHD!– Thick accretion flow (ADAF/RIAF)– Insignificant cooling(?) (L/Ledd ~

10-9)– Thermal electrons near BH

• Not perfect…– Collisionless plasma (mfp = 104 Rs)

– ElectronsUIUC CTA Seminar 9

Moscibrodzka et al (2009)

Page 10: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Ray Tracing

UIUC CTA Seminar 10

• Method for performing relativistic radiative transfer

• Fluid variables emission at infinity

• Calculate light rays assuming geodesics. (ω >> ωp, ωc)

• Observer “camera” constants of motion

• Trace backwards and integrate along portions of rays intersecting flow.

• IntensitiesImage, many frequenciesspectrum, many timeslight curve

Schnittman et al (2006)

Page 11: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Modeling

Dexter, Agol & Fragile (2009):

• Geodesics from public, analytic code geokerr (Dexter & Agol 2009)

• Time-dependent, relativistic radiative transfer

• 3D simulation from Fragile et al (2007)• Need 3D for accurate MRI, variability• a=0.9, doesn’t conserve energy!

• Fit images to 1.3mm (230 GHz) VLBI data over grid in Mtor, i, ξ, tobs

• Unpolarized; single temperature

UIUC CTA Seminar 11

Page 12: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

GRMHD Fits to VLBI Data

UIUC CTA Seminar 12

Dexter, Agol & Fragile (2009); Doeleman et al (2008)i=10 degrees i=70 degrees

10,000 km

100 μas

Page 13: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Light Curves

UIUC CTA Seminar 13

Page 14: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Comparison to Observed Flares

UIUC CTA Seminar 14

Eckart et al (2008)Marrone et al (2008)

Page 15: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Improved ModelingDexter et al (2010; submitted):• Sub-mm spectral index (Marrone 2006)• Add simulations from McKinney & Blandford (2009);

Fragile et al (2009)• Two-temperature models (parameter Ti/Te; Goldston

et al 2005, Moscibrodzka et al 2009)• Joint fits to spectral, VLBI data over grid in Mtor, i, a,

Ti/Te

• Angle-dependent emissivity (Leung et al 2010)

UIUC CTA Seminar 15

Page 16: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Improved Modeling

UIUC CTA Seminar 16

• Sample limited by existing 3D simulations

• Misleading p(a)– For low spin, need

hotter accretion flow

Page 17: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Parameter Estimates• i = 50 degrees

• Te /1010 K = 5.4±3.0

• ξ = -23 degrees

• dM/dt = 5 x 10-9 Msun yr-1

• All to 90% confidence

UIUC CTA Seminar 17

+35-15

+97-22

Inclination

Electron Temperature

Sky Orientation

Accretion Rate+15-2

Page 18: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Comparison to RIAF Values

UIUC CTA Seminar 18

Broderick et al (2009)

Inclination Sky Orientation

Page 19: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Face-on Fits

UIUC CTA Seminar 19

• Excellent fits to 1.3mm VLBI at all inclinations with 90h, Ti=Te (Dexter, Agol and Fragile 2009)

• Low inclinations now ruled out by: – Spectral index constraint (Moscibrodzka et al 2009)– Scarcity of VLBI fits in other models

Page 20: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Millimeter Flares• Models

reproduce observed flare duration, amplitude, frequency

• Stronger variability at higher frequency

UIUC CTA Seminar 20

Solid – 230 GHz Dotted – 690 GHz

Page 21: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Millimeter Flares

UIUC CTA Seminar 21

• Strong correlation with accretion rate variability

• Approximate emissivity:– Jν ~ nBα, α ≈ 1-2.

– Isothermal emission region, ν/νc ≈ 10.

– Not heating from magnetic reconnection

Page 22: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Finite Speed of Light

UIUC CTA Seminar 22

Toy emissivity, i=50 degrees 690 GHz, i=50 degrees

Page 23: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Finite Speed of Light

UIUC CTA Seminar 23

• Emission dominated by narrow range in observer time

• Time delays are 10-15% effect on light curves

Page 24: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Shadow of Sgr A*

UIUC CTA Seminar 24

Shadow may be detected on chile-lmt, smto-chile baselines; otherwise need south pole.

Page 25: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Crescents

UIUC CTA Seminar 25

Page 26: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Constraining Models

UIUC CTA Seminar 26

• Similar variance to Fish et al (2009)• Chile/Mexico are best bets for further constraining models• Simultaneous measurement of total flux at 345 GHz would

provide a significant constraint

Fish et al (2009) Dexter et al (2010)

230 GHz 345 GHz

Page 27: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Caveats

• Limited sample

• Constant Ti/Te

• Unpolarized millimeter emission

UIUC CTA Seminar 27

Page 28: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Conclusions

• Fit 3D GRMHD images/light curves of Sgr A* to mm observations

• Estimates of inclination, sky orientation agree with RIAF fits (Broderick et al 2009)

• Electron temperature well constrained• Consistent, but independent accretion rate constraint• Reproduce observed mm flares• LMT-Chile next best chance for observing shadow

• Future: polarized emission, tilted disks, M87.

UIUC CTA Seminar 28

Page 29: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

M87

UIUC CTA Seminar 29

New mass estimate BH angular size ~4/5 of Sgr A*! (Gebhardt & Thomas 2009)

Page 30: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Tilted Disks

UIUC CTA Seminar 30

Page 31: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Interferometry

UIUC CTA Seminar 31

Morales & Wythe (2009)

Page 32: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Log-Normal Ring Models

UIUC CTA Seminar 32

Page 33: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Event Horizon Telescope

UIUC CTA Seminar 33

UV coverage (Phase I: black)

From Shep Doeleman’s Decadal Survey Report on the EHT

Doeleman et al (2009)

Page 34: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Exciting Observations of Accreting Black Holes

• X-ray binaries– State transitions– QPOs– Iron lines

• AGN– QPO(?)– Microlensing– Multiwavelength

surveysUIUC CTA Seminar 34L / LEdd

SWIFT J1247

LMC X-3: 1983 – 2009

Steiner et al. 2010

Morgan et al (2010)

Fairall-9

Schmoll et al (2009)

Page 35: Connecting Simulations with Observations of the  Galactic Center Black Hole

Sagittarius A*

UIUC CTA Seminar 35

Dodds-Eden et al (2009)

Yuan et al (2003)