constitution and disease

1
1489 CONSTITUTION AND DISEASE regulated by the house-mother and all questions of their discipline and management are referred to her. As they learn to adjust themselves to life, they return into the general life of the Community. An analysis of 46 children who have passed through the Community is inserted in this year’s report ; the girls include a doctor, a nurse, a domestic servant, a shop assistant; the boys, a draughtsman, a waiter, a laboratory assistant. Only two boys are out of work ; of these alone unsatisfactory reports have been received. All these children have had a hard struggle for existence, and many are known to have shown courage and resourcefulness in the teeth of poverty and other difficulties. These qualities may well have been fostered by the success- ful efforts of the Community itself not only to survive but greatly to expand without adequate endowment. CONSTITUTION AND DISEASE IT is reasonable to suppose that, just as human beings differ innately in their physical and mental characteristics, they differ innately in their capacity for health and their resistance to disease. To the older writers this was a mere truism, but in the last half century, with the growth of pathology and bacteriology, the problem of the " diathesis " has been largely neglected, if not discredited, and until lately attention has been concentrated on the external agents of sickness. So far, however, bacteriology and immunology have not provided a solution of the problem of differences in reaction of persons exposed apparently to an equal risk of infection-why one escapes and one succumbs. If the more important factor is an acquired immunity these sciences may eventually provide a measure of this in each infection, but, on the other hand, it may be that " the summation of the morphological, physiological, immunological, and psychological characters with which an individual is born " largely determines his success- ful or unsuccessful reaction to his environment. Certainly of late years there has been a revival of interest in these inborn characteristics in relation to disease and a realisation that such constitutional factors may be of as much interest and as much importance as the maladies themselves and their causative agents. The quotation above is taken from a paper 1 describing an elaborate statistical study of this aspect of disease, undertaken by Dr. MATTHEW YouNG in the Institute of Anatomy, University College, London. His material consists of anthro- pometric measurements and observations of physical characters made by Dr. A. BONNARD (working under the Medical Research Council) on 1212 children between the ages of 6 and 12 years attending the Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond-street. Of these children, 368 were attending the special clinic for asthma, 459 the special clinic for rheumatism, and 385 the out-patients’ department for minor or trivial ailments but with no history of rheumatism or asthma or obvious impairment of general health. This last group serves as a control to the asthmatic 1 Jour. of Hyg., November, 1933, p. 435. and rheumatic. Some 30 anthropometric measure- ments were made of each child, and the hair and eye colour were noted, as well as the posture and bodily habitus. Distinguishing sex and three age-groups-namely, 6-8, 8-10, and 10--12 years- the comparisons between the three sets of children fall into three groups : (1) the absolute measure- ments, such as stature, length of arm and leg, girth, and diameters of the chest; (2) percentage ratios or indices which give expression to the shape or form or relative proportions of the different parts of the body, such as the ratio of stem length to standing height, cephalic, and facial indices ; and (3) the qualitative characters, such as colouring and posture. Consideration of the frequency distributions, the mean values and the variabilities of the absolute physical measurements leads to the conclusion that the contrasted groups of asthmatic and rheumatic children show no signifi- cant difference in their general dimensions, and that both groups in comparison with the control series also reveal no differences which are sufficiently consistent at the various ages and in the two sexes to be regarded as indicating a real divergence from the normal. Similarly with regard to the indices there is no definite evidence that the children suffering from the two diseases differ from each other or from the normal children in morphological type. On the other hand, certain significant differences are suggested by the figures relating to pigmentation. In distribution of hair colour the rheumatic children do not differ from the normal, but both the asthmatic boys and girls show a relatively greater excess of the blonde- haired type, and a greater deficiency of the dark haired, than might reasonably be expected to have arisen by chance. In eye colour, however, neither the asthmatic nor the rheumatic children can be said to differ from the normal, and the same equality is found in the distribution of grades of posture, the proportions of relatively long and slender and short and thick-set types, and in the form of face. The distinction between these types- slender or asthenic, thick-set or pyknic-is set out convincingly by Prof. RAYMOND PEARL in a recent study of the relation between constitution and health reviewed on p. 1485 of our present issue. He also comes to the conclusion that in the group of women studied bodily habitus was not signifi- cantly correlated with general health. Dr. YouNG’s own conclusions are set out thus : " The differences in the three groups of children, the asthmatic, the rheumatic, and the normal, in respect of the aggregate of physical characters brought under review are relatively so slight that they cannot be considered to support the view that asthmatic and rheumatic children really differ on the average from one another or from the general population of children from which they are drawn in bodily conformation or physical type, though they may possibly, indeed probably, differ in other constitutional traits." The verdict of not guilty does not detract from the value of an obviously very laborious and careful piece of work, and will not, it is to be hoped, discourage the collection of similar data concerning sufferers from other diseases.

Upload: dangduong

Post on 31-Dec-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CONSTITUTION AND DISEASE

1489CONSTITUTION AND DISEASE

regulated by the house-mother and all questionsof their discipline and management are referred toher. As they learn to adjust themselves to life,they return into the general life of the Community.An analysis of 46 children who have passed throughthe Community is inserted in this year’s report ;the girls include a doctor, a nurse, a domesticservant, a shop assistant; the boys, a draughtsman,a waiter, a laboratory assistant. Only two boysare out of work ; of these alone unsatisfactoryreports have been received. All these children havehad a hard struggle for existence, and many areknown to have shown courage and resourcefulnessin the teeth of poverty and other difficulties. These

qualities may well have been fostered by the success-ful efforts of the Community itself not only to survivebut greatly to expand without adequate endowment.

CONSTITUTION AND DISEASEIT is reasonable to suppose that, just as human

beings differ innately in their physical and mentalcharacteristics, they differ innately in their capacityfor health and their resistance to disease. To theolder writers this was a mere truism, but in thelast half century, with the growth of pathology andbacteriology, the problem of the " diathesis "has been largely neglected, if not discredited,and until lately attention has been concentratedon the external agents of sickness. So far,however, bacteriology and immunology have notprovided a solution of the problem of differencesin reaction of persons exposed apparently to anequal risk of infection-why one escapes and onesuccumbs. If the more important factor is an

acquired immunity these sciences may eventuallyprovide a measure of this in each infection, but,on the other hand, it may be that " the summationof the morphological, physiological, immunological,and psychological characters with which an

individual is born " largely determines his success-ful or unsuccessful reaction to his environment.

Certainly of late years there has been a revivalof interest in these inborn characteristics in relationto disease and a realisation that such constitutionalfactors may be of as much interest and as much

importance as the maladies themselves and theircausative agents.The quotation above is taken from a paper 1

describing an elaborate statistical study of this

aspect of disease, undertaken by Dr. MATTHEWYouNG in the Institute of Anatomy, UniversityCollege, London. His material consists of anthro-pometric measurements and observations of

physical characters made by Dr. A. BONNARD

(working under the Medical Research Council)on 1212 children between the ages of 6 and 12years attending the Hospital for Sick Children,Great Ormond-street. Of these children, 368were attending the special clinic for asthma,459 the special clinic for rheumatism, and 385the out-patients’ department for minor or trivialailments but with no history of rheumatism orasthma or obvious impairment of general health.This last group serves as a control to the asthmatic

1 Jour. of Hyg., November, 1933, p. 435.

and rheumatic. Some 30 anthropometric measure-ments were made of each child, and the hair andeye colour were noted, as well as the posture andbodily habitus. Distinguishing sex and three

age-groups-namely, 6-8, 8-10, and 10--12 years-the comparisons between the three sets of childrenfall into three groups : (1) the absolute measure-ments, such as stature, length of arm and leg,girth, and diameters of the chest; (2) percentageratios or indices which give expression to the

shape or form or relative proportions of the differentparts of the body, such as the ratio of stem lengthto standing height, cephalic, and facial indices ;and (3) the qualitative characters, such as colouringand posture. Consideration of the frequencydistributions, the mean values and the variabilitiesof the absolute physical measurements leads tothe conclusion that the contrasted groups ofasthmatic and rheumatic children show no signifi-cant difference in their general dimensions, andthat both groups in comparison with the controlseries also reveal no differences which are sufficientlyconsistent at the various ages and in the two sexesto be regarded as indicating a real divergencefrom the normal. Similarly with regard to theindices there is no definite evidence that thechildren suffering from the two diseases differfrom each other or from the normal children in

morphological type. On the other hand, certainsignificant differences are suggested by the figuresrelating to pigmentation. In distribution of haircolour the rheumatic children do not differ fromthe normal, but both the asthmatic boys andgirls show a relatively greater excess of the blonde-haired type, and a greater deficiency of the darkhaired, than might reasonably be expected to havearisen by chance. In eye colour, however, neitherthe asthmatic nor the rheumatic children can besaid to differ from the normal, and the sameequality is found in the distribution of grades ofposture, the proportions of relatively long andslender and short and thick-set types, and in theform of face. The distinction between these types-slender or asthenic, thick-set or pyknic-is set outconvincingly by Prof. RAYMOND PEARL in a recentstudy of the relation between constitution andhealth reviewed on p. 1485 of our present issue.He also comes to the conclusion that in the groupof women studied bodily habitus was not signifi-cantly correlated with general health. Dr. YouNG’sown conclusions are set out thus :

" The differences in the three groups of children,the asthmatic, the rheumatic, and the normal, inrespect of the aggregate of physical charactersbrought under review are relatively so slight thatthey cannot be considered to support the view thatasthmatic and rheumatic children really differ onthe average from one another or from the generalpopulation of children from which they are drawnin bodily conformation or physical type, thoughthey may possibly, indeed probably, differ in otherconstitutional traits."

The verdict of not guilty does not detract from thevalue of an obviously very laborious and carefulpiece of work, and will not, it is to be hoped,discourage the collection of similar data concerningsufferers from other diseases.