construction traffic management plan – pitt street north ...€¦ · sydney metro traffic team...

Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations

Project: Sydney Metro City & Southwest – TSE Works

Document No: SMCSWTSE‐JCG‐SPS‐TM‐PLN‐002285

DOCUMENT APPROVAL REVISION DATE PREPARED

BY REVIEWED BY

APPROVED BY

REMARKS

A 13 May 18 S Lewis . Internal review

B 23 May 18 S Lewis J Glasgow T Ferrero External review

C 19 June 18 S Lewis J Glasgow T Ferrero For approval

D 25 Sept 18 S Lewis B Saeheng J Glasgow Change to parking restriction on Pitt St – for approval

Signature:

E 29 June 20 D Mc Garry Update for completion date

�� !��"

�� #��$$$%�&'#$��!()�'*��%+�(��!(,�'*��!�-��.��)�!�-/��!�-0��$%!# 12(!�-,�13�4� �'�!�-3��5�6�4�+7�83��&&��+ ��) �� !&5" ��

��9:;:<=>�?@<<:AB@;C:;D: ��E:F:<:;D:�G@H �� I<@J:DK�LMK>:H �8*'�8��8�4��N��$�#�� OPQHR<MS�E:F�G@H �� T�� O=K:H ��N-8��U��V� E:AB@;A:�<:WXM<:C�YZH�[<@\H ]N!+��'��V��̂��!*#�!'*��!��(��_�+�#�̂ !��&�&��*�_�#��'̀`�L@H /�+-!'��+.!��8��̂��'�a�--!'*��,��--!��0̀�b��!�-��--!��̂��!*#�!'*��!��(��_�+�#�̂ !��&&��*�_�#��'̀ �̀b��!c��-�#��̂�8*'�8��*�'!��'��&&�+�̀�b��_!''8��!(��d��̂�8*'�8��*�'!��'��&&�+�̀�b��_��,��$'��̂�8*'�8��*�'!��'��&&�+�̀�b��-.!�7��c�-�#��̂�8*'�8��̀��?DH V)*N--!��7�!'��̂��'�a�--!'*��,��--!��0̀��eXYJ:DKH EfH�eQ?egLefhi?9heIehLQhIPGhjjkklmhf�IMKK�eK<::K�G@<Kn�eMK:�RB:<=KM@;A�h�LFGeg�oF@<\:<EQep�=BB<@q=>�?@;K<=DK�G@H � ��?>=AAMFMD=KM@;H/�+-!'U��!'*�&��!��8*'�8��-!''�'.�4��.�!(#�̂��4�̀��!_��_��$�*��N *!��*�� !��'#��_��%��!#�!*_�#�*��&��'*��#�(�'��&��_�#�*�#N)(�##��'%�V++��*�'.-8U�&��4��#�#!��#&��*��!*� ��r�� !��'#s�!#��! ��_�*��U�$��!--� ��_��N#�s��'*��'#��&�V ��_!-s�N ��#��_�#��'�#��--�)��'.�! -�+!)-�%��-.!� �t��!_��+� ��*�8�N��'��#�+��# �'*�'+��!#�8�N��!_��!c�'��_��&��(�,��'��*�'%��.!�*#U��'��OMADMB>M;:H��.�#��+#��!'!.�(�'� u<:=H P@D=KM@;H��vvvvv�wxyzy{|}�~��|z��vvvvv��?@;K<=DK@<�9:;:<=>�?@<<:AB@;C:;D: �


SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002285Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations Page 2 of 21

Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4

1.1. Project Overview ......................................................................................................... 4

1.2. Purpose of this Plan .................................................................................................... 4

2. Locality and existing conditions ............................................................................... 5

2.1. Castlereagh Street ...................................................................................................... 5

2.2. Park Street .................................................................................................................. 5

2.3. Pitt Street ..................................................................................................................... 6

3. Site Operations ............................................................................................................ 6

3.1. Works Required ........................................................................................................... 6

3.2. Operating Conditions ................................................................................................... 7

4. Fleet Management ....................................................................................................... 9

4.1. Haulage Routes ........................................................................................................... 9

4.2. Permits/ Over Dimensional Vehicles ......................................................................... 10

4.3. Drivers and Operators ............................................................................................... 10

5. Other Considerations ............................................................................................... 11

5.1. Road Safety Audits .................................................................................................... 11

5.2. Weekly Traffic Forecast ............................................................................................. 11

5.3. Police and Emergency Services ................................................................................ 11

5.4. Communications and the community ........................................................................ 11

5.5. Inspections and monitoring ....................................................................................... 12

5.6. Environmental Maintenance ...................................................................................... 13

5.7. Site Contacts ............................................................................................................. 13

Appendix 1 Parking restrictions ........................................................................................ 14

Appendix 2 Current and proposed site operations ......................................................... 15

Appendix 3 Traffic control plans ....................................................................................... 16

Appendix 4 Haulage routes ................................................................................................ 18

Appendix 5 EIS Excerpt ...................................................................................................... 19

Appendix 6 Road safety audit ............................................................................................ 20

Appendix 7 Review comments .......................................................................................... 21



Figures Figure 1: Sydney Metro Project ................................................................................................ 4

Figure 2: Pitt Street north site ................................................................................................... 5

Figure 3 EIS Haulage routes .................................................................................................. 10

Tables Table 1 Peak vehicle movements per hour .............................................................................. 7

Table 2 Proposed Communications ....................................................................................... 11

Table 3: Stakeholder consultation .......................................................................................... 12

Table 4: Site contacts ............................................................................................................. 13



1. Introduction

1.1. Project Overview

The Sydney Metro is Australia’s biggest public transport project. The metro project currently consists of:

Stage one is the Sydney Metro Northwest, formerly the North West Rail Link,connecting the north western suburbs of Sydney, through to Chatswood.

Stage two is the City & South West project linking Chatswood through to Sydenham. Stage three includes the upgrade of the existing rail line between Sydenham and

Bankstown.

Figure 1 shows the proposed Sydney Metro project and stages.

Figure 1: Sydney Metro Project

1.2. Purpose of this Plan

The purpose of this Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP): PITT STREET STATION NORTH SITE OPERATIONS is to detail the site operations and demobilisation for this phase of the Sydney Metro City & South West project. This plan will set out the traffic management initiatives that will be deployed to minimise disruption to and ensure the safety of the wide range of stakeholders potentially affected by the works, including but not limited to: motorists, pedestrians; cyclists; public transport users, local residents and property owners; business owners; and workers/staff engaged on the Project.



2. Locality and existing conditions

The Pitt Street Station north site is bounded by Pitt Street to the west, 250 Pitt Street / Castlereagh Boutique Hotel on Castlereagh Street to the north, Castlereagh Street to the east and Park Street to the south. The site is shown in Figure 2 below in red. The existing parking restrictions at the site are detailed below and are also included in Appendix 1.

Figure 2: Pitt Street north site

2.1. Castlereagh Street

Castlereagh Street is a local road which connects Hunter Street to Hay street in the Haymarket area. Castlereagh Street is one way southbound its entire length. A speed limit of 40km/hr is in place. With the closure of George Street for the light rail, Castlereagh Street is a major thoroughfare for buses to the inner west of Sydney.

No Stopping restrictions exist from Park Street for approximately 30m north of the intersection. North of this No Parking exists and continues further north to cover the Castlereagh Boutique Hotel frontage. This No Parking area is used by the Hotel for their guests, as noted in their EIS submissions.

The effective width of the footpath is 2.9m (property boundary to face of kerb is 3.7m with .8m allocated to street furniture. There are no cycling facilities on this section of Castlereagh Street. A bus lane exists on Castlereagh Street which can be used by cyclists.

Signalised pedestrian crossings exist on all legs at the intersection of Park Street.

Castlereagh Street is located within the CBD Tow away zone.

2.2. Park Street

Park Street is an unclassified regional road and is primarily under the control of local council. Park Street commences at George Street to the west and ceases at College Street. To the



west of George Street, Park Street is renamed Druitt Street and to the east of College Street, the street is renamed William Street. The speed limit on Park Street is 40km/hr due to the high pedestrian activity. Park Street is buses only between George Street and Pitt Street in the eastbound direction only.

A bus stop is located on Park Street between Pitt and Castlereagh streets, on the eastbound carriageway along the frontage of the site. This bus stop services the following routes: 311, 324 and 325. The first bus at this stop is 5.45AM with the last service being at 1:25AM except for Friday night/ Saturday morning with an extra service at 2:25AM.

To the east of the bus stop, near the intersection of Castlereagh Street an unmetered loading zone is in operation between 6AM-6PM M-F, with No Parking restrictions outside of these hours.

To the east of the loading zone, a No Stopping Australia Post Vehicles excepted is installed covering approximately 6m. From this zone to the intersection of Castlereagh Street is No Stopping restrictions.

The existing footpaths are approximately 4m wide. There are no cycling facilities on this section of Park Street, however, by regulations, the existing Bus Lane can be used by cyclists. Signalised pedestrian crossings exist on all legs at the intersections of Pitt Street and Castlereagh Street.

2.3. Pitt Street

Pitt Street is classified as a local road. It commences at Central Station to the south and ends at Circular Quay. The section of Pitt Street between Park and Market streets is one way northbound. The speed limit on Pitt Street is 40km/hr due to high pedestrian activity in this area.

No bus stops or routes exist on this section of Pitt Street.

No Stopping 7AM-6PM M-F and 7AM-1PM Sat with the spaces reverting to 4P parking (6PM-10PM M-F, 1PM-10PM SAT, 8AM-10PM SUN &PH).

There is no on road cycling facility. The footpaths are typically 3m which widen out at intersections. Signalised pedestrian crossings exist on all legs at its intersection with Park Street.

3. Site Operations

Duration: 25 months Timing: July 2018 to December 2020

3.1. Works Required

Works to be completed internally during this phase is the excavation of the station box, pedestrian adits and the subsequent demobilisation. Works will be required at the end of excavation to decommission driveways, where not required for the follow-on contractors and removal of infrastructure, such as acoustic shed and water treatment plant

External works will see changes to the existing hoarding to facilitate capping beam works within the site. This work will involve the installation of Class A hoarding in lieu of the Class B hoarding, as described in the Pitt Street North Site Establishment CTMP (SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002284). At the completion of tunnelling works and prior to the site footprint being excavated, the hoarding along Pitt Street will be revised to Class B hoarding. This change to hoarding will occur at night with pedestrian diversions in place.



Access and egress for all spoil operations are proposed from Castlereagh Street. This access/ egress arrangement will utilise the previously approved access/ egress points. The current parking restrictions will be retained along the site frontages. A light vehicle access/ egress and heavy vehicle access will be located on Pitt Street, refer to Appendix 2.

Excavation works will occur 24/7.

Works include:

Removal of excavated and other material from site Capping beam works including adjustments/ removal/ replacement of hoarding Concreting works Site hoarding removal Equipment installation Demobilisation of site

3.2. Operating Conditions

The main access/ egress is proposed on Castlereagh Street using existing driveways, that previously serviced the demolition works in Stage 1 CTMP for DELTA and the site establishment works undertaken as part of CTMP SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002284. The use of the Pitt Street driveway will be for heavy and light vehicle access once the bridging structure is in place (refer to Site Establishment CTMP) The use of the Pitt Street egress will be for light vehicles only. There will be approximately 7,500 trucks per month, during peak periods with 250 trucks per day. This peak period will last for approximately 5 months from early 2019. Outside of that peak period, truck numbers average 60 trucks per day. There will be minimal truck numbers during the peak periods (AM and PM).

Table 1 provides a comparison of the EIS and TSE peak traffic at the site.

Table 1 Peak vehicle movements per hour

TIME EIS LIGHT VEHICLES

TSE LIGHT VEHICLES

EIS HEAVY VEHICLES

TSE HEAVY VEHICLES

0700-1000 2-10 2-10 6 6

1000-1200 10 10 24 24

1200-1400 10 10 24 24

1400-1600 10 10 6-24 24

1600-1800 2 2 6 6

1800-0700 2 2 6 6

3.2.1. Impact on Traffic Flows

The operation of the site will have an impact on the surrounding street system, however, it is recognised that the traffic generation is well below the EIS numbers. Heavy vehicles will be restricted to right in/ right out on Castlereagh Street and right in only on Pitt Street. Deliveries will be undertaken outside of peak hours, where the delivery vehicle is unable to enter site via the nominated vehicular crossing, refer to Section 3.2.

As noted in the EIS Road Network Performance, “shows that the intersection performance is maintained at all intersections during the construction phase of the project except for the Bathurst Street/ Day Street intersection”, with a deterioration in the LoS from C to D, refer to Appendix 5.



3.2.2. Impact on Public Transport

There is no long-term impact on public transport as there no changes proposed to the Park Street area. Lane closures will be required on Park Street during acoustic shed removal. This will require the closure of the bus stop on the eastbound carriageway between Pitt and Castlereagh streets. In previous closures the bus stop has been relocated to the bus stop that currently exists between Pitt and George streets. These works will be undertaken at night.

3.2.3. Impact on Pedestrians and Cyclists

During the hoarding works and the acoustic shed removal, pedestrians will be diverted from the affected footpaths during weekends or at night. Access and egress of vehicles will require pedestrian management at the driveways as per Appendix 3.

Delivery of oversize and over mass vehicles will require the diversion of pedestrians from the Castlereagh Street frontage at night.

3.2.4. Impacts on commercial and residential access

There is no impact on existing commercial or residential property access arrangements.

3.2.5. Staff parking and transportation to site

During the site operations and demobilisation period, it is anticipated that there will be 30-75 personnel on site. There will be some car parking spaces on site, however, the workforce will be encouraged to arrive by site using public transport, with most likely to use the Town Hall Interchange, a 4-minute walk (280m) from site.

3.2.6. Cumulative impacts

There are numerous development applications either approved or on exhibition surrounding the site. The DAs tend to be either minor refurbishments or changes to hours of operation. It is not anticipated that the construction site will impact on current DA or visa versa.

The Sydney Light Rail works are occurring on George Street between Circular Quay and Central. Where works are required to impact on traffic and pedestrian thoroughfares, contact will be made with the constructor to ascertain any conflicts. It should be noted that the Sydney Light Rail is due to be operational by 2020 and that George Street will again be open to vehicle traffic from south of Bathurst Street. It is also noted that works will commence in 2018 on the Cloud Arch at the corner of George and Park streets.

3.2.7. Special Events

There are numerous special events held within the Sydney CBD. In reviewing the City of Sydney’s website, the majority of events are held within the Town Hall or other buildings. However, it is recognised that Class 1 and 2 events, as noted in the TMC’s publication (Special Events Guide 2006) do occur within the city centre. JHCPBG JV will work with the various stakeholders in planning their works.

Events that are adjacent or directly impact the work site directly are typically held on a Sunday. These include the Sydney Running Festival events and City to Surf held in Spring. It is understood the Vivid Festival had a lighting installation in ‘the galleries’ opposite the site on Pitt Street.



3.2.8. Traffic Control Plan (TCP) / Road Occupancy License (ROL) Identified Works

Works that have been identified as requiring a Traffic Control Plan are detailed below. Appendix 3 provides details on timing for implementation, the works being undertaken and the expected traffic impacts.

1. Pedestrian management during access/ egress

2. Footpath/ lane closures

3.2.9. City of Sydney Council required approvals

Works that have been identified as requiring Council approval include:

1. Oversize and over mass vehicle movements

2. Hoarding installation/ replacement

3. Change to parking restriction on Pitt Street from time limited No Stopping to full time NoStopping

3.2.10. Roads and Maritime required approvals

Works that have been identified as requiring specific RMS approval include:

1. Oversize and over mass vehicle movements

4. Fleet Management

Trucks to be used on the project will be compliant with NSW legislation and standards including the Heavy Vehicle National Legislation. All heavy vehicle operations will be conducted in accordance with the Chain of Responsibility (CoR) Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-HS-PLN-002164).

A combination of truck types will be used during the site operation works. These trucks may be single unit, semi-trailers, bin trucks and 5t tippers.

4.1. Haulage Routes

Generally, the haulage routes will be via arterial roads/ freeway or Tollway. Where possible the routes have taken into account the requirements of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). It is noted that the EIS for this site access shows access via Pitt Street and Castlereagh Street with egress onto Castlereagh Street, refer to Figure 3 below. It is further noted that the Ministerial Conditions of Approval and the Construction Traffic Management Framework identify the approval pathway for changes to the EIS nominated haulage routes. It is noted that the haulage routes are based on previously approved routes for the demolition and site establishment works.

Material will be removed and delivered to site using a combination of vehicles. These trucks will range in size from 5.5m to 19.0m. Semi-trailer deliveries will occur out of hours. Refer to Appendix 4 for details on the proposed routes.



Figure 3 EIS Haulage routes

4.2. Permits/ Over Dimensional Vehicles

Permit issue for vehicles greater than 45.5 tonnes is through the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR). This applies to particular special purpose vehicles (SPV) such as mobile cranes and other oversize/over mass vehicles (OSOM). At present, RMS is currently undertaking this permit issue for State roads and Council for local/ regional roads.

For over dimensional vehicles, generally vehicles that are greater than 25m length or 3.5m width require a pilot(s). Extremely long or wide vehicles will require an escort (fee payable). Permits will be applied for by the transport operator.

Oversize vehicles will be required at this site for removal of:

Water treatment plant Large plant such as excavators, road headers etc

Oversize vehicles will be required at this site for delivery of:

Arch lining formwork systems

These removals/ deliveries will occur outside of peak hours.

4.3. Drivers and Operators

Operator selection will be based on safety performance criteria. Operators and drivers will be required to have general construction industry induction cards and will be required to attend ongoing general project and site-specific inductions.

All operators will be comprehensively trained with regard to community expectations and impacts from haulage operations. The induction will have a particular focus on operator behaviour. Operator competency and standards of behaviour will be continually assessed, and discipline procedures will be put in place to maintain compliance.



Queuing of trucks in local streets around the sites will not occur as there will be sufficient designated area within site for trucks to wait and the truck marshalling facility at White Bay is in operation, refer to SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-TM-PLN-002299. Trucks will arrive post the site start times.

5. Other Considerations

5.1. Road Safety Audits

Road safety audits will be undertaken during the development of the CTMP and upon implementation of the long-term work site. Refer to Appendix 6 for the audit report.

5.2. Weekly Traffic Forecast

A weekly traffic forecast is provided to local councils, RMS, Emergency Services, TfNSW, SCO and other stakeholders as requested. This forecast details the up and coming works and details of timings including hours of the day and dates of works that will impact traffic- road, public transport, pedestrians and cyclist.

5.3. Police and Emergency Services

The Police and relevant Emergency Services will be informed in a timely manner of relevant activities proposed within this CTMP. The initial communication to these stakeholders will be via the Traffic and Transport Liaison Group (TTLG). Regular updates will be provided to emergency services, including changes to road network configurations, changes to road conditions and worksite access locations, through emails and face to face discussions.

5.4. Communications and the community

The TSE will be responsible for the dissemination of information to the community including affected residents, relevant Councils, businesses and the public. Refer to Sydney Metro Community Consultation Strategy – Early Works.

Any enquiries, complaints and/ or compliments are to be directed to the TfNSW’s Sydney Metro Project Information line - 1800 171 386 or via email to: [email protected] or Sydney Metro City & Southwest, PO Box K659, Haymarket, NSW 1240 or Sydney Metro City & Southwest Website.

Table 2 provides the proposed communications to be implemented for this CTMP

Table 2 Proposed Communications

NOTIFICATION APPLICABLE

Community notice YES

Precinct update/ e-update YES

Email YES

Internet YES

On site briefings YES

Print advertising YES – Quarterly newsletter only

Advance warning signs YES



5.4.1. Travelling public

Where our works will impact on the travelling public we will undertake the following, where identified on the plans:

Public transport interruptions will be communicated via on site signage Motoring public will be forewarned of any changes, including road closures, road changes

and lane closures well in advance using appropriate signage, including variable messagesigns (VMS), where identified on the plans.

Pedestrians and cyclists will be provided with advance warning signs, as detailed on theTCP

5.4.2. Stakeholders consulted

Table 3 identifies the stakeholders consulted during the development of this CTMP:

Table 3: Stakeholder consultation

STAKEHOLDER DATE CONSULTATION MAIN CONTACT PEOPLE

TCG 22 May 18 Meeting RMS/ Councils/ SCO/ TfNSW

City of Sydney 23 May 18 Submission of CTMP Tony Ly/ Van Le

RMS 23 May 18 Submission of CTMP Carl Mella

TfNSW 23 May 18 Submission of CTMP Berin Gordon

SCO 23 May 18 Submission of CTMP Giovanny Ramirez/ Aaron Gale/ Justine Bryant

Centre for Road Safety 23 May 18 Submission of CTMP Luke Wilby

City of Sydney 19 June 18 Resubmission of CTMP Tony Ly/ Van Le/ Asad Rajbhoy

RMS 19 June 18 Resubmission of CTMP Carl Mella

TfNSW 19 June 18 Resubmission of CTMP Berin Gordon

SCO 19 June 18 Resubmission of CTMP Giovanny Ramirez/ Aaron Gale/ Justine Bryant

City of Sydney 25 Sept 18 Resubmission of CTMP Tony Ly/ Van Le/ Asad Rajbhoy

RMS 25 Sept 18 Resubmission of CTMP Carl Mella

TfNSW 25 Sept 18 Resubmission of CTMP Berin Gordon

SCO 25 Sept 18 Resubmission of CTMP Giovanny Ramirez/ Jake Cole

5.5. Inspections and monitoring

The site will be monitored by the site supervisor. Any changes as noted in this CTMP, to signs/ lines that impact on the public will be monitored daily during site operating hours.

Traffic control used for pedestrian management, lane closures etc. will need to provide records of the traffic control implemented. Any changes required to the traffic control set up will be authorised by a holder of an RMS “Prepare a Work Zone Traffic Management Plan” or equivalent.

All 29 June 20 CTMP update for end dates All



5.6. Environmental Maintenance

All works will be undertaken in accordance with the TSE Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-002010) and associated sub plans including the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (SMCSTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-002012). The TSE Works are also regulated by the NSW Environment Protection Authority and works to be undertaken outside of standard construction hours will need to comply with the requirements of the Environment Protection License.

5.7. Site Contacts

Table 4: Site contacts

NAME POSITION CONTACT #

Bobby Saeheng Project Manager

Tony Macpherson Superintendent

Sydney Metro Traffic Team phone

5.8. References

The following documents were used in the development of this CTMP:

Construction Traffic Management Framework – Version 2.5 provided 22/ 12/17 Principal’s General Specification G10 Traffic and Transport Management, v2.0 Roads and Maritime Service Traffic Control at Worksites Manual v 4.0 Relevant AustRoads Guides and RMS Supplements Sydney Metro Principal Contractor Health and Safety Standard SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002284 Pitt Street North Site Establishment Sydney Metro City and Southwest Environmental Impact Statement, May 2016 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-TM-PLN-002299 White Bay Truck Marshalling Facility DD-SYDM-TMP-0007-C-01 Pitt St Demolition Site Stage 2



Appendix 1 Parking restrictions

DRAWING NUMBER DESCRIPTION

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521802- A Existing parking restrictions

/

/

BINBBBBBBN

B INBBB

B INB INBB IN

B INN

B INBIN

BINBIN

BBBBBBN

BIBN

BBBB

BIB IN

B IN

PITT ST

PARK

ST

CASTLEREAGH ST

PITT ST

PARK

ST

CASTLEREAGH STR2-6(L)

PG7-3-1(R)

R5-400(LR)R5-400(L)

R5-23(R)

R5-39

OT

HE

RT

IME

S

R5-20(L) R5-23(R)

R5-20(LR) EXISTING BUS STOPID:2000426

OT

HE

RT

IME

S

R5-23(L)R5-400(R)

R5-39

R5-402(L)

R6-235-8

R2-6(L)

R2-6(R)

SPS-LW-RS-054

SPS-LW-RS-056

4PMETER

MOUNTED ON STREETLIGHTING POLE

R5-402(R)

MOUNTED ONSIGNAL POST

SPS-LW-RS-052

SPS-LW-RS-053


SPS-LW-RS-050

SPS-

LW-R

S-05

1

NO STOPPING

SPS-LW-RS-055SPS-LW-RS-057

4PMETER

HOCHTIEF

SERVICEPROVIDERS

DRAWING COLOUR CODED - PRINT ALL COPIES IN COLOUR

CAMD DESCRIPTION DESIGNERSIGN./DATE

VERIFIEDSIGN./DATE

APPROVEDSIGN./DATE

SCALES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

DF 801*554

Plot

Dat

e &

Tim

eFi

le P

lotte

d

CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE:DRG No.STATUS:FILE No.

DRAWN

DESIGNED

DRG CHECK

DESIGN CHECK

APPROVED

OFSHEET:

EDMS No.

This drawing and the related information have been prepared by, or at the request of, Transport for NSW for a specificpurpose and may not be used for any purpose other than the purpose intended by Transport for NSW.Transport for NSW does not provide any warranties and accepts no liability arising out of the use of this drawing or anyof the related information for any purpose other than the intended purpose. This drawing is protected by copyrightand no part of this drawing may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Transport for NSW.

CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE: Plot

ted

by1/

15/2

018

4:05

PM

DAVI

D.TH

OMSO

N

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCLIENT

IC CERTIFIED - IC CERTIFICATE

REVISION

IN PROGRESSCHECK PRINT

INITIAL DATE

PRELIM. FINAL

ENGINEER CHECK

DRAFTING CHECK

BACKDRAFTED/CORRECTED

CONFIRMED/VERIFIED

0

SCALE 1:250 AT A1 SIZE

7.52.5 5.0 10 12.5 15mSYDNEY METRO CITY & SOUTHWESTPITT STREET STATION AND PRECINCTLOCAL AREA WORKSSIGNAGE AND LINEMARKING PLANSHEET 2

SUBSTANTIAL DETAILED DESIGN11 26

1:250 10.11.17D. ROBERTSON

10.11.17D. THOMSON

10.11.17N. TANG

10.11.17J. MACADANGDANG

10.11.17K. KIM

MGA AHD

A ISSUED FOR SDD NT/10.11.17 DT/10.11.17 DR/10.11.17 A1

ASMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521802

C:\S

MCS

W-T

SE-E

xpor

t\

PM

KEY PLANNOT TO SCALE

PITT STREET

PARKSTREET

BATHURSTSTREET

CASTLEREAGH STREET

SHEET 1SHEET 2

R5-400(L)

LEGENDGENERAL

TSE PROJECT SITE AS PER TSEPROJECT DEED SCHEDULE D1

TSE AREAS AS PER TSEPROJECT DEED SCHEDULE D1

CADASTRAL BOUNDARY

PROPOSED SIGN FACE

EXISTING SIGN FACETO BE RETAINED

EXISTING SIGN FACE TO BEREMOVED OR COVERED

PROPOSED POSTMOUNTED SIGN FACE

EXISTING POSTMOUNTED SIGN FACE

R5-400(L)

R5-400(L)

NOTES1. FOR GENERAL NOTES REFER TO DRAWING No. 521004.2. FOR GENERAL LEGEND REFER TO DRAWING No. 521006.3. FOR SIGNAGE SCHEDULE REFER TO DRAWING No. 521811.

EXISTING WALL/POLEMOUNTED SIGN FACE

PROPOSED WALL/POLEMOUNTED SIGN FACE

C1 LINEMARKING TAG

LOCAL WORKS CONTROL LINE



Appendix 2 Current and proposed site operations


SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521512 Current and proposed access/ egress arrangements

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521902 Swept path

JCG-SPS-TM-DRG-002284-0058 10 Wheeler Access

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521802- 2 Proposed parking restrictions

PM 1

3

13

1

112

22

1

1

17 100

Single Unit Truck/Bus (12.5 m)

SERVICEPROVIDERS



VERIFIEDSIGN./DATE

APPROVEDSIGN./DATE

SCALES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

DF 801*554

Plot

Dat

e &

Tim

eFi

le P

lotte

d


DRAWN

DESIGNED

DRG CHECK

DESIGN CHECK

APPROVED

OFSHEET:

EDMS No.



ted

by6/

18/2

018

9:58

AM

PTUL

LY1

CLIENT

SL/18.06.18ISSUED FOR INTERNAL REVIEW 18.06.18 SL/18.06.18A1

18.06.18SUE LEWIS

18.06.18SUE LEWIS

18.06.18SUE LEWIS

18.06.18SUE LEWIS

18.06.18PHIL TULLY

-

-1

A1JCG-SPS-TM-DRG-002284-0058

1 TRUCK-10m SWEPT PATH PITT STREET NORTH ACCESSTRAFFIC MANAGEMENTPITT STREET STATION AND PRECINCTSYDNEY METRO CITY & SOUTHWEST0 2.5 10 12.5m7.55

SCALE 1:250 (A1)SCALE 1:500 (A3)

AutoCAD SHX Text

PITT STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

CASTLEREAGH STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

PARK STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

10 Wheeler

AutoCAD SHX Text

Custom

AutoCAD SHX Text

(c) 2018 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.

AutoCAD SHX Text

10 Wheeler

AutoCAD SHX Text

Custom

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

10 Wheeler

AutoCAD SHX Text

Custom

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

10 Wheeler

AutoCAD SHX Text

Custom

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

HOCHTIEF

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENGINEERING

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D)

G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D)

G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D)G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D)

G (D)

W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D) W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D) W (D) W (D)

W (D)W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)W

(D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)W (D)

W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D)

W (D) W (D) W (D)

W (D)W (D)

W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D)

W (D)

S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D)

S (D)

S (D)

S (D)S (D)

S (D)S (D)

S (D)

TCSTCS

TCSTCS

TCSTCS

TCSTCS

TCS

TCSTCS

TCSTCS

TCS

TCS

TCS

TCS

TCSTCSTCSTCS

TCS

TCS

TCS TCS

TCS

TCS

G (D)

W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D)

OF (D)

OF (D)

OF (D)

OF (D)

OF (D)

OF (D)

OF (D)

OF (D)

OF (D)OF (D)

OF (D)

OF (D)

T (D)

T (D) T (D)OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)

OF (D)

OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)

OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)

OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)OF (D)OF (D)

OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)OF (D) OF (D)

OF (D)OF (D)

OF (D) OF (D)

OF (D)OF (D)

OF (D)OF (D)

OF (D)OF (D)

OF (D)OF (D)

OF (D)OF (D)

OF (D)OF (D)

OF (D)OF (D)

OF (D)OF (D)

OF (D)

OF (D)

OF (D

)

OF (D) OF (D)

OF (D)

OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D) HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D) HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D) HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)

HV (D

)

HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D) HV (D)

HV (D

)HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D

)

HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)

HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D) HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D) HV (D)HV

(D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)


HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D) HV (D)HV (D

)HV

(D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

HV (D)

S (D)

OF (D) OF (D)OF (D)

OF (D)

OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D) OF (D)

W (D) W (D)

W (D) W (D)

S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D)

S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D) S (D)

G (D)

G (D)

G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D) G (D)

W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D) W (D)

X X

XX

X X

X X

X X

XX

XX

XX

X

XX

X X

X X

X

X X

G (D)G (D)G (D)

SLH

SLH


BIN

BIN

BIN

BINBIN

BINBIN

PITT ST

PARK

ST

CASTLEREAGH ST

PITT ST

PARK

ST

CASTLEREAGH ST

EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE RETAINED ASCONSTRUCTION SITE EGRESS DRIVEWAY

EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BERETAINED AS AUXILIARY SITEACCESS / EGRESS DRIVEWAY

EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE RETAINED ASCONSTRUCTION SITE ACCESS DRIVEWAY

RETAIN CITY OF SYDNEYSTORMWATER GULLY PIT

HOCHTIEFENGINEERING

SERVICEPROVIDERS



VERIFIEDSIGN./DATE

APPROVEDSIGN./DATE

SCALES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

DF 801*554

Plot

Dat

e &

Tim

eFi

le P

lotte

d


DRAWN

DESIGNED

DRG CHECK

DESIGN CHECK

APPROVED

OFSHEET:

EDMS No.



ted

by1/

15/2

018

4:37

PM

NATH

AN.T

ANG

CLIENTIC CERTIFIED - IC CERTIFICATE

REVISION

IN PROGRESSCHECK PRINT

INITIAL DATE

PRELIM. FINAL

ENGINEER CHECK

DRAFTING CHECK


CONFIRMED/VERIFIED

0


7.52.5 5.0 10 12.5 15mSYDNEY METRO CITY & SOUTHWESTPITT STREET STATION AND PRECINCTLOCAL AREA WORKSGENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLANSHEET 2

STAGE 3 DESIGN REVIEW - WIP0 0

1:250 ------

------

------

------

------

MGA AHD

A ISSUED FOR DCD NT/21/08/17 DR/21/08/17 KL/21/08/17

B ISSUED FOR SDD NT/13/11/17 DR/13/11/17 KL/13/11/17

C.1 --- --- ---

A1

C.1SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521512

LEGENDGENERAL

CADASTRAL BOUNDARY


STATION MCOTSE AREAS AS PER TSEPROJECT DEED SCHEDULE D1

DRIVEWAY AND LAYBACK

TSW

GSW

E

EXISTING UTILITIES. FORDETAILS AND PROPOSEDRELOCATIONS REFER TOUTILITY COORDINATIONDRAWINGS

< T <

AXUHVU

OF

LVU< SL <

EXISTING STORMWATER

PITT STREET STATION PRECINCTCIVIL WORKS (STATIONS &SURROUNDS). REFER TO DESIGNLOT DP-S-170 FOR DETAILS

PITT STREET STATION ANDPRECINCT OPEN BOX EXCAVATION,SHORING AND SUPPORT ANDBRIDGE STRUCTURE REFER TODESIGN LOT DP-S-150

NOTES1. FOR GENERAL NOTES REFER TO DRAWING No. 521004.2. FOR GENERAL LEGEND REFER TO DRAWING No. 521006.

EXISTING DRIVEWAY ANDLAYBACK TO BE RETAINED

ADJO

INS

SMCS

WTS

E-JA

B-SP

S-LW

-DRG

-521511

PM


PITT STREET

SHEET 1 SHEET 2

PARKSTREET

BATHURSTSTREET

CASTLEREAGH STREET

/

/

BIN

BIN

BIN

BINBIN

BINBIN

PITT ST

PARK

ST

CASTLEREAGH ST

Passenger vehicle (5.2 m)

Passenger vehicle (5.2 m)

PITT ST

PARK

ST

CASTLEREAGH ST

HOCHTIEF

ENGINEERING

SERVICEPROVIDERS



VERIFIEDSIGN./DATE

APPROVEDSIGN./DATE

SCALES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

DF 801*554

Plot

Dat

e &

Tim

eFi

le P

lotte

d


DRAWN

DESIGNED

DRG CHECK

DESIGN CHECK

APPROVED

OFSHEET:

EDMS No.



ted

by4/

5/20

18 2

:09

PMDA

VID.

THOM

SON


FOR CONSTRUCTION

0


7.52.5 5.0 10 12.5 15mSYDNEY METRO CITY & SOUTHWESTPITT STREET STATION AND PRECINCTLOCAL AREA WORKSSWEPT PATH PLANSHEET 2

FOR CONSTRUCTION17 27

1:250 05.04.18D. ROBERTSON

05.04.18L. AVUK

05.04.18N. TANG

05.04.18D. THOMSON

05.04.18K. KIM

MGA AHD

00 ASSURED FOR CONSTRUCTION TM/05.04.18 DT/05.04.18 DR/05.04.18 A1

00SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521902

C:\S

MCS

W-T

SE-E

xpor

t\

SMCSWTSE-IC-CER-B2-043

GENERAL

DRIVEWAY AND LAYBACK



CADASTRAL BOUNDARY

PITT STREET STATION PRECINCTCIVIL WORKS (STATION &SURROUNDS) REFER TO DESIGNLOT DP-S-170 FOR DETAILS

CAR(AUSTROADS, 2013)

SERVICE VEHICLE (8.8m)(AUSTROADS, 2013)

EXISTING DRIVEWAY ANDLAYBACK TO BE RETAINED

CONCRETE AGI

PM


PITT STREET

PARKSTREET

BATHURSTSTREET

CASTLEREAGH STREET

SHEET 1SHEET 2

AutoCAD SHX Text

CL112 Agi

AutoCAD SHX Text

Service Vehicle (8.8 m)

/

/

BIN

BIN

BIN

BINBIN

BINBIN

PITT ST

PARK

ST

CASTLEREAGH ST

PITT ST

PARK

ST

CASTLEREAGH STR2-6(L)

PG7-3-1(R)

R5-400(LR)R5-400(L)

R5-23(R)

R5-39

OT

HE

R

TIM

ES

R5-20(L) R5-23(R)

R5-20(LR) EXISTING BUS STOPID:2000426

OT

HE

R

TIM

ES

R5-23(L)R5-400(R)

R5-39

R5-402(L)

R6-235-8

R2-6(L)

R2-6(R)

SPS-LW-RS-054

SPS-LW-RS-056

4P-10AM

METER

7AM

MOUNTED ON STREETLIGHTING POLE

R5-402(R)


SPS-LW-RS-052

SPS-LW-RS-053


SPS-LW-RS-050

NO STOPPING

SPS-LW-RS-055SPS-LW-RS-057

4P-10AM

METER

7AM

R5-400(R)R5-400(R)

HOCHTIEFENGINEERING

SERVICEPROVIDERS



VERIFIEDSIGN./DATE

APPROVEDSIGN./DATE

SCALES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

DF 801*554

Plot

Dat

e &

Tim

eFi

le P

lotte

d


DRAWN

DESIGNED

DRG CHECK

DESIGN CHECK

APPROVED

OFSHEET:

EDMS No.



ted

by9/

19/2

018

10:2

4 AM

MZA

Z142

0


R

E

V

IS

IO

N

IN

P

R

O

G

R

E

S

S

CHECK PRINTINITIAL DATE

PRELIM. FINAL

ENGINEER CHECK

DRAFTING CHECK


CONFIRMED/VERIFIED

FOR CONSTRUCTION

0


7.52.5 5.0 10 12.5 15mSYDNEY METRO CITY & SOUTHWESTPITT STREET STATION AND PRECINCTLOCAL AREA WORKSSIGNAGE AND LINEMARKING PLANSHEET 2

FOR CONSTRUCTION11 27

1:250 18.09.18D. ROBERTSON

18.09.18E. ESTORES JR.

18.09.18C. ALBESA

18.09.18F. BATHAN

18.09.18T. THEIVENDRAN

MGA AHD

00 ASSURED FOR CONSTRUCTION TM/05.04.18 DT/05.04.18 DR/05.04.18

01 SIGNS REMOVED CA/27.08.18 DT/27.08.18 DR/27.08.18

02 NO STOPPING SIGNS REPLACED CA/18.09.18 DT/18.09.18 DR/18.09.18

A1

02SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521802

C:\S

MCS

W-T

SE-E

xpor

t\

SMCSWTSE-IC-CER-B2-043

PM


PITT STREET

PARKSTREET

BATHURSTSTREET

CASTLEREAGH STREET

SHEET 1SHEET 2

R5-400(L)

LEGENDGENERAL



CADASTRAL BOUNDARY

PROPOSED SIGN FACE

EXISTING SIGN FACETO BE RETAINED

EXISTING SIGN FACE TO BEREMOVED OR COVERED

PROPOSED POSTMOUNTED SIGN FACE

EXISTING POSTMOUNTED SIGN FACE

R5-400(L)

R5-400(L)

NOTES1. FOR GENERAL NOTES REFER TO DRAWING No. 521004.2. FOR GENERAL LEGEND REFER TO DRAWING No. 521006.3. FOR SIGNAGE SCHEDULE REFER TO DRAWING No. 521811.

EXISTING WALL/POLEMOUNTED SIGN FACE

PROPOSED WALL/POLEMOUNTED SIGN FACE

C1 LINEMARKING TAG

LOCAL WORKS CONTROL LINE

0202



Appendix 3 Traffic control plans

TCP # LOCATION FROM TO TIMING TRAFFIC CONTROL WORKS IMPACTS

TCP-SPS-PAR-PITT-PEDMGT-NBSB-000002

Park Street Castlereagh Street

Pitt Street

Nights/ weekends

Pedestrian diversion to southern footpath

Delivery/removal of plant

Acoustic shed removal

Hoarding works

Minimal impacts to pedestrians as diversion undertaken at night/ weekends

Bus stop closed

TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401

Castlereagh Street

Park Street North of site

Nights/ weekends

Pedestrian diversion onto eastern footpath



Driveway decommissioning

Hoarding works


TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-1401

Castlereagh Street


Nights Lane closure adjacent to site




Hoarding works

Minimal impacts to traffic as traffic control undertaken at night

TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-0302


Pitt Street

Nights/ weekends

Pedestrian diversion to southern footpath



Hoarding works


Bus stop open

TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301


Pitt Street

Nights Lane closure adjacent to site



Hoarding works

Works to be undertaken at night – bus stop open

TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-0202

Pitt Street Park Street North of site

Nights Pedestrian diversion to western footpath




Hoarding works

Minimal impacts to pedestrians as diversion undertaken at night/ weekend



TCP # LOCATION FROM TO TIMING TRAFFIC CONTROL WORKS IMPACTS

TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-1201

Pitt Street Park Street North of site

Nights Parking and lane closure adjacent to site




Hoarding works


TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-2401

Castlereagh Street


Nights Double lane closure adjacent to site




Hoarding works


NOT TO SCALE

N

TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN

DATE: 27/11/2017REV 1 : 10/12/2017REV 2: 09/04/2018REV 3: 23/04/2018

*Traffic control works shall be installed & maintained in accordance with A.S. 1742.3 (Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads) & RTA Traffic controlat Work Sites Manual Version 4 June 2010.

*Local constraints may not allow sign and devices to be placed exactlyin accordance withthe TCP, therefore it may be necessary to place sign and devices as close as possible to the spacing indicated.

*Signs should generally placed 1 metre clear of the travelled path.

*Signs are to be Class 1 retro-reflective (day/night)

Install as per TCP and in accordance with any changes as shown on TCP

Team Leader (Onsite):

Signature:

Date:

Ticket: Orange/Red/Yellow (Circle Appropriate)

Ticket No:

Reasons for modification:

Email to: [email protected]

AREA:

LOCATION:

TCP NO:

SHEET NO:

WORK VEHICLE

WORK ZONE

AUTHORISED TRAFFICCONTROLLER

700 MM TRAFFIC CONESWITH REFLECTIVE NIGHT STRIP WITH 220 MM SPACING

LEGENDSPS

PARK ST/PITT ST, SYDNEY

TCP-SPS-PAR-PITT-EB-PEDMGT-NBSB-000002

1 OF 1

DRAWN BY:

CERTIFICATE NO:

SIGNATURE:

PLAN CHECKED BY:

CERTIFICATE NO:

SIGNATURE:

SAMANTH JADALA

0044399691

BUS LANEBUS LANE

BUS LANE

PA

RK

ING

LN

PA

RK

ING

LN

CA

ST

LER

EA

GH

ST

RE

ETPARK STREET

PIT

T S

TR

EE

T

PIT

T S

TR

EE

TPARK STREET

PE

DE

ST

RIA

NS

T8-2R US

E O

TH

ER

FO

OT

PA

THT8-3

FO

OT

PA

TH

CL

OS

ED

T8-4

PEDESTRIANDIVERSION

ROUTE

PEDESTRIAN DIVERSIONROUTE

BUS STOP CLOSED

PE

DE

ST

RIA

NS

FO

OT

PA

TH

CL

OS

ED

US

E O

TH

ER

FO

OT

PA

TH

ABDULLAH KHAN

0032576588

NOTE:

1. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TOBUSINESS & RESIDENTS TO BE MAINTAINED.

2. TCP DEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTCAWS TCP-61.

3. TCP may be used in conjunction withTCP-SPS-PAR-AL-2301

www.invarion.com

NOT TO SCALE

N

WORK VEHICLE

WORK ZONE



LEGEND

TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN

DATE: 04/01/2018REV 1: 18/01/2018REV 2: 20/03/2018REV 3: 09/04/2018REV 4: 18/06/2018







Signature:

Date:


Ticket No:



AREA:

LOCATION:

TCP NO:

SHEET NO:

SPS

CASTLEREAGH ST,SYDNEY

TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-1401

1 OF 1

DRAWN BY:

CERTIFICATE NO:

SIGNATURE:

PLAN CHECKED BY:

CERTIFICATE NO:

SIGNATURE:

SAMANTH JADALA

0044399691

ABDULLAH KHAN

0032576588

BUSLANE

BUSLANE

BUSLANE

BUSLANE

CA

ST

LER

EA

GH

ST

MARKET ST

PARK ST

T1-5-2 *T1-5-2 *

40M

40M

15MMERGETAPER

T5-5

Approximatespeed of traffic

km/h

Traffic controlat beginning of

taper

Lateral shifttaper Merge taper

45 or less 15 0 15

46-55 15 15 30

56-65 30 30 60

20MBUFFER

ZONE

T2-6-XT2-6-1 T2-6-XT2-6-1

NOTE:

1.This TCP is developed in accordance withTCAWS TCP-101.

2. When used in conjunction with TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401 suitable provisionfor pedestrians crossing is to be made.

ENDROAD WORK

T2-16

www.invarion.com

NOT TO SCALE

N

TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN

DATE: 21/12/2017REV 1: 18/01/2018REV 2: 09/04/2018REV 3: 18/06/2018







Signature:

Date:


Ticket No:



AREA:

LOCATION:

TCP NO:

SHEET NO:

WORK VEHICLE

WORK ZONE



LEGEND

SPS

PARK ST, SYDNEY

TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301

1 OF 1

DRAWN BY:

CERTIFICATE NO:

SIGNATURE:

PLAN CHECKED BY:

CERTIFICATE NO:

SIGNATURE:

SAMANTH JADALA

0044399691

BUS LANEBUS LANE

BUS LANE

PA

RK

ING

LN

PA

RK

ING

LN

CA

ST

LER

EA

GH

ST

RE

ET

PIT

T S

TR

EE

T

PIT

T S

TR

EE

T

PARK STREET

BUS STOP OPEN

TRAFFIC FLOW


BUS STOP OPEN

ABDULLAH KHAN

0032576588


km/h


taper


45 or less 15 0 15

46-55 15 15 30

56-65 30 30 60

NIG

HT

RO

AD

WO

RK

AH

EA

D

T1-2

23 *

T1-2

24 *

40M

40M

40M

T5-5

15MM

ER

GE

TAP

ER

NIGHTROADWORK

AHEAD

T1-223 *

T1-224 *

NIGHTROADWORK

AHEAD

T1-223 *

T1-224 * 40m

40m

T5-5

BATHURST ST END

GE

OR

GE

ST

EN

DR

OA

D W

OR

K

T2-1

6

ENDROAD WORK

T2-16

40M

NOTE:

1. TCP developed in accordance with TCAWS TCP-83.

2. This TCP may be used in conjunction with TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-0302.

T2-6-2

3.2M Min Lane widthto be maintained

www.invarion.com

NOT TO SCALE

N

TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN








Signature:

Date:


Ticket No:



AREA:

LOCATION:

TCP NO:

SHEET NO:

WORK VEHICLE

WORK ZONE



LEGEND

SPS


TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-0202

1 OF 1

DRAWN BY:

CERTIFICATE NO:

SIGNATURE:

PLAN CHECKED BY:

CERTIFICATE NO:

SIGNATURE:

SAMANTH JADALA

0044399691

ABDULLAH KHAN

0032576588

BUS LANEBUS LANE

BUS LANE

PA

RK

ING

LN

PA

RK

ING

LN

CA

ST

LER

EA

GH

ST

RE

ET

PARK STREET

PIT

T S

TR

EE

T

PIT

T S

TR

EE

T

PARK STREET

CA

ST

LER

EA

GH

ST

RE

ET

BATHURST ST BATHURST ST


TEMPORARY FIBREGLASSRAMP

SAFETY BARRIER

Traffic Controllers to assist pedestrians

NOTE:


2. Temporary fibreglass ramps to be installedboth sides of street for pedestrian movements.

3. TCP may be used in conjunction withTCP-SPS-PIT-NB-0201

PA

RK

ING

BA

YPEDESTRIANS

T8-2L

PEDESTRIANS

USE OTHERFOOTPATH

FOOTPATHCLOSED

FOOTPATHCLOSED T8-4

FOOTPATHCLOSEDAHEAD

PEDESTRIANS www.invarion.com

NOT TO SCALE

N

BUS LANEBUS LANE

BUS LANE

PA

RK

ING

LN

PA

RK

ING

LN

CA

ST

LER

EA

GH

ST

RE

ET

PARK STREETP

ITT

ST

RE

ET

PIT

T S

TR

EE

T

PARK STREET

CA

ST

LER

EA

GH

ST

RE

ET

TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN








Signature:

Date:


Ticket No:



AREA:

LOCATION:

TCP NO:

SHEET NO:

WORK VEHICLE

WORK ZONE



LEGENDSPS


TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-1201

1 OF 1

DRAWN BY:

CERTIFICATE NO:

SIGNATURE:

PLAN CHECKED BY:

CERTIFICATE NO:

SIGNATURE:

SAMANTH JADALA

0044399691

ABDULLAH KHAN

0032576588

TRAFFIC FLOW

ENDROAD WORK

T2-16

NOTE:


2. TCP can be used in conjunction withTCP-SPS-PIT-NB-0202.

Par

king

Ln

Par

king

Ln

BATHURST ST

T1-224 * T1-224 *40M

40M

40MR

OA

D W

OR

K

ON

SID

E R

OA

D

T1-2

5

40M

NIGHTROADWORK

AHEAD

T1-223 *

NIGHTROADWORK

AHEAD

T1-223 *

T2-6-2 T2-6-2

www.invarion.com

NOT TO SCALE

N

WORK VEHICLE

WORK ZONE



LEGEND

TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN

DATE: 18/01/2018REV 1: 09/04/2018REV 2: 18/06/2018







Signature:

Date:


Ticket No:



AREA:

LOCATION:

TCP NO:

SHEET NO:

SPS

CASTLEREAGH ST,SYDNEY

TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-2401

1 OF 1

DRAWN BY:

CERTIFICATE NO:

SIGNATURE:

PLAN CHECKED BY:

CERTIFICATE NO:

SIGNATURE:

SAMANTH JADALA

0044399691

BUSLANE

BUSLANE

BUSLANE

BUSLANE

CA

ST

LER

EA

GH

ST

MARKET ST

PARK ST


km/h


taper


45 or less 15 0 15

46-55 15 15 30

56-65 30 30 60

20MBUFFER

ZONE

NOTE:

1.This TCP is developed in accordance withTCAWS TCP-100.

2. When used in conjunction with TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401 suitable provisionfor pedestrians crossing is to be made.

3. Traffic Cones to be adjusted to suit work location.

15MMERGETAPER

60MTAPER

15MMERGETAPER

80M

T5-5

T1-224 * T1-224 *

T2-6-2 T2-6-2

T5-5

T2-6-2T2-6-2

40M

RO

AD

WO

RK

O

N S

IDE

RO

AD

T1-2

5

ENDROAD WORK

T2-16

ABDULLAH KHAN

0032576588

www.invarion.com



Appendix 4 Haulage routes


JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0001 Castlereagh Street exit to Anzac Bridge

JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0003 Anzac Bridge to Castlereagh Street access

JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0004 Anzac Bridge to Pitt Street access

JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0005 Castlereagh Street to ED Southbound

JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0006 ED Northbound to Castlereagh Street

JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0007 ED Northbound to Pitt Street

JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0008 Northside to Pitt Street

JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0009 Northside to Castlereagh Street

JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0010 Castlereagh Street to northside

Map data ©2017 Google 200 m

3 min (550 m)

9 min (2.9 km)

500 m

350 m

400 m

650 m

160 m

400 m

350 m

JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284-0001

Castlereagh Street to Anzac Bridge


Continue to follow Western Distributor/A4

Destination will be on the right

2.0 km

180 m

230 m

550 m

400 m

JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284

Anzac Bridge to Castlereagh St


Continue to follow Western Distributor/A4

1.4 km

400 m

38 m

74 m

500 m

180 m

JCG-SPS-TM-DWG-002284

Anzac Bridge to Pitt Street access


120 m

66 m

150 m

250 m

500 m

50 m

66 m


Castlereagh site to ED southbound


4 min (1.0 km)

49 m

450 m

350 m

120 m

3 min (550 m)

180 m

47 m

JCG-SPS-TM_DWG-002284-0006

ED Northbound to Castlereagh St


Destination will be on the right

49 m

450 m

400 m

26 m


ED NB to Pitt Street access


Toll road

100 m

250 m

750 m

120 m

350 m

400 m

26 m


Northside to Pitt


Toll road

100 m

250 m

750 m

180 m

47 m

69 m

240 m


Northside to Castlereagh


500 m

500 m

400 m

1.7 km


Castlereagh St to northside



Appendix 5 EIS Excerpt

338 Sydney Metro | Chatswood to Sydenham EIS

Chapter 8 – Construction traffic and transport

8.4.15 Pitt Street StationVehicle movement forecasts and routesThe anticipated vehicle numbers (heavy and light vehicles) at the Pitt Street Station construction site over a typical day are provided in Figure 8-38. This graph shows that the peak heavy vehicle movements in the AM peak period (7am to 10am) would be six heavy vehicles per hour during the demolition and excavation phases.

The proposed haul routes are shown in Figure 8-39. Access and egress to and from the Pitt Street north site would be right in from Pitt Street, and right in, right out via Castlereagh Street. Access and egress to and from the Pitt Street south site would be right in from Bathurst Street, and right out to Pitt Street.

Sydney Metro | Chatswood to Sydenham EIS 339

Construction traffic and transport – Chapter 8

Heavy vehicles

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

7am

– 8

am

8am

– 9

am

9am

– 1

0am

10am

– 1

1am

11am

– 1

2pm

12p

m –

1p

m

1pm

– 2

pm

2pm

– 3

pm

3pm

– 4

pm

4p

m –

5p

m

5pm

– 6

pm

6p

m –

7p

m

7pm

– 8

pm

8p

m –

9p

m

9p

m –

10

pm

10p

m –

11p

m

11p

m –

12a

m

12am

– 1

am

1am

– 2

am

2am

– 3

am

3am

– 4

am

4am

– 5

am

5am

– 6

am

6am

– 7

am

Veh

icle

num

ber

s

Time of day

Demolition Excavation Fit-out

Light vehicles

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

7am

– 8

am

8am

– 9

am

9am

– 1

0am

10am

– 1

1am

11am

– 1

2pm

12p

m –

1p

m

1pm

– 2

pm

2pm

– 3

pm

3pm

– 4

pm

4p

m –

5p

m

5pm

– 6

pm

6p

m –

7p

m

7pm

– 8

pm

8p

m –

9p

m

9p

m –

10

pm

10p

m –

11p

m

11p

m –

12a

m

12am

– 1

am

1am

– 2

am

2am

– 3

am

3am

– 4

am

4am

– 5

am

5am

– 6

am

6am

– 7

am

Veh

icle

num

ber

s

Time of day

Demolition Excavation and fit-out

Figure 8-38 Pitt Street Station construction vehicle movements



Liverpool Street Cas

tler

eag

hS t

reet

Druitt Street

Wes

t er n

Dis

trib

uto

r

Pi t

tS t

reet

El iz

abe t

hSt

reet

Market Street

William Street

Park Street

Bathurst Street

Cah

ill E

xpre

ssw

ay

Geo

rge

S

tree

t

Co

lleg

e S

tree

t

KEY

Proposed construction site area Primary, Inbound

Primary, Outbound

Secondary, Inbound

Secondary, Outbound

Existing suburban rail

N

Indicative only, subject to design development

Figure 8-39 Pitt Street Station construction site haul routes

Active transport networkThe City Centre Access Strategy (Transport for NSW, 2013a) identifies Castlereagh Street as a future strategic cycle route. Depending on the timing of the implementation of this cycle facility, Sydney Metro would liaise with the CBD Coordination Office and the City of Sydney Council to manage the potential impacts to cyclists on this section of the cycle route, and the provision of any alternative facilities should they be necessary.

Footpaths surrounding the sites on Pitt, Bathurst and Castlereagh streets would be reduced in width by around 600 millimetres during the construction works. These footpaths are currently greater than three metres wide and, therefore, a 2.4 metres wide footpath would be maintained, in line with the width requirements for footpaths set out in the Austroads guidelines

Public transport servicesElizabeth, Castlereagh and Park streets provide part of the major routes for bus services through the Sydney CBD. The addition of construction vehicle routes on these streets may result in impacts to these bus services such as minor delays to travel times. In order to minimise these potential impacts, the Pitt Street construction sites would be arranged to ensure construction vehicles are loaded and unloaded off the street. Additionally, the Pitt Street Station north site has been arranged to avoid an access or egress point via Park Street to reduce the potential for impacts to bus services.



In the event that any bus stops around the Pitt Street construction sites are required to be temporarily relocated during the construction works, this would be carried out by Transport for NSW in consultation with the bus operators and the CBD Coordination Office. The temporary relocation of any bus stops would not impact the operation of any bus services, however it may result in some passenger having to walk a short distance further to access bus stops.

Parking and taxisThe Pitt Street Station construction sites would not result in any loss of parking or impacts to taxi facilities.

Road network performanceTable 8-25 and Figure 8-40 shows the impact of construction on nearby key intersections during construction. In summary, this shows that the intersection performance is maintained at all intersections during the construction phase of the project except for the Bathurst Street / Day Street intersection. At this intersection, the level of service deteriorates from C to D in the PM peak. This is likely due to the intersection currently operating close to its theoretical capacity (at a degree of saturation 0.93). The average delay only deteriorates from 41 to 46 seconds per vehicle and the degree of saturation deteriorates from 0.93 to 0.95. It is therefore considered that the impact of the construction traffic on the operational performance of this intersection would be minimal.

The Pitt Street Station and Barangaroo Station construction sites would both use the Western Distributor as their primary haul route. However, given the low volumes of anticipated hourly heavy and light vehicles generated by each site, the combined impact of vehicles travelling to and from both sites is not considered to cause a material impact on the performance of the Western Distributor.

Table 8-25 Pitt Street Station construction site intersection performance

Peak period

Without construction With construction

Average delay (second per

vehicle)Level of Service

Degree of saturation




Druitt Street / Sussex Street

AM 22 B 0.51 22 B 0.52

PM 26 B 0.70 26 B 0.69

Druitt Street / Kent Street

AM 17 B 0.67 17 B 0.65

PM 14 A 0.65 14 A 0.65

Druitt Street / Clarence Street

AM 20 B 0.87 18 B 0.87

PM 15 B 0.77 15 B 0.77

Druitt Street / Park Street / George Street / York Street

AM 18 B 0.80 18 B 0.79

PM 15 B 0.67 15 B 0.67

Park Street / Pitt Street

AM 18 B 0.63 18 B 0.63

PM 15 A 0.50 15 A 0.51



Peak period

Without construction With construction







Park Street / Castlereagh Street

AM 23 B 0.67 23 B 0.67

PM 30 C 0.72 30 C 0.72

Park Street / Elizabeth Street

AM 35 C 0.72 35 C 0.72

PM 38 C 0.82 38 C 0.82

Bathurst Street / Harbour Street

AM 49 D 0.93 50 D 0.93

PM 43 D 0.93 44 D 0.93

Bathurst Street / Day Street

AM 307 F 1.19 324 F 1.20

PM 41 C 0.93 46 D 0.95

Bathurst Street / Sussex Street

AM 14 A 0.75 14 A 0.61

PM 16 B 0.76 16 B 0.74

Bathurst Street / Kent Street

AM 21 B 0.78 20 B 0.79

PM 22 B 0.72 22 B 0.71

Bathurst Street / George Street

AM 10 A 0.45 10 A 0.45

PM 10 A 0.47 10 A 0.49

Bathurst Street / Pitt Street

AM 20 B 0.54 20 B 0.54

PM 26 B 0.55 27 B 0.57

Bathurst Street / Castlereagh Street

AM 22 B 0.55 22 B 0.55

PM 10 A 0.54 10 A 0.54

Bathurst Street / Elizabeth Street

AM 27 B 0.73 27 B 0.73

PM 18 B 0.64 17 B 0.66



Proposedconstruction site area

Signalisedintersection Base + Construction LoSBase LoS X X

KEY

Indicative only, subject to design development

Market Street

Park StreetC

larence S

treet

Yo

rk Street

Druitt Street

Western Distr

ibutor

Day S

tree

t

Su

ssex Street

Ken

t Street

Bathurst Street

Liverpool Street

Geo

rge

Str

eet

Pit

t S

tree

t

Cas

tler

eag

h S

tree

t

Eliz

abet

h S

tree

t

AM

PM

A A

B B AM

PM

B B

B B

AM

PM

B B

B B

AM

PM

B B

B B

AM

PM

B B

B B

AM

PM

B B

B B

AM

PM

B B

A A

AM

PM

B B

A A AM

PM

B B

A A

AM

PM

A A

A AAM

PM

B B

B B

AM

PM

B B

C C

AM

PM

D D

D D

AM

PM

C C

C C

AM

PM

F F

C D

N

Figure 8-40 Pitt Street Station intersection performance



Appendix 6 Road safety audit

Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works

SYDNEY METRO CITY AND SOUTHWEST - TUNNELS AND STATION EXCAVATIONSStage 3 Road Safety Audit Report

27 NOVEMBER 2017

iii

Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works

SYDNEY METRO CITY AND SOUTHWEST - TUNNELS AND STATION EXCAVATIONS

Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report

Report No F0007-AA009699-RSA-01

Date 27/11/2017

Revision Text 01

This report has been prepared for John Holland CPB Ghella JV (JHCPBG) in

accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment. Arcadis Australia Pacific

Pty Limited (ABN 76 104 485 289) cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or

reliance on the contents of this report by any third party.

REVISIONS

Revision Date Description Approved

by

Draft 24/11/2017 Draft Report Issue MM

01 27/11/2017 Report Issue MM / DT

V

SMCS TSE: Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works

CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 5

1.1 Establishing the audit team ................................................................................................ 5

1.2 Scope of the audit ............................................................................................................... 5

1.3 Responding to the road safety audit report ...................................................................... 5

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 6

2.1 Project information and site details................................................................................... 6

2.2 Previous road safety audit reports .................................................................................... 6

3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................. 7

3.1 Commencement meetings .................................................................................................. 7

3.2 Site inspection ..................................................................................................................... 7

3.3 Examination of available materials .................................................................................... 7

3.4 Determination of risk .......................................................................................................... 8

4 AUDIT FINDINGS .................................................................................................................. 10

4.1 General ............................................................................................................................... 11

5 AUDIT TEAM STATEMENT .................................................................................................. 16

TABLES Table 3-1 Examination materials provided .................................................................... 7 Table 3-2 How often is the problem likely to lead to a crash? ....................................... 8 Table 3-3 What is the likely severity of the resulting crash type?.................................. 8 Table 3.4 Determination of risk ...................................................................................... 9 Table 3-5 The resulting level of risk ............................................................................... 9

FIGURES Figure 2-1 Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works (Image

courtesy NSW Globe) .................................................................................................... 6


Stage 3 Road Safety Audit Report, Report No. F0007-AA009699-RSA-01 5

1 INTRODUCTION

This report presents the findings of a Road Safety Audit – Stage 3 at the substantial

detailed design stage for the proposed Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct -

Local Area Works for the Sydney Metro City and Southwest – Tunnels and Station

excavations (SMCS TSE).

1.1 Establishing the audit team

The Road Safety Audit was carried out at the request of Arcadis Associate Technical

Director, Mr David Robertson. The audit was conducted by an audit team comprising:

Marcos Mejia – ID No: RSA-02-0576

Senior Road Safety Auditor – Level 3 (Lead auditor)

Arcadis

Daniel Talevski – ID No: RSA-02-0670

Senior Road Safety Auditor – Level 2

1.2 Scope of the audit

This Road Safety Audit has been carried out in accordance Schedule C1 – SWTC

Section 3.19, RMS Guidelines for Road Safety Audit Practices, Schedule C1

Appendix 8 Ref B50, Roads and Traffic Authority NSW - ‘Guidelines for Road Safety

Audit Practices, July 2011 (with reference to current practices outlined in Austroads

Guide to Road Safety Part 6 Road Safety Audit (2009)) as part of the process for

ensuring that safety elements were fully considered in the design of the project.

The role of the independent road safety audit team in the context of this commission

is:

Examination of the design documents provided, specifically the TSE Contractor’s

Activities that have an impact on any Local Areas including physical alterations,

change of use and / or introduction of new hazards.

Preparation of a Road Safety Audit report.

1.3 Responding to the road safety audit report

As set out in the Road Safety Audit guidelines, the responsibility for the road design

rests with the designer and project manager, not with the auditor. The project

manager is under no obligation to accept the audit findings and if applicable, audit

recommendations. Rather, the audit provides the opportunity to highlight potential

road safety problems and have them formally considered by the designer and project

manager in conjunction with all other project considerations. In general, there are four

methods of responding to an audit report. In order of preference, they are: Associates:

1. Remove the obstacle,

2. Redesign the obstacle so it can be safely traversed,

3. Relocate the obstacle to where it is less likely to be struck, and

4. Reduce impact severity by using an appropriate breakaway device.

Finally, it is not the role of the auditor to approve the designer or project manager’s

responses to the audit. The auditor is however able to provide advice and assist in the

determination of a suitable design response pursuant to reaching an agreement on a

suitable response and / or design amendment.



2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 Project information and site details

There are two SMCSTSE Pitt Street Station construction sites located in the Sydney

CBD area. Pitt Street Station northern site is located adjacent Pitt Street, Park Street and Castlereagh Street and Pitt Street southern site is located on Pitt Street south of

Bathurst Street between the Edinburgh Castle and Princeton apartment buildings. Proposed works include;

New driveway entrance and exit to the southern SMCSW TSE construction site from Pitt St south of the existing intersection with Bathurst St.,

New driveway exit from the southern SMCSW TSE construction site to Pitt St south of the existing intersection with Bathurst St.,

Removal of parking spaces along Pitt St,

Relocation and removal of road furniture along Pitt St and Castlereagh St, coordination of utilities adjustments, line marking and stormwater drainage.

Figure 2-1 Pitt Street Station Excavation and Precinct - Local Area Works (Image courtesy NSW Globe)

2.2 Previous road safety audit reports

No previous road safety audit reports were provided to the audit team.



3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION

3.1 Commencement meetings

A commencement meeting was held on Thursday 16 November 2017 in the SMCS

TSE office. The issues discussed consisted of:

Approach to be adopted for the audit.

Material / Information to be provided for the Audit.

Scope of the Audit and the design disciplines related to this Audit.

Timeframe for conducting the Audit and Reporting.

3.2 Site inspection

A site inspection was conducted on Thursday 16 November 2017 between 3pm and

5pm. The weather conditions were clear and fine.

3.3 Examination of available materials

The Substantial detailed design stage (SDD) drawings listed below were made

available to the Road Safety Audit team for review.

Table 3-1 Examination materials provided

Drawing No Notes / Comments

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521501 COVER SHEET

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521502 SCHEDULE OF DRAWINGS

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521504 GENERAL NOTES

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521506 GENERAL LEGEND

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521507 DRAWING DELETED

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521510 OVERVIEW PLAN

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521511 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SHEET 1

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521512 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SHEET 2

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521551 DRIVEWAY DETAIL PLAN

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521561 DRIVEWAY SECTIONS

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521801 SIGNAGE AND LINEMARKING PLAN - STAGE 1 - SHEET 1

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521802 SIGNAGE AND LINEMARKING PLAN - STAGE 1 - SHEET 2

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521811 SIGNAGE SCHEDULE

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521881 EXISTING STREET LIGHTING PLAN

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521882 PROPOSED STREET LIGHTING PLAN

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521901 SWEPT PATH PLAN - SHEET 1

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-DRG-521902 SWEPT PATH PLAN - SHEET 2

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523001 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - GENERAL UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 1

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523002 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - GENERAL UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 2

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523011 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 1

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523012 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 2

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523021 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - COMMUNICATIONS UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 1

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523022 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - COMMUNICATIONS UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 2

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523031 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 1

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523032 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 2

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523041 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - GAS UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 1

SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-UT-DRG-523042 UTILITIES CO-ORDINATION - GAS UTILITIES PLAN SHEET 2



3.4 Determination of risk

The following tables are extracted from the AGRS06/09 Austroads Road Safety Audit

Third Edition (2009) and are provided as background to the method by which the risk

rating attributed to each road safety audit finding has been determined.

Table 3-2 How often is the problem likely to lead to a crash?

Frequency Description

Frequent Once or more per week

Probable Once or more per year (but less than once a week)

Occasional Once every five or ten years

Improbable Less often than once every ten years

Table 3-3 What is the likely severity of the resulting crash type?

Severity Description Examples

Catastrophic Likely multiple deaths

High speed, multi-vehicle crash on freeway.

Car runs into crowded bus stop.

Bus and petrol tanker collide.

Collapse of a bridge or tunnel.

Serious Likely death or serious

injury

High or medium-speed vehicle/vehicle

collision.

High or medium-speed collision with a fixed

roadside object.

Pedestrian or cyclist struck by car.

Minor Likely minor injury

Some low-speed vehicle collisions.

Cyclist falls from bicycle at low speed.

Left-turn rear-end crash in slip lane.

Limited Likely trivial injury or

property damage only

Some low-speed vehicle collisions.

Pedestrian walks into object (no head injury).

Car reverses into post.



Table 3.4 Determination of risk

Frequent Probable Occasional Improbable

Catastrophic Intolerable Intolerable Intolerable High

Serious Intolerable Intolerable High Medium

Minor Intolerable High Medium Low

Limited High Medium Low Low

Table 3-5 The resulting level of risk

Risk Suggested treatment approach

Intolerable Must be corrected.

High Should be corrected or the risk significantly reduced, if the treatment cost is

high.

Medium Should be corrected or the risk significantly reduced, if the treatment cost is

moderate, but not high.

Low Should be corrected or the risk significantly reduced, if the treatment cost is

low.

These tables provide an indication of the level of risk and how to respond to it,

however, the guide also states that this is not a scientific system and professional

judgement should be used at all times. The risk rating for each road safety audit

finding has been included in the schedule of Road Safety Audit findings in Section 4.



4 AUDIT FINDINGS

Issues identified during the Road Safety Audit are discussed in this section.

It should be noted that the opinions expressed in the following sections are those of

the Road Safety Audit Team.



4.1 General

Ref

No. Audit Finding Risk Designer / Project Manager Response

4.1.1 Southern Site, Pitt St exit Driveway.

The exit movements from the southern site appear to clash with vehicles parked in the mail zone. Construction vehicles exiting the site could potentially crash with a vehicle parked in the mail zone.

Low The driveway has been relocated. This conflict no longer exist.

4.1.2 Northern Site, Pitt St existing entry/exit Driveway

The service vehicle exit movements from the northern site appear to clash with vehicles parked in the loading zone. Additionally, there appears to be limited road width available for 8.8m service vehicles to perform the exit manoeuvre.

Medium The driveway design shown in the SDD package is no longer relevant. The

demolition contractor has removed the parking bays and loading zone. This

configuration is proposed to be retained for these works.



Ref


Construction vehicles exiting the site could potentially crash with a vehicle parking in the loading zone.

4.1.3 Northern Site, Pitt St existing entry/exit Driveway

The existing driveway shown in the survey appears to be in the wrong location. The actual existing driveway is located north of the driveway illustrated on the plans. The location of the existing driveway is marked in yellow in the illustration above.

Note Only. The location of the driveway is now surveyed. The driveway location will be

correctly shown on the updated drawings.

4.1.4 Northern Site, Castlereagh St entry/exit turning movements. Medium The turnpath will be updated to show the right turn from the through lane.

The Contractor will manage traffic as part of the Construction Traffic

Management Plan.



Ref


The turning movements show the trucks starting from the right hand side lane, immediately after the last parking space. There appears to be a potential clash with a parked vehicle. It was observed during the site visit that there are long traffic queues during peak hour. The entering manoeuvre shown in the turn path would be unrealistic if access is required during the peak hours and no traffic control is provided.

4.1.5 Northern Site, Castlereagh St exit driveway. Medium The Contractor will manage traffic as part of the Construction Traffic

Management Plan.



Ref


The turn path indicates that trucks exiting the site would need to turn into the second lane to perform the manoeuvre. As mentioned in issue 4.1.4, construction traffic exiting the site would potentially force their way into the heavy traffic in order to perform the indicated manoeuvre increasing the risk of collisions.

4.1.6 Northern Site, Castlereagh St entry/exit turning movements.

High. The construction vehicle traffic route will now travel along Castlereagh

Street. The right turn onto Park Street is no longer required.



Ref


The traffic movements show trucks turning right from Castlereagh St to Park St from the through lane. Vehicles turning right are required to use the turning lane. Construction vehicles turning from the through lane could potentially clash with vehicles turning right from the turning lane.

4.1.7 Pedestrian Activity in both sites.

There is high pedestrian activity around both sites. The footpaths on Castlereagh St (northern site) and on Pitt St (southern site) are particularly narrow. Pedestrians could be potentially unaware of vehicles travelling in and out of these locations, increasing the risk of vehicle/pedestrian type crashes.

Medium. The Contractor will manage pedestrian traffic as part of the Construction

Traffic Management Plan.



5 AUDIT TEAM STATEMENT

The Road Safety Audit was carried out by The Road Safety Audit Team using the

information made available to it. Every effort was made to ensure that all the safety

issues were considered.

The above Road Safety Audit findings and suggested actions are the opinion and the

judgement of The Road Safety Audit Team.

....................................................

Marcos Mejia – ID No: RSA-02-0576


Arcadis

....................................................

Daniel Talevski – ID No: RSA-02-0670


Arcadis

RSA-06741

Page 1 of 7 Pitt St Site Establishment

Road Safety Audit Report SHORT FORMAT

Title / Project Pitt St Site Establishment RSA P/L Reference RSA-06741 Work Package Sydney Metro City & Southwest – TSE Works Report Date 19 January 2018 Audit Stage Desktop Lead (Senior) Auditor

Secondary Auditor / Reviewer Anthea Jennings Chris Keramidas

Client John Holland CPB Ghella TMP / Drawings SMCSWTSE-JCG-SPS-TM-PLN-002284-B

Report Provider Road Safety Audits P/L

Desktop TMP Scope: The scope of the audit is to assess the plans on their merits and in the context of the road environment, not compliance-checking to standards and guidelines.

RSA-06741


Pitt St Site Establishment T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion

John Holland CPB Ghella Contact:

Response

x Status

y Headers*****

1. Pedestrian: TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-0302 The plans show that the bus stop on Park St is still operating within the closed footpath area.

Patrons will be moving to/from a bus and theclosed footpath.

Pedestrians may try to cross the road midblock intothe closed footpath area in order to access thebus.

Clarify how the pedestrians will access the bus stop.

Traffic controllers will be on site to guide pedestrians to the nearest signalised crossing point

Closed

RSA-06741




Response

x Status

y Headers*****

2. Signage: In several locations, it is proposed to provide pedestrians with ‘Footpath closed – Use Other Footpath – Pedestrian arrow’ signage.

Consider simplifying the signage. Noted but this is not a road safety issued

Closed

RSA-06741




Response

x Status

y Headers*****

3. Delineation: TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301 Northbound Pitt St traffic will be reduced to one lane at the Park St intersection. Traffic will need to use the left lane after the intersection to proceed north of Park St (red circle). However, there is no clear warning of: 1. The construction site potentially in their path; or 2. The lane movement / arrangement ahead.

1. Ensure adequate protection and delineation of the work zone from through traffic. Important

2. Provide delineation similar to that proposed in TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-1201. Also refer to point 5 below.

The work zone has been removed as this is no longer required. The through movement on Pitt Street is as per normal movement

Closed

RSA-06741




Response

x Status

y Headers*****

4. Pedestrians: TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301 The work zone will be adjacent to the pedestrian crossings on both the north side and east side of the intersection.

There are no barriers / fencing or similar to prevent a pedestrian entering the site.

Ensue pedestrians can safety navigate the work zone or are prevented from entering the zone,

The work zone has been removed as this is no longer required. The pedestrian movement on Pitt Street is as per normal movement

Closed

RSA-06741




Response

x Status

y Headers*****

5. Delineation: TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1201 Northbound Pitt St through traffic is to use the left turn lane, through the intersection (red circle).

The left lane has left turn pavement arrows. A driver may be confused as to:

Whether they can proceed north; and

If so, which side of the bollards to drive.

Review signage and pavement markings. Drawing amended to allow movement from through lane – no requirement for lane closures south of Park Street

Closed

RSA-06741


Explanatory Notes Short Format: This ‘short format’ report has been used by RSA P/L since 2008, initiated through requests by clients to assist their processes, for ease with stakeholders, and for timeliness. It is typically confined in use to construction traffic management and typically for discrete packages of plans / areas and often for large projects with repetitious small audit sections. The use of this format assumes that the reader/s know what a road safety audit is and how to respond to it. Projects: Audit points are often raised in projects in relation to: 1. specific themes (e.g. the use of a safety barrier type), or 2. the treatment of particular locations. Once key issues have been initially raised, they will not necessarily be re-raised in future audits. This will depend on the issue, the RSA’s perception of the client’s assessment and understanding of the issue, and other factors. Therefore, discrete audits as part of a project should be read and actioned by a project representative who is familiar with the audit history. Responding: Although the client receiving the report does not have to agree to the audit findings/suggestions, the issues and associated risks should be carefully considered. A written response should be made to all of the audit findings raised, then signed off by the responsible person from the project team. X

Response: The responder should fully or partially accept / reject the audit point and the comment / suggestion (i.e. not merely the suggestion) Y

Status: The status of the issue as it sits with the Project. i.e. ‘actioned’, ‘closed’, ‘pending information / further guidance’. Language: o Note: RSA P/L does not typically use the Austroads risk rating method, mostly because it can only be applied to some points and therefore can skew the perceived risk of other

points, and also due to it being a highly subjective approach, giving the false impression of objectivity.o ‘Urgent’ / ‘High-Risk’: Needs immediate attention / changes as per RSA suggestion or similar.o ‘Recommend’ / ‘Serious’ / ‘Important’: Must be robustly reviewed. Most likely requires a change to avoid a high-risk road environment for one or more user groups.o ‘Should’ / ‘Suggest’ / ‘Significant’: Based on the view of the RSA team the suggestion should be done, but it concedes that there could be reasons why inaction or alternative

action is equally correct. Must be robustly reviewed by contractor and where relevant key traffic engineering project stakeholders.o ‘Review’ / ‘Consider’: RSA is raising an observation but has no strong opinion on the outcome and need for changes. Project should review because it’s not an immediate and

high risk and may not be immediately obvious to RSA the reasons for the practice / setup / behaviour. May need monitoring.o ‘Minor’: Typically a low road-safety consequence / compliance issues (to guidelines or plans) / administrative controls. Unlikely to increase risk of crash.o ‘Note’: Little or no road safety significance. Typically added to give a complete picture of the design, site, context, analysis, auditors understanding.Intent of Issues Listing Order: Audit points might be clustered according to location, theme, or time. When this is not done and the audit comprises an uncategorised list of points, the key issues are often discussed first. However, there is no official ordering of points, and they should all be read on their merits and on the basis of the language guide above. References: Construction: 1. Austroads Guide to Road Safety – Road Safety Audit – 2009, 2. AS 1742.3 – 2009, 3. Road Management Act 2004 – Code of Practice – Worksite Safety – Traffic Management (2010), and Design: 4. Austroads guidelines and VicRoads supplements and technical publications as relevant. Safe System: Austroads guidelines encourage practitioners to adopt safe system principles within design and within road safety audits. Safe system (roads) calls for a design to not allow serious injury and fatalities to occur for the expected road users and the typical crash types expected for that design type. This design-objective is considered within this road safety audit as a ‘good practice’ objective. However, a road safety audit by definition does not have the aim of checking ‘Safe System conformance’. Process and Quality: RSA P/L’s quality assurance process is based on its senior auditors having a rich experience base, but also utilises customised checklists designed for niche areas in traffic engineering/road design (e.g. safety barriers, pavement shaping, CBD traffic management), in conjunction with a four-layer audit process: 1. on-site inspection; 2. media and data capture and review; 3. specialist / second auditor input; and (where warranted) 4. secondary blinded reviews. Audit Coverage: The audit has attempted to balance the safety needs of all road users. As per Austroads guidelines, the suggestions provided have attempted to be realistic/feasible and commensurate with the actual risk posed. Suggestions are made are from a safety perspective only, and are made in the absence of full project knowledge and design constraints. RSA P/L can provide a detailed risk assessment / issue evaluation report upon request. The audit raises potential safety risks noted / observed / anticipated by the audit team, and in particular the higher-risk issues. However, a road safety audit is fundamentally a subjective qualitative process undertaken by people, highly influenced by the experience, views and limitations of the individual team members. It is expected that the project team has competence to identify safety issues itself as the project progresses, and to ask the audit team further questions where necessary.

RE: Pitt Street North Site Operations - request for road safety auditor to provide comments

Hi Sue. If the only substantive change is as you have described in the email below, then I can confirm that there would be no ‘further’ road safety audit points raised. However, if you need me to check the actual TM thoroughly and provide a report, this would be days away due to current workload.

Regards.

Peter Harris|Manager and Principal AuditorRoad Safety Audits Pty Ltd

Suite 8|79 Manningham Road|Bulleen Victoria 3105

MIEAust CPEng | RPEQ |BE (Civil) | BB (Admin)

From: Sue Lewis Sent: Friday, 15 June 2018 4:49 PMTo: Peter Harris Subject: Fw: Pitt Street North Site Operations request for road safety auditor to provide comments

Pete

a couple of the reviewers have raised issues that the site establishment CTMP RSA is not relevant to the site operations phase - they have requested that you confirm in writing that this RSA is applicable - note that the same TCP, operations are proposed other than not allowing heavy vehicles to exit via the Pitt Street gate. Everything is packaged in the attachment

The RSA provided does not appear to be applicable to this CTMP and refers to Site Establishment. Is there an updated RSA which can be provided? Alternatively, is the Auditor able to confirm in writing that this is applicable and sufficient to cover this Site Operations CTMP?

Peter Harris Mon 18/06/2018 10:32 AM

To:Sue Lewis <



Appendix 7 Review comments

Sydney Metro City and Southwest - CTMP - Pitt Street North Site Operations rev C

Good Morning Sue,

The City has reviewed the “Construction Traffic Management Plan – Pitt Street North Site Operations” rev C, 19 June 2018, and found it acceptable.

Kind regards,

Tony LyEngineering Traffic OfficerCity Infrastructure & Traffic Operations

____

Telephone: 02 9246 7861cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential or subject to legal privilege. If you receive this email and you are not the addressee (or responsible for delivery of the email to the addressee), please note that any copying, distribution or use of this email is prohibited and as such, please disregard the contents of the email, delete the email and notify the sender immediately. _______________________________________________________________________________________________

Tony Ly Thu 28/06/2018 10:33 AM

To:Sue Lewis ;

Cc:RAMIREZ Giovanny ; Brogan, Philip MELLA Carl A ; Van Le ; Asad Rajbhoy

Document:Version: B-00Date of review: 30/05/2018

Item No

Contract Contractor Doc RevRequirement Ref (COA

or REMM)Stakeholder Reviewer Date Item Description, Page, Para, Drg ref TfNSW comment Contractor Response

1 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018

First paragraph only mentions decommissioning of driveways. At the TCG of 22/05/18 decommissioning of water treatment plants was mentioned, and, will hoardings be removed/changed? Please clarify what is involved in decommissioning.

Document amended

2 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018"External works will see changes to the existing hoarding…" What are those changes? Is there any impact to traffic/pedestrians in making those changes?

Document amended

3 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018Suggest adding a drawing/diagram/Appendix to help explain access points and parking

Document amended

4 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018Last paragraph mentions the Sydney CBD Utilities Works CTMP. Wasn’t this CTMP for a specific period and specific set of works? Please add some clarity to the reference of this CTMP.

Document amended

5 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018Suggest a copy and paste of any relevant information from previous CTMPs, into this section, makes it easier to review.

No change to document required

6 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018"per day" is used. What is the definition of a day, 24hrs, construction hours?

as noted in Table 1 - all hours


Table 1 is titled "Peak vehicle movements per hour". The paragraph above Table 1 says 160 trucks per day which would be 320 truck movements. If this is the case the Heavy Vehicle column is incorrect as it totals 164 movements per day. It appears there is some confusion around trucks and movements, please clarify. Note: the above calculation assumes a "day" is 24 hours.

Document amended


"The operation of the site will have an impact on the surrounding street system, however it is recognised that the traffic generation is well below EIS numbers." The numbers may be below but they will have an impact, what is the impact? How will it be mitigated?

Refer to Appendix 5

9 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018"...via the nominated vehicle crossing." Please clarify what and where the vehicle crossing is, and, how it will operate

Document amended

10 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 Section 3.2.6While other works and events that will occur are listed there is no discussion/analysis of the impacts or how it/they would be managed. Consider updating this section to show some analysis.

We do not manage other contractor impacts - that is the domain of SCO

11 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 SMCSWTSE-JAB-SPS-LW-521902Section 4.1 mentions 19m vehicles, but there are no 19m vehicles shown on this swept path drawing. Please update

Where they are unable to fit into site, as noted in Section 3.2.1

12 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018Are all work vehicles and deliveries confined to the footpath? If not, will a lane closure be required?

No as noted in Appendix 3

13 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 Where is the alternate bus stop and how are pedestrians directed to it? via Signs provided by SCO

14 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401Signs shown on TCP suggest traffic controllers are not stopping traffic, if so, how are traffic controllers assisting pedestrians across Castlereagh St?

by finding suitable gaps

15 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-1401This TCP states that it will be used in conjunction with TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401. If so, won't pedestrians be directed through the taper area? Please check and update as required

Drawing amended

16 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018Are all work vehicles and deliveries confined to the footpath? If not will a lane closure be required?

Refer to response to Item 12

17 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018This TCP states that it will be used in conjunction with TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301. If so, won't pedestrians be directed through the work area? Please check and update as required

No

18 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018Between George St and Pitt St sign spacings are shown as 120m plus a 15m taper. The total distance, in this section, is only 90m (approx.). Review.

Drawing amended

19 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018How will works be protected from traffic? TCP currently only shows cones on the lane line.

Refer to Appendix 3

20 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018The bus lane EB is about 5m wide? If, as the note suggests, a 3.2m lane is maintained this only leaves 1.8m. Is this enough room for work area and work vehicles?

The bus lane width is greater than 5m

21 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-0202Signs shown on TCP suggest traffic controllers are not stopping traffic, if so how are traffic controllers assisting pedestrians across Castlereagh St?


Sydney Metro City & Southwest

TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-0302

TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301

CTMP - Pitt St North Site Operations

Stakeholder Comment Tracker

Section 3.1

Section 3.2

TCP-SPS-PAR-PITT-EB-PEDMGT-NBSB-000002

Section 3.2.1

RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC ClosedCS Closed subject to additional action / information

22 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-2401This TCP states that it will be used in conjunction with TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401. If so, won't pedestrians be directed through the taper area? Please check and update as required

Drawing amended

23 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 30/05/2018 Road Safety Audits

The first Road Safety Audit included was undertaken in November 2017.

The second Road Safety Audit shown is for Pitt St Site Establishment and was undertaken in January 2018. This is an Operational CTMP.

A current road safety audit on this CTMP is required

Document amended

Pitt Street Site Operations

Printed copies are uncontrolled Page 1 of 1

CTMP Review Comments Sheet Project Title Sydney Metro City & south west –Tunnels and station excavation contract

CTMP Title: Pitt Street Site Operations Document Number: SMCSWTSE JCG SPS TM PLN 002285 B-

Reviewer: City of Sydney Tony Ly Responder: S Lewis Date:6 June 2018 Date:15 June 2018

Item Section/ Page Comments Response

1 4 “a combination of truck types will be used during the site establishment works. These trucks may be single unit, semi-trailers, bin trucks and 5t tippers”

Section refers to site establishment instead of site operations, 8.8 metre medium rigid vehicles are the largest vehicle approved to be used for the site operation phase based on the provided swept paths

Document amended to reflect site operations

Swept path drawing updated to show 10 wheel tippers. Note that semi-trailers will be used under lane/ parking area closure

2 4.1 “Material will be removed and delivered to site using a combination of vehicles. These trucks will range in size from 5.5m to 19.0m. Semi-trailer deliveries will occur out of hours”

See comment 1

Oversize and over-mass deliveries will be assessed through the oversize and over mass application, separate to the Construction Traffic Management Plan


Yes, as noted in Section 3.2.9

Document: CTMP - Pitt Street North Site OperationsVersion: BDate of review: 31/05/2018

Item No Contract Contractor Doc Rev Requirement Ref (COA or REMM) Stakeholder Reviewer Date Item Description,

Page, Para, Drg ref RMS comment Contractor Response

1 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CM 31-May-2018 3.1

"External works will see changes to the existing hoarding to facilitate capping beam works within the site." Section 3.2.3 indicates that "During the hoarding works and the acoustic shed removal, pedestrians will be diverted from the affected footpaths during weekends or at night." However none of the TCPs are listed as applicable for hoarding works on the table in Appendix 3

Document amended

2 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CM 31-May-2018 3.2

"There will be approximately 5000 truck movements per month, during peak periods with 160 trucks per day." The numbers in Table 1 indicate this will be approximately 160 truck movements per day. Please confirm whether it is projected to be 160 trucks per day or 160 truck movements per day (equivalent to 80 trucks per day). If it is proposed to be 160 trucks per day, Table 1 will need to be amended to reflect the corresponding number of truck movements.

Document amended

3 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CM 31-May-2018 3.2.1

"The operation of the site will have an impact on the surrounding street system, however, it is recognised that the traffic generation is well below the EIS numbers." This statement appears to indicate that it is 160 truck movements proposed (80 trucks), as reflected in Table 1.

Irrespective of the numbers, apart from saying there will be an impact, this section does not discuss any detaiils regarding what the impact on traffic flows will actually be or any proposed meas res to mitigate an res lting impact

Refer to Appendix 5 and document amended

4 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CM 31-May-2018 App 3

TCP-SPS-PAR-EB-1301 - Park St between George St and Pitt St is only 90m. Signage spacing here shows 120m plus taper. Please review spacing of signs on this TCP through this section.

Drawing amended

5 TSE JHCPBG B RMS CM 31-May-2018 App 5

It is noted that the latest RSA report is for the Site Establishment stage of works. Confirmation from Road Safety Auditor that this RSA is applicable and sufficient to cover Site Operations should be included.

Noted

Stakeholder Comment TrackerSydney Metro City & Southwest

RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC ClosedCS Closed subject to additional action / information

Document: CTMP ‐ Pitt St North Site Operations

Version: B

Date of

review:6/06/2018

Item No

Contract Contractor Doc RevItem Description, Page, Para, Drg

refStakeholder

Requirement Ref (COA or REMM)

TfNSW comment Contractor Response

1 TSE JHCPBG JV B 3.1 SCO

The CTMP referenced for Sydney CBD Utility

Works expires June 2018. Are these works

expected to continue throughout the site

operations phase of this site?

Document amended

2 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO

Section 3.1 states that light vehicles can use Pitt

St for access / egress, however Section 3.2.1

implies that heavy vehicles will use this for

access. Please confirm / update as appropriate

and suggest including some detail on when this

access may be used by heavy vehicles.

Document amended

3 TSE JHCPBG JV B SCO

Please describe the impact site operations will

have on the surrounding road network. Are

there any mitigation measures which will be

implemented?

Document amended and refer to Appendix 5

4 TSE JHCPBG JV B 3.2.2 SCO

Where lane closures and bus stop closures are

required, please provide advance notice to SCO

so as bus stop signage can be prepared. A

minimum of 3 business days is required for this.

Noted


Suggest presenting these works at the

fortnightly emergency services meeting

facilitated by SCO, and including a reference to

this meeting in the text.

Noted - this would form part of face to face discussions

Stakeholder Comment TrackerSydney Metro City & Southwest

3.2.1

RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC Closed

6 TSE JHCPBG JV B 5.4 - Table 2 SCO

Suggest including advance warning signage in

this section as it appears to be utilised during

works requiring lane and/or footpath closures.Document amended

7 TSE JHCPBG JV B 5.7 SCOIt may be beneficial to include the 24hr traffic

team phone number in this section as well. Document amended


A number of other plans have been referenced

in this CTMP but have not been included here

e.g. White Bay and Pitt St Demolition. Should

these be included?

Document amended

9 TSE JHCPBG JV B DRG-521902 SCOPlease provide swept paths for the largest

vehicle intended to do these movements.

Section 4 implies this is a 19m semi‐trailer.

Semi trailer deliveries will be on street as they cannot perform this manoeuvre

10 TSE JHCPBG JV B TCP-SPS-CAS-SB-0401 SCO

Please consider repositioning the 'footpath

closed ahead' sign closer to the corner of Market

St to encourage pedestrians to use the signalised

crossing.

Drawing amended

11 TSE JHCPBG JV B TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-0202 SCO

Barrier board appears to be missing from the

southern side of the footpath closure. Please

update to include.

Drawing amended

12 TSE JHCPBG JV B TCP-SPS-PIT-NB-1201 SCO

Please advise what will be used to help guide

motorists continuing through the intersection

into lane 2. The T5‐5 chevron sign may not be

enough.

Drawing amended

13 TSE JHCPBG JV B Appendix 4 SCOSeveral of the haulage routes do not align with

the EIS. Is an amendment and/or consistency

report required for this?

No MCoA E88 clearly states the approval pathway for haulage routes

14 TSE JHCPBG JV B Appendix 5 SCO

The RSA provided does not appear to be

applicable to this CTMP and refers to Site

Establishment. Is there an updated RSA which

can be provided? Alternatively, is the Auditor

able to confirm in writing that this is applicable

and sufficient to cover this Site Operations

CTMP?

Noted

construction traffic management plan – pitt street north ...€¦ · sydney metro traffic team...

Documents