consumer theory

49
Consumer Theory

Upload: kenton

Post on 13-Jan-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Consumer Theory. What is Consumer Theory?. Study of how people use their limited means to make purposeful choices. Assumes that consumers understand their choices (possibilities) and the prices (opportunity costs) associated with each choice. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Consumer Theory

1

Consumer Theory

Page 2: Consumer Theory

2

What is Consumer Theory?

Study of how people use their limited means to make purposeful choices.

Assumes that consumers understand their choices (possibilities) and the prices (opportunity costs) associated with each choice.

Assumes that consumers consider the alternatives and choose the one they like best.

Page 3: Consumer Theory

3

Consumer Theory - Why?

Two important reasons:– to understand the foundations of market

demand (bake the demand curve from scratch)

– to address several interesting consumer theory issues that are best understood using this model rather than the aggregate demand model

Page 4: Consumer Theory

4

Two Components of Consumer Demand

Opportunities:– What can the consumer afford?– What are the consumption possibilities?– Summarized by the budget constraint

Preferences:– What does the consumer like?– How much does a consumer like a good?– Summarized by the utility function

Page 5: Consumer Theory

5

What is a Budget Constraint?

A budget constraint shows the consumer’s purchase opportunities as every combination of two goods that can be bought at given prices using a given amount of income.

The budget constraint measures the combinations of purchases that a person can afford to make with a given amount of monetary income.

Page 6: Consumer Theory

6

Li’s Demand for Wheat and Rice

Illustration of consumer theory Li’s demand for wheat and rice depends upon

the prices for these goods, her income, and her preferences.

Suppose we look first at her budget constraint:– Wheat costs $4/lb.– Rice costs $2/lb.– Li has $40 of income.

Page 7: Consumer Theory

7

Li’s Budget Constraint

The mathematical expression for Li’s budget constraint is:

I = PW W + PR R R = I/PR - (PW / PR)W

I like to refer to the |slope| of the budget line as the ERS=Economic Rate of Substitution

In this case it is PW / PR

For Li: PW=$4 PR=$2 I=$40 ERS=2

Page 8: Consumer Theory

8

Graph of Li’s Budget Constraint The graph to the right

shows a picture of Li’s budget constraint.

Li's Budget Constraint

0

5

10

15

20

0 5 10 15 20

Wheat

Ric

e

Each blue diamond is a point from the table.

The slope is equal to -2, as shown on the last slide.

Page 9: Consumer Theory

9

Budget Line gymnastics

An increase in income only. An increase in the price of wheat only. A decrease in the price of rice only. Income doubles as do the prices of wheat and

rice.

Note: Changes in the price of wheat relative to the price of rice will change the ERS.

Page 10: Consumer Theory

10

Preferences

Let R = “at least as good as”– B0 R B1 means: B0 is at least as good as B1

Let IN = “indifferent to”– B0 R B1 and B1 R B0 implies B0 IN B1

Let P = “strictly preferred to”– B0 R B1 and not B1 R B0 implies B0 P B1

Page 11: Consumer Theory

11

Preferences

Basic assumptions about an individual’s preferences (R) over bundles (B)– more is better: If B0 has more in it than B1 then

B0 R B1

– transitivity: If B0 R B1 and B1 R B2 then B0 R B2

– average bundles are at least as good as extreme bundles: If B0 IN B1 and B2 is an “average” of B0 and B1, then B2 R B0 and B1

Page 12: Consumer Theory

12

Utility and Preferences

Utility is the way economists represent preferences.

Among two bundles, the one with the higher utility is the preferred bundle.

If two bundles have the same utility, we say that the consumer is indifferent.

Page 13: Consumer Theory

13

Indifference Curves Preferences that satisfy the conditions I have noted

above can be represented by indifference curves. The set of all indifference curves that describe an

individual’s preferences are referred to as an indifference curve map.

An indifference curve connects all of the bundles that a consumer likes equally.

We will assume only two goods when using indifference curve analysis.

Page 14: Consumer Theory

14

Indifference Curve Map - Properties

An indifference curve should not slope up.

Indifference curves can not cross one another.

Better bundles are to the northeast. Indifference curves will not be “bowed

out.”

Page 15: Consumer Theory

15

Li’s Preferences in Indifference Curves

An indifference curve connects all the bundles that have the same utility.

Higher indifference curves indicate more utility (IC2 is preferred to IC1).

Lower indifference curves indicate less utility (IC1 is preferred to IC0).

The indifference curve map is FULL of indifference curves.

Li's Indifference Curves

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 10 20

Wheat

Ric

e

I2

I1

I0

Page 16: Consumer Theory

16

The Marginal Rate of Substitution

The Marginal Rate of Substitution(MRS) tells us how much of one good Li would willingly trade for an incremental unit of the other good and remain indifferent.

The MRS=|slope| of the indifference curve at a bundle.

Common to assume the MRS declines as we move down an indifference curve.

Li's Indifference Curves

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 10 20

Wheat

Ric

e

I2

I1

I0

Page 17: Consumer Theory

17

How Much Wheat and Rice

Li’s optimal amount of wheat and rice to consume is the amount that maximizes Li’s utility subject to her budget constraint.

In the graph...– Get to the highest indifference curve possible

– Stay on the budget constraint (b/c more is

better)

Page 18: Consumer Theory

18

How to Find Li’s Best Combination

Wheat

Rice

20

10

IC0

IC1

IC2

W*

R*

The black bundle is best. The pink bundle is not the

best. Li has spent all her income but is not on the highest indifference curve possible.

Bundles n/e of IC0 are better and some are affordable.

At (W*, R*) she is doing the best she can subject to her budget constraint.

Page 19: Consumer Theory

19

How to Find the Best Combination

Utility is maximized when:– the indifference curve is just tangent to the budget

line. Utility is maximized when:

– you are on the budget line and– the slope of the indifference curve equals the slope

of the budget line Utility is maximized when:

– Income=PRR + PWW

– MRS=ERS

Page 20: Consumer Theory

20

The “bang per buck” story Let MUW = Li’s marginal utility of wheat

– it measures the change in utility as we change wheat consumption by an incremental unit while holding rice constant

Let MUR = Li’s marginal utility of rice– it measures the change in utility as we change rice

consumption by an incremental unit while holding wheat constant

Common to assume that marginal utilities decline as we increase consumption - the law of diminishing marginal utility

Page 21: Consumer Theory

21

The “bang per buck” story The MRS = MUW / MUR

The ERS = PW / PR

At an optimal bundle: MRS=ERS Rewritten we have:

– MUW / MUR = PW / PR

– MUW/PW = MUR/PR

– bang/buck in wheat = bang/buck in rice

Get same optimal bundle either way

Page 22: Consumer Theory

22

Handling a change in PW

Li wants to achieve the highest indifference curve that the budget constraints permit.

The points A, B, and C represents the best that Li can do at prices of $4, $2, and $1 for wheat.

The equation MRS=ERS is satisfied at each of the points.

Li's Demand for Wheat

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 5 10 15 20

Wheat

Ric

e

I2

I1

I0

4

2

1

CB

A

Page 23: Consumer Theory

23

Li’s Demand for Wheat

The table shows the amount of wheat that Li demands at each price.

These are the points of tangency from the previous slide.

Quantity Price Point6 4 A10 2 B16 1 C

Li's Demand for Wheat

Page 24: Consumer Theory

24

Graph of Li’s Demand for Wheat When we connect the

points from the table in the previous slide we get Li’s demand for wheat.

The points A, B, and C correspond to the tangencies of the budget constraint and the indifference curves.

Li's Demand for Wheat

0

1

2

3

4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

QuantityP

ric

e

A

B

C

Page 25: Consumer Theory

25

Li’s Best Choice Reconsidered

Consider the choice at PW=$2/lb. The point B is optimal. The point A is feasible but inferior to

all points on the red budget line between E and F.

The point C is preferred to B but cannot be purchased with Li’s $40 income at the given prices; it is above the red budget line.

The point E is feasible but Li prefers more wheat and less rice (B).

The point F is feasible but Li prefers less wheat and more rice (B, again).

There is no combination that Li prefers to B that she is able to buy.

Li's Best Choice of Wheat and Rice

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 5 10 15 20Wheat

Ric

e

I2

I1

I0

2A

E

F

BC

Page 26: Consumer Theory

26

Handling a change in PW

Li wants to achieve the highest indifference curve that the budget constraints permit.

The points A, B, and C represents the best that Li can do at prices of $4, $2, and $1 for wheat.

The equation MRS=ERS is satisfied at each of the points.

Li's Demand for Wheat

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 5 10 15 20

Wheat

Ric

e

I2

I1

I0

4

2

1

CB

A

Page 27: Consumer Theory

27

Li’s Demand for Wheat

The table shows the amount of wheat that Li demands at each price.

These are the points of tangency from the previous slide.

Quantity Price Point6 4 A10 2 B16 1 C

Li's Demand for Wheat

Page 28: Consumer Theory

28

Graph of Li’s Demand for Wheat When we connect the

points from the table in the previous slide we get Li’s demand for wheat.

The points A, B, and C correspond to the tangencies of the budget constraint and the indifference curves.

Li's Demand for Wheat

0

1

2

3

4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

QuantityP

ric

e

A

B

C

Page 29: Consumer Theory

29

Li's Demand for Wheat

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 5 10 15 20

Wheat

Ric

e

I2

I1

I0

4

2

1

CB

A

Li's Demand for Wheat

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

QuantityPr

ice

A

B

C

From IC Map to Li’s Demand for Wheat

Page 30: Consumer Theory

30

Income and Substitution Effects Economists decompose the effect of a change in price

on the quantity demanded into an income and a substitution effect.

Income effect: due to the increase in real income associated with a fall in prices (you can buy more with the same nominal income) or the loss of real income associated with a rise in prices (you cannot buy as much as you once did with the same nominal income).

Substitution effect: due to the change in the relative price of the good, cheaper goods are substituted for more expensive ones.

Page 31: Consumer Theory

31

Income and Substitution Effects: Price Decline, “X” normal

When the price of a good falls, the quantity demanded rises for two reasons.

The income effect: real income is higher because the same money income buys more at the lower prices. For normal goods, then, the income effect of a price fall is positive.

The substitution effect: consumers substitute the now cheaper good for ones whose price has not fallen, real income held constant. This increase in demand is called the substitution effect of a price decline.

Page 32: Consumer Theory

32

Li’s Income and Substitution Effects: Price Fall, Rice normal

Graph shows the income and substitution effects of the fall in the price of wheat from $4/lb. (A) to $1/lb. (C).

The movement from point A to point D is the substitution effect: Li buys less rice and more wheat, and would do so even if she had an income of only $20 (as the black budget line shows).

The movement from point D to point C is the income effect, the price decline is like giving Li an additional $20 of real income.

Li's Income and Substitution Effects

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 5 10 15 20Wheat

Ric

e

I2

I0

4

1

1

C

AD

Page 33: Consumer Theory

33

Li’s Substitution Effect The substitution effect is the amount by

which Li's wheat consumption increased holding real income constant.

Substitution effect is the difference between Li's consumption of wheat at the new and old prices holding her real income constant, that is, staying on the same indifference curve (compare points A and D).

Page 34: Consumer Theory

34

Li’s Income Effect When the price falls from $4/lb. of wheat to $1/lb. per

wheat, Li is able to buy both more wheat and more rice.

The income effect is the difference between what she would have bought on the old indifference curve at the lower wheat price (point D) and what she actually did buy with her nominal income ($40) at the lower price (point C).

Li increases her consumption of wheat and rice because of the increase in her real income from the price decline.

Page 35: Consumer Theory

35

General effect of a price fall

Income effect - you feel richer

“X” normal

Substitution EffectX now looks relatively cheaper

PX falls

Quantity demanded increases Quantity demanded increasesQuantity demanded decreases

Total effect is the substitution effect AND the income effect working at the same time.

“X” inferior

Page 36: Consumer Theory

36

From Individual to Market Demand

Market demand is the sum of all individual demands in the economy.

In the following example there are two consumers of wheat: Li and Juanita.

The market demand, then, is the sum of the quantities demand by Li and Juanita.

Page 37: Consumer Theory

37

Juanita’s Demand for Wheat Juanita’s income is also

$40. Juanita faces the same

price for rice as Li: $2/lb. Her preferences are

different from Li’s. Her demand for wheat is

derived in the figure at the left.

Juanita's Demand for Wheat

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 5 10 15 20

Wheat

Ric

e

I2

I1

I0

4

2

1

CBA

Page 38: Consumer Theory

38

Graph of Juanita’s Demand for Wheat

The points A, B and C correspond to Juanita’s best choices given her income and the three prices of wheat illustrated.

This is her demand curve for wheat.

Juanita's Demand for Wheat

0

1

2

3

4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

QuantityP

ric

e

A

B

C

Page 39: Consumer Theory

39

Market Demand The market demand (green)

is the sum of Li’s (blue) and Juanita’s (red) demand for wheat at each price.

At PW=4, Li demands 6 lbs., Juanita demands 5 lbs. and the market demand is 11 lbs.

At PW=2, Li and Juanita demand 10 lbs. and the market demand is 20 lbs.

At PW=1, Li demands 16 lbs., Juanita demands 18 lbs. and the market demand is 34 lbs.

Market for Wheat

0

1

2

3

4

0 20 40

Quantity of Wheat

Pri

ce

of

Wh

ea

t

Li's Demand

Juanita's Demand

Market Demand

Page 40: Consumer Theory

40

Application: Effect of a Tax & Transfer Program

Suppose I have the preferences illustrated at the right.

Question A:If Income = $16If Price of food = $1If Price of shelter = $1

Food = ?Shelter = ?Indifference curve = ?

Preferences

0123456789

10111213141516

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Food

Sh

elt

er

I4

I5

I6

I1

I2

I3

Page 41: Consumer Theory

41

Answer A Point A:

If Income = $16If Price of food = $1If Price of shelter = $1 Food = 7Shelter = 9Indifference curve = I4

Initial Point

0123456789

10111213141516

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Food

Sh

elt

er

I1

I2

I3

I4

I5

I6A

Page 42: Consumer Theory

42

Effect of a Tax and Transfer Program: Addition of Tax Question B:

If Income = $16If Price of food = $1If Price of shelter = $1 and Tax on shelter = 100%

Tax-inclusive price of shelter = ? Food = ?Shelter = ?Indifference curve = ?

Initial Point

0123456789

10111213141516

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Food

Sh

elt

er

I1

I2

I3

I4

I5

I6A

Page 43: Consumer Theory

43

Answer B Point B

If Income = $16If Price of food = $1If Price of shelter = $1 and Tax on shelter = 100%

Tax-inclusive price of shelter = 2Food = 9Shelter = 3.5Indifference curve = I2

Tax Only

0123456789

10111213141516

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Food

Sh

elt

er

I1

I2

I3

I4

I5

I6A

B

Page 44: Consumer Theory

44

Effect of a Tax and Transfer Program: Tax & Transfer Question C:

If Income = $16If Price of food = $1If Price of shelter = $1 and Tax on shelter = 100% andTransfer payment = $8

Food = ? Shelter = ? Indifference curve = ?

Tax Only

0123456789

10111213141516

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Food

Sh

elt

er

I1

I2

I3

I4

I5

I6A

B

Page 45: Consumer Theory

45

Answer C Point C

If Income = $16If Price of food = $1If Price of shelter = $1 and Tax on shelter = 100% andTransfer payment = $8

Food = 10Shelter = 7Indifference curve = I4

Tax and Transfer

0123456789

10111213141516

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Food

Sh

elt

er

I1

I2

I3

I4

I5

I6A

B

C

Page 46: Consumer Theory

46

Tax and Transfer Systems Give Pure Substitution Effects

Notice in the example that the consumer ends up on the same indifference curve after the tax and transfer program as in the initial choice (I4).

In public finance (the study of tax and transfer systems) this result usually occurs when the tax and transfer system is combined with a balanced budget.

In our example, tax receipts are $7 per person (= 7 units of shelter x $1 tax), while the transfer is $8 per person. This is as close to “balanced” as we can get and still be able to graph the consumer’s choice legibly.

Knowledge of the substitution effect of the price change induced by the shelter tax is sufficient to predict the effect of the complete tax and transfer system.

Page 47: Consumer Theory

47

Food Stamps vs. $$$$$ Suppose the following for the Parker family:

– u(F, $aog) where $aog=$all other goods

– I=$200

– PF = $2/unit

– Paog = $1

Consider three alternative government policies– no support– $200 in food stamps– $200 in cash

Page 48: Consumer Theory

48

Food Stamps vs. $$$$$

Food

$aog

BL0

IC0

IC1

Notes:– the budget line under the

food stamp program is the thick black segment and the purple segment

– The budget line with cash is the red and purple segments

– the Parkers are indifferent between food stamps and cash

100

200

200

Page 49: Consumer Theory

49

Food Stamps vs. $$$$$

Food

$aog

BL0

IC0

ICFS

IC$$

Notes:– the budget line under the

food stamp program is the thick black segment and the purple segment

– The budget line with cash is the red and purple segments

– if this is the case then the Parkers prefer cash to food stamps