content of the presentation

Expanded Public Work Programme: Expanded Public Work Programme:

Municipal Summit 2011 - Post Summit ReportMunicipal Summit 2011 - Post Summit Report

Portfolio Committee of Public WorksPortfolio Committee of Public Works

28 February 201228 February 2012

Content of the PresentationContent of the Presentation

2

Theme of the Summit

Purpose of the Summit

Key discussions at the Summit

Resolutions of the Summit 2011

Post Summit Engagements Progress per Province

Conclusion

3

Theme & Purpose of the Summit

4

Theme: “Accelerating towards the delivery of 4,5 million work opportunities for the poor”

The Summit was held on 2 - 4 November 2011, Gallagher Estate in Midrand

The purpose of the Summit 2011 was to: “Ensure increased job creation by municipalities in order to reach the 4,5 million work opportunities target and 2 million FTE target.”

Municipal Summit Theme & Purpose Municipal Summit Theme & Purpose

Content of the Municipal Summit 2011Content of the Municipal Summit 2011

5

Imparted technical knowledge and an understanding of the EPWP Phase 2, especially in the context of the new political principals elected into office in 2011.

Considered the progress against the 2010 Summit Resolutions.

Debated key policy principles of the EPWP within the context of job creation imperatives and the performance of the EPWP since 2009/10.

Considered best practice.

Garnered the support of political principals and technical staff in terms of the EPWP Phase 2 targets.

6

Key discussions at the Summit

Key issues discussed at the Summit… (2)Key issues discussed at the Summit… (2)

7

Increased number of reporting municipalities were noted by Chairperson of SALGA and the Free State MEC of Public Works, Ms Mabe.

However, the Northern Cape MEC of Roads and Public Works, Mr Dawid Rooi noted that under-reporting exists on the Programme in that 43 municipalities did not report in any sector in 2011/12 (i.e. in either quarter 1 or 2).

The Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee of Public Works noted that the Parliamentary Oversight visits have highlighted that municipalities have not identified suitably trained officials to implement the EPWP within the municipality.

Key issues discussed at the Summit… (3)Key issues discussed at the Summit… (3)

8

Municipalities requested DPW to expand and continue the provision of Technical Assistance to municipalities. This technical support should be to ensure that labour-intensity on projects are increased especially because the application of labour-intensive techniques can generate 3-5 times more employment than conventional infrastructure projects, as noted by the ILO Guest speaker, Dr Addo Abedi.

The Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee of Public Works noted there needs to be an increased focus on attaining the full time equivalent targets by ensuring that work opportunities are at least 100 days in duration.

Poor reporting in the Social Sector at municipal sphere was noted in the commissions i.e. only 12 municipalities reported in 2010/11. This has been attributed to a lack of understanding of the social sector programmes.

9

Resolutions of the Summit 2011

Municipal Summit Resolutions 2011…(1)Municipal Summit Resolutions 2011…(1)

10

1. The summit noted progress made in signing the protocols. All outstanding protocols should be signed by 31 March 2012.

2. The Summit noted progress made in the development of municipal EPWP policy endorsed by Councils at local, district and metro level – and resolved that all municipalities will develop and endorse policy on EPWP by June 2012.

3. The Summit resolved that municipalities will ensure that their Integrated Development Plans (IDPs) prioritise the EPWP approach and methodology in their projects in order to optimise the creation of work opportunities

4. The Summit resolved that municipalities will optimise their budgets to deliver on the EPWP across all sectors, and will use labour-intensive methods in the delivery of projects in order to promote the creation of work opportunities.


11

5. The Summit noted the progress made by three provinces in establishing District Forums, and encouraged all other provinces to establish such forums.

6. Best practices of developing policy will be shared with all municipalities.

7. The DPW will provide intensified, focused Technical Support across all EPWP sectors to optimize the implementation of EPWP.

8. The Summit supported the review of the integrated incentive models.


12

9. The Summit resolved that there is a need for strengthened relationships between, NPOs and municipalities to enhance implementation of the Non-State Sector.

10.The Summit resolves that there will be emphasis on the implementation of EPWP in municipalities.

11.Municipalities will use labour intensive methods in the delivery of projects in order to promote the creation of work opportunities.

12.Municipalities undertook to intensify reporting on work opportunities created on projects implemented.

13.The DPW will continue to develop and make available implementation manuals on EPWP.

13

Post Summit Engagements

1414

Post Summit Engagements – Protocols Signed…(1)Post Summit Engagements – Protocols Signed…(1) 26 more municipalities signed Protocols between 1 Nov 2011 – 24

February 2012. See table 1 (for pre-) and Table 2 (post-) and Summit signing status.

14 Protocols must still be signed out of 278. The following provinces have outstanding agreements: Gauteng: 1 Protocol (expect this agreement to be signed shortly) KwaZulu Natal: 12 Protocols (road shows to municipalities

underway, with an inter-departmental partnership between the Department of Transport, the Office of the Premier, Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs and National Department of Public Works)

Western Cape: 1 Protocol (The West Coast Municipality has been extensively consulted and will not be signing. The municipality has indicated that it will not sign because it has no MIG funds)

15

Municipal Protocols Signed – Progress at the time Municipal Protocols Signed – Progress at the time

of the of the Pre-SummiPre-Summit – 1 Nov 2011 t – 1 Nov 2011 Province No of

Muni’s Muni’s that have signed

Muni’s still to sign

% Muni’s that signed

Eastern Cape 45 44 1 98%Free State 24 23 1 96%Gauteng 12 9 3 75%Kwa-Zulu Natal 61 34 27 56%Limpopo 30 30 0 100%Mpumalanga 21 21 0 100%Northern Cape 32 30 2 94%

North West 23 20 3 87%Western Cape 30 27 3 90%Total 278 238 40 86%

16

Municipal Protocols Signed – Municipal Protocols Signed – PostPost – Summit all – Summit all

agreements signed by 24 Feb 2012 agreements signed by 24 Feb 2012

Province No of Muni’s

Muni’s that have signed

Muni’s still to sign

% Muni’s that signed

Muni’s still to Sign

Eastern Cape 45 45 0 100%

Free State 24 24 0 100%

Gauteng 12 11 1 92%CoJ MetroKwa-Zulu Natal 61 49 12 80%Ugu DM, Vulamehlo, Umzumbe,

uMuziwabantu , eMadlanugeni, Dannhauser, Ulundi, Hlabisa Mtubatuba, Mbonambi, Nkandla , Maphumulo

Limpopo 30 30 0 100% Mpumalanga 21 21 0 100% Northern Cape 32 32 0 100% North West 23 23 0 100% Western Cape 30 29 1 97%West Coast LMTotal 278 264 14 95%

17

Municipal Performance in 2009-10Municipal Performance in 2009-10 2009-10

Infrastructure E & C Social Total - Reported

Prov WO FTE WO FTE WO FTE WO FTE

EC 16,415 4,078 34 10.7 16,449 4,089

FS 2,493 827 279 26.7 943 69 3,715 923

GP 56,426 20,483 1,964 509.7 498 140 58,888 21,133

KN 28,455 8,705 3,671 422 32,126 9,127

LP 7,303 2,603 134 27.8 7,437 2,631

MP 3,373 604 186 48.5 3,559 652

NC 2,047 967 2,047 967

NW 5,656 1,526 5,656 1,526

WC 5,054 1,000 1,457 146.1 275 31 6,786 1,177

Total 127,222 40,793 4,054 769.6 5,387 662 136,663 42,225

18

Municipal Performance in 2010-11Municipal Performance in 2010-11

2010-11

Infrastructure E & C Social Total


EC 24,676 4,839 5,901 1,292 49 45 30,626 6,176

FS 5,397 1,969 553 184 52 45 6,002 2,199

GP 50,674 15,414 4,963 3,018 902 689 56,539 19,121

KN 21,555 5,981 236 26 56 39 21,847 6,046

LP 7,565 2,200 1,675 706 9,240 2,907

MP 5,404 1,392 644 162 6,048 1,554

NC 3,556 560 265 26 3,821 586

NW 6,097 1,595 402 66 34 7 6,533 1,669

WC 12,451 2,670 4,733 774 2,119 351 19,303 3,795

Total 137,375 36,621 19,372 6,255 3,212 1,177 159,959 44,053

19

Municipal Performance in 2011-12 – Up to Quarter 3Municipal Performance in 2011-12 – Up to Quarter 3

2010-11

Infrastructure E & C Social Total


EC 28,192 5,375 8,219 1,515 92 35 36,503 6,924FS 6,076 1,768 2,797 672 105 12 8,978 2,452GP 27,313 10,071 7,049 2,619 3,270 1,011 37,632 13,702KN 16,116 3,863 2,298 783 179 88 18,593 4,734LP 11,435 2,084 2,342 750 5 2 13,782 2,835MP 6,421 1,979 2,373 602 43 12 8,837 2,594NC 1,723 291 1,552 274 0 0 3,275 565NW 5,564 1,819 1,199 404 0 0 6,763 2,223WC 16,542 3,546 9,478 1,830 1,295 209 27,315 5,585Total 119,382 30,797 37,307 9,448 4,989 1,369 161,678 41,614

Eastern Cape Province – 45 municipalitiesEastern Cape Province – 45 municipalities

20

• Reporting by municipalities have progressively increased:• 2009/10: Only 23 municipalities reported• 2010/11: 42 municipalities reported. The following 3 municipalities

did not report in 2009/10 and 2010/11: Great Kei, Nxuba and Sunday’s River Valley

• 2011/12 (3rd quarter): All 45 municipalities reported

• Collectively the municipalities within EC are reaching their work opportunity target, however, performance on the FTEs are a concern.

Eastern CapeTotal Reported Total - Target

% Reported Progress against Target

WO FTE WO FTE WO FTE2009/10 16,449 4,089 28,559 9,779 58% 42%

2010/11 30,626 6,176 32,557

11,735 94% 53%2011/12 (3rd quarter) 36,503 6,924 41,886

15,334 87% 45%

Total 83,578 17,189 103,003 36,849 81% 47%

Free State Province – 24 municipalitiesFree State Province – 24 municipalities

21

• Reporting by municipalities have progressively increased:• 2009/10: Only 10 municipalities reported• 2010/11: 22 municipalities reported. • 2011/12 (3rd quarter): 23 municipalities reported

• In order to meet the overall targets, there will be improved focus on the no. of work opportunities being reported per municipality. There is now constant feedback to Municipal Managers.

Free StateTotal Reported Total - Target

% Reported Progress against

TargetWO FTE WO FTE WO FTE

2009/10 3,715 923 11,661 3,993 32% 23%

2010/11 6,002 2,199

13,294 4,792 45% 46%

2011/12 (3rd quarter) 8,978 2,452

17,103

6,261 52% 39%

Total 18,695 5,574 42,058 15,046 44% 37%

Gauteng Province – 12 municipalitiesGauteng Province – 12 municipalities

22


• WO and FTE Targets are being met.

Gauteng

Total Reported Total - Target



2010/11 56,539 19,121 36,712

13,233 154% 144%

2011/12 (3rd quarter) 37,632 13,702

47,232

17,291 80% 79%

Total 153,059 53,956 116,149 41,552 132% 130%

KwaZulu Natal Province – 61 municipalitiesKwaZulu Natal Province – 61 municipalities

23


• Partnership between Office of the Premier, COGTA, Dept of Transport and NDPW to improve the reporting by municipalities.

KwaZulu NatalTotal Reported Total - Target



2010/11 21,847 6,046 43,549

15,697 50% 39%

2011/12 (3rd quarter) 18,593 4,734

56,027

20,511 33% 23%

Total 72,566 19,907 137,777 49,289 53% 40%

Limpopo Province – 30 municipalitiesLimpopo Province – 30 municipalities

24


• No of work opportunities being reported per municipality is low. To be addressed through constant feedback to the municipality and technical support.

LimpopoTotal Reported Total - Target



2009/10 7,437 2,631 22,066 7,556 34% 35%

2010/11 9,240 2,907

25,155 9,067 37% 32%

2011/12 (3rd quarter) 13,782 2,835

32,363

11,848 43% 24%

Total 30,459 8,373 79,584 28,471 38% 29%

Mpumalanga Province – 21 municipalitiesMpumalanga Province – 21 municipalities

25

• Reporting by municipalities have progressively increased:• 2009/10: 20 municipalities reported• 2010/11: 21 municipalities reported. • 2011/12 (3rd quarter): 21 municipalities reported

• Reporting staring to improve due to increased participation in the E&C sector. District Steering Committee’s are being formed.

Mpumalanga

Total Reported Total - Target


Target

WO FTE WO FTE WO FTE

2009/10 3,559 652 12,212 4,182 29% 16%

2010/11 6,048 1,554

13,922 5,018 43% 31%

2011/12 (3rd quarter) 8,837 2,594

17,911

6,557 49% 40%

Total 18,444 4,800 44,045 15,757 42% 30%

Northern Cape Province – 32 municipalitiesNorthern Cape Province – 32 municipalities

26


• Increased no of municipalities reporting. No of work opportunities reported per sector is low. District Steering Committee’s have been formed.

Northern CapeTotal Reported Total - Target


WO FTE WO FTE WO FTE2009/10 2,047 967 4,698 1,609 44% 60%

2010/11 3,821 586

5,356 1,930 71% 30%

2011/12 (3rd quarter) 3,275 565

6,890

2,522 48% 22%

Total 9,143 2,118 16,944 6,061 54% 35%

North West Province – 23 municipalitiesNorth West Province – 23 municipalities

27

• Reporting by municipalities have progressively increased:• 2009/10: 15 municipalities reported• 2010/11: 22municipalities reported. • 2011/12 (3rd quarter): 19 municipalities reported

• No of work opportunities reported per sector is low. District Steering Committee’s has been formed in Bojanala DM.

North WestTotal Reported Total - Target



2010/11 6,533 1,669 16,282

5,869 40% 28%

2011/12 (3rd quarter) 6,763 2,223

20,948

7,669 32% 29%

Total 18,952 5,418 51,513 18,428 37% 29%

Western Cape Province – 30 municipalitiesWestern Cape Province – 30 municipalities

28


• District Steering Committee’s are critical in the performance of the municipalities.

Western CapeTotal Reported Total - Target



2009/10 6,786 1,177 11,523 3,946 59% 30%

2010/11 19,303 3,795

13,137 4,735 147% 80%

2011/12 (3rd quarter) 27,315 5,585

16,901

6,187 162% 90%

Total 53,404 10,557 41,561 14,868 128% 71%

Overall Summary – Municipalities against Overall Summary – Municipalities against

targetstargets

29

All ProvincesTotal Reported Total - Target



2010/11 159,959 44,053 199,963 72,077 80% 61%2011/12 (3rd quarter) 161,678 41,614 257,262 94,180 63% 44%Total 458,300 127,892 632,632 226,321 72% 57%


• District Steering Committee’s are critical in the performance of the municipalities.

3030

Conclusion..(1)Conclusion..(1) Generic EPWP Municipal Policy Guidelines (Resolution 2) has been

developed by DPW. Consultations underway with Provinces. Saldanha Bay LM, Nelson Mandela Metro, Stellenbosch LM, eThekwini Metro, City of Johannesburg have approved Municipal Policy.

Data capturing (30 data capturers) assistance provided to provinces to address under-reporting by DPW: EC – 5, FS – 3, GP – 4, KZ – 5, LP – 3, MP – 2, NC – 2, NW – 2, WC – 3)

Since the Municipal Summit District Steering Committee’s (Resolution 5) have been formed in: Ehlanzeni District (Mpumalanga Province) Sisonke District (KwaZulu Natal Province) Bojanala District (North West Province) Eastern Cape, Western Cape and Northern Cape have District

Steering Committees in all Districts. All other provinces in a planning phase

3131

Conclusion… (2)Conclusion… (2) The following studies have been developed to assist municipalities

(Resolution 6: Development of Best Practice) Vuk’uphile Contractor study (completed Feb 2012) Non-State Sector study (December 2012) Cross-sectional study (Finalising consultation) Environment & Culture Sector Profiling (Feb 2012) Food for Waste Model Document (Oct 2011) Case Study for Food for Waste Studies (October 2011)

EPWP integrated Incentive Grant Model (infrastructure and environment & culture) has been reviewed and finalised. (Resolution 8: Revision of the Incentive Model)

967 (NQF 5) and 161 (NQF 7) out of the targeted 1000 municipal officials trained on labour intensive methods. (Resolution 11: Increased application of labour-intensive techniques).

DPW is finalising technical support plans to municipalities. Finalising in March 2012.

3232

Thank-you.

Stanley W. Henderson

DDG:EPWP

Cell: 083 6765119

012-310-5110

Email: [email protected]

content of the presentation

Documents