content_emigration of skilled labour is good for ukraine's economy
TRANSCRIPT
Foundation for Effective Governance Ukraine, Kiev, 23-F Kudryavskaya Str., tel: +380 44 501 41 00, fax: + 380 44 501 41 05
[email protected] www.feg.org.ua, www.debaty.org
Emigration of skilled labour is good for Ukraine's economy
A high quality labour force is a necessary condition for economic growth.
Therefore the flight of qualified labour abroad is traditionally considered to be a
big problem for developing countries as they lose talented people with key skills to
countries offering improved salaries and lifestyles. Yet, in the age of globalization
another approach concerning „brain drain‟ issue has emerged: emigration of skilled
labor can lead to substantial benefits to the original countries they have emigrated
from, such as Ukraine. Nowadays, countries can develop not only with the help of
the domestic human capital but by effectively managing their human resources
abroad as well.
“Brain drain” is
traditionally considered to be
a threat to a country‟s
economic development. Yet
potential benefits of
emigration are usually not
taken into account
So can Ukraine‟s economy benefit from the emigration of talent? Should the
country encourage emigration and focus on increasing the effectiveness of its
interaction with emigrants, or concentrate instead on keeping its talented workers
here in inside the country?
Arguments FOR the motion
Having left for a foreign country, highly qualified professionals will contribute to
the future influx of investments, technologies, ideas, and higher and more effective
standards of doing business in their homeland. The departure of talented people
abroad gives them a chance to find a better match for their abilities, to accumulate
financial resources and to establish business contacts they are unlikely to gain in
their own country. As a result, returning home later, they bring greater benefits to
Ukraine, and the country will have to spend much less on creating conditions for
talent development. Moreover, the temporary departure of students and scholars to
participate in research projects increases the skills of local scientists and helps to
integrate Ukraine into the world science and education community.
Having left the country,
talents can return with new
knowledge, skills and
resources
They also facilitate the promotion of domestic goods and services on the global
market. Having preserved their business contacts from home and gained access to
foreign markets resources, emigrants with their contacts and reputation serve as a
useful link between domestic producers and foreign consumers. For example,
Indians working in Silicon Valley contributed significantly to the infiltration of
Indian IT companies into the US market.
Emigrants promote national
goods and services on the
global market and showcase
their mother country
The opportunity to emigrate spurs the development of a local labor market.
Ukrainians are motivated to get an internationally competitive education so they
can find a job abroad. Not all of them will eventually leave their own country;
some will stay, adding to the number of highly qualified experts in the country‟s
economy and science departments. Furthermore, threatened by “brain drain” issue,
employers are pushed to constantly develop and improve working conditions to
attract and maintain personnel.
The opportunity to emigrate
encourages people to get a
better education and makes
national employers improve
their working conditions
Foundation for Effective Governance Ukraine, Kiev, 23-F Kudryavskaya Str., tel: +380 44 501 41 00, fax: + 380 44 501 41 05
[email protected] www.feg.org.ua, www.debaty.org
Arguments AGAINST the motion
Emigration of highly qualified specialists depletes human capital. A vicious circle
is created, when each consequent generation has to learn from people with lower
and lower qualifications. As a result, the country‟s productivity falls and its
competitiveness in attraction of investments into high-tech industries decreases. In
this situation, the economy gets locked in low value added good production. If a
country loses a critical mass of highly educated and active population, it gets into a
spiral of degrading labor force and production, and will need much greater
resources to reverse the process and persuade talented people to return to their
country of origin.
„Brain drain‟ leads to
degradation of a country‟s
human capital and economic
potential
The deficit of skilled labor spurred by emigration increases hiring costs for
domestic companies, many of which experience difficulties in finding qualified
professionals and have themselves to attract people from abroad. It increases the
costs of goods and services, making them less competitive on the global market.
Moreover, the skill deficit in public administration lowers the effectiveness of
public service and hinders the process of reforms.
The deficit of personnel
increases costs and hampers
the process of economic
reforms
Countries spend a great deal of money on creating medical, educational and
scientific infrastructures to foster a high-quality national labor force. Ukraine
spends about one third of its budget on these kinds of social expenses. If highly
qualified specialists, who developed in the country with the help of state support,
leave for other countries, the country cannot capitalize on its investments, other
economies will enjoy the fruits of its labors.
The country fails to
capitalize on its investments
into human capital
The issue of the potential benefits for Ukraine from emigration of highly qualified personnel will be discussed
at a public debate hosted by the Foundation for Effective Governance in partnership with Britain-based
Intelligence Squared on September 22, 2011 in Kyiv, Ukraine.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Some facts on professional migration
Foreign nationals are owners of the majority of patent applications in some of the largest US companies,
e.g. 64% at GE and 60% at Cisco (Global Talent Risk, WEF with BCG, 2011).
The global estimated remittance flows sent by migrants in 2010 reached $440bn, including $53bn to India
and $51bn to China (highest) as well as around $5 bn to Ukraine (Migration and Development Brief, World
Bank, 2011).
In the first half of the 2000s the number of Chinese student who left to study abroad remained high (over
100 ths a year) while only around 25% of those returned (by Sciencenet.cn, 2011). However, in 2009 the
number of overseas-returned Chinese exceeded 100 ths for the first time. Now about 81% of researchers in
the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 54% of the academicians in the Chinese Academy of Engineering and
72% of the chief scientists in 863 Chinese programs are professionals who studied abroad and returned
home (All-China Federation of Returned Overseas Chinese, 2010).
The number of specialists with scientific degrees who officially leaving Ukraine falls by approximately 1.5
every two years since the end of 1990 (The State Committee of Statistics, 2009).
Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, who left USSR/Russia in 1990‟s, earned the Nobel Prize in
Physics in 2010.