contestable market theory
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/6/2019 Contestable Market Theory
1/12
Contestable Market Theory
(An Overview)by
Robert R. Ebert. Ph.D.
Professor of Economics
Baldwin-Wallace College
Copyright 2003 Robert R. Ebert
-
8/6/2019 Contestable Market Theory
2/12
Contestable Markets The Questions:
How much rivalry exists in markets?
Is the number of firms in a market a good measure ofindustry rivalry?
Contestable Market Theory:
Suggests that under certain conditions, markets with
just a few firms can yield results with the sameeconomic welfare effects as perfect competition
i.e., rivals in the markets can attain both productive and
allocative efficiency.
-
8/6/2019 Contestable Market Theory
3/12
General Micro Theory
Assumption Standard models of imperfect competition
(monopoly, oligopoly, monopolistic
competition)
Competition is limited and impeded
Entry is limited
Firms are price makers Firms have some degree of market power
-
8/6/2019 Contestable Market Theory
4/12
Perfectly Contestable MarketsA market which achieves an equilibrium
that protects it from entry of new firms
Prices must be set at P = MC
Does not depend on number of firms in the
industry
Key factor is firms price in such a way as toward off entry
-
8/6/2019 Contestable Market Theory
5/12
Perfectly Contestable Markets
(conditions necessary for)
Entry is absolutely free and exit is costless Does not mean there is no expense at entry
Does mean a new entrant suffers no
disadvantage in terms of productive technique
or product quality relative to established firm
-
8/6/2019 Contestable Market Theory
6/12
Perfectly Contestable Markets
(conditions necessary for, contd.) Potential entrants evaluate profitability
in terms of established firms pre-entry
prices Freedom of exit means firms can leave
without impediment
In the process of departure, can recoupany costs incurred in the entry process For example, all capital is salable or reusable
without loss other than costs associated withnormal use and depreciation
Thus, any risk of entry is eliminated
-
8/6/2019 Contestable Market Theory
7/12
Perfectly Contestable Markets
The Critical Feature
Critical Feature is vulnerability to hit-
and-run entry
Even a transient profit would not be
neglected by a potential entrant
A new entrant could go in, and beforeprices change, collect gains and then exit
the market without cost before the climate
turns hostile
-
8/6/2019 Contestable Market Theory
8/12
Perfectly Contestable Markets
(PCM)
and Economic Welfare
A PCM never offers more than a normal rate of
profit Because of hit-and-run entry, economic profits must
be zero, even if it is an oligopoly or monopoly
Any positive profit means a transient entrant can set up
business and undercut the established firms price and stillearn a profit
There is an absence of inefficiency in a PCM
Any unnecessary cost constitutes an invitation to
entry
-
8/6/2019 Contestable Market Theory
9/12
Perfectly Contestable Markets
(PCM)
and Economic Welfare (contd.)
Predatory pricing not possible i.e. price cannot be below MC
If P < MC; invites entry
New entrant sells less but at a lower price
-
8/6/2019 Contestable Market Theory
10/12
Perfectly Contestable Markets (PCM)
and Economic Welfare
P > MC (like at PE) not
possible;
New entrants compete themarket away
P < MC irrational
New entrant lowers price and takes part of market
Operates at Qz where P' = MR = MC
Existing firm retaliates and lowers price to below P'
Price war drives firm out
AC
D
MC
MR
PE
P'
P < MC
QE
QZ
QY
. ... D
-
8/6/2019 Contestable Market Theory
11/12
Perfectly Contestable Markets
Policy Implications
Number of firms in the industry is not a good
measure of either market power or competition Deviations from classical competitive norm need
not prevent invisible hand from working if hit-
and-run entry exists
Absence of entry may be a virtue, not a vice if P = MC (allocative efficiency)
if productive efficiency achieved
-
8/6/2019 Contestable Market Theory
12/12
Perfectly Contestable Markets
Policy Implications
Policy should aim to reduce entry costs to
stimulate potential competition Government tax incentives/subsidies to bear
sunk costs Government actually operate certain facilities (ex.
airports) Rapid depreciation and tax benefits for new
investment in tooling