continuous topological defects in 3 he-a in a slab
DESCRIPTION
Andrei Golov:. Trapping of vortices by a network of topological defects in superfluid 3 He-A. Continuous topological defects in 3 He-A in a slab Models for the critical velocity and pinning (critical states). Vortex nucleation and pinning (intrinsic and extrinsic): - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Continuous topological defects in 3He-A in a slab
Models for the critical velocity and pinning (critical states).
Vortex nucleation and pinning (intrinsic and extrinsic):
- Uniform texture: intrinsic nucleation and weak extrinsic pinning
- Texture with domain walls: intrinsic nucleation and strong universal pinning
Speculations about the networks of domain walls
P.M.Walmsley, D.J.Cousins, A.I.Golov Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 225301 (2003) Critical velocity of continuous vortex nucleation in a slab of superfluid 3He-A
P.M.Walmsley, I.J.White, A.I.Golov Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 195301 (2004) Intrinsic pinning of vorticity by domain walls of l-texture in superfluid 3He-A
Trapping of vortices by a network of topological defects in superfluid 3He-A
Andrei Golov:
3He-A: order parameter
vs
vs
l dp-wave, spin triplet Cooper pairs
Two anisotropy axes:
l - direction of orbital momentum
d - spin quantization axis (s.d)=0
Continuous vorticity: large length scale Discrete degeneracy: domain walls
l
nm
γ
β
αOrder parameter: 6 d.o.f.:
Aμj=∆(T)(mj+inj)dµ
Velocity of flow depends on 3 d.o.f.: vs = -ħ(2m3)-1(∇γ+cosβ∇α)
Groundstates, vortices, domain walls:
(slab geometry, small H and vs)
=0 vs=0
>0
vs>0
>0
Topological defects (textures)
Azimuthal component of superflow
Two-quantum vortex
Vortex and wall can be either dipole-locked or unlocked
Rcore~ 0.2D
(lz, dz)=
Domain walls
Vortices in bulk 3He-A(Equilibrium phase diagram, Helsinki data)
LV2similar to CUV except d = l(narrow range of small )
dl-wall
l-wall
ATC-vortex (dl)
ATC-vortex (l)
When l is free to rotate:
Hydrodynamic instability at
Soft core radius Rcore vs. D and H :
♦ H = 0 : Rcore ∼ D → vc ∝ D-1
♦ 2-4 G < H < 25 G : Rcore ∼ ξH ∝ H-1 → vc ∝ H
♦ H > 25 G : Rcore ∼ ξd = 10 μm → vc∼1 mm/s
HF=2-4 G
vc
H
vd~1 mm/s
Hd≈25 G
vc∝D-1vc∝H
vc∼vd
Models for vc (intrinsic processes)
When l is aligned with v (Bhattacharyya, Ho, Mermin 1977):
Instability of v-aligned l-texture: at
or
Rcore2m
v3
c
ħ
mm/s12 3
=Dm
v
ħc
(Feynman 1955, et al…)
lz=+1dz=-1
lz=+1dz=+1
lz=-1dz=-1
lz=-1dz=+1
d-wall
dl-walll-walllz=+1dz=-1
lz=+1dz=+1
lz=-1dz=+1
lz=-1dz=-1
orGroundstate (choice of four)
Multidomain texture(metastable)
(obtained by cooling at H=0 while rotating)
(obtained by cooling while stationary)
Also possible:
d-walls only dl-walls only
(obtained by cooling at H=0 while rotating)
(obtained by cooling while stationary)
lz=+1dz=+1
lz=-1dz=-1
lz=+1dz=+1
lz=+1dz=-1
Fredericksz transition (flow driven 2nd order textural transition)
0.0 0.5 1.00.0
0.5
1.0
v c / v
FH / H
F
vF = FR
Orienting forces: - Boundaries favour l perpendicular to walls (“uniform texture”, UT)- Magnetic field H favours l (via d) in plane with walls (“planar”, PT)- Superflow favours l tends to be parallel to vs (“azimuthal”, AT)
Theory (Fetter 1977):
vF
122
HF
Hv vF ~ D-1 HF ~ D-1
2 walls
Ways of preparing textures
vortices
uniform
rotation
azimuthal
domain walls
rotation
planar uniform
H
Initialpreparation
Uniform l-texture: cooling through Tc while rotating:
NtoA (moderate density of domain walls): cooling through Tc at = 0
BtoA (high density of domain walls): warming from B-phase at = 0
Applying rotation, > F, H = 0: makes azimuthal textures
Applying H > HF at 0: makes planar texture,
then > F: two dl-walls on demand
Rotating at > vcR introduces vortices
Value of vc and type of vortices depend on texture (with or without domain walls)
Rotating torsional oscillator
Disk-shaped cavity, D = 0.26 mm or 0.44 mm, R=5.0 mm
The shifts in resonant frequency vR ~ 650 Hz and bandwidth vB ~ 10 mHz tell about texture
Rotation produces continuous counterflow v = vn - vs
H
Vs Vs Vs
Normal Texture
Azimuthal Texture
Textures with defects
Because s < s we can distinguish:
0 rvs = 0
vn= rv
0 r
vn= rvvs = 0
Principles of vortex detection
Superfluid circulation Nκ :vs(R) = Nκ(2πR)-1N vortices
Rotating normal component :vn(R) = R
Rotation
If counterflow | vn - vs | exceeds vF ,texture tips azimuthally
TO detection of counterflow
Main observables
F
c
1. Hysteresis due to vc > 0 2. Hysteresis due to pinning
-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
BtoAD = 0.26 mm
R (
mH
z)
(rad/s)
1)2)3)4)
vs or vs
Hysteresis due to pinning
no pinning
weak, vp< vc
Horizontal scale set by c = vc /R
Vertical scale set by trap = vp /R
trap
c
c
2c max
vs
strong, vp> vc
?
Strong pinning: trap = c
Because trap can’t exceed c
(otherwise antivortex nucleates)
Uniform texture, positive rotation (H = 0)
Four fitting parameters:
F c R-Rc
D = 0.26 mm: R - Rc = 0.30 ± 0.10 mm
D = 0.44 mm: R - Rc = 0.35 ± 0.10 mm
Vortices nucleate at ~ D from edge
F
c
0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.000.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
D = 0.26 mm
v c (m
m/s
)
T / Tc
D = 0.44 mm
vc = cR
vc = 4vF ~ D-1, in agreement with vc∼ħ(2m3ac)-1
Critical velocity vs. core radius
Adapted from U. Parts et al., Europhys. Lett. 31, 449 (1995)
10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105100
101
102
103
104
105
106
vc = / (2R
core)
3He-AH = 0
3He-AH >H
d
3He-B
4He
v c /
(mm
-1)
Rcore
(nm)
10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105100
101
102
103
104
105
106
vc = / (2R
core)
3He-AH >H
d
3He-B
4He
v c /
(mm
-1)
Rcore
(nm)
Uniform texture, weak pinning
-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5-0.012
-0.010
-0.008
-0.006
-0.004
-0.002
0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
c
- = 0.06 rad/s
(vc
-= 0.3 mm/s)
-
saturated = -0.0092 rad/s
(N-
trapped = 11)
c
+ = 0.10 rad/s
(vc
+= 0.5 mm/s)
+
saturated = 0.0046 rad/s
(N+
trapped = 5)
D = 0.26 mm
pers (
rad
/s)
prep
(rad/s)
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
Nu
mb
er
of t
wo
-qu
an
ta v
ort
ice
s
Uniform texture, weak pinning
-0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10-0.002
-0.001
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
Good texture
N = (2/)R
2
R = 5 mm
pers (
rad
/s)
prep
(rad/s)
-3
-1
1
3
5
7
9
11
Nu
mb
er
of q
ua
nta
of c
ircu
latio
n, N
Handful of pinned vortices
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
Re
son
an
t fre
qu
en
cy s
hift
(m
Hz)
(rad/s)
(rad/s) before sweep:
0.000 -0.002 -0.005 -0.007 -0.009 -0.011
2 4 6 80
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Nu
mb
er
of
Eve
nts
Quantum number N
D=0.44mm
When no pinned vortices leftCan tell the orientation of l-texture
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
Fre
qu
en
cy S
hift
(m
Hz)
|| (rad/s)
Positive Negative
One MH vortex with one quantum of circulation
Negative rotation: strange behaviour
-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
-0.020
-0.015
-0.010
-0.005
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020Order:1) 2) 3) 4) 5)
pers (
rad
/s)
prep
(rad/s)
(only for D = 0.44mm)
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
B (
mH
z)
(rad/s)
Acceleration Deceleration
Vc
Vc1Vc2
D (mm) V+c V-c V-c1 V-c2 Vc(walls) (mm/s)0.26 0.5 0.3 -- -- 0.20.44 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.2
No hysteresis!
c
F
0 5 10 15 20 25 300.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
two domain walls v
c, 0.26 mm
vc, 0.44 mm
v c (m
m/s
)
H (Gauss)
Bulk dl-wall (theory: Kopu et al. Phys. Rev. B (2000))
0 5 10 15 20 25 300.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
uniform azimuthal v
c, 0.26 mm
vc, 0.44 mm
v c (m
m/s
)
H (Gauss)
What difference will two dl-walls make?Critical velocity:
Just two dl-walls: pinning in field
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.0250 5 10 15 20 25
Magnetic Field (Gauss)
pers (
rad/
s)
Good texture
N2
0
= 2R2pers
/20
0
5
10
15
20
25
N2
0 [num
ber
of
two
-qua
ntu
m v
ortic
es]
0 5 10 15 20 250.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
vc (vortex nucleation)
vF (Freedericksz tr.)
F
HF
(r
ad/s
)
Magnetic Field (Gauss)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8 V
elo
city
[ v
=
R] (
mm
/s)
Three times as much vorticity pinned on a domain wall at H=25 G than in uniform texture at H=0.
Other possible factors:
- Pinning in field might be stronger (vortex core shrinks with field).
- Different types of vortices in weak and strong fields.AT
UT PT
Vortices
D=0.26mm
0 5 10 15 20 25 300.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 NtoA, D = 0.44 mm BtoA, D = 0.44 mm
v c (m
m/s
)
H (Gauss)
0 5 10 15 20 25 300.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
v c (m
m/s
)
H (Gauss)
Theory: bulk l-wall
Theory: bulk dl-wall(Kopu et al, PRB 2000)
D = 0.44 mm
D = 0.26 mm
With many walls in magnetic field: vc
0 5 10 15 20 25 300.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
v c (m
m/s
)
H (Gauss)
NtoA after rotation in field H >Hd: l–walls
Trapped vorticity
-0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06
0
2
4
6
trap
Uniform
(rad/s)
0
2
4
6
trap
trap
NtoA
B
(m
Hz)
0
2 trap
trap
BtoA
In textures with domain walls: total circulation of ~ 50 0 of both directions can be trapped after stopping rotation
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
N to A
tra
p (ra
d/s
)Time (hours)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Nu
mbe
r o
f ci
rcla
tion
qu
an
ta
vs(R) = Nκ0(2πR)-1, trap = vs/R
vs
Pinning by networks of walls
-0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
c= 0.03 rad/s
(vc= 0.15 mm/s)
trap
= 0.03 rad/s
trap
(ra
d/s)
prep
(rad/s)
NtoA, 0.44 mm BtoA, 0.44 mm NtoA, 0.26 mm BtoA, 0.26 mm
Strong pinning: single parameter vc :
c = vc /R trap = vc/R
Web of domain walls
vs. pinning due to extrinsic inhomogeneities (grain boundaries or roughness of container walls)
Intrinsic pinning in chiral superconductors
In chiral superconductors, such as Sr2RuO4, UPt3 or PrOs4Sb12,vortices can be trapped by domain walls between differently oriented ground states [Sigrist, Agterberg 1999, Matsunaga et al. 2004]
Anomalously slow creep and strong pining of vortices are observed as well as history dependent density of domain walls (zero-field vs field-cooled) [Dumont, Mota 2002]
Trapping of vorticity by defects of order parameter is intrinsic pinning
3-wall junctions might play a role of pinning centres
dl-walll-walld-wall
can carry vorticity
++ (lz=+1, dz=+1)
+- (lz=+1, dz=-1)
-+ (lz=-1, dz=+1)
-- (lz=-1, dz=-1)
Energy of domain walls
0 20 40 60 80 1000
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
dl-wall
d-wall
l-wall
Fre
e E
nerg
y F D
2 / s||
Slab Thickness D/D
D=0.26mm D=0.44mm
Web of domain walls
dl-walll-walld-wall
can carry vorticity
++ (lz=+1, dz=+1)
+- (lz=+1, dz=-1)
-+ (lz=-1, dz=+1)
-- (lz=-1, dz=-1)
Edl = El = Ed
Edl << El Ed
(expected for D >> ξd = 10 μm )
dl
d
l
dll
d
What if only dl-walls?
To be metastable, need pinning on surface roughness
dl-wall
++ (lz=+1, dz=+1)
-- (lz=-1, dz=-1)
E.g. the backbone of vortex sheet in Helsinki experiments
No metastability in long cylinder
Then vortices could be trapped too
Summary
In 3He-A, we studied dynamics of continuous vortices in different l-textures.
Critical velocity for nucleation of different vortices observed and explained as intrinsic processes (hydrodynamic instability).
Strong pinning of vorticity by multidomain textures is observed. The amount of trapped vorticity is fairly universal.
General features of vortex nucleation and pinning are understood. However, some mysteries remain.
The 2-dimensional 4-state mosaic looks like a rich and tractable system. We have some experimental insight into it. Theoretical input is in demand.
Unpinning by Magnus force Annihilation with antivortex
In experiment, vp = min (vM, vc)(i.e. the critical velocity is capped by vc)
Unpinning mechanisms
FM
v
v > vMv > vc
to remove an existing vortex (vM) or to create an antivortex (vc)?
Pinning potential is quantified by “Magnus velocity” vM= Fp /s0D(such that Magnus force on a vortex FM = sD0v equals pinning force Fp )
Weak pinning, vM < vc Strong pinning, vM > vc
Model of strong pinning
All vortices are pinned forever
Maximum pers is limited to c
due to the creation of antivortices
vc
vc
vc
vp
vp
vc*
*
*
1) No pinning vp = 0
Cryostat rotatingW > 2Wc
2) Weak pinning 0 < vp < vc
3) Strong pinning vc < vp
Cryostat stationaryW = 0
vn
vs
n
Two models of critical state
1. Pinning force on a vortex Fp equals Magnus force FM= (sD0) v
2. Counterflow velocity v equals vc (nucleation of antivortices)
In superconductors, vp (Bean-Levingston barrier) is small but flux lines can not nucleate in volume,hence superconductors are normally in the pinning-limited regime |v| = vp even though vc< vp .
If vc< vp (strong pinning), |v| = vc
If vc > vp (weak pinning), |v| = vp
vp=Fp/ s0 D
strong, vp> vc
trap
c
c
2c max
no pinning
weak, vp< vc
two critical parameters: vc and vp (because Magnus force ~ vs):
(anti)vortices can nucleate anywhere when |vn-vs| > vc
existing vortices can move when |vn-vs| > vp
-0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4-0.04
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
trap
= 0.005 rad/s
trap
= 0.03 rad/s
c= 0.10 rad/s (v
c=0.5 mm/s)
c= 0.03 rad/s (v
c=0.15 mm/s)
N, 0.26mm N, 0.40mm
B, 0.26mm B, 0.40mm
- cooled
tr
ap (
rad
/s)
max
(rad/s)
Trapping by different textures
domain walls
rotation
planar uniform
rotation
azimuthal
domain walls
rotation
planar
0 5 10 15 20 250.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16 HF
HD= 15 G = 1.5 mT
vD= 0.7 mm/s
C
(ra
d/s
)
Magnetic Field (Gauss)
-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
BtoAD = 0.26 mm
R (
mH
z)
(rad/s)
1)2)3)4)
-0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
trap
trap
R (
mH
z)
(rad/s)
1 2 3 4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
N to A
pers (
rad
/s)
Time (hours)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Nu
mb
er
of
qu
an
ta v
ort
ice
s
In textures with domain walls:
total circulation of ~ 50 0 of both directions can be trapped after stopping rotation
Trapped vorticity
vs(R) = Nκ0(2πR)-1
trap = vs/R
vs
Hydrodynamic instability at vc∼ħ(2m3ac)-1 (Feynman)(when l is free to rotate)
Soft core radius ac can be manipulated by varying either:
slab thickness D
♦ H = 0 : ac ∼ D → vc∝D-1
or magnetic field H
♦ 2-4 G < H < 25 G : ac ∼ ξH ∝H-1 → vc ∝ H
♦ H > 25 G : ac ∼ ξd = 10 μm → vc∼1 mm/s
HF=2-4 G
vc
H
vc~1 mm/s
Hd≈25 G
vc∝D-1vc∝H
Theory for vc (intrinsic nucleation)
Alternative theory
vc ~ D-1 :
Why? Not quite aligned texture!
(numerical simulations for v = 3 vF)
-0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4-0.015
-0.010
-0.005
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
Wc-=0.038 rad/s(v
c=0.19 mm/s)
W = 0.055rad/s(v
c= 0.28 mm/s)
Uniform 0.26 mm Model 0.26 mm Uniform 0.44 mm Model 0.44 mm
+
0 = 0.0047 rad/s
(N-
trap = 11, v
p=0.024 mm/s)
-
0= -0.0092 rad/s
(N-
trap= 22, v
p= 0.047 mm/s)
c
- = 0.055 rad/s
(vc
-= 0.28 mm/s)
c
+ = 0.095 rad/s
(vc
+= 0.48 mm/s)
tr
ap (
rad/
s)
prep
(rad/s)
However, these are also possible:
lz=+1dz=-1
lz=+1dz=+1
lz=-1dz=-1
lz=-1dz=+1
d-wall
dl-walll-wall
lz=+1dz=+1
lz=-1dz=+1
unlocked walls presentdl-walls only
or
-0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
c= 0.03 rad/s
(vc= 0.15 mm/s)
trap
= 0.03 rad/s
trap
(ra
d/s)
prep
(rad/s)
NtoA, 0.44 mm BtoA, 0.44 mm NtoA, 0.26 mm BtoA, 0.26 mm
-0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
trap
= 0.005 rad/s
c = 0.10 rad/s
(vc = 0.5 mm/s)
trap
(ra
d/s)
prep
(rad/s)
Uniform texture, D = 0.26 mm
Models of critical state
Strong pinning (vM > vc):
Single parameter, vc :
c = vc /R trap = vc/R
Weak pinning (vp < vc):
Two parameters, vc and vM :
c = vc /R trap = vp/R
Horizontal scale set by c = vc /R
Vertical scale set by trap = vp /R vs
?
-0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
c= 0.03 rad/s
(vc= 0.15 mm/s)
trap
= 0.03 rad/s
trap
(ra
d/s)
prep
(rad/s)
NtoA, 0.44 mm BtoA, 0.44 mm NtoA, 0.26 mm BtoA, 0.26 mm
-0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4
-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
trap
= 0.005 rad/s
c = 0.10 rad/s
(vc = 0.5 mm/s)
trap
(ra
d/s)
prep
(rad/s)
Uniform texture, D = 0.26 mm
Hysteretic “remnant magnetization”
Horizontal scale set by c = vc /R
Vertical scale set by trap = vp /R vs
?
(p.t.o.)
What sets the critical state of trapped vortices?