contribution to aspo-workshop 2003, paris

71
L-B-Systemtechnik Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris Renewable Energy in Europe - past and Future July 27, 2003 Paris Dr. Werner Zittel, L-B-Systemtechnik GmbH, Germany - Development over the past decade and trend extrapolations - Renewables and transport sector

Upload: rafiki

Post on 17-Jan-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris. Renewable Energy in Europe - past and Future July 27, 2003 Paris Dr. Werner Zittel, L-B-Systemtechnik GmbH, Germany. - Development over the past decade and trend extrapolations - Renewables and transport sector. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

Renewable Energy in Europe - past and FutureJuly 27, 2003 Paris

Dr. Werner Zittel, L-B-Systemtechnik GmbH, Germany

- Development over the past decade and trend extrapolations

- Renewables and transport sector

Page 2: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Renewable Energy in Europe - past and Future

• Most official energy forecasts extrapolate „business as usual scenarios“

• If no structural problem in conventional energy supply is perceived, there is no need to change to renewable fuels

• Under present economic conditions renewable energy sources are uneconomic or marginally economic (neglecting external costs and subsidies of fossil and nuclear fuels)

• However, if climate change is a real issue, if nuclear has serious problems and if oil becomes a scarce commodity, economic conditions will change in favor of renewable energy technologies

Page 3: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Renewables and the Energy Sector - a different view

• If oil production will peak soon, this will have serious consequences on economy and energy prices

• In contrast to 1980, energy efficiency as well as renewable energy is at a much more sophisticated technological and economic level which allows for market introduction on a broad scale

• The future will show which perspective is closer to reality: The IEA-forecast or the LBST-forecast! It is not unlikely that future energy supply develops as seen by LBST:

Page 4: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Renewables and the Energy Sector - a differentl view!

90 Mbpd

75 Mbpd80 Mbpd

2020: IEATPES 13500oil 39 %gas 26 %coal 25 %nuclear 5 %solar 5 %

Page 5: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Renewables and the Energy Sector - a differentl view!

90 Mbpd

75 Mbpd80 Mbpd

: BP Statistical Review of World Energy

2020: IEATPES 13500oil 39 %gas 26 %coal 25 %nuclear 5 %solar 5 %

Page 6: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Renewables and the Energy Sector - a differentl view!

90 Mbpd

75 Mbpd80 Mbpd

: BP Statistical Review of World Energy

: LBST most likely forecast

2020: IEA LBSTTPES 13500 12500oil 39 % 25 %gas 26 % 33 %coal 25 % 14 %nuclear 5 % 5%solar 5 % 23 %

coal

Page 7: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

UK

Sweden

Spain

Portugal

Netherlands

Luxembourg

Italy

Ireland

Greece

Germany

France

Finland

Denmark

Belgium

Austria

GWhel

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh

EU-15: Electricity from hydro power

OECD Energy balances

~12 % of

Change of statistical base

Page 8: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

UK

Sweden

Spain

Portugal

Netherlands

Luxembourg

Italy

Ireland

Greece

Germany

France

Finland

Denmark

Belgium

Austria

GWhel

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh

EU-15: Electricity from hydro power - adapted

OECD Energy balances

~12 % of

Change of statistical base (corrected)

Statisticsunclear

Page 9: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

EU-15 Electricity Production from Wind energy

• In the 1980ies, Denmark started to establish a wind energy industry Today the Danish wind energy industry has more employees than the ship building industry

• In the 1990ies, Germany supported the wind energy industry by feed-in rules [Renewable Energy Act] which gave marginal earnings (at favorable sites and with good planning the return on investment is reasonable, at poor sites or with poor management the return on investment is negative)

• Most European Countries have not yet even started to use its wind energy potentials

• Even under „poor“ economic conditions wind energy has growth rates at about 40 percent p.y. since more than a decade. Already today the share of wind energy in electricity generation is above 1.5 %.

• As soon as even pure market economics are in favor of wind energy, the growth rates could enhance and swap over to those countries with vast resources

Page 10: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

UK

Sweden

Spain

Portugal

Netherlands

Luxembourg

Italy

Ireland

Greece

Germany

France

Finland

Denmark

Belgium

Austria

GWhel

Growth Rate 1990-2000: ~ 40 % p.y.

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh

EU-15: Successful market introduction of wind power

Capacity statistics from EWEAenergy production: LBST-calculation

~1.6 % of

Page 11: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

UK

Sweden

Spain

Portugal

Netherlands

Luxembourg

Italy

Ireland

Greece

Germany

France

Finland

Denmark

Belgium

Austria

GWhel

Growth Rate 1990-2000: ~ 40 % p.y.

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh

EU-15: Successful market introduction of wind power

Capacity statistics from EWEAenergy production: LBST-calculation

~1.6 % of

Page 12: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

UK

Sweden

Spain

Portugal

Netherlands

Luxembourg

Italy

Ireland

Greece

Germany

France

Finland

Denmark

Belgium

Austria

GWhel

Growth Rate 1990-2000: ~ 40 % p.y.

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh

EU-15: Successful market introduction of wind power

Capacity statistics from EWEAenergy production: LBST-calculation

~1.6 % of

Page 13: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

UK

Sweden

Spain

Portugal

Netherlands

Luxembourg

Italy

Ireland

Greece

Germany

France

Finland

Denmark

Belgium

Austria

GWhel

Growth Rate 1990-2000: ~ 40 % p.y.

EU-15: Successful market introduction of wind power

Capacity statistics from EWEAenergy production: LBST-calculation

Equivalent tooil field with 200 kb/dayor 1.4 Gb size

Page 14: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

EU-15: How much wind energy is it?

• In 2002 Europe added wind capacity which was five times as much as that of an average nuclear plant.

• The electricity generated in 2002 will be equal to that of five nuclear power plants

• If this amount would be produced from oil fired power plants, it would consume 75 mio barrel/year or 200 kb/day.

• Over 20 years life time this saves about 1.5 Gb of oil

• Planning times of new wind parks are in the range of 2 - 3 years before grid connection is achieved

• Within the last ten years 40 TWh/yr electricity from wind are added. This is equivalent to the planning, construction and connection of five large nuclear power plants. Would it be possible, to add five nuclear power plants within ten years (including planning, construction and grid connection)?

Page 15: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

EU 15 - Electricity Production from Wind Energy - Forecast

•If 2002 would mark the peak year of new wind capacity additions and the decline would be symmetric to the growth, then wind energy in Europe would end up with about 4 percent share on electricity production •The European Wind Energy Association expects wind energy to contribute about 5 % of EU-15 electricity supply until 2010 and above 10 percent until 2020. This is equivalent to 16 % annual growth

• The actual growth rate is even twice as much (35 % p.y.)

Page 16: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

30000

60000

90000

120000

150000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

MW

If peak growth was in 2002.

EU 15 - Electricity Production from Wind Energy - Forecast

Page 17: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

30000

60000

90000

120000

150000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

MW

35 % p.a.

EU 15 - Electricity Production from Wind Energy - Forecast

If present growth continues

Page 18: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

30000

60000

90000

120000

150000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

MW

35 % p.a.

EWEA-Target2000

Onshore

offshore

EU 15 - Electricity Production from Wind Energy - Forecast

Page 19: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

30000

60000

90000

120000

150000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

MW

16 % p.a.

35 % p.a.

EWEA-Target2000

Onshore

offshore

Share on EU-Electricity Production 5 %

EU 15 - Electricity Production from Wind Energy - Forecast

Page 20: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Worldwide wind energy capacity

• Forecasts by the IEA for oil, gas or nuclear energy were always much too optimistic Forecasts by the IEA for renewable energy are always bullish pessimistic

• The IEA World Energy Outlook 1998 forecast for the year 2010 could be proofed to be wrong almost three years after its publication

• With respect to the IEA world energy outlook 2002 forecast even at end 2002 reality was about five years ahead of the forecast

• In 1999 BTM consult published a road map for achieving a share of 10 percent on world electricity production in 2020 by wind energy. („Windforce ten“) Already in 2002 the reality is ahead of that road map

Page 21: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

1980 1990 2000 10 20

GW

Reality 1997

IEA World Energy Outlook 1998

Worldwide wind energy capacity

Page 22: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

1980 1990 2000 10 20

IEA World Energy Outlook 1998

Reality 1999

GW

Worldwide wind energy capacity

Page 23: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

1980 1990 2000 10 20

IEA World Energy Outlook 1998

Reality 1999

GW

Windforce 10 (202010 % electricity share)[1999]

Worldwide wind energy capacity

Page 24: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

1980 1990 2000 10 20

IEA World Energy Outlook 1998

Reality 1999

GW

IEA World Energy Outlook 2002

Windforce 10 (202010 % electricity share)[1999]

Worldwide wind energy capacity

Page 25: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

1980 1990 2000 10 20

IEA World Energy Outlook 1998

Reality 2002

GW

IEA World Energy Outlook 2002

Windforce 10 (202010 % electricity share)[1999]

1% share ofelectricity production

Worldwide wind energy capacity

Page 26: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

EU-15 Electricity Production from Biomass

• Sweden, Finland and Austria have the largest share of biomass in electricity production

• The growth rate in Finland was about 10 % annually

• The share of biomass in electricity generation is about 1.1 percent

• In latest years biomass gasification helped to increase the share

Page 27: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

GWhel

Growth Rate 1990-2000: ~ 10 % p.y.

Austria

Finland

Sweden

EU-15: Successful market introduction of Biomass

Source: 1989-2000 OECD Statistics 2002 2001/2002 various country statistics from national instituts

and own estimates

~1.1 % of

Germany

UK

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh

Page 28: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

180000

200000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

GWhel

Growth Rate 1990-2000: ~ 10 % p/yr

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh

10 % p.y.

7 % p.y.

20 % p.y.

Share on EU-Electricity Production 5 %

EU-15 Electricity Production from Biomass - Forecast

Page 29: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

EU-15 Electricity Production from Photovoltaics

• The growth of PV was largest in Germany over the last decade (~ 30 %) Since the existence of the feed-in law in 1999 the growth rate increased strongly

• Today, installed PV capacity in Germany is at the same level as wind energy was ten years ago

• The costs of grid connected PV systems have reduced by a factor of three over the last 15 years and today are close to 0.6 EUR/kWh in middle Europe. Since the introduction of the German feed in law in 1999 total cost of grid connected PV reduced by about 15 percent or 5 percent annualy.

• Presently, BP alone employs more than 1000 employees in the PV business

Page 30: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

GWhel

Growth Rate 1991-2000: ~ 20-30 % p.a.

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh

Germany

PV-Share on Electricity Production in 2002: ~ 0,012 %

EU-15: Beginning market introduction of photovoltaics

20 % p.a.

30 % p.a.

Capacity statistics from various statistical sourcesenergy production: LBST-calculation

Page 31: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

EU-15 Electricity Production from Photovoltaics - Forecast

• BP expects to reduce costs by another factor of two within next five years Shell expects annual cost reductions by 5 - 6 percent

• RWE Schott Solar expects 15-18 percent cost reduction with each doubling of production volume.

• Swiss bank Sarassin expects the growth rate of PV to increase substantially over the next few years (comparable to the cellular phone or PC market in the last years)

• If the growth rate over the next ten years is the same as the growth rate of wind energy over the past ten years, PV will contribute more than 1 percent to EU electricity in 2010

Page 32: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

25000

50000

75000

100000

125000

150000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

GWhel

Growth Rate 1991-2000: ~ 20-30 % p.a.

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh 40 % p.a.

20 % p.a.

Share on EU-Electricity Production 1 %

Share on EU-Electricity Production 5 %

50 % p.a.

EU-15 Electricity Production from Photovoltaics - Forecast

30 % p.a.

Page 33: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Cum. Photovoltaics worldwide 2002

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

MW

Jahr

Quelle: WWI 1993; Sonnenergie & Wärmetechnik 1/98, Photon 1/98

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

BRD

worldVdEW 95

Substitutes 30 kb/dayoil sourcesor 300 Mb

field size

Page 34: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

EU-15 Electricity Production from Geothermal Energy

• Electricity production from geothermal grew about 3 percent annually

•Today only Portugal, France and Italy use geothermal electricity

• New methods (e.g. hot-dry rock; ORC electricity generation) open a huge potential for electricity generation

• The Geothermal Society expects electricity generation from geothermal sources at 16 TWh in 2010 and between 24 - 64 TWh in 2020 (Ferrara- Declaration 1999)

Page 35: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

GWhel

Growth Rate 1991-2000: ~ 3 % p.a.

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh

Italy

Geothermal-Share on Electricity Production 2000: ~ 0,17 %

Portugal Growth Rate 1991-1998: ~ 30 % p.a.

3 % p.a.

5 % p.a.

EU-15 Electricity Production from Geothermal Energy

Page 36: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

EU-15 Electricity Production from All Renewables 2002

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

renewable electricity

Geothermal

Solar

Biomass

Wind

Hydro

TWh/yr

~16 % share of electricity consumption

Page 37: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

EU-15 Electricity Production from All Renewables

• Today Renewable Electricity supply has a share of 14 - 15 percent

• If present trends continue for the next 20 years, this share will increase to more than 20 percent in 2010 and to more than 50 percent in 2020 (provided total electricity supply will remain constant; note that this holds even when hydro is kept constant and when wind energy will rise at half of its historical growth rate)

• If trends of „best practice countries“ apply to all EU countries this share could rise even faster

Page 38: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

500

1000

1500

1990 2000 2010 2020

TWhel

Hydro 0 % p.a.

Wind 17 % p.a.

Biomass 7 % p.a.

Solar 30 %p.a.Geothermal 3 %p.a.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1990 2000 2010 2020

TWhel

EU-15 Electricity Production from All Renewables - Two scenarios

Precautious Trend extrapolation

Market introductionof wind power

Hydro 0 % p.a.

Wind 20 % p.a.

Biomass 10 % p.a.

Solar 40 %p.a.

Geothermal 30 %p.a.

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh

Optimistic Trend extrapolation from „best practice“ countries

Page 39: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

500

1000

1500

1990 2000 2010 2020

TWhel

Hydro 0 % p.a.

Wind 17 % p.a.

Biomass 7 % p.a.

Solar 30 %p.a.Geothermal 3 %p.a.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1990 2000 2010 2020

TWhel

EU-15 Electricity Production from All Renewables - Two scenarios

Precautious Trend extrapolationMarket penetration of wind power

Market introductionof wind power

Hydro 0 % p.a.

Wind 20 % p.a.

Biomass 10 % p.a.

Solar 40 %p.a.

Geothermal 30 %p.a.

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh

Optimistic Trend extrapolation from „best practice“ countries

Page 40: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

500

1000

1500

1990 2000 2010 2020

TWhel

Hydro 0 % p.a.

Wind 17 % p.a.

Biomass 7 % p.a.

Solar 30 %p.a.Geothermal 3 %p.a.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1990 2000 2010 2020

TWhel

EU-15 Electricity Production from All Renewables - Two scenarios

Precautious Trend extrapolationMarket penetration of wind power and biomass

Market introductionof wind power

Hydro 0 % p.a.

Wind 20 % p.a.

Biomass 10 % p.a.

Solar 40 %p.a.

Geothermal 30 %p.a.

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh

Optimistic Trend extrapolation from „best practice“ countries

Market introductionof solar electricity

Page 41: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

500

1000

1500

1990 2000 2010 2020

TWhel

Hydro 0 % p.a.

Wind 17 % p.a.

Biomass 7 % p.a.

Solar 30 %p.a.Geothermal 3 %p.a.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1990 2000 2010 2020

TWhel

EU-15 Electricity Production from All Renewables - Two scenarios

Precautious Trend extrapolationMarket penetration of wind power and biomass

Market introductionof wind power

Hydro 0 % p.a.

Wind 20 % p.a.

Biomass 10 % p.a.

Solar 40 %p.a.

Geothermal 30 %p.a.

EU-Electricity Production 2002: ~ 2500 TWh

Optimistic Trend extrapolation from „best practice“ countries

Market penetration of solar and geothermalelectricity ?Market introduction

of solar electricity

Page 42: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

EU-15 Thermal End Use Energy Supply by Biomass

• Contribution of biomass to thermal energy supply is about 6 %.

• The annual growth rate varies between 2 - 5 percent annually

• At present growth rate this could increase to 10-20 percent in 2020

Page 43: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

250000

500000

750000

1000000

1250000

1500000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

GWhth

Growth Rate 1991-1998: ~ 2 % p.a.

Thermal End Use Energy Demand 2000: ~ 6000 TWh

5 % p.a.Growth Rate

Share on EU Themal Energy Demand 10 %

10 % p.a.Growth Rate

2 % p.a.Growth Rate

EU-15 Thermal End Use Energy Supply by Biomass

~0.77 Mb/day

Page 44: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

EU-15 Thermal End Use Energy Supply by Solar Energy

• Average growth rate of Solar thermal energy use is about 10 % annually

• In Greece Solar thermal energy has a much higher share than in Italy, Portugal or Spain with comparable solar isolation. This is mainly due to different political support

• The contribution in 2020 could rise to between 0.5 - 3 % if present trends continue (lower figure 10 % annual growth rate, upper figure 20 % annually)

Page 45: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

GWhth

Growth Rate 1991-2000: ~ 10 % p.a.

Solar Share on Thermal End Use EnergySupply 2002: ~ 0,095 %

Thermal End Use Energy Demand EU 2000: ~ 6000 TWh

2002-Zahlen: LBST-Schätzung mit BRD-Zahlen aus SW&T1/02

EU-15 Thermal End Use Energy Supply by Solar Energy

Capacity statistics from various statistical sourcesenergy production: LBST-calculation

~10 kb/day

Page 46: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

GWhth

Growth Rate 1991-2000: ~ 10 % p.a.

Solar Share on Thermal End Use EnergySupply 2002: ~ 0,095 %

Thermal End Use Energy Demand EU 2000: ~ 6000 TWh

Growth Rate in Germany1991-2000: ~ 20 % p.a.

Growth Rate in Austria1991-2000: 15 % p.a.

Greece

2002-Zahlen: LBST-Schätzung mit BRD-Zahlen aus SW&T1/02

EU-15 Thermal End Use Energy Supply by Solar Energy

Capacity statistics from various statistical sourcesenergy production: LBST-calculation

~10 kb/day

Page 47: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

The Potential of Renewable Energy in the European Community

• At the present growth rate, renewable energy will rise to a share of about 10 percent of thermal energy use in 2020

• At growth rates applicable to „best practice“ countries the share could rise to about 20 - 25 %

• On the other hand: Thermal energy is mainly used in buildings where in general the highest potential for increased efficiency exists

Page 48: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

The Potential of Renewable Energy in the European Community

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

1990 2000 2010 2020

Biomasse 5% p.a.

Solar 20 %p.a.Geothermal 10 % p.a.

TWh th0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

1990 2000 2010 2020

Biomass 2 % p.a.

Solar 15 %p.a.Geothermal 3 %p.a.

EU-thermal energy demand 2002: ~ 6000 TWh

Page 49: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

EU-15 End use energy requirement and oil dependence

• The industry learned from the 1970ies oil crises to reduce its energy consumption

• Only the transport sector grew steadily over the last 40 years

• The share of electricity on final energy supply is rising

• The transport sector is most vulnerable to oil supply disruptions

• The whole industry depends on cheap transport („just in time“ is cheaper than large store houses)

Page 50: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

500

0

100

200

300

400

500

60 70 80 90 2000

EU-15 End use energy requirement and oil dependence

otherIndustry

transport

Source: OECD

Mtoe

electricity

IndustryTransport

Other

renewableotherelectricityoil

Source: Energy Balances of OECD Countries

Page 51: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

500

0

100

200

300

400

500

60 70 80 90 2000

EU-15 End use energy requirement and oil dependence

otherIndustry

transport

Source: OECD

Mtoe

electricity

IndustryTransport

Other

renewableotherelectricityoil

Source: Energy Balances of OECD Countries

Transport (only Germany)

-1.5 % p.yr.

Page 52: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

EU- oil consumption in Transport and scenario for future reductions

Assumption:

• Each year ten percent of cars are replaced

• The average fuel consumption of new cars reduces by x percent with respect to the preceeding year

• In Germany the average fuel consumption of all passenger cars grew from 8.1 l/100km in 1960 to ~10 l/100km in 1975; it was almost constant until 1985 and reduced to 9.4 l/100 km in 1990 and to ~8.5 l/100 km in 2000. However most of this was offset by higher traveling volumes.

Page 53: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

100

200

300

400

60 70 80 90 2000 10 20

Mto

Assumptions- Average life time of cars 10 years- each year fossil fuel consumption of all new cars decreases by x %

X=0.5 %

Fuel consumption of new carsin 2020 with respect to 2000 fuel consumption

90 %Oil consumptionof Traffic

EU- oil consumption in Transport and scenario for future reductions

Page 54: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

100

200

300

400

60 70 80 90 2000 10 20

Mto

Assumptions- Average life time of cars 10 years- each year fossil fuel consumption of all new cars decreases by x %

X=0.5 %

X=1 %

X=5 % X=2 %

Fuel consumption of new carsin 2020 with respect to 2000 fuel consumption

37 %

67 %

82 %90 %

Oil consumptionof Traffic

EU- oil consumption in Transport and scenario for future reductions

Page 55: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0102030405060708090

100

70 80 90 2000

01002003004005006007008009001000

Transport oil consumption: USA / Germany

Germany

USA

Mtoe / Germany Mtoe / USA

Oil crisis

Germanunification

1st gulf war

Source: OECD-Statisticssince 2000: USA-DoE; Germany- MWV (2003 data extrapolated from January-April)

year

-1.5 % p.yr.

Page 56: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Technical Potentials of Renewable Energy Sources in the EU

• The potential for biomass includes only biogenic waste, residues and sludge

• The wind power potential minimum includes offshore sites up to 10 km distance from cost line and 10 m water depth

• The wind power potential maximum includes offshore sites up to 30 km distance from cost line and 30 m water depth

• The PV potential minimum includes only roof mounted solar cells

• The PV potential maximum includes facade mounted modules

• The Solar Thermal potential includes only sites south of 40 °

Page 57: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

min max min max Hydro min max min max SOT

Forest ResidueIndustrial Wood Res.

Lower Value

Upper Value

Wind onshore

Wind offshore

Straw Residue

*

* still to tap potential in the EU** only EU

**

Agriculture

Bio Waste

SludgeconventionalTidal Power

Biogas(Methane)

Biomass Wind Power

TWh/aEU Electricity Consumption 2002: 2.478 TWh(Source: IEA 2002)

(Biomass: Thermal Energy; Hydro Power, Wind, PV und SOT: Electric Energy)

Technical Potentials of Renewable Energy Sources in the EU

Wood Residues, other

PV

Roof mounted

Roof mounted+ house frontswith todays technology

Technological Progress

Page 58: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Future fuels for cars

Renewable Fuel: - hydrogen - electricity - Biofuels

Future Challanges: - reduction of demand - change of mode (modal split) - downsizing of cars

- hybrid vehicles - switch to renewable fuel

Page 59: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Demand min max min max min max min max min max min max

TWh/a

(Transport)1998 *

Road Transport

Aviation

Rail Transport

Inland Navigation

Wood and Straw Residues

*Source: IEA-Statistics 1997-1998

Via Biogas

Biogas(Methane)

Hydrogen(pressurized)

Methanol Synfuel

Plant Oil Ethanol fromLignocellulose

Cultivation (fast growing plants)

Potentials show possible alternatives and cannot be added.Available area for cultivation of energy plants in the EU: 3,3 - 26,4 Mio ha

Technical Potentials: Fuels derived from Biomass in the EU - range

Page 60: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Comments on the available area for cultivation for the growing of energy plants:

• The upper value (26.4 Mio ha) assumes an increased intensification of agricultural production (FfE 1998).

• A further intensification of agricultural production is not sustainable. Therefore the EU aims at extensification.

• Oil plants: The share of rape seed may not exceeed 25% within the rotation cycle of a given crop. With biological agriculture method this limit is lower.

• An assignment of 26.4 Mio ha to the growing of energy plants would represent 30% of the arable land in the EU

• The area not cultivated (laid off) at present has a size of about 7.2 Mio ha (FfE 1998).

Technical Potentials: Fuels Derived from Biomass in the EU

Page 61: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Demand min max min max min max min max min max min max

TWh/a

(Transport)1998 *

Road transport

Aviation

Rail transport

Inland navigation

Wood and straw residues

*Source: IEA-Statistics 1997-1998

Via Biogas

Biogas(Methane)

Hydrogen(pressurized)

Methanol Synfuel Plant Oil Ethanol fromLignocellulose

Cultivation (fast growing plants)

Potentials show possible alternatives and cannot be added.Cultivable area for energy plants in the EU: 7.2 Mio ha

Technical Potentials: Fuels Derived from Biomass in the EU - probable

Page 62: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Technical Potentials: Fuels Derived from Renewable Electricity (EU)

Warning: The following technical potential does not take care of alternative use of the renewable source.

Page 63: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

min max min max min max

[TWh/a]

Technical Potentials: Fuels Derived from Renewable Electricity (EU)

Wind on-shore

Wind off-shore

1) Source: IEA-Statistics 1997-19982) still to tap potential3) within the EU

Road transport

Aviation

Inland navigation

Rail transport

Hydro power2)

PV (roofs)

Solar thermalpower stations 3)

Consumption(Transport)

1998 1)

CGH2 LH2Methanol

PV (+house fronts)

PV (+new technology)

Page 64: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

GasolineDiesel

Methanol NG

Methanol Wood ResidueCNG, p(in) = 0,1 MPaCNG, p(in) = 4,0 MPa

LNGCGH2 NG

CGH2 Wood ResidueCGH2 Wind off-shore

LH2 NG

LH2 Wood ResidueLH2 Wind off-shore

LH2 SOT

LH2 Geothermal

CO2-Equivalent [g/kWh]

Tank-to-wheel

Well-to-tank

Hydrogen / Methanol: Green-House-Gas Emissions (CO2-Equivalents)

Page 65: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

0,05

0,1

0,15

0,2

0,25

GasolineDiesel

Methanol NG

Methanol Wood Residue

CGH2 NG

CGH2 Wood ResidueCGH2 Wind off-shore

LH2 NG

LH2 Wood ResidueLH2 Wind off-shore

LH2 SOT

LH2 Geothermal

Fuel Costs [EUR/kWh]

Tax

Without Tax

Hydrogen / Methanol: Fuel Costs

Page 66: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Fuel Costs and GHG Emissions of Compressed Gaseous Hydrogen (EU)

0

100

200

300

0 1 2 3 4

Costs [EUR/lgasoline equivalent]

CO 2

- eq

uiv

ale

nt [g

/kW

h]

gasoline/diesel

without With tax

CGH2 from...

Biomass

Hydro

Windpoweroffshore

Solarthermal

Source: LBST, 2001 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

Page 67: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

CUTE (Clean urban transport in Europe)

Page 68: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

CUTE (Clean urban transport in Europe)

Page 69: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Hydrogen filling stations in Europe

BVG/TFE Berlin LH2 and 25 MPa CGH2

H2 Vehicle Demonstration at Munich Airport[Source: H2MUC 1999]

Reykjavik, April 2003

Mainz, 70 MPa, by Linde, April 2003

Oct 2002

CEP BerlinLH2 and 70 MPa CGH2

Summer 2003

Page 70: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003

Boe/day

Hydrogen fuel consumption for Transport - Europe

Spring 2003: 19 fueling stationsSpring 2004 27 fueling stations

Page 71: Contribution to ASPO-Workshop 2003, Paris

L-B-Systemtechnik

Summary

• The growth of renewables in Europe was different in all countries due to different political support

•Simple trend extrapolation exhibits that at present growth rates about 20 percent of electricity will be renewable in 2010. This share would rise to about 50 percent in 2020

• Even in countries supporting renewables they are still close to „being marginally economic“. As soon as market economics change (e.g. by passing oil peak production) the growth rates could enhance

• The potential is sufficient to ensure a 100 percent renewable energy supply

• The transport sector will be hit strongest by oil scarcity. Introduction of new fuels is most urgent but also most difficult here

• The future will show which growth rates will be realised and which energy mix will be achieved

• Detailed strategies exist how to substitute fossil and nuclear fuels completely by 2050 [e.g. EU financed LTI-Study 1998]